Skip to main content
Download PDF

Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following infection: a 17-year population-based cohort study

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 21, Article number: 804 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Previous serological studies have indicated an association between viruses and atypical pathogens and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). This study aims to investigate the correlation between infections from common pathogens, including typical bacteria, and the subsequent risk of developing CFS. The analysis is based on data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database.

Methods

From 2000 to 2017, we included a total of 395,811 cases aged 20 years or older newly diagnosed with infection. The cases were matched 1:1 with controls using a propensity score and were followed up until diagnoses of CFS were made.

Results

The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate the relationship between infection and the subsequent risk of CFS. The incidence density rates among non-infection and infection population were 3.67 and 5.40 per 1000 person‐years, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.5, with a 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47–1.54). Patients infected with Varicella-zoster virus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Escherichia coli, Candida, Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus and influenza virus had a significantly higher risk of CFS than those without these pathogens (p < 0.05). Patients taking doxycycline, azithromycin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, or ciprofloxacin had a significantly lower risk of CFS than patients in the corresponding control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our population-based retrospective cohort study found that infection with common pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, is associated with an increased risk of developing CFS.

Introduction

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), also known as myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), is a mysterious disorder that affects 0.2%–3.48% of the global population, depending on the diagnostic criteria [1, 2]. The condition is characterized by disabling symptoms such as profound fatigue, post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, cognitive impairment, and orthostatic intolerance that last for at least 6 months, CFS leads to high medical costs but also decreased productivity, resulting in a high economic burden of $17–$24 billion US dollars annually [3,4,5]. The exact etiology of CFS remains unclear. However, diverse theories have been proposed, including sequelae of infectious diseases, dysregulation of the immune–inflammatory system, and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis dysfunction [3, 6].

Although the exact pathogenesis of CFS warrants additional research, the immune system is believed to play an important role. CFS is associated with elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-1) [7] and dysregulation of immune cells (decreased T-regulatory cells, persistence of autoantibody-generating autoreactive B cells, and reduced cytotoxicity of natural killer cells) [8, 9]. Triggering events—such as pathogen exposure, metal exposure, and environmental factors—initiate immune responses and generate oxidative stress that harms mitochondria [7,8,9,10]. The accumulation of stress through these triggering events elicits autoimmunity in genetically predisposed populations and eventually leads to clinical manifestation of diseases [10, 11]. Additionally, inflammation dysregulates the HPA axis [12], resulting in a vicious cycle in which hypocortisolism worsens control over the production of proinflammatory cytokines [8, 9]. Furthermore, circulating cytokines increase blood–brain barrier permeability, activate glial cells, and sensitize neurons to non-noxious stimuli [13]. These manifestations of neuroinflammation may explain the neurological symptoms of CFS, such as fatigue and pain.

Various pathogens have; including viruses and bacteria such as Borrelia burgdorferi, Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydia pneumonia, Mycoplasma, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, H. pylori, Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli have demonstrated the capacity to “trigger” CFS [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In fact, some patients have reported having a virus-like illness before the onset of CFS [22]. The association between CFS and viruses including Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), human herpesviruses 6–8, human parvovirus B19, enteroviruses, lentivirus, Ross River virus, and varicella–zoster virus (VZV) has been demonstrated to various degrees [23, 24].

Postinfectious fatigue has been observed in several diseases, such as COVID-19, dengue fever, and influenza [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Although the link between these pathogens and CFS has not been firmly established, given the hypothesis of the potential triggering role of pathogens in CFS, the association between CFS and many other common pathogens, such as bacteria and fungi, deserves more attention. Accordingly, our study is the first study comprehensively to investigate the relationship between infection with potential pathogens and CFS.

Immunomodulatory properties of some antibiotics—such as macrolides, tetracyclines, and quinolones—have been described and applied in trials to treat various diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), abdominal aneurysm, and cancer [31,32,33,34]. Our study also investigated the associations between immunomodulatory antibiotics and the risk of CFS for the further clinical implications.

Methods

Data source

The National Health Insurance (NHI) Program was launched in 1995 and currently covers more than 99% of the population in Taiwan. The National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) contains all original data from the NHI program and is updated annually by the National Health Research Institutes. The Longitudinal Generation Tracking Database 2005 (LGTD 2005). It is one of the most comprehensive nationwide population-based databases worldwide, containing a random sample of data for two million individuals recorded in the NHIRD [35,36,37]. The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM & ICD-10-CM) were used to ascertain diagnoses of diseases. Data analysis was performed at the Health and Welfare Data Center (HWDC), which was established by Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the China Medical University Hospital [CMUH109-REC2-031(CR-3)] and the Institutional Review Board of MacKay Memorial Hospital (16MMHIS074).

Study group

In our study, we obtained a cohort with infection and a control group from the longitudinal data set. Patients who received a diagnosis of potential pathogens (E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Borrelia burgdorferi, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Salmonella, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Orientia tsutsugamushi, Mycoplasma, Candida, Enterovirus, VZV, EBV, Influenza virus, Dengue virus) were defined as the cohort with infection. The index date was defined as the first date of diagnosis of a potential pathogen between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2017. Patients who did not receive a diagnosis of infection with a potential pathogen were defined as the cohort without infection (control group), and their index date was defined as a random date between 2000 and 2017. We excluded patients who had more than one potential pathogen, were aged < 20 years, or had history of pathogens preceding the index date. The potential pathogens examined included VZV (ICD-9-CM: 053; ICD-10-CM: B02), Epstein-Barr virus (ICD-9-CM: 075; ICD-10-CM: B27), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (ICD-9-CM: 010–018; ICD-10-CM: A15-A19), E. coli (ICD-9-CM: 041.4, 482.82, 008.0, 038.42; ICD-10-CM: J15.5, A04.0-A04.4, B96.2, A41.5), Candida (ICD-9-CM: 112; ICD-10-CM: B37), Enterovirus (ICD-9-CM: 008.67, 079.2, 047, 048; ICD-10-CM: B97.1, B34.1, A87.0, B08.4, B08.5), Salmonella (ICD-9-CM: 002, 003; ICD-10-CM: A01, A02), Staphylococcus aureus (ICD-9-CM: 482.41, 041.11, 038.11; ICD-10-CM: A49.02, A49.01, B95.62, B95.61, B95.8, A41.02, A41.01, J15.212, J15.211, J15.20, J15.21), Chlamydia pneumoniae (ICD-9-CM: 483.1; ICD-10-CM: J16.0, P23.1), Influenza virus (ICD-9-CM: 487, 488; ICD-10-CM: J09, J10, J11), Orientia tsutsugamushi (ICD-9-CM: 081.2; ICD-10-CM: A75.3), Mycoplasma (ICD-9-CM: 483.0, 041.81; ICD-10-CM: A49.3, B96.0, J15.7, J20.0), Dengue virus (ICD-9-CM: 061; ICD-10-CM: A90), and Borrelia burgdorferi (ICD-9-CM: 088.81; ICD-10-CM: A69.2).

Main outcome and confounding variables

The study defined CFS as ICD-9-CM 780.7 and ICD-10-CM G93.3, R53.8. The endpoint of the study was the clinical diagnosis of CFS during the observation period. Patients with CFS before the index date, cancer (ICD-9-CM: 140-208; ICD-10-CM: C00-C97), rheumatoid arthritis(RA) (ICD-9-CM: 714; ICD-10-CM: M06.9), sleep apnea (ICD-9-CM: 327.2, 780.51, 780.53, 780.57; ICD-10-CM: G47.3), narcolepsy (ICD-9-CM: 327.0, 327.1; ICD-10-CM: G47.4), bipolar affective disorders (ICD-9-CM: 296.4-296.8; ICD-10-CM: F31), schizophrenia (ICD-9-CM: 295; ICD-10-CM: F20), delusional disorders (ICD-9-CM: F297; ICD-10-CM: F22), anorexia and bulimia nervosa (ICD-9-CM: 307.1, 307.51; ICD-10-CM: F500, F501, F502), alcohol or other substance abuse (ICD-9-CM: 305; ICD-10-CM: F10, F11, F12, F13, F14, F15, F16, F17, F18, F19), Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (ICD-9-CM: 555.0-555.2, 555.9, 556; ICD-10-CM: K50-K51), burn (ICD-9-CM: 940-949; ICD-10-CM: T20-T32), HIV (ICD-9-CM: 042; ICD-10-CM: B20), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) (ICD-9-CM: 710.0; ICD-10-CM: M32) and multiple sclerosis (ICD-9-CM: 340; ICD-10-CM: G35) were excluded from the study. The study adjusted for pre-existing comorbidities including hypothyroidism (ICD-9-CM: 243, 244; ICD-10-CM: E02, E03, E89.0), diabetes mellitus (DM) (ICD-9-CM: 243, 244, E03; ICD-10-CM: E02, E03, E89.0), insomnia (ICD-9-CM: 307.42, 327.0, 780.52; ICD-10-CM: G470), depression (ICD-9-CM: 296.2, 296.3, 300.4, 311; ICD-10-CM: F320, F321, F322, F323, F324, F325, F341), anxiety (ICD-9-CM: 300; ICD-10-CM: F41), dementia (ICD-9-CM: 294.1, 294.2; ICD-10-CM: F01-F03), peptic ulcer (ICD-9-CM: 531, 532, 533; ICD-10-CM: K25, K26, K27), obesity (ICD-9-CM: 278; ICD-10-CM: E66), psoriasis (ICD-9-CM: 696; ICD-10-CM: L40), gout (ICD-9-CM: 274; ICD-10-CM: M10), dyslipidemia (ICD-9-CM: 2720, 2721, 2723, 2724; ICD-10-CM: E78.0, E78.1, E78.2, E78.3, E78.4, E78.5), Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (ICD-9-CM: 564.1; ICD-10-CM: K58), hepatitis B (ICD-9-CM: 070.2 ~ 070.3; ICD-10-CM: B16, B18.0, B18.1, B19.1), hepatitis C (ICD-9-CM: 070.41, 070.44, 070.51, 070.54,070.7; ICD-10-CM: B17.1, B18.2, B19.2), fibromyalgia (ICD-9-CM: 729.1; ICD-10-CM: M79.7) were also adjusted for in this study, as were antibiotic medications such as doxycycline. (ATC code: J01AA02), Azithromycin (ATC code: J01FA10), Clarithromycin (ATC code: J01FA09), Moxifloxacin (ATC code: J01MA14), Levofloxacin (ATC code: J01MA12) and Ciprofloxacin (ATC code: J01MA02).

Statistical analysis

The study conducted a data analysis through a retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into three age groups: less than 40, 40–64, and 65 years or older. The demographic data of the study participants are presented as numbers and percentages for categorical variables and as means and standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables. Differences between variables were determined using the independent Student’s t test or Pearson’s chi-square test, as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were employed to calculate the hazard ratio (HR), adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The multivariate analysis adjusted for the confounders of age, sex, comorbidities, and medications. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p value of less than 0.05 in all analyses. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), and all graphs were plotted using RStudio (version 3.5.2; RStudio Team, Boston, MA, USA).

Results

Table 1 displays the characteristics of the patients in both infection and control groups. After propensity score matching, there were 395,811 patients in the infection cohort and an equal number of participants in the control group. Figure 1 depicts the patient selection process. The cohort with infection and control group had equivalent proportions of women (58%) and men (42%), and the mean (standard deviation) age of patients in the infection cohort was 45.6 (17.48) years. The three most common baseline comorbidities in the infection cohort were peptic ulcer (20.2%), fibromyalgia (19.95%) and anxiety (14.6%). As indicated in Table 2, the cohort with infection had significantly higher risk of CFS than did the control group (aHR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.47–1.54). Those with VZV (aHR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.14), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (aHR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.34–1.57), E.coli (aHR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.05–1.3), Candida (aHR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.37–1.48), enterovirus (aHR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.29–2.67), Salmonella (aHR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.19–1.67), Staphylococcus aureus (aHR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.09–1.74) and influenza virus (aHR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.63–1.71) had significantly higher risk of CFS than did those without these pathogens (p < 0.05). The Kaplan–Meier survival curve presented in Fig. 2 illustrates the cumulative incidence of CFS in the two cohorts. Moreover, Fig. 3 provides a graphic representation of the different pathogens. Compared with female patients, male patients had a lower CFS risk. Additionally, patients aged 40–64 years and ≥ 65 years were 1.2 (95% CI 1.17–1.23) and 1.59 (95% CI 1.54–1.65) times more likely, respectively, to develop CFS compared with patients aged < 40 years. Several findings regarding comorbidities and medications emerged from Tables 3 and 4

  1. 1.

    Patients with diabetes mellitus (aHR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.01–1.09), insomnia (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.27–1.37), depression (aHR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.01–1.13), anxiety (aHR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.24–1.33), peptic ulcer (aHR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.18–1.25), gout (aHR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.11–1.21), dyslipidemia (aHR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.06–1.14), irritable bowel hepatitis C (aHR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.39–1.71), or fibromyalgia (aHR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.26–1.33) had a significantly higher risk of CFS than patients in the corresponding control group.

  2. 2.

    Patients with dementia (aHR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.42–0.98) and those taking doxycycline (aHR = 0.1, 95% CI 0.07–0.15), azithromycin (aHR = 0.07, 95% CI 0.05–0.1), moxifloxacin (aHR = 0.05, 95% CI 0.04–0.08), levofloxacin (aHR = 0.04, 95% CI 0.03–0.06), or ciprofloxacin (aHR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.31–0.83) had a significantly lower risk of CFS than patients in the corresponding control group.

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants after propensity score matching
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

the selection process of the participants

Full size image
Table 2 Cox model with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of Chronic fatigue syndrome associated with pathogens, sex and age
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Cumulative incidence of CFS compared between patients with and without pathogens using the Kaplan–Meier method

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Cumulative incidence of CFS compared between patients infected with different pathogens and without pathogens using the Kaplan–Meier method

Full size image
Table 3 Cox model with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of Chronic fatigue syndrome associated with comorbidities
Full size table
Table 4 Cox model with hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of Chronic fatigue syndrome associated with medications
Full size table

Table 5 reveals that irrespective of sex, age, comorbidities, and medications, patients with a potential pathogen had a higher risk of CFS than those without the potential pathogens.

Table 5 Incidence rates, hazard ratios and confidence intervals of patients with infection associated with risk factors
Full size table

Discussion

Our findings indicate that infections with various pathogens—bacteria, viruses, and fungi—were associated with an increased incidence of CFS (Table 2, Fig. 2). Only ICD codes for infections were included in our data; codes of colonization were excluded from our analysis. The hazard ratios of CFS were positively correlated with age; older adults were more likely to develop CFS after an episode of infection (Table 2). Moreover, infection increased the incidence of CFS in most of the comorbidity subgroups, but not in all of them (Table 5). However, the mechanisms behind the variation in incidence among different age groups and comorbidity subgroups were warranted for further investigations.

The study found that typical bacteria, including those that are intracellular (i.e., Salmonella), extracellular (i.e., E. coli) and with both properties (i.e., Staphylococcus aureus) were associated with an increased incidence of CFS. Only a few studies have addressed this topic. In 2007, Maes et al. found that serum immunoglobulin A and M against lipopolysaccharides of enterobacteria—such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis and Klebsiella pneumonia—were elevated in patients with CFS [38]. Typical bacteria have been indicated to influence the human immune system. For example, Staphylococcus is known for its immunomodulation ability, which is achieved by affecting T cells [39]. However, there was no other direct evidence studying the association of staphylococcal infection and CFS.

The study found that influenza with H1N1 influenza virus was associated with an increased incidence of CFS [40]. In our study, we also observed an association between influenza and CFS, but it was not limited to H1N1. Several studies have verified, mostly through serological approaches, that EBV infection increases the risk of developing CFS [41, 42]. However, in the present study, the associations of EBV and CMV with CFS were considered nonsignificant due to the limited number of identified cases. Similarly, significance could not be established for several other pathogens with limited cases, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma, dengue virus, Orientia tsutsugamushi, and Borrelia burgdorferi.

Studies involving multiple cohorts and cross-sectional studies have reported similarities between the symptoms of long COVID and CFS, such as cognitive impairment and fatigue over a follow-up duration ranging from 12 weeks to 6 months [43, 44]. Similar to CFS, long COVID presents with IL-6 dysregulation and disrupted T cell responses [45]. Moreover, elevated CD8+ T cells and increased type 1 cytokines were linked to abnormal chest X-ray findings in patients who had had COVID-19 six months after their discharge from the hospital [46]. Although the exact mechanisms of long COVID and CFS are not fully understood, these overlapping features warrant future research exploring both CFS and long COVID.

Candida albicans in fecal microflora was previously observed in patients with CFS [47]. Chronic Intestinal Candidiasis was indicated to be one of the possible factors of CFS and nutritional therapy for candidiasis, like an anti-candida diet and natural antifungals (i.e., caprylic acid), has shown to reduce symptoms of CFS [48, 49]. Scientists are increasingly recognizing the role of the gut–brain axis in patients with CFS. Multiple pathways have been proposed to explain gut–brain communication, such as the immune system (i.e., cytokines), hormones (i.e., gamma-aminobutyric acid), the neuron system (i.e., Vagus nerve), and metabolites (i.e., short-chain fatty acids) [50]. An altered gut microbiome composition is associated with not only CFS but a variety of diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus [51,52,53]. With regard to other fungi, mycotoxins detected in the urine of patients with CFS raised concern over the role of mycotoxin-producing mold, such as Aspergillus, in CFS [54]. Since research focusing on the association of CFS and fungi other than Candida is scarce, this topic deserves more attention.

Our finding indicated that the use of doxycycline, azithromycin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, or levofloxacin was significantly associated with decreased incidence of CFS (Tables 2 and 4). The exact mechanism underlying how these antibiotics prevent CFS is unknown, but they influence the immune system in different ways. Azithromycin inhibits transcription factors and their downstream inflammatory cytokines, such as the PI3K/AKT/NF-ҡB, ERK1/2/NF-ҡB, and AP-1 pathways [55, 56]. One study revealed that fluoroquinolones increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10 and decreased that of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α [31]. In addition to inhibiting TNF-α, doxycycline exerts immunomodulatory effects by downregulating proinflammatory enzymes, such as nitric oxide synthetase and matrix metalloproteinases [32, 33, 57]. A randomized controlled trial revealed that long-term doxycycline treatment offered no benefit in reducing fatigue in patients with Q Fever fatigue syndrome [58].

Our study, despite its limitations, provides significant insights into the association between CFS and infections. One limitation was the potential impact of rare pathogens on CFS due to the limited numbers of cases. However, our primary objective was to investigate the association between CFS and most seen pathogens, which we successfully demonstrated. Another limitation was our inability to conduct real-time evaluations of each infectious disease’s severity due to the unavailability of patients’ vital signs and laboratory data in the NHIRD. However, we accounted for comorbidities and adjusted for confounding factors to measure the risk of CFS-related factors.

Lastly, due to data anonymity, we couldn’t access information on renal or hepatic dose adjustments of antibiotics for each patient. Nevertheless, we presented most relevant pathogens that might cause CFS and considered comorbidities, which allowed us to adjust the hazard ratio accordingly.

Despite these limitations, our study has notable strengths. It includes a large number of cases and controls, making it the first one to demonstrate the association between CFS and most commonly seen pathogens using a big database. Our findings challenge previous beliefs that only atypical bacteria and viruses are associated with CFS by revealing that typical bacteria can also be linked to CFS. This supports the theory that pathogens play a “triggering” role in CFS.

In conclusion, our study indicates a higher risk of CFS following common infections, underscoring the triggering role of infection in CFS. Interestingly, we found that the incidence of CFS was lower when patients took antibiotics with immunomodulatory properties. This finding could shed light on potential treatment strategies for CFS.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the NHIRD. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available with the permission directly from the NHIRD.

References

  1. Steele L, Dobbins JG, Fukuda K, Reyes M, Randall B, Koppelman M, Reeves WC. The epidemiology of chronic fatigue in San Francisco. Am J Med. 1998;105:83s–90s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnston S, Brenu EW, Staines D, Marshall-Gradisnik S. The prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Epidemiol. 2013;5:105–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:953–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue S, Board on the Health of Select P, Institute of M: The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. In: Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: redefining an illness. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved; 2015

  5. Jason LA, Benton MC, Valentine L, Johnson A, Torres-Harding S. The economic impact of ME/CFS: individual and societal costs. Dyn Med. 2008;7:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tomas C, Newton J, Watson S. A review of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in chronic fatigue syndrome. ISRN Neurosci. 2013;2013: 784520.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang T, Yang Y, Wang D, Li C, Qu Y, Guo J, Shi T, Bo W, Sun Z, Asakawa T. The clinical value of cytokines in chronic fatigue syndrome. J Transl Med. 2019;17:213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bjørklund G, Dadar M, Pivina L, Doşa MD, Semenova Y, Maes M. Environmental, neuro-immune, and neuro-oxidative stress interactions in chronic fatigue syndrome. Mol Neurobiol. 2020;57:4598–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cortes Rivera M, Mastronardi C, Silva-Aldana CT, Arcos-Burgos M, Lidbury BA. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2019;9:91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blomberg J, Gottfries CG, Elfaitouri A, Rizwan M, Rosén A. Infection elicited autoimmunity and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an explanatory model. Front Immunol. 2018;9:229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wahren-Herlenius M, Dörner T. Immunopathogenic mechanisms of systemic autoimmune disease. Lancet. 2013;382:819–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsai S-Y, Lin C-L, Shih S-C, Hsu C-W, Leong K-H, Kuo C-F, Lio C-F, Chen Y-T, Hung Y-J, Shi L. Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following burn injuries. J Transl Med. 2018;16:342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsai S-Y, Chen H-J, Lio C-F, Kuo C-F, Kao A-C, Wang W-S, Yao W-C, Chen C, Yang T-Y. Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Transl Med. 2019;17:55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hickie I, Davenport T, Wakefield D, Vollmer-Conna U, Cameron B, Vernon SD, Reeves WC, Lloyd A. Post-infective and chronic fatigue syndromes precipitated by viral and non-viral pathogens: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2006;333:575.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Coyle PK, Krupp LB, Doscher C, Amin K. Borrelia burgdorferi reactivity in patients with severe persistent fatigue who are from a region in which Lyme disease is endemic. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(Suppl 1):S24-27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wildman MJ, Smith EG, Groves J, Beattie JM, Caul EO, Ayres JG. Chronic fatigue following infection by Coxiella burnetii (Q fever): ten-year follow-up of the 1989 UK outbreak cohort. QJM. 2002;95:527–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasralla M, Haier J, Nicolson GL. Multiple mycoplasmal infections detected in blood of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and/or fibromyalgia syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;18:859–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicolson G, Nasrala M, Gan R, Haier J, Meirleir K. Evidence for bacterial (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia) and viral (HHV-6) co-infections in chronic fatigue syndrome patients. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 2003;11:7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang TY, Lin CL, Yao WC, Lio CF, Chiang WP, Lin K, Kuo CF, Tsai SY. How mycobacterium tuberculosis infection could lead to the increasing risks of chronic fatigue syndrome and the potential immunological effects: a population-based retrospective cohort study. J Transl Med. 2022;20:99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo CF, Shi L, Lin CL, Yao WC, Chen HT, Lio CF, Wang YT, Su CH, Hsu NW, Tsai SY. How peptic ulcer disease could potentially lead to the lifelong, debilitating effects of chronic fatigue syndrome: an insight. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Donnachie E, Schneider A, Mehring M, Enck P. Incidence of irritable bowel syndrome and chronic fatigue following GI infection: a population-level study using routinely collected claims data. Gut. 2018;67:1078–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Naess H, Sundal E, Myhr KM, Nyland HI. Postinfectious and chronic fatigue syndromes: clinical experience from a tertiary-referral centre in Norway. In Vivo. 2010;24:185–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rasa S, Nora-Krukle Z, Henning N, Eliassen E, Shikova E, Harrer T, Scheibenbogen C, Murovska M, Prusty BK. Chronic viral infections in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). J Transl Med. 2018;16:268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsai SY, Yang TY, Chen HJ, Chen CS, Lin WM, Shen WC, Kuo CN, Kao CH. Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following herpes zoster: a population-based study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1653–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adeloye D, Elneima O, Daines L, Poinasamy K, Quint JK, Walker S, Brightling CE, Siddiqui S, Hurst JR, Chalmers JD, et al. The long-term sequelae of COVID-19: an international consensus on research priorities for patients with pre-existing and new-onset airways disease. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:1467–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Seet RC, Quek AM, Lim EC. Post-infectious fatigue syndrome in dengue infection. J Clin Virol. 2007;38:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vallings R. A case of chronic fatigue syndrome triggered by influenza H1N1 (swine influenza). J Clin Pathol. 2010;63:184–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Taquet M, Dercon Q, Luciano S, Geddes JR, Husain M, Harrison PJ. Incidence, co-occurrence, and evolution of long-COVID features: a 6-month retrospective cohort study of 273,618 survivors of COVID-19. PLoS Med. 2021;18: e1003773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Roessler M, Tesch F, Batram M, Jacob J, Loser F, Weidinger O, Wende D, Vivirito A, Toepfner N, Ehm F, et al. Post-COVID-19-associated morbidity in children, adolescents, and adults: a matched cohort study including more than 157,000 individuals with COVID-19 in Germany. PLoS Med. 2022;19: e1004122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Fung KW, Baye F, Baik SH, Zheng Z, McDonald CJ. Prevalence and characteristics of long COVID in elderly patients: an observational cohort study of over 2 million adults in the US. PLoS Med. 2023;20: e1004194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Assar S, Nosratabadi R, Khorramdel Azad H, Masoumi J, Mohamadi M, Hassanshahi G. A review of immunomodulatory effects of fluoroquinolones. Immunol Invest. 2021;50:1007–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Park CS, Kim SH, Lee CK. Immunotherapy of autoimmune diseases with nonantibiotic properties of tetracyclines. Immune Netw. 2020;20: e47.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindeman JH, Abdul-Hussien H, van Bockel JH, Wolterbeek R, Kleemann R. Clinical trial of doxycycline for matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibition in patients with an abdominal aneurysm: doxycycline selectively depletes aortic wall neutrophils and cytotoxic T cells. Circulation. 2009;119:2209–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang X, Wang X, Zhao YY, Curtis JM, Brindley DN. Doxycycline attenuates breast cancer related inflammation by decreasing plasma lysophosphatidate concentrations and inhibiting NF-κB activation. Mol Cancer. 2017;16:36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao WC, Leong KH, Chiu LT, Chou PY, Wu LC, Chou CY, Kuo CF, Tsai SY. The trends in the incidence and thrombosis-related comorbidities of antiphospholipid syndrome: a 14-year nationwide population-based study. Thromb J. 2022;20:50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Leong K-H, Yip H-T, Kuo C-F, Tsai S-Y. Treatments of chronic fatigue syndrome and its debilitating comorbidities: a 12-year population-based study. J Transl Med. 2022;20:268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen C, Yip H-T, Leong K-H, Yao W-C, Hung C-L, Su C-H, Kuo C-F, Tsai S-Y. Presence of depression and anxiety with distinct patterns of pharmacological treatments before the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome: a population-based study in Taiwan. J Transl Med. 2023;21:98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Leunis JC. Increased serum IgA and IgM against LPS of enterobacteria in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): indication for the involvement of gram-negative enterobacteria in the etiology of CFS and for the presence of an increased gut-intestinal permeability. J Affect Disord. 2007;99:237–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li Z, Peres AG, Damian AC, Madrenas J. Immunomodulation and disease tolerance to Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens. 2015;4:793–815.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Magnus P, Gunnes N, Tveito K, Bakken IJ, Ghaderi S, Stoltenberg C, Hornig M, Lipkin WI, Trogstad L, Håberg SE. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is associated with pandemic influenza infection, but not with an adjuvanted pandemic influenza vaccine. Vaccine. 2015;33:6173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Straus SE, Tosato G, Armstrong G, Lawley T, Preble OT, Henle W, Davey R, Pearson G, Epstein J, Brus I, et al. Persisting illness and fatigue in adults with evidence of Epstein-Barr virus infection. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:7–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shikova E, Reshkova V, Kumanova A, Raleva S, Alexandrova D, Capo N, Murovska M. Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus-6 infections in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. J Med Virol. 2020;92:3682–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J, Young M, Edison P. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. BMJ. 2021;374: n1648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ceban F, Ling S, Lui LMW, Lee Y, Gill H, Teopiz KM, Rodrigues NB, Subramaniapillai M, Di Vincenzo JD, Cao B, et al. Fatigue and cognitive impairment in Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:93–135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kappelmann N, Dantzer R, Khandaker GM. Interleukin-6 as potential mediator of long-term neuropsychiatric symptoms of COVID-19. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021;131: 105295.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shuwa HA, Shaw TN, Knight SB, Wemyss K, McClure FA, Pearmain L, Prise I, Jagger C, Morgan DJ, Khan S, et al. Alterations in T and B cell function persist in convalescent COVID-19 patients. Med (N Y). 2021;2:720-735.e724.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Evengård B, Gräns H, Wahlund E, Nord CE. Increased number of Candida albicans in the faecal microflora of chronic fatigue syndrome patients during the acute phase of illness. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1514–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cater RE 2nd. Chronic intestinal candidiasis as a possible etiological factor in the chronic fatigue syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 1995;44:507–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. White E, Sherlock C. The effect of nutritional therapy for yeast infection (Candidiasis) in cases of chronic fatigue syndrome. J Orthomol Med. 2005;20:193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  50. König RS, Albrich WC, Kahlert CR, Bahr LS, Löber U, Vernazza P, Scheibenbogen C, Forslund SK. The gut microbiome in myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Front Immunol. 2021;12: 628741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lupo GFD, Rocchetti G, Lucini L, Lorusso L, Manara E, Bertelli M, Puglisi E, Capelli E. Potential role of microbiome in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelits (CFS/ME). Sci Rep. 2021;11:7043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Clemente JC, Manasson J, Scher JU. The role of the gut microbiome in systemic inflammatory disease. BMJ. 2018;360: j5145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Tsai SY, Chen HJ, Chen C, Lio CF, Kuo CF, Leong KH, Wang YTT, Yang TY, You CH, Wang WS. Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following psoriasis: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Transl Med. 2019;17:154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Brewer JH, Thrasher JD, Straus DC, Madison RA, Hooper D. Detection of mycotoxins in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Toxins (Basel). 2013;5:605–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Parnham MJ, Erakovic Haber V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Perletti G, Verleden GM, Vos R. Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;143:225–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Khezri MR, Zolbanin NM, Ghasemnejad-Berenji M, Jafari R. Azithromycin: immunomodulatory and antiviral properties for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;905: 174191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Amin AR, Attur MG, Thakker GD, Patel PD, Vyas PR, Patel RN, Patel IR, Abramson SB. A novel mechanism of action of tetracyclines: effects on nitric oxide synthases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14014–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Keijmel SP, Delsing CE, Bleijenberg G, van der Meer JWM, Donders RT, Leclercq M, Kampschreur LM, van den Berg M, Sprong T, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, et al. Effectiveness of long-term doxycycline treatment and cognitive-behavioral therapy on fatigue severity in patients with Q fever fatigue syndrome (Qure Study): a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:998–1005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend acknowledgment to Dr. Chung Y. Hsu’s material support, and we are grateful to the listed institutes for funding support.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 112-2221-E-715-001), Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial Center (MOHW110-TDU-B-212-144004), Health Data Science Center, China Medical University Hospital (DMR-111-105; DMR-112-087), and by the Department of Medical Research at MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, Grant Numbers MMH-111-92, MMH-109-103, MMH-CT-11102, MMH-112-124, MMH-112-94, and MacKay Medical College, Grant Number 1082A03. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The APC was funded by the Department of Medical Research at MacKay Memorial Hospital and the co-first, Dr. Chien-Feng Kuo and the corresponding author, Dr. Shin-Yi Tsai.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hsun Chang, Chien-Feng Kuo and Teng-Shun Yu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Hsun Chang & Chien-Feng Kuo

  2. Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan

    Chien-Feng Kuo & Shin-Yi Tsai

  3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA

    Chien-Feng Kuo & Shin-Yi Tsai

  4. Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Teng-Shun Yu

  5. Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

    Teng-Shun Yu

  6. Medical Laboratory Science & Biotechnology, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

    Liang-Yin Ke

  7. Division of Cardiology, Departments of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

    Chung-Lieh Hung

  8. Institute of Biomedical Sciences, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Chung-Lieh Hung & Shin-Yi Tsai

  9. Department of Laboratory Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, 104, Taiwan

    Shin-Yi Tsai

  10. Institute of Long-Term Care, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan

    Shin-Yi Tsai

Authors
  1. Hsun Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chien-Feng Kuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teng-Shun Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liang-Yin Ke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chung-Lieh Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shin-Yi Tsai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S-YT. had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: S-YT. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: HC, T-SY, and S-YT, Drafting of the manuscript: All authors. Critical revision of the manuscript for important: S-YT. Intellectual content: S-YT; Statistical analysis: C-FK; Obtained funding: S-YT, C-FK; Administrative, technical, or material supports: T-SY; S-YT, and C-FK. Study supervision: S-YT. Submission: HC and S-YT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-Yi Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the China Medical University Hospital and the Institutional Review Board of MacKay Memorial Hospital.

Consent for publication

The authors agree with the publication of this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, H., Kuo, CF., Yu, TS. et al. Increased risk of chronic fatigue syndrome following infection: a 17-year population-based cohort study. J Transl Med 21, 804 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04636-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04636-z

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us