Open Access

Phase I clinical trial of autologous NK cell therapy using novel expansion method in patients with advanced digestive cancer

  • Naoyuki Sakamoto1, 3,
  • Takeshi Ishikawa1, 2Email author,
  • Satoshi Kokura1, 4,
  • Tetsuya Okayama1, 2,
  • Kaname Oka1,
  • Mitsuko Ideno5,
  • Fumiyo Sakai5,
  • Akiko Kato5,
  • Masashige Tanabe5,
  • Tatsuji Enoki5,
  • Junichi Mineno5,
  • Yuji Naito1,
  • Yoshito Itoh1 and
  • Toshikazu Yoshikawa2
Journal of Translational Medicine201513:277

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0632-8

Received: 22 May 2015

Accepted: 7 August 2015

Published: 25 August 2015

Abstract

Background

NK cells can destroy tumor cells without prior sensitization or immunization. Tumors often lose expression of MHC molecules and/or antigens. However, NK cells can lyse tumor cells in a non-MHC-restricted manner and independent of the expression of tumor-associated antigens. NK cells are therefore considered ideal for adoptive cancer immunotherapy; however the difficulty of obtaining large numbers of fully functional NK cells that are safe to administer deters its clinical use. This phase I clinical trial seeks to address this obstacle by first developing a novel system that expands large numbers of highly activated clinical grade NK cells, and second, determining if these cells are safe in a mono-treatment so they can be combined with other reagents in the next round of clinical trials.

Methods

Patients with unresectable, locally advanced and/or metastatic digestive cancer who did not succeed with standard therapy were enrolled. NK cells were expanded ex vivo by stimulating PBMCs with OK432, IL-2, and modified FN-CH296 induced T cells. Patients were administered autologous natural killer cell three times weekly via intravenous infusions in a dose-escalating manner (dose 0.5 × 109, 1.0 × 109, 2.0 × 109 cells/injection, three patients/one cohort).

Results

Total cell population had a median expansion of 586-fold (range 95–1102), with a significantly pure (90.96 %) NK cell population. Consequently, NK cells were expanded to approximately 4720-fold (range 1372–14,116) with cells being highly lytic in vitro and strongly expressing functional markers such as NKG2D and CD16. This NK cell therapy was very well tolerated with no severe adverse events. Although no clinical responses were observed, cytotoxicity of peripheral blood was elevated approximately twofolds up to 4 weeks post the last transfer.

Conclusion

We successfully generated large numbers of activated NK cells from small quantities of blood without prior purification of the cells. We also determined that the expanded cells were safe to administer in a monotherapy and are suitable for the next round of clinical trials where their efficacy will be tested combined with other reagents.

Trial Registration: UMIN UMIN000007527

Background

Natural killer (NK) cells play critical roles in the early innate response to pathogens and tumor cells [1, 2]. These cells exhibit strong cytotoxic activity against tumor cells without prior sensitization or immunization, and produce numerous cytokines resulting in the subsequent activation of the adoptive immune system.

Tumors often lose expression of tumor-associated antigens and/or MHC molecules as a means of immune escaping detection by T cells [35]. NK cells can lyse tumor cells in a non-MHC-restricted manner and are independent of the expression of tumor-associated antigens. Due to this, NK cells are considered ideal for adoptive cancer immunotherapy. In contrast to vaccine therapy or antigen-specific adoptive T cell therapy, it is not necessary to identify target tumor antigen for NK cell-based immunotherapy; this makes it more universally applicable and particularly effective for treating solid tumors that frequently lose tumor-associated antigens and/or self-MHC molecules. NK cell-based immunotherapy has been recommended as a means to improving hematologic malignancies [6, 7] and solid tumors [812] in clinical settings.

NK cells seem to possess many advantages that would make it ideal for clinical application. However, existing drawbacks are that it is difficult to generate large numbers of fully functional NK cells, and a standard method of ex vivo NK cell expansion has not been established yet. T cells can be expanded more than 1000-fold ex vivo using anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody in combination with cytokines and other stimuli [13, 14]. However in general, NK cells cannot sustain proliferation, therefore, their proliferative responses to cytokines with or without being co-cultured with other cells is modest and temporary [1517]. To overcome this obstacle, researchers are seeking to develop new methods to obtain larger populations of highly pure NK cells. Examples include the ex vivo expansion of NK cells from (1) leukapheresis products by immunomagnetic beads selection [1820], (2) from hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from umbilical cord blood [21, 22], and (3) cytokine-based expansion method co-cultured with transgenic or irradiated tumor cells, and irradiated peripheral blood mononuclear cells [23, 24]. While these methods [1824] have some merit, they have major drawbacks including: low expansion scale [20], low purity of NK cells [24], high cost [1820], complicated procedures [1824], and safety issues for human administration [23]. Developing innovative strategies to generate clinically relevant pure NK cells in large numbers would provide an important breakthrough in NK cell-based immunotherapy.

With this in mind, we recently developed a novel clinical-grade NK cell expansion system using recombinant human fibronectin fragment (FN-CH296, RetroNectin®)-induced T-cells (RN-T cells) as a stimulator. This method delivered a 688 ± 76-fold expansion of total cells in a sample of 31 cancer patients with purity levels of 84.7 ± 3.6 % without prior purification (Additional file 1: Table S1) [25]. Moreover, the majority of expanded cells highly expressed functional markers such as NKG2D (97.3 ± 0.6 %) and CD16 (96.8 ± 0.7 %) and exerted strong cytotoxicity in vitro and in experimental models of human tumors [25]. Having successfully produced these high quality NK cells, our secondary goal was to evaluate their safety when administered to patients with advanced digestive cancers and also assessed their efficacy as a minor objective.

The maximum tolerated dose for NK cells has not yet been established and no general range has been suggested. In fact, there is conflicting data surrounding the maximum tolerated dose. In prior research the administration of a large number of NK cells (almost 5–25 × 109 cells for 50 kg patient) in conjunction with lymph depleting chemotherapy and systemic IL-2 administration was found to be effective and safe [68]. On the other hand, severe adverse events have been reported when fewer (0.4–2.0 × 109 cells for 50 kg patient) NK cells were administered [8]. Taking these conflicting results into consideration, in this phase I clinical study, we evaluated the safety of autologous NK cells generated by our novel system by administered advanced digestive cancer patients with 0.5–2.0 × 109 cells (a similar dose to that used in prior studies [69, 11, 12]) a total of three times.

Methods

Eligibility

Patients with un-resectable, locally advanced and/or metastatic digestive cancer that was histologically confirmed were enrolled in this study. All patients had failed prior standard therapy and were recruited between September 2012 and June 2013. Eligibility criteria included: age >20 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, no plans to receive chemotherapy other than oral fluorouracil prodrugs or radiation therapy, a life expectancy of at least 3 months, absence of serious cardiovascular disease, adequate vital organ function as indicated by leukocyte count ≥3000/mm3, neutrophil count ≥1500/mm3, platelet count ≥100,000/mm3, hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL, serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤100 IU/L, serum total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dL, serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL, and blood urea nitrogen level ≤25 mg/dL. Patients were excluded if they tested positive for hepatitis B or C virus, HIV, HTLV-1, syphilis infection, had active severe infection, serious complications such as severe diabetes mellitus, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 3 months, were pregnant or lactating, had a medical history of severe hypersensitivity or autoimmune disease.

Study design

This was a non-randomized, open label, phase I clinical trial with dose escalation of NK cells. The primary end-point of this study was to assess the safety of the NK cells derived from our method, and the secondary end-points were clinical and immunological responses. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. The trial was designed and conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration and the Ethical Guidelines for Clinical Research (the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan). All participants provided written informed consent. This trial was registered as the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trial Registry as ID: UMIN000007527.

Cell processing

Preparation of the FN-CH296 (RetroNectin®)-stimulated T (RN-T) cells.

Peripheral blood (10–20 mL) was taken from each cancer patient. FN-CH296 (RetroNectin®, Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan)-stimulated T (RN-T) cells were prepared by a previously described method [13]. Briefly, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were separated using Ficoll-Paque PREMIUM (GE Healthcare, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, 2 × 106 of cells were re-suspended in GT-T551 culture medium (Takara Bio) containing heat-inactivated autologous plasma (0.5 %) and recombinant IL-2 (Proleukin; NovartisPharma, Nürnberg, Germany), then transferred to a cell-culture immobilized with both anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3: Janssen Pharmaceutical k.k, Tokyo, Japan) and FN-CH296. On day 4, the cells were transferred to CultiLife® 215 bag (Takara Bio), and diluted with GT-T551 medium containing plasma (0.5 %) and IL-2 every 3 or 4 days. Cells were cultured for 1–2 weeks, γ-irradiated and then used as stimulators for NK-cell expansion.

Large-scale expansion of NK cells

PBMCs were obtained from the peripheral blood (20–40 mL) of each cancer patient. Subsequently, 5.6 × 106 of PBMCs were re-suspended in GT-T507α culture medium supplemented with heat-inactivated autologous plasma (1.0 %), IL-2 and OK-432 (Picibanil: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Tokyo, Japan). Cells were then transferred to a cell-culture flask and RN-T cells as a stimulator were added. On day 7, the cultured cells were transferred to a CultiLife® 215 bag and stimulated again by RN-T cells in GT-T510 culture medium (Takara Bio) supplemented with heat-inactivated autologous plasma (1.0 %) and IL-2. On day 11, the cells were transferred to a CultiLife® Eva bag (Takara Bio), and GT-T510 containing plasma (1.0 %) and IL-2 were added. Cells were then expanded by adding GT-T510 medium and increasing the number of CultiLife® Eva bag as necessary. On days 21 and 22, the cultured cells were harvested, washed and re-suspended in 100 mL of a saline based-solution supplemented with 1 % of human serum albumin (Albuminar; CSL Behring, PA, USA) then administered to patients immediately.

Quality control testing was conducted by assessing samples taken during the culture period and the final product for sterility by the BacT/ALERT (bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA) microbiological detection system and for mycoplasma contamination by a MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Sterility tests were contracted to FALCO Biosystems (Kyoto, Japan). The viability of expanded cells was measured by trypan blue exclusion assay, and tested for endotoxin by a kinetic colorimetric LAL assay. After thawing, a small aliquot of the final product was used for in vitro cytotoxicity assay; it was cryo-preserved and examined to identify the proportions of CD3CD56+ cells and other cell surface markers by flow cytometry.

Treatment protocol

The eligibility criteria for transferred cells was as follows: The cultured cell viability was more than 80 %. The mean purity value of the three cultured cells was more than 50 %. The number of transferred cells was 70–130 % of the number that was set in each cohort. The patients were divided into three cohorts of three to four patients each: Cohort 1, 0.5 × 109 cells per dose; Cohort 2, 1.0 × 109 cells per dose; and Cohort 3, 2.0 × 109 cells per dose. Expanded NK cells that passed quality tests were intravenously injected for 60 min on days 0, 7, 14 (Fig. 1). We investigated the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring over a 28-day period after the third cell infusion. DLT was defined as grade ≥3 for any adverse event related to the administration of cultured cells. If no DLT was observed in the previous cohort, another cohort was treated at the next higher dose. There was no intra-patient dose escalation in this study.
Fig. 1

Treatment protocol. PBMCs were separated to prepare RN-T as stimulator cells. One week later, PBMCs were again separated similarly, and re-suspended in culture medium supplemented with heat-inactivated autologous plasma, IL-2 and OK-432. RN-T cells were added to the same flask or culture bag on day 0 and day 7. On days 21–22, the cultured cells were harvested and administered to the patients immediately. Expanded NK cells were intravenously injected for 60 min on days 0, 7, 14 in a dose-escalating manner (dose 0.5 × 109, 1 × 109, 2 × 109 cells/injection, three patients/one cohort). We investigated the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring over a 28-day period after the last administration of cultured cells. Blood samplings for immune monitoring were done just before the 1st and 3rd administration and 4 weeks after the 3rd administration. PBMCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells, RN-T cells RetroNectin®-induced T cells

Phenotypic analysis

The phenotype of expanded cells and PBMCs at baseline (day 0), before the 3rd administration (day 14), and 4 weeks after 3rd administration (day 42) were analyzed by flow cytometry. Monoclonal antibodies specific for CD3, CD16, CD56 (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA), NKG2D (eBioscience, CA, USA), CXCR3 (R&D system, MN, USA), CXCR4 (Becton–Dickinson, CA, USA), CX3CR1 (Bio Legend, CA, USA) were applied. Each monoclonal antibody was conjugated as follows: CD3 CD16, CD69, CXCR3 with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-, CD56, NKG2D, CXCR4, CX3CR1 with phycoerythrin (PE)-, CD3 with phycoerythrin-Cyanin 5 (PE-Cy5)-, CD56 with phycoerythrin-Cyanin 7 (PC7-Cy7)-. Cells were analyzed by Cytomics FC500 (Beckman Coulter) and data were acquired by the CXP software, version 2.2 (Beckman Coulter) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Whole blood cytokine assay

Blood samples were obtained from patients on day 0 and on day 42 after the 3rd administration. All plasma samples were stored at −80 °C until they were analyzed. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, we used a Bio-Plex multiplex cytokine array system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA) with a panel that quantified the following 27 cytokines: IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-13, IL-15, IL-17, basic FGF, eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IP-10, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, PDGF-BB, RANTES, TNF-α, VEGF. Data acquisition and analysis were performed with Bio-Plex Manager Software (version 5.0).

In vitro cytotoxicity assay

Blood samplings for in vitro cytotoxicity assay were done on day 0, before the 3rd administration (day 14) and on 42 days after the 3rd administration (4 weeks). To evaluate the cytotoxicity of expanded NK cells (final products) fresh PBMCs against K-562 cell as target cell was assayed using DELFIA® cell cytotoxicity kit (PerkinElmer, USA, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, PBMCs were added to the well in RPMI 1640 medium with 10 % FCS and incubated for 18 h. Target cells were labeled with Europium-DTPA, and then placed in 96-well tissue culture plates then incubated with PBMCs at various effector-to-target (E:T) ratios. After incubating for 4 h at 37 °C under 5 % CO2, the release of Europium-DTPA was measured in a time-resolved fluorometer. Cytotoxicity was calculated as follows: % cytotoxicity = 100 × (experimental release − spontaneous release)/(maximum release − spontaneous release). Calcein-AM(Takara Bio) was used to measure cytotoxicity in cryopreserved expanded NK cells instead of Europium-DTPA, and thawed expanded NK cells was mixed with fluorescent-labeled target cells without pre-incubation. Finally, we calculated the values corresponding to the E:T ratio needed to reduce the cytotoxicity of expanded NK cells by 50 % of the maximum lysis value (EC50).

Clinical toxicity and efficacy assessment

Safety and toxicity were determined based on regular patient interviews, physical examination and laboratory tests. Safety was assessed and reported according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Objective tumor response was assessed by computed tomography scans in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST VERSION 1.1) criteria. Disease assessment was performed at baseline and every 4 weeks after the final treatment.

Statistical analysis

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare paired samples before and after NK cell therapy and Spearman’s rank correlation tested the association between the two. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 for Windows (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Between September 2012 and June 2013, fourteen patients (11 males and 3 females) were enrolled in this trial. Table 1 shows patient demographics and clinical characteristics. The median age was 65.3 years (range 48–78). Seven (50.0 %) patients had colorectal cancer, four (28.6 %) had esophageal cancer, and three (21.4 %) had gastric cancer. Two patients in cohort 1 were removed from the study because the purity (no. 1, mean 30 %) or the number (no. 2) of expanded cells did not meet the minimum criteria (0.35 × 109 cells per dose). Two patients whose PS was 2 (no. 4 from cohort 1 and no. 10 from cohort 2), had disease progression during the NK cells preparation period and therefore received only two administration of NK cells.
Table 1

Patient characteristics

Cohort

Case

Age/gender

Diagnosis

Disease stage

ECOG/PS

Prior treatment

Combined treatment (chemotherapy)

NK cell administration

1

1

57/M

Rectal cancer

Recurrent

1

Surgery, chemotherapy

None

Excluded from triala

2

74/F

Rectal cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy

S-1

Excluded from triala

3

61/M

Esophageal cancer

Metastatic

2

Chemotherapy, radiation therapy

None

Complete

4

62/M

Gastric cancer

Recurrent

2

Surgery, chemotherapy

S-1

Incomplete (2 times)

5

72/M

Esophageal cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy

None

Complete

6

73/M

Colon cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy

None

Complete

7

66/M

Gastric cancer

Metastatic

0

Chemotherapy

None

Complete

2

8

62/M

Esophageal cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy

None

Complete

9

65/M

Colon cancer

Metastatic

0

Chemotherapy

S-1

Complete

10

67/M

Esophageal cancer

Metastatic

2

Chemotherapy, radiation therapy

None

Incomplete (2 times)

11

69/M

Gastric cancer

Metastatic

0

Chemotherapy

None

Complete

3

12

60/M

Colon cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy

None

Complete

13

78/F

Rectal cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy

None

Complete

14

48/F

Rectal cancer

Recurrent

0

Surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy

None

Complete

ECOG Eastern Coorperative Oncology Group, PS performance status

aTwo patients were excluded from trial because the purity (no. 1) or the number (no. 2) of expanded cells didn’t exceed eligible value

Characteristics of expanded NK cells

PBMCs from 14 enrolled patients were cultured. The median of NK cell (CD3CD56+) in lymphocytes was 13.59 % (range 4.43–34.85). The median of total cell or NK cell expansion rate after 21 and 22 days of culture was 586-fold (range 95–1102) and 4720-fold (range 1372–14,116), respectively (Fig. 2a). The total cell expansion fold did not correlate with the percentage of NK cells in lymphocytes (ρ = 0.24, P = 0.40), but in the 1st culture it significantly correlated with the cytotoxicity activity of PBMCs on day 0 (ρ = 0.66, P = 0.04, Fig. 2b). As shown in Fig. 2c, the purity of expanded NK (CD3CD56+) cells markedly increased after culture, with the exception of one patient (Pt no. 1). The median purity of NK cell (CD3CD56+) was 90.96 % (range 65.94–99.45) in the intention-to treat (ITT) population and 96.14 % (range 65.94–99.45) in the per protocol (PP) population. As shown in Table 2 however, the percentage of CD3+CD56+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ cells was minimal (median 8.60, 3.50 and 0.24 %, respectively). Expanded NK cells highly expressed cell surface markers such as NKG2D and CD16, which are considered viable and functional markers of NK cells. In the ITT population, the median percentage of NKG2D+ and CD16+ cells in NK population was 98.36 % (range 95.20–99.59) and 61.75 % (range 20.84–73.50), respectively. We also found relatively high expression levels of chemokine receptors such as CXCR3, CXCR4 and CX3CR1 on expanded NK cells (median in ITT population, 45.47, 37.71, and 43.74 %, respectively). Additional file 2: Figure S1 shows representative flow cytometry dot-plots for each population of expanded cells in patient no. 14.
Fig. 2

Expansion and NK purity dynamics of PBMCs obtained from 14 patients. a Fold expansion of total cell and NK cell population (CD3CD56+ cell) during the culture period. Dots represent mean values of each patient in triplicate cultures. Horizontal bars indicate median values. b Relation of NK cell expansion fold and cytotoxic activity of PBMCs. Expansion fold of NK cells in the first culture significantly correlated with cytotoxic activity of PBMCs at baseline (ρ = 0.661, p = 0.044). PBMCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells. c The purity of NK cell population (CD3CD56+ cell) at baseline and 21 or 22 days after the initiation of the culture

Table 2

Characteristics of expanded cells

Patient no.

CD3CD56+

CD3+CD56+

CD3+CD4+

CD3+CD8+

NKG2D+ in CD3CD56+

CD16+ in CD3CD56+

CXCR3+ in CD3CD56+

CXCR4+ in CD3CD56+

CX3CR1+ in CD3CD56+

NK activity EC50a

1

30.18

62.53

NE

NE

NE

NE

NE

NE

NE

2.61

2

98.41

0.93

0.40

0.24

98.91

23.01

28.33

49.79

36.79

1.31

3

81.78

16.28

17.15

0.96

96.70

20.84

48.80

21.98

28.33

1.31

4

98.75

0.91

0.55

0.13

96.28

29.47

36.67

29.78

28.37

1.61

5

72.84

26.50

25.49

1.87

99.59

68.39

44.82

20.32

39.51

0.63

6

95.67

3.93

3.12

0.30

99.36

60.70

56.62

23.31

42.07

0.62

7

86.25

13.27

3.87

0.24

95.20

50.29

29.04

31.34

26.79

1.39

8

96.60

2.27

2.25

0.07

98.54

60.46

42.90

62.89

50.40

1.24

9

84.91

14.91

10.31

2.64

98.17

72.33

41.80

37.88

62.01

0.98

10

65.94

38.83

33.61

0.23

98.67

62.79

44.04

42.40

51.40

1.88

11

98.49

1.39

0.45

0.11

99.45

69.23

49.69

69.29

44.33

1.76

12

78.52

21.40

11.43

0.30

97.88

73.50

61.05

37.54

70.20

1.99

13

97.23

2.57

2.60

0.11

99.00

32.88

57.66

49.55

54.89

0.59

14

99.45

0.44

0.28

0.09

97.82

63.59

46.12

43.73

43.15

0.39

Median (all enrolled patients)

90.96

8.60

3.12

0.24

98.54

60.70

44.82

37.88

43.15

1.31

Median (ITT population)

90.96

8.60

3.50

0.24

98.36

61.75

45.47

37.71

43.74

1.28

aThe data are presented for EC50, which means the values corresponding to the E:T ratio needed to reduce the cytotoxicity by 50 % from maximum lysis

We directly tested the cytotoxicity of each patient’s final product using the standard K-562 cells which is a NK-sensitive target. Expanded cells from all patients exerted strong cytotoxic activity against K-562 cells (Fig. 3). At a 6.25:1 effector to target cell ratio, 90.29 % of the K562 targets on average were killed by the expanded cells, and median EC50 value was 1.31 (range 0.39–2.61, Table 2). Representative data from patient no. 5, whose EC50 value was 0.63, appears in Additional file 3: Figure S2.
Fig. 3

Cytotoxic activity of expanded NK cells against K-562 cells. 4 h cytotoxicity from 14 patients against K-562 target cells. Mean cell death in each patient at the indicated E:T ratios in triplicate cultures

Safety assessment

The overall toxicity in the 12 ITT patients who were administered NK cells more than twice, is summarized in Table 3. No patient showed toxicity that exceeded grade 3. We observed one patient with grade 3 lymphopenia (no. 3), one patient with grade 3 anorexia (no. 10) and one patient with grade 2 pleuritis (no. 8). These adverse events were caused by cancer progression. Grade 3 anorexia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and total bilirubin elevation were observed in one patient (no. 4). These adverse events were caused by bone marrow carcinomatosis and obstructive jaundice brought on by the progression of gastric cancer. Grade 3 neutropenia and anemia was observed in one patient (no. 11) administered with S-1. These hematological toxicities were transient and were alleviated by drug withdrawal. Grade 1 fever elevation and fatigue associated with NK cell infusion was observed in one patient. The frequency and severity of toxicity did not increase with dose escalation of infused cells, and there were no severe or unexpected toxicity related to the NK cell infusion. Thus, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached.
Table 3

Maximum toxicity per patient

Toxicity

Cohort 1 (n = 5)

Cohort 2 (n = 4)

Cohort 3 (n = 3)

All cohort (n = 12)

Grade

Grade

Grade

Grade

1–2

3

1–2

3

1–2

3

1–2

3

Hematological

 Neutropenia

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

 Lymphopenia

3

1

3

0

0

0

6

1

 Anemia

3

1

3

1

2

0

8

2

 Thrombocytopenia

2

1

1

0

0

0

3

1

 Elevated AST

2

0

1

0

0

0

3

0

 Elevated ALT

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

 Elevated total billirubin

0

1

2

0

1

0

3

1

Non-hematological

 Fatigue

2

0

3

0

3

0

8

0

 Fever

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

 Anorexia

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

2

 Nausea

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

0

 Diarrhea

0

0

2

0

0

0

2

0

 Constipation

1

0

2

0

0

0

3

0

Clinical efficacy

The evaluation of clinical outcome is shown in Table 4. No patient showed tumor shrinkage during the observation period up to 4 weeks after their last treatment. Of the 12 ITT patients, 5 (41.7 %) presented stable disease (SD) and 7 (58.3 %) presented progressive disease (PD). Of the 10 PP patients, 5 (50 %) presented SD and 5 (50 %) presented PD. Thus, in the PP analysis, the response rate and the disease control rate (DCR, complete response + partial response + SD) in this study were 0 and 50.0 %, respectively.
Table 4

Tumor response

No. of patients

Response

Response rate (%) (95 % CI)

Disease control rate (%) (95 % CI)

CR

PR

SD

PD

ITT population n = 12

0

0

5

7

0 (0)

41.7 (15.17–72.33)

PP population n = 10

0

0

5

5

0 (0)

50.0 (18.71–81.29)

ITT intention -to-treat, PP per protocol, CR complete response, PR Partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease, 95 %CI 95 % confidence interval

Immunological monitoring

Immunological monitoring was performed for per protocol evaluable patients using their PBMCs before and after the NK cells infusion. As indicated in Fig. 4a and Additional file 4: Table S2, the average NK cell population in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs) slightly increased until day 42 after NK cell infusion. Evaluated by cohort, the population of NK cells in cohort 2 and 3 increased after the infusion of NK cells, whereas there was a gradual decrease in cohort 1 (Fig. 4b). Next, we tested the cytotoxicity of PBMCs against K-562 targets and found that cytotoxicity increased in 80 % of patients after NK cell infusion (Additional file 5: Table S3). On day 14, average PBMC cytotoxic increased more than twice the day 0 baseline value; while it gradually decreased, it remained higher than day 0 until day 42 (Fig. 5a). This change in PBMC cytotoxic activity was similar across all cohorts and seemed to be independent of the number of cells that were infused. However, PBMC cytotoxic activity differed according to objective tumor response, and the average in patients with SD increased more than three times on day 14 and was much higher than in patients with PD (Fig. 5b). Cytokine serum levels did not change significantly after NK cell infusion (Table 5).
Fig. 4

Longitudinal plots of NK cell population in PBLs plotted according to their deviation from the baseline. Mean levels in all patients (a) and levels in each cohort (b) are shown. PBLs peripheral blood lymphocytes

Fig. 5

Longitudinal plots of cytotoxic activity of PBMCs against K-562 cells plotted according to the deviation from the baseline. Mean levels in all patients at indicated E:T ratios (a blue 20:1, red 40:1) and levels for the tumor responses at 40:1 E/T ratio (b) are shown. PBMCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease

Table 5

Serum cytokines concentration before and after NK cell therapy

 

Baseline (day 0) (pg/ml)

Post administration (day 42) (pg/ml)

p value

IL-1β

4.007 ± 7.155

6.438 ± 13.22

0.25

IL-1RA

893.3 ± 2154

983.0 ± 2550

1

IL-2

37.16 ± 22.54

37.45 ± 29.48

0.8203

IL-4

2.456 ± 0.6683

2.600 ± 0.7691

0.4961

IL-5

4.029 ± 2.191

4.171 ± 3.156

1

IL-6

38.62 ± 47.26

45.43 ± 58.69

0.3594

IL-7

3.827 ± 3.984

4.724 ± 6.224

0.8203

IL-8

26.94 ± 9.571

30.73 ± 16.71

0.4258

IL-9

31.33 ± 28.77

32.87 ± 37.69

0.4258

IL-10

26.28 ± 30.72

27.71 ± 39.37

0.3008

IL-12p70

37.28 ± 50.31

47.22 ± 83.46

0.9102

IL-13

14.87 ± 21.99

19.05 ± 36.70

0.8203

IL-15

44.33 ± 20.73

43.67 ± 28.17

0.8203

IL-17

199.2 ± 89.43

185.1 ± 109.2

0.4961

IFN-γ

92.13 ± 119.4

105.4 ± 141.8

0.3594

TNF-α

32.04 ± 45.28

38.69 ± 59.64

0.0977

bFGF

51.92 ± 31.51

53.38 ± 45.84

0.7344

PDGF-BB

172.2 ± 108.3

191.0 ± 219.0

0.9102

G-CSF

55.23 ± 26.89

58.08 ± 40.79

0.9102

GM-CSF

90.58 ± 75.85

94.29 ± 97.23

0.7344

IP-10

287.1 ± 40.88

389.2 ± 204.4

0.3008

MCP-1

133.6 ± 33.18

122.1 ± 52.29

0.2031

MIP-1α

4.972 ± 3.239

4.214 ± 2.073

0.1641

MIP-1β

275.0 ± 86.68

300.6 ± 154.0

1

Eotaxin

116.4 ± 193.8

123.2 ± 233.4

0.7344

RANTES

2157 ± 396.8

2445 ± 580.7

0.2031

VEGF

92.02 ± 30.85

113.2 ± 79.16

0.9102

Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. The paired t test was used to determine statistical differences

NS not significant

Discussion

In this phase I clinical trial consisting of advanced digestive cancer patients, we explored the safety and feasibility of adoptive transfer of NK cells elicited by a novel expansion method using RN-T cells. We generated pure (median 90.96 %) NK cells on a large scale without prior purification. These cells expressed activating markers such as NKG2D and CD16 implicated in cytotoxicity and ADCC activity and exerted strong cytotoxic activity against K-562 cells in vitro. Not only did our proposed method produce fully functional NK cells in large numbers, the process was safe, well tolerated and highly reproducible.

NK cells occur in low numbers in PBMCs and obtaining the number necessary for adoptive transfer of NK cells is technically challenging. Unlike T cells, which readily respond to a variety of stimuli, it is generally difficult to expand NK cells from a small amount of blood from patients with advanced cancer who in general tend to have impaired immune function. There are few previous reports in which a NK cell expansion method produced pure cells in sufficient quantities from a small amount of blood without prior purification of the NK cells [26]. IL-2 can induce proliferative responses in human NK cells, but as suggested by existing reports, it can induce up to a 50-fold expansion after being cultured for 2 weeks [2729]. Recently, Alici et al. reported that anti-CD3 and IL-2 induced 1600-fold NK expansions after 20 days from the blood of patients with myeloma [30]. However, the cytotoxicity of these cells against K562 cells was <10 % at 1:1 E/T ratio [30], which is much lower than the results achieved in this present in vitro study (average cytotoxicity 57.54 or 38.77 % at 1.56:1 or 0.75:1 E/T ratio).

We observed that chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CX3CR1 were relatively highly expressed in expanded NK cells, with a median in the ITT population, of 45.47, 37.71, 43.74 % respectively. These molecules are considered to be involved in the accumulation of intratumoral NK cells [3134]. Thus, the NK cells elicited by our system are believed to have excellent properties as adoptive transferred cell in cancer immunotherapy. The percentage of CD16+ NK cells in the final product was relatively low compared to that observed in our previous study (average 55.4 vs 96.8 %) [25]. We observed by flow cytometer that CD16 expression on NK cells decreased approximately 30 % after being thawed and this may be attributed to us using thawed samples in the present study, whereas fresh samples were analyzed in our previous study.

Although no clinical responses were observed in 10 PP patients, the in vitro cytotoxicity of PBMCs against K-562 targets increased in 80 % of patients post adoptive NK cell transfer. The average cytotoxic activity on day 14 increased more than two times after NK cells infusion, and the increase continued until day 42 post-transfer. In their clinical trial for patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell carcinoma, Parkhurst et al. documented the persistence, function and phenotype of autologous NK cells after adoptive transfer [35]. In their study, the peripheral blood lymphocyte 1 week post treatment consisted of an average of 83 % NK cells, which was much higher than in our clinical study (21 % at 2 weeks post-transfer). This difference in results probably stems from the higher number of transferred cells used in their clinical trial (47 × 109 per dose) versus the current trial (0.5 or 1.0 or 2.0 × 109 per dose). Additionally, their study involved lymph depleting chemotherapy and systemic IL-2 administration combined with NK cell transfer; these procedures were not done in our trial.

As previously mentioned, the focus of this clinical trial was to assess the safety of the NK cells produced with our expansion method. These cells had a relatively high level of functionality which made them promising however, we felt it was also important to know their level of toxicity before focusing on their efficacy. For this reason, although studies like those presented above have received better efficacy with combined treatment such as lymph depletion and any cytokine support, we chose a monotherapy where a relatively small number of NK cells were administered as the best option to assess the safety of the expanded cells.

To overcome the limited clinical efficacy of NK cell-based monotherapy, several strategies have been suggested including the combination of various monoclonal antibodies [26]. Within the setting of NK cell-based therapy, much attention has been given to the KIR-ligand mismatch phenomenon. Lack of KIR-HLA class I interactions has been associated with potent NK-mediated antitumor efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia patients upon haplo-identical stem cell transplantation [36] or NK cells infusion [6, 37] from KIR mismatched donors. Thus, a KIR ligand-mismatched donor is likely to provide the best chance for clinical response. Adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells from a KIR ligand-mismatched donor elicited by our novel method is expected to offer advantages over autologous NK cells. Since our method does not stimulate T cell proliferation, this could be an important clinical advantage because it avoids the risk of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic NK cell therapy. Immune checkpoint blockade with antibodies to CTLA-4 and PD-1 represents a promising cancer therapy that aims to restore an efficient antitumoral response mediated by T cell [38]. As a corollary to targeting negative regulators of T cells, blocking inhibitory signals of NK cells with anti-KIR [39] or anti-Tim-3 [40] antibodies is also an attractive therapy to combine with NK cell therapy. CD16 expression of expanded NK cells produced in our study is relatively high. Therefore, adoptive transfer of these NK cells combined with tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies has the potential to trigger strong ADCC responses. This type of combined therapy with IgG1 monoclonal antibodies is likely to be promising. Having confirmed that our expanded cells are safe to administer, we are currently conducting clinical trials combining them with cetuximab for colorectal cancer and trastuzumab for gastric cancer patients in order to assess their efficacy. (The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry ID: UMIN000013378).

Conclusion

We have shown that our novel NK expansion system using RN-T cells is effective at producing large numbers of fully functional NK cells that are pure. The data here also demonstrates that adoptive transfer of these NK cells is safe and very well tolerated by patients who had failed standard cancer therapy. NK cell transfer as a monotherapy is generally unsatisfactory and although no clinical responses were observed in patients, knowing that these cells can be safely administered will allow us to make an attempt at improving their efficacy by combining them with other reagents. We believe that these expanded cells have the potential to be efficacious in a combination treatment, since we observed that transferred NK cells persisted in the peripheral circulation of patients and exerted cytotoxicity in vitro. The NK cell expansion method suggested here could be applied to various NK cell-based therapies and can be combined with a range of treatment modalities. The advantage of our novel NK cell generation method can be summarized as follows: (1) large number of highly pure and functional cells (2) no need for purification including the use of a magnetic beads sorting system (3) improved safety through the use of autologous RN-T cells rather than transgenic or cancer cells as a stimulator (4) requires only a small amount of blood (5) requires low-serum culture conditions (0.5–1.0 %) and (6) high reproducibility. We believe that this expansion method is an innovative tool for NK cell-based cancer immunotherapy.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NS TI SK TE JM. Performed the experiments: NS TI SK TE MI FS AK TO. Analyzed the data: NA TI TE MI. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NS TE MI FS AK MT KO. Wrote the paper: NS TI. Intellectual input and data analysis support: YN YI TY. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of Iseikai Hyakumanben Clinic for their efforts in the successful completion of this study. We are also grateful to Yangryong Kim, Takako Ozaki, and Saeko Tsuchiya for diligently overseeing the patients in this study. This work was partially funded by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI C) (No. 26460914, No. 26830112 and No. 25460958) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests Takeshi Ishikawa, Tetsuya Okayama, and Toshikazu Yoshikawa are affiliated with a department funded by donations from TAKARA BIO Inc. Yuji Naito received scholarship funds from Eisai Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
(2)
Department of Cancer ImmunoCell Regulation, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine
(3)
Iseikai Hyakumanben Clinic
(4)
Center for Education Research and Development, Kyoto Gakuen University
(5)
CDM Center, Takara Bio Inc

References

  1. Ljunggren HG, Malmberg KJ (2007) Prospects for the use of NK cells in immunotherapy of human cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 7:329–339PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A, Caligiuri MA, Zitvogel L, Lanier LL, Yokoyama WM, Ugolini S (2011) Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 331:44–49PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Madjd Z, Spendlove I, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Durrant LG (2005) Total loss of MHC class I is an independent indicator of good prognosis in breast cancer. Int J Cancer J Int du Cancer 117:248–255View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Ramnath N, Tan D, Li Q, Hylander BL, Bogner P, Ryes L, Ferrone S (2006) Is downregulation of MHC class I antigen expression in human non-small cell lung cancer associated with prolonged survival? Cancer Immunol Immunother CII 55:891–899PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Watzl C, Long EO (2000) Exposing tumor cells to killer cell attack. Nat Med 6:867–868PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, McKenna D, Le C, Defor TE, Burns LJ, Orchard PJ, Blazar BR et al (2005) Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood 105:3051–3057PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Ribeiro RC, Pounds S, Rooney B, Bell T, Pui CH, Leung W (2010) NKAML: a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28:955–959View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Geller MA, Cooley S, Judson PL, Ghebre R, Carson LF, Argenta PA, Jonson AL, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Curtsinger J, McKenna D, Dusenbery K, Bliss R et al (2011) A phase II study of allogeneic natural killer cell therapy to treat patients with recurrent ovarian and breast cancer. Cytotherapy 13:98–107PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Arai S, Meagher R, Swearingen M, Myint H, Rich E, Martinson J, Klingemann H (2008) Infusion of the allogeneic cell line NK-92 in patients with advanced renal cell cancer or melanoma: a phase I trial. Cytotherapy 10:625–632PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. deMagalhaes-Silverman M, Donnenberg A, Lembersky B, Elder E, Lister J, Rybka W, Whiteside T, Ball E (2000) Posttransplant adoptive immunotherapy with activated natural killer cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Immunother 23:154–160PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Krause SW, Gastpar R, Andreesen R, Gross C, Ullrich H, Thonigs G, Pfister K, Multhoff G (2004) Treatment of colon and lung cancer patients with ex vivo heat shock protein 70-peptide-activated, autologous natural killer cells: a clinical phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 10:3699–3707View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Iliopoulou EG, Kountourakis P, Karamouzis MV, Doufexis D, Ardavanis A, Baxevanis CN, Rigatos G, Papamichail M, Perez SA (2010) A phase I trial of adoptive transfer of allogeneic natural killer cells in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother CII 59:1781–1789PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ishikawa T, Kokura S, Enoki T, Sakamoto N, Okayama T, Ideno M, Mineno J, Uno K, Yoshida N, Kamada K, Katada K, Uchiyama K et al (2014) Phase I clinical trial of fibronectin CH296-stimulated T cell therapy in patients with advanced cancer. PLoS One 9:e83786PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Yee C (2010) Adoptive therapy using antigen-specific T-cell clones. Cancer J 16:367–373PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Naume B, Gately M, Espevik T (1992) A comparative study of IL-12 (cytotoxic lymphocyte maturation factor)-, IL-2-, and IL-7-induced effects on immunomagnetically purified CD56+ NK cells. J Immunol 148:2429–2436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carson WE, Fehniger TA, Haldar S, Eckhert K, Lindemann MJ, Lai CF, Croce CM, Baumann H, Caligiuri MA (1997) A potential role for interleukin-15 in the regulation of human natural killer cell survival. J Clin Investig 99:937–943PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Perussia B, Ramoni C, Anegon I, Cuturi MC, Faust J, Trinchieri G (1987) Preferential proliferation of natural killer cells among peripheral blood mononuclear cells cocultured with B lymphoblastoid cell lines. Nat Immun Cell Growth Regul 6:171–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McKenna DH Jr, Sumstad D, Bostrom N, Kadidlo DM, Fautsch S, McNearney S, Dewaard R, McGlave PB, Weisdorf DJ, Wagner JE, McCullough J, Miller JS (2007) Good manufacturing practices production of natural killer cells for immunotherapy: a 6-year single-institution experience. Transfusion 47:520–528PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Koehl U, Brehm C, Huenecke S, Zimmermann SY, Kloess S, Bremm M, Ullrich E, Soerensen J, Quaiser A, Erben S, Wunram C, Gardlowski T et al (2013) Clinical grade purification and expansion of NK cell products for an optimized manufacturing protocol. Front Oncol 3:118PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Peragine N, Torelli GF, Mariglia P, Pauselli S, Vitale A, Guarini A, Foà R (2015) Immunophenotypic and functional characterization of ex vivo expanded natural killer cells for clinical use in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 64(2):201–211PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Spanholtz J, Tordoir M, Eissens D, Preijers F, van der Meer A, Joosten I, Schaap N, de Witte TM, Dolstra H (2010) High log-scale expansion of functional human natural killer cells from umbilical cord blood CD34-positive cells for adoptive cancer immunotherapy. PLoS One 5:e9221PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Ayello J, van de Ven C, Cairo E, Hochberg J, Baxi L, Satwani P, Cairo MS (2009) Characterization of natural killer and natural killer-like T cells derived from ex vivo expanded and activated cord blood mononuclear cells: implications for adoptive cellular immunotherapy. Exp Hematol 37:1216–1229PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Fujisaki H, Kakuda H, Shimasaki N, Imai C, Ma J, Lockey T, Eldridge P, Leung WH, Campana D (2009) Expansion of highly cytotoxic human natural killer cells for cancer cell therapy. Cancer Res 69:4010–4017PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Luhm J, Brand JM, Koritke P, Höppner M, Kirchner H, Frohn C (2002) Large-scale generation of natural killer lymphocytes for clinical application. J Hematother Stem Cell Res 11(4):651–657PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ideno M, Kato A, Enoki T, Sakamoto N, Ishikawa T, Okayama T, Kokura S, Kitagawa M, Mineno J (2014) A robust and selective expansion method for functional NK cells and its application for in vivo ADCC evaluation system The 5th meeting of Asian Cellular Therapy Organization Osaka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  26. Sutlu T, Alici E (2009) Natural killer cell-based immunotherapy in cancer: current insights and future prospects. J Intern Med 266:154–181PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Melder RJ, Whiteside TL, Vujanovic NL, Hiserodt JC, Herberman RB (1988) A new approach to generating antitumor effectors for adoptive immunotherapy using human adherent lymphokine-activated killer cells. Cancer Res 48:3461–3469PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Whiteside TL, Wang YL, Selker RG, Herberman RB (1988) In vitro generation and antitumor activity of adherent lymphokine-activated killer cells from the blood of patients with brain tumors. Cancer Res 48:6069–6075PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vujanovic NL, Rabinowich H, Lee YJ, Jost L, Herberman RB, Whiteside TL (1993) Distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics of human natural killer cells obtained by rapid interleukin 2-induced adherence to plastic. Cell Immunol 151:133–157PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Alici E, Sutlu T, Bjorkstrand B, Gilljam M, Stellan B, Nahi H, Quezada HC, Gahrton G, Ljunggren HG, Dilber MS (2008) Autologous antitumor activity by NK cells expanded from myeloma patients using GMP-compliant components. Blood 111:3155–3162PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Bazan JF, Bacon KB, Hardiman G, Wang W, Soo K, Rossi D, Greaves DR, Zlotnik A, Schall TJ (1997) A new class of membrane-bound chemokine with a CX3C motif. Nature 385:640–644PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. El-Shazly A, Berger P, Girodet PO, Ousova O, Fayon M, Vernejoux JM, Marthan R, Tunon-de-Lara JM (2006) Fraktalkine produced by airway smooth muscle cells contributes to mast cell recruitment in asthma. J Immunol 176:1860–1868PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Imai T, Hieshima K, Haskell C, Baba M, Nagira M, Nishimura M, Kakizaki M, Takagi S, Nomiyama H, Schall TJ, Yoshie O (1997) Identification and molecular characterization of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which mediates both leukocyte migration and adhesion. Cell 91:521–530PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Wendel M, Galani IE, Suri-Payer E, Cerwenka A (2008) Natural killer cell accumulation in tumors is dependent on IFN-gamma and CXCR3 ligands. Cancer Res 68:8437–8445PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Parkhurst MR, Riley JP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA (2011) Adoptive transfer of autologous natural killer cells leads to high levels of circulating natural killer cells but does not mediate tumor regression. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res 17:6287–6297View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, Posati S, Rogaia D, Frassoni F, Aversa F, Martelli MF, Velardi A (2002) Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science 295:2097–2100PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruggeri L, Mancusi A, Capanni M, Martelli MF, Velardi A (2005) Exploitation of alloreactive NK cells in adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Curr Opin Immunol 17:211–217PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK, Postow MA, Rizvi NA, Lesokhin AM, Segal NH, Ariyan CE, Gordon RA, Reed K, Burke MM, Caldwell A et al (2013) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369:122–133PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kohrt HE, Thielens A, Marabelle A, Sagiv-Barfi I, Sola C, Chanuc F, Fuseri N, Bonnafous C, Czerwinski D, Rajapaksa A, Waller E, Ugolini S et al (2014) Anti-KIR antibody enhancement of anti-lymphoma activity of natural killer cells as monotherapy and in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies. Blood 123:678–686PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. da Silva IP, Gallois A, Jimenez-Baranda S, Khan S, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, Osman I, Bhardwaj N (2014) Reversal of NK-cell exhaustion in advanced melanoma by Tim-3 blockade. Cancer Immunol Res 2:410–422PubMedView ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sakamoto et al. 2015

Advertisement