Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification of FCN1 as a novel macrophage infiltration-associated biomarker for diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 21, Article number: 203 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) has been steadily increasing globally. Delayed diagnosis of PIBD increases the risk of complications and contributes to growth retardation. To improve long-term outcomes, there is a pressing need to identify novel markers for early diagnosis of PIBD.

Methods

The candidate biomarkers for PIBD were identified from the GSE117993 dataset by two machine learning algorithms, namely LASSO and mSVM-RFE, and externally validated in the GSE126124 dataset and our PIBD cohort. The role of ficolin-1 (FCN1) in PIBD and its association with macrophage infiltration was investigated using the CIBERSORT method and enrichment analysis of the single-cell dataset GSE121380, and further validated using immunoblotting, qRT-PCR, and immunostaining in colon biopsies from PIBD patients, a juvenile murine DSS-induced colitis model, and THP-1-derived macrophages.

Results

FCN1 showed great diagnostic performance for PIBD in an independent clinical cohort with the AUC of 0.986. FCN1 expression was upregulated in both colorectal biopsies and blood samples from PIBD patients. Functionally, FCN1 was associated with immune-related processes in the colonic mucosa of PIBD patients, and correlated with increased proinflammatory M1 macrophage infiltration. Furthermore, single-cell transcriptome analysis and immunostaining revealed that FCN1 was almost exclusively expressed in macrophages infiltrating the colonic mucosa of PIBD patients, and these FCN1+ macrophages were related to hyper-inflammation. Notably, proinflammatory M1 macrophages derived from THP-1 expressed high levels of FCN1 and IL-1β, and FCN1 overexpression in THP-1-derived macrophages strongly promoted LPS-induced activation of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β via the NLRP3-caspase-1 axis.

Conclusions

FCN1 is a novel and promising diagnostic biomarker for PIBD. FCN1+ macrophages enriched in the colonic mucosa of PIBD exhibit proinflammatory phenotypes, and FCN1 promotes IL-1β maturation in macrophages via the NLRP3-caspase-1 axis.

Background

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are characterized by chronic immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence of IBD in pediatric populations is steadily increasing worldwide [1, 2]. Pediatric IBD (PIBD) often has an aggressive course and extensive disease distribution [3], and affects the growth and development of children [4, 5], which is different from adult IBD [6]. The clinical presentation of PIBD patients is variable, non-specific, and sometimes non-classical [5, 7], and therefore delays in diagnosis of PIBD are common [8]. Early diagnosis of PIBD is associated with improved long-term outcomes [9, 10]. An increasing number of biomarkers have been investigated to diagnose IBD [11], but there has been limited success in using these diagnostic markers in clinical practice. Fecal calprotectin is the most documented non-invasive marker for IBD [12, 13]. The use of fecal calprotectin in addition to symptoms improves the diagnostic accuracy of PIBD [14], but some PIBD patients have normal fecal calprotectin levels [15, 16]. Therefore, it is still necessary to identify novel useful markers for early diagnosis of PIBD.

Ficolins (FCNs) function as soluble pattern recognition molecules in the first line of host defense by sensing microorganisms and triggering complement activation via the lectin pathway. Three ficolins (FCN1, FCN2 and FCN3) have been characterized in humans, whereas only two ficolins (ficolin-A and ficolin-B) have been identified in mice [17]. Mouse ficolin-B (FCNB) is the homologue of human ficolin-1 (FCN1) [18]. Notably, FCN1 could bind to self-associated sialic acids, which may contribute to the development of autoimmunity [17, 19]. Accumulating evidence indicates the important role of ficolins in autoimmune diseases [20]. A previous study reported that FCN1 mRNA expression was upregulated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from adult IBD patients [21]. However, it is not yet fully elucidated the expression level of FCN1 in colorectal mucosa and peripheral blood of PIBD patients, and the underlying role of FCN1 in PIBD.

Intestinal mucosal immune cells including macrophages [22], dendritic cells [23], neutrophils [24], T cells [25] and B cells [26], are involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. However, a comprehensive large-sample analysis of colorectal immune cell infiltration in PIBD is still lacking, and the association between FCN1 expression and immune cell infiltration in PIBD mucosa remains elusive.

In this study, we identified FCN1 as a novel promising mucosal and circulating biomarker for PIBD diagnosis by performing machine learning-based biomarker screening analyses and external validation. We also found that FCN1 was upregulated and involved in immune-related processes in PIBD, and the correlation between FCN1 expression and proinflammatory macrophage infiltration in two bulk transcriptomic datasets and a single-cell dataset [27,28,29]. Key findings from the bioinformatics analyses were further corroborated in our PIBD clinical cohort and juvenile murine DSS-induced colitis model. Furthermore, we investigated the expression levels of FCN1 in macrophages of different phenotypes and the role of FCN1 in the IL-1β maturation by using THP-1-derived macrophages.

Methods

Identification of differentially expressed genes

RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data of rectal biopsies from PIBD and non-IBD pediatric patients was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number, GSE117993 [27]. Then, we followed the standard workflow of the ‘DESeq2’ package [30] in R software (version 4.0.4) to identify mucosal gene expression changes between 55 non-IBD controls and 75 PIBD patients. Differentially expressed genes were identified with adjusted P values less than 0.05 and Log2FoldChange absolute values greater than 2.

Potential biomarker discovery and validation

To identify the potential diagnostic biomarkers of PIBD among the differentially expressed genes, we implemented two machine learning algorithms, least absolute shrinkage and select options (LASSO) [31] logistic regression and multiple support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (mSVM-RFE) [32]. We first used the R package ‘glmnet’ (v4.1-1) [33] in for the LASSO logistic regression. Then, mSVM-RFE algorithm was performed by using the R package ‘e1071’ (v1.7-7) and the R implementation of this method available on GitHub (https://github.com/johncolby/SVM-RFE). Subsequently, the top-ranked biomarkers identified by the above two algorithms were entered into logistic regression models. After that, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was employed to assess the performance of these models based on the external validation dataset (GSE126124) [28]. The GSE126124 dataset consisted of gene expression microarray data of blood and colon samples from 59 PIBD patients and 39 non-IBD children, so we divided this dataset into two parts (blood and tissue) for validation.

Functional enrichment analysis

Differentially expressed genes identified above were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis using the R package ‘clusterProfiler’ (v3.16.1) [34]. The enriched GO terms were ranked by adjusted P values. Then, we calculated the frequency of FCN1-related GO terms in the top 100 enriched GO terms, which was visualized in a pie chart. Meanwhile, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) enrichment analysis was performed using the package ‘meshes’ (v1.14.0) [35] based on data source from ‘gene2pubmed’ and ‘C’ (Disease) category.

Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction

Differentially expressed genes identified above were uploaded to the search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins (STRING) (v11.5) database (https://string-db.org/) [36] for PPI network construction. Then, PPI network visualization was performed using Cytoscape (v3.7.2) [37], where node size depends on degree and edge size depends on combined score. To create a new subnetwork associated with FCN1 in Cytoscape, we first selected FCN1 and then performed the ‘From Selected Nodes, All Edges’ function in the ‘New Network’ function group.

Cell composition analysis of PIBD mucosal transcriptome data

To characterize the leukocyte composition of mucosal tissue, we downloaded the CIBERSORT [38] R script (v1.03) from ‘https://rdrr.io/github/singha53/amritr/src/R/supportFunc_cibersort.R’, and the leukocyte signature matrix (LM22) from ‘https://github.com/zomithex/CIBERSORT/blob/master/CIBERSORT_data/LM22.csv’. DESeq2-normalized read counts of GSE117993 [27] and normalized microarray data of GSE126124 [28] were taken as the input data for CIBERSORT analysis and Kruskal–Wallis test was used to evaluate the difference between two groups. Then, the R packages ‘ggplot2’ was used for visualization.

Analysis of PIBD single-cell RNA-seq data

Raw expression matrices of mucosal single-cell RNA-seq data from PIBD and control groups were downloaded under the accession number, GSE121380 [29]. Then, the integrated raw data was fed into the established workflow of the R package ‘Seurat’ (v4.0.2) [39]. Following the quality control procedure, cells with 200–5000 detected genes, cells with less than 40000 UMIs and cells with less than 15% UMIs from mitochondrial genes were kept for further analysis. The filtered matrix was processed in Seurat for normalization by using the default method ‘LogNormalize’, followed by dimension reduction. After that, cell clusters were annotated by using both the R package ‘SingleR’ (v1.6.1) [40] with the reference dataset ‘BlueprintEncodeData’ and the known marker genes. The marker genes of the major cell types include PTPRC (immune cells), CD79A (B cells), CD3E (T cells), CD68 (macrophages), EPCAM (epithelial cells), COL1A1 (fibroblasts) [29]. Next, macrophages with above-average FCN1 expression were defined as FCN1high macrophages, and the rest as FCN1low macrophages. To investigate the biological pathway activity in FCN1low and FCN1high macrophages, hallmark gene sets (v7.5.1) were downloaded from the Molecular Signatures Database (https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp), and then gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) [41] was performed by using the R package ‘GSEABase’. Intercellular communication network analysis was performed by using the standard workflow of the R package ‘CellChat’ (v1.4.0) [42].

Human samples

After diagnostic testing, the remaining tissue and blood samples from PIBD patients and non-IBD subjects were collected as our validation cohort. PBMCs were isolated from the whole blood by using Lymphoprep™ (1858, Serumwerk Bernburg) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Induction of colitis in mice

Three-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Phenotek Biotechnology (Shanghai) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. Ten mice were randomly assigned to two groups and allowed to acclimate for one week. Then, five mice were administrated by 3% (w/v) dextran sodium sulfate (DSS, MB5535, Meilunbio) solution in their water bottle for 7 consecutive days to induce colitis while 5 control mice received water without DSS. The body weight of each mouse was monitored daily. On the 8th day, the mice were sacrificed for further analysis [43, 44]. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Histopathology, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence

Samples were collected and immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Paraffin-embedded sections of biopsies were subjected to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining. Primary antibodies for section staining included: FCN1 (10930-R017, Sino Biological), CD68 (97778 s, CST).

Quantitative PCR

Total RNA was isolated using RNAex Pro reagent (AG21102, Accurate Biotechnology) and converted to complement DNA using Evo M-MLV. RT Kit (AG11711, Accurate Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR was performed using the SYBR® Green Premix Pro Taq HS qPCR Kit (AG11718, Accurate Biotechnology). Gene expression levels were normalized to B2M or Gapdh in human or mouse samples, and evaluated using the 2−∆∆Ct method. The primers used are listed in Additional file 4: Table S3.

Cell culture and transfection

Human monocyte-like cell line (THP-1) was cultured with RPMI-1640 containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 air atmosphere. THP-1 cells were differentiated into M0 macrophages after 48 h exposure to 100 ng/ml PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, S1819, Beyotime), and then polarized towards M1 phenotype by incubation with 100 ng/ml LPS (L2880, Sigma) and 20 ng/ml IFN-γ (11725-HNAS, Sino Biological) or towards M2 phenotype by incubation with 20 ng/ml IL-4 (11846-HNAE, Sino Biological) and 20 ng/ml IL-13 (10369-HNAC, Sino Biological) for 48 h [45]. To determine the effect of FCN1 overexpression in macrophages, THP-1 cells were transfected with pCMV3-FCN1-C-His (HG10930-CH, Sino Biological) or pCMV3-C-His control vectors (CV015, Sino Biological) using Lipofectamine 2000 (11668-019, Invitrogen) in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes for 24 h as previously reported [46]. After transfection, THP-1 cells were then transferred into a 12-well plate and cultured with fresh medium containing 100 ng/ml PMA for 24 h. These cells were then cultured with or without 100 ng/ml LPS for 2 h.

Western blot

Protein was extracted from murine tissues and THP-1-derived macrophages of different phenotypes for western blot. The blots were probed with antibodies against IL-6 (DF6087, Affinity Bioscience), FCN1 (10930-R017, Sino Biological), IL-1β (12242S, CST), GAPDH (GB12002, Servicebio), β-actin (GB12001, Servicebio), caspase-1 (3866S, CST), cleaved caspase-1 (4199S, CST), and NLRP3 (15101S, CST).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using R software (version 4.0.4). Detailed descriptions of statistical tests are provided in the corresponding bioinformatics methods and Figure Legends.

Results

Identification of FCN1 as a candidate biomarker for PIBD diagnosis

The mucosal expression profiles of 75 PIBD and 55 non-IBD pediatric patients from the GSE117993 dataset [27] were analyzed to identify disease-specific markers of PIBD. A total of 373 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PIBD and non-IBD were subjected to marker selection by using least absolute shrinkage and select options (LASSO) [31] and multiple support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (mSVM-RFE)[32] algorithms (Fig. 1A, B, Additional file 1: Table. S1). The LASSO algorithm identified 16 genes from DEGs as diagnostic markers for PIBD by applying the lambda of minimum mean error; the mSVM-RFE algorithm identified 6 markers as top features of PIBD with a low error rate (Fig. 1C, D). Then, we obtained two overlapping markers, FCN1 and LINC01558, from these two algorithms (Fig. 1E). The diagnostic efficacy of FCN1 and LINC01558 was further validated in an independent PIBD dataset (GSE126124) [28], which consisted of the expression profiles of 78 colon biopsies and 98 peripheral whole blood samples. As shown in Fig. 1F, G, FCN1 showed great diagnostic efficacy in both colon and blood validation sets with area under the curves (AUC) values of 0.937 and 0.743, respectively. In contrast, LINC01558 did not achieve good diagnostic performance in the colon and blood validation datasets (AUCs, 0.576 and 0.363). Taken together, the above results indicate that FCN1 may be a good mucosal and circulating biomarker for the diagnosis of PIBD.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Identification of FCN1 as a candidate biomarker for PIBD diagnosis. A Overall workflow for construction and external validation of the diagnostic model. B Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between PIBD and non-IBD rectal biopsy samples of GSE117993. Genes with adjusted P < 0.05 and |log2(Fold Change)|> 2 are considered as DEGs, and these DEGs are listed in Table S1. C LASSO logistic regression algorithm for biomarker selection. D mSVM-RFE algorithm for biomarker selection. E Venn diagram visualizing the overlap of selected markers between two algorithms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the corresponding area under the curves (AUCs) of diagnostic prediction models based on FCN1 and LINC01558 in the colon F and blood G validation datasets (GSE126124)

Full size image

FCN1 is upregulated in PIBD and associated with immune response

The expression level and the underlying role of FCN1 in PIBD remain largely unknown. Using the public RNA-seq dataset (GSE117993), we found that the expression of FCN1 in rectal biopsies from PIBD patients was significantly higher than in non-IBD controls (Fig. 2A). Consistently, in an independent PIBD microarray dataset (GSE126124), we further confirmed that FCN1 expression was increased in both colon biopsies and peripheral whole blood samples from PIBD patients compared with non-IBD subjects (Fig. 2B, C). In addition, DEGs between PIBD and non-IBD identified from the above dataset were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) enrichment analysis. The results of GO analysis clearly showed that FCN1 had a high frequency (31%) in the top 100 enriched GO terms. Among the top 10 significantly enriched pathways, FCN1 was involved in humoral immune response, complement activation and phagocytosis (Fig. 2D). The MeSH term enrichment analysis in Fig. 2E showed that FCN1 was closely associated with infection and inflammation. These results suggest that FCN1 is upregulated and associated with immune response in PIBD.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FCN1 is upregulated in PIBD and associated with immune response. A The expression level of FCN1 in the rectal biopsies from PIBD and non-IBD subjects of the GSE117993 RNA-seq dataset. The y axis represents log2-scaled normalized counts by applying the regularized log (rlog) algorithm in DESeq2. Upregulated FCN1 expression in the colon B and peripheral whole blood (C) from PIBD and non-IBD subjects of the GSE126124 microarray dataset. The y axis represents log2-scaled normalized gene expression by using the robust multichip average (RMA) algorithm. Unpaired t test was employed to calculate P values. D GO enrichment analysis of DEGs between PIBD and non-IBD subjects. The bar plot exhibits significantly enriched GO terms and the pie chart shows the frequency of FCN1 involved in top 100 enriched GO terms. E The bar plot of significantly enriched FCN1-related MeSH terms of DEGs in PIBD compared with non-IBD subjects. F The protein-protein interaction subnetwork of DEGs associated with FCN1 based on STRING database. G The heatmap visualizing the relative expression of FCN1-associated genes in the GSE117993 dataset. H ROC curves and their corresponding AUCs of FCN1, S100A8 and S100A9 (subunits of calprotectin) in the colon validation datasets

Full size image

The mucosal-based diagnostic performance of FCN1 for PIBD is superior to calprotectin

To identify FCN1-related genes from DEGs between PIBD and non-IBD, we performed protein–protein interaction analysis. Among the 14 identified FCN1-related genes (Fig. 2F), S100A8 and S100A9 are the components of calprotectin [47]. Similar to FCN1, the expression of S100A8, S100A9 and other FCN1-related genes were all upregulated in PIBD mucosa compared to non-IBD mucosa (Fig. 2G). Since fecal calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9) is a useful screening biomarker for PIBD diagnosis in clinical practice [12, 13, 16], we compared the diagnostic efficacy of FCN1 with that of S100A8 and S100A9 to determine the potential clinical value of FCN1. In the colon validation set, S100A8 and S100A9 showed efficient diagnostic performance in PIBD, yielding AUCs of 0.920 and 0.877 respectively. Notably, FCN1 demonstrated superior performance for PIBD diagnosis as compared to S100A8 and S100A9 (Fig. 2H). These results further support the potential clinical value of FCN1 in PIBD diagnosis.

FCN1 expression positively correlates with M0/M1 macrophage infiltration

Immune cells play a critical role in IBD pathogenesis. To identify changes in the immune cell composition of PIBD mucosa, we applied digital cytometry analysis (CIBERSORT) [38] to mucosal expression profiles from the GSE117993 dataset. We found that the immune cell landscape was altered in PIBD rectal mucosa compared to non-IBD controls, including macrophages, mast cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils, T cells and B cells (Fig. 3A–F, Additional file 2: Fig. S1A). Among them, the inferred mucosal abundance of M0 and M1 macrophages was significantly increased, while the abundance of M2 macrophages was decreased in PIBD compared to non-IBD (Fig. 3A). Both resting mast cells and resting dendritic cells were decreased in PIBD, whereas their activated forms were increased, although not reaching statistical significance (Fig. 3B, C). The abundance of infiltrating neutrophils, activated CD4 memory T cells and plasma cells in PIBD were significantly higher than in controls, whereas abundance of CD8 T cells, naïve B cells and memory B cells were lower in PIBD (Fig. 3D–F). Similar changes in immune cell composition were also observed in another PIBD cohort (GSE126124, Additional file 2: Fig. S1B, S2A–F).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Positive correlation between FCN1 expression and M0/M1 macrophage infiltration. CIBERSORT inferred abundance of macrophages A, mast cells B, dendritic cells C, neutrophils D, T cells E and B cells F in rectal biopsies from PIBD and non-IBD subjects (GSE117993). Kruskal–Wallis test was employed to calculate P values. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. G Spearman correlations between FCN1 expression and CIBERSORT inferred abundance of infiltrating immune cells. Dot size is proportional to strength of correlation and dot color indicates significance of correlation coefficient (significant positive correlation with Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05: red, significant negative correlation: blue, otherwise gray). **** denotes Bonferroni corrected P < 0.0001. H Scatter plots of the tissue expression of FCN1 and CIBERSORT inferred abundance of macrophage subsets (M0, M1, M2) in the GSE117993 cohort. The 95% confidence intervals for the correlation between FCN1 expression and macrophages are (0.66, 0.81) for M0, (0.61, 0.79) for M1, and (-0.72, -0.51) for M2

Full size image

To investigate the association between FCN1 expression and immune cell infiltration, we performed Spearman’s correlation analysis. The strongest correlations were found between FCN1 expression and macrophage subsets, including M0, M1 and M2 states (Fig. 3G). As shown in Fig. 3H, FCN1 expression was positively correlated with the CIBERSORT inferred abundance of M0 macrophages (Spearman’s r = 0.75, P = 2.6 × 10–24) and M1 macrophages (Spearman’s r = 0.71, P = 3.3 × 10–21), but negatively correlated with M2-macrophage abundance (Spearman’s r = −0.62, P = 2.5 × 10–15) in the GSE117993 PIBD cohort. These correlations between FCN1 and inferred macrophage subsets were further corroborated in an additional PIBD cohort (GSE126124, Additional file 2: Fig. S2G).

FCN1 is enriched in macrophages of PIBD colon mucosa and related to hyper-inflammation

To further investigate the association between FCN1 expression and macrophage polarization states, we analyzed a single-cell transcriptomic dataset of colon biopsies from non-IBD and PIBD (GSE121380) [29] (Fig. 4A, see Additional file 2: Fig. S3 for cell cluster annotation). FCN1 was almost expressed in CD68+ macrophages, and the expression levels of FCN1 and IL1B in macrophages of colon biopsies from PIBD were significantly increased compared to those from non-IBD (Fig. 4B, Additional file 2: Fig. S4). In comparison with FCN1low macrophages, several of the top 10 upregulated gene sets in FCN1high macrophages were related to hyper-inflammation, such as TNFα signaling via NF-κB, inflammatory response, interferon gamma response, complement and IL-6 signaling (Fig. 4C–E, Additional file 2: Fig. S5, Additional file 3: Table S2). The classical M1 macrophages are generally characterized by pro-inflammatory responses and high expression of TNF, IL-1, IL6, and interferon-induced genes [48,49,50], suggesting that FCN1+ macrophages enriched in PIBD mucosa are similar to pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FCN1 is enriched in macrophages of PIBD colon mucosa and related to hyper-inflammation. A Diagram depicting the analysis scheme of public single-cell RNA sequencing data (GSE121380). B t-SNE plots of CD68 (macrophage marker), FCN1 and IL1B at the single-cell level. C The bar plot of significantly enriched GSEA Hallmark pathways in FCN1high macrophages compared with FCN1low macrophages. D The enrichment plot of TNFα Signaling via NF-κB pathway. E Heatmaps of FCN1 and the top 15 up-regulated genes of TNFα Signaling via NF-κB pathway in FCN1high compared with FCN1low macrophages. F The heatmap showing the overall outgoing signaling patterns of major cell types, including B cells, epithelial cells, FCN1low macrophages, FCN1high macrophages, fibroblasts, and T cells, as predicted by CellChat. G-J Heatmaps of differential signaling networks between FCN1low macrophages and FCN1high macrophages, including MIF signaling, ICAM signaling, CCL signaling, and BAFF signaling

Full size image

We then applied CellChat [42] to decipher the intercellular signaling networks in PIBD colon mucosa. Interestingly, we found many differential proinflammatory signaling networks between FCN1low/FCN1high macrophages and other major cell types, such as pathways related to macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM), CC chemokine ligands (CCL), and B cell activating factor (BAFF) (Fig. 4F). Compared to FCN1low macrophages, FCN1high macrophages received more signals through the MIF signaling pathway from B cells, fibroblasts, and T cells (Fig. 4G). Notably, FCN1high macrophages also exhibited increased autocrine ICAM and CCL signaling relative to FCN1low macrophages (Fig. 4H, I). In addition, FCN1high macrophages were the major ligand sources of BAFF signaling targeting B cells (Fig. 4J). These observations support that the FCN1high macrophages enriched in PIBD colonic mucosa contribute to mucosal inflammation.

FCN1 demonstrates superior diagnostic performance in the PIBD clinical cohort

Consistent with the findings of the PIBD single-cell transcriptome analysis, the immunostaining results showed that FCN1 expression was remarkably increased in colon biopsies from PIBD patients compared to non-IBD controls (Fig. 5A), and FCN1 was specifically colocalized with CD68+ macrophages in PIBD colon biopsies (Fig. 5B). Considering that macrophages in the intestinal mucosa are continuously renewed by circulating monocytes [51], we hypothesized that the isolation of PBMCs from whole blood samples might improve the blood-based diagnostic performance of FCN1, since PBMCs contain a higher percentage of monocytes than whole blood. In our cohort, the mRNA expression levels of FCN1, S100A8, and S100A9 was significantly higher in PBMCs from PIBD patients than from non-IBD controls, but LINC01558 expression was not different between two groups (Fig. 5C–F). As expected, S100A8 and S100A9 showed efficient diagnostic performance in PIBD, whereas LINC01558 did not perform well, yielding AUCs of 0.843, 0.929, and 0.314, respectively. Notably, FCN1 still showed the best sensitivity and specificity to discriminate PIBD patients from non-IBD controls in our validation cohort with the AUC of 0.986 (Fig. 5G). Collectively, these results further indicate that FCN1 is a promising biomarker for PIBD diagnosis (Fig. 5H).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Validation of the diagnostic efficacy of FCN1 in our patient cohort. A Immunohistochemistry staining showing increased infiltration of FCN1+ cells in colon biopsies of IBD compared with non-IBD subjects. B Immunofluorescence staining showing that FCN1+ cells (red) colocalize with CD68+ cells (green) in the colon biopsies of children with IBD. Yellow indicates double positive cells. C-F Relative mRNA expression levels of FCN1, LINC10558, S100A8, and S100A9 in PBMCs from our validation cohort were measured by qRT-PCR. Data represent mean ± SD. Unpaired t test was employed to calculate P values. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001. G ROC curves and their corresponding AUCs of FCN1, LINC01558, S100A8, and S100A9 based on relative mRNA expression levels in PBMCs from our validation cohort. H Based on PBMCs isolated from whole blood, FCN1 showed superior sensitivity and specificity for discriminating PIBD patients from non-IBD controls in our validation cohort

Full size image

Expression of FCNB is upregulated in blood, colon, and spleen in murine colitis model

Our above results suggest that FCN1 expression was increased in both colorectal mucosa, blood, and PBMCs of PIBD patients. Therefore, we further determined involvement of FCN1 in PIBD using DSS-induced murine colitis model (Fig. 6A). Compared with the control group, four-week-old mice exposed to DSS exhibited loss of body weight, a significant decrease in colon length and enlargement of spleen (Fig. 6B–D). Colitis in DSS-treated mice was ascertained by histopathological analysis of epithelial degeneration and immune cell infiltration (Fig. 6E). Mouse FCNB resembles human FCN1 [18]. Consistent with the findings in human PIBD, the mRNA expression of Fcnb was obviously increased in peripheral whole blood of mice with DSS-induced colitis (Fig. 6F), and the protein levels of FCNB were also increased in the colon and spleen tissues of mice with DSS-induced colitis (Fig. 6G, H).

Fig. 6
figure 6

FCNB expression is upregulated and colocalized with CD68 in murine colitis model. A Schematic of the animal experiment design. Four-week-old C57BL/6 mice were treated with 3% DSS in drinking water for 7 days to induce colitis, while the control group received water. On the 8th day, mice were sacrificed for further analysis. B Mice with DSS-induced colitis showed significantly decreased body weight compared with the control mice. C Colon lengths were measured 8 days after DSS treatment. D Gross pictures of spleens and spleen index (%). Spleen index (%) is the ratio of spleen weight to body weight. E Representative H&E-stained colon tissue sections of control and colitis groups. Scale bars, 50 μM. F The mRNA expression levels of Fcnb (the murine homologue gene of human FCN1) in peripheral whole blood from control and colitis groups were measured by qRT-PCR. The protein expression levels of FCNB and IL-1β in colon G and spleen H were measured by Western blotting. β-actin was used as a loading control. I Immunohistochemistry staining of FCNB in colon of mice. Scale bars, 20 μM. J Immunofluorescence staining showing that FCNB+ cells (red) colocalize with CD68+cells (green) in the colon from mice with DSS-induced colitis. Yellow indicates double positive cells. Scale bars, 20 μM. Data represent mean ± SD. Unpaired t test was used to calculate P values. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001

Full size image

Increased expression of FCNB is associated with inflammatory macrophage infiltration in the colon mucosa of mice with colitis

Given that FCN1+ macrophage infiltration was increased in human PIBD mucosa, and FCN1high macrophages had high expression of IL-1β, we then investigated whether there was an association between FCNB (the murine homologue of human FCN1) and IL-1β in the mouse model of colitis. As expected, the expression of IL-1β was markedly upregulated in colon and spleen tissues from mice with colitis compared to the control group, and tissues with high expression of FCNB also showed higher IL-1β expression (Fig. 6G, H), suggesting the association between FCNB and IL-1β. In addition, increased FCNB+ cell infiltration was detected in the colon tissues of mice with DSS-induced colitis when compared to the control group, which was consistent with the findings in human PIBD (Fig. 6I). More importantly, FCNB was specifically colocalized with CD68+ macrophages recruited into the colon of mice with colitis (Fig. 6J). Taken together, these results indicate that increased FCNB expression is associated with proinflammatory macrophage infiltration in the colon mucosa of mice with colitis.

FCN1 promotes caspase-1-mediated IL-1β maturation in macrophages

To further investigate whether changes in macrophage phenotype are associated with FCN1 expression, THP-1-derived M0, M1, and M2 macrophages were generated (Fig. 7A). Compared with M0 macrophages, M1 polarized macrophages exhibited upregulated expression of FCN1 and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, pro-IL-1β, and cleaved-IL-1β, whereas M2 polarized macrophages exhibited downregulated expression of FCN1 and the pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 7B).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Increased FCN1+ macrophage infiltration promotes intestinal inflammation in PIBD. A Diagram showing the standardized methods to induce the differentiation of THP-1 cells into M0, M1 and M2 type populations of macrophages. B Western blot analysis of M0, M1 and M2 macrophages derived from THP-1 cells. C Diagram of transfection and stimulation of THP-1 cells. D Western blot analysis of THP-1 cells with different treatments as described in C. FCN1-OE: FCN1-overexpression. E The mechanistic diagram of FCN1 function in PIBD. FCN1+ macrophage infiltration is increased in the colonic mucosa of PIBD. Impaired intestinal mucosal barrier in PIBD leads to translocation of bacteria and bacterial components such as LPS, and FCN1+ macrophages are exposed to LPS. Macrophage FCN1 promotes LPS-induced activation of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β via NLRP3-dependent cleavage of caspase-1, resulting in increased intestinal inflammation

Full size image

The proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β was mainly derived from macrophages and its biological activation typically requires NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 cleavage [52]. Given the observed association between the expression of FCN1 and IL-1β, we questioned whether FCN1 could regulate IL-1β activation. To address this, we overexpressed FCN1 in THP-1-derived macrophages, and found that overexpression of FCN1 slightly increased the protein levels of NLRP3, cleaved caspase-1 and mature IL-1β (Fig. 7C, D). Considering the defective intestinal mucosal barrier and the increased systemic exposure to gut-derived endotoxin (LPS) in patients with PIBD [53, 54], we then exposed THP-1-derived macrophages to LPS. Interestingly, in the presence of LPS, overexpression of FCN1 increased the NLRP3 expression, and greatly upregulated the protein levels of cleaved caspase-1 and mature IL-1β (Fig. 7C, D). Consistently, in the presence of LPS, human recombinant FCN1 protein (rhFCN1) could also increase the protein levels of NLRP3, cleaved caspase-1, and IL-1β (Additional file 2: Fig. S6).

Overall, infiltration of FCN1+ macrophages are increased in the colon mucosa of PIBD, and macrophage FCN1 promotes the production of mature IL-1β via NLRP3-dependent cleavage of caspase-1, which contributes to the intestinal inflammation (Fig. 7E).

Discussion

FCN1 is a member of the soluble pattern recognition molecules that plays an essential role in complement activation through the lectin pathway [55]. Hyperactivation of complement may underlie chronic inflammatory diseases, such as IBD [56]. In this study, we identified FCN1 as a novel promising mucosal and circulating biomarker, which could accurately discriminate PIBD patients from non-IBD children. Notably, FCN1 showed great blood-based performance for PIBD discrimination in our clinical validation cohort, with the AUC of 0.986. The expression of FCN1 was significantly increased in both colorectal biopsies and blood of PIBD compared to non-IBD in both public bulk transcriptomic datasets and our clinical cohort, which was further validated in the mouse model of DSS-induced colitis.

We also observed the association of FCN1 with S100A8 and S100A9, which are the components of calprotectin [47]. Fecal calprotectin (S100A8/S100A9), leaking from inflamed mucosa of IBD, has been the most recorded biomarker of intestinal inflammation [12, 13], and is useful for PIBD diagnosis in clinical practice [14, 16]. Our results highlighted that the mucosal and blood-based diagnostic performance of FCN1 in IBD was superior to that of S100A8 and S100A9, further supporting the potential clinical value of FCN1 in PIBD diagnosis. It is worth further exploring whether fecal FCN1 could serve as a diagnostic biomarker for PIBD, as elevated mucosal FCN1 may leak into the lumen together with calprotectin and be subsequently excreted in the feces.

Dysfunction of the innate and adaptive immune systems is considered as an important pathogenetic factor of IBD. For instance, the expansion of IgG+ plasma cells with reduced diversity and maturation [57], as well as increased activated Th17 cells but decreased CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells and Treg cells [58] were detected in inflamed IBD mucosa, which might exacerbate inflammation; additionally, the myeloid cell populations such as altered immature macrophages were accumulated in the inflamed colon of IBD patients, where these cells produced excessive inflammatory cytokines and aggravated epithelial damage [22].

In our study, we demonstrated the altered immune cell landscape in the PIBD mucosa, which is consistent with the findings of previous work. Among them, the inferred mucosal abundance of M0/M1 macrophages is significantly increased in PIBD compared to non-IBD individuals, and the upregulation of FCN1 correlates with the increase of M0/M1 macrophages based on the bulk transcriptomes. We also found high FCN1 expression in M1-like macrophage populations in the PIBD single-cell transcriptomic data and confirmed the expansion of FCN1+ macrophages in both PIBD patients and mouse models. The high expression level of FCN1 in M1 macrophages suggests that it may play an additional role in the inflammatory response.

In addition to complement activation, FCN1 could dock onto the transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 43 to sense pathogens and trigger intracellular signaling to regulate host defense [59]. It has also been reported that FCN1 binds to specific lymphocyte subsets such as activated T cells, via sialic acids on the cell surface [19]. However, far too little attention has been paid to the detailed mechanisms of FCN1 in autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases in the past few decades [20]. Most previous studies have only focused on the aberrant expression of FCN1 in some autoimmune diseases [60,61,62] and its correlation with disease activity [63,64,65].

In our study, we found the association between the expression of FCN1 and IL-1β both in vivo and in vitro, indicating that FCN1 may be involved in the maturation of IL-1β. IL-1β is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a critical role in inflammatory disorders [66] and is typically regulated by the NLRP3-caspase-1 axis [52]. Our findings suggest that upregulated FCN1 expression in macrophages slightly promoted the expression of NLRP3, cleavage of caspase-1 and subsequent activation of IL-1β. Impaired intestinal mucosal barrier in PIBD leads to increased systemic exposure to gut microbiota-derived LPS [53, 54]. We observed that in the presence of LPS, overexpression of FCN1 in macrophages greatly enhanced caspase-1 cleavage, resulting in significantly increased production of mature IL-1β, which promotes the intestinal inflammation. It was previously reported that anti-FCN1 monoclonal antibody could alleviate experimental arthritis in the mouse model [67]. Similarly, targeting FCN1+ macrophages may help alleviate the intestinal inflammation in PIBD patients. Future studies are needed to investigate precisely how FCN1 facilitates LPS-induced IL-1β activation via the NLRP3-caspase-1 axis, and the potential of FCN1 as a therapeutic target for IBD.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study has demonstrated that FCN1 is a novel promising mucosal and circulating biomarker for PIBD diagnosis. Macrophages expressing FCN1, which are enriched in PIBD mucosa, exhibit proinflammatory phenotypes. Moreover, FCN1 greatly promotes LPS-induced activation of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β via NLRP3-dependent cleavage of caspase-1 in macrophages. Therefore, targeting FCN1+ macrophages may help alleviate the intestinal inflammation in PIBD patients.

Availability of data and materials

Publicly available datasets analyzed in this study were downloaded from GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession numbers: GSE117993, GSE126124, GSE121380.

Abbreviations

FCN1:

Ficolin-1

FCNB:

Ficolin-B

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel diseases

PIBD:

Pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

RNA-seq:

RNA-sequencing

GEO:

Gene expression omnibus

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and select options

mSVM-RFE:

Multiple support vector machine-recursive feature elimination

AUC:

Area under the ROC curve

GO:

Gene ontology

MeSH:

Medical subject headings

PPI:

Protein-protein interaction

IL1B:

Interleukin 1β

GSEA:

Gene set enrichment analysis

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

DSS:

Dextran sulfate sodium

MIF:

Macrophage migration inhibitory factor

ICAM:

Intercellular adhesion molecules

CCL:

CC chemokine ligands

BAFF:

B cell activating factor

Casp-1:

Caspase-1

rhFCN1:

Human recombinant FCN1 protein

References

  1. Sykora J, Pomahacova R, Kreslova M, Cvalinova D, Stych P, Schwarz J. Current global trends in the incidence of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(25):2741–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kuenzig ME, Fung SG, Marderfeld L, Mak JWY, Kaplan GG, Ng SC, et al. Twenty-first century trends in the global epidemiology of pediatric-onset inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(4):1147-59e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dabritz J, Gerner P, Enninger A, Classen M, Radke M. Inflammatory bowel disease in childhood and adolescence. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(19):331–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Oliveira SB, Monteiro IM. Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease in children. BMJ. 2017;357:j2083.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Conrad MA, Rosh JR. Pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017;64(3):577–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carroll MW, Kuenzig ME, Mack DR, Otley AR, Griffiths AM, Kaplan GG, et al. The impact of inflammatory bowel disease in canada 2018: children and adolescents with IBD. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2019;2(Suppl 1):S49–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen MJ, Dhawan A, Saeed SA. Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(11):1053–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajbar A, Cross E, Matoi S, Hay CA, Baines LM, Saunders B, et al. Diagnostic delay in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07452-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sulkanen E, Repo M, Huhtala H, Hiltunen P, Kurppa K. Impact of diagnostic delay to the clinical presentation and associated factors in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):364.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ricciuto A, Mack DR, Huynh HQ, Jacobson K, Otley AR, deBruyn J, et al. Diagnostic delay is associated with complicated disease and growth impairment in paediatric Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2021;15(3):419–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang H, Zeng Z, Mukherjee A, Shen B. Molecular diagnosis and classification of inflammatory bowel disease. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2018;18(10):867–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walsham NE, Sherwood RA. Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2016;9:21–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Manceau H, Chicha-Cattoir V, Puy H, Peoc’h K. Fecal calprotectin in inflammatory bowel diseases: update and perspectives. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(4):474–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holtman GA, Lisman-van Leeuwen Y, Day AS, Fagerberg UL, Henderson P, Leach ST, et al. Use of laboratory markers in addition to symptoms for diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(10):984–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaoul R, Sladek M, Turner D, Paeregaard A, Veres G, Wauters GV, et al. Limitations of fecal calprotectin at diagnosis in untreated pediatric Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18(8):1493–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho SSC, Ross M, Keenan JI, Day AS. Fecal calprotectin in combination with standard blood tests in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease in children. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:609279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Endo Y, Matsushita M, Fujita T. New insights into the role of ficolins in the lectin pathway of innate immunity. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2015;316:49–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Runza VL, Hehlgans T, Echtenacher B, Zahringer U, Schwaeble WJ, Mannel DN. Localization of the mouse defense lectin ficolin B in lysosomes of activated macrophages. J Endotoxin Res. 2006;12(2):120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Genster N, Ma YJ, Munthe-Fog L, Garred P. The pattern recognition molecule ficolin-1 exhibits differential binding to lymphocyte subsets, providing a novel link between innate and adaptive immunity. Mol Immunol. 2014;57(2):181–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. fWang P, Wu Q, Shuai ZW. Emerging role of ficolins in autoimmune diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2021;163:105266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bovin LF, Brynskov J, Hegedus L, Jess T, Nielsen CH, Bendtzen K. Gene expression profiling in autoimmune diseases: chronic inflammation or disease specific patterns? Autoimmunity. 2007;40(3):191–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Na YR, Stakenborg M, Seok SH, Matteoli G. Macrophages in intestinal inflammation and resolution: a potential therapeutic target in IBD. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(9):531–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinbach EC, Plevy SE. The role of macrophages and dendritic cells in the initiation of inflammation in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(1):166–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou GX, Liu ZJ. Potential roles of neutrophils in regulating intestinal mucosal inflammation of inflammatory bowel disease. J Dig Dis. 2017;18(9):495–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tindemans I, Joosse ME, Samsom JN. Dissecting the Heterogeneity in T-Cell Mediated Inflammation in IBD. Cells. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9010110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Castro-Dopico T, Colombel JF, Mehandru S. Targeting B cells for inflammatory bowel disease treatment: back to the future. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2020;55:90–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Haberman Y, Karns R, Dexheimer PJ, Schirmer M, Somekh J, Jurickova I, et al. Ulcerative colitis mucosal transcriptomes reveal mitochondriopathy and personalized mechanisms underlying disease severity and treatment response. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer NP, Silvester JA, Lee JJ, Beam AL, Fried I, Valtchinov VI, et al. Concordance between gene expression in peripheral whole blood and colonic tissue in children with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(10):e0222952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang B, Chen Z, Geng L, Wang J, Liang H, Cao Y, et al. Mucosal profiling of pediatric-onset colitis and IBD reveals common pathogenics and therapeutic pathways. Cell. 2019;179(5):1160–7624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1996;58(1):267–88.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Duan KB, Rajapakse JC, Wang H, Azuaje F. Multiple SVM-RFE for gene selection in cancer classification with expression data. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2005;4(3):228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Yu G. Using meshes for MeSH term enrichment and semantic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(21):3766–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D605–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):453–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, Mauck WM 3rd, Zheng S, Butler A, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573-87e29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Aran D, Looney AP, Liu L, Wu E, Fong V, Hsu A, et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):163–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jin S, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Zhang L, Chang I, Ramos R, Kuan CH, et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using Cell Chat. Nature Commun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, Vijay-Kumar M. Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in mice. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wirtz S, Popp V, Kindermann M, Gerlach K, Weigmann B, Fichtner-Feigl S, et al. Chemically induced mouse models of acute and chronic intestinal inflammation. Nat Protoc. 2017;12(7):1295–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tedesco S, De Majo F, Kim J, Trenti A, Trevisi L, Fadini GP, et al. Convenience versus biological significance: are PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells a reliable substitute for blood-derived macrophages when studying in vitro polarization? Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tang X, Aljahdali B, Alasiri M, Bamashmous A, Cao F, Dibart S, et al. A method for high transfection efficiency in THP-1 suspension cells without PMA treatment. Anal Biochem. 2018;544:93–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hood MI, Skaar EP. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(8):525–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Murray Peter J, Allen Judith E, Biswas Subhra K, Fisher Edward A, Gilroy Derek W, Goerdt S, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yunna C, Mengru H, Lei W, Weidong C. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization. Eur J Pharmacol. 2020;877:173090.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ivashkiv LB. Epigenetic regulation of macrophage polarization and function. Trends Immunol. 2013;34(5):216–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ginhoux F, Jung S. Monocytes and macrophages: developmental pathways and tissue homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(6):392–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 2016;165(4):792–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Odenwald MA, Turner JR. The intestinal epithelial barrier: a therapeutic target? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(1):9–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pasternak BA, D’Mello S, Jurickova II, Han X, Willson T, Flick L, et al. Lipopolysaccharide exposure is linked to activation of the acute phase response and growth failure in pediatric Crohn’s disease and murine colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(5):856–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Matsushita M. Ficolins in complement activation. Mol Immunol. 2013;55(1):22–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jain U, Otley AR, Van Limbergen J, Stadnyk AW. The complement system in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(9):1628–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Uzzan M, Martin JC, Mesin L, Livanos AE, Castro-Dopico T, Huang R, et al. Ulcerative colitis is characterized by a plasmablast-skewed humoral response associated with disease activity. Nat Med. 2022;28(4):766–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Jaeger N, Gamini R, Cella M, Schettini JL, Bugatti M, Zhao S, et al. Single-cell analyses of Crohn’s disease tissues reveal intestinal intraepithelial T cells heterogeneity and altered subset distributions. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1921.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang J, Yang L, Ang Z, Yoong SL, Tran TT, Anand GS, et al. Secreted M-ficolin anchors onto monocyte transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 43 and cross talks with plasma C-reactive protein to mediate immune signaling and regulate host defense. J Immunol. 2010;185(11):6899–910.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Troldborg A, Thiel S, Jensen L, Hansen S, Laska MJ, Deleuran B, et al. Collectin liver 1 and collectin kidney 1 and other complement-associated pattern recognition molecules in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2015;182(2):132–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Ammitzboll CG, Thiel S, Ellingsen T, Deleuran B, Jorgensen A, Jensenius JC, et al. Levels of lectin pathway proteins in plasma and synovial fluid of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32(5):1457–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Medjeral-Thomas NR, Troldborg A, Constantinou N, Lomax-Browne HJ, Hansen AG, Willicombe M, et al. Progressive IgA nephropathy is associated with low circulating Mannan-binding lectin-associated serine protease-3 (MASP-3) and increased glomerular factor H-related protein-5 (FHR5) deposition. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3(2):426–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Hein E, Nielsen LA, Nielsen CT, Munthe-Fog L, Skjoedt MO, Jacobsen S, et al. Ficolins and the lectin pathway of complement in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Mol Immunol. 2015;63(2):209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Tanha N, Pilely K, Faurschou M, Garred P, Jacobsen S. Plasma ficolin levels and risk of nephritis in Danish patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36(2):335–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ammitzboll CG, Thiel S, Jensenius JC, Ellingsen T, Horslev-Petersen K, Hetland ML, et al. M-ficolin levels reflect disease activity and predict remission in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65(12):3045–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Church LD, Cook GP, McDermott MF. Primer: inflammasomes and interleukin 1β in inflammatory disorders. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008;4(1):34–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Katayama M, Ota K, Nagi-Miura N, Ohno N, Yabuta N, Nojima H, et al. Ficolin-1 is a promising therapeutic target for autoimmune diseases. Int Immunol. 2019;31(1):23–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Jianming Zeng (University of Macau) and his bioinformatics team for generously sharing their experience and codes.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20319, 82071691, 81872395), Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province (2022AAC02027) and Scientific research project of Ningxia Medical University (XZ2020006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Ruijin Er Rd.197, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Xixi Chen, Yuanqi Gao, Jinfang Xie, Huiying Hua, Chun Pan, Jiebin Huang, Mengxia Jing, Xuehua Chen, Chundi Xu & Pu Li

  2. NHC Key Laboratory of Metabolic Cardiovascular Diseases Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Yujing Gao

Authors
  1. Xixi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanqi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jinfang Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huiying Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chun Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiebin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mengxia Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xuehua Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Chundi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yujing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PL, CDX and YJG designed the project. XXC performed the bioinformatic experiments. XXC, YQG and JFX performed the experiments. YQG, HYH and CP contributed to the collection of clinical samples. XHC, JBH and MXJ contributed to the data analysis. XXC and YJG wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chundi Xu, Yujing Gao or Pu Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of clinical specimens and all animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Differentially expressed genes of GSE117993.

Additional file 2:

Figure S1. Immune infiltration landscape in PIBD mucosa with CIBERSORT. Figure S2. Positive correlation between FCN1 expression and M0/M1 macrophage infiltration in the GSE126124 dataset. Figure S3. Cell type analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data (GSE121380). Figure S4. Upregulated expression of FCN1 and IL1B in mucosal macrophages from PIBD subjects of the single-cell RNA-seq dataset (GSE121380). Figure S5. The GSEA enrichment plots of significantly enriched pathways in FCN1high macrophages compared to FCN1low macrophages in Fig. 4C. Figure S6. Effect of human recombinant FCN1 protein (rhFCN1) on the NLRP3/IL-1β axis was investigated in THP-1-derived macrophages.

Additional file 3:

Table S2. GSEA results for FCN1high and FCN1low macrophages.

Additional file 4:

Table S3. qRT-PCR primer sequences.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Gao, Y., Xie, J. et al. Identification of FCN1 as a novel macrophage infiltration-associated biomarker for diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases. J Transl Med 21, 203 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04038-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-04038-1

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us