Skip to main content

Resurgence of syphilis: focusing on emerging clinical strategies and preclinical models

Abstract

Syphilis, a sexually transmitted disease (STD) caused by Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), has had a worldwide resurgence in recent years and remains a public health threat. As such, there has been a great deal of research into clinical strategies for the disease, including diagnostic biomarkers and possible strategies for treatment and prevention. Although serological testing remains the predominant laboratory diagnostic method for syphilis, it is worth noting that investigations pertaining to the DNA of T. pallidum, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), chemokines, and metabolites in peripheral blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and other bodily fluids have the potential to offer novel perspectives on the diagnosis of syphilis. In addition, the global spread of antibiotic resistance, such as macrolides and tetracyclines, has posed significant challenges for the treatment of syphilis. Fortunately, there is still no evidence of penicillin resistance. Hence, penicillin is the recommended course of treatment for syphilis, whereas doxycycline, tetracycline, ceftriaxone, and amoxicillin are viable alternative options. In recent years, efforts to discover a vaccine for syphilis have been reignited with better knowledge of the repertoire of T. pallidum outer membrane proteins (OMPs), which are the most probable syphilis vaccine candidates. However, research on therapeutic interventions and vaccine development for human subjects is limited due to practical and ethical considerations. Thus, the preclinical model is ideal for conducting research, and it plays an important role in clinical transformation. Different preclinical models have recently emerged, such as in vitro culture and mouse models, which will lay a solid foundation for clinical treatment and prevention of syphilis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the most recent syphilis tactics, including detection, drug resistance treatments, vaccine development, and preclinical models in clinical practice.

Introduction

Syphilis is a chronic multisystem disease caused by Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum), one of the oldest known diseases, with a resurgence in recent years. Since 2000, the prevalence of syphilis has increased significantly in developed countries. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported in 2017 that syphilis cases in the United States increased by up to 76% between 2013 and 2017 [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that there are about 6.3 million new cases of syphilis worldwide every year, and it is estimated that there will be 7 million new cases of syphilis in 2020 [1, 2]. Syphilis is known as “the great imitator” due to its variable clinical manifestations that can mimic other diseases. It not only causes chronic systemic multiple organ damage in adults, but also vertically spreads to the fetus through the placenta during pregnancy, leading to premature birth, miscarriage, stillbirth, and birth defects. The impact on sex with men (MSM), people living with HIV (PLWH), sex workers (SWs), and pregnant women is particularly serious [3]. Penicillin is still the preferred drug for the treatment of syphilis, but when it is not accessible (such as in allergic populations or countries where penicillin is not readily available), there are relatively few options for treating all phases of the disease. Although there have been numerous attempts to use alternative drugs in recent years, it is worth noting that resistance to alternative drugs in T. pallidum has now been found in several regions [1]. Therefore, we should pay attention to the resistance of T. pallidum in the screening of alternative drugs. Furthermore, it is worth noting that there is currently no clinical vaccine available for the prevention of syphilis. However, more study and knowledge of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) might reveal novel insights that could revolutionize the development of a syphilis vaccine.

Despite evidence-based curative treatment options with penicillin, it remains a public health threat with increasing prevalence over recent years. Research on therapeutic interventions and vaccine development for human subjects is limited due to practical and ethical considerations. Therefore, preclinical models are crucial for investigating syphilis pathogenesis and developing novel therapies and vaccines. Besides, clinical transformation is also greatly aided by preclinical models. Implementation of forward translation—the process of implementing basic research discoveries into practice—and reverse translation—the process of elucidating the mechanistic basis of clinical observations—practices could greatly enhance our ability to develop effective anti-syphilis strategies. The aim of this review is to integrate the extensive literature to gain new insights and optimize current protocols for syphilis diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, as well as preclinical models.

Diagnosis

Serologic diagnosis

Currently, serological testing is the most mainstream laboratory diagnosis method for syphilis, mainly including the nontreponema test [rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test or venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) test] and the treponema test [Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA), various enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), chemiluminescence immunoassays (CIAs) and immunoblots, or rapid treponemal, et al.] [4]. Non-treponemal rapid plasma regain (RPR) flocculation tests are used to assess disease activity, assess response to treatment, and diagnose reinfection or recurrence. However, non-treponemal testing is for antibodies against lipoidal antigens, which are non-specific and usually not detected until a few weeks after infection. Treponema testing is more sensitive to early infection, and treponema serology is often used to detect treponema IgG (CLIA) and TPPA) to investigate possible cases of syphilis. Treponema tests target treponema pallidum-specific proteins, and many current commercial tests mainly use T. pallidum antigens (Tp15, Tp17, and Tp47) to detect IgM, IgG, or both. Here we summarize a large number of serological diagnostic candidate antigen studies [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15] (Table 1). Besides, the response intensity and rate of antibody production to these candidate antigens may also serve as sensitive indicators for the early diagnosis of syphilis. Despite the fact that these antigens are useful in the serological diagnosis of syphilis, treponeme-specific diagnostics such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are unable to evaluate syphilis therapy. Notably, Zhao discovered a highly significant positive association between the difference in A450 nm values for Tp0971 and the RPR titre change before and after syphilis treatment, indicating the potential of Tp0971 in the assessment of the effectiveness of syphilis therapies [9].

Table 1 Studies on candidate antigens of T. pallidum for serological diagnosis

Diagnosis by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)

In particular, NAAT has gained popularity for diagnosing infectious disorders caused by organisms that are difficult to culture. Researchers have been increasingly turning to NAAT as a means of detecting T. pallidum DNA in a wide range of sample types and disease states. Figure 1 graphically depicts the use of the nucleic acid amplification test in the diagnosis of syphilis. NAAT mainly aims at three target genes of T. pallidum, including the DNA polymerase I gene (polA), Tp47(tp0574), and bmp [16,17,18]; besides, 16S rRNA, tmpC, and tmpA were involved [19, 20]. Some studies showed that five types of NAAT, including routine PCR, real-time PCR (qPCR), reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR), nested PCR (nPCR), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays could be used to diagnose syphilis [17, 21,22,23,24,25]. In parallel, a recent study developed assays that pair PCR pre-amplification of the tp0574 gene of T. pallidum with CRISPR-LwCas13a, which outperformed tp0574 real-time PCR and rabbit-infectivity testing in terms of sensitivity and specificity [26]. In addition to blood and CSF, scholars have begun to detect T. pallidum DNA in other types of specimens, such as saliva, atrial fluid (aqueous humor), urine, semen, oropharynx, and anorectum, during early syphilis stages as a proxy for transmissibility [25, 27,28,29,30]. It's important to note that nPCR has far greater specificity and sensitivity than traditional PCR, notably in seronegative individuals and those with discrepant serology [24]. In a recent study, researchers found that T. pallidum DNA could be identified in saliva at all syphilis stages, with greater detection rates in saliva than in plasma, with the exception of primary syphilis [27]. Saliva samples may be a sensitive diagnostic fluid for syphilis, and they also have the benefits of being convenient and non-invasive, making them a viable approach for monitoring T. pallidum DNA elimination as an indication of therapy efficacy [27]. Additionally, T. pallidum DNA in urine was detectable in individuals throughout the spectrum of syphilis severity, and loads were larger in urine sediment than in urine supernatant. Patients with both primary and secondary syphilis have a high chance of detection. Obtaining a large quantity of T. pallidum DNA from urine may be a good idea due to the sample’s abundance and the ease with which it may be collected [25].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagnosis by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Molecular assays with nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) are used for direct detection to improve diagnostic sensitivity. Types of NAAT include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nested PCR, quantitative PCR, reverse transcriptase PCR, and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Notably, nPCR has a higher specificity and sensitivity than conventional PCR, especially in seronegative and serologically different individuals. In addition to blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), scholars have begun to explore other types of specimens, such as tissue or lesional smears, saliva, urine, aqueous humor, semen, amniotic fluid, and placental tissue. NAAT mainly aims at three target genes of T.pallidum, including the DNA polymerase I gene (polA), Tp47(tp0574), and bmp; besides, 16S rRNA, tmpC, subsurface lipoprotein 4D (4D), and tmpA were involved. T. pallidum can be diagnosed in part by targeting its DNA, but mRNA or non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) can also be targeted for complementary diagnosis

T. pallidum can be diagnosed in part by targeting its DNA, but mRNA or non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) can also be targeted for complementary diagnosis. Infection with T. pallidum may induce tissue damage, and microRNAs have a regulatory function in the immune response to T. pallidum infection. Recent research has demonstrated that T. pallidum infection increases the expression of miR-101-3p, inhibiting the TLR2 signaling pathway and resulting in decreased cytokine production [31]. Furthermore, miRNA expression differed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at various phases of T. pallidum infection [32]. As a result, the microRNAs in PBMCs might singly or jointly be potential diagnostic biomarkers at different stages of syphilis [31,32,33,34,35]. MiR-195-5p, miR-101-3p, and miR-223-3p alone or in combination can specifically distinguish syphilis patients from non-syphilis patients [32, 33]; miR-101-3p can be used as a diagnostic biomarker for patients with primary syphilis [31]. Additional research has indicated that miR-142-3p is a promising PBMC-based specific biomarker for secondary syphilis [34]. In addition, miR-338-5p and miR-101-3p can be used as diagnostic indicators of serofast state [31, 35]. Interestingly, miR-195-5p, miR-223-3p, and miR-589-3p showed significant differences in the diagnosis of serofast and serologically cured states [32]. MicroRNAs may be employed as a non-invasive biomarker of T. pallidum infection to aid in the diagnosis of the disease. However, further research is required before clinical applications may be realized.

The most often used non-treponemal test for neurosyphilis is CSF-VDRL. A positive CSF-VDRL test is regarded neurosyphilis diagnostic, while a negative result does not rule out the diagnosis. Numerous studies have shown that high concentrations of CXCL13 in the CSF may be possible biomarkers of neurosyphilis, especially for asymptomatic neurosyphilis, adding to the growing list of diagnostic molecular markers for syphilis. CXCL13 has other interesting applications, including treatment monitoring in neurosyphilis [36]. Elevated concentrations of CXCL8, CXCL10, and IL-10 may also be potential biological markers of neurosyphilis, especially asymptomatic neurosyphilis [37,38,39]. Meanwhile, the increased levels of CXCL9, CXCL7, CCL24, IL-17, IL-26, and migration inhibitory factor (MIF) of macrophages in the CSF of neurosyphilis patients suggested their role as promising differential diagnostic tools for neurosyphilis [37, 40,41,42]. Although these cytokine changes are still in their infancy for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis, their importance cannot be ignored due to the lack of ideal neurosyphilis biomarkers.

Histological diagnosis

For almost a decade, modern mass spectrometry has been used in the biological study of human metabolites and proteins (proteomics and metabolomics, respectively). However, the use of mass spectrometry to diagnose syphilis is still in its infancy. High-sensitivity proteomics, which relies on mass spectrometry (MS) to identify proteins, has, however, been a major driving force. In recent years, an MS-based approach has been successfully applied in numerous clinical microbial protein screening studies. In the past decades, researchers have also used pre-MS analysis based on gel technology to identify T. pallidum protein peptides. In 2016, McGill first studied the purified T. pallidum proteome using matrix-assisted laser desorption /ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF/TOF) and electrospray ionization (ESI-LTQ-Orbitrap), which identified 557 unique T. pallidum proteins [43]. Subsequently, two different MS-based proteomics approaches were used to analyze T. pallidum proteins in urine samples from syphilis patients, yielding the identification of 26 peptides corresponding to four T. pallidum proteins [44]. Interestingly, identification of T. pallidum-specific proteins in sera of syphilis patients based on liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) also revealed high expression levels and low homology of Tp0369 [45], strongly suggesting that Tp0369 is a promising candidate peptide target for syphilis early diagnosis, so as to overcome the nonspecific problem of antigen detection [44, 45].

Global metabolomics analysis can provide substantial information on possible diagnostic biomarkers for pathogens. The metabolite profile of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from neurosyphilis patients determined by untargeted metabolomic analysis showed significant differences in d-mannose, l-gulono-gamma-lactone, S-methyl-5ʹ-thioadenosine, hypoxanthine, and N-acetyl-l-tyrosine, with the largest difference in N-acetyl-l-tyrosine by the student’s t test [46]. In addition, LC–MS revealed that the levels of bilirubin, l-histidine, prostaglandin E2, alpha-kamlolenic acid, butyryl-l-carnitine, and palmitoyl-l-carnitine were significantly reduced in the CSF of neurosyphilis patients, suggesting them to be novel potential biomarkers of neurosyphilis [47]. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of neurosyphilis patient serum revealed that several metabolites, including trimethylamine N-oxide, l-arginine, lysoPC (18:0), betaine, and acetylcarnitine, were significantly higher in syphilis patients than in healthy controls, with trimethylamine N-oxide being the best candidate metabolic biomarker to differentiate the sera of syphilis patients and healthy controls [48]. A rise in oxidative stress products (AOPP, carbonyls) and nitrosative stress markers (nitrates/nitrites) in the sera of syphilis patients has been observed since the disease's earliest stages. These differential metabolites, which could potentially improve neurosyphilis and syphilis diagnostics in the future, deserve further exploration.

Others in diagnosis

Syphilis can be diagnosed by a number of different methods, such as those listed above as well as morphological observation, immunohistochemistry (IHC), the rabbit infectivity test (RIT), and in vitro culture. Dark-field microscopy (DFM) or direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) testing is the primary method of morphological observation [4]. This allows for the direct identification of spirochetes with characteristic shapes and movements from lesion exudate. When serologic tests fail to find T. pallidum antibodies, immunohistochemistry (IHC) might be used as a supplement. Although the IHC approach has high specificity for secondary syphilis, its sensitivity varies from 49 to 92% [49]. Furthermore, immunohistochemistry requires specific equipment and stains, might cross-react with different spirochetes, and yields subjective results [50]. T. pallidum could also be detected in tissue from mucocutaneous syphilis lesions at all stages using a combination of focus-floating microscopy (FFM) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is a speedy, reliable, economical, and enhanced immunohistochemical technique [51]. The New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit has long been recognized as the most useful practical animal model for determining in vivo infectivity of T. pallidum [51], and for good reason. While RIT was formerly considered a gold standard for the sensitive detection of T. pallidum in clinical samples, it is no longer used as such and is instead used as a benchmark against which the sensitivity of more modern techniques like PCR is evaluated. T. pallidum has been cultured in vitro for extended periods of time using a technique based on TpCM-2 media and the Sf1Ep co-culture system [52]. To effectively identify and diagnose syphilis, this method will need more development, although it shows great promise.

Antibiotics and treatment regimens

For a long time, benzathine penicillin G (BPG), administered by injection, has been the preferred drug for the treatment of patients at all stages of syphilis. The preparation used (i.e., benzathine, aqueous procaine, or aqueous crystalline), dosage, and length of treatment depend on the stage and clinical manifestations of the disease. A single dose of long-acting benzathine penicillin G of 2.4 million units, each side of the intramuscular injection of 1.2 million units, is an effective treatment for early stage syphilis (primary and secondary syphilis and early latent syphilis), whereas 2.4 million units administered intramuscularly weekly for 3 consecutive weeks is recommended for late latent syphilis and tertiary syphilis. Some experts recommend that primary, secondary, and early latent cases be treated with two doses of long-acting benzathine penicillin G 2·4 million units one week apart, particularly in the third trimester [53]. Short-acting penicillin agents are not adequate to cure syphilis. Table 2 details the recommended and alternative syphilis treatment regimens from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Notably, HIV-positive patients with early syphilis are more likely to have cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities than HIV-negative patients, so all people infected with HIV and syphilis should undergo careful neurologic ocular and otic examination tests [54]. However, HIV status does not affect the CDC treatment recommendations for all stages and for neurosyphilis, ocular, and otic syphilis. People with HIV and neurosyphilis should be treated according to the recommendations for persons with neurosyphilis and without HIV infection. Besides, available data suggest no clinical benefit to multiple doses of benzathine penicillin G for early syphilis in HIV-positive patients [55]. Interestingly, in HIV-infected people with early syphilis, a single dose of BPG plus doxycycline achieved a better serologic response than a single dose of BPG [56]. In addition, intravenous penicillin G is the only documented effective treatment for syphilis in pregnancy, and penicillin G is also the only known effective antibacterial agent for the treatment of fetal infection and the prevention of congenital syphilis. Pregnant women with syphilis at any stage who report a penicillin allergy should be desensitized and treated with penicillin. The treatment of congenital syphilis and neurological syphilis will not be discussed in this section due to their complexity.

Table 2 Recommended and alternative syphilis treatment regimens [130]

Effective non-penicillin-based regimens are required in patients with penicillin allergies, would provide alternative treatments during shortages of penicillin, and might be more conducive to administration and outpatient management. Doxycycline, tetracycline, and ceftriaxone can be used as substitutes for people who cannot use penicillin. The clinical and serologic outcomes of oral doxycycline treatment are similar to those of penicillin-based therapy, but a randomized controlled trial is necessary to determine the effectiveness of doxycycline in the treatment of early neurosyphilis. There have been other trials showing that doxycycline is effective in treating syphilis and syphilitic uveitis in pregnant women who were unable to undergo a penicillin desensitization [57, 58]. Additionally, there is increasing interest in using doxycycline for prophylaxis of this infection. T. pallidum showed a significant level of susceptibility to doxycycline in vitro, and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with doxycycline has been shown to be effective in preventing syphilis infection [59, 60]. Since tetracycline has more frequent dose requirements and more potential for gastrointestinal adverse effects, compliance is probably better with doxycycline than tetracycline [61]. Additionally, in both latent and primary syphilis patients, the ceftriaxone regimen has been shown to be noninferior to the BPG regimen. Syphilitic uveitis, neurosyphilis, and ocular syphilis, as well as syphilis-related membranous nephropathy, may respond well to ceftriaxone treatment in the absence of penicillin G [62,63,64,65]. However, the data are insufficient to recommend ceftriaxone or other cephalosporins for treatment of maternal infection and prevention of congenital syphilis [66]. More caution is needed when administering ceftriaxone to patients who are also allergic to penicillin due to the possibility of cross-allergy. The effectiveness, ideal dosage, and duration of amoxicillin in patients with various stages of syphilis must still be determined by additional research.

It is worth mentioning that, while researchers continue to investigate new syphilis treatment options, the emergence of worldwide antibiotic resistance requires us to pay attention. The genomic epidemiology of syphilis has revealed the independent emergence of macrolide resistance in several circulating lineages [67, 68]. According to research published in the 23S rRNA gene of T. pallidum, both A2058G and A2059G mutations are associated with failure of macrolide treatment [69]. These mutations are widespread throughout the world [70]. In addition, BPG was effective in NZW rabbits infected with strains harboring 23S rDNA mutations, but azithromycin failed [71]. Consequently, azithromycin cannot be used as an alternate therapy for syphilis patients at this time, despite the advice of recommendations [70]. In comparison to A2059G, the mutation A2058G confers macrolide resistance more commonly. Nevertheless, no strains with both mutations have been reported to date. In addition, the acquired tetracycline resistance gene tetB was amplified from the total DNA of a reliable number of T. pallidum-positive samples (i.e., 15/171) collected between 2014 and 2015 in Shandong province, and no point mutations in the 16SrRNA gene were detected. Tetracyclines have been proposed as an alternative to BPG for the treatment of syphilis; nevertheless, there is concern about the potential emergence of tetracycline-resistant strains of T. pallidum. Table 3 summarizes in detail the mutation sites associated with drug resistance in T. pallidum strains. With the emergence and spread of resistant T. pallidum, the availability of treatment options is decreasing. Fortunately, there is still no evidence of penicillin resistance. Hence, penicillin is the recommended course of treatment for syphilis.

Table 3 Mutant loci associated with drug resistance of T. pallidum strains

Vaccines

Research on a vaccine against T. pallidum has moved at a slower pace than that into vaccines against other diseases. T. pallidum’s outer membrane is fragile, in vitro mass growth of T. pallidum is challenging, and the mature use of transgenic procedures all limit the relevant technology, making further advances in this area necessary. Vaccines against T. pallidum are currently available in a variety of forms, including live attenuated, inactivated, DNA, and recombinant proteins (Table 4).

Table 4 Studies on antigens for T.pallidum vaccines

Inactivated and live attenuated vaccines

Metzger first demonstrated that T. pallidum could produce partial protection by immunizing NZW rabbits with T. pallidum stored at 4 °C, heated at 100 °C, or treated with penicillin by either intravenous or intradermal injections[72]. Miller claims that inoculating NZW rabbits with a radioactively inactivated form of T. pallidum provided them with protection against infection for a year. In clinical trials, this vaccine has been demonstrated to be more effective than any other in preventing the disease. One of the limitations of inactivated vaccines is that large quantities of T. pallidum are not available for use. An improved in vitro cell co-culture method and the first attempt at genetic engineering of T. pallidum have opened up many possibilities, including providing T. pallidum for inactivated vaccines and possibly even targeting virulence factors responsible for immune escape and persistence to obtain attenuated strains to inform vaccine development efforts [52, 73]. However, difficulties in producing large-scale in vitro cultures have impeded the future development of inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines.

DNA vaccines

As mentioned previously, Tp92 + IL-2, Gpd + IL-2, and FlaB3 immunized NZW rabbits displayed attenuated lesions as well as significant decreases in blood, liver, spleen, and testis T. pallidum levels [74,75,76]. It should be noted, however, that DNA vaccines are at risk of insertional mutagenesis, which occurs when exogenous genes are incorporated into the chromosomes of host cells and can lead to immunological tolerance after several application sessions.

Recombinant protein vaccines

Vaccines made from recombinant proteins have been the subject of much research and testing, since they are free of potentially dangerous active components and can be mass-produced at a low price. The first step in creating a T. pallidum protein vaccine is to screen and investigate T. pallidum proteins that interact with host cells during the first stages of infection. Growing evidence suggests that T. pallidum’s early adherence and colonization of target cells in hosts is crucial to the establishment of its eventual syphilis, which is connected with immune escape and immunological tolerance in the chronic systemic infection of syphilis. Thus, the outer membrane proteins and various membrane lipoproteins of the T. pallidum that are the earliest to come into direct contact with host cells have become the focus of research on T. pallidum vaccines[77]. In particular, rare outer membrane proteins of T. pallidum (e.g., Tp92) and adhesins that bind to extracellular matrix proteins (e.g., Tp0751 and Tp0136). Besides, numerous studies have also confirmed that the outer membrane proteins Tp92, Tp0769, Tp0663, and TprK; and the outer membrane lipoproteins Tp0751 and Tp0136 can all induce partial protective immunity [78,79,80,81].

Only Tp92 of T. pallidum has sequence similarity with gram-negative outer membrane proteins (OMPs). There is a considerable degree of homology between the amino acid sequences of Tp92 from 11 different strains representing 4 different pathogenic treponemes, and vaccination with recombinant Tp92 provides some immunological protection for NZW rabbits against T. pallidum infection [78]. TprK (Tp0897) is a target of opsonic antibodies and the protective immune response since it is one of T. pallidum’s rare outer membrane proteins (REMP). T. pallidum relies heavily on antigenic variation to evade the immune system, and the TprK variable regions have been shown to be an important target of the humoral immune response during experimental infection. A recent study found that immunization with the recombinant protein TprK dramatically reduced the frequency of lesions, sped up the healing process, and slowed the progression of cutaneous lesions from early stages to ulceration [80, 82]. In addition, Nikhat Parveen found that immunizing NZW rabbits with non-pathogenic B. burgdorferi expressing TprK resulted in a robust humoral response and partial protection [82]. It is important to remember that TprK displays a great deal of variation both across and within strains. This gene’s sequence diversity is partitioned into seven distinct variable (V) regions (V1–V7) that are separated by conserved sequences. Additional genomic sequencing showed that individuals with primary and secondary syphilis had substantial variability at the intrastrain level in V6 [83]. Meanwhile, rabbits pre-immunized with V6 region synthetic peptides had a more rapid accumulation of V6 variant treponemes than control rabbits [84]. Furthermore, the amino acid sequences of V6 also presented increased diversity at the interstrain level over time during T. pallidum infection [85]. Consequently, V6 may be the initial region to alter in primary syphilis samples. Recent genome sequencing has shown even more variation in genes like TprK that are candidates for vaccines, laying the groundwork for vaccine development [86]. Besides, the homologous protein family of Tpr, including TprL, TprC, and TprD, also has potential for vaccine development [87, 88]. Immunization of guinea pigs with Tp0769 (also known as TmpB) induces protection against T. pallidum infection [89]. In addition, NZW rabbits immunized by Tp0136 exhibited increased specific antibody titers, attenuated lesion development, increased cellular infiltration at the lesion sites, and inhibition of treponemal dissemination to distant organs compared to the unimmunized animals [79, 90]. Popliteal lymph nodes were transplanted from killed rabbits with healed syphilitic lesions; however, DFA showed the presence of T. pallidum in the testicles of all inoculated rabbits [90]. This suggests that anti-Tp0136 antibodies may not be protective. When compared to Tp0136-immunized and unimmunized rabbits, Tp0663-immunized rabbits had a significantly lower treponemal load at the main lesion sites; and the chancre displayed in Tp0663-immunized rabbits healed more rapidly [79].

However, whether Tp0751 is a feasible immunization candidate is still up for debate. In a study done by Karen V. Lithgow, Tp0751 immunization was found to lessen the severity of lesions, slow the spread of T. pallidum, and cause more immune cells to gather at the sites of lesions. What’s exciting is that lymph nodes collected from Tp0751-immunized NZW rabbits failed to cause productive infection when injected into naive NZW rabbits [81]; on the other hand, Amit Luthra demonstrated that immunization with Tp0751, a bipartite T. pallidum lipoprotein with an intrinsically disordered region and lipocalin fold, fails to induce regulatory or protective antibodies in the rabbit model of experimental syphilis [91]. Future confirmation of the immunoprotective characteristics of Tp0751 might necessitate the use of novel approaches, such as genetic modification.

Other T. pallidum recombinant proteins have been shown to elicit powerful antibody or T-cell immune responses that suppress the progression of syphilitic lesions; these include Tp0126, Tp0821, TpGpd, TprI, Tp17, and the extracellular loop (ECL) of Tp0856 and Tp0858 [5, 82, 92,93,94]. While more research is needed to confirm that the aforementioned recombinant proteins indeed have immunoprotective properties, the data presented here should be useful in shaping future vaccine research.

Preclinical models

Despite the availability and evidence-based treatment option of penicillin for more than 70 years, syphilis remains a public health threat. At the same time, due to practical and ethical considerations, research on therapeutic interventions and vaccine development for human subjects is limited. Therefore, relevant preclinical models are needed to investigate vaccine development and new treatments for syphilis. Preclinical models also play a key role in clinical transformation. The ability to conduct both forward translation, the process of translating basic research findings into practice, and reverse translation, the process of elucidating the mechanistic basis of clinical observation, will greatly improve the ability to develop effective anti-syphilis control strategies [95]. In addition to the routinely used cell lines and primary cell models (peripheral blood or bone marrow), a series of novel experimental models, such as in vitro culture and mouse models (Fig. 2), have recently emerged.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Preclinical models. At present, the commonly used preclinical syphilis models include heterologous expression models, in vitro culture models, and animal models. Heterologous expression models, such as Borrelia burgdorferi, oral spirochete Treponema, and Treponema phagedenis, contributed to identifying and determining the functional characteristics of T. pallidum proteins. Tp0435, Tp0954, and Tp0751 were identified as adhesins by a Borrelia burgdorferi heterologous expression system and adhered to mammalian endothelial cells and placental cell lines. The first long-term in vitro culture of T. pallidum was reported in 2018. This system utilized coincubation of the T. pallidum with Sf1Ep cottontail rabbit epithelial cells in a microaerobic environment containing 1.5% oxygen and 5% CO2. An altered medium, TpCM-2, is very important; the principal modification was the replacement of the basal medium, Eagle’s minimal essential medium (Eagle’s MEM), with a more complex tissue culture medium, CMRL 1066. Successful models of T. pallidum infection have been established in a variety of animals, including the NZW rabbit, nonhuman primate (NHP) (macaque), LSH hamster, guinea pig, and mouse. In light of its convenience and inexpensive cost, the NZW rabbit model of T. pallidum infection is favored by scientists. Although T. pallidum can successfully infect mice, it lacks obvious clinical manifestations. As a result, further study is required before mice may be used as a model for syphilis research. Preclinical models are utilized in studies on the underlying features and pathophysiology of T. pallidum infection, and they may be exploited to produce cutting-edge diagnostics and vaccines

Heterologous expression models

Before in vitro co-culture systems were developed, several heterologous expression models, such as Borrelia burgdorferi, oral spirochete Treponema, and Treponema phagedenis, contributed to identifying and determining the functional characteristics of T. pallidum proteins. The extracellular pathogen Borrelia burgdorferi, which can also cause systemic diseases, seems to be the best model. Borrelia burgdorferi serves as a model organism because both Tp0435 and Tp0954 have been shown to act as adhesins and adhere to mammalian ECs, gliomas, and placental cell lines [96, 97]. In addition, Tp0751, heterologously expressed by strains of Borrelia burgdorferi, not only mediates spirochete attachment to endothelial cells, but also plays a role as a vascular adhesin [98, 99]. Interestingly, a strong humoral response was observed by Parveen in NZW rabbits immunized against non-pathogenic Borrelia burgdorferi expressing TprK and was partially protective [82]. Further advancements in in vitro culture systems and genetic manipulation technologies may eventually replace the heterologous expression system of Borrelia burgdorferi, which has the potential to characterize the functional properties of T. pallidum proteins and virulence factors.

In vitro culture models

T. pallidum is one of the few pathogenic bacteria that is notoriously challenging to culture in vitro, as is well-known. A system consisting of T. pallidum coculture with cottontail rabbit epithelium (Sf1Ep) was initially proposed in the early 1980s, but T. pallidum could only survive in vitro for 1 to 2 weeks [100]. Recently, Edmondson et al. have found that T. pallidum could be consistently cultured in a modified Sf1Ep co-culture system, in which continuous growth of T. pallidum in vitro was dependent upon co‐culture with Sf1Ep cottontail rabbit epithelial cells in a specialized tissue culture medium (T. pallidum culture medium 2, or TpCM‐2) under microaerobic conditions (a GasPak™ 150 vented anaerobic jar [Brewer jar] filling with 1.5% O2, 5% CO2, and 93.5% N2) ever since 2018 [52, 101]. T. pallidum’s remarkable in vitro culture system greatly aided in the creation of genetic tools. With the help of homologous recombination, Romeis et al. were able to replace the TprA (Tp0009) pseudogene in the SS14 T. pallidum strain with a kanamycin resistance (kanR) cassette [73]. This discovery will allow the application of functional genetics techniques to study syphilis pathogenesis and improve syphilis vaccine development.

Animal models

In addition, scientists may learn more about syphilis's causes, cures, and prevention methods with the use of animal models. Successful models of T. pallidum infection have been established in a variety of animals, including the NZW rabbit, nonhuman primate (NHP) (macaque), LSH hamster, guinea pig, and mouse [102,103,104,105]. As far as we know, the NZW rabbit and the NHP model (macaques) are the only animals whose syphilis phenotypes (lesions) are most comparable to those seen in humans [102, 103]. In light of its convenience and inexpensive cost, the NZW rabbit model of T. pallidum infection is favored by scientists. For isolating novel strains of T. pallidum from clinical samples, the NZW rabbit model is also crucial [106]. Therefore, the rabbit model is not only the best animal model for studying syphilis vaccine candidates, but also the most widely used model by researchers, as it allows for in-depth pathogenesis research, evaluation of new therapies, and testing of potential vaccine candidates [81, 91]. Nevertheless, genetic modification of rabbit models is more challenging; as technology advances, CRISPR/Cas9 may help alleviate this difficulty. The first transgenic rabbit line was created in 1985, and in 2014, CRISPR/Cas9 was successfully used to create gene-knockout rabbits [107]. It is also worth noting that the present assembly of the rabbit genome is still incomplete. Off-target effects are a major problem with the Cas9 system for gene targeting. It is expected that the researchers will be able to produce viable models of immunodeficient and knockout rabbits for use in syphilis studies in the near future.

Despite the importance of rabbit models, their use is still limited compared to mice. Mice models have become powerful tools for many studies, in large part due to the lower variability between individuals, the lower cost, and the wide availability of reagents. A syphilitic infection model in C57BL/6 mice has been developed recently [105]. The study has shown that T. pallidum can colonize the heart, liver, spleen, kidney, testis, and brain of C57BL/6 mice after infection, but the inflammatory response of C57BL/6 mice after infection is mild and lacks obvious clinical manifestations [105]. As a result, further study is required before mice may be used as a model for syphilis research.

Conclusion and outlook

Clinical strategies for the diagnosis, control, and prevention of T. pallidum have advanced in sophistication with the growing understanding of its pathogenic mechanisms. The diagnosis of syphilis is complex, and serological testing is still the gold standard for the diagnosis of syphilis patients. It is worth noting that NAAT may be a promising method for detecting T. pallidum DNA in syphilis patient samples. In addition to the routine diagnosis of syphilis by NAAT in blood and CSF, scholars have recently begun to experiment with biomarker and T. pallidum DNA testing in other specimen types as a proxy for transmissibility, including saliva, saliva, urine, semen, oropharynx, and anorectum. Recently, researchers have developed a PCR-LwCas13a syphilis assays that may offer a promising alternative to sequencing-based methods for molecular surveillance and drug resistance genotyping. As metabolomics and proteomics breakthroughs are made, biomarkers based on those technologies are also being found to be exciting. Meanwhile, vaccines for syphilis have recently been developed, mainly targeting outer membrane proteins and various membrane lipoproteins of T. pallidum. The Tpr paralogous homologous protein family, including TprK, TprL, TprC, and TprD, has also been extensively studied through genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis of the most common strains in clinical practice, providing a favorable basis for future vaccine studies. In addition, with the development of T. pallidum in vitro culture and genetic modification of these preclinical models, it will further provide more rapid, accurate, and effective methods for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of syphilis.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Orbe-Orihuela YC, Sánchez-Alemán MÁ, Hernández-Pliego A, Medina-García CV, Vergara-Ortega DN. Syphilis as re-emerging disease, antibiotic resistance, and vulnerable population: global systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathogens (Basel Switzerland). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11121546.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghanem KG, Ram S, Rice PA. The modern epidemic of syphilis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(9):845–54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1901593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Forrestel AK, Kovarik CL, Katz KA. Sexually acquired syphilis: Historical aspects, microbiology, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Forrestel AK, Kovarik CL, Katz KA. Sexually acquired syphilis: laboratory diagnosis, management, and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.074.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu N, Li N, Hu L, He J, Li J, Zhao F, et al. Immunogenicity and immunoreactivity of Tp0821 recombinant protein from Treponema pallidum. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(1):851–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2017.6675.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith BC, Simpson Y, Morshed MG, Cowen LL, Hof R, Wetherell C, et al. New proteins for a new perspective on syphilis diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(1):105–11. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01390-12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Voorhis WC, Barrett LK, Lukehart SA, Schmidt B, Schriefer M, Cameron CE. Serodiagnosis of syphilis: antibodies to recombinant Tp0453, Tp92, and Gpd proteins are sensitive and specific indicators of infection by Treponema pallidum. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(8):3668–74. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.8.3668-3674.2003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang C, Zhao F, Xiao J, Zeng T, Yu J, Ma X, et al. Evaluation of the recombinant protein TpF1 of Treponema pallidum for serodiagnosis of syphilis. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI. 2013;20(10):1563–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00122-13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu W, Deng M, Zhang X, Yin W, Zhao T, Zeng T, et al. Performance of novel infection phase-dependent antigens in syphilis serodiagnosis and treatment efficacy determination. Clin Chim Acta Int J Clin Chem. 2019;488:13–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.10.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu M, Xie Y, Jiang C, Xiao Y, Kuang X, Zhao F, et al. A novel ELISA using a recombinant outer membrane protein, rTp0663, as the antigen for serological diagnosis of syphilis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;43:51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.12.013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Runina AV, Starovoitova AS, Deryabin DG, Kubanov AA. Evaluation of the recombinant protein Tp0965 of Treponema pallidum as perspective antigen for the improved serological diagnosis of syphilis. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2016;71(2):109–13. https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xie Y, Xu M, Wang C, Xiao J, Xiao Y, Jiang C, et al. Diagnostic value of recombinant Tp0821 protein in serodiagnosis for syphilis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;62(4):336–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12554.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang C, Xiao J, Xie Y, Xiao Y, Wang C, Kuang X, et al. Evaluation of FlaB1, FlaB2, FlaB3, and Tp0463 of Treponema pallidum for serodiagnosis of syphilis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84(2):105–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Backhouse JL, Nesteroff SI. Treponema pallidum western blot: comparison with the FTA-ABS test as a confirmatory test for syphilis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001;39(1):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-8893(00)00213-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ijsselmuiden OE, Schouls LM, Stolz E, Aelbers GN, Agterberg CM, Top J, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using the recombinant DNA-derived Treponema pallidum protein TmpA for serodiagnosis of syphilis and the potential use of TmpA for assessing the effect of antibiotic therapy. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(1):152–7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.27.1.152-157.1989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gayet-Ageron A, Combescure C, Lautenschlager S, Ninet B, Perneger TV. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PCR targeting the 47-kilodalton protein membrane gene of Treponema pallidum and PCR targeting the DNA polymerase I gene: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(11):3522–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01619-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gayet-Ageron A, Lautenschlager S, Ninet B, Perneger TV, Combescure C. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of PCR in the diagnosis of syphilis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexually Transmitted Infect. 2013;89(3):251–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2012-050622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao Y, Xie Y, Xu M, Liu S, Jiang C, Zhao F, et al. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the detection of Treponema pallidum DNA in the peripheral blood of secondary syphilis patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97(6):1673–8. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grillová L, Pĕtrošová H, Mikalová L, Strnadel R, Dastychová E, Kuklová I, et al. Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum in the Czech Republic during 2011 to 2013: increased prevalence of identified genotypes and of isolates with macrolide resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(10):3693–700. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01292-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva ÂA, de Oliveira UD, Vasconcelos LD, Foti L, Leony LM, Daltro RT, et al. Performance of Treponema pallidum recombinant proteins in the serological diagnosis of syphilis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6): e0234043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gayet-Ageron A, Sednaoui P, Lautenschlager S, Ferry T, Toutous-Trellu L, Cavassini M, et al. Use of Treponema pallidum PCR in testing of ulcers for diagnosis of primary syphilis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(1):127–9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2101.140790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubourg G, Edouard S, Prudent E, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Incidental syphilis diagnosed by real-time PCR screening of urine samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(11):3707–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01026-15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Centurion-Lara A, Castro C, Shaffer JM, Van Voorhis WC, Marra CM, Lukehart SA. Detection of Treponema pallidum by a sensitive reverse transcriptase PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(6):1348–52. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.35.6.1348-1352.1997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vrbová E, Mikalová L, Grillová L, Pospíšilová P, Strnadel R, Dastychová E, et al. A retrospective study on nested PCR detection of syphilis treponemes in clinical samples: PCR detection contributes to the diagnosis of syphilis in patients with seronegative and serodiscrepant results. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8): e0237949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237949.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang C, Zheng X, Guan Z, Zou D, Gu X, Lu H, et al. Quantified detection of Treponema pallidum DNA by PCR assays in urine and plasma of syphilis patients. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10: e0177221. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01772-21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen W, Luo H, Zeng L, Pan Y, Parr JB, Jiang Y, et al. A suite of PCR-LwCas13a assays for detection and genotyping of Treponema pallidum in clinical samples. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4671. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32250-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang C, Hu Z, Zheng X, Ye M, Liao C, Shang M, et al. A new specimen for syphilis diagnosis: evidence by high loads of Treponema pallidum DNA in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cornut PL, Sobas CR, Perard L, De Bats F, Salord H, Manificat HJ, et al. Detection of Treponema pallidum in aqueous humor by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2011;19(2):127–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09273948.2010.531175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nieuwenburg SA, Zondag HCA, Bruisten SM, Jongen VW, Schim van der Loeff MF, van Dam AP, et al. Detection of Treponema pallidum DNA during early syphilis stages in peripheral blood, oropharynx, ano-rectum and urine as a proxy for transmissibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gimenes F, Medina FS, Abreu AL, Irie MM, Esquiçati IB, Malagutti N, et al. Sensitive simultaneous detection of seven sexually transmitted agents in semen by multiplex-PCR and of HPV by single PCR. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6): e98862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang T, Yang J, Zhang J, Ke W, Zou F, Wan C, et al. MicroRNA-101-3p downregulates TLR2 expression, leading to reduction in cytokine production by Treponema pallidum-stimulated macrophages. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140(8):1566-75.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2019.12.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang T, Zhang J, Ke W, Zhang X, Chen W, Yang J, et al. MicroRNA expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells associated with syphilis. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-4846-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang J, Huang T, Zhao P, Lin X, Feng Z, Senhong C, et al. MicroRNA-101-3p, MicroRNA-195-5p, and MicroRNA-223-3p in peripheral blood mononuclear cells may serve as novel biomarkers for syphilis diagnosis. Microb Pathog. 2021;152: 104769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2021.104769.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang Z, Yang X, Gan Z, Yuan L, Liu W, Si C. Genome-wide MicroRNA analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells reveals elevated miR-142-3p expression as a potential biomarker for secondary syphilis. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5520053. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5520053.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Jia X, Wang Z, Liu X, Zheng H, Li J. Peripheral blood mononuclear cell microRNA profiles in syphilitic patients with serofast status. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(5):3407–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05421-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li D, Huang X, Shi M, Luo L, Tao C. Diagnostic role of CXCL13 and CSF serology in patients with neurosyphilis. Sexually Transmitted Infect. 2021;97(7):485–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2020-054778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dong X, Zhang J, Yang F, Liu J, Peng Y, Ge Y. CXCL8, CXCL9, and CXCL10 serum levels increase in syphilitic patients with seroresistance. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021;35(11): e24016. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang C, Wu K, Yu Q, Zhang S, Gao Z, Liu Y, et al. CXCL13, CXCL10 and CXCL8 as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of neurosyphilis patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:33569. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33569.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li W, Wu W, Chang H, Jiang M, Gao J, Xu Y, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid cytokines in patients with neurosyphilis: the significance of interleukin-10 for the disease. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:3812671. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3812671.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Li X-X, Zhang J, Wang Z-Y, Chen S-Q, Zhou W-F, Wang T-T, et al. Increased CCL24 and CXCL7 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurosyphilis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(9): e23366. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang C, Zhu L, Gao Z, Guan Z, Lu H, Shi M, et al. Increased interleukin-17 in peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid of neurosyphilis patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(7): e3004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shen Y, Dong X, Liu J, Lv H, Ge Y. Serum interleukin-26 is a potential biomarker for the differential diagnosis of neurosyphilis and syphilis at other stages. Infection Drug Resist. 2022;15:3693–702. https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.S366308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Osbak KK, Houston S, Lithgow KV, Meehan CJ, Strouhal M, Šmajs D, et al. Characterizing the syphilis-causing Treponema pallidum ssp. pallidum proteome using complementary mass spectrometry. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(9): e0004988. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004988.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Osbak KK, Van Raemdonck GA, Dom M, Cameron CE, Meehan CJ, Deforce D, et al. Candidate Treponema pallidum biomarkers uncovered in urine from individuals with syphilis using mass spectrometry. Future Microbiol. 2018;13(13):1497–510. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2018-0182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tong ML, Liu D, Liu LL, Lin LR, Zhang HL, Tian HM, et al. Identification of Treponema pallidum-specific protein biomarkers in syphilis patient serum using mass spectrometry. Future Microbiol. 2021;16:1041–51. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2021-0172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu LL, Lin Y, Chen W, Tong ML, Luo X, Lin LR, et al. Metabolite profiles of the cerebrospinal fluid in neurosyphilis patients determined by untargeted metabolomics analysis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Qi S, Xu Y, Luo R, Li P, Huang Z, Huang S, et al. Novel biochemical insights in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurosyphilis based on a metabonomics study. J Mol Neurosci MN. 2019;69(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01320-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu LL, Lin Y, Zhuang JC, Ren J, Jiang XY, Chen MH, et al. Analysis of serum metabolite profiles in syphilis patients by untargeted metabolomics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2019;33(7):1378–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15530.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Theel ES, Katz SS, Pillay A. Molecular and direct detection tests for Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum: a review of the literature, 1964–2017. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Luo Y, Xie Y, Xiao Y. Laboratory diagnostic tools for syphilis: current status and future prospects. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10: 574806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.574806.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Müller H, Eisendle K, Bräuninger W, Kutzner H, Cerroni L, Zelger B. Comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry, polymerase chain reaction and focus-floating microscopy for the detection of Treponema pallidum in mucocutaneous lesions of primary, secondary and tertiary syphilis. Br J Dermatol. 2011;165(1):50–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10314.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Edmondson DG, Hu B, Norris SJ. Long-term in vitro culture of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. MBio. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01153-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Peeling RW, Mabey D, Chen X-S, Garcia PJ. Syphilis. Lancet (London, England). 2023;402(10398):336–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02348-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Seña AC, Zhang X-H, Li T, Zheng H-P, Yang B, Yang L-G, et al. A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: rethinking the significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after therapy. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:479. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1209-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Ganesan A, Mesner O, Okulicz JF, O’Bryan T, Deiss RG, Lalani T, et al. A single dose of benzathine penicillin G is as effective as multiple doses of benzathine penicillin G for the treatment of HIV-infected persons with early syphilis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(4):653–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu888.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen K-H, Sun H-Y, Chen C-H, Chuang Y-C, Huang Y-S, Liu W-D, et al. Higher serologic responses of early syphilis to single-dose benzathine penicillin G plus doxycycline versus single-dose benzathine penicillin G alone among people with HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad508.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tillery KA, Smiley SG, Thomas E. Treatment of syphilis with doxycycline in a pregnant woman unable to be desensitized to penicillin. Sex Transm Dis. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Amode R, Makhloufi S, Calin R, Caumes E. Oral doxycycline for syphilitic uveitis: a case report highlighting potential efficacy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(7):1999–2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Edmondson DG, Wormser GP, Norris SJ. Susceptibility of Treponema pallidum subsp. to doxycycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00979-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Tran NK, Goldstein ND, Welles SL. Countering the rise of syphilis: a role for doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis? Int J STD AIDS. 2022;33(1):18–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/09564624211042444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Stamm LV. Global challenge of antibiotic-resistant Treponema pallidum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):583–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01095-09.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Agostini FA, Queiroz RP, Azevedo DOM, Henriques JF, Campos WR, Vasconcelos-Santos DV. Intravenous ceftriaxone for syphilitic uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2018;26(7):1059–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2017.1311926.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bettuzzi T, Jourdes A, Robineau O, Alcaraz I, Manda V, Molina JM, et al. Ceftriaxone compared with benzylpenicillin in the treatment of neurosyphilis in France: a retrospective multicentre study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21(10):1441–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30857-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Louis Philippe S, Promelle V, Taright N, Rahmania N, Jany B, Errera MH, et al. Ocular syphilis, the rise of a forgotten disease: retrospective study of 18 cases diagnosed at Amiens University Hospital. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2021;44(10):1566–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.04.017.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Hazue R, Ueno T, Nozaki H, Kinowaki K, Ohashi K, Hoshino J, et al. Syphilis-associated membranous nephropathy successfully treated with amoxicillin. Clin Nephrol. 2021;96(5):297–301. https://doi.org/10.5414/CN110586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Katanami Y, Hashimoto T, Takaya S, Yamamoto K, Kutsuna S, Takeshita N, et al. Amoxicillin and ceftriaxone as treatment alternatives to penicillin for maternal syphilis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):827–9. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2305.161936.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Beale MA, Marks M, Sahi SK, Tantalo LC, Nori AV, French P, et al. Genomic epidemiology of syphilis reveals independent emergence of macrolide resistance across multiple circulating lineages. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11216-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Arora N, Schuenemann VJ, Jäger G, Peltzer A, Seitz A, Herbig A, et al. Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16245. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Lukehart SA, Godornes C, Molini BJ, Sonnett P, Hopkins S, Mulcahy F, et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the United States and Ireland. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):154–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Janier M, Unemo M, Dupin N, Tiplica GS, Potočnik M, Patel R. 2020 European guideline on the management of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2021;35(3):574–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16946.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Molini BJ, Tantalo LC, Sahi SK, Rodriguez VI, Brandt SL, Fernandez MC, et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum correlates with 23S rDNA mutations in recently isolated clinical strains. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(9):579–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000486.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Metzger M, Michalska E, Podwińska J, Smogór W. Immunogenic properties of the protein component of Treponema pallidum. Br J Vener Dis. 1969;45(4):299–304. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.45.4.299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Romeis E, Tantalo L, Lieberman N, Phung Q, Greninger A, Giacani L. Genetic engineering of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, the syphilis spirochete. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(7): e1009612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009612.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhao F, Wu Y, Zhang X, Yu J, Gu W, Liu S, et al. Enhanced immune response and protective efficacy of a Treponema pallidum Tp92 DNA vaccine vectored by chitosan nanoparticles and adjuvanted with IL-2. Hum Vaccin. 2011;7(10):1083–9. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.7.10.16541.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhao F, Zhang X, Liu S, Zeng T, Yu J, Gu W, et al. Assessment of the immune responses to Treponema pallidum Gpd DNA vaccine adjuvanted with IL-2 and chitosan nanoparticles before and after Treponema pallidum challenge in rabbits. Sci China Life Sci. 2013;56(2):174–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-012-4434-4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Zheng K, Xu M, Xiao Y, Luo H, Xie Y, Yu J, et al. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Treponema pallidum in New Zealand rabbits immunized with plasmid DNA encoding flagellin. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7(1):177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41426-018-0176-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Chen J, Huang J, Liu Z, Xie Y. Treponema pallidum outer membrane proteins: current status and prospects. Pathog Dis. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/femspd/ftac023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Cameron CE, Lukehart SA, Castro C, Molini B, Godornes C, Van Voorhis WC. Opsonic potential, protective capacity, and sequence conservation of the Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum Tp92. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(4):1401–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/315399.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Xu M, Xie Y, Zheng K, Luo H, Tan M, Zhao F, et al. Two potential syphilis vaccine candidates inhibit dissemination of Treponema pallidum. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 759474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.759474.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Morgan CA, Lukehart SA, Van Voorhis WC. Immunization with the N-terminal portion of Treponema pallidum repeat protein K attenuates syphilitic lesion development in the rabbit model. Infect Immun. 2002;70(12):6811–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.70.12.6811-6816.2002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Lithgow KV, Hof R, Wetherell C, Phillips D, Houston S, Cameron CE. A defined syphilis vaccine candidate inhibits dissemination of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14273. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Parveen N, Fernandez MC, Haynes AM, Zhang RL, Godornes BC, Centurion-Lara A, et al. Non-pathogenic Borrelia burgdorferi expressing Treponema pallidum TprK and Tp0435 antigens as a novel approach to evaluate syphilis vaccine candidates. Vaccine. 2019;37(13):1807–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Liu D, Tong ML, Lin Y, Liu LL, Lin LR, Yang TC. Insights into the genetic variation profile of tprK in Treponema pallidum during the development of natural human syphilis infection. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(7): e0007621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Giacani L, Molini BJ, Kim EY, Godornes BC, Leader BT, Tantalo LC, et al. Antigenic variation in Treponema pallidum: TprK sequence diversity accumulates in response to immune pressure during experimental syphilis. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md:1950). 2010;184(7):3822–9. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0902788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Lin MJ, Haynes AM, Addetia A, Lieberman NAP, Phung Q, Xie H, et al. Longitudinal TprK profiling of in vivo and in vitro-propagated Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum reveals accumulation of antigenic variants in absence of immune pressure. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(9): e0009753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Lieberman NAP, Lin MJ, Xie H, Shrestha L, Nguyen T, Huang ML, et al. Treponema pallidum genome sequencing from six continents reveals variability in vaccine candidate genes and dominance of Nichols clade strains in Madagascar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(12): e0010063. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Haynes AM, Fernandez M, Romeis E, Mitjà O, Konda KA, Vargas SK, et al. Transcriptional and immunological analysis of the putative outer membrane protein and vaccine candidate TprL of Treponema pallidum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15(1): e0008812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008812.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Molini B, Fernandez MC, Godornes C, Vorobieva A, Lukehart SA, Giacani L. B-cell epitope mapping of TprC and TprD variants of Treponema pallidum subspecies informs vaccine development for human treponematoses. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 862491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.862491.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Wicher K, Schouls LM, Wicher V, Van Embden JD, Nakeeb SS. Immunization of guinea pigs with recombinant TmpB antigen induces protection against challenge infection with Treponema pallidum Nichols. Infect Immun. 1991;59(12):4343–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.59.12.4343-4348.1991.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Li QL, Tong ML, Liu LL, Lin LR, Lin Y, Yang TC. Effect of anti-TP0136 antibodies on the progression of lesions in an infected rabbit model. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;83: 106428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Luthra A, Montezuma-Rusca JM, La Vake CJ, LeDoyt M, Delgado KN, Davenport TC, et al. Evidence that immunization with TP0751, a bipartite Treponema pallidum lipoprotein with an intrinsically disordered region and lipocalin fold, fails to protect in the rabbit model of experimental syphilis. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(9): e1008871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008871.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Haynes AM, Godornes C, Ke W, Giacani L. Evaluation of the protective ability of the Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum Tp0126 OmpW homolog in the rabbit model of syphilis. Infect Immunity. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00323-19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Sun ES, Molini BJ, Barrett LK, Centurion-Lara A, Lukehart SA, Van Voorhis WC. Subfamily I Treponema pallidum repeat protein family: sequence variation and immunity. Microb Infect. 2004;6(8):725–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2004.04.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Delgado KN, Montezuma-Rusca JM, Orbe IC, Caimano MJ, La Vake CJ, Luthra A, et al. Extracellular loops of the Treponema pallidum FadL orthologs TP0856 and TP0858 elicit IgG antibodies and IgG(+)-specific B-cells in the rabbit model of experimental syphilis. MBio. 2022;13(4): e0163922. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01639-22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Honkala A, Malhotra SV, Kummar S, Junttila MR. Harnessing the predictive power of preclinical models for oncology drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00301-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Primus S, Rocha SC, Giacani L, Parveen N. Identification and functional assessment of the first placental adhesin of Treponema pallidum that may play critical role in congenital syphilis. Front Microbiol. 2020;11: 621654. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.621654.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Chan K, Nasereddin T, Alter L, Centurion-Lara A, Giacani L, Parveen N. Treponema pallidum lipoprotein TP0435 expressed in Borrelia burgdorferi produces multiple surface/periplasmic isoforms and mediates adherence. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25593. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25593.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Parker ML, Houston S, Pětrošová H, Lithgow KV, Hof R, Wetherell C, et al. The structure of Treponema pallidum Tp0751 (Pallilysin) reveals a non-canonical lipocalin fold that mediates adhesion to extracellular matrix components and interactions with host cells. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(9): e1005919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005919.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Kao WA, Pětrošová H, Ebady R, Lithgow KV, Rojas P, Zhang Y, et al. Identification of Tp0751 (Pallilysin) as a Treponema pallidum vascular adhesin by heterologous expression in the lyme disease spirochete. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1538. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01589-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Fieldsteel AH, Cox DL, Moeckli RA. Further studies on replication of virulent Treponema pallidum in tissue cultures of Sf1Ep cells. Infect Immun. 1982;35(2):449–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Edmondson DG, DeLay BD, Kowis LE, Norris SJ. Parameters affecting continuous in vitro culture of Treponema pallidum strains. MBio. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03536-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Tantalo LC, Lukehart SA, Marra CM. Treponema pallidum strain-specific differences in neuroinvasion and clinical phenotype in a rabbit model. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(1):75–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/426510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Marra CM, Castro CD, Kuller L, Dukes AC, Centurion-Lara A, Morton WR, et al. Mechanisms of clearance of Treponema pallidum from the CSF in a nonhuman primate model. Neurology. 1998;51(4):957–61. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.51.4.957.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Schell RF, LeFrock JL, Chan JK, Bagasra O. LSH hamster model of syphilitic infection. Infect Immun. 1980;28(3):909–13. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.28.3.909-913.1980.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Lu S, Zheng K, Wang J, Xu M, Xie Y, Yuan S, et al. Characterization of Treponema pallidum dissemination in C57BL/6 Mice. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 577129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.577129.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Pereira LE, Katz SS, Sun Y, Mills P, Taylor W, Atkins P, et al. Successful isolation of Treponema pallidum strains from patients’ cryopreserved ulcer exudate using the rabbit model. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1): e0227769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Yang D, Xu J, Zhu T, Fan J, Lai L, Zhang J, et al. Effective gene targeting in rabbits using RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. J Mol Cell Biol. 2014;6(1):97–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjt047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Gerber A, Krell S, Morenz J. Recombinant Treponema pallidum antigens in syphilis serology. Immunobiology. 1996;196(5):535–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0171-2985(97)80070-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Deka RK, Goldberg MS, Hagman KE, Norgard MV. The Tp38 (TpMglB-2) lipoprotein binds glucose in a manner consistent with receptor function in Treponema pallidum. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(8):2303–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.8.2303-2308.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Reid TB, Molini BJ, Fernandez MC, Lukehart SA. Antigenic variation of TprK facilitates development of secondary syphilis. Infect Immun. 2014;82(12):4959–67. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.02236-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Centurion-Lara A, LaFond RE, Hevner K, Godornes C, Molini BJ, Van Voorhis WC, et al. Gene conversion: a mechanism for generation of heterogeneity in the tprK gene of Treponema pallidum during infection. Mol Microbiol. 2004;52(6):1579–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04086.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Heymans R, Kolader ME, van der Helm JJ, Coutinho RA, Bruisten SM. TprK gene regions are not suitable for epidemiological syphilis typing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28(7):875–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0717-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Xiao Y, Liu S, Liu Z, Xie Y, Jiang C, Xu M, et al. Molecular subtyping and surveillance of resistance genes in Treponema pallidum DNA from patients with secondary and latent syphilis in Hunan, China. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(5):310–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000445.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Zhu B, Bu J, Li W, Zhang J, Huang G, Cao J, et al. High resistance to azithromycin in clinical samples from patients with sexually transmitted diseases in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7): e0159787. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159787.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Liu D, He S-M, Zhu X-Z, Liu L-L, Lin L-R, Niu J-J, et al. Molecular characterization based on MLST and ECDC typing schemes and antibiotic resistance analyses of subsp. in Xiamen, China. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10: 618747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.618747.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Noda AA, Matos N, Blanco O, Rodríguez I, Stamm LV. First report of the 23S rRNA gene A2058G point mutation associated with macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum from syphilis patients in Cuba. Sex Transm Dis. 2016;43(5):332–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Read P, Jeoffreys N, Tagg K, Guy RJ, Gilbert GL, Donovan B. Azithromycin-resistant syphilis-causing strains in Sydney, Australia: prevalence and risk factors. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(8):2776–81. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00301-14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Vrbová E, Grillová L, Mikalová L, Pospíšilová P, Strnadel R, Dastychová E, et al. MLST typing of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum in the Czech Republic during 2004–2017: clinical isolates belonged to 25 allelic profiles and harbored 8 novel allelic variants. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5): e0217611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Khairullin R, Vorobyev D, Obukhov A, Kuular U-H, Kubanova A, Kubanov A, et al. Syphilis epidemiology in 1994–2013, molecular epidemiological strain typing and determination of macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in 2013–2014 in Tuva Republic, Russia. APMIS Acta Pathol Microbiol et Immunol Scand. 2016;124(7):595–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12541.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Gallo Vaulet L, Grillová L, Mikalová L, Casco R, Rodríguez Fermepin M, Pando MA, et al. Molecular typing of Treponema pallidum isolates from Buenos Aires, Argentina: Frequent Nichols-like isolates and low levels of macrolide resistance. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(2): e0172905. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172905.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Shuel M, Hayden K, Kadkhoda K, Tsang RSW. Molecular typing and macrolide resistance of syphilis cases in Manitoba, Canada, From 2012 to 2016. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;45(4):233–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000734.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Giacani L, Ciccarese G, Puga-Salazar C, Dal Conte I, Colli L, Cusini M, et al. Enhanced molecular typing of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum strains from 4 Italian Hospitals shows geographical differences in strain type heterogeneity, widespread resistance to macrolides, and lack of mutations associated with doxycycline resistance. Sex Transm Dis. 2018;45(4):237–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000741.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Kanai M, Arima Y, Nishiki S, Shimuta K, Itoda I, Matsui T, et al. Molecular typing and macrolide resistance analyses of Treponema pallidum in heterosexuals and men who have sex with men in Japan, 2017. J Clin Microbiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01167-18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. Fernández-Naval C, Arando M, Espasa M, Antón A, Fernández-Huerta M, Silgado A, et al. Enhanced molecular typing and macrolide and tetracycline-resistance mutations of in Barcelona. Future Microbiol. 2019;14:1099–108. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2019-0123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Sanchez A, Mayslich C, Malet I, Grange PA, Janier M, Saule J, et al. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance genes in Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum from patients with early syphilis in France. Acta Dermato-Venereol. 2020;100(14):00221. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Coelho EC, Souza SB, Costa CCS, Costa LM, Pinheiro LML, Machado LFA, et al. Treponema pallidum in female sex workers from the Brazilian Marajó Archipelago: prevalence, risk factors, drug-resistant mutations and coinfections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021;115(7):792–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/traa127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Venter JME, Müller EE, Mahlangu MP, Kularatne RS. Treponema pallidum macrolide resistance and molecular epidemiology in Southern Africa, 2008 to 2018. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(10): e0238520. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02385-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Xiao H, Li Z, Li F, Wen J, Liu D, Du W, et al. Preliminary study of tetracycline resistance genes in Treponema pallidum. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;9:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2017.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Miller JN. Immunity in experimental syphilis VI Successful vaccination of rabbits with Treponema pallidum, Nichols strain, attenuated by -irradiation. J Immunol (Baltimore Md: 1950). 1973;110(5):1206–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Syphilis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/syphilis.htm

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81971980), Major Scientific and Technological Projects for collaborative prevention and control of birth defects in Hunan Province (no. 2019SK1010), Hunan Province Natural Science Foundation (no. 2021JJ30604) and Key Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (no. 20221064723), Scientific Research and Innovation Project of postgraduates in Hunan Province (No. CX20220974).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XS, LZ, wrote the manuscript, XS, LZ, ZX, LW summarized the table and prepared figures. HS, DX, ZJ, YJ reviewed and revised the manuscript. ZF and LS conceived the projects and revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuangquan Liu or Feijun Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiong, S., Liu, Z., Zhang, X. et al. Resurgence of syphilis: focusing on emerging clinical strategies and preclinical models. J Transl Med 21, 917 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04685-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04685-4

Keywords