Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effects of preoperative high-oral protein loading on short- and long-term renal outcomes following cardiac surgery: a cohort study

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 20, Article number: 204 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Post-cardiac surgery acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with increased mortality. A high-protein meal enhances the renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and might protect the kidneys from acute ischemic insults. Hence, we assessed the effect of a preoperative high-oral protein load on post-cardiac surgery renal function and used experimental models to elucidate mechanisms by which protein might stimulate kidney-protective effects.

Methods

The prospective “Preoperative Renal Functional Reserve Predicts Risk of AKI after Cardiac Operation” study follow-up was extended to postoperative 12 months for 109 patients. A 1:2 ratio propensity score matching method was used to identify a control group (n = 214) to comparatively evaluate the effects of a preoperative protein load and standard care. The primary endpoints were AKI development and postoperative estimated GFR (eGFR) loss at 3 and 12 months. We also assessed the secretion of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor–binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), biomarkers implicated in mediating kidney-protective mechanisms in human kidney tubular cells that we exposed to varying protein concentrations.

Results

The AKI rate did not differ between the protein loading and control groups (13.6 vs. 12.3%; p = 0.5). However, the mean eGFR loss was lower in the former after 3 months (0.1 [95% CI − 1.4, − 1.7] vs. − 3.3 [95% CI − 4.4, − 2.2] ml/min/1.73 m2) and 12 months (− 2.7 [95% CI − 4.2, − 1.2] vs − 10.2 [95% CI − 11.3, − 9.1] ml/min/1.73 m2; p < 0.001 for both). On stratification based on AKI development, the eGFR loss after 12 months was also found to be lower in the former (− 8.0 [95% CI − 14.1, − 1.9] vs. − 18.6 [95% CI − 23.3, − 14.0] ml/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.008). A dose–response analysis of the protein treatment of the primary human proximal and distal tubule epithelial cells in culture showed significantly increased IGFBP7 and TIMP-2 expression.

Conclusions

A preoperative high-oral protein load did not reduce AKI development but was associated with greater renal function preservation in patients with and without AKI at 12 months post-cardiac surgery. The potential mechanisms of action by which protein loading may induce a kidney-protective response might include cell cycle inhibition of renal tubular epithelial cells.

Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03102541 (retrospectively registered on April 5, 2017) and ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03092947 (retrospectively registered on March 28, 2017).

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common major complication of cardiac surgery and independently associated with increased short- and long-term morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. Although many patients show AKI reversal within days to weeks of development, data suggest a strong association between AKI and subsequent chronic kidney disease (CKD) [3, 4]. Hence, effective approaches to prevent the development of AKI are vital for reducing the burden of CKD. The pathophysiology of AKI after cardiac surgery is likely characterized by the involvement of multiple injury pathways to varying degrees in patients preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively [5]. Among the proposed mechanisms, alterations in renal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative renal ischemic injury are thought to be important contributors to AKI [6].

In healthy humans and adults scheduled to undergo cardiac surgery, a high protein load reportedly enhances the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) through a global increase in renal blood flow due to afferent arteriolar dilation and a decrease in renal vascular resistance resulting in glomerular hyperfiltration [7]. This presumably happens via the modulation of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism and changes in the levels of vasoactive compounds [8, 9]. In contrast, protein restriction is associated with a reduction in renal blood flow and GFR [10]. Animal models has shown that amino acids can protect the kidneys from acute ischemic insults, likely by maintaining the renal blood flow and thus ameliorating ischemic and inflammatory injuries that could contribute to AKI [11].

However, interventions that increase the renal blood flow (e.g., dopamine application) have been uniformly ineffective in preventing or treating AKI. A possible reason is that the protein load may stress the kidneys in the same way that direct or remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may [12, 13]. This sub-injurious “stress” may trigger protective mechanisms in the kidneys. The release of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor–binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), which induce cell cycle arrest, appears to be a marker of this protective response [12, 13].

We previously reported the value of the renal functional reserve (RFR), measured based on a preoperative high-oral protein load, for the prediction of AKI in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery [14]. In the present study, we sought to examine whether protein loading itself may affect the development of AKI and long-term renal function after cardiac surgery in comparison with that in matched controls with similar demographic, risk, and surgical profiles who received standard preoperative care. Furthermore, we used in vitro cell culture models involving primary human kidney proximal and distal tubule cells to elucidate the potential mechanism by which protein might stimulate kidney-protective effects directly at the tubular level.

Methods

Study design and participants

This single-center, non-blinded, cohort study included patients enrolled in the prospective “Preoperative RFR Predicts Risk of AKI after Cardiac Operation” study [14]. The study included 110 adults with eGFR [15] values ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass, valve replacement, a combination of the two, or other surgery, with cardiopulmonary bypass) between November 2014 and October 2015 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy. Detailed methods including surgical care are described in the Additional file 1. Notably, patients who did not discontinue treatment with renin–angiotensin-system blockers (part of the standard procedure at the Department of Cardiac Surgery in Vicenza), within a minimum of 48 h before admission were excluded.

The study protocol has been described in detail elsewhere [14]. Briefly, patients received a high-oral protein load (1.2 g/kg bodyweight of unsalted red cooked meat protein without additives) to assess their RFR the day before surgery in addition to standard preoperative care [14] and at 3 months post-surgery in the outpatient setting [16]. Approximately one week prior to RFR assessment, participants were given exact instructions about medication (no nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, no renin–angiotensin-system blockers) that were allowed on the morning of the examination. Estimates of the potential effect and variance of protein intake on GFR were obtained from previous publications [17, 18]. Furthermore, the high-oral protein load was defined according to a recent dose testing, which suggested a ceiling effect with an upper limit of maximal obtainable GFR following a high-oral protein intake ≥ 1 g/kg bodyweight [19]. Results of the bioimpedance vector analysis in the protein loading group are provided in the Additional file 1: Table S1. The control group was identified through a propensity score analysis conducted on the covariates of age, gender, race, cardiac disease, and baseline eGFR undergoing similar procedures around the period during which the RFR cohort underwent surgery (range: 0–3 months) using a 1:2 ratio matching method (for other eligibility criteria see Additional file 1). The control patients received standard preoperative care, which was defined pragmatically. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (79/16F) and complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients were approached for enrollment during admission consultations and provided written informed consent.

Procedures and measurements

Evaluation of kidney function

AKI was defined according to the KDIGO workgroup criteria as an increase in SCr by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl within 48 h or ≥ 1.5-times the baseline value within 7 days or urine output < 0.5 ml/kg/h for 6 h [20]. Baseline SCr was determined based on all available SCr values from hospital and outpatient medical records within the previous 90 days. Those whose baseline SCr level data were unavailable, we expanded the screening criteria to an increase or decrease in SCr by 0.3 mg/dL during the hospital stay. Positive fluid balance and hemodilution are considered in the diagnosis and staging of AKI using the following formula [21]:

$${\text{Adjusted SCr level}}\, = \,{\text{SCr}}\, \times \,{\text{correction factor}}$$

where the correction factor = (weight (kg) upon hospital admission × 0.6 + Σ (daily cumulative fluid balance (liter)))/hospital admission weight × 0.6

AKI reversal was defined as the absence of any stage of AKI at hospital discharge [22]. All cases were reviewed on a case-by-case basis to confirm each diagnosis of AKI and AKI reversal by a blinded adjudication committee comprising three expert nephrologists blinded to clinical data. If two reviewers disagreed, a third reviewer provided input and a consensus was developed. Spot urine for albuminuria were collected prior to surgery, and at 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Albuminuria was normalized to the urinary creatinine concentration to account for urine dilution. Information on sample collection and laboratory methods are provided in Additional file 1.

Follow-up and endpoints

Clinical outcomes were evaluated for 1 year after discharge. Changes in medication for clinical reasons were permitted. At 3 and 12 months of follow-up, analyses were conducted at the Outpatient Nephrology Department, and patients were contacted via the telephone 1 week before the follow-up analyses and advised to maintain their usual dietary habits and avoid high dietary protein intake (> 0.8 g/kg body weight per day). A high-oral protein diet during the follow-period was not intended as per study protocol. Patients were again advised to suspend renin–angiotensin-system blockers and non-steroidal inflammatory drugs a minimum of 48 h prior to outpatient presentation. The primary endpoint was AKI within 7 days post-cardiac surgery. Additional measures included the difference in eGFR at 3 and 12 months post-surgery compared to the preoperative values (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). The use of any potentially nephrotoxic drugs was recorded during the hospital stay.

Protein load and biomarker secretion in human kidney tubule cells

Secretion of the AKI biomarkers IGFBP7 and TIMP-2 after protein loading was assessed using our established in vitro model systems of primary human proximal and distal tubule cells [23]. Immunoaffinity isolated proximal and distal tubule cells were cultured at confluence on Transwell permeable supports in hormonally defined, serum-free media to form epithelial monolayers. The cells were then treated on the apical side with increasing concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 50 µM) of protein (Life Extension, Wellness Code® Whey Protein Concentrate; amino acid profile provided in Additional file 1) for 6 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Apical conditioned media were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis to detect secreted IGFBP7 and TIMP-2 by using goat polyclonal antibodies provided by Astute Medical Inc. Raw immunoblot signals were normalized to the lysate concentration, and the signal from whey-treated cells was compared to that from untreated cells and graphs were generated. Four separate donor isolates to assess IGFBP7 and three separate isolates to assess TIMP-2 were used. The average µM concentration of whey protein was based upon the molecular weight of β-lactoglobulin.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive variables were expressed as median (interquartile range) or means [95% confidence interval] for continuous variables, and n (%) for categorical variables. Differences in the distributions between groups were tested using Mann–Whitney U tests for numeric variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Changes in eGFR and SCr were calculated in patients as the difference in the values at follow-up and 1 day before surgery (before protein loading). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes. Conditional distributions of the response variables showed a sufficiently good approximation to the normal distribution, as assessed using normal quantile–quantile plots. Data were analyzed using R 3.6.0 (R Center for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [24]. Two-tailed p values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Sample size estimation was based on a recent observational study in a similar patient population [25] and on the primary endpoint (i.e., AKI development within 7 days post-cardiac surgery). Using the Fisher’s exact test, we calculated that 339 patients (226 patients in the control group and 113 patients in the protein-loading group) would be required to provide 80% power at a type 1 error of 5% to detect an AKI poportion of 0.2 and 0.05 and a group weight of 2:1, respectively. Nearest neighbor matching with a propensity score caliper distance of 0.1 was employed to select patients treated with standard care to be included in the control group. A 1:2 ratio matching method was used. An optimal quality match was defined as a standardized mean difference (SMD) ≤ 0.1 per matching variable between patients in the study and control groups. The time course of eGFR values relative to preoperative values was analyzed with a linear mixed model by using the logarithm of the relative eGFR values. The differences for categorical variables between groups were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. For the in vitro studies, immunoblot films were imaged and quantitated using ImageJ and the paired t-test function of GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).

Results

Baseline characteristics

Of the 540 patients screened for the study, 324 were enrolled and included in the analysis. 110 patients received preoperative high-oral protein loading as part of the RFR study, whereas 214 patients were matched to the protein-loading group (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). The matching quality was considered excellent, as reflected by an SMD ≤ 0.1 for all matching variables. The baseline characteristics and surgical data were similar between both groups (Table 1). The eGFR values at hospital admission were similar in both the protein loading and control groups (90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 87–92] vs. 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI 88–92], respectively; p = 0.914).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort
Full size table

AKI rates

The rate of AKI was not different between the protein loading and control groups (15/110 [13.6%] vs 26/214 [12.1%], p = 0.5; using full AKI staging: p = 0.945; Table 2). All patients who developed AKI experienced only one distinct episode of AKI throughout the hospital stay. The correction of SCr for fluid balance did not affect the diagnosis and staging of AKI. All 15 patients in the protein-loading group developed AKI according to the SCr criteria, and none met the urine output criteria. In contrast, in the control group, staging was performed according to the SCr and urine output criteria in 19 (9.0%) and 4 (1.9%) patients, respectively; 3 (1.4%) patients fulfilled both criteria (p = 0.110). Of note, two patients in the control group required postoperative kidney replacement therapy, whereas none in the protein-loading group required such therapy. All 15 patients in the protein-loading group who developed AKI exhibited AKI reversal before hospital discharge, but only 21 of 26 patients in the control group who experienced AKI exhibited AKI reversal before hospital discharge (100% vs. 80.8%; p = 0.139). Summary statistics of all patients categorized by AKI are reported in the Additional file 1: Table S2. Those with AKI were more likely than those without AKI to be older; have a higher body mass index; have hypertension, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vasculopathy, and dyslipidemia; and have lower eGFR values at admission.

Table 2 Outcomes
Full size table

Changes in eGFR

Over the first 7 days after surgery, mean eGFR started increasing on day 4. The increase was more pronounced in the protein-loading group than in the control group (p < 0.001; Fig. 1), reaching 120% of the preoperative value on day 7 after surgery.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Changes in eGFR. eGFR by study day for patients receiving preoperative protein loading or standard preoperative care, change from preoperative values. p < 0.001 for the interaction day:group. Light grey: patients receiving standard preoperative care; dark grey: patients receiving preoperative high-oral protein load. The points are mean values with error bars, indicating the 95% confidence intervals. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate

Full size image

At hospital discharge, almost all patients (98.5%) had a normal renal function, as defined by the eGFR (≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.774). The eGFR values at 3 and 12 months after surgery in both groups are shown in Figs. 2a, 3a, and are listed in Table 3a. The changes in eGFR values, relative to the preoperative values, per patient are shown in Figs. 2b, 3b, and are listed in Table 3b. At both time points, the patients in the protein-loading group showed higher eGFR values than those in the control group (90 [95% CI 87–93] vs. 86 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI 84–88], p = 0.028 at 3 months; and 87 [95% CI 84–90] vs. 79 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI 77–81], p < 0.001 at 12 months). This effect was also visible among patients who did not develop AKI (91 [95% CI 89–94] vs. 87 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI 85–89], p = 0.011 at 3 months; and 89 [95% CI 86–91] vs. 81 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI 79–83], p < 0.001 at 12 months). The data for patients who developed AKI was insufficient to interpret the difference in eGFR levels between the groups. However, the mean decrease in eGFR levels per patient after 12 months was less pronounced in the protein-loading group for patients who developed AKI (− 8 [95% CI − 14 to − 1.9] vs. − 19 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI − 23 to  − 14], p = 0.008 for all AKI cases; and − 8 [95% CI − 13 to  − 3.2] vs. − 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI − 19 to  − 11], p = 0.022 for AKI reversal cases). Patients without AKI reversal exhibited the highest risk for long-term renal function loss, with a mean eGFR loss of –35.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI − 60.9 to − 9.1]. Results remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders.

Fig. 2
figure 2

eGFR among patients receiving a high-oral protein load compared to those receiving standard preoperative care. a eGFR at the time of admission as well at 3 and 12 months after surgery. b Change in eGFR relative to the time of admission. Light grey: patients receiving standard preoperative care; dark grey: patients receiving preoperative high-oral protein load. The points are mean values with error-bars, indicating the 95% confidence intervals. The number of patients at different time points for each group are provided in parentheses. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

eGFR categorized on the basis of the occurrence of AKI and the AKI reversal status among patients receiving a preoperative high-oral protein load compared to those receiving standard preoperative care. a eGFR at the time of admission and at 3 and 12 months after surgery. b Changes in the eGFR relative to the time of admission. Light grey: patients with standard preoperative care; dark grey: patients receiving a preoperative high-oral protein load. The number of patients in each group at different time points are provided in parentheses. AKI, acute kidney injury; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate

Full size image
Table 3 eGFR among patients receiving high-oral protein loading, compared to that in patients receiving standard care prior to cardiac surgery
Full size table

Over the 12-month follow-up period, the mean eGFR change per month in the protein-loading group was − 0.23 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI − 0.54 to  − 0.08], as compared to − 0.83 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI − 1.05– − 0.61] in the control group. The mean difference in these slopes was 0.60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ([95% CI 0.22–0.97]; p = 0.002; Fig. 2a). The changes in SCr are described in the Additional file 1; Fig. S4.

Changes in albuminuria

There were no detectable differences in albuminuria between the protein loading vs. the control group at hospital admission (29.7 mg/g [95% CI 10.7–48.6] vs. 32.6 [95% CI 12.1–54.2], p = 0.457) and at 3 months after surgery (115.1 mg/g [95% CI 26.3–203.9] vs. 165.2 mg/g [95% CI 34.7–267.7], p = 0.063). However, patients in the protein loading group as compared to the control group had lower levels of albuminuria at 12 months after surgery (125.3 mg/g [95% CI 25.5–225.3] vs. 193.8 mg/g [95% CI 26.4–302.4], p = 0.015). The result remained significant after adjustment for potential confounders.

TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 secretion in in vitro model systems

We next assessed whether a high protein load could affect kidney tubule cells directly using an in vitro cell culture model system to determine whether protein administration mediates the release of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7. We had previously identified that IGFBP7 secretion is primarily a proximal tubule phenomenon, and TIMP2 expression and secretion are distal tubule phenomena [23]; therefore, biomarker secretion was assessed in the appropriate systems with increasing doses of exogenous protein (Fig. 4). This analysis identified that application of dietary protein directly onto kidney tubule epithelial cells of proximal and distal tubule origin is indeed capable of inducing a statistically significant increase in the amounts of both biomarkers in the apical (luminal) conditioned media.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of dietary protein dose response treatment of primary human kidney tubule cells on the presence of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 in the apical conditioned media. Isolated primary human proximal and distal tubule cells were subjected to dose–response analysis with whey protein, and secretion of the AKI biomarkers IGFBP7 and TIMP2 was assessed by immunoblot analysis of apical conditioned media. Densitometry values for (A) IGFBP7 from proximal tubule cells (4 genetically different samples) and (B) TIMP-2 from distal tubule cells (3 genetically different samples) were adjusted to protein concentration and normalized to no treatment. Asterisks indicate statistical significance from no treatment (p < 0.05). AKI, acute kidney injury; IGFBP7, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-2

Full size image

Discussion

Key findings

In patients with presurgical eGFR values ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergoing cardiac surgery, a preoperative high-oral protein load did not reduce the occurrence of perioperative AKI, but was associated with an improved eGFR postoperatively and more preserved eGFR at 3 and 12 months after surgery, even after stratification based on the occurrence of AKI. Additionally, we validated an experimental proof of concept in vitro that direct interaction of dietary protein with kidney tubule cells can increase the amounts of biomarkers implicated in cell cycle arrest and tubule cell protection in apical media.

Relationship to previous studies

Protein intake reportedly increases renal blood flow and GFR in healthy humans, and at any given level of protein intake, GFR is greater in younger than in older individuals and greater in women and men [26]. Although patients with CKD are likely to exhibit progression to advanced stages more rapidly if they consume a high-protein diet over a prolonged period [27, 28], consistent with the hypothesis that the glomerular hemodynamic changes associated with persistent hyperfiltration accelerate glomerular injury [29], a short-term high-protein diet may induce reno-protective and restorative mechanisms. This hypothesis is based on animal models, in which protein loading was shown to protect the kidneys from ischemic insults when administered before the harmful exposure [11]. The specific mechanisms remain unclear but appear to involve effects beyond an increase in renal blood flow, since selective agents have not been effective at preserving GFR post-cardiac surgery [5]. The additional direct effects of a high protein load on kidney tubular cells—the cells most affected in AKI—remains unclear.

Proteins, once filtered at the glomerular level, are normally almost entirely reabsorbed at the proximal tubular level [30]. Experimental studies indicate that protein overload of tubule cells may elicit tubular epithelial injury and peritubular inflammation through upregulation of inflammatory and fibrogenic genes and production of related proteins [31,32,33]. Further, apoptosis and autophagy are other mechanisms that underlie protein-induced tubular cell injury [34, 35]. As such, protein overload has been reported to cause a dose- and duration-dependent induction of apoptosis in cultured proximal tubule cells [34].

However, the protein loads administered in this study were well within normal dietary variations and were not likely to induce damage to kidney cells as described above. Nevertheless, we speculate that these levels may have “stressed” the kidney in a manner analogous to preconditioning with ischemia [36]. Zarbock and coworkers recently showed that the protective effects of RIPC are dependent on eliciting a kidney stress response quantified by urinary biomarkers TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 [12, 13]. While these same biomarkers have been shown to predict AKI after cardiac surgery [37, 38], their release in response to sub-injurious noxious stimuli may invoke a protective response.

Mechanistically, TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 are two independent proteins that are released in response to proximal and distal tubular insults and are thought to be engaged in self-protective mechanisms such as AKI-induced transient cell cycle arrest [37, 39, 40]. A recent trial involving patients undergoing cardiac surgery demonstrated that preoperative RIPC reduced postoperative AKI [12]. Moreover, the effectiveness of this intervention was dependent on the release of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 since no protection was observed in a patient who did not respond to RIPC with an increase in TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 before surgery. Conversely, patients exhibiting this response showed a reduced rate of AKI. These findings substantiated our hypothesis that the release of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 elicited by sub-injurious stimuli (e.g., brief ischemic preconditioning) may indicate an adaptive and desensitizing response of kidney tubule cells to subsequent inflammatory and ischemic injury [41]. On the basis of our experimental model, we speculate that a short-term high dietary protein load in patients with normal renal function may act similar to ischemic preconditioning by inducing a protective response through the release of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7.

Study strengths and limitations

In line with a recent pilot study [42], our results suggest that a preoperative high-oral protein load may influence renal outcomes post-cardiac surgery, even though it does not reduce the occurrence of perioperative AKI. Consistent with previous publications [25], our findings emphasize the incorporation of longer follow-up periods to determine the effects of any intervention on renal function beyond a simple reduction in perioperative AKI. Other strengths of the study include SCr measurements under rigorous conditions, the use of a blinded adjudication committee for renal outcome measure assessments, suspension of renin–angiotensin-system blockers prior to surgery and outpatient visits, the low dropout rate, and the provision of an experimental proof of concept of a potential mechanism of action of positive long-term outcomes. Notably, the in vitro work was intentionally designed to be a simple proof of concept experiment to identify whether or not protein load can have a direct effect on kidney tubule cells and biomarker presence in the conditioned media/urine. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of action by which high-oral protein loading may induce kidney-protective effects (including techniques for specific blockage). TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were chosen as biomarkers of interest as both are one of the few markers potentially implicated in kidney protection as opposed to kidney damage (i.e., neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and liver-type fatty acid binding protein). It is noteworthy that the different trends of both biomarkers following increasing doses of exogenous protein was not unexpected. Indeed, a significant finding in our initial publication on IGFBP7 and TIMP-2 in human kidney cells [23] was that the biomarkers primarily originate from different regions of the nephron, where IGFBP7 is primarily secreted by proximal tubule cells, and TIMP-2 is expressed and secreted only from cells of distal tubule origin. Given that proximal and distal tubule cells are differentially affected by insults, different molecules at different concentrations and/or temporal modulations are likely to be used to induce the response necessary for the protection of that cell type (e.g. cell cycle arrest). Secondly, while the arithmetic product of these biomarkers ([TIMP-2]•[IGFBP7]) was identified as the best for the prediction of the onset of AKI in the critically ill patient [37], there is no clear biological association between the two. While both can affect cell cycle arrest, IGFBP7 is involved in the insulin signaling nexus [43], and TIMP-2 is involved in the extracellular matrix remodeling nexus [44], and there is currently no known biological association between both biomarkers that would suggest an expectation that their secretion profiles should behave similarly. Lastly, while both biomarkers together provide the most specific prediction of AKI, each biomarker alone can be more predictive in different etiologies of AKI (e.g., sepsis versus cardiac surgery), demonstrating that the secretion profiles of each biomarker are differentially affected by different effector molecules specific for each etiology.

Our findings may have important implications for clinical practice. First, recent evidence has shown that the AKI risk after cardiac surgery is potentially modifiable [45]. However, this finding was determined on the basis of early postoperative biomarker assessment, which identified high-risk patients and linked them to a “care bundle”. Although this strategy is effective, it requires careful coordination between biomarker measurement and postoperative care. If our results can be confirmed by trials adequately powered to detect improvements in renal outcome, a preoperative high-protein diet may represent a simple and cost-efficient treatment for preserving long-term GFR. Certainly, a preoperative treatment with high-oral protein load may be more convenient and easier to replicate compared to a treatment with intravenous amino acid infusion. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms underlying the potential protective effects of short-term protein loading on renal function.

Our study had limitations, including its non-blinded, non-randomized, and single-center design as well as the relatively low AKI rate. However, the measures of renal function were based on objective assays conducted by a central laboratory unaware of the group allocation. Moreover, the low occurrence of AKI was expected since we excluded patients with reduced eGFR, and selected patients with low comorbidities, elective surgical procedures, and a high rate of minimally invasive surgery; all factors associated with low AKI rates [46]. Besides, our results should be interpreted with caution, since estimates of renal function solely based on SCr may lead to overestimation of GFR [47]. We did not have information on the food composition of standard preoperative care provided in the cardiac surgery unit. However, given that both groups received the same standard preoperative care, it is unlikely that the composition had a major effect on the observed results. Furthemore, the amount of protein provided in the form of cooked meat prior to surgery may be stressful for some patients and cumbersome to implement into clinical practice. Thus, alternative more feasible preparations for protein loading should be investigated (e.g., using protein powder). Surrogate markers for estimation of protein intake (e.g., using the Maroni’s method) may be considered in future trials. Moreover, patients in the protein loading vs. the control group required more perioperative red blood cell transfusion, which may have influenced the results. It should be noted, however, that the need for perioperative red blood cell transfusion did not differ when categorized by the occurrence of AKI. Finally, we did not have information on diet and medication between the both groups during the first year after surgery except on the use of renin–angiotensin-system blockers, which remain to be vital confounding factors for the final results.

Conclusions

In summary, among patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a preoperative high-oral protein load did not reduce the occurrence of AKI (in comparison with standard care) but was associated with an improved eGFR postoperatively and more preserved eGFR at 12 months, even after stratification based on the occurrence of AKI. The potential mechanisms of action by which short-term protein loading induces a kidney-protective response may include the maintenance of renal blood flow and cell cycle inhibition of renal tubular epithelial cells. The observed preservation of renal function in the protein-loading group warrants further investigation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute kidney injury

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

GFR:

Glomerular filtration rate

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

IGFBP7:

Insulin-like growth factor–binding protein 7

RIPC:

Remote ischemic preconditioning

SCr:

Serum creatinine

TIMP-2:

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-2

References

  1. Ortega-Loubon C, Fernandez-Molina M, Carrascal-Hinojal Y, Fulquet-Carreras E. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016;19:687–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hobson CE, Yavas S, Segal MS, Schold JD, Tribble CG, Layon AJ, Bihorac A. Acute kidney injury is associated with increased long-term mortality after cardiothoracic surgery. Circulation. 2009;119:2444–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coca SG, Singanamala S, Parikh CR. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81:442–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Priyanka P, Zarbock A, Izawa J, Gleason TG, Renfurm RW, Kellum JA. The impact of acute kidney injury by serum creatinine or urine output criteria on major adverse kidney events in cardiac surgery patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;162(143–151): e147.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nadim MK, Forni LG, Bihorac A, Hobson C, Koyner JL, Shaw A, Arnaoutakis GJ, Ding X, Engelman DT, Gasparovic H, et al. Cardiac and vascular surgery-associated acute kidney injury: the 20th International Consensus Conference of the ADQI (acute disease quality initiative) Group. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7: e008834.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Bellomo R. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13:697–711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeppsson A, Ekroth R, Friberg P, Kirno K, Milocco I, Nilsson F, Svensson S. Renal effects of amino acid infusion in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2000;14:51–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabbai FB. The role of renal response to amino acid infusion and oral protein load in normal kidneys and kidney with acute and chronic disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018;27:23–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Woods LL. Mechanisms of renal hemodynamic regulation in response to protein feeding. Kidney Int. 1993;44:659–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Badalamenti S, Gines P, Arroyo V, Llach J, Piera C, Rimola A, Jimenez W, Gaya J, Casamitjana R, Rivera F, et al. Effects of intravenous amino acid infusion and dietary proteins on kidney function in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1990;11:379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts PR, Black KW, Zaloga GP. Enteral feeding improves outcome and protects against glycerol-induced acute renal failure in the rat. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:1265–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zarbock A, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Martens S, Zahn PK, Wolf B, Goebel U, Schwer CI, Rosenberger P, et al. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney injury among high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313:2133–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meersch M, Kullmar M, Pavenstadt H, Rossaint J, Kellum JA, Martens S, Klausmeyer P, Schmidt EA, Kerschke L, Zarbock A. Effects of different doses of remote ischemic preconditioning on kidney damage among patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a single-center mechanistic randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:e690–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Husain-Syed F, Ferrari F, Sharma A, Danesi TH, Bezerra P, Lopez-Giacoman S, Samoni S, de Cal M, Corradi V, Virzi GM, et al. Preoperative renal functional reserve predicts risk of acute kidney injury after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1094–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Husain-Syed F, Ferrari F, Sharma A, Hinna Danesi T, Bezerra P, Lopez-Giacoman S, Samoni S, de Cal M, Corradi V, Virzi GM, et al. Persistent decrease of renal functional reserve in patients after cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury despite clinical recovery. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34:308–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fliser D, Zeier M, Nowack R, Ritz E. Renal functional reserve in healthy elderly subjects. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993;3:1371–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Solling K, Christensen CK, Solling J, Christiansen JS, Mogensen CE. Effect on renal haemodynamics, glomerular filtration rate and albumin excretion of high oral protein load. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1986;46:351–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma A, Zaragoza JJ, Villa G, Ribeiro LC, Lu R, Sartori M, Faggiana E, de Cal M, Virzi GM, Corradi V, et al. Optimizing a kidney stress test to evaluate renal functional reserve. Clin Nephrol. 2016;86:18–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute kidney injury work group. kdigo clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2:1–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2012.1.

  21. Macedo E, Bouchard J, Soroko SH, Chertow GM, Himmelfarb J, Ikizler TA, Paganini EP, Mehta RL, Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease. Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14:R82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kellum JA, Sileanu FE, Bihorac A, Hoste EA, Chawla LS. Recovery after acute kidney injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:784–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Emlet DR, Pastor-Soler N, Marciszyn A, Wen X, Gomez H, Humphries WH, Morrisroe S, Volpe JK, Kellum JA. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2: differential expression and secretion in human kidney tubule cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017;312:F284–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. R Core Team: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020. https://www.R-projectorg/.

  25. Garg AX, Devereaux PJ, Yusuf S, Cuerden MS, Parikh CR, Coca SG, Walsh M, Novick R, Cook RJ, Jain AR, et al. Kidney function after off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311:2191–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Navar LG, Maddox DA, Munger KA. The renal circulations and glomerular filtration. In: Yu ASL, Chertow GM, Luyckx VA, Mardsen PA, Skorecki K, Taal MW, editors. Brenner and rector’s the kidney. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 80–114.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lew QJ, Jafar TH, Koh HW, Jin A, Chow KY, Yuan JM, Koh WP. Red meat intake and risk of ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Knight EL, Stampfer MJ, Hankinson SE, Spiegelman D, Curhan GC. The impact of protein intake on renal function decline in women with normal renal function or mild renal insufficiency. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:460–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brenner BM, Lawler EV, Mackenzie HS. The hyperfiltration theory: a paradigm shift in nephrology. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1774–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Makrides V, Camargo SM, Verrey F. Transport of amino acids in the kidney. Compr Physiol. 2014;4:367–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Abbate M, Zoja C, Remuzzi G. How does proteinuria cause progressive renal damage? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2974–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tang S, Leung JC, Abe K, Chan KW, Chan LY, Chan TM, Lai KN. Albumin stimulates interleukin-8 expression in proximal tubular epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:515–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zoja C, Donadelli R, Colleoni S, Figliuzzi M, Bonazzola S, Morigi M, Remuzzi G. Protein overload stimulates RANTES production by proximal tubular cells depending on NF-kappa B activation. Kidney Int. 1998;53:1608–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Erkan E, De Leon M, Devarajan P. Albumin overload induces apoptosis in LLC-PK(1) cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;280:F1107-1114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Periyasamy-Thandavan S, Jiang M, Schoenlein P, Dong Z. Autophagy. molecular machinery, regulation, and implications for renal pathophysiology. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2009;297:F244-256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Er F, Nia AM, Dopp H, Hellmich M, Dahlem KM, Caglayan E, Kubacki T, Benzing T, Erdmann E, Burst V, Gassanov N. Ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: randomized pilot RenPro Trial (Renal Protection Trial). Circulation. 2012;126:296–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kashani K, Al-Khafaji A, Ardiles T, Artigas A, Bagshaw SM, Bell M, Bihorac A, Birkhahn R, Cely CM, Chawla LS, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013;17:R25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Martens S, Rossaint J, Singbartl K, Gorlich D, Kellum JA, Zarbock A. Urinary TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 as early biomarkers of acute kidney injury and renal recovery following cardiac surgery. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e93460.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang QH, Liu DW, Long Y, Liu HZ, Chai WZ, Wang XT. Acute renal failure during sepsis: potential role of cell cycle regulation. J Infect. 2009;58:459–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Devarajan P. Update on mechanisms of ischemic acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:1503–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zarbock A, Kellum JA. Remote ischemic preconditioning and protection of the kidney—a novel therapeutic option. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:607–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pu H, Doig GS, Heighes PT, Allingstrup MJ, Wang A, Brereton J, Pollock C, Chesher D, Bellomo R. Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney protection in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:2356–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang S, Chi K, Wu D, Hong Q. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in kidney disease. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12: 807119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang Z, Famulski K, Lee J, Das SK, Wang X, Halloran P, Oudit GY, Kassiri Z. TIMP2 and TIMP3 have divergent roles in early renal tubulointerstitial injury. Kidney Int. 2014;85:82–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Meersch M, Schmidt C, Hoffmeier A, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Gerss J, Zarbock A. Prevention of cardiac surgery-associated AKI by implementing the KDIGO guidelines in high risk patients identified by biomarkers: the PrevAKI randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1551–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:455–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Inker LA, Schmid CH, Tighiouart H, Eckfeldt JH, Feldman HI, Greene T, Kusek JW, Manzi J, Van Lente F, Zhang YL, et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:20–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the nursing staff of Cardiac Surgery, the Intensive Care Unit, and Nephrology for their efforts and commitment to the patient well-being. Without their support, this work would not have been possible.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. There was no funding source for this study. Antibodies for TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were generously supplied by Astute Medical, La Jolla, CA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, International Renal Research Institute of Vicenza, San Bortolo Hospital, Via Rodolfi, 37, 36100, Vicenza, Italy

    Faeq Husain-Syed, Fiorenza Ferrari, Pércia Bezerra, Salvador Lopez-Giacoman, Gianluca Villa, Claudio Ronco, Carlotta Caprara, Valentina Corradi, Massimo Cal, Carla Estremadoyro, Renhua Lu, Sara Samoni, Aashish Sharma & Grazia Maria Virzì

  2. Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Faeq Husain-Syed, Khodr Tello, Horst-Walter Birk & Werner Seeger

  3. Center for Critical Care Nephrology, CRISMA, Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA

    David R. Emlet, Dana Y. Fuhrman & John A. Kellum

  4. Institute for Lung Health, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Ludwigstrasse 23, 35390, Giessen, Germany

    Jochen Wilhelm

  5. Department of Cardiac Surgery, San Bortolo Hospital, Via Rodolfi, 37, 36100, Vicenza, Italy

    Tommaso Hinna Danesi & Loris Salvador

  6. Intensive Care Unit, I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Camillo Golgi, 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy

    Fiorenza Ferrari

  7. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnaci, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0558, USA

    Tommaso Hinna Danesi

  8. Department of Health Science, Section of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Florence, Piazza San Marco, 4, 50121, Florence, Italy

    Gianluca Villa

  9. Member of the German Centre for Lung Research, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Centre, Klinikstrasse 33, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Khodr Tello & Werner Seeger

  10. Department of Lung Development and Remodelling, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Ludwigstrasse 43, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany

    Werner Seeger

  11. Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory, San Bortolo Hospital, Via Rodolfi, 37, 36100, Vicenza, Italy

    Davide Giavarina

  12. Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, One Children’s Hospital Way, 4401 Penn Ave, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA

    Dana Y. Fuhrman

  13. Department of Medicine (DIMED), Università di Padova, Via Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy

    Claudio Ronco

  14. Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Piazza San Marco, 4, 50121, Florence, Italy

    Lorenzo Tofani

Authors
  1. Faeq Husain-Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David R. Emlet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jochen Wilhelm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tommaso Hinna Danesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fiorenza Ferrari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pércia Bezerra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Salvador Lopez-Giacoman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gianluca Villa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Khodr Tello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Horst-Walter Birk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Werner Seeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Davide Giavarina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Loris Salvador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Dana Y. Fuhrman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. John A. Kellum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Claudio Ronco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the IRRIV-AKI Study Group

  • Carlotta Caprara
  • , Valentina Corradi
  • , Massimo Cal
  • , Carla Estremadoyro
  • , Renhua Lu
  • , Sara Samoni
  • , Aashish Sharma
  • , Lorenzo Tofani
  •  & Grazia Maria Virzì

Contributions

Study concept and design: FHS, DRE, THD, FF, SLG, LS, AS, DYF, JAK, and CR. CR conceived the concept underlying the study and is the senior author of the paper. Literature research and clinical advice: JW, THD, FF, PB, SLG, GV, KT, HWB, WS, DG, DG, LS, DYF, JAK, CR, CC, VC, MdC, CE, RL, SS, AS, LT, and GMV. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: FHS, DRE, JW, THD, PB, SLG, GV, KT, HWB, WS, DG, LS, DYF, JAK, CR, CC, VC, MdC, CE, RL, SS, AS, LT, and GMV. Adjudication of renal function: SS, HWB, and CR. Drafting of the manuscript: FHS, DRE, JW, JAK, and CR. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: FHS, DRE, JW, THD, FF, PB, SLG, GV, KT, HWB, WS, DG, LS, DYF, JAK, CR, CC, VC, MdC, CE, RL, SS, AS, LT, and GMV. Statistical analysis: DRE, GV, LT, and JW (except Fig. 4). Study supervision: JAK and CR. The authors shared study design, data collection, data analyses, and data interpretation, as well as preparation, review, and approval of the manuscript. The corresponding author had full access to all study data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faeq Husain-Syed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval by the local ethics committee (Comitato Etico per le Sperimentazioni Cliniche della Provincia di Vicenza) was granted before initiating enrollment (79/16F). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients by a member of the research team.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

KT has received speaking fees from Actelion and Bayer outside the submitted work. WS has received speaker/consultancy fees from Pfizer and Bayer Pharma AG outside the submitted work. JAK discloses inventorship on a patent application held by the Universities of Pittsburgh, and Munster, and Astute Medical (US2018/074054A1) for use of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 in conjunction with interventions to protect the kidney. CR reports support for acting as an advisory board member for ASAHI, Baxter, GE, Jafron, and Medtronic, and speaker’s fees from Astute, bioMérieux, B. Braun, Cytosorbents, ESTOR, FMC, and Toray, all unrelated to the submitted work. All other authors have declared that no conflict of interests exists.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Study flow chart. The diagram describes the protocol used for the enrolment of patients in the present study. ACEis, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; IV, intravenous; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Figure S2. Changes in eGFR among patients receiving high oral protein loading compared to those receiving standard care prior to cardiac surgery. The figure illustrates the changes in eGFR among patients receiving preoperative high oral protein loading (dark-grey circles), as compared to those in patients receiving standard care (light-grey circles) at different time points (a) and compared to the preoperative values (b). Horizontal lines indicate median values, boxes indicate the inter-quartile range, and whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum values. Data beyond the whiskers are plotted as outliers (circles). The number of patients in each group at different time points for each group are presented in parentheses. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate. Figure S3. Serum creatinine levels among patients receiving high oral protein loading compared to those receiving standard preoperative care prior to cardiac surgery. (a) Serum creatinine levels at the time of admission as well at 3 and 12 months after surgery. (b) Change in serum creatinine levels relative to the time of admission. Light grey: patients with standard preoperative care; dark grey: patients receiving preoperative high oral protein loading. Points are mean values with error bars indicating the 95% confidence intervals. The number of patients in each group at different time points for each group are presented in parentheses. Figure S4. Serum creatinine levels categorized by the occurrence of AKI and AKI reversal at hospital discharge among patients receiving preoperative high oral protein loading compared to those receiving standard preoperative care. (a) Serum creatinine levels at the time of admission as well at 3 and 12 months after surgery. (b) Change in serum creatinine levels, relative to the time of admission. Light grey: patients with standard preoperative care; dark grey: patients receiving preoperative high oral protein loading. Number of patients at different time points for each group are presented in parentheses. AKI, acute kidney injury. Table S1. Bioimpedance vector analysis of the protein loading group categorized by occurrence of postoperative AKI. Table S2. Baseline, operative, ICU and follow-up characteristics categorized by occurrence of AKI. Table S3. Serum creatinine levels among patients receiving high oral protein loading, as compared to those in patients receiving standard care prior to cardiac surgery.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Husain-Syed, F., Emlet, D.R., Wilhelm, J. et al. Effects of preoperative high-oral protein loading on short- and long-term renal outcomes following cardiac surgery: a cohort study. J Transl Med 20, 204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03410-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03410-x

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us