Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evidence of pyroptosis and ferroptosis extensively involved in autoimmune diseases at the single-cell transcriptome level

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 20, Article number: 363 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Approximately 8–9% of the world’s population is affected by autoimmune diseases, and yet the mechanism of autoimmunity trigger is largely understudied. Two unique cell death modalities, ferroptosis and pyroptosis, provide a new perspective on the mechanisms leading to autoimmune diseases, and development of new treatment strategies.

Methods

Using scRNA-seq datasets, the aberrant trend of ferroptosis and pyroptosis-related genes were analyzed in several representative autoimmune diseases (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, vitiligo, multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, Crohn’s disease, and experimental autoimmune orchitis). Cell line models were also assessed using bulk RNA-seq and qPCR.

Results

A substantial difference was observed between normal and autoimmune disease samples involving ferroptosis and pyroptosis. In the present study, ferroptosis and pyroptosis showed an imbalance in different keratinocyte lineages of psoriatic skinin addition to a unique pyroptosis-sensitive keratinocyte subset in atopic dermatitis (AD) skin. The results also revealed that pyroptosis and ferroptosis are involved in epidermal melanocyte destruction in vitiligo. Aberrant ferroptosis has been detected in multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, Crohn’s disease, and autoimmune orchitis. Cell line models adopted in the study also identified pro-inflammatory factors that can drive changes in ferroptosis and pyroptosis.

Conclusion

These results provide a unique perspective on the involvement of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in the pathological process of autoimmune diseases at the scRNA-seq level. IFN-γ is a critical inducer of pyroptosis sensitivity, and has been identified in two cell line models.

Introduction

Cell death plays a critical role in embryonic development, cell fate determination, and maintenance of immune homeostasis and is categorized into necroptosis, pyroptosis, apoptosis, ferroptosis, and necrosis [1]. However, the distinction between these cell death modalities remains to be further investigated. Necroptosis may be the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease, skin inflammation, severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, alcohol/ non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, and drug-induced liver injury. It may be triggered by TLR4/TLR3 stimulation, DNA-dependent activator of IFN regulatory factors (DAI), TNF-TNFR1 signaling, FASL-FAS signaling, TRAIL-TRAILR signaling, and IFN-α/β-IFNAR1 signaling, and intertwined with apoptosis [2]. Apoptosis, the most studied type of “programmed or regulated cell death” (PCD), ranges from inflammation and cancer to autoimmune diseases mediated by FASL-FAS signaling [3]. Unlike apoptosis, necrosis involves the release of intracellular contents and elicits acute exudative inflammation in surrounding tissues [4]. Ferroptosis and pyroptosis have been recently identified as forms of programmed cell death amd have become novel potential therapeutic targets for cancer therapy [5, 6].

Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent cell death modality, leads to toxic accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Dysregulation of iron metabolism and phospholipid peroxidation can lead to ferroptosis. Owing to its unique mechanism, ferroptosis might be involved in cell fate decisions, inflammatory progress, and several pathologies, such as cardiomyopathy [7] and acute kidney injury [8]. A growing body of research supports the notion that ferroptosis is involved in the response to immunotherapy [6], such as the different sensitivities of immune cell types and the increasing ferroptosis sensitivity of target cells mediated by IFN-γ [9]. Therefore, regulating the sensitivity to ferroptosis in cancer cells can reshape the tumor microenvironment, which can be targeted in antitumor therapy [10]. However, it remains unclear whether ferroptosis is related to dysregulated immune responses. Ferroptosis has been previously reported to trigger proinflammatory state in the development of necroinflammatory diseases [11]. Dysregulated immune systems also lead to autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The relationship between inflammatory progress and ferroptosis prompted us to investigate whether ferroptosis is involved in the development of autoimmune diseases [12]. In the S100-induced autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) mouse model, ferroptosis caused hepatitis by downregulating glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), and was inhibited by the Ferrostatin-1 mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway [13]. Ferroptosis also exists in concanavalin A-induced AIH [14]. Recent evidence has shown that neutrophil ferroptosis is a key driver of neutropenia in SLE, whichis mediated by autoantibodies and interferon-α (IFN-α). As a result, GPX4 expression is downregulated and elevation of lipid-reactive oxygen species is induced [15]. However, the pathological role of ferroptosis in autoimmune diseases has rarely been explored.

Pyroptosis is a newly discovered modality of programmed cell death that is mediated by pyroptotic caspases. The modality features rapid plasma-membrane rupture and initiates the release of proinflammatory intracellular contents [16]. While pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and LPS are recognized by corresponding inflammasomes and caspases, such as caspase-1 (CASP1), caspase-3 (CASP3), caspase-11 (Casp11) and counterpart caspase-4 (CASP4), and caspase-5 (CASP5) in human, respectively to induce the activation of pyroptosis pathways, increasing evidence suggests that pyroptosis is deeply involved in infectious diseases [17], hematologic disorders [18], and tumorigenesis [19]. In addition, PAMPs and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMPs)-induced activated inflammasomes are involved in the initiation of chronic inflammation and autoimmune diseases [17], which also initiate pyroptosis [20]. Many factors, including pore-forming toxin, protease, ubiquitin ligase, Rho-inactivating toxin, dsDNA, and flagellin, can activate caspase-1, and LPS activates caspase-4/5/11, which subsequently cleaves GSDMD, leading to the formation of lethal pores and the release of proinflammatory factors [21]. A landmark study showed that interferon-γ (IFN-γ) upregulated GSDMB expression in target cells and granzyme A (GZMA) secreted by cytotoxic lymphocytes (CTLs) cleaved GSDMB to induce pyroptosis [22]. The CTLs participate in autoimmune and degenerative central nervous system (CNS) diseases, such as MS and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Hyperactive CTLs causes cell death in various CNS cell types to some extent via cytotoxic granule-induced membrane lysis, Fas ligand, TNF, and related molecules [23]. Interestingly, caspase-3 or CTL-secreted granzyme B (GZMB) cleaves gasdermin E (GSDME) at the same site, which activates the pyroptosis of target cells [24]. Previous studies have shown that GSDMB-induced excessive pyroptosis might lead to autoimmune disorders, such as asthma and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [25]. Based on this, pyroptosis is considered to have implications in many autoimmune disorders [26], however, this aspect remains understudied.

In the present work, of the goal was to investigate the mechanisms in which ferroptosis and pyroptosis are involved in several autoimmune diseases (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis [AD], vitiligo, multiple sclerosis [MS], systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease [SSc-ILD], Crohn’s disease [CD], and experimental autoimmune orchitis [EAO]) at the single cell RNAseq (scRNA-seq) level. scRNA-seq is a powerful tool for characterizing physiological and pathological processes at the single-cell level [27,28,29]. Notably, among the results, we confirmed the sensitivity of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in different target cell types of different autoimmune diseases, such as cutaneous keratinocytes of patients with AD. Imbalances in ferroptosis and pyroptosis during the development of psoriasis were also identified. In addition, vitiligo may be driven by pyroptosis and ferroptosis of epidermal melanocytes. Ferroptosis is involved in the pathologies of MS, SSc-ILD, CD, and EAO. Interestingly, results showed that the proinflammatory factor IFN-γ increased the sensitivity of pyroptosis in the B16 cell line model and THP-1 differentiation model, but had less effect on ferroptosis, which was dependent on concentration and exposure time. In summary, our results provide a link between autoimmune diseases and ferroptosis and pyroptosis.

Methods

scRNA-seq datasets

The scRNA-seq datasets of 5 healthy donor skin samples and 8 vitiligo-affected skin samples were acquired from the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) with accession number PRJCA006797 (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/bioproject/browse/PRJCA006797) (Table 1). The scRNA-seq datasets of lesional/non-lesional skin biopsies of AD patients were obtained from GEO database (Accession NO. GSE147424). The datasets of skin biopsy tissues from 13 psoriasis patients and 5 healthy volunteers were acquired from GSE151177. Single nuclei RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) datasets of brain samples of control and MS patients were obtained from GSE118257. And the droplet-based scRNA-seq datasets of human healthy and SSc-ILD lungs were got from GSE128169. The scRNA-seq datasets of terminal ileum of childhood onset Crohn’s disease and matched healthy controls were downloaded from https://cellgeni.cog.sanger.ac.uk/gutcellatlas/pediatric_RAWCOUNTS_cellxgene.h5ad. And the scRNA-seq datasets of unilateral decapsulated testes from mouse experimental and control group were obtained from GSM5563668 and GSM5563669.

Table 1 Information about the scRNA-seq datasets used in our study
Full size table

Quality control

Cells from psoriasis patients and healthy volunteers were filtered with a gene expression number per cell between 200 and 10,000, and the mitochondrial percentage per cell was below 50. Cells from the vitiligo-affected skin samples and healthy skin samples were filtered with a gene expression number per cell between 200 and 10,000, and the mitochondrial percentage per cell was below 25. And cells from lesional/non-lesional skin biopsies of AD patients were filtered with a gene expression number per cell between 200 and 10,000. Quality control of cells from brain samples was applied to filter out low-quality cells with < 200 or > 10,000 expressed genes. Cells from lung samples were filtered with a gene expression number per cell between 200 and 10,000, and the mitochondrial percentage per cell was below 25. The processed dataset of terminal ileum was converted into h5Seurat data, and used without any additional filtration. And quality control of cells from decapsulated testes was applied to filter out low-quality cells with either (1) < 200 or > 10,000 expressed genes or (2) < 25 mitochondrial percentage.

Data processing

Datasets of vitiligo skin biopsies, psoriasis skin biopsies, AD skin biopsies, MS brain cells, SSc-ILD lung biopsies, decapsulated testes, and its counterparts, were processed in Seurat V4, integrated by “merge” function, and normalized by “NormalizeData” function. Then “FindVariableFeatures”, “ScaleData”, “RunPCA”, “FindNeighbors”, and “SCTransform” were used to process the datasets. Next, “RunHarmony (object, group.by.vars = ”orig.ident”)” and “RunUMAP(object, reduction = ”harmony” were used, while clusters were calculated using the “FindClusters” function with a resolution of 0.5. The Seurat file of terminal ileum was used without any additional data processing.

Separation and identification of cell types

Cluster of Melanocytes was characterized by the high expression of DCT, TYRP1, PMEL, and MLANA in vitiligo skin and its counterparts-derived cells. Ketatinocytes were identified by the high expression of KRT14, KRT1, KRT10, and KRT15. Fibroblasts were identified by feature genes including COL1A1, DCN, SFRP2, and TWIST2, while other cell types were identified by below genesets, (1) smooth muscles: TAGLN, ACTA2, and NR2F2; (2) ECs: AQP1, CLEC14A, PECAM1, and ECSCR.1; (3) Langerhans: PCGBP, CD207, CD1A, and S100B; (4) T cells: PTPRC, CD3D, CD3E, TRBC2, TRAC, and TRGC2; (5) myeloid cells: PTPRC, CD14, FCGR3A, and CD1C. Ketatinocytes of psoriasis skin biopsies and its counterparts were further identified according to S.Basale, S.Granulosum&S.Spinosum, and S.Corneum based on the expression of signature genes presenting on Fig. 1B. Clusters of AD skin biopsies and its counterpart-derived cells were characterized by feature genes described in Additional file 2: Fig. S2B, then renamed and merged into several major clusters by the “RenameIdents” function.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The expression patterns of ferroptosis and pyroptosis-related genes in different keratinocyte subtypes. (A) Dot plot shows the expression levels of pro-ferroptosis and ferroptosis-resistant genes in total keratinocytes derived from psoriasis skin and healthy skin. (B) Dot plot shows the expression levels of feature genes in different keratinocyte subsets. (C) The expression levels of GPX4, FTL, FTH1, NR4A1, NFE2L2, and MT1G in different subsets. (D) Quantification of pyroptosis geneset score of keratinocytes in psoriasis skin and healthy skin. (E) Dot plot shows the expression levels of CASP1, CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, CASP3, GSDMA, GSDMB, GSDMC, GSDMD, and GSDME in different keratinocyte subsets derived from psoriasis skin and healthy skin. (F) Schematic depiction of the relationship of psoriasis pathological process with ferroptosis/apoptosis/pyroptosis

Full size image

Clusters of OPCs were characterized by the high expression of SOX6, OLIG2, PDGFRA, and BCAN in brain cells. Neurons were identified by the high expression of SNAP25 and GABRB2. Oligodendrocytes were identified by the feature genes PLP1 and CNP. And astrocytes were characterized by the high expression of APOE, GJA1, and AQP4, while other cell types were identified by below genesets, (1) immune cells: PTPRC, CD14, and IGHM; (2) EC/VSM: CLEC14A and PECAM1.

Macrophages were identified by the high expression of CD14, FCGR3A, ITGAX, SPP1, APOE, FABP4, and IL1B in lung-derived cells. Club/Goblet/Basal cells were characterized by the high expression of CAPS and TPPP3. Alveolar Type 1/2 cells were identified by the high expression of SCGB3A1, SLPI, SFTPA1, and SFTPC. Other cell types were identified by below genesets, (1) ECs: CD34, FCN3, CLDN5, ACKR1, and VWF; (2) Fibroblasts: DCN and LUM; (3) Smooth Muscles/Pericytes: TAGLN and ACTA2; (4) Mast cells: TPSAB1 and TPSB2.

Epithelial cells featured the high expression of EPCAM and FABP1 in terminal ileum-derived cells. Fibroblasts were identified by the high expression of COL1A1, COL1A2, and DCN. And myeloid cells were identified by these feature genes of PTPRC, CD14, FCGR3A, ITGAM, and CSF1R. Clusters of decapsulated testes were characterized by those feature genes showed in Additional file 7: Fig. S7B.

Calculating module scores

The AddModuleScore function from Seurat v4.0 was used to score target cells according to the expression of signature gene lists. We grouped the expression values of human ferroptosis driver gene set (Additional file 8: Table S1) [30], constructed a signature that we named the “ferroptosis driver” module, and scored target cell types using the “AddModule Score” function. And we grouped the expression values of human ferroptosis suppressor gene set (Additional file 9: Table S2), constructed a signature that we named the “ferroptosis suppressor” module. What’s more, the mouse gene lists were by Additional file 10: Table S3 and Additional file 11: Table S4. And finally, we grouped the expression values of these pyroptosis-related genes (mouse: Casp1, Casp11, Casp6, Casp8, Gsdma1, Gsdma2, Gsdma3, Gsdmc, Gsdmd, and Gsdme; human: CASP1, CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, GSDMA, GSDMB, GSDMC, GSDMD, and GSDME), constructed a signature that was named the “pyroptosis” module. These geneset scores were showed as violin plots and box-plots.

Quantitative PCR analysis

B16 cell line was treated with mouse IFN-γ (5 ng/mL or 10 ng/mL) (C746, Novoprotein Scientific) and collected at different time points (12 h, 24 h, and 48 h). Total RNA was isolated from Trizol (15596026, Invitrogen) treated cells. cDNA was synthesized using HiScript II Q RT SuperMix for qPCR (+ gDNA wiper) kit (R223-0, Vazyme). qPCR was performed on cDNA using Hieff qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Low Rox Plus) (11202ES08, YEASEN). Gene expression was quantified using the following primers: mouse Gapdh forward: CAGTGGCAAAGTGGAGATTGTTG; mouse Gapdh reverse: TCGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTGAT; mouse Gsdmd forward: CACCATGGCCTCAATGTGCT; mouse Gsdmd reverse: GCAAGCCTTCACCTCAGCAT; mouse Gsdme forward: TGCAACTTCTAAGTCTGGTGACC; mouse Gsdme reverse: CTCCACAACCACTGGACTGAG; mouse Casp1 forward: GCCGTGGAGAGAAACAAGGAGTG; mouse Casp1 reverse: TCAATGAAAAGTGAGCCCCTGACAG; mouse Casp8 forward: TCCTGTGCTTGGACTACATCC; mouse Casp8 reverse: TTCCCGCAGCCTCAGAAATAG; mouse Gpx4 forward: ATAAGAACGGCTGCGTGGTGAAG; mouse Gpx4 reverse: TAGAGATAGCACGGCAGGTCCTTC; mouse Slc7a11 forward: TGGCGGTGACCTTCTCTGA; mouse Slc7a11 reverse: ACAAAGATCGGGACTGCTAATGA; mouse Slc3a2 forward: TGCTCAGGCTGACATTGTAGC; mouse Slc3a2 reverse: TCAGCCAAGTACAAGGGTGC. Fold changes in mRNA expression were calculated by the ΔΔCt method using Gapdh as an endogenous control. Results are expressed as fold change by normalizing to the controls. And the expression of Gsdmc, Casp6, Gsdma, Gsdma2, Gsdma3, Casp11, and Ascl4 was too low and didn’t present.

THP-1 differentiation and bulk RNA-seq analysis

The THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1 × P/S. And THP-1 cells were seeded into 25cm2 flasks at the density of 5 × 105 cells/flask and were cultured with 10 ng/mL PMA (abs9107, absin) for 24 h. Then these cells were cultured with medium without stimulatory factor, or supplemented with IFN-γ (50 ng/mL)( abs04123, absin) and LPS (15 ng/mL)( L8880, Solarbio), or only IFN-γ(50 ng/mL) for further 5 days. RNA were extracted from 1 × 106 THP-1 cells or THP-1-derived cells of each sample, and sequenced using RNA-seq platform at Guangzhou Huayin Health Medical Group. Sequencing was run on an Illumina HiSeqTM 2000, and DESeq2 was used for gene expression analysis.

Results

Imbalances of ferroptosis and pyroptosis involved in the development of psoriasis

Psoriasis is an autoimmune disease mediated by overactive IL17 secreting type 17 T-cells (such as Th17 and Tc17) and defective negative regulatory networks (such as dysfunctional Tregs). Many researchers have focused on immune-related factors in the development of psoriasis, but haveignored the cell-fate transition of hyperproliferative keratinocytes themselves [31]. As part of this work, scRNA-seq analysis of psoriasis and control skin-derived cells were performed to identify the cell fate transition of nonimmune subsets (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Interestingly, compared with the control groups, the psoriatic skin-derived keratinocytes and fibroblasts showed a lower ferroptosis driver gene score (Additional file 8: Table S1 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1B). Some important ferroptosis driver genes, such as RPL8 [32], NCOA4 [33], and ALOXE3 [34], are expressed at low levels in the keratinocyte population in psoriasis. In addition, some critical ferroptosis suppressor genes, such as GPX4 [35], FTL, and FTH1 [36], are expressed at high levels in the keratinocyte population in psoriasis (Fig. 1A). These differences implied that ferroptosis is involved in the development of psoriasis. Keratinocyte cells were subdivided into stratum corneum (S.C, with high expression of KRT23, KRT80, SPRR2G, LCE3D, and CDSN), stratum granulosum, stratum spinosum (S.G & S.S, with high expression of FABP5, KRT10, and KRT1), and stratum basale (S.B, with high expression of MKI67, KRT14, and KRT5) (Fig. 1B) [37]. Psoriasis skin-derived S.B cells expressed GPX4, FTL, and FTH1 at high levels, whereas control skin-derived S.G & S.S cells expressed high levels of GPX4, FTH1, NR4A1, NFE2L2, and MT1G (Fig. 1C). Moreover, control skin-derived S.B and S.G & S.S cells expressed RPL8 at high levels, and control skin-derived S.C cells expressed high levels of NCOA4 and ALOXE3 (Additional file 1: Fig. S1C). These evidences indicated the ferroptosis-related pathways changed in psoriasis skin, and the S.B cells were given a combat advantage of ferroptosis, which is consistent with the phenotype of apoptosis-resistant psoriatic keratinocytes [38, 39]. A recent study showed that the partial index of active ferroptosis-related cell death in bulk psoriasis skin cells was higher than that in bulk normal skin cells[40]. In addition, we distinguished the differences in ferroptosis-related gene expression in different cell types, especially in immune cell types (Additional file 1: Fig. S1B) and S.G&S.S cells (Fig. 1C). It is noteworthy that inconsistency between the transcriptome and protein levels at single-cell level must be taken into consideration [28].

Deng et al. identified that Streptococcus cysteine protease SpeB virulence factor can trigger keratinocyte pyroptosis by cleaving GSDMA [41]. Therefore, it is proposed that pyroptosis also participates in the process of autoimmune skin diseases. Results showed that psoriasis skin-derived keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells (ECs) had a lower pyroptosis geneset score than control skin cells, with the exception of macrophages (Additional file 1: Fig. S1D and Fig. 1D). GSDMA and GSDMC were highly expressed in S.C cells, whereas GSDMB was highly expressed in S.B cells (Fig. 1E). Interestingly, compared with psoriasis skin-derived S.C cells, control skin cells highly expressed pyroptosis-related genes (CASP4, GSDMA, and GSDMC), suggesting that psoriasis skin-derived S.C cells were not sensitive to pyroptosis. In contrast, psoriasis skin-derived S.B cells expressed high levels of pyroptosis-related genes, such as CASP1, CAPS8, GSDMA, GSDMB, and GSDMD. Further, CASP3 was downregulated in S.C and S.G&S.S cells of psoriatic skin. Together, these data show that pyroptosis participates in the imbalance between the sensitivity of pyroptosis and apoptosis in different keratinocyte lineages (Fig. 1F). However, this biological phenotype requires further validation in future studies.

GSDMC and GSDMD disrupted the keratinocyte differentiation of AD

AD, a common inflammatory skin disease, is primarily characterized by a type-II immune response that leads to skin barrier damage [42]. To investigate potential cell death modalities, AD-related scRNA-seq datasets obtained from GSE147424 was analyzed. No major differences were observed in the ferroptosis suppressor gene score, ferroptosis driver gene score, and pyroptosis gene score in the fibroblast population, keratinocyte population, and EC population from healthy skin biopsy, lesional skin biopsy, and non-lesional biopsy (Additional file 2: Fig. S2A). However, GSDMC and GSDMD were highly expressed in lesional skin-derived keratinocytes (Fig. 2A). It is noteworthy that nuclear programmed death ligand 1 (nPD-L1) can upregulate GSDMC, whereas TNF-α-activated caspase-8 can cleave GSDMC, which will switch apoptosis to pyroptosis in cancer cells [43]. TNF-α has been shown to play a role in the pathogenesis of allergic inflammation in AD [44]. This evidence demonstrated that TNFα-Caspase8-GSDMC mediated pyroptosis may trigger keratinocyte death and inflammation. Keratinocytes were segregated into nine subtypes (Additional file 2: Fig. S2B, C). In addition, based on the expression patterns of GSDMC and GSDMD, keratinocytes were divided into three subpopulations: GSDMChiGSDMDlow, GSDMChiGSDMDhi, and GSDMClowGSDMDhi (Fig. 2B). Further analysis revealed that lesional skin-derived keratinocytes were located in the GSDMChiGSDMDhi subset (Fig. 2C). Accordingly, it is speculated that this unique transition of the pyroptosis-sensitive keratinocyte subpopulation may play a role in pyroptosisin AD.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Novel pyroptosis-sensitive keratinocyte subsets in lesion AD. (A) Dot plot displays GSDMC and GSDMD mRNA expression in keratinocytes derived from AD lesional samples, AD non-lesional samples, and healthy samples. (B) Feature plots present expression of GSDMC and GSDMD in keratinocytes. (C) Feature plots display expression of GSDMC and GSDMD in keratinocytes during the disease. (D) Schematic depiction of the transition between normal keratinocytes and pyroptosis-sensitive keratinocytes

Full size image

The pyroptosis and ferroptosis of epidermal melanocytes might drive vitiligo

Vitiligo is caused by the loss of epidermal melanocytes due to the activity of autoreactive CD8+ T cells. To clarify the potential mechanism leading to the loss of epidermal melanocytes, we analyzed scRNA-seq datasets of skin-derived cells from healthy donors and patients with vitiligo (Additional file 3: Fig. S3A). The melanocytes were defined as signature genes (DCT, TYRP1, PMEL, and MLANA) (Additional file 3: Fig. S3B). Further analysis of melanocytes revealed strong pyroptosis responses existed in patients with vitiligo (Fig. 3A).Results demonstrated that CASP1, CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, and GSDMD expression was significantly upregulated in melanocytes of patients with vitiligo (Fig. 3B). As previously reported, CASP4, CASP8, and CASP1 are involved in GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis [45,46,47]. Caspase-6 promotes Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1)-mediated apoptosis, necroptosis and pyroptosis [48]. These results indicate that pyroptosis signaling is an important pathway in the development of vitiligo.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pyroptosis and ferroptosis drive the melanocyte destruction. (A) Box plot showing pyroptosis geneset score of melanocytes within skin of patients with vitiligo and healthy donor skin. (B) Dot plot showing the expression levels of CASP1, CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, GSDMD, GSDMA, GSDMB, and GSDMC within melanocytes derived from vitiligo groups and control groups. (C) Quantification of ferroptosis suppressor geneset score within melanocytes derived from vitiligo groups and control groups. (D) Dot plot showing the expression levels of ferroptosis-resistant genes (GPX4, NR4A1, FTH1, FTL, MT1G, NFE2L2, and SLC40A1) within melanocytes. (E) Schematic depiction of cell fate of melanocytes under pathological condition

Full size image

A ferroptosis-related analysis of melanocytes was conducted, in which only a small number of samples (1/10) showed a higher ferroptosis driver gene score than that of healthy donors (Additional file 3: Fig. S3C). Nevertheless, several important ferroptosis driver genes, such as ASCL4 and TFRC, were upregulated in the patient samples (Additional file 3: Fig. S3D). Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4), a critical component of ferroptosis, is enriched in cellular membranes with long polyunsaturated ω6 fatty acids and increases the sensitivity of target cells to ferroptosis [49]. TFRC overexpression increases the intracellular iron pool and enhances lipid peroxidation. Notably, we found that melanocytes of patients (7/10) had a lower ferroptosis suppressor gene score than that of healthy donors, indicating that these melanocytes were sensitive to ferroptosis (Fig. 3C). Healthy donor-derived melanocytes stably expressed key anti-ferroptosis genes at high levels, such as GPX4, NR4A1, FTH1, FTL, MT1G, and SLC40A1 (Fig. 4D). Our results confirmed that both pyroptosis and ferroptosis are involved in the loss of melanocytes during vitiligo development.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Ferroptosis-sensitivity was increased with decreasing expression of ferroptosis-resistant genes in brain cells of patients with MS. (A) Violin plot showing the ferroptosis suppressor geneset score in the different brain-derived cell subsets. (B) Dot plot showing the expression levels of GPX4, FTH1, MT1G, CISD, ISCU, PARK7, TF, and MTF1 within neurons of MS groups and control groups. Dot plot showing the expression levels of ferroptosis-resistant genes within oligodendrocytes (C), astrocytes (D), OPCs (E), and EC/VSM (F) derived from MS groups and control groups. (G) Schematic depiction of ferroptosis-sensitive state under MS pathological condition

Full size image

The IFN-γ signaling pathway is activated in melanocytes of patients with vitiligo [50]. Therefore, B16 cell line was used as a cell model to explore the effects of IFN-γ signaling-mediated ferroptosis and pyroptosis (Fig. 3F). IFN-γ-mediated pyroptosis depends on the IFN-γ concentration (Fig. 3G). In general, IFN-γ induces pyroptosis susceptibility based on upregulation of GSDMD, GSDME, CASP1, and CASP8. Interestingly, IFN-γ exposure did not significantly reduce the expression of GPX4, SLC7A11, or SLC3A2, implying that other factors are involved in the increasing ferroptosis-sensitive state of melanocytes in patients with vitiligo. Taken together, IFN-γ is a critical factor that drives the pyroptosis-sensitive state, but not ferroptosis.

Ferroptosis participated in the pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS)

To investigate further the involvement of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in the pathology of autoimmune diseases, we compared the single-nucleus transcriptional profile of brain cells derived from MS patients and control individuals [51]. Although the two groups didn not show obvious differences in ferroptosis driver/suppressor gene scores and pyroptosis gene score (Additional file 4: Fig. S4), neurons had a lower ferroptosis suppressor gene score than other cell types (oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, immune cells, EC/VSM, and OPCs) (Fig. 4A). In addition, the neurons of MS patients expressed some important anti-ferroptosis genes (such as GPX4, FTH1, MT1G, and MTF1) at low levels (Fig. 4B). The same phenomenon was observed in some cell types, such as oligodendrocytes (GPX4, NFE2L2, FTH1, MT1G, SLC16A1, MTF1 etc.) (Fig. 4C), astrocytes (GPX4, NFE2L2, FTH1, MT1G, SLC40A1, MTF1 etc.) (Fig. 4D), OPCs (GPX4, SQSTM1, and FTH1) (Fig. 4E), and EC/VSM (GPX4, FTH1, MT1G, SQSTM1, SLC40A1, SLC16A1, and MTF1) (Fig. 4F). It has been observed that GPX4, as the most robust anti-ferrotposis functional gene, was commonly downregulated in MS patient-derived cell types, which convincingly demonstrated that ferroptosis is involved in the progression of MS. The downregulation of ferroptosis-resistant genes in MS brain cells leads to a tendency towards ferroptosis.

Pyroptosis and ferroptosis were involved in the systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disorder that can lead to interstitial lung disease (ILD). To explore the role of pyroptosis and ferroptosis in SSc-ILD, we analyzed the scRNA-seq dataset from GSE128169, which included eight SSc-ILD samples and five control samples. Analysis of pyroptosis-related driver genes in several major cell types revealed many significant changes between normal lungs and SSc-ILD samples. CASP1, CASP6, CASP8, GSDMB, GSDMC, and GSDMA were markedly upregulated in alveolar type 1&2 cells derived from SSc-ILD samples (Fig. 5A). Notably, group A Streptococcus (GAS) cysteine protease SpeB virulence factor can cleave GSDMA after Gln246, which triggers pyroptosis [41]. Upregulated GSDMA levels in patient with SSc may lead to pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pyogenes or other toxins. In addition, the club/gobelet/basal cells tended to upregulate the expression of CASP8, CASP1, GSDMB, and GSDMC in the SSc-ILD samples (Fig. 5B). Smooth muscle cells and pericytes in SSc-ILD lungs showed increased expression of GSDMD, DHX9, CASP4, CASP1, CASP6, and CASP8 compared to healthy cells (Fig. 5C). SSc-ILD lung-derived ECs exhibited high expression of DHX9, GSDMB, and GSDMC (Fig. 5D). Thus, increased GSDMB expression in alveolar type 1&2 cells, club/gobelet/basal cells, and ECs derived from SSc-ILD might increase the risk of pyroptosis mediated by the GZMA of autoactive CTLs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Pyroptosis involved in the pathological process of SSc-ILD. Expression levels of pyroptosis-related genes in different cell types, such as alveolar type 1&2 cells (A), club/gobelet/basal cells (B), smooth muscles/pericytes (C), and ECs (D) across matched samples. (E) Selected important genes are shown in monocle2 produced pseudotime trajectory plot in different representative samples. (F) Schematic depiction of typical GSDM gene expression patterns within different cell types under pathological SSc-ILD condition

Full size image

To evaluate the role of ferroptosis in SSc-ILD, the ferroptosis suppressor/driver gene set score was identified and found no significant difference between healthy lungs and SSc-ILD lungs in several cell types (fibrobasts, alveolar type 1&2 cells, smooth muscle/pericytes, club/gobelet/basal cells, and ECs) (Additional file 5: Fig. S5A). Several studies have shown that fibroblasts play a key role in fibrotic ILD owing to abnormalities in aberrant extracellular matrix remodeling [52]. Accordingly, we analyzed the cell trajectory of fibroblasts, and identified two different branches with various effector gene expression patterns. Branch 1 expressed IL6 at high level, and branch 2 highly expressed profibrotic features, such as CXCL12 [53], VEGFA [54], IGF1 [55], and TGFB1 [56] (Additional file 5: Fig. S5B). This profibrotic branch mostly exists in SSc-ILD lungs, but not in healthy lungs, and expresses ferroptosis-related genes (ferroptosis-resistant genes: GPX4 and NR4A1 [57]; pro-ferroptotic genes: NCOA4 and SAT1 [58]); and pyroptosis drivers (CASP4 and GSDMD) (Fig. 5E). These results revealed that SSc-ILD profibrotic fibroblasts had high activity of ferroptosis and pyroptosis. Interestingly, SSc-ILD mast cells substantially expressed CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, DHX9, and GSDMD (Additional file 5: Fig. S5C), suggesting relationship between pyroptosis and mast cell degranulation.

Ferroptosis was involved in the imbalance of intestinal microenvironment homeostasis in Crohn’s Disease

Crohn’s disease (CD), a common form of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is characterized by irreversible aberrant immune responses [59]. Public scRNA-seq dataset of the terminal ileum of patients with CD and control donors was obtained from https://www.gutcellatlas.org/ (Additional file 6: Fig. S6A). First, we investigated the ferroptosis state of fibroblasts (Additional file 6: Fig. S6B), and confirmed that some proferroptosis genes, such as ACSL4, RPL8, SAT1, and CS [60], were upregulated (Fig. 6A). In addition, CD fibroblasts highly expressed some ferroptosis-resistant genes (such as FTH1, GPX4, NR4A1, NFE2L2, and FTL), but not others (such as MT1G and SLC40A1), indicating that pathological changes in fibroblast heterogeneity existed to some extent (Additional file 6: Fig. S6C). Consequently, the analysis of the cell trajectory of fibroblasts (Additional file 6: Fig. S6D) and revealed a unique differentiated cell state with ASCL4, CTSB, SAT1, and NFE2L2 expression at high levels (Fig. 6B). This differentiated cell state was consistent with SSc-ILD profibrotic fibroblast branch 2. Interestingly, this branch expressed SLC40A1 at low levels. These results highlighted that ferrotposis affected the balance of fibroblast differentiation. However there were no obvious differences in the pyroptosis-related genes between CD patient-derived fibroblasts and normal cells (Additional file 6: Fig. S6E, F).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Aberrant ferroptosis and pyroptosis involved in the pathological process of CD. (A) Dot plot showing the expression levels of pro-ferroptosis genes within fibroblasts of CD samples and control samples. (B) Selected representative genes are shown in monocle2 produced pseudotime trajectory plots of fibroblasts under different conditions. Violin plots showing the expression levels of ferroptosis suppressor genes (C), ferroptosis driver genes (D), and pyroptosis-related genes (E) within epithelial cells of CD samples and control samples. (F) The expression levels of NCOA4, GPX4, NFE2L2, FTH1, FTL, P4HB, PRDX1, and SLC40A1 within myeloid cells of CD samples and control samples. (G, H) Selected important genes were shown in monocle2 produced pseudotime trajectory plot under different conditions. (I) i. The schematic of bulk RNA-seq of THP-1-derived cells. ii. Heatmap depicted gene expression levels of macrophage-related genes (M1: IL18, IL1B, and TNF; M2: IL10 and TGFB1). iii. Heatmap of expression levels of pyroptosis-related genes. iv. Heatmap shows expression levels of ferroptosis-related genes

Full size image

The expression of multiple ferroptosis suppressors and driver genes in the epithelial cells (Fig. 6C, D) showed that epithelial cells derived from patients with CD expressed anti-ferroptosis genes (ZFP36 [61], HSPA5 [62], AKR1C3 [63], PLIN2 [64], FTL, FTH1, GPX4, and MT1G [65]) at lower levels than those of control cells, while pro-ferroptosis gene levels (RPL8 and MTDH [66]) were higher than those control cells. However, no clear evidence of upregulating pyroptosis drivers was identified (Additional file 6: Fig. S6G and Fig. 6E).

Next, it was necessary to investigatewhether pyroptosis and ferroptosis are involved in pathological myeloid differentiation. Myeloid cells in CD patients highly express anti-ferroptosis genes, such as GPX4, NFE2L2, FTH1, FTL, P4HB [67], and PRDX1 [68]. Moreover, compared to healthy myeloid cells, these myeloid cells expressed NCOA4 at low levels. Interestingly, SLC40A1 was highly expressed in healthy donor-derived myeloid cells (Fig. 6F). Cell trajectory analysis showed that macrophage M1 and M2 polarizations both existed in myeloid cells (Fig. 6G and Additional file 6: Fig. S6J). In addition, myeloid cells of patients with CD trended to polarize into the ferroptosis-resistant M1 state (Fig. 6H). SLC40A1 may also play a critical role in the maintaining of M2 state. SLC40A1 is highly expressed in tumor-associated macrophages, which suppresses the production of IL-1β [69], and is consistent with low IL-1β expression in control myeloid cells.

To identify the ferroptosis/pyroptosis patterns of macrophages under inflammatory conditions, as described CD inflammatory microenvironment, PMA, IFN-γ, and LPS were added to induce the differentiation of active macrophages and M1 macrophages (Fig. 6I(i)). Upon the PMA stimulation, THP-1 cells were induced into an activated state by secreting both M1 cytokines (IL18, IL1B, and TNF) and M2 cytokines (IL10 and TGFB1) (Fig. 6I(ii)). The cells were then differentiated into strong M1 states under IFN-γ and/or LPS culture conditions. Interestingly, with terminal M1 differentiation, THP-1-derived cells were more susceptible to pyroptosis owing to the upregulated expression of GSDMD, CASP4, CASP9, GSDMA, CASP5, GSDMC, and CASP8, but not GSDMB (Fig. 6I(iii)). The ferroptosis-related gene expression patterns of THP-1-derived M1-like cells were consistent with those of the above patterns of CD-related macrophages at scRNA-seq levels, such as SLC40A1 (Fig. 6I(iv)). THP-1-derived M1-like cells showed increased anti-ferroptotic activity (GPX4, NR4A1, FTH1, MT1G, SLC7A11, SLC3A2, and FTL) and decreased expression of NCOA4 and ALOXE3. Together, these results suggest that inflammatory conditions could drive the reversal of the sensitivity to ferroptosis and pyroptosis, and these properties could be targeted for treatment.

The prominent role of ferroptosis in experimental autoimmune orchitis

We elucidated the roles of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in six human autoimmune diseases. Next scRNA-seq dataset analysis of experimental autoimmune orchitis (EAO) (Additional file 7: Fig. S7A, B), which is a widely used as the mouse model of testicular inflammation [70], was conducted. Compared with other cell types, spermatids had a low ferroptosis suppressor gene expression score, which indicated that spermatids were sensitive to ferrotposis (Additional file 7: Fig. S7C). Except for spermatogonia/sertoli cell cluster, control sample-derived spermatids, spermatocytes, and Leyding cells/immune cells showed a high ferroptosis suppressor geneset score (Additional file 7: Fig. S7D). There was no significant difference in the ferroptosis driver gene score and pyroptosis gene score between EAO and control samples or different clusters (Additional file 7: Fig. S7E–H). In addition, GPX4 was downregulated in EAO cells (Additional file 7: Fig. S7I). Specifically, spermatids, Leydig cells/immune cells, spermatocytes, and spermatigonia/sortoli cells in EAO trended to have reduced Gpx4 expression (Additional file 7: Fig. S7J). These results confirmed that testicular cells were sensitive to ferroptosis under EAO conditions.

Discussion

The present study showed that in psoriasis, AD, vitiligo, MS, SSc-ILD, CD, and EAO, ferroptosis and pyroptosis act as disrupters with aberrant expression patterns. S.C cells of patients with psoriasis presented a cell death (ferroptosis/apoptosis/pyroptosis)-resistant pattern at the mRNA level. Meanwhile, S.G&S.S cells of patients with psoriasis possessed intensified resistance to apoptosis and pyroptosis, but were susceptible to ferroptosis. Our findings were consistent with those of a recent study [40], however, the roles of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in certain cell types of patients with psoriasis at the single cell level were highlighted in this work. Thus, our results provide valuable information to illustrate that some cell death-related drugs should be treated with great caution due to differences in cell death and changes in cell death sensitivity. Under AD pathological conditions, the keratinocyte lineage exhibits a unique and susceptible pyroptosis pattern. These keratinocytes tend to express both GSDMC and GSDMD, which might increase the sensitivity of pyroptosis. The high expression of GSDMC, suggests that inhibition of the TNFα-Caspase8 pathway may reduce the harmful effect of GSDMC-triggered pyroptosis [43]. Similarly, it may be helpful to reduce the risk of exposure to pathogens or other triggers of caspase-1 [71]. The pathogenesis of vitiligo is very clear [50, 72]. Epidermal melanocytes of patients with vitiligo have a remarkable features of pro-pyroptosis and pro-ferroptosis. A recent report has shown that ferroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of melanocyte destruction in vitiligo [73], which was consistent with our results, and confirmed the reliability of our analysis methods. Some researchers have made an assumption without direct evidence that pyroptosis is involved in the pathogenesis of melanocyte destruction [74]. However, our results provide tangible evidence of pyroptosis-driven melanocyte destruction. The upregulation of CASP1/4 and GSDMD may drive canonical and non-canonical GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis of melanocytes. These findings collectively indicate that ferroptosis and pyroptosis were the important inducement of autoimmune skin diseases. What’s more, intestinal epithelial cells are ferroptosis-sensitive.

Compared with the known pyroptosis-driven melanocyte destruction in patients with vitiligo, pyroptosis-driven brain cell destruction was weak in MS. However, a pyroptosis-sensitive trend was detected (Additional file 4: Fig. S4). Indeed, GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis is involved in neuroinflammation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model, which is initiated by peripheral myeloid cells [75]. Previous research has shown that GPX4 expression is decreased in the brains of patients with MS [76], which is consistent with our findings. Furthermore, this current study clarified which cell types were ferroptosis-sensitive at the single cell level, providing guidance on the selection of MS therapeutic strategies. Some researchers have noticed that pyroptosis may take part in the pathological alteration of pulmonary ECs in SSc [77]. Our results indicated that upregulation of GSDMB and GSDMC in SSc pulmonary ECs increased pyroptosis sensitivity. Different SSc pulmonary cell types upregulate different GSDM genes, such as GSDMA/B/C in AT1&2 cells, GSDMB/C in club/gobelet/basal cells, and GSDMD in smooth muscles/pericytes. Abnormal pyroptosis is linked to pathological transition of SSc-ILD and can be treated as a useful target. Macrophage-initiated pyroptosis is involved in the inflammatory response to CD. Pyroptosis-related features were not obvious in this work, while ferroptosis profoundly affected the balance of physiological and pathological fibroblasts, or M1 and M2 macrophages [78]. Thus, ferroptosis is involved in the pathological progression of EAO.

The ROS not only induece ferroptosis but also pyroptosis [79, 80], which points to the application of antioxidants in the treatment of some autoimmune diseases. Conventional antioxidant therapies have been proven to be less effective for several reasons, such as their inability to cross the blood–brain barrier, poor structural stability, low ROS and RNS scavenging activity, and low durability in vivo [81]. Nanomaterial antioxidants are good choice to solve these difficult problems, and several effective therapeutic nanomaterial antioxidants have been developed, such as two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD) nanosheets [81], triapazamine-loaded hollow mesoporous bilirubin nanoparticles (HMBRN) [82], Fe3O4 @ TAn nanoflowers [83], monodispersed hydrophilic carbohydrate-derived nanoparticles (C-NP) [84], Pt-iNOS@ZIF nanoreactors [85], and ceria nanoparticles [86,87,88]. A recent study reported that an orally administered antioxidant nanoplatform based on simulated gastric fluid (SGF)-stabilized titanium carbide MXene nanosheets (Ti3C2 NSs) could be used to treat inflammatory bowel disease [89]. Nanoparticles can also be modified to load dexamethasone and antioxidants, which integrate ROS scavenging and anti-inflammatory drug delivery [90]. Some nanomaterial antioxidants, such as nanoenzyme-reinforced injectable hydrogel [91] and CIP-loaded and ceria-decorated polymer vesicles (CIP-Ceria-PVs) [92], have wide application potential in skin-related diseases. Mitochondria also participates in apoptosis via lipid peroxidation [93]. Many mitochondria-targeted ROS scavengers, such as mitoquinone (MitoQ) [94], SkQ1 [95], and melatonin [96] can prevent mitochondrial ROS formation and inhibit ferropotosis. Our results provide a theoretical foundation for the use of antioxidants based on ferropotosis and pyroptosis in autoimmune diseases.

Many studies on non-apoptotic regulated cell death (RCD) in tumor immunotherapy, including autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, highlights the importance of research on non-apoptotic cell death mechanisms, and also indicate that these complex interactions can flow into several core molecular mechanisms [97]. Various microbial pathogen components and autoinflammatory factors also trigger these core molecular mechanisms, such as the CASP family/Granzyme-GSDM family axis and SLC7A11-GPX4 axis [98]. For example, Talaromyces marneffei can activate pyroptosis mediated by AIM2-caspase-1/-4-GSDMD in hepatocytes [99]. Moreover, some researchers have begun to pay attention to pyroptosis and ferroptosis in autoimmune diseases and drugs toxicity [100,101,102,103,104]. Our results provide pyroptosis/ferroptosis-associated signatures in several autoimmune diseases at the single-cell level, which provide extremely precise target information for the application of novel therapeutic approaches.

Taken together, the data presented herein strongly indicate that pyroptosis and ferroptosis are involved in autoimmune diseases (Table 2). scRNA-seq analysis was applied to understand the potential of programmed cell death in target cell types under pathological conditions. Our partial results were consistent with previous studies, demonstrating the reliability of the research methods adopted. In addition, the pattern and extent of ferroptosis and pyroptosis involvement in some autoimmune diseases determine the drugs that can be adopted to prevent uncontrolled cell death and inflammation. Notably, we found that IFN-γ is a key factor in increasing the sensitivity of pyroptosis, which provides a novel view for the role of IFN-γ-triggered pyroptosis in autoimmune diseases. Therapeutic strategies designed to inhibit the accumulation of ferroptosis/pyroptosis-sensitive target cells may improve clinical responses to autoimmune diseases. Thus, further studies based on in vivo experiments are required to screen for suitable drugs.

Table 2 Summary of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in autoimmune diseases
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this article. Other data that are relevant to this article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Yang J, Hu S, Bian Y, Yao J, Wang D, Liu X, Guo Z, Zhang S, Peng L. Targeting cell death pyroptosis, ferroptosis apoptosis and necroptosis in osteoarthritis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.789948.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasparakis M, Vandenabeele P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature. 2015;517(7534):311–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Risso V, Lafont E, Le Gallo M. Therapeutic approaches targeting CD95L/CD95 signaling in cancer and autoimmune diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(3):248.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Criddle DN, Gerasimenko JV, Baumgartner HK, Jaffar M, Voronina S, Sutton R, Petersen OH, Gerasimenko OV. Calcium signalling and pancreatic cell death: apoptosis or necrosis? Cell Death Differ. 2007;14(7):1285–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding Y, Chen X, Liu C, Ge W, Wang Q, Hao X, Wang M, Chen Y, Zhang Q. Identification of a small molecule as inducer of ferroptosis and apoptosis through ubiquitination of GPX4 in triple negative breast cancer cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tang R, Xu J, Zhang B, Liu J, Liang C, Hua J, Meng Q, Yu X, Shi S. Ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in anticancer immunity. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):110.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fang X, Wang H, Han D, Xie E, Yang X, Wei J, Gu S, Gao F, Zhu N, Yin X, Cheng Q, Zhang P, Dai W, Chen J, Yang F, Yang HT, Linkermann A, Gu W, Min J, Wang F. Ferroptosis as a target for protection against cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(7):2672–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarhan M, von Mässenhausen A, Hugo C, Oberbauer R, Linkermann A. Immunological consequences of kidney cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu S, Min J, Wang F. Ferroptosis: an emerging player in immune cells. Sci Bulletin. 2021;66(22):2257–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friedmann Angeli JP, Krysko DV, Conrad M. Ferroptosis at the crossroads of cancer-acquired drug resistance and immune evasion. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(7):405–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li J-y, Yao Y-m, Tian Y-p. Ferroptosis: a trigger of proinflammatory state progression to immunogenicity in necroinflammatory disease. Front Immunol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.701163.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mao H, Zhao Y, Li H, Lei L. Ferroptosis as an emerging target in inflammatory diseases. Prog Biophy Mol Biol. 2020;155:20–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu L, Chen D, Zhu Y, Pan T, Xia D, Cai T, Lin H, Lin J, Jin X, Wu F, Yu S, Zhu K, Xu L, Chen Y. GPX4-regulated ferroptosis mediates S100-induced experimental autoimmune hepatitis associated with the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:6551069–6551069.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng G, Li Y, Ma S, Gao Z, Zeng T, Chen L, Ye H, Yang M, Shi H, Yao X, Zeng Z, Chen Y, Song Y, Liu B, Gao L. Caveolin-1 dictates ferroptosis in the execution of acute immune-mediated hepatic damage by attenuating nitrogen stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;148:151–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li P, Jiang M, Li K, Li H, Zhou Y, Xiao X, Xu Y, Krishfield S, Lipsky PE, Tsokos GC, Zhang X. Glutathione peroxidase 4–regulated neutrophil ferroptosis induces systemic autoimmunity. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(9):1107–17.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergsbaken T, Fink SL, Cookson BT. Pyroptosis: host cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(2):99–109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma Y, Jiang J, Gao Y, Shi T, Zhu X, Zhang K, Lu K, Xue B. Research progress of the relationship between pyroptosis and disease. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(7):2213–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang X, Ma L, Zhang X, Huang L, Wei J. Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2022;11(1):11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan G, Huang C, Chen J, Zhi F. HMGB1 released from GSDME-mediated pyroptotic epithelial cells participates in the tumorigenesis of colitis-associated colorectal cancer through the ERK1/2 pathway. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):149.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Y-Y, Liu X-L, Zhao R. Induction of pyroptosis and its implications in cancer management. Front Oncol. 2019;9:971.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Newton K, Dixit VM, Kayagaki N. Dying cells fan the flames of inflammation. Science. 2021;374(6571):1076–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou Z, He H, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Su Y, Wang Y, Li D, Liu W, Zhang Y, Shen L, Han W, Shen L, Ding J, Shao F. Granzyme a from cytotoxic lymphocytes cleaves GSDMB to trigger pyroptosis in target cells. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz7548.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Neumann H, Medana IM, Bauer J, Lassmann H. Cytotoxic T lymphocytes in autoimmune and degenerative CNS diseases. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25(6):313–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Xia S, Kong Q, Li S, Liu X, Junqueira C, Meza-Sosa KF, Mok TMY, Ansara J, Sengupta S, Yao Y, Wu H, Lieberman J. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity. Nature. 2020;579(7799):415–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chao KL, Kulakova L, Herzberg O. Gene polymorphism linked to increased asthma and IBD risk alters gasdermin-B structure, a sulfatide and phosphoinositide binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(7):E1128–37.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Burdette BE, Esparza AN, Zhu H, Wang S. Gasdermin D in pyroptosis. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2021;11(9):2768–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo R, Lü M, Cao F, Wu G, Gao F, Pang H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Xing H, Liang C, Lyu T, Du C, Li Y, Guo R, Xie X, Li W, Liu D, Song Y, Jiang Z. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the acute myeloid leukemia microenvironment. Biomarker Res. 2021;9(1):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Li Y, Cao W, Wang F, Xie X, Li Y, Wang X, Guo R, Jiang Z, Guo R. Single-cell analysis of target antigens of CAR-T reveals a potential landscape of “on-target, off-tumor toxicity.” Front Immunol. 2021;12:799206.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lü M, Qiu L, Jia G, Guo R, Leng Q. Single-cell expression profiles of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 reveals potential vertical transmission and fetus infection of SARS-CoV-2. Aging (Albany NY). 2020;12(20):19880–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou N, Bao J. FerrDb: a manually curated resource for regulators and markers of ferroptosis and ferroptosis-disease associations. Database. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou X, Chen Y, Cui L, Shi Y, Guo C. Advances in the pathogenesis of psoriasis: from keratinocyte perspective. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(1):81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Q, Han X, Lan X, Gao Y, Wan J, Durham F, Cheng T, Yang J, Wang Z, Jiang C, Ying M, Koehler RC, Stockwell BR, Wang J. Inhibition of neuronal ferroptosis protects hemorrhagic brain. JCI Insight. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.90777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Z, Chen L, Chen C, Zhou Y, Hu D, Yang J, Chen Y, Zhuo W, Mao M, Zhang X, Xu L, Wang L, Zhou J. Targeting ferroptosis in breast cancer. Biomarker Res. 2020;8(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu S, Zhu C, Tang D, Dou QP, Shen J, Chen X. The role of ferroptosis in lung cancer. Biomarker Res. 2021;9(1):82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zuo S, Yu J, Pan H, Lu L. Novel insights on targeting ferroptosis in cancer therapy. Biomarker Res. 2020;8(1):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chen X, Yu C, Kang R, Tang D. Iron Metabolism in Ferroptosis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:590226.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim J, Lee J, Kim HJ, Kameyama N, Nazarian R, Der E, Cohen S, Guttman-Yassky E, Putterman C, Krueger JG. Single-cell transcriptomics applied to emigrating cells from psoriasis elucidate pathogenic versus regulatory immune cell subsets. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;148(5):1281–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kastelan M, Prpić-Massari L, Brajac I. Apoptosis in psoriasis. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2009;17(3):182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bebars SMM, Al-Sharaky DR, Gaber MA, Afify DR. Immunohistochemical expression of caspase-3 in psoriasis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25609.10145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Shou Y, Yang L, Yang Y, Xu J. Inhibition of keratinocyte ferroptosis suppresses psoriatic inflammation. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(11):1009.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng W, Bai Y, Deng F, Pan Y, Mei S, Zheng Z, Min R, Wu Z, Li W, Miao R, Zhang Z, Kupper TS, Lieberman J, Liu X. Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin B cleaves GSDMA and triggers pyroptosis. Nature. 2022;602(7897):496–502.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. He H, Suryawanshi H, Morozov P, Gay-Mimbrera J, Duca E, Kim H, Kameyama N, Estrada Y, Der E, Krueger J, Ruano J, Tuschl T, Guttman-Yassky E. Single-cell transcriptome analysis of human skin identifies novel fibroblast subpopulation and enrichment of immune subsets in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145:1615.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hou J, Zhao R, Xia W, Chang CW, You Y, Hsu JM, Nie L, Chen Y, Wang YC, Liu C, Wang WJ, Wu Y, Ke B, Hsu JL, Huang K, Ye Z, Yang Y, Xia X, Li Y, Li CW, Shao B, Tainer JA, Hung MC. PD-L1-mediated gasdermin C expression switches apoptosis to pyroptosis in cancer cells and facilitates tumour necrosis. Nat Cell Biol. 2020;22(10):1264–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ong PY. New insights in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Pediatric Research. 2014;75(1):171–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Fritsch M, Günther SD, Schwarzer R, Albert M-C, Schorn F, Werthenbach JP, Schiffmann LM, Stair N, Stocks H, Seeger JM, Lamkanfi M, Krönke M, Pasparakis M, Kashkar H. Caspase-8 is the molecular switch for apoptosis, necroptosis and pyroptosis. Nature. 2019;575(7784):683–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Muendlein HI, Jetton D, Connolly WM, Eidell KP, Magri Z, Smirnova I, Poltorak A. cFLIP<sub>L</sub> protects macrophages from LPS-induced pyroptosis via inhibition of complex II formation. Science. 2020;367(6484):1379–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, Shi X, Wang Y, Huang H, Zhuang Y, Cai T, Wang F, Shao F. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526(7575):660–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zheng M, Karki R, Vogel P, Kanneganti T-D. Caspase-6 is a key regulator of innate immunity, inflammasome activation, and host defense. Cell. 2020;181(3):674-687.e613.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Doll S, Proneth B, Tyurina YY, Panzilius E, Kobayashi S, Ingold I, Irmler M, Beckers J, Aichler M, Walch A, Prokisch H, Trümbach D, Mao G, Qu F, Bayir H, Füllekrug J, Scheel CH, Wurst W, Schick JA, Kagan VE, Angeli JP, Conrad M. ACSL4 dictates ferroptosis sensitivity by shaping cellular lipid composition. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13(1):91–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Xu Z, Chen D, Hu Y, Jiang K, Huang H, Du Y, Wu W, Wang J, Sui J, Wang W, Zhang L, Li S, Li C, Yang Y, Chang J, Chen T. Anatomically distinct fibroblast subsets determine skin autoimmune patterns. Nature. 2022;601(7891):118–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jäkel S, Agirre E, Mendanha Falcão A, van Bruggen D, Lee KW, Knuesel I, Malhotra D, Ffrench-Constant C, Williams A, Castelo-Branco G. Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2019;566(7745):543–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Valenzi E, Bulik M, Tabib T, Morse C, Sembrat J, Trejo Bittar H, Rojas M, Lafyatis R. Single-cell analysis reveals fibroblast heterogeneity and myofibroblasts in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(10):1379–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Griffiths K, Habiel DM, Jaffar J, Binder U, Darby WG, Hosking CG, Skerra A, Westall GP, Hogaboam CM, Foley M. Anti-fibrotic effects of CXCR4-targeting i-body ad-114 in preclinical models of pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3212.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Barratt SL, Blythe T, Ourradi K, Jarrett C, Welsh GI, Bates DO, Millar AB. Effects of hypoxia and hyperoxia on the differential expression of VEGF-A isoforms and receptors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Respir Res. 2018;19(1):9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wynes MW, Frankel SK, Riches DWH. IL-4-induced macrophage-derived IGF-I protects myofibroblasts from apoptosis following growth factor withdrawal. J Leukocyte Biol. 2004;76(5):1019–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chapman HA, Wei Y, Montas G, Leong D, Golden JA, Trinh BN, Wolters PJ, Le Saux CJ, Jones KD, Hills NK, Foster E, Oldham JM, Linderholm AL, Kotak P, Decaris M, Turner S, Song JW. Reversal of TGFβ1-Driven profibrotic state in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(11):1068–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ye Z, Zhuo Q, Hu Q, Xu X, Mengqi I, Zhang Z, Xu W, Liu W, Fan G, Qin Y, Yu X, Ji S. FBW7-NRA41-SCD1 axis synchronously regulates apoptosis and ferroptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. Redox Biol. 2021;38:101807.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mou Y, Wang J, Wu J, He D, Zhang C, Duan C, Li B. Ferroptosis, a new form of cell death: opportunities and challenges in cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Elmentaite R, Ross ADB, Roberts K, James KR, Ortmann D, Gomes T, Nayak K, Tuck L, Pritchard S, Bayraktar OA, Heuschkel R, Vallier L, Teichmann SA, Zilbauer M. Single-cell sequencing of developing human gut reveals transcriptional links to childhood crohn’s disease. Dev Cell. 2020;55(6):771-783.e775.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Dixon Scott J, Lemberg Kathryn M, Lamprecht Michael R, Skouta R, Zaitsev Eleina M, Gleason Caroline E, Patel Darpan N, Bauer Andras J, Cantley Alexandra M, Yang Wan S, Morrison B, Stockwell Brent R. Ferroptosis: an iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhang Z, Guo M, Li Y, Shen M, Kong D, Shao J, Ding H, Tan S, Chen A, Zhang F, Zheng S. RNA-binding protein ZFP36/TTP protects against ferroptosis by regulating autophagy signaling pathway in hepatic stellate cells. Autophagy. 2020;16(8):1482–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhu S, Zhang Q, Sun X, Zeh HJ 3rd, Lotze MT, Kang R, Tang D. HSPA5 regulates ferroptotic cell death in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2017;77(8):2064–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen X, Kang R, Kroemer G, Tang D. Broadening horizons: the role of ferroptosis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(5):280–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sun X, Yang S, Feng X, Zheng Y, Zhou J, Wang H, Zhang Y, Sun H, He C. The modification of ferroptosis and abnormal lipometabolism through overexpression and knockdown of potential prognostic biomarker perilipin2 in gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2020;23(2):241–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Sun X, Niu X, Chen R, He W, Chen D, Kang R, Tang D. Metallothionein-1G facilitates sorafenib resistance through inhibition of ferroptosis. Hepatology. 2016;64(2):488–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bi J, Yang S, Li L, Dai Q, Borcherding N, Wagner BA, Buettner GR, Spitz DR, Leslie KK, Zhang J, Meng X. Metadherin enhances vulnerability of cancer cells to ferroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(10):682.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen YC, Oses-Prieto JA, Pope LE, Burlingame AL, Dixon SJ, Renslo AR. Reactivity-based probe of the iron(II)-dependent interactome identifies new cellular modulators of ferroptosis. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(45):19085–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Luo P, Liu D, Zhang Q, Yang F, Wong Y-K, Xia F, Zhang J, Chen J, Tian Y, Yang C, Dai L, Shen H-M, Wang J. Celastrol induces ferroptosis in activated HSCs to ameliorate hepatic fibrosis via targeting peroxiredoxins and HO-1. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2021.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang Q, He Y, Luo N, Patel SJ, Han Y, Gao R, Modak M, Carotta S, Haslinger C, Kind D, Peet GW, Zhong G, Lu S, Zhu W, Mao Y, Xiao M, Bergmann M, Hu X, Kerkar SP, Vogt AB, Pflanz S, Liu K, Peng J, Ren X, Zhang Z. Landscape and dynamics of single immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2019;179(4):829-845.e820.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Li Y, Mi P, Wu J, Tang Y, Liu X, Cheng J, Huang Y, Qin W, Cheng CY, Sun F. High throughput scRNA-Seq provides insights into leydig cell senescence induced by experimental autoimmune orchitis: a prominent role of interstitial fibrosis and complement activation. Front Immunol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.771373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hou J, Hsu J-M, Hung M-C. Molecular mechanisms and functions of pyroptosis in inflammation and antitumor immunity. Molecular Cell. 2021;81(22):4579–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Gellatly KJ, Strassner JP, Essien K, Refat MA, Murphy RL, Coffin-Schmitt A, Pandya AG, Tovar-Garza A, Frisoli ML, Fan X, Ding X, Kim EE, Abbas Z, McDonel P, Garber M, Harris JE. scRNA-seq of human vitiligo reveals complex networks of subclinical immune activation and a role for CCR5 in Treg function. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13(610):8995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu X, Jin S, Yang Y, Lu X, Dai X, Xu Z, Zhang C, Xiang LF. Altered expression of ferroptosis markers and iron metabolism reveals a potential role of ferroptosis in vitiligo. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2022;35:328.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Chen J, Li S, Li C. Mechanisms of melanocyte death in vitiligo. Med Res Rev. 2021;41(2):1138–66.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Li S, Wu Y, Yang D, Wu C, Ma C, Liu X, Moynagh PN, Wang B, Hu G, Yang S. Gasdermin D in peripheral myeloid cells drives neuroinflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Expe Med. 2019;216(11):2562–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Hu C-L, Nydes M, Shanley KL, Morales Pantoja IE, Howard TA, Bizzozero OA. Reduced expression of the ferroptosis inhibitor glutathione peroxidase-4 in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Neurochem. 2019;148(3):426–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Matucci-Cerinic M, Hughes M, Taliani G, Kahaleh B. Similarities between COVID-19 and systemic sclerosis early vasculopathy: a “viral” challenge for future research in scleroderma. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20(10):102899–102899.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wang L, He T, Liu J, Tai J, Wang B, Chen Z, Quan Z. Pan-cancer analysis reveals tumor-associated macrophage communication in the tumor microenvironment. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2021;10(1):31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhang J-y. Zhou B, Sun R-y, Ai Y-l, Cheng K, Li F-n, Wang B-r, Liu F-j, Jiang Z-h, Wang W-j, Zhou D, Chen H-z, Wu Q: The metabolite α-KG induces GSDMC-dependent pyroptosis through death receptor 6-activated caspase-8. Cell Res. 2021;31(9):980–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang C, Song JW, Huang HH, Fan X, Huang L, Deng JN, Tu B, Wang K, Li J, Zhou MJ, Yang CX, Zhao QW, Yang T, Wang LF, Zhang JY, Xu RN, Jiao YM, Shi M, Shao F, Sékaly RP, Wang FS. NLRP3 inflammasome induces CD4+ T cell loss in chronically HIV-1-infected patients. J Clin Invest. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138861.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Yim D, Lee D-E, So Y, Choi C, Son W, Jang K, Yang C-S, Kim J-H. Sustainable nanosheet antioxidants for sepsis therapy via scavenging intracellular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. ACS Nano. 2020;14(8):10324–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Shan L, Fan W, Wang W, Tang W, Yang Z, Wang Z, Liu Y, Shen Z, Dai Y, Cheng S, Jacobson O, Zhai K, Hu J, Ma Y, Kiesewetter DO, Gao G, Chen X. Organosilica-based hollow mesoporous bilirubin nanoparticles for antioxidation-activated self-protection and tumor-specific deoxygenation-driven synergistic therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(8):8903–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Wei Z, Wang L, Tang C, Chen S, Wang Z, Wang Y, Bao J, Xie Y, Zhao W, Su B, Zhao C. Metal-phenolic networks nanoplatform to mimic antioxidant defense system for broad-spectrum radical eliminating and endotoxemia treatment. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(49):2002234.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Long Y, Wei H, Li J, Li M, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Cao T, Carlos C, German LG, Jiang D, Sun T, Engle JW, Lan X, Jiang Y, Cai W, Wang X. Prevention of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury by carbohydrate-derived nanoantioxidants. Nano Lett. 2020;20(9):6510–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mu J, Li C, Shi Y, Liu G, Zou J, Zhang D-Y, Jiang C, Wang X, He L, Huang P, Yin Y, Chen X. Protective effect of platinum nano-antioxidant and nitric oxide against hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2513.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Ni D, Wei H, Chen W, Bao Q, Rosenkrans ZT, Barnhart TE, Ferreira CA, Wang Y, Yao H, Sun T, Jiang D, Li S, Cao T, Liu Z, Engle JW, Hu P, Lan X, Cai W. Ceria nanoparticles meet hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: the perfect imperfection. Adv Mater. 2019;31(40):1902956.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Liu H, Han Y, Wang T, Zhang H, Xu Q, Yuan J, Li Z. Targeting microglia for therapy of parkinson’s disease by using biomimetic ultrasmall nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(52):21730–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Bailey ZS, Nilson E, Bates JA, Oyalowo A, Hockey KS, Sajja VSSS, Thorpe C, Rogers H, Dunn B, Frey AS, Billings MJ, Sholar CA, Hermundstad A, Kumar C, VandeVord PJ, Rzigalinski BA. Cerium oxide nanoparticles improve outcome after in vitro and in vivo mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;37(12):1452–62.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Hou L, Gong F, Liu B, Yang X, Chen L, Li G, Gong Y, Liang C, Yang N, Shen X, Liu Z, Cheng L. Orally administered titanium carbide nanosheets as anti-inflammatory therapy for colitis. Theranostics. 2022;12(8):3834–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhao C, Chen J, Ye J, Li Z, Su L, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen J, Yang H, Shi J, Song J. Structural transformative antioxidants for dual-responsive anti-inflammatory delivery and photoacoustic inflammation imaging. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2021;60(26):14458–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Wang S, Zheng H, Zhou L, Cheng F, Liu Z, Zhang H, Wang L, Zhang Q. Nanoenzyme-reinforced injectable hydrogel for healing diabetic wounds infected with multidrug resistant bacteria. Nano Letters. 2020;20(7):5149–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wang T, Li Y, Cornel EJ, Li C, Du J. Combined antioxidant-antibiotic treatment for effectively healing infected diabetic wounds based on polymer vesicles. ACS Nano. 2021;15(5):9027–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Gao M, Yi J, Zhu J, Minikes AM, Monian P, Thompson CB, Jiang X. Role of mitochondria in ferroptosis. Mol Cell. 2019;73(2):354-363.e353.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Jelinek A, Heyder L, Daude M, Plessner M, Krippner S, Grosse R, Diederich WE, Culmsee C. Mitochondrial rescue prevents glutathione peroxidase-dependent ferroptosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2018;117:45–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Jiang Q, Yin J, Chen J, Ma X, Wu M, Liu G, Yao K, Tan B, Yin Y. Mitochondria-targeted antioxidants: a step towards disease treatment. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:8837893.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Sun X, Sun P, Zhen D, Xu X, Yang L, Fu D, Wei C, Niu X, Tian J, Li H. Melatonin alleviates doxorubicin-induced mitochondrial oxidative damage and ferroptosis in cardiomyocytes by regulating YAP expression. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2022;437:115902.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Gao W, Wang X, Zhou Y, Wang X, Yu Y. Autophagy, ferroptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis in tumor immunotherapy. Sig Transduc Target Ther. 2022;7(1):196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. LaRock DL, Johnson AF, Wilde S, Sands JS, Monteiro MP, LaRock CN. Group a streptococcus induces gsdma-dependent pyroptosis in keratinocytes. Nature. 2022;605(7910):527–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang G, Wei W, Jiang Z, Jiang J, Han J, Zhang H, Hu J, Zhang P, Li X, Chen T, He J, Li Z, Lai J, Liang H, Ning C, Ye L. Talaromyces marneffei activates the AIM2-caspase-1/-4-GSDMD axis to induce pyroptosis in hepatocytes. Virulence. 2022;13(1):963–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Fard JK, Hamzeiy H, Sattari M, Eftekhari A, Ahmadian E, Eghbal MA. Triazole rizatriptan induces liver toxicity through lysosomal/mitochondrial dysfunction. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2016;66(9):470–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Lai B, Wu C-H, Wu C-Y, Luo S-F, Lai J-H. Ferroptosis and Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol. 2022;13:2745.

    Google Scholar 

  102. You R, He X, Zeng Z, Zhan Y, Xiao Y, Xiao R. Pyroptosis and its role in autoimmune disease: a potential therapeutic target. Front Immunol. 2022;13:841732.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. You R, He X, Zeng Z, Zhan Y, Xiao Y, Xiao R. Pyroptosis and its role in autoimmune disease: a potential therapeutic target. Front Immunol. 2022;13:841732.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Liang F, Qin W, Zeng Y, Wang D. Modulation of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases by gasdermins. Front Immunol. 2022;13:841729.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance from the Translational Medical Center at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82100240, RQ. Guo; No. 82100219, DF. Zhang), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M692929, RQ. Guo), the Key scientific research projects of colleges and universities in Henan Province (22A320016, RQ. Guo), the Postdoctoral Research Start-up Funding of Henan Province (202001006, RQ. Guo), Joint Co-construction Project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Research Plan (LHGJ20200280, RQ. Guo; LHGJ20200332, DF. Zhang), Provincial and Ministry Joint Co-construction Project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Research Plan (SBGJ202103045, RQ. Guo), Postdoctoral Research Start-up Funding of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (RQ. Guo), Key Research and Development and Promotion Project of Henan province (212102310755, RQ. Guo).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Danfeng Zhang, Yadan Li and Chunyan Du have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Danfeng Zhang, Yadan Li, Lina Sang, Liu Liu, Yingmei Li, Fang Wang, Wenjuan Fan, Ping Tang, Dandan Chen, Xinsheng Xie, Zhongxing Jiang, Yongping Song & Rongqun Guo

  2. Academy of Medical Science, Henan Medical College of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Yadan Li & Rongqun Guo

  3. Laboratory Animal Center, School of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Yadan Li & Chunyan Du

  4. Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China

    Sidong Zhang & Xiaoyi Wang

  5. Department of Hematology, Zhengzhou People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China

    Yanmei Wang

Authors
  1. Danfeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yadan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chunyan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lina Sang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yingmei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenjuan Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ping Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sidong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dandan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yanmei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Xiaoyi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xinsheng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Zhongxing Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yongping Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Rongqun Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DFZ, YDL, CYD and RQG analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. XYW, LNS, LL, YML, FW, WJF, PT, SDZ, DDC, and YMW analyzed data. XSX, ZXJ, YPS and RQG initiated the study and organized, designed, and wrote the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xinsheng Xie, Zhongxing Jiang, Yongping Song or Rongqun Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

No individual data were used in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The expression patterns of ferroptosis and pyroptosis-related genes in different cell types derived from kin of psoriasis patients and healthy donor skin. (A) UMAP plot of cells derived from the skin of patients with psoriasis and healthy donors. (B) Quantification of ferroptosis driver geneset score and ferroptosis suppressor geneset score in different cell types (keratinocytes, fibroblasts, DCs, macrophages, and ECs) derived from the skin of patients with psoriasis and healthy donor. (C) Dot plot shows the expression levels of RPL8, NCOA4, and ALOXE3 in different keratinocyte subsets derived from psoriasis skin and healthy skin. (D) Quantification of pyroptosis geneset score in total cells and different subsets (fibroblasts, DCs, macrophages, and ECs) derived from the skin of patients with psoriasis and healthy donors.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

The expression patterns of ferroptosis and pyroptosis-related genes in different cell types of skin of patients with AD and healthy donor skin. (A) Quantification of ferroptosis suppressor geneset score and ferroptosis driver geneset score in different cell types (fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and ECs) under the disease condition. (B) Dot plot showing the expression of feature genes in different keratinocyte subsets. (C) UMAP plot of keratinocytes from skin of patients with AD and healthy donor skin.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

The state of ferroptosis driver in melanocytes. (A) UMAP plot of melanocytes from skin of patient with vitiligo and healthy skin. (B) Feature plot showing the expression level of DCT, TYRP1, PMEL, and MLANA. (C) Violin plots showing ferroptosis driver geneset score in different skin melanocytes. (D) Dot plot showing the expression level of ASCL4, NCOA4, LPCAT3, TF, and TFRC within melanocytes derived from vitiligo groups and control groups. (F) The schematic of qPCR of IFN-γ-treated B16 cells. (G) mGsdmd, Gsdme, Casp1, Casp8, Gpx4, Slc7a11, and Slc3a2 mRNA levels assessed by qPCR.

Additional file 4: Figure S4.

Quantification of ferroptosis suppressor geneset score, ferroptosis driver geneset score, and pyroptosis geneset score within different cell types of MS groups and control groups.

Additional file 5: Figure S5. (A

) The feature of ferroptosis within different cell types of patient samples and control samples. (B) Feature genes were shown in pseudotime trajectory plots. (C) Dot plot showing the expression levels of CASP1, CASP4, CASP6, CASP8, DHX9, GSDMD, GSDMB, GSDMC, and GSDMA within mast cells derived from patient samples and control samples.

Additional file 6: Figure S6.

(A) UMAP plot of intestinal cells from healthy children and patients with CD. (B) Heatmap showing the relative mean expression levels of ferroptosis-related genes across fibroblasts derived from healthy children and patients with CD. (C) Dot plot showing the expression levels of ferroptosis-related genes within fibroblasts. (D) Pseudotime trajectory plot of fibroblasts. (E) Heatmap showing the relative mean expression of pyroptosis-related genes within fibroblasts derived from CD samples and control samples. (F) Violin plot showing the expression level of GSDMB and GSDMD within fibroblasts of patients with CD and healthy donors. (G) Heatmap showing the relative mean expression of pyroptosis-related genes within epithelial cells. (H) Violin plot showing the expression level of TGFB1 and IL1B within myeloid cells derived from CD samples and healthy samples.

Additional file 7: Figure S7.

Decreasing GPX4 portended the ferroptosis involving EAO. (A) UMAP plot of testis cells from EAO models and control tissues. (B) Dot plot showing the feature genes of different major cell types. (C) Violin plot showing the quantification of ferroptosis suppressor geneset score and ferroptosis driver geneset score within testis cells. (D) Quantification of ferroptosis suppressor geneset score of different subsets under pathological or normal condition. (E) Quantification of ferroptosis driver geneset score within different cell types of EAO tissues and control tissues. (F) Box plot showing the quantification of pyroptosis geneset score in EAO tissues and control tissues. (G) Quantification of pyroptosis geneset score in different testis cell types. (H) Comparison of the quantification of pyroptosis geneset score in major cell types between EAO tissues and control tissues. (I) The expression level of Gpx4 in total testis cells derived from EAO samples or control samples. (J) Ridgeline plot showing Gpx4 expression level within different cell types of EAO samples or control samples.

Additional file 8: Table S1.

The human geneset of ferrotosis driver.

Additional file 9: Table S2.

The human geneset of ferrotosis suppressor.

Additional file 10: Table S3.

The mouse geneset of ferrotosis driver.

Additional file 11: Table S4.

The mouse geneset of ferrotosis suppressor.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Li, Y., Du, C. et al. Evidence of pyroptosis and ferroptosis extensively involved in autoimmune diseases at the single-cell transcriptome level. J Transl Med 20, 363 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03566-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03566-6

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us