Skip to main content
Download PDF

Analysis of circulating extracellular vesicle derived microRNAs in breast cancer patients with obesity: a potential role for Let-7a

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 21, Article number: 232 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence of obesity, a known risk factor for several metabolic and chronic diseases, including numerous malignancies, has risen sharply in the world. Various clinical studies demonstrate that excessive Body Mass Index (BMI) may worsen the incidence, prognosis, and mortality rates of breast cancer. Thus, understanding the link tying up obesity and breast cancer onset and progression is critically important, as it can impact patients’ survival and quality of life. Recently, circulating extracellular vesicle (EV) derived miRNAs have attracted much attention for their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic potential in oncology research. Although the potential role of EV-derived miRNAs in the early detection of breast cancer has been repeatedly mentioned, screening of miRNAs packaged within serum EVs has not yet been reported in patients with obesity.

Methods

Circulating EVs were isolated from normal weight (NW), and overweight/obese (OW/Ob) breast cancer patients and characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA), and protein marker expression. Evaluation of EV-associated miRNAs was conducted in a screening (RNA-seq) and a validation (qRT-PCR) cohort. Bioinformatic analysis was performed to uncover significantly enriched biological processes, molecular functions and pathways. ROC and Kaplain-Meier survival analyses were used for clinical significance.

Results

Comparison of serum EV-derived miRNAs from NW and OW/Ob patients detected seven differentially expressed miRNAs (let-7a-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-30d-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-27b-3p, miR-4772-3p, and miR-10a-5p) in the screening cohort. GO analysis revealed the enrichment of protein phosphorylation, intracellular signal transduction, signal transduction, and vesicle-mediated transport among the top biological processes. In addition, the target genes were significantly enriched in pathways related to PI3K/Akt, growth hormones, and insulin signalings, which are all involved in obesity-related diseases and/or breast cancer progression. In the validation cohort, qRT-PCR confirmed a significant down-regulation of EV-derived let-7a in the serum of OW/Ob breast cancer patients compared to NW patients. Let-7a levels also exhibited a negative correlation with BMI values. Importantly, decreased let-7a miRNA expression was associated with higher tumor grade and poor survival in patients with breast cancer.

Conclusion

These results suggest that serum-EV derived miRNAs may reflect a differential profile in relation to a patient’s BMI, which, once validated in larger cohorts of patients, could provide insights into novel specific biomarkers and innovative targets to prevent the progression of obesity-mediated breast cancer.

Introduction

The escalating global epidemic of overweight and obesity—‘globesity’—is becoming one of the leading public health crises and has posed serious threats to human health and life quality [1]. Several epidemiologic studies have identified excessive adiposity as a major risk factor for an expanding set of chronic diseases, including different types of malignancies [2]. Excess body weight has been implicated in 15–20% of total cancer-related death [3, 4]. Among overweight/obesity-associated cancers in women, breast cancer represents the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of mortality in the world. Indeed, there is expanding evidence showing that high body mass index (BMI) strongly influences risk, prognosis and progression of breast carcinoma and has profound implications on therapeutic management of patients [5,6,7]. At diagnosis, patients with obesity are more likely to have a worse prognosis [8, 9] and women with a high BMI, regardless of menopausal or hormone receptor status, are at increased risk of breast cancer recurrence [10,11,12,13]. In particular, meta-analysis studies found an estimated 35–40% increased risk of disease recurrence or death in obese breast cancer patients compared with normal-weight women [14,15,16]. Other reports showed that obesity is associated with larger tumor size, positive lymph node status, metastasis development, shorter distant disease-free interval and overall survival [17,18,19,20,21], emphasizing an increased aggressiveness of breast malignancy in patients with high body adiposity. Moreover, a lower benefit of anti-tumor adjuvant therapies (i.e. radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and/or endocrine therapy) has also been encountered in obese women [5, 7]. The mechanisms behind the interplay between obesity and breast cancer progression are likely to be multifactorial and may involve imbalanced adipokine production, abnormal growth factor signaling, a chronic low-grade inflammation, oxidative stress, increased hormone biosynthesis, and the release of several metabolic substrates [7, 22]. Aside from these mediators, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as new players in this scenario [23,24,25,26,27,28,29].

EVs are nanoscale lipid-bilayer enclosed vesicles released from a variety of tissues and cells into biological fluids that are now recognized as a novel axis of intercellular communication, contributing not only to the maintenance of system and organ homeostasis but also to the pathogenesis of diseases. In cancer, EVs interact with, and deliver their contents to target cells in a functional capacity, playing a relevant role in tumor initiation, growth, metastatic dissemination and drug resistance [30,31,32,33,34]. Among others, one of the major exosomal cargo is non-coding RNA, which mainly encompasses miRNAs, short (19–25 nucleotides) RNA molecules that primarily bind to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of messenger RNAs to downregulate target proteins [35, 36]. Being the most potent gene expression regulators at the epigenetic, transcriptional, and post-transcriptional level, miRNAs have been found to affect one or several of the cancer hallmarks in a variety of human malignancies, including breast cancer [37,38,39]. Importantly, compared to free miRNAs in whole blood or serum, miRNAs packaged within EVs remain more stable and reliable since the phospholipid bilayer surrounding EVs can protect them from degradation by nucleases in the body fluids. Thus, EV-miRNAs have attracted much attention for their diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic utility over the past decade [37, 40]. A pioneer study published in 2016 demonstrated that miR-21 and miR-1246 are selectively enriched in human breast cancer exosomes and their evaluation may be useful for breast cancer diagnosis [41]. Another manuscript showed that EV-miR-21 and EV-miR-105 expression levels were significantly higher in metastatic breast cancer patients versus non-metastatic or healthy controls and EV-miR-222 may discriminate the basal-like and luminal B subtypes from luminal A one [42]; while Sueta et al. revealed 11 differentially expressed EV-miRNAs between recurrent and non-recurrent patients, and four of them (miR-17-5p, miR-93-5p, miR-130a-3p, and miR-340-5p) were significantly associated with recurrence in a logistic regression analysis [43]. More recently, EV-associated miRNAs were identified as predictors of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients [44, 45]. On the other hand, the miRNA cargo of EVs is also modified by obesity [46,47,48], suggesting their role in the development and progression of obesity-related disease. However, in spite of these observations, the potential involvement of circulating EV-derived miRNAs in obesity-associated breast cancers has not been yet investigated.

In the present study, for the first time, we aimed to compare the circulating EV-miRNA expression signatures in normal weight and overweight/obese breast cancer patients and identify potential obesity-related miRNAs that may be associated with progression. This new knowledge may hold great promise for future clinical management of women affected by breast cancer and obesity.

Materials and methods

Breast cancer patient population and plasma collection

A total of 45 female patients who were diagnosed with primary breast cancer (BC), between 2016 and 2020, at the Unit of Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery of the University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy, were enrolled in this study. Patients with different body mass index (BMI: weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, Kg/m2) were categorized as it follows: normal weight (NW; 18 > BMI < 24.9 kg/m2) and overweight/obese (OW/Ob BMI > 25 kg/m2). The study protocol was performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Ethical Committee of University of Naples Federico II (n. 107/05). Written informed consent was obtained from every female. Data for the following clinical variables: age, BMI, histology, grading, pre/post-menopausal status, Estrogen Receptor (ER), Progesterone Receptor (PR) and Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) status, and Ki67 levels as proliferative index were recorded. Venous blood samples were drawn and serum was obtained after centrifugation, at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and stored in sterile tubes at −80 °C until further processing.

Extracellular vesicles isolation

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated from serum sample using the ExoQuick isolation agent (System Bioscience, Palo Alto, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, serum samples (250 µl) were mixed with ExoQuick reagent and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C to precipitate vesicles. After incubation the samples were centrifuged at 1500 × g for 30 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 200 μL). The EV samples of the screening cohort have been mixed in equal amounts (3 samples in each pool) to obtain pooled EVs for each group of patients categorized according to the BMI: NW (n = 3 pools) and OW/Ob (n = 6 pools), for a total of 9 NW and 18 OW/Ob patients. The utilization of pooled samples to represent groups of breast cancer patients allowed to obtain enough RNA to yield reproducible reads for miRNA profiling. Figure 1A summarizes the process. Samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from the serum samples of breast cancer patients with different BMI. A. Schematic illustration of the study design. EVs were purified from serum samples of Normal weight (NW; BMI < 25 kg/m2), and Overweight/Obese (OW/Ob; BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) breast cancer patients by ExoQuick precipitation system. B. Representative images of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showing EVs isolated from serum of NW and OW/Ob patients. Scale bar, 100 nm. C. Representative size distribution profiles and concentration of serum EVs measured by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). D. Immunoblot analysis showing expression of the EV hallmarks Tsg101, CD9, CD63, CD81 and Alix in equal amount of EV lysates. The specificity of EV isolation was confirmed using and endoplasmic reticulum marker Calnexin

Full size image

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

For TEM analysis, serum EVs were suspended in PBS prior to fixing in 3% glutaraldehyde and transferred to the formovar-coated grids for 20 min, followed by 2% uranyl treatment for 1 min. The grids were examined in a Jeol JEM 1400 Plus electron microscope at 80 kV.

Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA)

NanoSight NS300 technology (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) was used to analyze the size distribution and the concentration of isolated EVs. The assays were performed according to the recommendation of the instrument’s manufacturer as previously described [49]. Briefly, diluted EV preparation in PBS was passed through the sample chamber and analyzed using a 488 nm laser. For each sample, 5 movies of 60 s were captured and analyzed with Nanosight particle tracking software to calculate particle concentration (particles/ml) and size distribution.

Immunoblot analysis

EV proteins were extracted adding RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2mMsodium fluoride, 2mMEDTA, and 0.1% SDS) containing a mixture of protease inhibitors (aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and sodium orthovanadate) to the isolated EV pellets. Protein concentration was quantified by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific, UK), according with manufacturer’s instructions. Equal amounts of EV extracts were resolved on 11% SDS–polyacrylamide gel as previously described [50], and probed with anti-Tsg101 (sc-7964, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-CD9 (ab236630, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-CD63 (ab213092, Abcam), anti-CD81 (ab155760, Abcam), anti-Alix (ab186429, Abcam) and anti-Calnexin (sc-11397, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) overnight at 4 °C, followed by secondary IRDye 800CW goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies (LI-COR, Germany). The images were acquired using Odissey FC (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA).

RNA isolation

Total RNA was extracted from purified vesicles using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Purified RNA was eluted in RNase-free water and stored at −80 °C until use. RNA concentration was determined by using Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and its quality was assessed with the TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Profiling of miRNAs in EVs

The miRNA profile of circulating EVs in breast cancer patients was performed by RNA-seq. Indexed libraries were prepared with NEXTFLEX Small RNA-Seq Kit v3 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were quantified using the TapeStation 4200 (Agilent Technologies) and Qubit Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), then pooled such that each index-tagged sample was present in equimolar amounts. The pooled samples were subject to cluster generation and sequencing using an Illumina NextSeq 550 Dx System (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) in a 1 × 75 single-end format. The raw sequencing files are deposited in the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are available through GEO Series accession number GSE222681.

Identification of miRNA target genes and their molecular pathways

The putative miRNA target genes were identified for each miRNA separately using mirDB (https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz757), with default parameters. The complete list of all miRNA target genes was termed as the “entire target signature”. For each setting, DAVID functional annotation was performed to uncover significantly overrepresented biological processes and molecular functions (https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2008.211). GO terms with a false discovery rate (FDR) values of < 0.05 and a p < 0.05 were considered.

Construction of the regulatory network

Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING, https://string-db.org/) database was used for online retrieval of known protein–protein interactions (PPI) [51]. We submitted the entire list of putative target genes to STRING and set the parameters including a minimum required interaction score > 0.9 (highest confidence).

qRT-PCR

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to validate the results of the bioinformatics analysis. Complementary DNA was synthesized with the TaqMan™ Advanced miRNA cDNA Synthesis Kit (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and miRNA expression levels were analysed using TaqMan™ MicroRNA assay probes (Additional file 1: Table S1) and TaqMan™ Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA samples were diluted 1:10 and distributed in triplicates of 5 µl each in the plate. A cDNA negative control was included in each assay. RT-q-PCR was performed on a QuantStudio™ 3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the following protocol: 95 °C for 20 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 1 s, and 60 °C for 20 s. The threshold value adopted was 0.2. Normalization was performed using the spike-in cel-miR-39 or the endogenous miR-191 or miR-484, frequently used by others [52,53,54]. The relative expression of miRNA expression was calculated using the comparative cycle threshold 2ΔΔ−Ct method.

Statistical analysis

For analysis of miRNA profiling, the bioinformatic tool cutadapt (version 2.5) was used to remove the adapter sequence according to the kit used. The tool sRNAbench was used to remove the low-quality reads and to obtain the miRNA expression profiling respect to miRBase database (version22—GRCh38—GCA_000001405.15). Reads that had a sum read count less than ten were excluded, in all samples. To identify differentially expressed miRNAs, the DESeq2 algorithm was used. miRNAs with p ≤ 0.05, and |Fold-Change| (|FC|) ≥ 1.5, were considered as differentially expressed between the two conditions. Linear regression was analyzed to evaluate the relationship between hsa-let-7a levels and BMI. The regression coefficient was used to graph the straight line that most closely described the association between variables, and the statistical correlation was evaluated by Pearson’s correlation. Receiver operating curves (ROC) were constructed and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval, sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate low hsa-let-7a levels as predictor of tumor grade (G3) or Ki67 positivity (Criterion: ≥ 20%). Data were analyzed for statistical significance (p < 0.05) using a two-tailed student’s Test, performed by GraphPad-Prism 7 software program (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Survival Kaplan–Meier analysis

Kaplan–Meier plots were generated using the Kaplan–Meier plotter online tool by using patient datasets as described [55].

Results and discussion

Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicles derived from breast cancer patients with different BMI

Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated from two different screening cohorts: breast cancer patients with normal weight (indicated as NW patients), and overweight/obese patients (indicated as OW/Ob patients). The workflow of our study is illustrated in Fig. 1A. The participants’ clinical information of age, BMI, menopausal status, tumor characteristics, and classification are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients with different BMI included in the screening cohort
Full size table

The EV enriched fractions were successfully extracted from the serum of all patients, and characterized by their shapes, size and protein markers (Fig. 1). TEM and NTA analysis showed that EVs in the isolated fractions were oval or bowl-shaped with a size range between 94 and 130 nm (Fig. 1B, C, respectively). In accordance with the Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles (MISEV) 2018 [56], enrichment of the EV markers Tsg101, CD9, CD63, CD81, and Alix were all detected in the EV enriched fractions derived from the serum (Fig. 1D). On the contrary, Calnexin, a negative marker for EVs, was absent in our isolated EVs (Fig. 1D). Besides, the protein of the EV-enriched fraction samples was also evaluated. An EV-associated protein concentration of 209.5 ± 25.7 µg per mL serum was reported.

miRNA expression in extracellular vesicles derived from breast cancer patients with different BMI

To determine the global expression profile of the EV-miRNAs isolated from the serum of our cohort, RNA was extracted from EVs and miRNA sequencing was performed. Raw data of small RNA sequencing were filtered and normalized. For each sample, no less than 10 clean reads were used. A total of 97 different miRNA probes were identified among all samples (Fig. 2A). Almost all of the known miRNAs were already included in Vesiclepedia [57] and ExoCarta [58] vesicular databases as related to EVs or exosomes from human samples (Fig. 2B). The hsa-let-7 family appeared as one of the most representative miRNA groups among our data set (~ 13%). The whole list of all identified miRNAs has been submitted to the Vesiclepedia database and entitled as this manuscript.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differentially expressed EV-miRNAs in breast cancer patients with different BMI assessed by RNA-seq. A. Venn diagram of identified EV-miRNAs in serum of NW and OW/Ob breast cancer patients. B. Venn diagram of the known miRNAs among our study, vesicular Vesiclepedia and ExoCarta databases. C. Heatmap of the differentially expressed EV-miRNAs in NW and OW/Ob breast cancer patients. The red and the green color scale indicate an increase and a decrease in miRNA expression levels, respectively

Full size image

Statistical analyses of the miRNAs identified by sequencing showed seven differentially expressed miRNAs in the screening cohort. In particular, four miRNAs were down-regulated (let-7a-5p, miR-122-5p, miR-30d-5p, and miR-126-3p), and three miRNAs were up-regulated (miR-27b-3p, miR-4772-3p, and miR-10a-5p) in OW/Ob population compared to NW patients (Table 2). A heatmap displaying results of the supervised hierarchical clustering is shown in Fig. 2C. These seven miRNAs were selected for further analysis.

Table 2 List of differentially-expressed mature miRNAs in circulating extracellular vesicles of Overweight/Obese breast cancer patients compared to patients with Normal Weight
Full size table

Potential function of EV-derived miRNAs identified in the screening cohort

We first carried out a bibliographic search of those seven significantly and differentially expressed miRNAs to examine any correlations with breast cancer progression and obesity Table 3, [52, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86].

Table 3 Summary of the literature for the differentially expressed EV-miRNAs between NW and OW/Ob breast cancer patients
Full size table

To date, no studies investigating the role of EV-derived miRNAs in obesity-related breast cancer were previously described in the literature and few studies have these selected miRNAs, mainly circulating ones, independently associated to either breast cancer or obesity. In particular, only let-7a, miRNA 27b, miR-122-5p, and miR-126-3p were reported to exist in breast cancer patients’ EVs and function in this context. Specifically, EV-derived let-7a, and miRNA 27b were found to be downregulated in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) patients compared to non-IBC and healthy controls [52] and in triple-negative breast cancer patients compared to HER2-positive ones [78]. Exosome-derived miR-122-5p was up-regulated in breast cancer women compared to normal controls [66], while expression levels of exosomal miR-126 did not change between breast cancer and control individuals [87]. Other reports demonstrated different expression of our identified circulating miRNAs in breast cancer patients’ plasma or serum and their correlation with clinical outcomes [59,60,61,62, 67, 68, 78, 81, 87,88,89,90]. For instance, expression levels of serum miRNA let-7 were significantly decreased in patients with breast cancer compared to control and to benign breast lesion groups, and negatively correlated with development of metastases [61]. Interestingly, some of the selected circulating miRNAs, especially circulating let-7a, miR-122, miR-126, and miR-27b, were also associated with clinical and biochemical markers of obesity, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and lipid profile [63,64,65, 69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77, 79, 82,83,84, 91, 92].

To define their potential functions, these seven significantly and differentially expressed EV-derived miRNAs were then screened for miRNA target genes’ prediction using mirDB software. The entire signature comprises 2754 genes in the down-regulated cohort and 2176 genes in the up-regulated one. These genes were analysed and networked by DAVID functional annotation to uncover significantly overrepresented biological processes and molecular functions (Fig. 3A, B, respectively). As expected, most of the analysed genes were related to the regulation of transcription (p = 1.80E-20). GO analysis for biological processes also revealed the enrichment of protein phosphorylation (p = 3.68E-10), intracellular signal transduction (p = 1.54E-09), and signal transduction (p = 1.88E-7). Moreover, the biological process indicated as vesicle-mediated transport (p = 4.77E-06) was also enriched. Among the molecular functions, protein binding was the most represented one (p = 1.40E-35). To understand the regulatory network of protein targets of EV-miRNAs found deregulated in our OW/Ob breast cancer patient population, we performed protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis via the STRING database. The entire list of putative target genes was input into STRING database and achieved a PPI network of 426 nodes and 150 edges, with PPI enrichment p-value < 1.29 × 10–10 (Fig. 3C). Moreover, using the value of node degree > 5 as filtering criteria, we identify different (eighteen) hub genes (AGO1, AGO3, AGO4, CD28, MAPK8, MECP2, PIK3R2, CBFB, IRS1, SDC2, TNRC6B, CRK, MAP3K1, MAPK14, SMAD4, CREB1, ITGB3 and PIK3CA) among which PIK3CA showed the highest degree nodes (# 14). In addition, the target genes were significantly enriched in pathways mediating PI3K/Akt, growth hormones, and insulin signaling (Additional file 1: Table S2), that all have been closely correlated with obesity-related diseases and/or breast cancer progression [93,94,95,96].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the differentially expressed EV-miRNA target genes. GO enrichment of biological processes (A) and molecular functions (B) of EV-miRNA target genes in OW/OB vs NW breast cancer patients. DAVID database was used for GO-term functional annotation analysis. Data showed the top 15 significant GO terms with FDR (false discovery rate) values of < 0.05 and a p-value of < 0.05. C. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) analysis of the deregulated EV-miRNA target genes constructed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Gene (STRING; https://string-db.org/) database. Each node indicates a protein module; the edges represent protein interactions. Different color indicates different type of interactions. (Cyan-from curated databases; Pink-experimentally determined; Khaki- text mining). PPIs with a p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant

Full size image

Comparison of the EV-derived miRNA signatures in the validation cohort

To validate the results obtained in the screening cohort, we extended our investigation to a second series of breast cancer patients having different BMI values (validation cohort, Table 4).

Table 4 Clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients of the validation cohort
Full size table

Again, EVs were extracted from the serum of these patients, and characterized by TEM, NTA and immunoblotting as previously described. Realtime PCR analysis confirmed a significant down-regulation of EV-derived let-7a in OW/Ob breast cancer patients compared to NW women. In contrast, in the breast cancer validation cohort no significant differences were detected in the levels of miR-122, miR-30d, miR-126, miR-27b, miR-4772, and miR-10a (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Quantitative RT-PCR of miRNA expression profiling data in validation cohort. qRT-PCR was conducted to measure the mRNA expression levels of let-7a, miR-122, miR-30d, miR-126, miR-27b, miR-4772 and miR-10a. The mean threshold cycle (Ct) was determined based on triplicate reactions. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the fold differences in EV-miRNA expression among the tested samples. miRNA expression was normalized against the spike-in cel-miR-39 as well as the endogenous miR-484 and miR-191. Data were reported as mean ± SEM. Significance was calculated with GraphPad Prism software by using the two-tailed t-test

Full size image

To corroborate the association of the expression levels of let-7a from circulating EVs and patients’ BMI, correlation and linear regression analyses were carried out. We found a negative correlation between let-7a levels and BMI values (r = −0.65 and p = 0.0035) in our population (Fig. 5). These results agree with previous literature showing that the levels of circulating miRNAs from let-7 family, mainly let-7a, were lower in obese subjects compared to healthy individuals. Indeed, circulating let-7a was found to be reduced in patients affected by diabetes [63], or metabolic syndrome [65], and in children with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and insulin resistance [64].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Correlations analysis between let-7a and BMI values in a validation cohort. Let-7a and BMI association was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation test. Linear regression graph, correlation coefficient (r), and statistical significance (p) were reported

Full size image

Association of let-7a with clinical outcome in breast cancer patients

To verify the potential of let-7a as a suitable classifier in predicting prognostic characteristics, including tumor grading and the proliferation marker Ki67 levels, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated. ROC analysis demonstrated that let-7a could discriminate G3 vs G1/G2 grade of breast cancer with AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.019), indicating a good performance of this individual miRNA (Fig. 6A). However, let-7a is less efficient in discriminating high Ki67 percentage in breast cancer patients with different BMI (Fig. 6B, AUC = 0.63 and p = 0.38).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Role of Let-7a in breast cancer patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of let-7a as predictor of tumor grading (G3) (A), and Ki67 level (Criterion: ≥ 20%) (B). AUC: area under the curve. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis relating let-7a levels and overall survival in breast cancer patients using Metabric (C), TGCA (D), and GSE (E) datasets. HR hazard ratio

Full size image

Finally, using the Kaplan–Meier plot online platform [55], we investigated whether the let-7a miRNA expression may be associated with breast cancer patient survival. We observed a shorter overall survival of patients with low levels of let-7a, with long-rank p value of 0.00035 in the Metabric dataset (Fig. 6C). The value of miRNA let-7a was subsequently validated in other two independent datasets (TGCA and GSE19783), which confirmed the findings driven from the initial Metabric cohort (Fig. 6D and E, respectively). Since no databases correlating specific EV-miRNA cargos and patients’ survival have been available and considering that EV-enclosed and whole plasma cell-free miRNAs may correlate in some settings [97], it is evident that the value of let-7a in EVs as a potential obesity-related miRNA associated with breast cancer progression deserves further attention.

Study limitations

Our findings provide a first line of evidence of a difference in circulating miRNA-EV profiling of breast cancer patients according to their BMI. Indeed, there are potential limitations to consider when interpreting the results. First, the relatively small sample size of the populations may hamper definitive conclusions. Moreover, although BMI is a practical and widely chosen indicator for diagnosing obesity and evaluating its negative impact among individuals, the stratification of patients’ subgroups could take into account alternative measures (i.e. waist/hip ratio, or waist circumference) considered as better anthropometric parameters than BMI to predict the risk of obesity-related diseases [98,99,100]. Certainly, future studies in a larger cohort classified by both BMI and alternative anthropometric characteristics could further clarify the role of EV-let-7a in obesity-related breast cancers.

Conclusions

EV-miRNA cargoes are emerging as potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers that can be easily detected using non-invasive procedures, including liquid biopsies. In this study, we determined the miRNA expression profile of EVs derived from the serum of normal weight breast cancer patients and overweight/obese patients and identified EV-let-7a as a novel and not yet studied miRNA that may be associated with progression of obesity-mediated breast cancer. We found a significant down-regulation of EV-derived let-7a among patients with obesity along with a negative correlation between let-7a levels and BMI values in our population. Importantly, low let-7a miRNA expression may predict increased tumor grade and poor patient survival. Because of obesity and its pathophysiological sequelae on the rise, this new knowledge could provide specific biomarkers and innovative targets that may allow a personalized management of patients affected by breast cancer and increased adiposity.

Availability of data and materials

All the data are available in a public, open-access repository.

Abbreviations

NW:

Normal weight

OW/Ob:

Overweight/Obese

BMI:

Body mass index

EV:

Extracellular vesicles

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

HER2/neu:

Human epidermal growth factor 2

AGO1:

Argonaute RISC component 1

AGO3:

Argonaute RISC catalytic component 3

AGO4:

Argonaute RISC component 4

CD28:

CD28 molecule

MAPK8:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase 8

MECP2:

Methyl-CpG binding protein 2

PIK3R2:

Phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 2

CBFB:

Core-binding factor subunit beta

IRS1:

Insulin receptor substrate 1

SDC2:

Syndecan 2

TNRC6B:

Trinucleotide repeat containing adaptor 6B

CRK:

CRK proto-oncogene, adaptor protein

MAP3K1:

Mitogen-Activated protein kinase Kinase Kinase 1

MAPK14:

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 14

SMAD4:

SMAD family member 4

CREB1:

CAMP responsive element binding protein 1

ITGB3:

Integrin subunit beta 3

PIK3CA:

Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha

PI3K:

PhosphatidylInositol 3-Kinase

Akt:

Protein-chinasi B

References

  1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. De Lorenzo A, Gratteri S, Gualtieri P, Cammarano A, Bertucci P, Di Renzo L. Why primary obesity is a disease? J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ligibel JA, Alfano CM, Courneya KS, Demark-Wahnefried W, Burger RA, Chlebowski RT, et al. American society of clinical oncology position statement on obesity and cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(31):3568–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Global BMIMC, Di Angelantonio E, Bhupathiraju SN, Wormser D, Gao P, Kaptoge S, et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andò S, Gelsomino L, Panza S, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Barone I, et al. Obesity, leptin and breast cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(1):62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barone I, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Andò S, Catalano S. The weight of obesity in breast cancer progression and metastasis: clinical and molecular perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. 2020;60:274–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barone I, Caruso A, Gelsomino L, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Catalano S, et al. Obesity and endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer: mechanistic insights and perspectives. Obes Rev. 2022;23(2):e13358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Renehan AG, Soerjomataram I, Tyson M, Egger M, Zwahlen M, Coebergh JW, et al. Incident cancer burden attributable to excess body mass index in 30 European countries. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(3):692–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung AY, Husing A, Behrens S, Krzykalla J, Obi N, Becher H, et al. Postdiagnosis weight change is associated with poorer survival in breast cancer survivors: a prospective population-based patient cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(1):18–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Walker-Thurmond K, Thun MJ. Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(17):1625–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reeves GK, Pirie K, Beral V, Green J, Spencer E, Bull D, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in relation to body mass index in the Million Women study: cohort study. BMJ. 2007;335(7630):1134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhaskaran K, Douglas I, Forbes H, dos Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, Smeeth L. Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5.24 million UK adults. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):755–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan DSM, Vieira AR, Aune D, Bandera EV, Greenwood DC, McTiernan A, et al. Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(10):1901–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Protani M, Coory M, Martin JH. Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):627–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiralerspong S, Goodwin PJ. Obesity and breast cancer prognosis: evidence, challenges, and opportunities. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(35):4203–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blair CK, Wiggins CL, Nibbe AM, Storlie CB, Prossnitz ER, Royce M, et al. Obesity and survival among a cohort of breast cancer patients is partially mediated by tumor characteristics. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Copson ER, Cutress RI, Maishman T, Eccles BK, Gerty S, Stanton L, et al. Obesity and the outcome of young breast cancer patients in the UK: the POSH study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(1):101–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Osman MA, Hennessy BT. Obesity correlation with metastases development and response to first-line metastatic chemotherapy in breast cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2015;9:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Majed B, Senouci K, Asselain B. Shortened survival and more metastasis recurrences among overweight breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2009;15(5):557–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alarcon Rojas CA, Alvarez-Banuelos MT, Morales-Romero J, Suarez-Diaz H, Hernandez-Fonseca JC, Contreras-Alarcon G. Breast cancer: metastasis, molecular subtypes, and overweight and obesity in Veracruz. Mexico Clin Breast Cancer. 2019;19(1):e166–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barone I, Giordano C, Bonofiglio D, Andò S, Catalano S. Leptin, obesity and breast cancer: progress to understanding the molecular connections. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016;31:83–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clement E, Lazar I, Attane C, Carrie L, Dauvillier S, Ducoux-Petit M, et al. Adipocyte extracellular vesicles carry enzymes and fatty acids that stimulate mitochondrial metabolism and remodeling in tumor cells. EMBO J. 2020;39(3):e102525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Jafari N, Kolla M, Meshulam T, Shafran JS, Qiu Y, Casey AN, et al. Adipocyte-derived exosomes may promote breast cancer progression in type 2 diabetes. Sci Signal. 2021;14(710):eabj2807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jafari N, Llevenes P, Denis GV. Exosomes as novel biomarkers in metabolic disease and obesity-related cancers. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(6):327–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Moraes JA, Encarnacao C, Franco VA, Xavier Botelho LG, Rodrigues GP, Ramos-Andrade I, et al. Adipose tissue-derived extracellular vesicles and the tumor microenvironment: revisiting the hallmarks of cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(13):3328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kwan HY, Chen M, Xu K, Chen B. The impact of obesity on adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(23):7275–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bond ST, Calkin AC, Drew BG. Adipose-derived extracellular vesicles: systemic messengers and metabolic regulators in health and disease. Front Physiol. 2022;13:837001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. La Camera G, Gelsomino L, Malivindi R, Barone I, Panza S, De Rose D, et al. Adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell malignancy through HIF-1alpha activity. Cancer Lett. 2021;521:155–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. La Camera G, Gelsomino L, Caruso A, Panza S, Barone I, Bonofiglio D, et al. The emerging role of extracellular vesicles in endocrine resistant breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(5):1160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Giordano C, La Camera G, Gelsomino L, Barone I, Bonofiglio D, Andò S, et al. The biology of exosomes in breast cancer progression: dissemination, immune evasion and metastatic colonization. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(8):2179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmadi M, Rezaie J. Tumor cells derived-exosomes as angiogenenic agents: possible therapeutic implications. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jafari R, Rahbarghazi R, Ahmadi M, Hassanpour M, Rezaie J. Hypoxic exosomes orchestrate tumorigenesis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Z, Chen JQ, Liu JL, Tian L. Exosomes in tumor microenvironment: novel transporters and biomarkers. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):297.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Bullock MD, Silva AM, Kanlikilicer-Unaldi P, Filant J, Rashed MH, Sood AK, et al. Exosomal non-coding rnas: diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic applications in cancer. Noncoding RNA. 2015;1(1):53–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Klinge CM. Non-coding RNAs in breast cancer: intracellular and intercellular communication. Noncoding RNA. 2018;4(4):40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cardinali B, Tasso R, Piccioli P, Ciferri MC, Quarto R, Del Mastro L. Circulating miRNAs in breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(9):2317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Peng Y, Croce CM. The role of MicroRNAs in human cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2016;1:15004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen B, Li H, Zeng X, Yang P, Liu X, Zhao X, et al. Roles of microRNA on cancer cell metabolism. J Transl Med. 2012;10:228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Li C, Zhou T, Chen J, Li R, Chen H, Luo S, et al. The role of exosomal miRNAs in cancer. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hannafon BN, Trigoso YD, Calloway CL, Zhao YD, Lum DH, Welm AL, et al. Plasma exosome microRNAs are indicative of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2016;18(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodriguez-Martinez A, de Miguel-Perez D, Ortega FG, Garcia-Puche JL, Robles-Fernandez I, Exposito J, et al. Exosomal miRNA profile as complementary tool in the diagnostic and prediction of treatment response in localized breast cancer under neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sueta A, Yamamoto Y, Tomiguchi M, Takeshita T, Yamamoto-Ibusuki M, Iwase H. Differential expression of exosomal miRNAs between breast cancer patients with and without recurrence. Oncotarget. 2017;8(41):69934–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Todorova VK, Byrum SD, Gies AJ, Haynie C, Smith H, Reyna NS, et al. Circulating exosomal microRNAs as predictive biomarkers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(2):613–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sueta A, Fujiki Y, Goto-Yamaguchi L, Tomiguchi M, Yamamoto-Ibusuki M, Iwase H, et al. Exosomal miRNA profiles of triple-negative breast cancer in neoadjuvant treatment. Oncol Lett. 2021;22(6):819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Eirin A, Meng Y, Zhu XY, Li Y, Saadiq IM, Jordan KL, et al. The micro-RNA cargo of extracellular vesicles released by human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells is modified by obesity. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:660851.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim Y, Kim OK. Potential roles of adipocyte extracellular vesicle-derived miRNAs in obesity-mediated insulin resistance. Adv Nutr. 2021;12(2):566–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhou Y, Tan C. miRNAs in adipocyte-derived extracellular vesicles: multiple roles in development of obesity-associated disease. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Giordano C, Gelsomino L, Barone I, Panza S, Augimeri G, Bonofiglio D, et al. Leptin modulates exosome biogenesis in breast cancer cells: an additional mechanism in cell-to-cell communication. J Clin Med. 2019;8(7):1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Barone I, Giordano C, Malivindi R, Lanzino M, Rizza P, Casaburi I, et al. Estrogens and PTP1B function in a novel pathway to regulate aromatase enzymatic activity in breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2012;153(11):5157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Szklarczyk D, Morris JH, Cook H, Kuhn M, Wyder S, Simonovic M, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D362–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ahmed SH, Espinoza-Sanchez NA, El-Damen A, Fahim SA, Badawy MA, Greve B, et al. Small extracellular vesicle-encapsulated miR-181b-5p, miR-222-3p and let-7a-5p: Next generation plasma biopsy-based diagnostic biomarkers for inflammatory breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(4):e0250642.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Binderup HG, Madsen JS, Heegaard NHH, Houlind K, Andersen RF, Brasen CL. Quantification of microRNA levels in plasma - Impact of preanalytical and analytical conditions. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0201069.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Poel D, Buffart TE, Oosterling-Jansen J, Verheul HM, Voortman J. Evaluation of several methodological challenges in circulating miRNA qPCR studies in patients with head and neck cancer. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(3):e454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Lanczky A, Nagy A, Bottai G, Munkacsy G, Szabo A, Santarpia L, et al. miRpower: a web-tool to validate survival-associated miRNAs utilizing expression data from 2178 breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(3):439–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Thery C, Witwer KW, Aikawa E, Alcaraz MJ, Anderson JD, Andriantsitohaina R, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles 2018 (MISEV2018): a position statement of the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles and update of the MISEV2014 guidelines. J Extracell Vesicles. 2018;7(1):1535750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kim DK, Lee J, Kim SR, Choi DS, Yoon YJ, Kim JH, et al. EVpedia: a community web portal for extracellular vesicles research. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(6):933–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Keerthikumar S, Chisanga D, Ariyaratne D, Al Saffar H, Anand S, Zhao K, et al. ExoCarta: a web-based compendium of exosomal cargo. J Mol Biol. 2016;428(4):688–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ibrahim AM, Said MM, Hilal AM, Medhat AM, Abd Elsalam IM. Candidate circulating microRNAs as potential diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for the monitoring of locally advanced breast cancer patients. Tumour Biol. 2020;42(10):1010428320963811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Heneghan HM, Miller N, Lowery AJ, Sweeney KJ, Newell J, Kerin MJ. Circulating microRNAs as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):499–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Elghoroury EA, ElDine HG, Kamel SA, Abdelrahman AH, Mohammed A, Kamel MM, et al. Evaluation of miRNA-21 and miRNA Let-7 as prognostic markers in patients with breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18(4):e721–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Khalighfard S, Alizadeh AM, Irani S, Omranipour R. Plasma miR-21, miR-155, miR-10b, and Let-7a as the potential biomarkers for the monitoring of breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Sabah Younus N, Abdul-Munim Sharba Z, Fakhry AM. Gene expression of miRNAs Let-7aassociated with diabetes in Iraqi population. Arch Razi Inst. 2021;76(4):1077–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Oses M, Medrano M, Margareto Sanchez J, Portillo MP, Aguilera CM, Altmae S, et al. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells-expressed miRNA profiles derived from children with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. Pediatr Obes. 2022;17(12):e12966.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Cerda A, Amaral AA, de Oliveira R, Moraes TI, Braga AA, Graciano-Saldarriaga ME, et al. Peripheral blood miRome identified miR-155 as potential biomarker of MetS and cardiometabolic risk in obese patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Li M, Zou X, Xia T, Wang T, Liu P, Zhou X, et al. A five-miRNA panel in plasma was identified for breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer Med. 2019;8(16):7006–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Wu X, Somlo G, Yu Y, Palomares MR, Li AX, Zhou W, et al. De novo sequencing of circulating miRNAs identifies novel markers predicting clinical outcome of locally advanced breast cancer. J Transl Med. 2012;10:42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Freres P, Josse C, Bovy N, Boukerroucha M, Struman I, Bours V, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients induces miR-34a and miR-122 expression. J Cell Physiol. 2015;230(2):473–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Willeit P, Skroblin P, Moschen AR, Yin X, Kaudewitz D, Zampetaki A, et al. Circulating MicroRNA-122 is associated with the risk of new-onset metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2017;66(2):347–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Okamatsu-Ogura Y, Matsushita M, Bariuan JV, Nagaya K, Tsubota A, Saito M. Association of circulating exosomal miR-122 levels with BAT activity in healthy humans. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hess AL, Larsen LH, Udesen PB, Sanz Y, Larsen TM, Dalgaard LT. Levels of circulating miR-122 are associated with weight loss and metabolic syndrome. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020;28(3):493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Thompson MD, Cismowski MJ, Serpico M, Pusateri A, Brigstock DR. Elevation of circulating microRNA levels in obese children compared to healthy controls. Clin Obes. 2017;7(4):216–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lin H, Tas E, Borsheim E, Mercer KE. Circulating miRNA signatures associated with insulin resistance in adolescents with obesity. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2020;13:4929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Brandt S, Roos J, Inzaghi E, Kotnik P, Kovac J, Battelino T, et al. Circulating levels of miR-122 and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in pre-pubertal obese children. Pediatr Obes. 2018;13(3):175–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Carreras-Badosa G, Bonmati A, Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Guindo-Martinez M, Torrents D, et al. Altered circulating miRNA expression profile in pregestational and gestational obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):E1446–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zampetaki A, Kiechl S, Drozdov I, Willeit P, Mayr U, Prokopi M, et al. Plasma microRNA profiling reveals loss of endothelial miR-126 and other microRNAs in type 2 diabetes. Circ Res. 2010;107(6):810–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Nunez Lopez YO, Garufi G, Seyhan AA. Altered levels of circulating cytokines and microRNAs in lean and obese individuals with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Mol Biosyst. 2016;13(1):106–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Stevic I, Muller V, Weber K, Fasching PA, Karn T, Marme F, et al. Specific microRNA signatures in exosomes of triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy within the GeparSixto trial. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Can U, Buyukinan M, Yerlikaya FH. The investigation of circulating microRNAs associated with lipid metabolism in childhood obesity. Pediatr Obes. 2016;11(3):228–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Milagro FI, Miranda J, Portillo MP, Fernandez-Quintela A, Campion J, Martinez JA. High-throughput sequencing of microRNAs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: identification of potential weight loss biomarkers. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Olson J, Sheean P, Matthews L, Chitambar CR, Banerjee A, Visotcky A, et al. Circulating miRNAs as early indicators of diet and physical activity response in women with metastatic breast cancer. Future Sci OA. 2021;7(4):FSO694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Pirola CJ, Fernandez Gianotti T, Castano GO, Mallardi P, San Martino J, Ledesma MMGL, et al. Circulating microRNA signature in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: from serum non-coding RNAs to liver histology and disease pathogenesis. Gut. 2015;64(5):800–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Wang R, Hong J, Cao Y, Shi J, Gu W, Ning G, et al. Elevated circulating microRNA-122 is associated with obesity and insulin resistance in young adults. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(3):291–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Jones A, Danielson KM, Benton MC, Ziegler O, Shah R, Stubbs RS, et al. miRNA signatures of insulin resistance in obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017;25(10):1734–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Mohany KM, Al Rugaie O, Al-Wutayd O, Al-Nafeesah A. Investigation of the levels of circulating miR-29a, miR-122, sestrin 2 and inflammatory markers in obese children with/without type 2 diabetes: a case control study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Ortega FJ, Mercader JM, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Rovira O, Guerra E, Esteve E, et al. Profiling of circulating microRNAs reveals common microRNAs linked to type 2 diabetes that change with insulin sensitization. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(5):1375–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Asgari R, Rezaie J. Differential expression of serum exosomal miRNAs in breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Adv Pharm Bull. 2022;12(4):858–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Schrauder MG, Strick R, Schulz-Wendtland R, Strissel PL, Kahmann L, Loehberg CR, et al. Circulating micro-RNAs as potential blood-based markers for early stage breast cancer detection. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(1):e29770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Thomopoulou K, Papadaki C, Monastirioti A, Koronakis G, Mala A, Kalapanida D, et al. MicroRNAs regulating tumor immune response in the prediction of the outcome in patients with breast cancer. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:668534.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Jusoh AR, Mohan SV, Lu Ping T, Tengku Din T, Haron J, Romli RC, et al. Plasma circulating miRNAs profiling for identification of potential breast cancer early detection biomarkers. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(5):1375–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Hijmans JG, Diehl KJ, Bammert TD, Kavlich PJ, Lincenberg GM, Greiner JJ, et al. Influence of overweight and obesity on circulating inflammation-related microRNA. Microrna. 2018;7(2):148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Rovira-Llopis S, Diaz-Rua R, Grau-Del Valle C, Iannantuoni F, Abad-Jimenez Z, Bosch-Sierra N, et al. Characterization of differentially expressed circulating miRNAs in metabolically healthy versus unhealthy obesity. Biomedicines. 2021;9(3):321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Perry RJ, Shulman GI. Mechanistic links between obesity, insulin, and cancer. Trends Cancer. 2020;6(2):75–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. He Y, Sun MM, Zhang GG, Yang J, Chen KS, Xu WW, et al. Targeting PI3K/Akt signal transduction for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Subramani R, Nandy SB, Pedroza DA, Lakshmanaswamy R. Role of growth hormone in breast cancer. Endocrinology. 2017;158(6):1543–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Hjelholt A, Hogild M, Bak AM, Arlien-Soborg MC, Baek A, Jessen N, et al. Growth hormone and obesity. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49(2):239–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Cardinali B, Tasso R, Piccioli P, Ciferri MC, Quarto R, Del Mastro L. Circulating miRNAs in breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:2317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Lear SA, James PT, Ko GT, Kumanyika S. Appropriateness of waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio cutoffs for different ethnic groups. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(1):42–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Martinez GS, Linares C, Ayuso A, Kendrovski V, Boeckmann M, Diaz J. Heat-health action plans in Europe: challenges ahead and how to tackle them. Environ Res. 2019;176:108548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ahmad N, Adam SI, Nawi AM, Hassan MR, Ghazi HF. Abdominal obesity indicators: waist circumference or waist-to-hip ratio in Malaysian adults population. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by a special award to the Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences of University of Calabria (Italy) (Department of Excellence, Italian Law 232/2016) from the Italian Ministry of Research and University (MIUR), by the AIRC Investigator Grant (IG) #21414 and BANDO PRIN 2017 #2017EKMFTN_001 to S. Catalano; by BANDO PRIN 2017 #2017EKMFTN_006 to M. Giuliano; by the AIRC Investigator Grant (IG) #26246 to S. Andò, by BANDO PRIN 2017 # 2017WNKSLR_005 to I. Barone; National Research, Development and Innovation Office (PharmaLab, RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00015 and 2020-1.1.6-JÖVŐ-2021-00013 to B.G. “Sistema Integrato di Laboratori per L’Ambiente-(SILA) PONa3_00341”.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ines Barone and Luca Gelsomino are joint first authors

  2. Cinzia Giordano and Stefania Catalano are joint senior authors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Arcavacata Di Rende (CS), 87036, Rende, Cosenza, Italy

    Ines Barone, Luca Gelsomino, Felice Maria Accattatis, Francesca Giordano, Daniela Bonofiglio, Sebastiano Andò, Cinzia Giordano & Stefania Catalano

  2. Centro Sanitario, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, Arcavacata Di Rende (CS), 87036, Rende, Cosenza, Italy

    Ines Barone, Luca Gelsomino, Felice Maria Accattatis, Salvatore Panza, Daniela Bonofiglio, Sebastiano Andò, Cinzia Giordano & Stefania Catalano

  3. Departments of Bioinformatics and Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, 1094, Budapest, Hungary

    Balazs Gyorffy

  4. TTK Cancer Biomarker Research Group, 1117, Budapest, Hungary

    Balazs Gyorffy

  5. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Mario Giuliano, Grazia Arpino, Carmine De Angelis & Pietro De Placido

  6. Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

    Bianca Maria Veneziani

Authors
  1. Ines Barone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luca Gelsomino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Felice Maria Accattatis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesca Giordano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Balazs Gyorffy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Salvatore Panza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mario Giuliano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bianca Maria Veneziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Grazia Arpino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Carmine De Angelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pietro De Placido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Daniela Bonofiglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Sebastiano Andò
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Cinzia Giordano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Stefania Catalano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IB, CG and SC designed and supervised the study. MG, BMV, GA, CDA and PDP provided breast cancer patients’ blood samples and clinical informations. LG, SP, and FMA performed the experiments. IB, CG, SC, FG and DB analyzed the data. BG conducted the bioinformatics analysis. IB, CG and SC wrote the original draft. DB, MG and SA revised the manuscript. IB, SC, MG and SA provided funding. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ines Barone or Stefania Catalano.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of University of Naples Federico II (n. 107/05).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

TaqMan Advanced miRNA Assays used for miRNA relative quantification (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The manufacturer assay ID is reported. Table S2. Enriched KEGG pathways of the deregulated EV-miRNA target genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barone, I., Gelsomino, L., Accattatis, F.M. et al. Analysis of circulating extracellular vesicle derived microRNAs in breast cancer patients with obesity: a potential role for Let-7a. J Transl Med 21, 232 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04075-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04075-w

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us