CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an important role in maintaining immunological tolerance to self and foreign antigens. T cell receptors (TCR) reflect the composition and function of T cells. It is not universally agreed that there is a relationship between CD4+CD25+ Treg frequency and the severity of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). The repertoire of TCR beta chain variable (TCRBV) regions of peripheral Tregs in ACLF patients is not well understood.
Methods
Human PBMCs were separated and sorted into CD4+CD25+ Treg subsets using density gradient centrifugation and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS). The CD4+CD25high Treg frequency in peripheral blood of ACLF and chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients was measured by flow cytometry. The molecular profiles of TCRBV CDR3 were determined using gene melting spectral pattern (GMSP) analysis. TCRBV gene families were cloned and sequenced when the GMSP profiles showed a single-peak.
Results
CD4+CD25high Treg prevalence in peripheral blood of ACLF patients is increased significantly compared to healthy donors (HDs) (P < 0.01) and CHB patients (P < 0.01). The prevalence of CD4+CD25high Tregs in ACLF or CHB patients is positively correlated with HBV DNA load. The TCRBV11, BV13.1, BV18, BV20 are the most prevalent TCRBV in CD4+CD25+ Tregs in ACLF and CHB patients. In addition, the CDR3 motifs were relatively conserved in these four TCRBV gene families.
Conclusions
The CD4+CD25high Tregs prevalence in peripheral blood is indicative of disease severity in ACLF or CHB patients. The relatively conserved TCRBV20 CDR3 motif “TGTGHSPLH” and TCRBV11 CDR3 motif “VYNEQ” may be used in helping diagnosis and treat patients with ACLF.
Background
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is responsible for chronic infection. Despite a reduction in new HBV infections since the introduction of vaccination in the early 1990s, there are approximately 350 million chronic HBV carriers worldwide, and HBV remains an important cause of liver disease in developed countries[1]. HBV infection can lead to a spectrum of liver diseases, including chronic asymptomatic HBV carrier (AsC), chronic hepatitis B (CHB), liver cirrhosis (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)[2, 3]. HBV-related ACLF is an acute decompensation of chronic liver disease due to precipitating events such as upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding, ischemia, or additional superimposed liver injury due to alcohol, hepatotoxic drugs, surgical procedures, or reactivation of viral hepatitis[4]. ACLF has a relatively high mortality and liver transplantation serves as the most promising treatment for ACLF[5–7]. However, a serious lack of livers limits the utility of liver transplantation. Although the role of T-cell immunity in ACLF pathogenesis is receiving more attention, it is not well understood.
Recent studies have shed light on CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) that actively maintain immune tolerance to both self and non-self-antigens by suppressing an aggressive T-cell response[8]. Studies indicate that an increase of circulating CD4+ CD25+ Tregs are associated with persistent HBV infection, due to down-regulated HBV-specific T cells[9, 10]. The occurrence of ACLF often represents a complicated state of host immune dysregulation, in which exacerbated innate immune responses and aberrant adaptive immune responses may play an important role in mediating hepatic inflammation and liver necrosis. However, it is still controversial as to how the peripheral frequency of CD4+CD25+ Treg changes in patients with HBV-related ACLF[11, 12].
The T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire can reflect the function, status, and composition of T cell populations in vivo. Characterization of the TCR repertoire of CD4+CD25+ Treg subsets from hepatitis B patients may clarify its role in ACLF pathogenesis. Furthermore, understanding TCR expression during disease progression, including for infectious diseases, may aid diagnosis and treatment[13]. In this study, we examined the frequency of peripheral CD4+CD25+ Tregs from HBV-infected ACLF patients, and the TCRBV CDR3 repertoire in Tregs from ALCF and CHB patients. A relationship between Treg frequency and HBV DNA load in ACLF or CHB patients was observed.
Materials and methods
Subjects
Patients with HBV-related ACLF (n = 25) and patients with CHB (n = 30) were admitted to the Department of Infectious Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, between February and June 2011. Healthy donors (n = 30) were selected as controls and matched for sex ratio and age with the patient groups. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Zhejiang University medical ethics committee approved all procedures involving human subjects.
The diagnostic standards for patients with ACLF is set by the Consensus Recommendation on ACLF issued by the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)[14], and the Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines for Liver Failure[15]. ACLF patients were categorized as follows: (a) a history of chronic hepatitis or well-compensated cirrhosis with the presence of serum HBsAg ≥ 6 months; (b) recent development of severe jaundice with total bilirubin ≥ 171 μmol/L plus increasing international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5 or decreasing prothrombin activity (PTA) ≤ 40%; and (c) recent development of coagulopathy, obvious ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome[16]. Patients with CHB fulfilled the definitions described in detail elsewhere[11]. Patient characteristics at the time of the study are shown in Table 1. Patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis D virus (HDV), or hepatitis E virus (HEV), were excluded. Patients treated with anti-viral or immunomodulatory drugs within the previous 6 months, or suffering from a complication of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were excluded too. Peripheral venous blood samples were obtained after liver disease was diagnosed. The anti-viral treatment was applied together with conventional medical treatment, after the blood samples were obtained. Among the ACLF patients, 14 cases treated with entecavir (Bristol-Myers Squibb) 0.5 mg/d, and the remaining 11 cases with lamivudine (GlaxoSmithKline) 100 mg/d.
Table 1
Characteristics of HBV patients and healthy controls
ACLF n = 25
CHB n = 30
HCs n = 30
Age (years)
43 ± 10
38 ± 7
36 ± 7
Gender (M/F)
16/9
21/9
18/12
ALT (IU/L)
327 ± 215
223 ± 124
18 ± 9
TBiL (μmol/L)
410.0 ± 150.2
133.2 ± 51.2
12.3 ± 3.7
HBV DNA(lgcps/mL)
5.3 ± 1.2
5.7 ± 1.6
ND
HBeAg (positive/negative)
12/13
18/12
ND
HBV genotype
15B, 10C
18B, 12C
ND
These values expressed as mean ± SD, unless otherwise indicated.
Normal values: ALT, ≤ 40 IU/L; TBiL, ≤ 21 μmol/L.
ACLF, acute-on-chronic liver failure; ALT, alanine transaminase; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCs, healthy controls; TBiL, Total bilirubin; ND, no detected.
Biochemical and serological markers and quantification of HBV DNA
Biochemical tests of liver function examined serum alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino transferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBiL), and creatinine (CREA) using an automated biochemical analyzer (AEROSET, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA). Prothrombin activity (PTA) and international normalized ratio (INR) were derived from prothrombin time (PT) and determined using an automated coagulation analyzer (Sysmex CA-500 Series, Siemens, Deerfield, IL, USA). Qualitative assessment of HBV markers (HBsAg/anti-HBs, HBeAg/anti-HBe, anti-HBc) was determined using commercial enzyme immunoassay kits (LJ biology, Shanghai, China). Serum HBV DNA load was quantified and HBV genotypes were determined using commercial kits as described previously[17, 18], with a minimal detection standard of 500 copies/mL.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMCs) isolation and flow cytometric analysis
PBMCs were isolated from 10 ml fresh EDTAK2 anti-coagulant-treated blood using Ficoll-Paque (StemCell Technologies Inc., Vancouver, Canada) density gradient separation. To determine the frequency of the CD4+CD25+ Treg population, 100 μL whole blood was incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) to T cell surface markers CD4 (FITC-conjugated anti-CD4 antibody) and CD25 (PE-conjugated anti-CD25 antibody) at 4°Cfor 30 min. Red blood cells were lysed, stained, and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Stained cells were washed twice with sheath fluid, and the percentage of CD4+CD25+ Tregs in the total CD4+ lymphocyte population was analyzed using flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Fc500 MPL, Coulter, Fullerton, USA), and isotype-matched control antibodies.
Preparation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and flow cytometric analysis
CD4+CD25+ Tregs were isolated from fresh PBMCs. Briefly, CD4+ T cell subsets were negatively selected using a CD4+ T cell biotin-antibody cocktail and anti-biotin microbeads. CD4+CD25+ T cells were further isolated from CD4+ T cells using anti-CD25 antibody-coated magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of CD4+CD25+ Tregs was ≥ 90% (data not shown), as determined by CD4/CD25 flow cytometric analysis using surface staining. For intracellular staining, the purified of CD4+CD25+ Tregs were treated with Fix & Perm Reagent (Coulter) after labelling with surface antibodies, and then incubated with anti-Foxp3 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), and the following steps as described above. The data were analyzed using MXP software (Coulter). The CD4+CD25+ Tregs were followed total RNA extracted, when the percentages of intracellular FoxP3-positive T cells in CD4+ T-cell subsets from ACLF or CHB patients were about 80%. In addition, the average frequency of CD127low expressed on these CD4+CD25+ Tregs is approximately 80% (data no shown).
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from CD4+CD25+ Tregs using TRIzol® (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) or RNeasy® Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop® ND-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, Delaware, USA), and integrity was checked electrophoretically (28S and 18S). Total RNA was immediately reverse transcribed to cDNA using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (MBI, Fermentas, EU) per manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, ~1-5 μg total RNA was reverse transcribed with OligodT18 in a 20 μL reaction volume and stored at −20°C.
GMSP assay of TCRBV in CD4+CD25+ tregs to identify skewed TCRBV repertoire
The GoTaq® qPCR Master Mix (with Rox™ dye) was used as PCR kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). A master mix of 20 μl for each of the 28 reactions containing 0.5 μM reverse primer TCRBC, and 50 ~ 150 ng template cDNA was prepared. For family specific TCRBV amplification, the corresponding forward primer (TCRBV1 ~ 24) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 μM. The real time PCR reaction parameters were as follows: 2 min at 95°Cto activate the GoTaq enzyme, followed by 45 cycles at 95°Cfor 15 s, 56.5°Cfor 20 s, and 72°Cfor 25 s with a final extension at 72°Cfor 8 min. The melting curve for 24 TCRBV gene families was determined by plotting the first negative derivative of the decrease in fluorescence signal as a function of temperature (−dF/dT) versus temperature (Tm), generating gene melting spectral patterns (GMSPs) as previously reported[19].
A skewed clonal expansion was determined using the GMSP profile of each TCRBV family using Opticon Monitor 3.0 and the MJ Opticon 2 DNA engine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). GMSP profiles were in one of two categories: 1) “Oligoclonal expansion”, or 2) “Monoclonal”, as defined previously[20].
Cloning and sequencing
If a TCRBV gene family demonstrated a monoclonal GMSP profile (single peak), the sample was selected for cloning and sequencing to determine the degree of homogeneity within the CDR3 region. Briefly, PCR products were reamplified using GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and touchdown PCR. The parameters were: pre-incubation at 95°Cfor 2 min, 95°Cfor 30 s, 60°Cfor 40 s, 72°Cfor 45 s, for 8 cycles with annealing temperature decreasing 0.5°Cper cycle, and 95°Cfor 45 s, 56°Cfor 45 s, 72°Cfor 50 s, for 27 cycles. The cycling was followed by a terminal elongation step at 72°Cfor 8 min.
Purified PCR products were ligated into pGEMT-T using the pGEM-3Z Cloning Kit (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cloning details have been described previously[21]. The plasmid DNA was sequenced using an ABI3730 DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA). The resulting sequences were compared against a standard TCRBV gene database (http://www.imgt.org).
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). TCRBV families were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test or Mann–Whitney nonparametric U test. Differences in data between two families were examined using a χ2-test or Student’s t-test. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to determine differences in CD4+CD25+ Treg frequency and other parameters (serum ALT, TBiL, and CREA levels), with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
ACLF patients with increased frequency of CD4+CD25+ Tregs
The CD4+CD25high subset has been counted to represent the CD4+CD25+ Treg frequency in HBV and HIV-infected patients[22, 23]. In the study, we thus determined the frequency of CD4+CD25+ Treg in total CD4+ by measuring CD4+CD25high (fluorescence intensity of CD25 >50) population. Our results indicate that patients with HBV related-ACLF had a significantly higher frequency of peripheral CD4+CD25high Tregs (mean, 6.24%) than CHB patients (mean, 4.16%, P < 0.01) and healthy controls (mean, 2.09%, P < 0.01). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the circulating proportion of CD4+CD25high Tregs between CHB patients and healthy controls (P < 0.01) (Figure 1A). A representative flow plot demonstrating the frequency CD4+CD25+ Tregs in peripheral blood from ACLF patients, CHB patients and healthy controls is shown in Figure 1B.
Figure 1
Percentages of CD4+CD25+Tregs within total CD4+T population in peripheral blood in ACLF, CHB patients, and healthy controls. The CD4+CD25+ Tregs are gated from a mononuclear cell subset of peripheral whole blood. (A) Frequencies of CD4+CD25high Tregs in peripheral blood from three groups (ACLF, CHB patients, and healthy controls, HC). Data are expressed as box plots, in which the middle of the black solid line is the median frequency of Tregs. Vertical lines represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. The p values of multiple comparisons were calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis H nonparametric test. (B) Representative scatter plots are obtained by flow cytometry using antibodies against CD4 and CD25. CD4+CD25+ Tregs were separated into CD4+CD25high, CD4+CD25low subsets, defined by the fluorescence intensity of CD25 (> 50) obtained using isotypic control antibody.
Relationship between Treg frequency and HBV DNA load
There was a positive correlation between CD4+CD25+ Treg frequency in peripheral blood from ACLF patients and serum HBV DNA load (r = 0.432, P = 0.031) (Figure 2A). A similar positive correlation was also observed in CHB patients (r = 0.378, P = 0.039) (Figure 2B). Furthermore, in ACLF patients and CHB patients, there was no correlation between circulating CD4+CD25+ Tregs and serum ALT, TBiL, and CREA levels (data not shown).
Figure 2
Correlation between CD4+CD25+Treg frequency and common logarithm (log10) of HBV DNA load in patients with ACLF or CHB.
Tregs have a skewed TCRBV repertoire
We compared the Tregs TCRBV CDR3 profiles from ACLF and CHB patients to those of healthy controls. ACLF and CHB patients contained a greater number of skewed-clonally derived TCRBV families relative to controls. Although ACLF patients displayed a lower average ratio of skewed TCRBV families than CHB patients, it was not significantly different (P > 0.05) (Table 2). The number of single and biased-peaks for 24 TCRBV families detected in CD4+CD25+ Tregs differed between ACLF and CHB patients. Four TCRBV gene families (BV11, BV13.1, BV18, BV20) were more prevalent than other TCRBV members (Table 2). A representative GMSP profile of a monoclonal TCRBV expressed in CD4+CD25+ Tregs from ACLF and CHB patients is shown in Figure 3.
Table 2
Frequency of skewed TCRBV families in CD4+CD25+Treg from patients with ACLF, CHB, and HCsa
TCRBV families
ACLF Incidence (%)b
CHB Incidence (%)b
HCs Incidence (%)b
1
3
5
0
2
4
3
1
3
3
5
1
4
5
6
2
5.1
6 (26.1)
3
2
5.2
2
6
1
6
2
5
2
7
5
6
1
8
3
3
2
9
3
2
3
10
5
3
1
11
9 (39.1)
9 (33.3)
2
12
6 (26.1)
6
1
13.1
7 (30.1)
8 (29.6)
2
13.2
3
6
2
14
3
2
1
15
4
8 (29.6)
1
16
3
5
2
17
5
7 (25.9)
1
18
8 (34.8)
9 (33.3)
2
19
2
2
0
20
10 (43.5)
11 (40.7)
2
21
1
5
1
22
3
7 (25.9)
1
23
5
5
0
24
3
5
2
Total no. of skewed Vβ (average ratio for a case)
113 (4.91) c, d
142 (5.26) c, d
36 (2.12) c
No. of patients examined with normal pattern e (ratio,%)
2 (8.0) f
3 (10.0) f
13 (43.3) f
No. of patients examined
25
30
30
aThe number of TCRBV gene families showing skewed-clone expansion (oligoclonal or monoclonal) is summarized in patients with ALCF, CHB and HCs.
bThe number of samples showing a skewed-clone expansion in total detected samples (percentages of each TCRBV skewed-clone expansion). Samples with normal GMSP are excluded in the percentage calculation.
cThe average skewed expansion rate of TCRBV gene families was higher in CD4+CD25+ Treg from patients with ACLF or CHB than that of HC group (P < 0.01 by χ2 test).
dThere was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05 by χ2 test). Samples with normal GMSP are excluded in the average ratio calculation
eNormal pattern (GMSP) means that there is no monoclonal or oligoclonal pattern in any TCRBV families in a patient.
fThe incidence of the normal GMSP was significantly lower in CD4+CD25+ Treg from patients with ACLF or CHB than that of HC group (P < 0.01 by χ2 test).
Figure 3
Representative GMSP with a single-peak (monoclonal expansion) of TCRBV families in CD4+CD25+Treg from ACLF and CHB patients. The TCRBV gene families in the top graphs corresponding to P43 (BV20), P70 (BV20), P51 (BV18), P46 (BV13.1), P25 (BV12), and P47 (BV11). The TCRBVs shown in the bottom graphs correspond to P20 (BV22), P17 (BV20), P57 (BV18), P45 (BV17), P17 (BV15), and P44 (BV13.1). The correspond amino acid sequences are shown in Table 3. The melting temperature is on the x-axis of each plot. The negative first derivative of the decrease in fluorescence as a function of temperature (−dF/dT) is shown on the y-axis.
TCRBV CDR3 amino acid motifs in Tregs
The total number of TCRBV gene families with single peak shape (GMSP) in ACLF or CHB patients is 35 and 41 respectively. The TCRBV CDR3 gene families were cloned, sequenced, and translated to corresponding amino acid sequences. Representative amino acid sequences of TCRBV CDR3 from ACLF or CHB patients are shown in Table 3. We found that several different ACLF patients exhibited monoclonal expansion of relatively conserved TCRBV CDR3, such as BV20 (TGTGHSPLH with BJ1.6), BV18 (RTGDTEA with BJ1.1), BV13.1 (EVRTAFYEQ with BJ2.7) and BV11 (VYNEQ with BJ2.1). CHB patients also expressed relatively conserved TCRBV CDR3, such as BV20 (TGTGHSPLH with BJ1.6), BV18 (DDQETQ with BJ2.5), BV13.1 (YSGQGIDGY with BJ1.2) and BV11 (SSGGVDTQ with BJ2.3). Four TCRBV gene families (BV11, BV13.1, BV18, BV20) were more prevalent than the other TCRBV families.
Table 3
Representative amino acid sequences of monoclonal TCRBV families in CD4+CD25+Tregs from patients with ACLF or CHB
Patientsa
Vbeta
CDR3
BJ
Ratio
43 (ACLF)
BV20
SGFYLCAWS
TGTGHSPLH
FGNGTRLTVTED
1.6
17/21
70 (ACLF)
BV20
SGFYLCAWS
TGTGHSPLH
FGNGTRLTVTED
1.6
19/23
67 (ACLF)
BV20
SGFYLCAWS
TGTGHSPLH
FGNGTRLTVTED
1.6
13/22
6 (ACLF)
BV20
SGFYLCAWR
ISHTGEL
LFGEGSRLTVLED
2.2
16/22
16 (ACLF)
BV20
SGFYLCAWS
GGSNQPQ
HFGDGTRLSILEDL
1.5
13/20
51 (ACLF)
BV18
SAAYFCASS
RTGDTEA
FFGQGTRLTVVED
1.1
16/21
46 (ACLF)
BV13.1
SVYFCASS
EVRTAFYEQ
YFGPGTRLTVTED
2.7
14/21
25 (ACLF)
BV12
SVYFCAIS
DGQVVEQ
YFGPGTRLTVTED
2.7
15/22
47 (ACLF)
BV11
SQYLCATG
VYNEQ
FFGPGTRLTVLED
2.1
20/20
51 (ACLF)
BV11
SQYLCATG
VYNEQ
FFGPGTRLTVLED
2.1
20/20
10 (ACLF)
BV5.1
SALYLCASS
LEQLTRANKQ
NFGPGTRLTVLED
2.3
17/23
20 (CHB)
BV22
SAMYFCASK
GSREGLVVNEQ
FFGPGTRLTVLE
2.1
18/22
17 (CHB)
BV20
SGFYLCAWS
TGTGHSPL
HFGNGTRLTVTED
1.6
21/23
57 (CHB)
BV18
SAAYFCASS
DDQETQ
YFGPGTRLLVLED
2.5
21/21
45 (CHB)
BV17
TAFYLCASS
IVNGGQPQ
HFGDGTRLSILED
1.5
21/22
17 (CHB)
BV15
TALYFCATS
DPASGRTNEQ
FFGPGTRLTVLED
2.1
15/22
44 (CHB)
BV13.1
SVYFCASS
YSGQGIDGY
TFGSGTRLTVVED
1.2
16/22
3 (CHB)
BV11
SQYLCATT
SSGGVDTQ
YFGPGTRLTVLED
2.3
21/23
When the GMSP profile of a TCRBV family displayed a single peak, the corresponding PCR products re-amplified and the CDR3 were sequenced after cloning. The amino acid sequences of the max rate of TCRBV families are shown. aThe clinical types of patients were indicated in brackets.
Discussion
CD4+CD25+ Tregs are important immune regulatory cells. Their primary role is regulating the immune response through immune suppression by inhibiting the immune system response to both self and foreign antigens. Treg cells inhibit excessive pathological damage by inhibiting HBV-specific CD8 + T cell activation, which may aid persistent virus infection[8]. In addition to inhibiting CD4 +/CD8 + T cells in vivo, Treg cells also inhibit dendritic cell (DCs) activation and cytokine secretion, preventing an excessive inflammatory response. We show here that increased prevalence of CD4+CD25+ Tregs in peripheral blood is associated with HBV replication and disease severity in HBV patients.
Several studies have tried to characterize the role of peripheral CD4+CD25+ Tregs in chronic HBV infection. However, the relationship between Tregs and ACLF pathogenesis is not well established, and in fact, the conclusions from two earlier studies were not consistent[11, 12]. Our data are very similar to the findings observed by Xu et al. Those results support the notion that in HBV infected ACLF patients, up-regulation of CD4+CD25+ Tregs might play a critical role in suppressing immune responses, contributing to chronic HBV infection. In addition, the prevalence of circulating CD4+CD25+ Tregs is increased in CHB patients as described by Peng et al.[9]. Conversely, Wang et al. found a substantial decrease in peripheral CD4+CD25+CD127low Tregs in ACLF patients. The discrepancies between these studies may be attributed largely to differences in techniques, reagents, and blood samples, as well as the molecular markers used for identifying Tregs.
HBV replication may play an important role in precipitating liver failure in patients with chronic HBV infection. Our results demonstrate a positive correlation between peripheral CD4+CD25+ Tregs and HBV DNA load in patients with HBV-related ACLF or CHB. Interestingly, adefovir treatment induced reduction of HBV DNA, a decrease in Tregs, and an increase in HBV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell proliferation and IFN-gamma production[24]. These observations support the notion that an increase in CD4+CD25+ Treg may reduce HBV specific immune responses, leading to ongoing HBV replication and chronic infection.
T cells are quite heterogeneous due to the large repertoire of TCRs, which can serve as a “molecular fingerprint” of T cell populations[25]. Each T cell clone expresses a unique TCR that recognizes antigen-derived peptide bound to a major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The CDR3 region is the key determinant of T cell antigen specificity and mediates T cell diversity[26, 27]. Therefore, analysis of the CDR3 profile reflects changes in the T cell population stimulated by a specific antigen[28, 29]. In the current study, we found four TCRBV gene families (BV11, BV13.1, BV18, BV20) to be more prevalent than other members in CD4+CD25+ Tregs from ACLF and CHB patients, which suggests these four families may be indicative of patients with chronic HBV infection. Moreover, TCRBV5.1 is present at a higher frequency in ACLF patients than in CHB patients, which may indicate the TCRBV5.1 family may have a potential role in ACLF pathogenesis, although, this underlying mechanism requires further exploration.
Immune suppression plays an important role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Inhibiting Treg proliferation and differentiation, blocking regulatory pathways, blocking immune suppression, and increasing epitope-specific CTL immune responses, are all potential new treatment strategies for hepatitis B[30, 31]. At present, blocking T cell function using monoclonal antibodies against the TCR[32], and TCR gene transfer have been developed as a reliable method to generate large numbers of T cells ex vivo with given antigen-specificity and functional avidity. These results provide promise for clinical application[33–37].
In the current study, we found that motifs of monoclonal populations expressing TCRBV11, BV13.1, BV18, and BV20 in CD4+CD25+ Tregs from ACLF patients are different from that in CHB patients. It is not clear, however, if or how the emergence of the TCRBV families influence the course of ACLF. In a follow-up study, we observed an interesting phenomenon, wherein the TCRBV in CD4+CD25+ Tregs from ACLF patients expressed TCRBV20 with the CDR3 sequence “TGTGHSPLH”. Their short-term response to treatment was better than that for ACLF patients with the TCRBV CDR3 “ISHTGEL” or “GGSNQPQ” motifs. Moreover, we found the CDR3 “TGTGHSPLH” motif expressed only in the CHB patients whose condition was not as serious. This suggests that “TGTGHSPLH” may be a short-term prognostic biomarker for ACLF with anti-viral treatment, although this requires further validation. The TCRBV11 family prefers “VYNEQ” as a CDR3 motif in ACLF patients, but expressed “SSGGVDTQ” in CHB patients. This is partly consistent with our previous report showing “AGEL” is the preferred motif in CHB patients whose short-term outcomes are better than CHB patients expressing the “VYNEQ” motif[20].
Therefore, conserved TCRBV gene families may help produce antibody specific to TCRBV motifs, inhibiting the corresponding CD4+CD25+ Tregs and aiding hepatitis B treatment. Moreover, production of antigen-specific T cells using TCR gene transfer is a promising idea for the treatment of liver disease[38], with reports noting that CD8(+)CD45RC(low) Tregs are a potential cell-based treatment[39]. Examining CD4+CD25+ Treg TCR diversity may further our understanding of peripheral tolerance mechanisms and the role peripheral Tregs, and how this applies to hepatitis B patients[40].
In the current study, because the volume of blood samples was limited, the FoxP3 mRNA expression in CD4+CD25+ Tregs was not confirmed. Another hurdle is that CD4+CD25high Tregs were not isolated using a cell sorter, and directly used for GMSP assay. But Peng et al. described that CD4+CD25+ Tregs could represent CD4+CD25high Tregs, when the CD4+ T cells including high FoxP3-positive T cells content determined by flow cytometry analysis[9].
Conclusions
Patients with HBV-related ACLF exhibited an increase in circulating CD4+CD25+ Tregs, which was correlated with HBV-related liver failure. An increase in peripheral Treg has been associated with more severe liver disease in hepatitis B patients. The relatively conserved TCRBV20 CDR3 “TGTGHSPLH” and TCRBV11 CDR3 “VYNEQ” motif could be used in predicting the health status of patients with ACLF or CHB, and may help in the development of transduction TCR gene therapy for ACLF patients.
This work was supported by the Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of S&T Innovation (2009R50041), PR China, and the National High-technology R&D Program of China (2009CB522406), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University
(2)
Department of Geriatric, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University
References
Lanini S, Puro V, Lauria FN, Fusco FM, Nisii C, Ippolito G: Patient to patient transmission of hepatitis B virus: a systematic review of reports on outbreaks between 1992 and 2007. BMC Med. 2009, 7: 15-10.1186/1741-7015-7-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Wiersma ST, McMahon B, Pawlotsky JM, Thio CL, Thursz M, Lim SG, Ocama P, Esmat G, Maimuna M, Bell D, Vitoria M, Eramova I, Lavanchy D, Dusheiko G: Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in resource-constrained settings: expert panel consensus. Liver Int. 2011, 31: 755-761. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2010.02373.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Xu Z, Ren X, Liu Y, Li X, Bai S, Zhong Y, Wang L, Mao P, Wang H, Xin S, Wong VW, Chan HL, Zoulim F, Xu D: Association of hepatitis B virus mutations in basal core promoter and precore regions with severity of liver disease: an investigation of 793 Chinese patients with mild and severe chronic hepatitis B and acute-on-chronic liver failure. J Gastroenterol. 2011, 46: 391-400. 10.1007/s00535-010-0315-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jalan R, Williams R: Acute-on-chronic liver failure: pathophysiological basis of therapeutic options. Blood Purif. 2002, 20: 252-261. 10.1159/000047017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Jung O, Asbe-Vollkopf A, Betz C, Caspary W, Geiger H, Faust D: Long-term therapy of acute chronic liver failure to successful transplantation with an extracorporeal liver support system. Z Gastroenterol. 2007, 45: 21-24. 10.1055/s-2006-927385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen Z, Wen T, Zeng Y, Wang L, Lu JJ, Gong S, Tan H, Feng P, Li B, Zhao J, Wang W, Xu M, Yang J, Wu H, Yan L: A single institution experience with living donor liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic hepatitis b liver failure. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011, 58: 1286-1290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bahirwani R, Shaked O, Bewtra M, Forde K, Reddy KR: Acute-on-chronic liver failure before liver transplantation: impact on posttransplant outcomes. Transplantation. 2011, 92: 952-957. 10.1097/TP.0b013e31822e6eda.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Belkaid Y, Rouse BT: Natural regulatory T cells in infectious disease. Nat Immunol. 2005, 6: 353-360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Peng G, Li S, Wu W, Sun Z, Chen Y, Chen Z: Circulating CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells correlate with chronic hepatitis B infection. Immunology. 2008, 123: 57-65. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02691.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Nan XP, Zhang Y, Yu HT, Li Y, Sun RL, Wang JP, Bai XF: Circulating CD4 + CD25high regulatory T cells and expression of PD-1 and BTLA on CD4+ T cells in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Viral Immunol. 2010, 23: 63-70. 10.1089/vim.2009.0061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Xu D, Fu J, Jin L, Zhang H, Zhou C, Zou Z, Zhao JM, Zhang B, Shi M, Ding X, Tang Z, Fu YX, Wang FS: Circulating and liver resident CD4 + CD25+ regulatory T cells actively influence the antiviral immune response and disease progression in patients with hepatitis B. J Immunol. 2006, 177: 739-747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Wang LW, Chen H, Gong ZJ: High mobility group box-1 protein inhibits regulatory T cell immune activity in liver failure in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2010, 9: 499-507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Miles JJ, Douek DC, Price DA: Bias in the alphabeta T-cell repertoire: implications for disease pathogenesis and vaccination. Immunol Cell Biol. 2011, 89: 375-387. 10.1038/icb.2010.139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sarin SK, Kumar A, Almeida JA, Chawla YK, Fan ST, Garg H, de Silva HJ, Hamid SS, Jalan R, Komolmit P, Lau GK, Liu Q, Madan K, Mohamed R, Ning Q, Rahman S, Rastogi A, Riordan SM, Sakhuja P, Samuel D, Shah S, Sharma BC, Sharma P, Takikawa Y, Thapa BR, Wai CT, Yuen MF: Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the study of the liver (APASL). Hepatol Int. 2009, 3: 269-282. 10.1007/s12072-008-9106-x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Liver Failure and Artificial Liver Group Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases Chinese Medical Association; Severe Liver Diseases and Artificial Liver Group Chinese Society of Hepatology Chinese Medical Association: Diagnostic and treatment guidelines for liver failure. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2006, 14: 643-646.Google Scholar
Wasmuth HE, Kunz D, Yagmur E, Timmer-Stranghoner A, Vidacek D, Siewert E, Bach J, Geier A, Purucker EA, Gressner AM, Matern S, Lammert F: Patients with acute on chronic liver failure display “sepsis-like” immune paralysis. J Hepatol. 2005, 42: 195-201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Chen Y, Li X, Ye B, Yang X, Wu W, Chen B, Pan X, Cao H, Li L: Effect of telbivudine therapy on the cellular immune response in chronic hepatitis B. Antiviral Res. 2011, 91: 23-31. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pan XB, Wei L, Han JC, Gao Y: Cellular chromosome DNA interferes with fluorescence quantitative real-time PCR detection of HBV DNA in culture medium. J Med Virol. 2008, 80: 47-52. 10.1002/jmv.21042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yang JZ, Li MW, Wang JG, Lu HF, Yao XS, He JQ, Li LJ: Rapid detection of clonal expansion of T-cell receptor-beta gene in patients with HBV using the real-time PCR with DNA melting curve analysis. Hepatol Res. 2010, 40: 407-414. 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2009.00600.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Yang J, He J, Lu H, Wei L, Li S, Wang B, Diao H, Li L: Molecular features of the complementarity determining region 3 motif of the T cell population and subsets in the blood of patients with chronic severe hepatitis B. J Transl Med. 2011, 9: 210-10.1186/1479-5876-9-210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Sing GK, Li D, Chen X, Macnaughton T, Lichanska AM, Butterworth L, Ladhams A, Cooksley G: A molecular comparison of T lymphocyte populations infiltrating the liver and circulating in the blood of patients with chronic hepatitis B: evidence for antigen-driven selection of a public complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) motif. Hepatology. 2001, 33: 1288-1298. 10.1053/jhep.2001.24026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stoop JN, van der Molen RG, Baan CC, van der Laan LJ, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG, Janssen HL: Regulatory T cells contribute to the impaired immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology. 2005, 41: 771-778. 10.1002/hep.20649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Tsunemi S, Iwasaki T, Imado T, Higasa S, Kakishita E, Shirasaka T, Sano H: Relationship of CD4 + CD25+ regulatory T cells to immune status in HIV-infected patients. AIDS. 2005, 19: 879-886. 10.1097/01.aids.0000171401.23243.56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Stoop JN, van der Molen RG, Kuipers EJ, Kusters JG, Janssen HL: Inhibition of viral replication reduces regulatory T cells and enhances the antiviral immune response in chronic hepatitis B. Virology. 2007, 361: 141-148. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.11.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Castillo H, Barros-Nunez P: Detection of clonal immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene recombination in hematological malignancies: monitoring minimal residual disease. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets. 2009, 9: 124-135. 10.2174/187152909788488627.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Miqueu P, Guillet M, Degauque N, Dore JC, Soulillou JP, Brouard S: Statistical analysis of CDR3 length distributions for the assessment of T and B cell repertoire biases. Mol Immunol. 2007, 44: 1057-1064. 10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Okajima M, Wada T, Nishida M, Yokoyama T, Nakayama Y, Hashida Y, Shibata F, Tone Y, Ishizaki A, Shimizu M, Saito T, Ohta K, Toma T, Yachie A: Analysis of T cell receptor Vbeta diversity in peripheral CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes in patients with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Clin Exp Immunol. 2009, 155: 166-172. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03842.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Du JW, Gu JY, Liu J, Cen XN, Zhang Y, Ou Y, Chu B, Zhu P: TCR spectratyping revealed T lymphocytes associated with graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007, 48: 1618-1627. 10.1080/10428190701474357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Zaccone P, Cooke A: Harnessing CD8(+) regulatory T cells: therapy for type 1 diabetes?. Immunity. 2010, 32: 504-506. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sharabi A, Mozes E: Harnessing regulatory T cells for the therapy of lupus and other autoimmune diseases. Immunotherapy. 2009, 1: 385-401. 10.2217/imt.09.2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Davis JL, Theoret MR, Zheng Z, Lamers CH, Rosenberg SA, Morgan RA: Development of human anti-murine T-cell receptor antibodies in both responding and nonresponding patients enrolled in TCR gene therapy trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 5852-5861. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Kerkar SP, Sanchez-Perez L, Yang S, Borman ZA, Muranski P, Ji Y, Chinnasamy D, Kaiser AD, Hinrichs CS, Klebanoff CA, Scott CD, Gattinoni L, Morgan RA, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP: Genetic engineering of murine CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells for preclinical adoptive immunotherapy studies. J Immunother. 2011, 34: 343-352. 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3182187600.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Bendle GM, Haanen JB, Schumacher TN: Preclinical development of T cell receptor gene therapy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009, 21: 209-214. 10.1016/j.coi.2009.02.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Wang QJ, Hanada K, Feldman SA, Zhao Y, Inozume T, Yang JC: Development of a genetically-modified novel T-cell receptor for adoptive cell transfer against renal cell carcinoma. J Immunol Methods. 2011, 366: 43-51. 10.1016/j.jim.2011.01.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Frankel TL, Burns WR, Peng PD, Yu Z, Chinnasamy D, Wargo JA, Zheng Z, Restifo NP, Rosenberg SA, Morgan RA: Both CD4 and CD8 T cells mediate equally effective in vivo tumor treatment when engineered with a highly avid TCR targeting tyrosinase. J Immunol. 2010, 184: 5988-5998. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Royal RE, Topalian SL, Kammula US, Restifo NP, Zheng Z, Nahvi A, de Vries CR, Rogers-Freezer LJ, Mavroukakis SA, Rosenberg SA: Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science. 2006, 314: 126-129. 10.1126/science.1129003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Gehring AJ, Xue SA, Ho ZZ, Teoh D, Ruedl C, Chia A, Koh S, Lim SG, Maini MK, Stauss H, Bertoletti A: Engineering virus-specific T cells that target HBV infected hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. J Hepatol. 2011, 55: 103-110. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.10.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Picarda E, Anegon I, Guillonneau C: T-cell receptor specificity of CD8(+) tregs in allotransplantation. Immunotherapy. 2011, 3: 35-37. 10.2217/imt.11.37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Adeegbe D, Matsutani T, Yang J, Altman NH, Malek TR: CD4(+) CD25(+) Foxp3(+) T regulatory cells with limited TCR diversity in control of autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2010, 184: 56-66. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902379.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
