Open Access

HLA-dependent tumour development: a role for tumour associate macrophages?

  • Maddalena Marchesi1, 3,
  • Emilia Andersson1,
  • Lisa Villabona1,
  • Barbara Seliger2,
  • Andreas Lundqvist1,
  • Rolf Kiessling1 and
  • Giuseppe V Masucci1Email author
Journal of Translational Medicine201311:247

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-247

Received: 5 July 2013

Accepted: 1 October 2013

Published: 6 October 2013

Abstract

HLA abnormalities on tumour cells for immune escape have been widely described. In addition, cellular components of the tumour microenvironment, in particular myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and alternatively activated M2 tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), are involved in tumour promotion, progression, angiogenesis and suppression of anti-tumour immunity. However, the role of HLA in these activities is poorly understood. This review details MHC class I characteristics and describes MHC class I receptors functions. This analysis established the basis for a reflection about the crosstalk among the tumour cells, the TAMs and the cells mediating an immune response.

The tumour cells and TAMs exploit MHC class I molecules to modulate the surrounding immune cells. HLA A, B, C and G molecules down-regulate the macrophage myeloid activation through the interaction with the inhibitory LILRB receptors. HLA A, B, C are able to engage inhibitory KIR receptors negatively regulating the Natural Killer and cytotoxic T lymphocytes function while HLA-G induces the secretion of pro-angiogenic cytokines and chemokine thanks to an activator KIR receptor expressed by a minority of peripheral NK cells. The open conformer of classical MHC-I is able to interact with LILRA receptors described as being associated to the Th2-type cytokine response, triggering a condition for the M2 like TAM polarization. In addition, HLA-E antigens on the surface of the TAMs bind the inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A expressed by a subset of NK cells and activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes protecting from the cytolysis.

Furthermore MHC class II expression by antigen presenting cells is finely regulated by factors provided with immunological capacities. Tumour-associated macrophages show an epigenetically controlled down-regulation of the MHC class II expression induced by the decoy receptor DcR3, a member of the TNFR, which further enhances the M2-like polarization. BAT3, a positive regulator of MHC class II expression in normal macrophages, seems to be secreted by TAMs, consequently lacking its intracellular function, it looks like acting as an immunosuppressive factor.

In conclusion HLA could cover a considerable role in tumour-development orchestrated by tumour-associated macrophages.

Introduction

Macrophages are tissue phagocytic cells that display the main activity of clearance independently of immune cells. However, they can be activated in response to either innate or adaptive immune signals and they are able to shape their phenotype to fit the microenvironment. In an attempt to simplify their complexity, activated macrophages can be categorized into two distinct subtypes: classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) [1, 2]. M1 macrophages are activated in the presence of bacterial moieties (LPS) or Th1 cytokines (IFN-gamma). In mice, M1-associated markers include interleukin-12 (IL-12), inducible nitric oxide synthase 2 (iNOS2) and a high level of MHC class II molecules. Human macrophages do not show induction of iNOS2 under the same conditions, despite having a similar phenotype. They have an efficient antigen presentation capacity and, through interaction with Th1 cells and NK cells, they are able to kill pathogens and tumour cells. M1 macrophages antagonize tumourigenesis due to direct tumour-killing mechanisms and amplification of Th1 responses, providing a positive feedback loop in the anti-tumour response [1]. In contrast, M2 macrophages are activated in the presence of Th2 cells cytokines and basophil-secreted cytokines (IL4, IL13, IL33) or induced by immune complexes and TLR agonists as well as by IL-10 and glucocorticoids [35]. The expression of resistin-like alpha (FIZZ1), arginase-1, macrophage mannose receptor 1 and chitinase 3-like 3 identify mice M2 macrophages, while human M2 macrophages do not show induction of resistin-like-alpha, arginase 1 and chitinase 3-like 3 but they up regulate indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). Moreover, M2 macrophages produce several growth factors (IL-10, EGF, FGF, VEGF and TGF-beta) and they are also involved in parasite clearance and allergy. M2 macrophages may enhance tumour progression by releasing growth factors and products of the arginase-1/IDO pathway and by promoting tumour angiogenesis [6].

Solid tumours are infiltrated by a heterogeneous immune cell population, including different subsets of lymphoid and myeloid cells [7]. The infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) can represent an index of poor prognosis in different types of cancer [8].

Mantovani and collaborators, as a result of a literature review, suggest a switch of TAMs from M1-like to M2-like phenotype as an adaptation to microenvironment changes during tumour progression. In early carcinogenesis T cells drive M1-activated macrophages to eliminate tumour cells except in advanced stages of tumour progression where microenviromental signals result in M2 polarized TAMs that orchestrate smouldering, non-resolving tumour promoting inflammation [9, 10].

This fine property of TAMs to modulate their features in relation to different microenviromental conditions is clearly shown by Movahedi K. and co-authors [11]. Using a mammary adenocarcinoma model, they provide a dynamic picture in which a subset of precursor monocytes infiltrating the tumour gives rise to distinct TAM subsets. These subsets are different at the molecular and functional levels and were present in different intra-tumour microenvironments. TAMs with a high expression of MHC class II and M1 markers are confined in normoxic tumour areas, whereas M2-like TAMs with a low expression of MHC class II and significantly higher proangiogenic activity are found in hypoxic tumour areas. Moreover, these M2-like TAM subsets possess a poor antigen presenting capacity and could suppress T-cell activation by using different suppressive mechanisms such as: the secretion of protease like Arg-1 [12], the releasing of immunosuppressive cytokines like TGFbeta [8] and IL-10 [13] and of chemokine-like CCL18 [14] the membrane expression of B7-H1 [15] and BTN3A [16]. Importantly, the relative percentages of these distinct myeloid subpopulations dramatically changed as tumours progressed: the TAM subset expressing low MHC class II became gradually the more represented population of the myeloid tumour infiltrate [14].

The alterations of MHC class I molecules and cellular components involved in the antigen processing and presentation machinery have been widely described as one of the main mechanism adopt by various type of tumour cells to escape from the immune system. The frequency of the HLA class I abnormalities is highly variable in many solid and hematopoietic tumours.

These deviations include the complete absence or down-regulation of HLA class I expression or of HLA class I allo-specificities in frequent association to an impairment of a single or various members of the antigen processing and presenting machinery. In most cases, it seems that the HLA class I abnormalities result from a deregulation rather than a structural defect suggesting an intervention at the epigenetic, transcriptional and or posttranscriptional level [17]. This observation increase even more the importance of studying the crosstalk between the tumour cells and the microenvironment.

This review tries to provide a snapshot of the complex and dynamic scene of cancer HLA is the focus, but the subject matter has been broadened to include the tumour cells, the microenvironment and their interaction.

Classical and non-classical MHC class I

HLA-A, -B, -C

HLA-A and HLA-B antigens are constitutively expressed on macrophages and are not altered during macrophage differentiation [18], whereas HLA-C antigens are constitutively expressed at much lower levels. The reason for this is based on the necessity of maintaining the NK cell activation at a threshold that assures immunological surveillance. The regulation of HLA-C expression occurs at different steps of the biosynthesis pathway [19, 20]. The cytoplasmic tail of HLA-C contains internalization and lysosomal targeting signals that could be inhibited upon macrophage differentiation [18]. The consequences are that undifferentiated primary monocytes, similarly to other cell types, express low levels of HLA-C, while differentiated macrophages show an up-regulation of HLA-C expression.

The MHC class I complex can spontaneously dissociate and be released as Beta2-microglobulin free form by activated T lymphocytes [21], or can escape from the ER as free heavy chain Beta2-microglobulin and appears as a beta2-microglobulin-free form on the tumour cell surface [22].

Consequently, MHC class I molecules are present on the cell surface in two forms: one is the Beta2-microglobulin-associated form and the other is a free heavy chain (HC) with an open conformation. The equilibrium between these conformations on the cell surface can be modified by the activation state or by transformation [21]. The free HC of HLA-C molecules are commonly observed on normal cells like activated lymphocytes [23] and are stably expressed by melanoma cell lines [22].

Thus, HLA-C is characterized by a low affinity for Beta2-microglobulin and, therefore, it might be significantly expressed on the cell surface in the free heavy-chain form of activated macrophages [18]. The hypothetical role of HLA-C, both the B2-microglobulin associated form and the free HC form has still to be explored.

HLA-G

HLA-G consists of seven isoforms (four membrane-bound: from HLA-G1 to HLA-G4 and three soluble: from HLA-G5 to G7) that are generated by alternate splicing. In addition, soluble HLA-G could be shed by the proteolytic cleavage of membrane bound isoforms. The isoforms mainly described, the cell-surface HLA-G1 and the soluble form HLA-G5, are detected as Beta2-microglobulin-free heavy chains and as disulphide-bound homodimers and homotrimers [24, 25]. Zilberman et al. identify both surface and soluble HLA-G5 dimers in tumour cells and malignant ascites [26].

Multimeric MHC class I molecules in most cases are able to induce a more potent immune response in comparison with monomers [27]. In fact, dimers of HLA-G1 and HLA-G oligomers bind with increased affinity the inhibitory receptors of the leukocyte immunoglobulin-like family (ILT2 and ILT4) than monomers, resulting in an enhanced inhibitory function of myeloid cells in vitro[25, 28, 29] and in vivo[30, 31].

The different isoforms of HLA-G have been shown to be expressed both by the tumour cell and by tumour associated macrophages/monocytes in lung cancer, melanoma, breast cancer and neuroblastoma [3235] and by glioblastoma infiltrating microglia [36]. In addition, soluble HLA-G can be secreted in the peripheral blood of cancer patients [3744]. An interesting study shows that soluble factors released by neuroblastoma cells could reach the blood stream and induce a programme of “frustrated activation” with features of macrophage-like activated cells in systemic monocytes. Thus, the release of higher amounts of immune-suppressive soluble HLA-G and less IL12 indicates a shift towards a more anergic phenotype [45].

HLA-E

HLA-E surface expression requires the expression of certain MHC class I molecules including HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, and HLA-G (not HLA-F), which possess a nonameric peptide in their leader sequence capable of binding to HLA-E. This is usually co-expressed in HLA-G positive tissue [46, 47]. HLA-E cell surface expression is limited to extra villous trophoblast cells, endothelial cells of all types of vessels, B- and T lymphocytes, NK cells, monocytes and macrophages [48].

Moreover, HLA-E is expressed by tumour cells of the following cancers: colorectal, laryngeal, ovarian, breast, melanoma, lymphoma and glioma [4956]. The observed association of antigen processing defects, down-regulation of Beta2-microglobulin or other MHC I heavy chain genes and induction of HLA-E in malignant tissues suggests that HLA-E expression becomes independent by the action of the nonameric peptides expression [57]. The nonameric peptides are replaced by peptides derived from self-proteins [58] that confer invisibility by NK lysis [59].

HLA-E could be released in soluble forms by melanoma cells [54, 60]. Kren L. et al. detected HLA-E expression on tumour infiltrating microglia/macrophages in most cases of glioblastomas analysed, while HLA-E expression is lacking in normal microglia [36]. Since most tumour infiltrating microglia/macrophages are found at the border of the ischaemic area, hypoxic stimuli enhance the expression of the HLA-E and HLA-G-immune modulatory molecule [61] as far as it induces M2 polarization [11].

HLA-F

HLA-F is the least characterized member of the non-classical HLA class I molecules. It is intracellularly retained by almost all resting leukocytes, except B lymphoblastoid- and monocytic cell lines which express it on the cell membrane [62] but it may reach the cell surface under activation. HLA-F is not up-regulated in CD4+, CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells when they are activated, whereas, under identical conditions, CD4+, CD25- T cells show strong surface HLA-F expression. HLA-F could provide a signal that indicates an activated immune response to regulatory T cells and it could trigger the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokine leading to tolerance [63]. HLA-F is suggested as an unfavourable prognostic factor in patients affected by NSLC [64] and by oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma [65]. In addition, anti-HLA-F IgG is present in the sera derived from various types of cancer patients, but not in the sera derived from healthy donors [66].

HLA-F expression is entirely dependent on its cytoplasmic tail to exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Although it is not known if this pathway requires peptide binding, it is conceivable that export of HLA-F from ER may be a peptide independent pathway [67] even though HLA-F can bind to TAP molecules [68]. Consequently, it is expressed both as a Beta2-microglobulin-free HC form independently from TAP and as a heterodimer form with Beta2-microglobulin [62]. HLA-F surface expression is strictly dependent on the expression of MHC class I HC as far as it is downregulated upon perturbation of the same molecule. Moreover, MHC class I is able to interact with HLA-F only when it is in the form of an open conformer free of peptides. All these data suggest that the physical cis-interaction plays a role in the function of MHC class I molecule in activated immune cells [69].

The surface plasmon resonance studies show that tetrameric complexes of HLA-F are able to interact with affinity to the inhibitory receptors of the leukocyte immunoglobulin-like family ILT2 and ILT4 [70]. The emerging questions are, what are the roles of HLA-F on TAMs and of its interaction with MHCclass I molecules and with the receptors ILT2 and ILT4? The structure of classical and non classical MHC class I molecules is simplified in the Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of structure of MHC class I molecules and their receptors

MHC class I

CELL TYPE

Beta2 microglobulin associated form/RECEPTORS

Open conformer form/RECEPTORS

HLA A, B

Nearly all cells

+++

ILT2 ILT4 KIR3DL1/2

+/−

Tumor cells

+++/++/+

ILT2 ILT4 KIR3DL1/2

+++/++/+

ILT4 KIR3DL1/2

TAMs

?

 

?

HLA C

Nearly all cells

+

ILT2 ILT4 KIR2DL1/2/3

+/−

Activated immune cells

+/−

 

+++

ILT4 LILRA KIR2DL1/2/3

Tumor cells (melanoma)

+/−

 

+++

ILT4 LILRA KIR2DL1/2/3

TAMs

?

 

?

 

HLA G

Fetal derived placental cells

+++

ILT2 ILT4 KIR2DL4

?

 

Tumor cells (colorectal/laryngeal, ovarian/breast carcinoma, lymphoma, glioma, melanoma)

+

 

+++ (monomer/ dimer/trimer)

ILT4 KIR2DL4

TAMs

+

 

+++ (monomer/ dimer/trimer)

ILT4 KIR2DL4

HLA E

Extravillous trophoblast cells

+++ (MHC-I derived peptide)

NKG2A

?

 

Endothelial and immune cells

+++ (MHC-I derived peptide)

NKG2A

?

 

Tumor cells

+++ (self peptide)

NKG2A

?

 

TAMs

+++ (self peptide)

NKG2A

?

 

HLA F

Resting immune cells

-

 

-

 

Activated immune cells

+++

ILT2 ILT4

+++

ILT2 ILT4

Tumor cells (NSLC and esophageal carcinoma)

+++

ILT2 ILT4

+++

ILT2 ILT4

TAMs

?

 

?

 

MHC class I receptors

Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors

Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors (LILRs) are HLA receptors widely expressed by myeloid cells and their role as modulators of macrophage activation has been well described [71, 72]. Their importance in tumour immune escape can be foreseen by the observation that LILRs are exploited by viruses to evade from the immune system. A clear example is shown by a study conducted on HIV variant showing that a mutated immunodominant virus epitope linked to HLA-B2705 creates a better ligand for ILT4 on myelomonocytic cells and this interaction leads the antigen presenting cells (APCs) to a tolerogenic profile [73]. In a similar manner, CMV encodes epitopes which, linked to MHC class I molecules, is able to increase affinity to ILT2 compared with regular MHC class I molecules reducing antiviral immune surveillance [74].

The LILR family includes inhibitory (LILRB) and activating (LILRA) receptors. The best-characterized LILR members remain the inhibitory receptors LILRB1 (ILT2) and LILRB2 (ILT4). ILT2 is widely expressed on myeloid and lymphoid cells, while ILT4 is almost exclusively expressed on monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells. ILT2 and ILT4 bind in trans with a broad specificity [75] both classical and non-classical HLA class I molecules. These recognize the non-classical HLA-G with a higher affinity [76, 77]. Moreover, ILT2 cannot recognize the Beta2-free form of MHC class I [77]. In contrast, ILT4 can bind the Beta2-microglobulin-free classical MHC class I molecules, like HLA-B27 [78], HLA-C [79] as well as the non-classical Beta2-microglobulin-free HLA-G molecules [77]. This in trans interaction has a different affinity between the soluble forms of ILT2 and ILT4 and several MHC class I molecules [80]. Jones et al. studied LILRs binding to the products of >90 different HLA class I alleles [79]. ILT2 and ILT4 were linked to different HLA alleles with different strength in relation to amino acid motifs within the alpha3 region (polimorphisms) and HLA I class conformation. The ligation of individual HLA class I alleles to ILT2 and ILT4 may alter the signalling through the inhibitory receptor and consequently the level of activation of APCs. Actually, HLA allele B*3503 binds ILT4 significantly stronger than other HLA class I molecules do, independently of the presented epitopes [81]. Consequently, HIV-1-infected, HLA B*3503 carriers have APCs with poor functional properties and an accelerated HIV-1 disease.

Among activating receptors, LILRA1 marks monocytes, LILRA2 is expressed on monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils and basophils [82]. LILRA3 is a homologue of LILRA1 but lacks the transmembrane domain and is therefore a secreted molecule, mainly produced by macrophages [83]. These recognize MHC class I molecules [75]. On the other hand, LILRA1 and LILRA3 display a preference for specific alleles Beta2-microglobulin-free forms [79], most of which belong to the HLA-C locus [84].

While the affinity of ILT4 for free heavy chains of different MHC class I antigens results in a slightly reduced than completed MHC-I form, LILRA1 and LILRA3 only recognize open conformer, classical and non-classical HLA class I antigens, especially HLA-C alleles [79, 85]. LILRA1 binding to HLA-B27 has also been reported [78]. Another strong ligand for LILRA1 and LILRA3 is the free form of HLA-B*0801 [79], a component of the MHC 8.1 ancestral haplotype associated with autoimmune conditions mainly due to an exaggerated Th2-type cytokine response [84]. This haplotype is also predictive of a shorter progression free and overall survival in non-Hodgkin lymphoma [86] and in malignant melanoma [87].

We can suppose that macrophages dipped in tumour microenvironment and pushed by Th2-type cytokines, due to the interaction between LILRA and the complex ancestral haplotype-cancer antigen-differentiate in M2-like macrophages. Hence, this could explain how MHC 8.1 haplotype could work as a prognostic factor in patients affected by NHL and melanoma.

LILRA2 does not bind to MHC and the reason is linked to its extracellular domain, which reveals structural shifts of the corresponding MHC-binding amino acid residues in comparison with ILT2 or ILT4 [88]. This explains the lack of binding to MHC molecules. Moreover, it seems that LILRA2 forms a domain-swapped dimer. The structure described supports the dimer conformation in solution observed earlier, and implies a stress-induced regulation by dimerization. Thus, its stimulation, similar to LILRA1, induces the shift from a Th1 production (IL12) towards Th2 profile (IL-10). This is supported by an activating mutation located in the linker region of the receptor, responsible for a risk for some autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus and microscopic polyangiitis [82]. LILRA2 might be an immune modulator either by inhibiting DC differentiation or by stimulating an alternative macrophage differentiation pathway leading to a reduced antigen presenting capacity [89]. A role of LILRA receptors in TAMs could be postulated, but it has not yet been shown.

Moreover, the Beta2-microglobulin-free MHC I class molecules are able to cis-associate with LILR members modulating the receptor-mediated internalization and the signalling. The function of this interaction seems to be related to the ability of working as regulators of in trans ligand-receptor interactions amplifying or dampening the efficiency of the signalling [90]. The cis-interaction between MHC I class and ILT2 is well established in mast cells dampening cell activation [91]. No information is available on the role in TAMs.

Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR)

The Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) family regulates the activation state of NK cells upon recognition of MHC class I ligands on the surface of target cells [9294]. The inhibitor-receptors are expressed on the cell surface including KIR2DL1/2/3 and KIR3DL1/2. The first group recognizes HLA-C and the second group HLA-A and HLA-B. The activator receptor is KIR2DL4, which resides in the endosome. The only known ligand is HLA-G. Both soluble HLA-G5 and HLA-G, shed from the cell surface of transfected cells, are accumulated into endosomes that contain KIR2DL4 [95]. It is likely that the transient passage of KIR2DL4 at the cell surface, either by newly synthesized KIR2DL4 or by the recycling of endosomal KIR2DL4, is sufficient to capture soluble HLA-G and transport it to endosomes [96]. Analysis of the transcriptional response to activation via KIR2DL4 revealed the up-regulation of a restricted set of chemokines and cytokines, including IFN-gamma, TNFalfa, IL1Beta, IL6 and IL8 that can promote vascular remodelling either directly or indirectly by acting on other cell types in the local microenvironment [95, 97, 98].

The complex nonameric peptide-HLA-E links the heterodimer CD94/NKG2 receptor expressed by approximately 50% of NK and activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes [99]. The NKG2 family includes activating members like NKG2C and NKG2E and an inhibitory member NKG2A [100]. The complex nonameric peptide HLA-E binds the inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A with higher affinity than the other receptors. This determines the protection from HLA-E positive cells from NK and CTL dependent lysis [101, 102].

A comprehensive summary of MHC class I antigens, their receptors and function is shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3.
Table 2

Summary of MHC class I molecules expressed/released on/by tumor cells, the related ligands on myeloid cells and the function of their interaction

MHC (tumor cells)

RECEPTOR (myeloid cells)

FUNCTION

References

Membrane HLA-G1 and soluble HLA-G5

ILT2 and ILT4 on macrophages/TAMs

- Up-regulation of LILRB receptor on macrophages/TAMs

- LeMaoult J., 2005 [130]

  

- Turning-down macrophage activation level

- Jones D.C., 2011 [79]

Membrane HLA-A-B-C

ILT2 and ILT4 on macrophages/TAMs

- Turning-down macrophage activation level

- Jones D.C., 2011 [79]

 

LILRA1 and LILRA3 on macrophages/TAMs

- Stimulation of the alternative macrophage differentation

- Lee D.J., 2007 [89]

Soluble HLA-G5

ILT2 and ILT4 on macrophages/TAMs

- Secretion of TGFbeta1 resulting in blood monocytes recruitment and suppression of their cytotoxic function

- McIntire R.H., 2004 [122]

- Ashcroft G.S., 1999 [123]

 

ILT2 on MDSC

-Expansion of MDSC with enhanced suppressive activity

- Zhang W., 2008 [124]

  

-Secretion of Th2 cytokines able to skew the alternative macrophage differentation

- Agaugue S., 2011 [125]

 

ILT4 on monocytes

- Inhibition of maturation of monocyte-derived APC

- Ristich V., 2005 [129]

  

- Development of tolerogenic APC

 

MHC class I molecules can be used by tumor cells: to modify the function of macrophages promoting their differentation into TAMs, to interfere with monocytes maturation and to expand MDSCs which, secreting Th2 cytokines, contribute to M2 polarization of macrophages.

Table 3

Summary of MHC class I molecules expressed/secreted on/by macrophages/tumor associated macrophages, their related ligands on immune cells and the function of their interaction

MHC (macrophage/TAMs)

RECEPTOR (immune cells)

FUNCTION

References

Membrane HLA-A-B-C

ILT2 on NK cells

- Negative regulation of INFgamma secretion

- Morel E. 2008 [133]

ILT2 on T cells

- Negative regulation of T cell function

- Dietrich J. 2001 [136]

Membrane HLA-A-B

KIR3DL1/2 on NK cells and effector T cells

- Inhibition of cytolitic function

- Anfossi N. 2004 [93]

- Long E.O. 2008 [94]

Membrane HLA-C

KIR2DL1/2/3 on NK cells and effector T cell

- Inhibition of cytolitic function

- Colonna M. 1993 [92]

- Falk C.S. 1995 [132]

Membrane HLA-G1

 

- HLA-G1 is acquired through trogocytosis by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells resulting their temporarily reversion to regulatory T cells

- LeMaoult J. 2007 [143]

Soluble HLA-G5

ILT2 and ILT4 on myeloid APC

- secretion of the cytokine TGF-beta1 that contributes to T cells peripheral tolerance

- McIntire R.H. 2004 [122]

- Turning down myeloid APC activation level

- Jones D.C. 2011 [79]

KIR2DL4 on CD56bright NK cells

- Secretion of pro-angiogenic cytokines and chemokines

- Rajagopalan S. 1999 [147]

- Rajagopalan S. 2012 [96]

CD8 on activated CD8+ T cells and CD8+ NK cells

- Fas/Fas ligand mediated cell death

- Contini P. 2003 [145]

- Puppo F. 2002 [146]

- LeMaoult J. 2004 [144]

Membrane HLA-E

CD94/NKG2A on NK cells and cytotoxic T cells

- Production of immune-suppressive cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-beta1) by NK cells

- Jinushi M. 2004 [148]

- Inhibition of cytolitic function

- Braud V.M. 1998 [46]

- Borrego F. 1998 [102]

MHC class I molecules can be used by TAMs to promote tumor angiogenesis and to dampen immune response against tumor cells both directly inhibiting NK and T cells function and indirectly inducing the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines.

MHC class II molecules

MHC class II gene expression is exclusively governed by the master regulatory factor CIITA (class II transactivator) [103]. The MHC class II expression in TAMs is repressed by the soluble member of the TNF receptor super family, decoy receptor 3 (DcR3), through the histone deacetylation of the CIITA promoter [104]. Chang et al. propose a more complex role of DcR3 as a modulator of macrophage differentiation and as a promoter of alternatively activated macrophage polarization up-regulating genes characteristically expressed in M2 macrophages, while down-regulated genes identify M1 macrophages. Coherently in DcR3 transgenic mice, the Th1 cell-response is attenuated and deviates towards the Th2 phenotype [105] and Th2 derived cytokines skew M2-like macrophage polarization.

DcR3 is a novel immune-suppressive factor up-regulated and secreted by tumour cells like lymphoma [106], glioma [107], lung and colon cancer [108], gastrointestinal tract cancer [109], and kidney cancer [110]. It is able to down-regulate the activation of DC [111] and macrophages [112], and to induce dendritic cell apoptosis [113].

DcR3 is able to promote tumour development in vivo through the regulation of TAM differentiation [114]. In fact, when DcR3 is regulated by the CD68 promoter in transgenic mice, the tumour grows faster and metastasis is more common than in wild type mice. Moreover, the tumour bulk has a more elevated infiltration of DcR3-overexpressing TAMs (characterized by up-regulation of arginase activity and down-regulation of MHC class II expression). Interestingly, treatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor can restore MHC class II expression in TAMs in vitro[112] and inhibit tumour growth in the transgenic model [114]. This may be of interest for future cancer immunotherapy strategies.

BAT3 is the product of a group of genes adjacent to the HLA-B locus, designated as B-associated transcripts (BATs). Kamper et al. [115] described that BAT3 regulates HLA class II expression and investigated the mode of BAT3 action on HLA class II genes. IFN-gamma, (key cytokine inducting Th1 response and M1 classical macrophage activation) modulates the expression of CIITA and strongly elevates BAT3 transcription in various tumour cell lines and in primary macrophages. Following IFN-gamma treatment, BAT3 chaperones CIITA and the complex translocates into the nuclear, where CIITA binds to the enhanceosome of HLA class II promoters enhancing HLA II gene transcription. Thus, BAT3 is critical to maintain HLA class II expression during the cell-mediated immune response. Coherently, in vitro exposure to INF-gamma could “re-educate” TAMs towards M1-polarized immune-stimulatory macrophages [116]. BAT3 has different intracellular roles as a chaperone: it monitors protein quality and refolding [117] and in complex with E1A-binding protein p300, BAT3 is required for the p53 acetylation in response to DNA damage resulting in DNA repair or in cell apoptosis [118]. BAT3 could be released as a BAT3 surface-positive exosome by accessory cells or tumour line cells in response to stress signals and engage NKp30, a receptor selectively expressed on NK [119, 120]. The result is the NK activation and killing of accessory or tumour cells and tumour rejection in a multiple myeloma xenograft model. It is likely that other immune-suppressive factors, such as the soluble BAT3 form (purified supernatant and derived from tumour cell culture in response to non-lethal heat shock) act in a suppressive manner inhibiting NK cell-dependent cytokine release. So far, the existence of a different isoform of BAT3 that could be released in an exosomal or soluble form with a NK activatory or inhibitory function cannot be ruled out. BAT3 could be considered a sensor for DNA instability or damage through its links to p53 function, able to alert the immune system via an activating receptor on NK cells. At the same time, BAT3 is a cross talk mediator between NK and accessory cells.

In consideration of the important intracellular and immunological functions, BAT3 could have a crucial role in tumour promotion. This is corroborated by a linkage disequilibrium study suggesting BAT3 as a strong candidate for lung cancer susceptibility [121].

Final reflections

As macrophages come into close association with tumour cells, they are exposed to high concentrations of soluble HLA-G. The binding of HLA-G5 to inhibitory receptors ILT2 and ILT4 stimulates macrophage production of TGF-beta1 [122] resulting in a further recruitment of monocytes from blood circulation and suppression of their cytotoxic function [123].

In ILT2 transgenic mice, HLA-G engagement of ILT2 receptors results in expansion of the population of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) with an enhanced suppressive activity. Moreover, ILT2 engagement results in increased production of IL-4 and IL-13, which are directly involved in the up-regulation of Arginase 1, a well-known marker of M2 macrophage polarization [124]. ILT2 ligation induces Th2 cytokine production by MDSC, which, in turn, influences M2 like-macrophage differentiation and stimulates the expansion of the immune-suppressive population. A recent paper shows for the first time that in vivo HLA-G skews the cytokine balance in favour of Th2 and stimulates expansion of MDSCs [125].

The interaction between HLA-G and monocytes due to ILT4 [126, 127] inhibits maturation of human monocyte-derived APCs resulting in a reduced expression of MHC class II antigens and co-stimulatory molecules through Stat3 activation [128]. A study using human monocyte-derived DCs and LILRB inhibitory ILT4-transgenic mice shows that HLA-G induces the development of tolerogenic APCs with arrest maturation/activation of myeloid DCs and the gene expression profile provides evidence that HLA-G induces tolerogenic DCs by disruption of the MHC class II presentation pathway [129].

Moreover, HLA-G1 and HLA-G5 interacting in trans with ILT2 and ILT4 on the membrane surface of macrophages induces up-regulation of the same inhibitory receptors in circulating/infiltrating macrophages even in the absence of an on-going immune response. The HLA-G-dependent up-regulation of HLA-G receptors might increase the activation threshold of the macrophages thus limiting the capabilities of the immune system to initiate a response against HLA-G expressing tissues. Furthermore, it induces the sensitivity of macrophages to direct inhibition not only by tissue-expressed HLA-G, but also by classical HLA class I molecules [130].

All three major subtypes of classical MHC class I molecules (HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C) can shape the microenvironment interacting with LILR receptors and with KIR receptors.

The classic MHC class I (HLA A and HLA B) can interact, with varying degrees of strength, with ILT2 and ILT4 on the meanwhile recruited myeloid cells in relation to the HLA I polymorphisms and HLA I class conformation negatively conditioning the level of myeloid activation. The Beta2-microglobulin-free forms of HLA-C molecules can engage ILT4 turning down the macrophages activation level as well as LILRA1 and LILRA3 on the same cells pushing the M2 alternative polarization. In this way, TAMs could enrol new immune cells and amplify the tumour-associated population.

TAM surface expression of HLA-C molecules, even in the absence of peptide, could be sufficient to inhibit HLA-C specific NK cells [92, 131] and non-MHC-restricted effector T cells [132] due to KIR2DL1/2/3.

Furthermore, HLA I class I molecules expressed on APCs negatively regulates NK-derived IFN-gamma secretion through the inhibitory receptor ILT2 [133]. Thus NK-derived IFN-gamma has a key role in polarization toward Th1 immune response [134] and it is critical for the induction of a tumour-specific cytotoxic T cell response [135].

Dietrich et al. show that ILT2 and TCR co-localize at the immunological synapse formed between T cells and antigen presenting cells expressing ligands for ILT2 and TCR on their surface. ILT2 on T cells could potentially function as an inhibitory co-receptor, first blocking binding of CD8 and second by bridging ILT2 into proximity with the TCR engaging the same peptide MHC-I [136]. However, there also exist other processes to inhibit T cell response: ILT2 could be efficiently transferred from monocytes to autologous T cells by trogocytosis and integrate within the plasma membrane of the acquirer T cells. Furthermore, the acquired receptors can access compatible signalling machinery within acquirer T cells and use it to signal and alter the functions of their new host cells [137].

The soluble HLA-G secreted or shed by TAMs mediates tolerance due to the induction of immune-suppressive T cells [138] through the engagement of the LILRB inhibitory receptors ILT2 and ILT4 on myeloid APCs [138] and the secretion of the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-beta1 by myelomonocytic cells [122]. TGFbeta1 is known to contribute to tolerance in peripheral lymphocytes [139].

HLA-G1 can be also acquired through membrane transfer or trogocytosis by CD4-positive T cells and CD8-positive T cells from APCs, like macrophages during the process of immunological synapse formation between TCR and MHC class II or I and or CD28 and B7 [140142]. HLA-G trogocytosis depends on the activation status of the acquirer cells and, once activated, T cells efficiently capture APC-produced molecules regardless of their antigen specificity. T cells reverse temporarily their function from effectors to regulatory cells inhibiting T-proliferative responses or exhibit an enhanced suppression activity. This “emergency” suppression mechanism might be temporary, due to the limited lifespan of borrowed HLA-G1 at the cell surface. However, it might also be sufficient to delay immune reactions and give time for real regulatory cells to differentiate and take over [143]. Furthermore, HLA G1 transfected APC lines function as immune-inhibitory cells capable of turning off alloproliferative responses of PBMCs as well as purified CD4+ T cells and of inducing a long term antigen-specific unresponsiveness, thus promoting a long lasting immune ignorance/tolerance [144].

HLA-G1 can be shed as soluble HLA-G by HLA G1 transfected APC lines in the microenvironment inducing the apoptosis of activated CD8+ T cells and NK [144], through CD8 ligation [145] or by enhancing the Fas ligand expression on cytotoxic effectors and triggering Fas/Fas ligand mediated cell death [146]. It is noteworthy that HLA-G in contrast to other MHC class I antigens, can link KIR2DL4 on a minority of CD56bright peripheral NK cells [147]. The engagement of this receptor results in the activation of NK cells, not for cytotoxicity, but for cytokine and chemokine secretion with a pro-angiogenic purpose [96].

Moreover, TAMs could express non-classical HLA class I molecules such as HLA-E. CD94/NKG2A heterodimers constitute NK cell inhibitory receptors that recognize the molecule HLA-E. Their interaction results in the production of the immune-suppressive cytokines IL-10 and TGF-beta by NK cells [148] as well as in the protection of HLA-E expressing cells by NK and CTL-dependent lysis [101, 102].

Conclusion

In conclusion, as summarized in Figures 1 and 2, both classical and non-classical MHC class I molecules expressed by tumour cells and TAMs might serve as important moderators of immune response attendees and the balance between the expression of MHC I molecules as free HC or as conformed proteins would determine the strength of such an immune response.
Figure 1

Tumour cells express classical and non classical MHC class I. The classic MHC class I, HLA A and HLA B, can interact, with varying degrees of strength, with ILT2 and ILT4 receptors on the myeloid cells in relation to the HLA polymorphisms and class conformation negatively conditioning the level of myeloid activation. The Beta2-microglobulin-free forms of HLA-C molecules are able to engage ILT4 turning down the macrophages activation level as well as LILRA1 and LILRA3 on the same cells pushing the M2 alternative polarization. The non classical MHC-I HLA G binds the inhibitory receptors ILT2 and ILT4 resulting in: macrophage production of TGF-beta1 resulting in a further recruitment of monocytes from blood circulation and suppression of their cytotoxic function; expansion of the population of myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) with an enhanced suppressive activity; development of tolerogenic APC.

Figure 2

TAMs express classical and non classical MHC class I. The classic MHC class I HLA A, HLA B and HLA C can interact with ILT2 and ILT4 receptors on the myeloid cells with a different strength in relation to the HLA polymorphisms and conformation negatively conditioning the level of myeloid activation. HLA A, B and C inhibits NK and T cell function through the interaction with the inhibitory Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor KIR3DL1/2 and KIR2DL1/2/3 respectively. The non classical MHC-I, HLA-G, can link KIR2DL4 on a minority of NK cells resulting in the cytokine and chemokine secretion with a pro-angiogenic purpose. The non classical HLA E recognizes CD94/NKG2A on NK cells triggering the production of the immune-suppressive cytokines IL-10 and TGF-beta by NK cells as well as protecting TAMs by NK and CTL dependent lysis.

Indeed this review casts light on inhibitory and activatory LILRs as novel potential trigger factors of the tolerogenic profile and of M2-like alternative polarization on TAMs in response to the interaction with the classical and non classical MHC class I.

Other interesting potential targets of treatment represented in Figure 3, are DcR3 and BAT3.
Figure 3

Regulation of MHC class II expression on TAMs. The tumour cells can secrete DcR3 that is shown to be a negative regulator of MHC class II expression and a promoter of M2-like macrophage polarization (TAM promotion). BAT3 is a critical intracellular factor for maintain MHC class expression on normal macrophages during the cell-mediated immune response. However TAMs are able to release it as a soluble immune-suppressive factor which inhibits NK cell-dependentcytokine secretion.

The tumour cells can release DcR3 in the microenvironment, which not only decreases the MHC class II expression on macrophages, but also alternatively promotes their M2 polarization.

BAT3 is a critical factor for maintaining MHC class II expression on macrophage cell surfaces when acting on intracellular sites. However, when cancer and accessory cells, like TAMs, secrete BAT3 in the tumour microenvironment, this looks like acting as an immune suppressor factor.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Antigen Presenting Cell

BAT3: 

HLA-B associated transcript-3

CD: 

Cluster of Differentiation

CMV: 

Cytomegalovirus

CTL: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes

CTLA: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen

CIITA: 

Class II transactivator

DC: 

Dendritic cell

DcR3: 

Decoy Receptor 3

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

EGF: 

Epithelial Growth Factor

ER: 

Endoplasmatic Reticulum

FGF: 

Fibroblastic [Fibroblast?] Growth Factor

HIV: 

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

HLA: 

Human Leucocyte Antigen

ICOS: 

Inducible T-cell Costimulator

IL: 

Interleukin

ILT: 

Immunoglobulin-Like Transcript 2

INF: 

Interferon

iNOS: 

inducible NO Synthase

KIR: 

Killer cell Immunoglobulin-like Receptor

LILR: 

Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-like Receptor

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccarhide

M: 

Macrophage

MHC: 

Major Histocompatibility Complex

NSLC: 

Non-Small Lung Cancer

mRNA: 

messenger RiboNucleoAcid

MSC: 

Mesenchymal Stem cell

MDSC: 

Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cell

NHL: 

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

NK: 

Natural Killer

Stat: 

Signal transducer and activator of transcription protein

TAP: 

Transporter associated with antigen processing

TAM: 

Tumour-Associated Macrophage

TCR: 

T-Cell Receptor

TGF: 

Tumour Growth Factor

TNFR: 

Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor

VEGF: 

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital
(2)
Institute of Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
(3)
Roche Pharma

References

  1. Biswas SK, Mantovani A: Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm. Nat Immunol. 2010, 11: 889-896. 10.1038/ni.1937.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas SK, Gangi L, Paul S, Schioppa T, Saccani A, Sironi M, Bottazzi B, Doni A, Vincenzo B, Pasqualini F: A distinct and unique transcriptional program expressed by tumor-associated macrophages (defective NF-kappaB and enhanced IRF-3/STAT1 activation). Blood. 2006, 107: 2112-2122. 10.1182/blood-2005-01-0428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mills CD, Kincaid K, Alt JM, Heilman MJ, Hill AM: M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 6166-6173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A: Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002, 23: 549-555. 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02302-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kurowska-Stolarska M, Stolarski B, Kewin P, Murphy G, Corrigan CJ, Ying S, Pitman N, Mirchandani A, Rana B, van Rooijen N: IL-33 amplifies the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages that contribute to airway inflammation. J Immunol. 2009, 183: 6469-6477. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Balkwill F, Charles KA, Mantovani A: Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 211-217. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.02.013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Coussens LM, Werb Z: Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002, 420: 860-867. 10.1038/nature01322.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bingle L, Brown NJ, Lewis CE: The role of tumour-associated macrophages in tumour progression: implications for new anticancer therapies. J Pathol. 2002, 196: 254-265. 10.1002/path.1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mantovani A, Sica A: Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010, 22: 231-237. 10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sica A, Mantovani A: Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Invest. 2012, 122: 787-795. 10.1172/JCI59643.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Movahedi K, Laoui D, Gysemans C, Baeten M, Stange G, Van den Bossche J, Mack M, Pipeleers D, In’t Veld P, De Baetselier P, Van Ginderachter JA: Different tumor microenvironments contain functionally distinct subsets of macrophages derived from Ly6C(high) monocytes. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 5728-5739. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4672.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bak SP, Alonso A, Turk MJ, Berwin B: Murine ovarian cancer vascular leukocytes require arginase-1 activity for T cell suppression. Mol Immunol. 2008, 46: 258-268. 10.1016/j.molimm.2008.08.266.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sica A, Saccani A, Bottazzi B, Polentarutti N, Vecchi A, van Damme J, Mantovani A: Autocrine production of IL-10 mediates defective IL-12 production and NF-kappa B activation in tumor-associated macrophages. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 762-767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Solinas G, Germano G, Mantovani A, Allavena P: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) as major players of the cancer-related inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2009, 86: 1065-1073. 10.1189/jlb.0609385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen J, Li G, Meng H, Fan Y, Song Y, Wang S, Zhu F, Guo C, Zhang L, Shi Y: Upregulation of B7-H1 expression is associated with macrophage infiltration in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012, 61: 101-108. 10.1007/s00262-011-1094-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cubillos-Ruiz JR, Martinez D, Scarlett UK, Rutkowski MR, Nesbeth YC, Camposeco-Jacobs AL, Conejo-Garcia JR: CD277 Is a negative co-stimulatory molecule universally expressed by ovarian cancer microenvironmental cells. Oncotarget. 2010, 1: 329-338.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Seliger B: Novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of HLA class I abnormalities. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012, 61: 249-254. 10.1007/s00262-011-1153-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schaefer MR, Williams M, Kulpa DA, Blakely PK, Yaffee AQ, Collins KL: A novel trafficking signal within the HLA-C cytoplasmic tail allows regulated expression upon differentiation of macrophages. J Immunol. 2008, 180: 7804-7817.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. McCutcheon JA, Gumperz J, Smith KD, Lutz CT, Parham P: Low HLA-C expression at cell surfaces correlates with increased turnover of heavy chain mRNA. J Exp Med. 1995, 181: 2085-2095. 10.1084/jem.181.6.2085.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Neisig A, Melief CJ, Neefjes J: Reduced cell surface expression of HLA-C molecules correlates with restricted peptide binding and stable TAP interaction. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 171-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Demaria S, Schwab R, Bushkin Y: The origin and fate of beta 2m-free MHC class I molecules induced on activated T cells. Cell Immunol. 1992, 142: 103-113. 10.1016/0008-8749(92)90272-Q.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Martayan A, Fraioli R, Giorda E, Setini A, Ciccarelli G, Delfino L, Ferrara GB, Giacomini P: Biosynthesis of HLA-C heavy chains in melanoma cells with multiple defects in the expression of HLA-A, -B, -C molecules. Br J Cancer. 1999, 80: 639-649. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690405.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Schnabl E, Stockinger H, Majdic O, Gaugitsch H, Lindley IJ, Maurer D, Hajek-Rosenmayr A, Knapp W: Activated human T lymphocytes express MHC class I heavy chains not associated with beta 2-microglobulin. J Exp Med. 1990, 171: 1431-1442. 10.1084/jem.171.5.1431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Boyson JE, Erskine R, Whitman MC, Chiu M, Lau JM, Koopman LA, Valter MM, Angelisova P, Horejsi V, Strominger JL: Disulfide bond-mediated dimerization of HLA-G on the cell surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 16180-16185. 10.1073/pnas.212643199.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonen-Gross T, Achdout H, Gazit R, Hanna J, Mizrahi S, Markel G, Goldman-Wohl D, Yagel S, Horejsi V, Levy O: Complexes of HLA-G protein on the cell surface are important for leukocyte Ig-like receptor-1 function. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 1343-1351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zilberman S, Schenowitz C, Agaugue S, Benoit F, Riteau B, Rouzier R, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N, Menier C: HLA-G1 and HLA-G5 active dimers are present in malignant cells and effusions: the influence of the tumor microenvironment. Eur J Immunol. 2012, 42: 1599-1608. 10.1002/eji.201141761.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cochran JR, Cameron TO, Stern LJ: The relationship of MHC-peptide binding and T cell activation probed using chemically defined MHC class II oligomers. Immunity. 2000, 12: 241-250. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80177-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Shiroishi M, Kohda D, Maenaka K: Preparation and crystallization of the disulfide-linked HLA-G dimer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006, 1764: 985-988. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.10.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shiroishi M, Kuroki K, Ose T, Rasubala L, Shiratori I, Arase H, Tsumoto K, Kumagai I, Kohda D, Maenaka K: Efficient leukocyte Ig-like receptor signaling and crystal structure of disulfide-linked HLA-G dimer. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 10439-10447. 10.1074/jbc.M512305200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Apps R, Gardner L, Sharkey AM, Holmes N, Moffett A: A homodimeric complex of HLA-G on normal trophoblast cells modulates antigen-presenting cells via LILRB1. Eur J Immunol. 2007, 37: 1924-1937. 10.1002/eji.200737089.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Howangyin KY, Loustau M, Wu J, Alegre E, Daouya M, Caumartin J, Sousa S, Horuzsko A, Carosella ED, Lemaoult J: Multimeric structures of HLA-G isoforms function through differential binding to LILRB receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012, 69: 4041-4049. 10.1007/s00018-012-1069-3.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pangault C, Le Friec G, Caulet-Maugendre S, Lena H, Amiot L, Guilloux V, Onno M, Fauchet R: Lung macrophages and dendritic cells express HLA-G molecules in pulmonary diseases. Hum Immunol. 2002, 63: 83-90. 10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00373-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ibrahim EC, Aractingi S, Allory Y, Borrini F, Dupuy A, Duvillard P, Carosella ED, Avril MF, Paul P: Analysis of HLA antigen expression in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions reveals that upregulation of HLA-G expression correlates with malignant transformation, high inflammatory infiltration and HLA-A1 genotype. Int J Cancer. 2004, 108: 243-250. 10.1002/ijc.11456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lefebvre S, Antoine M, Uzan S, McMaster M, Dausset J, Carosella ED, Paul P: Specific activation of the non-classical class I histocompatibility HLA-G antigen and expression of the ILT2 inhibitory receptor in human breast cancer. J Pathol. 2002, 196: 266-274. 10.1002/path.1039.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Morandi F, Levreri I, Bocca P, Galleni B, Raffaghello L, Ferrone S, Prigione I, Pistoia V: Human neuroblastoma cells trigger an immunosuppressive program in monocytes by stimulating soluble HLA-G release. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 6433-6441. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kren L, Muckova K, Lzicarova E, Sova M, Vybihal V, Svoboda T, Fadrus P, Smrcka M, Slaby O, Lakomy R: Production of immune-modulatory nonclassical molecules HLA-G and HLA-E by tumor infiltrating ameboid microglia/macrophages in glioblastomas: a role in innate immunity?. J Neuroimmunol. 2010, 220: 131-135. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.01.014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schutt P, Schutt B, Switala M, Bauer S, Stamatis G, Opalka B, Eberhardt W, Schuler M, Horn PA, Rebmann V: Prognostic relevance of soluble human leukocyte antigen-G and total human leukocyte antigen class I molecules in lung cancer patients. Hum Immunol. 2010, 71: 489-495. 10.1016/j.humimm.2010.02.015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ugurel S, Rebmann V, Ferrone S, Tilgen W, Grosse-Wilde H, Reinhold U: Soluble human leukocyte antigen–G serum level is elevated in melanoma patients and is further increased by interferon-alpha immunotherapy. Cancer. 2001, 92: 369-376. 10.1002/1097-0142(20010715)92:2<369::AID-CNCR1332>3.0.CO;2-U.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rebmann V, Regel J, Stolke D, Grosse-Wilde H: Secretion of sHLA-G molecules in malignancies. Semin Cancer Biol. 2003, 13: 371-377. 10.1016/S1044-579X(03)00028-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pistoia V, Morandi F, Wang X, Ferrone S: Soluble HLA-G: Are they clinically relevant?. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007, 17: 469-479. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2007.07.004.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mach P, Blecharz P, Basta P, Marianowski P, Skret-Magierlo J, Kojs Z, Grabiec M, Wicherek L: Differences in the soluble HLA-G blood serum concentration levels in patients with ovarian cancer and ovarian and deep endometriosis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010, 63: 387-395. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00806.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Leleu X, Le Friec G, Facon T, Amiot L, Fauchet R, Hennache B, Coiteux V, Yakoub-Agha I, Dubucquoi S, Avet-Loiseau H: Total soluble HLA class I and soluble HLA-G in multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11: 7297-7303. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0456.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Amiot L, Le Friec G, Sebti Y, Drenou B, Pangault C, Guilloux V, Leleu X, Bernard M, Facon T, Fauchet R: HLA-G and lymphoproliferative disorders. Semin Cancer Biol. 2003, 13: 379-385. 10.1016/S1044-579X(03)00029-4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Cao M, Yie SM, Liu J, Ye SR, Xia D, Gao E: Plasma soluble HLA-G is a potential biomarker for diagnosis of colorectal, gastric, esophageal and lung cancer. Tissue Antigens. 2011, 78: 120-128. 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2011.01716.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Morandi F, Scaruffi P, Gallo F, Stigliani S, Moretti S, Bonassi S, Gambini C, Mazzocco K, Fardin P, Haupt R: Bone marrow-infiltrating human neuroblastoma cells express high levels of calprotectin and HLA-G proteins. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e29922-10.1371/journal.pone.0029922.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Braud VM, Allan DS, Wilson D, McMichael AJ: TAP- and tapasin-dependent HLA-E surface expression correlates with the binding of an MHC class I leader peptide. Curr Biol. 1998, 8: 1-10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee N, Goodlett DR, Ishitani A, Marquardt H, Geraghty DE: HLA-E surface expression depends on binding of TAP-dependent peptides derived from certain HLA class I signal sequences. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 4951-4960.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Coupel S, Moreau A, Hamidou M, Horejsi V, Soulillou JP, Charreau B: Expression and release of soluble HLA-E is an immunoregulatory feature of endothelial cell activation. Blood. 2007, 109: 2806-2814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Tremante E, Rollo F, Diodoro MG, Ercolani C, Sperduti I, Lo Monaco E, Cosimelli M, Giacomini P: High expression of HLA-E in colorectal carcinoma is associated with a favorable prognosis. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 184-10.1186/1479-5876-9-184.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Silva TG, Crispim JC, Miranda FA, Hassumi MK, de Mello JM, Simoes RT, Souto F, Soares EG, Donadi EA, Soares CP: Expression of the nonclassical HLA-G and HLA-E molecules in laryngeal lesions as biomarkers of tumor invasiveness. Histol Histopathol. 2011, 26: 1487-1497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Gooden M, Lampen M, Jordanova ES, Leffers N, Trimbos JB, van der Burg SH, Nijman H, van Hall T: HLA-E expression by gynecological cancers restrains tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108: 10656-10661. 10.1073/pnas.1100354108.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. de Kruijf EM, Sajet A, van Nes JG, Natanov R, Putter H, Smit VT, Liefers GJ, van den Elsen PJ, van de Velde CJ, Kuppen PJ: HLA-E and HLA-G expression in classical HLA class I-negative tumors is of prognostic value for clinical outcome of early breast cancer patients. J Immunol. 2010, 185: 7452-7459. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Levy EM, Bianchini M, Von Euw EM, Barrio MM, Bravo AI, Furman D, Domenichini E, Macagno C, Pinsky V, Zucchini C: Human leukocyte antigen-E protein is overexpressed in primary human colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2008, 32: 633-641.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Derre L, Corvaisier M, Charreau B, Moreau A, Godefroy E, Moreau-Aubry A, Jotereau F, Gervois N: Expression and release of HLA-E by melanoma cells and melanocytes: potential impact on the response of cytotoxic effector cells. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 3100-3107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wischhusen J, Friese MA, Mittelbronn M, Meyermann R, Weller M: HLA-E protects glioma cells from NKG2D-mediated immune responses in vitro: implications for immune escape in vivo. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2005, 64: 523-528.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Marin R, Ruiz-Cabello F, Pedrinaci S, Mendez R, Jimenez P, Geraghty DE, Garrido F: Analysis of HLA-E expression in human tumors. Immunogenetics. 2003, 54: 767-775.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Palmisano GL, Contardi E, Morabito A, Gargaglione V, Ferrara GB, Pistillo MP: HLA-E surface expression is independent of the availability of HLA class I signal sequence-derived peptides in human tumor cell lines. Hum Immunol. 2005, 66: 1-12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Oliveira CC, van Veelen PA, Querido B, de Ru A, Sluijter M, Laban S, Drijfhout JW, van der Burg SH, Offringa R, van Hall T: The nonpolymorphic MHC Qa-1b mediates CD8+ T cell surveillance of antigen-processing defects. J Exp Med. 2010, 207: 207-221. 10.1084/jem.20091429.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Lo Monaco E, Tremante E, Cerboni C, Melucci E, Sibilio L, Zingoni A, Nicotra MR, Natali PG, Giacomini P: Human leukocyte antigen E contributes to protect tumor cells from lysis by natural killer cells. Neoplasia. 2011, 13: 822-830.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Allard M, Oger R, Vignard V, Percier JM, Fregni G, Perier A, Caignard A, Charreau B, Bernardeau K, Khammari A: Serum soluble HLA-E in melanoma: a new potential immune-related marker in cancer. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e21118-10.1371/journal.pone.0021118.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Mouillot G, Marcou C, Zidi I, Guillard C, Sangrouber D, Carosella ED, Moreau P: Hypoxia modulates HLA-G gene expression in tumor cells. Hum Immunol. 2007, 68: 277-285. 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.10.016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Lee N, Geraghty DE: HLA-F surface expression on B cell and monocyte cell lines is partially independent from tapasin and completely independent from TAP. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 5264-5271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee N, Ishitani A, Geraghty DE: HLA-F is a surface marker on activated lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40: 2308-2318. 10.1002/eji.201040348.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Lin A, Zhang X, Ruan YY, Wang Q, Zhou WJ, Yan WH: HLA-F expression is a prognostic factor in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2011, 74: 504-509. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.04.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang X, Lin A, Zhang JG, Bao WG, Xu DP, Ruan YY, Yan WH: Alteration of HLA-F and HLA I antigen expression in the tumor is associated with survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2013, 132: 82-89. 10.1002/ijc.27621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Noguchi K, Isogai M, Kuwada E, Noguchi A, Goto S, Egawa K: Detection of anti-HLA-F antibodies in sera from cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2004, 24: 3387-3392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Boyle LH, Gillingham AK, Munro S, Trowsdale J: Selective export of HLA-F by its cytoplasmic tail. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 6464-6472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Wainwright SD, Biro PA, Holmes CH: HLA-F is a predominantly empty, intracellular, TAP-associated MHC class Ib protein with a restricted expression pattern. J Immunol. 2000, 164: 319-328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Goodridge JP, Burian A, Lee N, Geraghty DE: HLA-F complex without peptide binds to MHC class I protein in the open conformer form. J Immunol. 2010, 184: 6199-6208. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000078.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Lepin EJM, Bastin JM, Allan DSJ, Roncador G, Braud VM, Mason DY, Merwe PA, McMichael AJ, Bell JI, Powis SH, O’Callaghan CA: Functional characterization of HLA-F and binding of HLA-F tetramers to ILT2 and ILT4 receptors. European J Immunol. 2000, 30: 3552-3561. 10.1002/1521-4141(200012)30:12<3552::AID-IMMU3552>3.0.CO;2-L.Google Scholar
  71. Sloane DE, Tedla N, Awoniyi M, MacGlashan DW, Borges L, Austen KF, Arm JP: Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors: novel innate receptors for human basophil activation and inhibition. Blood. 2004, 104: 2832-2839. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Brown D, Trowsdale J, Allen R: The LILR family: modulators of innate and adaptive immune pathways in health and disease. Tissue Antigens. 2004, 64: 215-225. 10.1111/j.0001-2815.2004.00290.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Lichterfeld M, Kavanagh DG, Williams KL, Moza B, Mui SK, Miura T, Sivamurthy R, Allgaier R, Pereyra F, Trocha A: A viral CTL escape mutation leading to immunoglobulin-like transcript 4-mediated functional inhibition of myelomonocytic cells. J Exp Med. 2007, 204: 2813-2824. 10.1084/jem.20061865.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Chapman TL, Heikeman AP, Bjorkman PJ: The inhibitory receptor LIR-1 uses a common binding interaction to recognize class I MHC molecules and the viral homolog UL18. Immunity. 1999, 11: 603-613. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80135-1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Willcox BE, Thomas LM, Bjorkman PJ: Crystal structure of HLA-A2 bound to LIR-1, a host and viral major histocompatibility complex receptor. Nat Immunol. 2003, 4: 913-919.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Shiroishi M, Kajikawa M, Kuroki K, Ose T, Kohda D, Maenaka K: Crystal structure of the human monocyte-activating receptor, “group 2” leukocyte Ig-like receptor A5 (LILRA5/LIR9/ILT11). J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 19536-19544. 10.1074/jbc.M603076200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Shiroishi M, Kuroki K, Rasubala L, Tsumoto K, Kumagai I, Kurimoto E, Kato K, Kohda D, Maenaka K: Structural basis for recognition of the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G by the leukocyte Ig-like receptor B2 (LILRB2/LIR2/ILT4/CD85d). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 16412-16417. 10.1073/pnas.0605228103.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Allen RL, Raine T, Haude A, Trowsdale J, Wilson MJ: Leukocyte receptor complex-encoded immunomodulatory receptors show differing specificity for alternative HLA-B27 structures. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 5543-5547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Jones DC, Kosmoliaptsis V, Apps R, Lapaque N, Smith I, Kono A, Chang C, Boyle LH, Taylor CJ, Trowsdale J, Allen RL: HLA class I allelic sequence and conformation regulate leukocyte Ig-like receptor binding. J Immunol. 2011, 186: 2990-2997. 10.4049/jimmunol.1003078.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Shiroishi M, Tsumoto K, Amano K, Shirakihara Y, Colonna M, Braud VM, Allan DS, Makadzange A, Rowland-Jones S, Willcox B: Human inhibitory receptors Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2) and ILT4 compete with CD8 for MHC class I binding and bind preferentially to HLA-G. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 8856-8861. 10.1073/pnas.1431057100.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Huang J, Goedert JJ, Sundberg EJ, Cung TD, Burke PS, Martin MP, Preiss L, Lifson J, Lichterfeld M, Carrington M, Yu XG: HLA-B*35-Px-mediated acceleration of HIV-1 infection by increased inhibitory immunoregulatory impulses. J Exp Med. 2009, 206: 2959-2966. 10.1084/jem.20091386.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Mamegano K, Kuroki K, Miyashita R, Kusaoi M, Kobayashi S, Matsuta K, Maenaka K, Colonna M, Ozaki S, Hashimoto H: Association of LILRA2 (ILT1, LIR7) splice site polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus and microscopic polyangiitis. Genes Immun. 2008, 9: 214-223. 10.1038/gene.2008.5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Thomas R, Matthias T, Witte T: Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptors as new players in autoimmunity. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010, 38: 159-162. 10.1007/s12016-009-8148-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Candore G, Lio D, Colonna Romano G, Caruso C: Pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases associated with 8.1 Ancestral haplotype: effect of multiple gene interactions. Autoimmun Rev. 2002, 1: 29-35. 10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00004-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Ryu M, Chen Y, Qi J, Liu J, Fan Z, Nam G, Shi Y, Cheng H, Gao GF: LILRA3 Binds both classical and non-classical HLA class I molecules but with reduced affinities compared to LILRB1/LILRB2: structural evidence. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19245-10.1371/journal.pone.0019245.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Nowak J, Kalinka-Warzocha E, Juszczynski P, Bilinski P, Mika-Witkowska R, Zajko M, Bienvenu J, Coiffier B, Salles G, Warzocha K: Association of human leukocyte antigen ancestral haplotype 8.1 With adverse outcome of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2007, 46: 500-507. 10.1002/gcc.20436.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Helgadottir H, Andersson E, Villabona L, Kanter L, van der Zanden H, Haasnoot GW, Seliger B, Bergfeldt K, Hansson J, Ragnarsson-Olding B: The common scandinavian human leucocyte antigen ancestral haplotype 62.1 As prognostic factor in patients with advanced malignant melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2009, 58: 1599-1608. 10.1007/s00262-009-0669-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Chen Y, Gao F, Chu F, Peng H, Zong L, Liu Y, Tien P, Gao GF: Crystal structure of myeloid cell activating receptor leukocyte Ig-like receptor A2 (LILRA2/ILT1/LIR-7) domain swapped dimer: molecular basis for its non-binding to MHC complexes. J Mol Biol. 2009, 386: 841-853. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.01.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Lee DJ, Sieling PA, Ochoa MT, Krutzik SR, Guo B, Hernandez M, Rea TH, Cheng G, Colonna M, Modlin RL: LILRA2 Activation inhibits dendritic cell differentiation and antigen presentation to T cells. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 8128-8136.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Arosa FA, Santos SG, Powis SJ: Open conformers: the hidden face of MHC-I molecules. Trends Immunol. 2007, 28: 115-123. 10.1016/j.it.2007.01.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Masuda A, Nakamura A, Maeda T, Sakamoto Y, Takai T: Cis binding between inhibitory receptors and MHC class I can regulate mast cell activation. J Exp Med. 2007, 204: 907-920. 10.1084/jem.20060631.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Colonna M, Borsellino G, Falco M, Ferrara GB, Strominger JL: HLA-C is the inhibitory ligand that determines dominant resistance to lysis by NK1- and NK2-specific natural killer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 12000-12004. 10.1073/pnas.90.24.12000.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Anfossi N, Doisne JM, Peyrat MA, Ugolini S, Bonnaud O, Bossy D, Pitard V, Merville P, Moreau JF, Delfraissy JF: Coordinated expression of Ig-like inhibitory MHC class I receptors and acquisition of cytotoxic function in human CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 7223-7229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Long EO: Negative signaling by inhibitory receptors: the NK cell paradigm. Immunol Rev. 2008, 224: 70-84. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00660.x.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Rajagopalan S, Bryceson YT, Kuppusamy SP, Geraghty DE, van der Meer A, Joosten I, Long EO: Activation of NK cells by an endocytosed receptor for soluble HLA-G. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4: e9-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040009.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Rajagopalan S, Long EO: KIR2DL4 (CD158d): an activation receptor for HLA-G. Front Immunol. 2012, 3: 258-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Miah SM, Hughes TL, Campbell KS: KIR2DL4 differentially signals downstream functions in human NK cells through distinct structural modules. J Immunol. 2008, 180: 2922-2932.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Li C, Houser BL, Nicotra ML, Strominger JL: HLA-G homodimer-induced cytokine secretion through HLA-G receptors on human decidual macrophages and natural killer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 5767-5772. 10.1073/pnas.0901173106.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Lanier LL: NK cell recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005, 23: 225-274. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Vales-Gomez M, Reyburn HT, Erskine RA, Lopez-Botet M, Strominger JL: Kinetics and peptide dependency of the binding of the inhibitory NK receptor CD94/NKG2-A and the activating receptor CD94/NKG2-C to HLA-E. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 4250-4260. 10.1093/emboj/18.15.4250.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Braud VM, Allan DS, O’Callaghan CA, Soderstrom K, D’Andrea A, Ogg GS, Lazetic S, Young NT, Bell JI, Phillips JH: HLA-E binds to natural killer cell receptors CD94/NKG2A, B and C. Nature. 1998, 391: 795-799. 10.1038/35869.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Borrego F, Ulbrecht M, Weiss EH, Coligan JE, Brooks AG: Recognition of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E complexed with HLA class I signal sequence-derived peptides by CD94/NKG2 confers protection from natural killer cell-mediated lysis. J Exp Med. 1998, 187: 813-818. 10.1084/jem.187.5.813.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Krawczyk M, Seguin-Estevez Q, Leimgruber E, Sperisen P, Schmid C, Bucher P, Reith W: Identification of CIITA regulated genetic module dedicated for antigen presentation. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4: e1000058-10.1371/journal.pgen.1000058.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Chang YC, Hsu TL, Lin HH, Chio CC, Chiu AW, Chen NJ, Lin CH, Hsieh SL: Modulation of macrophage differentiation and activation by decoy receptor 3. J Leukoc Biol. 2004, 75: 486-494.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Hsu TL, Wu YY, Chang YC, Yang CY, Lai MZ, Su WB, Hsieh SL: Attenuation of Th1 response in decoy receptor 3 transgenic mice. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 5135-5145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Ohshima K, Haraoka S, Sugihara M, Suzumiya J, Kawasaki C, Kanda M, Kikuchi M: Amplification and expression of a decoy receptor for fas ligand (DcR3) in virus (EBV or HTLV-I) associated lymphomas. Cancer Lett. 2000, 160: 89-97. 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00567-X.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Roth W, Isenmann S, Nakamura M, Platten M, Wick W, Kleihues P, Bahr M, Ohgaki H, Ashkenazi A, Weller M: Soluble decoy receptor 3 is expressed by malignant gliomas and suppresses CD95 ligand-induced apoptosis and chemotaxis. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 2759-2765.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. Pitti RM, Marsters SA, Lawrence DA, Roy M, Kischkel FC, Dowd P, Huang A, Donahue CJ, Sherwood SW, Baldwin DT: Genomic amplification of a decoy receptor for Fas ligand in lung and colon cancer. Nature. 1998, 396: 699-703. 10.1038/25387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Bai C, Connolly B, Metzker ML, Hilliard CA, Liu X, Sandig V, Soderman A, Galloway SM, Liu Q, Austin CP, Caskey CT: Overexpression of M68/DcR3 in human gastrointestinal tract tumors independent of gene amplification and its location in a four-gene cluster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000, 97: 1230-1235. 10.1073/pnas.97.3.1230.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Macher-Goeppinger S, Aulmann S, Wagener N, Funke B, Tagscherer KE, Haferkamp A, Hohenfellner M, Kim S, Autschbach F, Schirmacher P, Roth W: Decoy receptor 3 is a prognostic factor in renal cell cancer. Neoplasia. 2008, 10: 1049-1056.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Hsu TL, Chang YC, Chen SJ, Liu YJ, Chiu AW, Chio CC, Chen L, Hsieh SL: Modulation of dendritic cell differentiation and maturation by decoy receptor 3. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 4846-4853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Chang YC, Chen TC, Lee CT, Yang CY, Wang HW, Wang CC, Hsieh SL: Epigenetic control of MHC class II expression in tumor-associated macrophages by decoy receptor 3. Blood. 2008, 111: 5054-5063. 10.1182/blood-2007-12-130609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. You RI, Chang YC, Chen PM, Wang WS, Hsu TL, Yang CY, Lee CT, Hsieh SL: Apoptosis of dendritic cells induced by decoy receptor 3 (DcR3). Blood. 2008, 111: 1480-1488.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Tai SK, Chang HC, Lan KL, Lee CT, Yang CY, Chen NJ, Chou TY, Tarng DC, Hsieh SL: Decoy receptor 3 enhances tumor progression via induction of tumor-associated macrophages. J Immunol. 2012, 188: 2464-2471. 10.4049/jimmunol.1101101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. Kamper N, Franken S, Temme S, Koch S, Bieber T, Koch N: Gamma-interferon-regulated chaperone governs human lymphocyte antigen class II expression. FASEB J. 2012, 26: 104-116. 10.1096/fj.11-189670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. Duluc D, Corvaisier M, Blanchard S, Catala L, Descamps P, Gamelin E, Ponsoda S, Delneste Y, Hebbar M, Jeannin P: Interferon-gamma reverses the immunosuppressive and protumoral properties and prevents the generation of human tumor-associated macrophages. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 367-373. 10.1002/ijc.24401.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. Hessa T, Sharma A, Mariappan M, Eshleman HD, Gutierrez E, Hegde RS: Protein targeting and degradation are coupled for elimination of mislocalized proteins. Nature. 2011, 475: 394-397. 10.1038/nature10181.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. Sasaki T, Gan EC, Wakeham A, Kornbluth S, Mak TW, Okada H: HLA-B-associated transcript 3 (Bat3)/scythe is essential for p300-mediated acetylation of p53. Genes Dev. 2007, 21: 848-861. 10.1101/gad.1534107.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. Simhadri VR, Reiners KS, Hansen HP, Topolar D, Simhadri VL, Nohroudi K, Kufer TA, Engert A, PoggevonStrandmann E: Dendritic cells release HLA-B-associated transcript-3 positive exosomes to regulate natural killer function. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e3377-10.1371/journal.pone.0003377.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. Pogge von Strandmann E, Simhadri VR, von Tresckow B, Sasse S, Reiners KS, Hansen HP, Rothe A, Boll B, Simhadri VL, Borchmann P: Human leukocyte antigen-B-associated transcript 3 is released from tumor cells and engages the NKp30 receptor on natural killer cells. Immunity. 2007, 27: 965-974. 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.10.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. Wang Y, Broderick P, Webb E, Wu X, Vijayakrishnan J, Matakidou A, Qureshi M, Dong Q, Gu X, Chen WV, Spitz MR, Eisen T: Common 5p15.33 and 6p21.33 variants influence lung cancer risk. Nat Genet. 2008, 40: 1407-1409. 10.1038/ng.273.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. McIntire RH, Morales PJ, Petroff MG, Colonna M, Hunt JS: Recombinant HLA-G5 and -G6 drive U937 myelomonocytic cell production of TGF-beta1. J Leukoc Biol. 2004, 76: 1220-1228. 10.1189/jlb.0604337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Ashcroft GS: Bidirectional regulation of macrophage function by TGF-beta. Microbes Infect. 1999, 1: 1275-1282. 10.1016/S1286-4579(99)00257-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhang W, Liang S, Wu J, Horuzsko A: Human inhibitory receptor immunoglobulin-like transcript 2 amplifies CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells that promote long-term survival of allografts. Transplantation. 2008, 86: 1125-1134. 10.1097/TP.0b013e318186fccd.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. Agaugue S, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N: Role of HLA-G in tumor escape through expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and cytokinic balance in favor of Th2 versus Th1/Th17. Blood. 2011, 117: 7021-7031. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. Allan DS, Colonna M, Lanier LL, Churakova TD, Abrams JS, Ellis SA, McMichael AJ, Braud VM: Tetrameric complexes of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G bind to peripheral blood myelomonocytic cells. J Exp Med. 1999, 189: 1149-1156. 10.1084/jem.189.7.1149.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. Colonna M, Samaridis J, Cella M, Angman L, Allen RL, O’Callaghan CA, Dunbar R, Ogg GS, Cerundolo V, Rolink A: Human myelomonocytic cells express an inhibitory receptor for classical and nonclassical MHC class I molecules. J Immunol. 1998, 160: 3096-3100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. Liang S, Ristich V, Arase H, Dausset J, Carosella ED, Horuzsko A: Modulation of dendritic cell differentiation by HLA-G and ILT4 requires the IL-6–STAT3 signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105: 8357-8362. 10.1073/pnas.0803341105.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. Ristich V, Liang S, Zhang W, Wu J, Horuzsko A: Tolerization of dendritic cells by HLA-G. Eur J Immunol. 2005, 35: 1133-1142. 10.1002/eji.200425741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. LeMaoult J, Zafaranloo K, Le Danff C, Carosella ED: HLA-G up-regulates ILT2, ILT3, ILT4, and KIR2DL4 in antigen presenting cells, NK cells, and T cells. FASEB J. 2005, 19: 662-664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. Mandelboim O, Reyburn HT, Vales-Gomez M, Pazmany L, Colonna M, Borsellino G, Strominger JL: Protection from lysis by natural killer cells of group 1 and 2 specificity is mediated by residue 80 in human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen C alleles and also occurs with empty major histocompatibility complex molecules. J Exp Med. 1996, 184: 913-922. 10.1084/jem.184.3.913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. Falk CS, Steinle A, Schendel DJ: Expression of HLA-C molecules confers target cell resistance to some non-major histocompatibility complex-restricted T cells in a manner analogous to allospecific natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1995, 182: 1005-1018. 10.1084/jem.182.4.1005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. Morel E, Bellon T: HLA class I molecules regulate IFN-gamma production induced in NK cells by target cells, viral products, or immature dendritic cells through the inhibitory receptor ILT2/CD85j. J Immunol. 2008, 181: 2368-2381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. Martin-Fontecha A, Thomsen LL, Brett S, Gerard C, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F: Induced recruitment of NK cells to lymph nodes provides IFN-gamma for T(H)1 priming. Nat Immunol. 2004, 5: 1260-1265. 10.1038/ni1138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. Kelly JM, Darcy PK, Markby JL, Godfrey DI, Takeda K, Yagita H, Smyth MJ: Induction of tumor-specific T cell memory by NK cell-mediated tumor rejection. Nat Immunol. 2002, 3: 83-90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. Dietrich J, Cella M, Colonna M: Ig-like transcript 2 (ILT2)/leukocyte Ig-like receptor 1 (LIR1) inhibits TCR signaling and actin cytoskeleton reorganization. J Immunol. 2001, 166: 2514-2521.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  137. HoWangYin KY, Caumartin J, Favier B, Daouya M, Yaghi L, Carosella ED, LeMaoult J: Proper regrafting of Ig-like transcript 2 after trogocytosis allows a functional cell-cell transfer of sensitivity. J Immunol. 2011, 186: 2210-2218. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. Le Rond S, Azema C, Krawice-Radanne I, Durrbach A, Guettier C, Carosella ED, Rouas-Freiss N: Evidence to support the role of HLA-G5 in allograft acceptance through induction of immunosuppressive/ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 3266-3276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. Nakamura K, Kitani A, Fuss I, Pedersen A, Harada N, Nawata H, Strober W: TGF-beta 1 plays an important role in the mechanism of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell activity in both humans and mice. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 834-842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. Huang JF, Yang Y, Sepulveda H, Shi W, Hwang I, Peterson PA, Jackson MR, Sprent J, Cai Z: TCR-mediated internalization of peptide-MHC complexes acquired by T cells. Science. 1999, 286: 952-954. 10.1126/science.286.5441.952.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. Cox JH, McMichael AJ, Screaton GR, Xu XN: CTLs target Th cells that acquire bystander MHC class I-peptide complex from APCs. J Immunol. 2007, 179: 830-836.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. Hwang I, Huang JF, Kishimoto H, Brunmark A, Peterson PA, Jackson MR, Surh CD, Cai Z, Sprent J: T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells. J Exp Med. 2000, 191: 1137-1148. 10.1084/jem.191.7.1137.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. LeMaoult J, Caumartin J, Daouya M, Favier B, Le Rond S, Gonzalez A, Carosella ED: Immune regulation by pretenders: cell-to-cell transfers of HLA-G make effector T cells act as regulatory cells. Blood. 2007, 109: 2040-2048. 10.1182/blood-2006-05-024547.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. LeMaoult J, Krawice-Radanne I, Dausset J, Carosella ED: HLA-G1-expressing antigen-presenting cells induce immunosuppressive CD4+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004, 101: 7064-7069. 10.1073/pnas.0401922101.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. Contini P, Ghio M, Poggi A, Filaci G, Indiveri F, Ferrone S, Puppo F: Soluble HLA-A,-B,-C and -G molecules induce apoptosis in T and NK CD8+ cells and inhibit cytotoxic T cell activity through CD8 ligation. Eur J Immunol. 2003, 33: 125-134. 10.1002/immu.200390015.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Puppo F, Contini P, Ghio M, Indiveri F: Soluble HLA class I molecules/CD8 ligation trigger apoptosis of CD8+ cells by Fas/Fas-ligand interaction. ScientificWorldJournal. 2002, 2: 421-423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. Rajagopalan S, Long EO: A human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-G-specific receptor expressed on all natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1999, 189: 1093-1100. 10.1084/jem.189.7.1093.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Jinushi M, Takehara T, Tatsumi T, Kanto T, Miyagi T, Suzuki T, Kanazawa Y, Hiramatsu N, Hayashi N: Negative regulation of NK cell activities by inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A leads to altered NK cell-induced modulation of dendritic cell functions in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 6072-6081.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Marchesi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement