Open Access

A short CD3/CD28 costimulation combined with IL-21 enhance the generation of human memory stem T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

  • C. Alvarez-Fernández1, 2, 4,
  • L. Escribà-Garcia1, 2, 4,
  • S. Vidal2, 3,
  • J. Sierra1, 2 and
  • J. Briones1, 2Email author
Journal of Translational Medicine201614:214

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-0973-y

Received: 5 April 2016

Accepted: 11 July 2016

Published: 19 July 2016

Abstract

Background

Immunotherapy based on the adoptive transfer of gene modified T cells is an emerging approach for the induction of tumor-specific immune responses. Memory stem T cells, due to their enhanced antitumor and self-renewal capacity, have become potential candidate for adoptive T cell therapy of cancer. Methods to generate memory stem T cells ex vivo rely on CD3/CD28 costimulation and the use of cytokines such as IL-7 and IL-15 during the entire culture period. However, a strong costimulation may induce differentiation of memory stem T cells to effector memory T cells. Here we show that manipulation of the length of the costimulation and addition of IL-21 enhance the ex vivo expansion of memory stem T cells.

Methods

Purified naïve T cells from healthy donors were cultured in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28 coated beads, IL-7, IL-15 and/or IL-21 (25 ng/ml). T cells phenotype from the different memory and effector subpopulations were analyzed by multiparametric flow cytometry.

Results

A short anti-CD3/CD28 costimulation of naïve T cells, combined with IL-7 and IL-15 significantly increased the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ memory stem T cells ex vivo, compared to a prolonged costimulation (34.6 ± 4.4 % vs 15.6 ± 4.24 % in CD4+; p = 0.008, and 20.5 ± 4.00 % vs 7.7 ± 2.53 % in CD8+; p = 0.02). Moreover, the addition of IL-21 to this condition further enhanced the enrichment and expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ memory stem T cells with an increase in the absolute numbers (0.7 × 106 ± 0.1 vs 0.26 × 106 ± 0.1 cells for CD4+; p = 0.002 and 1.1 × 106 ± 0.1 vs 0.27 × 106 ± 0.1 cells for CD8+; p = 0.0002; short + IL-21 vs long).

Conclusions

These new in vitro conditions increase the frequencies and expansion of memory stem T cells and may have relevant clinical implications for the generation of this memory T cell subset for adoptive cell therapy of patients with cancer.

Keywords

Immunotherapy IL-21 Memory stem T cell

Background

Adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) represents a highly promising strategy to treat cancer [1, 2]. While this approach has been mostly based on the use of terminally differentiated effector T cells, recent studies indicate that the use of less differentiated T cells with extensive replicative capacity has greater engraftment and antitumor effect [36]. In particular, the recently described memory stem T cells (TSCM), defined as CD62L+CCR7+CD45RA+CD95+CD45ROCD28+CD27+IL2Rb+IL7Rα+, have enhanced proliferation, self-renewal, persistence and are able to differentiate into central memory, effector memory and effector T cells [6, 7]. Remarkably, studies in murine models have shown that TSCM have greater antitumor effect in vivo compared to other more differentiated T cell subsets [6, 8].

All these features make TSCM a promising T cell subset candidate for ACT of cancer. Although TSCM have been identified in the peripheral blood under basal conditions, the very low amount of these cells pose difficulty to their isolation, limiting their use for ACT of patients with cancer. Gattinoni et al. showed that CD8+ TSCM could be generated through the induction of the Wnt-β-catenin signaling [6]. Further studies demonstrated the generation and expansion of CD8+ TSCM from naïve T cells [911] through CD3/CD28 costimulation in combination with IL-7 and IL-15 cytokines. However, prolonged in vitro costimulation decrease the expression of memory markers substantially (e.g., CD62L, CCR7 or CD27) leading to a swift to more differentiated T cells [12, 13]. For these reasons, identification of reproducible methods to generate and expand large numbers of TSCM for ACT of cancer remains a clinical priority.

IL-21, the most recent member of the common γ-chain (γc) receptor cytokine family (that includes IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15), has a role in innate and adaptive immunity [12], and contrary to IL-2, plays a key role in the development and maintenance of central memory T cells by the induction of an early differentiation phenotype [14]. Importantly, T cells generated under IL-21 showed a superior antitumor effect in vivo in experimental models [1517]. IL-21 acts synergistically with IL-7 and IL-15 to promote proliferation and survival of both memory and naïve T cells [18, 19]. However, to our knowledge the effects of IL-21 on the TSCM generation have not been studied so far.

We explored whether manipulating the length of CD3/CD28 costimulation and/or the addition of IL-21 could enrich for the TSCM population within T cells cultured under IL-7 and IL-15. We found that both, a very short costimulation and the addition of IL-21 increase the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM and enhance their proliferative capacity, resulting in a significant increase of TSCM numbers at the end of the culture. Our work reveals a new method to ex vivo enrich and expand TSCM, which may have relevant clinical implications for ACT of patients with cancer.

Methods

T-cell isolation, sorting and culture

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from healthy donors (n = 6) after informed consent, isolated by centrifugation through a ficoll-hypaque gradient (lymphoprep, Axis-shield, UK), and frozen until use. Naïve T-cells were enriched with an on demand naïve T-cell enrichment kit (Stem cell technologies, Canada) including CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, CD36, CD45RO, CD56, CD66b, CD57, CD94, CD123, CD244, TCRγ/δ, glycophorin A and dextran-coated magnetic particles and according to manufacturer’s instructions.

TSCM, TCM, and TEM were FACS-purified on a FACS CANTO II cell sorter (BD Bio- sciences, USA) using the fluorescent antibodies anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD45RA, anti-CD45RO, anti-CD27, anti-CD95 and anti-CCR7.

Primary cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10 % heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). All cell cultures were performed at 37 °C in a fully humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2 in air.

Purified naïve T cells (higher than 95 %) were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 magnetic beads (Life Technologies, USA) in 1:2 bead/T-cell ratio, and then cultured with: IL-7 and IL-15 at 25 ng/ml each [11] (Peprotech, USA) or IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21 at 25 ng/ml each (Peprotech, USA). 2,5 × 105 cells/ml per well were plated in a 24-wells plate. After day 6, cells were cultured at a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml and plated in 12 or 6-well plates (depending on cell number). Cytokines and medium were replaced every 3–4 days, and cells were counted every 3–4 days by Trypan blue dye exclusion.

All donor’s samples were obtained according to a protocol approved by the Ethics Comittee of Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau.

Lentivirus production and transduction

A second generation lentival expression vector pLS-CG was used to generate GFP-encoding lentivirus. Lentivirus was produced in 293T cells cotransfected with the lentiviral vector and the packaging vectors pCMV-dR8.91 and pCMV-G using jet PRIME (Polyplus Transfection). Medium was changed 4 h after transfection, and lentivirus collected and concentrated after 48–72 h. Transduction was performed 48 h after initial stimulation by 1000 g spinoculation for 2 h at 32 °C in the presence of polybrene (5 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). GFP expression was detected by flow cytometry in TSCM at day 8 of culture.

Flow cytometry, and antibodies and intracellular staining

Cells were thawed and labeled with fluorescent antibodies against human CD4-APC-Vio-770 (clone VIT4), CD8-Viogreen (clone BW135/80), CD45RA-PerCP-Vio700 (clone T6D11), CD45RO-PE (clone UCHL1), CD27-Vioblue (clone M-T271), CD95-FITC (clone DX2) and CCR7-PE-vio770 (clone REA108) (all from Miltenyi Biotech, Germany).

For intracellular staining, cells were stimulated with 50 ng/mL PMA and 1 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) during 6 h. Brefeldin 1× (eBioscience, USA) was added for the last 4 h. Cells were stained with surface antibodies, washed and fixed with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm (BD Biosciences, USA), and intracellular staining was performed with anti–IL-2, anti-IFN, granzyme-A, and perforin specific-antibodies (miltenyiBiotech, Germany). All antibodies were titrated before use.

Corresponding isotypes for each antibody were used as controls. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using a MACS Quant cytometer (Miltenyi Biotech, Germany) and the FlowJo version V10 software (Treestar, USA). Different T cell subpopulations obtained from fresh blood (Fig. 1a) and cultured cells (Fig. 1b) were determined by a previous published gating strategy [11] using fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls for each antibody (i.e., samples stained with all fluorochromes except the one of interest). Particularly, TSCM were identified by a previously described plotting strategy [11]. Briefly, CD4+ and CD8+ cells were sorted and a CCR7 against CD45RO plot were used to select CCR7+CD45RO cells in each subpopulation. In these cells, we identified CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+ cells by plotting CCR7 against CD45RA. Then, CD27 was used to detect CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+ cells. Finally, a plot of CD95 against CCR7 was used to identify CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+CD95+ TSCM (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Gating strategy for the identification of human TSCM. T cells were identified by gating on lymphocytes (SSC versus FSC), singlets (FSC-H versus FSC-A) and live T cells (SSC versus LIVE/DEAD). CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were simultaneously identified with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 antibodies. a Gating strategy of fresh blood cells. After gating on CD4+ and CD8+ cells, TCM and TEM subpopulations were identified based on CCR7 and CD45RO expression. In the gated CCR7+CD45RO population, cells expressing CD45RA and CD27 were further analyzed. In this later population (CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+), TN and TSCM were identified based on the CD95 expression. TN is defined as CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+CD95 whereas TSCM subpopulation is defined as CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+CD95+. Red arrows indicate the sequential gating strategy. b Gating strategy of 10 days culture cells. After gating on CD4+ and CD8+ cells, TCM and TEM subpopulations were identified based on CCR7 and CD45RO expression. In the gated CCR7+CD45RO population, cells expressing CD45RA and CD27 were further analyzed. In this later population (CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+), TSCM were identified based on the CD95 expression. TSCM subpopulation is defined as CCR7+CD45ROCD45RA+CD27+CD95+. Similarly, in the gated CCR7+CD45RO+ population, cells expressing CD45RA, CD27 and CD95+ identify a TSCM-like subpopulation, which is defined as CCR7+CD45RO+CD45RA+CD27+CD95+. Red arrows indicate the sequential gating strategy

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, USA). Data are shown as the mean ± SEM. Differences were tested for statistical significance using one-way ANOVA test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Short CD3/CD28 costimulation enriches for memory stem T cells (TSCM) cultured with IL-7/IL-15

To assess whether the length of CD3/CD28 costimulation has an impact on the maintenance of the TSCM phenotype in vitro, naïve T cells were cultured with low doses of IL-7 and IL-15 and activated with magnetic beads coated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28. A short CD3/CD28 costimulation (48 h) was compared to a long stimulus (the entire period of cell culture: 10 days) by analyzing individual T-cell subsets at different time points. As shown in Fig. 2a, while the percentage of CD4+ TSCM at day 4 was comparable between both conditions (35.64 ± 5.1 % and 28.38 ± 6.9 %; p = 0.42), the short CD3/CD28 costimulation led to a significant increase in the frequencies of CD4+ TSCM after day 4 that was maintained until the end of the culture (34.6 ± 4.4 % vs 15.6 ± 4.24 % respectively; p = 0.008) (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Short CD3/CD28 costimulation increases CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM frequencies compared with long costimulation. Naïve T cells from healthy donors (n = 6) were cultured for 10 days with short (48 h) (solid black line) or long (solid grey line) costimulation. a, b Frequency of CD4+ (a) and CD8+ (b) TSCM cell subset (mean ± SEM). c, d Frequencies of total TSCM (TSCM + TSCM-like) CD4+ (c) and CD8+ (d) (mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Similar results were obtained in the CD8+ TSCM population (Fig. 2b). A short costimulation generated a significant increase of CD8+ TSCM frequencies compared to a long costimulation (20.5 ± 4.00 % vs 7.7 ± 2.53 % at day 10, respectively; p = 0.02). Day 10 was selected as an endpoint for culture since a decline in TSCM numbers was observed after this time (data not shown) and over this time period TSCM expand to numbers considered to be sufficient for clinical translation.

According to previous data [9], when TSCM are cultured in vitro they may also acquire the expression of CD45RO, while preserving CD45RA and CCR7+CD27+CD95+ expression (i.e., a TSCM-like phenotype). We found no differences in the percentage of both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM-like cells across different time points over the culture period (19.4 ± 3.06 % vs 24.4 ± 2.6 % in CD4+; p = 0.252 and 49.95 ± 3.6 % vs 53.36 ± 1.04 % in CD8+; p = 0.35).

When total TSCM (i.e., TSCM + TSCM-like population) were analyzed (Fig. 2c, d), a higher percentage was observed in the CD4+ population after a short stimulation, reaching 54.02 ± 3.837 % at day 10 vs 38.49 ± 1.48 % in the long stimulus condition (p = 0.0054) (Fig. 2c). In the CD8+ population, a trend to higher percentages were found after short costimulation compared to a long costimulation (70.45 ± 4.1 % vs 60.2 ± 3.29 %; p = 0.08) (Fig. 2d).

IL-21 increases the frequencies of TSCM generated under short CD3/CD28 costimulation

Next, we analyzed the impact of IL-21 on the in vitro generation and maintenance of TSCM. As shown in Fig. 3a, the addition of IL-21 to the culture from day 0 significantly increased the percentage of CD4+ TSCM after a short CD3/CD28 costimulation (47.92 ± 4.10 % vs 34.62 ± 4.44 %; p = 0.006). However, IL-21 had no impact on the percentage of CD4+ TSCM cultured under long costimulation (21.1 ± 1.31 % vs 15.6 ± 4.24 %; p = 0.17) (Fig. 3a). The same hold true for CD8+ TSCM. IL-21 significantly increased the percentage of CD8+ TSCM cultured under short costimulation (34.15 ± 3.51 % vs 20.5 ± 4.005 %; p = 0.00039) at day 10 of culture, while adding IL-21 to the long costimulation condition resulted in no significant changes (10.20 ± 2.34 % vs 7.73 ± 3.27 %; p = 0.14) (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

IL-21 enhances CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM frequencies. Naïve T cells from healthy donors (n = 6) were cultured for 10 days with short (solid black line) or long (solid grey line) costimulation and in the presence (black dashed line) or absence (grey dashed line) of IL-21. a, b Frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM (mean ± SEM) are shown in (a) and (b), respectively. c, d Frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ Total TSCM (TSCM + TSCM-like) (mean ± SEM) are shown in (c) and (d), respectively. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Finally, we analyzed if IL-21 could increase the percentage of total TSCM (i.e., TSCM + TSCM-like population). At day 10, significant higher frequencies were noted in the CD4+ subset in the short costimulation in the presence of IL-21 (62.92 ± 5.83 % vs 54.02 ± 3.83 %; short + IL-21 vs short, respectively; p = 0.025) (Fig. 3c). Although the differences between short and long stimulation in the CD8+ subset are enhanced by the addition of IL-21 (74.15 ± 5.26 % vs 60.2 ± 3.29 %; short + IL-21 vs short respectively; p = 0.04), no significant differences were observed in the short stimulation condition by the addition of IL-21 regarding total TSCM (74.15 ± 5.26 % vs 70.45 ± 4.13 %; p = 0.56) (Fig. 3d).

IL-21 is a cytokine with action on multiple T cell subsets. To clarify if the short stimulus with IL-21 could affect any of the populations present in the culture, different memory T cell subsets were analyzed at day 10 (Fig. 4). The percentages of central memory T cells were 34.27 ± 4.13 % vs 26.4 ± 6.9 %; p = 0.95 in CD4+ and 16.6 ± 8.52 % vs 15.45 ± 9.5 %; p > 0.05 in CD8+ (short vs short + IL-21 respectively). The percentages of effector memory T cells were 7.97 ± 0.12 % vs 5.54 ± 0.07 %; p > 0.05 in CD4+, and 4.8 ± 0.54 % vs 4.15 ± 0.59 %; p > 0.05 in CD8+ (short vs short + IL-21 respectively). In addition, CD4+/CD8+ TSCM ratio was also analyzed to explore the possibility of an overexpansion of CD8+ in detriment of CD4+. IL-21 did not preferentially enriched for the CD8+ population since the CD4+ cells were maintained over the cell culture period in all the conditions tested (CD4+/CD8+ TSCM ratio: 1.03 ± 0.28 vs 1.34 ± 0.19 for long versus long + IL-21 costimulation, and 0.68 ± 0.14 vs 0.72 ± 0.002 for short vs short + IL-21 costimulation; p = 0.23).
Fig. 4

Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets composition. a, b Column graphs showing the relative frequencies (mean ± SEM) of CD4+ (a) and CD8+ (b) T cell subsets respectively, for each condition tested (long costimulation, short costimulation, long + IL-21, and short + IL-21). TN (T Naïve), TCM (T central memory), TEM (T effector memory), TEMRA (T effector memory-RA+ cells)

Short costimulation combined with IL-21 enhance TSCM expansion

Next, we analyzed the effect of IL-21 in TSCM expansion under the costimulation conditions described. As shown in Fig. 5a, b, the addition of IL-21 to the culture produced a significant increase in the TSCM expansion. The combination of short costimulation and IL-21 led to the greater TSCM expansion, for both CD4+ and CD8+ subsets, among all conditions tested (CD4+ TSCM: 311.34 ± 39 fold vs 192.84 ± 58.61 fold; TSCM: 728.06 ± 53 fold vs 442.73 ± 122 fold; IL-21 vs no IL-21 respectively; p = 0.040) (Fig. 5a, b). Finally, we analyzed the impact of IL-21 on total TSCM expansion. As shown in Fig. 5c, d, the combination of short costimulation and IL-21 led to the greatest expansion of total CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM (351.79 ± 36 fold vs 251.83 ± 16.6 fold; p = 0.07, and 744.46 ± 101.76 fold vs 592.3 ± 172 fold; short + IL-21 vs long, respectively; p = 0.1) (Fig. 5c, d).
Fig. 5

IL-21 enhances CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM expansion. Naïve T cells from healthy donors (n = 3) were cultured for 10 days and fold expansion were analyzed in short costimulation (solid black line), long costimulation (solid grey line) short + IL-21 (black dashed line) and long + IL-21 (grey dashed line) conditions. a, b Absolute fold expansion of CD4+ (a) and CD8+ (b) (mean ± SEM), expressed in increment of cells from the starting culture time point is shown. c, d Absolute fold expansion of CD4+ (c) and CD8+ (d) total TSCM (TSCM + TSCM-like) (mean ± SEM). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

TSCM shows different functional properties

To further define the functional features of T-cells generated under these conditions, we analyzed the expression of IL-2, IFN-γ, granzyme-A and perforin on FACS-purified TSCM, TCM and TEM at day 10 of culture. We found that both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM secrete higher levels of IL-2 compared to TCM (CD4: 84.65 ± 0.75 % vs 83.3 ± 0.7 %; p = 0.48; CD8: 68.86 ± 1.9 % vs 62.56 ± 0.13 %, p = 0.03) and TEM (CD4: 84.65 ± 0.75 % vs 80.5 ± 0.75 %; p = 0.057; CD8: 68.86 ± 1.9 % vs 57.8 ± 1.12 %, p = 0.0022) (Additional file 1: Figure S1 A, B). Moreover, we observed lower proportion of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM that secrete IFN-γ compared to TCM (CD4: 8.18 ± 0.16 % vs 13.6 ± 1 %; p = 0.016; CD8: 18.66 ± 4.2 % vs 48.76 ± 8.2 %, p = 0.0397) and TEM (CD4: 8.18 ± 0.16 % vs 21.55 ± 0.25 %; p = 0.0012; CD8: 18.66 ± 4.2 % vs 60.86 ± 6.4 %, p = 0.0091) and granzyme-A compared to TCM (CD4: 34.83 ± 8.6 % vs 55.66 ± 1.53 %; p = 0.0631; CD8: 7.2 ± 3.3 % vs 75.8 ± 0.3 %, p = 0.0004) and TEM (CD4: 34.83 ± 8.6 % vs 78.13 ± 2.36 %; p = 0.0033; CD8: 7.2 ± 3.3 % vs 78.1 ± 0.5 %, p = 0.0004). We also observed that CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM stained mainly negative for perforin (0.024 ± 0.002 % and 0.9 ± 0.3 %, respectively) (Additional file 1: Figure S1 C–H).

Finally, we analyzed the phenotype and self-renewal capacity of FACS-purified TSCM cells after being expanded for 10 days. We observed that, in contrast to TCM and TEM subsets, both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM maintained their phenotype and proliferative capacity in culture for another 10 days after sorting. Remarkably, 93 % of the CD4+ and 88 % of CD8+ T cells displayed a TSCM phenotype after 20 days in culture with IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21, while TCM and TEM largely lost their proliferative capacities and became differentiated (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM are efficiently transduced by lentiviral vectors

Unlike activated and dividing cells, quiescent T cells are less permissive to vector transduction. To assess whether TSCM generated under this new conditions could be genetically modified for adoptive immunotherapy, an encoding-GFP lentivirus was used to transduce TSCM. We have analyzed transduction efficiencies (multiplicity of infection (m.o.i.) = 1) following stimulation of naïve T cells for 48 h with magnetic anti-CD3/CD28 beads and IL-7, IL-15 and IL-21. Gene transfer in CD4+and CD8+ cells averaged 28 and 19 % respectively. The transduction efficiency was also analyzed in the different memory subset presents in the culture. We observed similar transduction percentages of TSCM and TCM in both CD4+ and CD8+ population (32.25 ± 5.91 % vs 24.30 ± 4.36 % in CD4+, TSCM vs TCM respectively; P = 0.056 and 21.29 ± 3.54 % vs 17.96 ± 3.07 % in CD8+, TSCM vs TCM respectively; p = 0.5;) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Analysis of transduction efficiency with a GFP-expressing lentivirus. Lentivirus transduction efficiency measured in CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM and TCM subsets by flow cytometry (% of cells expressing GFP; mean ± SEM)

Discussion

The generation of TSCM for ACT has become a clinically relevant issue since preclinical studies have shown that the use of the less-differentiated TSCM is associated with superior T-cell engraftment, persistence, and antitumor efficacy [36]. Although ACT to treat cancer have experimented significant progress in the past few years, particularly with the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) approach, improvements on their clinical efficacy are clearly needed. Remarkably, although no ACT clinical trials with TSCM have been done in cancer patients so far, studies in patients with lymphoma receiving CAR-T cells showed that the infusion of >5 % of cells with a TSCM phenotype correlated with greater persistence and expansion in vivo, properties associated with clinical efficacy [20].

Previous studies have shown that the combination of IL-7, IL-15 and CD3/CD28 costimulation led to the generation of TSCM from naïve T cells [9]. Interestingly, cells generated under this condition also express CD45RO, which indicates that the combination of prolonged CD3/CD28 costimulation with IL-7 and IL-15 induce a more differentiated TSCM (TSCM-like) than the originally described [9]. This could be related to the stimulation through CD3 and CD28, which expands T cells efficiently but also causes a drastic change in the cell phenotype, including downregulation of CD45RA, CCR7 and CD62L [6, 13, 21]. Although both subsets have comparable gene expression profiles, it remains to be proven that the TSCM-like subset (i.e., those cells expressing CD45RO in addition to CD45RA and CCR7) retain similar antitumor efficacy than the less differentiated TSCM. In this regard, when CAR-T cells were cultured with IL-7/IL-15, only the fraction CD45RA+/CCR7+ retained the ability to expand after repetitive antigen stimulations [20]. Accordingly, strategies directed to preserve the phenotype of TSCM during their ex vivo generation should be regarded a clinical priority.

In this study, we show that a very short (48 h) CD3/CD28 costimulation increases the percentage of TSCM within the CD4+ and CD8+ subsets in detriment of a more differentiated phenotypes. Moreover, the contribution of the less differentiated TSCM to the total TSCM frequency is superior in the short costimulation condition compared to a long costimulation, in line with the concept that prolonging the CD3/CD28 stimulation in the culture is associated with T cell differentiation [21, 22]. In our condition, TSCM proliferation was not affected by the absence of a prolonged CD3/CD28 signal, suggesting that a continued costimulatory signal would not be necessary to promote an efficient ex vivo TSCM expansion in the presence of IL-7 and IL-15 [2325].

The T-cell receptor signal strength impacts on T cell expansion and differentiation [26]. Methods for the generation of effector T cells based on CD3/CD28 stimulation have relied on the use of a high bead:cell ratio (e.g., 3:1). We observed that a high bead-to-cell ratio reduced the frequency of TSCM and did not generate a strong T cell proliferative response, a fact that may be associated with activation-induced T cell death [21, 27]. In contrast, in our hands, a low bead-to-cell ratio (e.g., 1:2) coupled to a short costimulation was the best condition for promoting the generation of higher TSCM frequencies while maintaining their proliferative capacity. This is in line with recent studies showing that low or equal bead:cell ratios give the higher yields of T cells when cultured in IL-7 and IL-15 [21]. Moreover we observed that the short TCR triggering do not reduced the transduction efficiency of TSCM, probably due to the presence of the IL-7, IL-15 or IL-21 cytokines, which promote long-term survival of resting T cells, while maintaining their maturational status [28].

Previous studies have shown that IL-21 synergizes with either IL-7 or IL-15 to regulate CD8+ T cell expansion and to maintain a memory phenotype [18, 19, 29]. However, the potential role of IL-21 in the ex vivo generation of TSCM has not been described. Here, we show for the first time that the addition of IL-21 significantly increases the percentage of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM cultured with a short CD3/CD28 stimulation and IL-7/IL-15. Remarkably, addition of IL-21 to that condition further increased the proliferation rate of TSCM, which translated into an increase of absolute numbers of TSCM at the end of the culture. Although previous studies have shown that CD3/CD28 costimulation in combination with IL-7 and IL-15 promote a substantial increment in TSCM expansion [9], the reduction in the length of costimulation and, particularly, the addition of IL-21 produces even higher numbers of TSCM that could be sufficient for clinical translation. Interestingly, this effect was noted in both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM, and although the proliferation rate was greater in the CD8+ subset compared to that in CD4+, it is remarkable that the CD4+/CD8+ ratios of TSCM were preserved over the culture period.

According to previous studies showing a higher expression of IL-21 receptor in activated naïve T cells [30], and that the effect of IL-21 might depend on the T cell differentiation status [21, 31], we observed that the impact of IL-21 was more pronounced in those T cells with a phenotype close to naïve T cells, resulting in an enrichment of less differentiated TSCM within the total TSCM subset. Moreover, we have noticed a higher expression of IL-21R in naïve and TSCM cells compared to more differentiated T cells subsets (57.5 % of TSCM vs 22 % of TCM in CD4+ and 42.6 % of TSCM vs 5 % of TCM in CD8+) (data not shown). Interestingly, this difference is more pronounced at day 4 of the culture (in particular in CD8+ T cells), which could increase the effect of IL-21 in the following days.

It has been shown that self-renewal depends on STAT3 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) signaling cytokines, including IL-6, IL-10 and IL-21, which inhibit exhaustion and differentiation of T cell [32]. Similarly, T cells expanded in the presence of IL-21 (the unique common γ-chain cytokines to sustain STAT3 activation) prevent the loss of CD45RA, CD62L, CD27, and IL-7Rα, increasing the ability of the cell to release IL-2 [33, 34]. Interestingly, we noticed that TSCM, TCM and TEM cultured in the presence of IL-21 express high level of IL-2. In addition, TSCM express low levels of IFN-γ, granzyme-A and perforin compared to TCM and TEM. Thus, TSCM display phenotypic and functional characteristics of early-differentiated cells.

We also observed that highly purified naïve T cells are a more suitable starting population for TSCM generation in contrast to the use of “bulk” peripheral blood mononuclear cells [10, 20]. The use of purified naïve T cells may overcome the variability of this subset observed between donors when using whole peripheral blood lymphocytes. Another important issue is the potential deleterious effect that more differentiated memory T cells present in the starting cell population may have on the generation of TSCM. Accordingly, in our experience, TSCM are more efficiently generated when naïve T cells are used as starting population (data not shown), in line with previous data from Bonini´s group [9].

Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated that when naïve T cells are cultured with IL-7 and IL-15, the use of a very short CD3/CD28 costimulation enhances CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM generation and expansion. Moreover, the addition of IL-21 to this culture conditions produces a further enrichment and greater expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM. Importantly, the conditions described here allow an efficient transduction of both CD4+ and CD8+ TSCM with lentivirus. These refinements on the in vitro conditions may be of clinical relevance for the generation of TSCM for ACT of patients with cancer, and can be easily adapted to preserve this cell subset in the final product under GMP conditions.

Abbreviations

ACT: 

adoptive T cell therapy

TCM

central memory T cells

CAR: 

chimeric antigen receptor

TEM

effector memory T cells

TEMRA

effector memory-RA + T cells

FMO: 

fluorescence minus one

TSCM

memory stem T cells

m.o.i: 

multiplicity of infection

TN

naïve T cells

PBMCs: 

peripheral blood mononuclear cells

γc: 

γ-chain

IFN-γ: 

interferon gamma

STAT3: 

signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CAF: Design, experimental and analytical performance. LEG: Experimental performance. SV: Design performance. JS: Analytical performance. JB: Study’s conception, design, and analytical performance. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Sonia Guedan for helpful discussions and critical review of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All donor’s samples were obtained according to a protocol approved by the Ethics Comittee of Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau.

Funding

This work was supported by Fundació La Marató TV3, Cellex Research Foundation (Barcelona), AGAUR 2014SGR-1281, and ISCIII RD12/0036/0071.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hematology Service, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
(2)
Autonomous University
(3)
IIB-Institut Recerca Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau
(4)
Laboratory of Experimental Hematology–IIB, Institut Recerca Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau

References

  1. June CH. Principles of adoptive T cell cancer therapy. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:1204–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:269–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hinrichs CS, Borman ZA, Cassard L, Gattinoni L, Spolski R, Yu Z, Sanchez-Perez L, Muranski P, Kern SJ, Logun C, et al. Adoptively transferred effector cells derived from naive rather than central memory CD8+ T cells mediate superior antitumor immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:17469–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhou X, Cui Y, Huang X, Yu Z, Thomas AM, Ye Z, Pardoll DM, Jaffee EM, Cheng L. Lentivirus-mediated gene transfer and expression in established human tumor antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells and primary unstimulated T cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2003;14:1089–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger C, Jensen MC, Lansdorp PM, Gough M, Elliott C, Riddell SR. Adoptive transfer of effector CD8+ T cells derived from central memory cells establishes persistent T cell memory in primates. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:294–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gattinoni L, Lugli E, Ji Y, Pos Z, Paulos CM, Quigley MF, Almeida JR, Gostick E, Yu Z, Carpenito C, et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat Med. 2011;17:1290–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lugli E, Dominguez MH, Gattinoni L, Chattopadhyay PK, Bolton DL, Song K, Klatt NR, Brenchley JM, Vaccari M, Gostick E, et al. Superior T memory stem cell persistence supports long-lived T cell memory. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:594–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Palmer DC, Muranski P, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, Borman ZA, Kerkar SP, Scott CD, Finkelstein SE, et al. Determinants of successful CD8+ T-cell adoptive immunotherapy for large established tumors in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:5343–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Cieri N, Camisa B, Cocchiarella F, Forcato M, Oliveira G, Provasi E, Bondanza A, Bordignon C, Peccatori J, Ciceri F, et al. IL-7 and IL-15 instruct the generation of human memory stem T cells from naive precursors. Blood. 2013;121:573–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gomez-Eerland R, Nuijen B, Heemskerk B, van Rooij N, van den Berg JH, Beijnen JH, Uckert W, Kvistborg P, Schumacher TN, Haanen JB, Jorritsma A. Manufacture of gene-modified human T-cells with a memory stem/central memory phenotype. Hum Gene Ther Methods. 2014;25:277–87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Lugli E, Gattinoni L, Roberto A, Mavilio D, Price DA, Restifo NP, Roederer M. Identification, isolation and in vitro expansion of human and nonhuman primate T stem cell memory cells. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:33–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Teschner D, Wenzel G, Distler E, Schnurer E, Theobald M, Neurauter AA, Schjetne K, Herr W. In vitro stimulation and expansion of human tumour-reactive CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes by anti-CD3/CD28/CD137 magnetic beads. Scand J Immunol. 2011;74:155–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Li Y, Kurlander RJ. Comparison of anti-CD3 and anti-CD28-coated beads with soluble anti-CD3 for expanding human T cells: differing impact on CD8 T cell phenotype and responsiveness to restimulation. J Transl Med. 2010;8:104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinrichs CS, Spolski R, Paulos CM, Gattinoni L, Kerstann KW, Palmer DC, Klebanoff CA, Rosenberg SA, Leonard WJ, Restifo NP. IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood. 2008;111:5326–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang G, Tschoi M, Spolski R, Lou Y, Ozaki K, Feng C, Kim G, Leonard WJ, Hwu P. In vivo antitumor activity of interleukin 21 mediated by natural killer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:9016–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Moroz A, Eppolito C, Li Q, Tao J, Clegg CH, Shrikant PA. IL-21 enhances and sustains CD8+ T cell responses to achieve durable tumor immunity: comparative evaluation of IL-2, IL-15, and IL-21. J Immunol. 2004;173:900–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Carlo E, Comes A, Orengo AM, Rosso O, Meazza R, Musiani P, Colombo MP, Ferrini S. IL-21 induces tumor rejection by specific CTL and IFN-gamma-dependent CXC chemokines in syngeneic mice. J Immunol. 2004;172:1540–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zeng R, Spolski R, Finkelstein SE, Oh S, Kovanen PE, Hinrichs CS, Pise-Masison CA, Radonovich MF, Brady JN, Restifo NP, et al. Synergy of IL-21 and IL-15 in regulating CD8+ T cell expansion and function. J Exp Med. 2005;201:139–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu S, Lizee G, Lou Y, Liu C, Overwijk WW, Wang G, Hwu P. IL-21 synergizes with IL-7 to augment expansion and anti-tumor function of cytotoxic T cells. Int Immunol. 2007;19:1213–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu Y, Zhang M, Ramos CA, Durett A, Liu E, Dakhova O, Liu H, Creighton CJ, Gee AP, Heslop HE, et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood. 2014;123:3750–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Shi Y, Wu W, Wan T, Liu Y, Peng G, Chen Z, Zhu H. Impact of polyclonal anti-CD3/CD28-coated magnetic bead expansion methods on T cell proliferation, differentiation and function. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;15:129–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Trickett A, Kwan YL. T cell stimulation and expansion using anti-CD3/CD28 beads. J Immunol Methods. 2003;275:251–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramanathan S, Gagnon J, Dubois S, Forand-Boulerice M, Richter MV, Ilangumaran S. Cytokine synergy in antigen-independent activation and priming of naive CD8+ T lymphocytes. Crit Rev Immunol. 2009;29:219–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramanathan S, Gagnon J, Ilangumaran S. Antigen-nonspecific activation of CD8+ T lymphocytes by cytokines: relevance to immunity, autoimmunity, and cancer. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008;56:311–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tan JT, Dudl E, LeRoy E, Murray R, Sprent J, Weinberg KI, Surh CD. IL-7 is critical for homeostatic proliferation and survival of naive T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:8732–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Sallusto F, Geginat J, Lanzavecchia A. Central memory and effector memory T cell subsets: function, generation, and maintenance. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:745–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Weiss EM, Schmidt A, Vobis D, Garbi N, Lahl K, Mayer CT, Sparwasser T, Ludwig A, Suri-Payer E, Oberle N, Krammer PH. Foxp3-mediated suppression of CD95L expression confers resistance to activation-induced cell death in regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2011;187:1684–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cavalieri S, Cazzaniga S, Geuna M, Magnani Z, Bordignon C, Naldini L, Bonini C. Human T lymphocytes transduced by lentiviral vectors in the absence of TCR activation maintain an intact immune competence. Blood. 2003;102:497–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Alves NL, Arosa FA, van Lier RA. IL-21 sustains CD28 expression on IL-15-activated human naive CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:755–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Battaglia A, Buzzonetti A, Baranello C, Fanelli M, Fossati M, Catzola V, Scambia G, Fattorossi A. Interleukin-21 (IL-21) synergizes with IL-2 to enhance T-cell receptor-induced human T-cell proliferation and counteracts IL-2/transforming growth factor-beta-induced regulatory T-cell development. Immunology. 2013;139:109–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mehta DS, Wurster AL, Grusby MJ. Biology of IL-21 and the IL-21 receptor. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:84–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gattinoni L, Klebanoff CA, Restifo NP. Paths to stemness: building the ultimate antitumour T cell. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:671–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y, Bleakley M, Yee C. IL-21 influences the frequency, phenotype, and affinity of the antigen-specific CD8 T cell response. J Immunol. 2005;175:2261–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Albrecht J, Frey M, Teschner D, Carbol A, Theobald M, Herr W, Distler E. IL-21-treated naive CD45RA+ CD8+ T cells represent a reliable source for producing leukemia-reactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes with high proliferative potential and early differentiation phenotype. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;60:235–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement