- Open Access
Boosting high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced anti-tumor immunity using a sparse-scan strategy that can more effectively promote dendritic cell maturation
- Fang Liu†1,
- Zhenlin Hu†1,
- Lei Qiu1,
- Chun Hui2,
- Chao Li2,
- Pei Zhong3Email author and
- Junping Zhang1Email author
© Liu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 29 September 2009
- Accepted: 27 January 2010
- Published: 27 January 2010
The conventional treatment protocol in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy utilizes a dense-scan strategy to produce closely packed thermal lesions aiming at eradicating as much tumor mass as possible. However, this strategy is not most effective in terms of inducing a systemic anti-tumor immunity so that it cannot provide efficient micro-metastatic control and long-term tumor resistance. We have previously provided evidence that HIFU may enhance systemic anti-tumor immunity by in situ activation of dendritic cells (DCs) inside HIFU-treated tumor tissue. The present study was conducted to test the feasibility of a sparse-scan strategy to boost HIFU-induced anti-tumor immune response by more effectively promoting DC maturation.
An experimental HIFU system was set up to perform tumor ablation experiments in subcutaneous implanted MC-38 and B16 tumor with dense- or sparse-scan strategy to produce closely-packed or separated thermal lesions. DCs infiltration into HIFU-treated tumor tissues was detected by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. DCs maturation was evaluated by IL-12/IL-10 production and CD80/CD86 expression after co-culture with tumor cells treated with different HIFU. HIFU-induced anti-tumor immune response was evaluated by detecting growth-retarding effects on distant re-challenged tumor and tumor-specific IFN-γ-secreting cells in HIFU-treated mice.
HIFU exposure raised temperature up to 80 degrees centigrade at beam focus within 4 s in experimental tumors and led to formation of a well-defined thermal lesion. The infiltrated DCs were recruited to the periphery of lesion, where the peak temperature was only 55 degrees centigrade during HIFU exposure. Tumor cells heated to 55 degrees centigrade in 4-s HIFU exposure were more effective to stimulate co-cultured DCs to mature. Sparse-scan HIFU, which can reserve 55 degrees-heated tumor cells surrounding the separated lesions, elicited an enhanced anti-tumor immune response than dense-scan HIFU, while their suppressive effects on the treated primary tumor were maintained at the same level. Flow cytometry analysis showed that sparse-scan HIFU was more effective than dense-scan HIFU in enhancing DC infiltration into tumor tissues and promoting their maturation in situ.
Optimizing scan strategy is a feasible way to boost HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity by more effectively promoting DC maturation.
- Antitumor Immune Response
- HIFU Treatment
- Thermal Lesion
- HIFU Therapy
- HIFU Transducer
In recent years, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a new and promising treatment modality for a variety of cancers, including breast, prostate, kidney, liver, bone, uterus and pancreas cancers[5, 6]. By focusing acoustic energy in a small cigar-shaped volume inside the tumor, HIFU can rapidly raise the tissue temperature at its beam focus above 65°C, leading to cellular coagulative necrosis and thermal lesion formation in a well-defined region. In principle, HIFU can be applied to most internal organs with an appropriate acoustic window for ultrasound transmission except those with air-filled viscera such as lung or bowel. In particular, HIFU is advantageous in treating patients with unresectable cancers, such as pancreatic carcinoma, or with poor physical condition for surgery. Unlike radiation and chemotherapy, HIFU can be applied repetitively without the apprehension of accumulating systemic toxicity. This unique feature allows multiple HIFU sessions to be performed if local recurrence occurs. Clinical studies have already demonstrated promising outcome of HIFU treatment for several types of malignances, including prostate cancer, breast cancer, uterine fibroids, hepatocellular carcinomas, and bone malignances [7, 8]. Although some thermal (skin burn, damage to adjacent bones or nerves) and non-thermal (pain, fever, local infection, and bowel perforation) complications of HIFU treatment have been reported, most of the complications were minor and without severe adverse consequences[8, 9].
At present, the primary drawback of HIFU is that it cannot be used to kill micro-metastases outside the primary tumor site. In fact, distant metastasis is a major cause of mortality following clinical HIFU therapy. Lengthy treatment time also represents a limitation. Because each HIFU pulse generally creates an ablated spot of ~10 × 3 × 3 mm in size, up to 1000 lesions may need to be packed closely together during HIFU treatment by scanning the beam focus in a matrix of positions to cover entire tumor volume. With current treatment algorithms, this may translate into a procedure time exceeding 4 hours. Currently, the conventional HIFU treatment protocol in clinic utilizes a dense scanning pattern to eradicate as much tumor mass as possible. Nevertheless, local recurrence of the tumor, due to incomplete tissue necrosis, is still frequently observed following HIFU therapy[10, 11]. Clearly, the quality and effectiveness of HIFU cancer therapy need further improvement.
In addition to direct localized destruction of tumor tissues, preliminary evidence from several recent studies has suggested that HIFU may enhance host systemic anti-tumor immunity[12, 13]. Although the underlying mechanism is still largely unknown, the potential for a HIFU-elicited anti-tumor immunity is attractive and may help to control local recurrence and distant metastasis following thermal ablation of the primary tumor. On the other hand, the anti-tumor immune response reported in previous studies was not strong enough to achieve a therapeutic gain. As mentioned above, local tumor recurrence and distant metastasis are often the cause of failure for HIFU therapy[10, 12], indicating the need to augment the host anti-tumor immunity. Therefore, the optimized strategies that can reduce the primary tumor mass and elicit simultaneously a strong anti-tumor immune response are highly desirable.
The induction and maintenance of an effective antitumor immune response is critically dependent on dendritic cells (DCs), the most effective antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that capture antigens in peripheral tumor tissues and migrate to secondary lymphoid organs, where they cross-present the captured antigens to T cells and activate them. To act as potent APCs, DCs must undergo maturation, a state characterized by the upregulation of MHC and costimulatory molecules and the production of cytokines such as IL-12. However, the requisite signals for DC maturation are often absent from the bed of poorly immunogenic tumors, and many tumor cells even actively produce immunosuppressive cytokines such as VEGF to suppress DC function. Thus, DCs infiltrated in tumor tissues typically exhibit a ''suppressed'' phenotype, and show significantly reduced ability to stimulate allogeneic T cells when compared with normal DCs. Such alterations in DCs development and function are associated with tumor escape from immune-mediated surveillance[16, 17]. On the other hand, several studies have demonstrated that dying tumor cells responding to chemotherapy or radiotherapy can express 'danger' and 'eat me' signals such as heat-shock proteins (HSPs) on the cell surface or release intracellular HSP molecules to stimulate DCs to mature and elicit a strong anti-tumor immune response. In the setting of HIFU therapy, we have demonstrated in vitro that HIFU treatment results in the release endogenous immunostimulatory factors from tumor cells and stimulates DCs to mature. We have further provided evidence that HIFU can stimulate DCs to infiltrate into tumor tissues, migrate to draining lymph nodes after being activated, and subsequently elicit tumor-specific CTL responses. Based on these observations, we have postulated that in situ activation of DCs inside HIFU-treated tumor tissue may constitute an important mechanism for HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity. Given the central role of DCs maturation in the development of anti-tumor immune response, it is reasonable to speculate that an optimized HIFU strategy that can more effectively activate DCs to mature should have potential to elicit a stronger anti-tumor immunity.
The present study was conducted to search for a feasible way to boost HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity by more effectively stimulating DCs to mature. To this end, we set up an experimental HIFU system and performed a series of tumor ablation experiments in subcutaneous implanted MC-38 and B16 tumor models. We found that the infiltrated DCs were mostly recruited to the periphery of thermal lesions after HIFU exposure and the tumor cells at the periphery of HIFU-induced thermal lesions could more effectively stimulated DCs to mature. Based on these finding, we further hypothesize a sparse-scan strategy that can produce separated thermal lesions and reserve surrounding peripheral tumor tissue may provide more stimuli for DC maturation than currently used dense-scan strategy, and finally enhance the strength of HIFU-induced systemic anti-tumor immune response. By comparing the tumor ablation efficiency and anti-tumor immune response elicited by two different HIFU treatment strategies, i.e., spare vs. dense scan, in well-controlled animal experiments, we demonstrated that it is actually feasible to boost HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity through optimizing HIFU scan strategy. Finally, we did ex vivo experiments to assess the number of tumor-infiltrating DCs and their maturation status in HIFU-treated tumor tissues and found that sparse-scan HIFU was more effective than dense-scan HIFU in enhancing infiltration of DCs into tumor tissues and promoting their maturation in situ.
MC-38 mouse colon adenocarcinoma tumor cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Timothy M. Clay of Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University (Durham, NC, USA). B16 mouse melanoma cell line and EL4 mouse lymphoma cell line were obtained from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology and Biochemistry (Shanghai, China). All of cell lines were maintained in complete Dulbeco's modified eagle medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, USA) at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Experimental animals and Tumor Model
C57BL/6 female mice, 5-8 weeks old, were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal CO. LTD (Shanghai, China). Tumor models were prepared by subcutaneously injecting 5 × 105 MC-38 or B16 tumor cells suspended in 50 μl of PBS in the left hindlimb of the C57BL/6 mice. The tumor was allowed to grow for 8 days to reach a diameter of 8-10 mm before HIFU treatment. All procedures involving animal treatment and their care in this study were approved by the animal care committee of the Second Military Medical University in Shanghai in accordance with institutional and Chinese government guidelines for animal experiments.
HIFU Exposure System
In vitro HIFU treatment of tumor cells was performed in a HIFU exposure system shown in Figure 1E. The HIFU transducer was mounted horizontally inside a water tank filled with degassed water. 1 × 105 tumor cells suspended in 20 μl DMEM were loaded in a 0.2 ml PCR thin-walled tube, which was placed vertically with its conical bottom aligned within beam focus of the HIFU transducer.
Measurement of temperature profile
The temperature profile at the HIFU focus was measured by using a Digital Thermometor (MC3000-000, Shanghai DAHUA-CHINO Instrument Co, Ltd, Shanghai, China) with 0.1 mm bare-wire thermocouple inserted into the tumor tissue or the cell suspension. The thermocouple embedded in the tumor or cell suspension was first aligned to the HIFU focus then temperature elevations and distributions around the center of focus during HIFU exposures were recorded.
Assay of DC infiltration inside tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry
One day after the HIFU treatment, tumors were surgically excised, freshly frozen in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA USA), and sectioned at 6 μm thickness. The cryostat sections were then fixed in acetone and immunostained with hamster anti-mouse CD11c mAb (clone HL3, PharMingen). Subsequently, the antibody was visualized using an anti-hamster Ig HRP detection kit (Pharmingen) following the manufacturer's protocol. Finally, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and evaluated by light microscopy.
Generation of bone marrow-derived DC 
Bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibiae of female C57BL/6 mice, filtered through a Falcon 100-μm nylon cell strainer (BD Labware), and depleted of red blood cells by five minute incubation in ACK lysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1.0 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, pH 7.4). Whole bone marrow cells were plated in six-well plates (BD Labware) in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FCS (GIBCO-BRL, USA), GM-CSF (10 ng/ml), and IL-4 (10 ng/ml) (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, USA), and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2. Three days later, the floating cells (mostly granulocytes) were removed, and the adherent cells were replenished with fresh medium containing GM-CSF and IL-4. Non-adherent and loosely adherent cells were harvested on day 6 as immature DC (typically contained >90% cells expressing CD11c and MHC class II on the surface, as determined by flow cytometry).
In vitro stimulation of DCs with HIFU-treated tumor cells and assay for their maturation status
5 × 105 immature DCs generated from mouse bone marrow cells were co-cultured with HIFU-treated B16 tumor cells at ratio of 1:1 in 1 ml of culture for 2 days at 37°C with 5% CO2. DC alone, DC stimulated with CpG-ODN1826 (5'-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3', Coley Pharmaceutical, Wellesley, MA), which is a known potent DC stimulator, and DC co-cultured with non-HIFU treated B16 tumor cells were used as control. After incubation, supernatants were harvested and assayed for secreted IL-12 and IL-10 by commercial ELISA kits (Biosource International, CA, USA). To analyze the expression levels of co-stimulatory molecules, DCs were collected into cold PBS plus 1% dialyzed bovine serum albumin, then washed and stained on ice for 30 min with a combination of the following monoclonal antibodies: FITC-Conjugated Anti-Mouse CD11c, PE-Conjugated Anti-Mouse CD86, and PE-CY5-Conjugated Anti-Mouse CD80 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, USA). Subsequently, the cells were washed again and analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson).
Tumor growth regression assay
Following HIFU treatment, Mice were thereafter monitored daily for tumor growth. Mean tumor area for each group was calculated as the product of bisecting tumor diameters obtained from caliper measurements. Measurements were terminated and mice were sacrificed when tumors reached 20 mm in their largest dimension, or when mice became visibly unwell, or when the tumor became ulcerated.
ELISPOT Assay 
Spleens were harvested from euthanized tumor-bearing mice 14 days after HIFU treatment. Splenocytes from mice bearing MC-38 tumors in each group were restimulated in vitro by culture with mitomycin-pretreated MC-38 (specific) or EL4 (irrelevant) tumor cells at 20:1 responder-to-stimulator ratios for 24 h. Splenocytes from mice bearing B16 tumors were stimulated with 1 μg/ml of relevant peptides mouse TRP2181-188 (VYDFFVWL, purchased from Dalton Chemical Laboratories Inc. Toronto, ON, Canada), or irrelevant control peptide (OVA257-264: SIINFEKL) for 24 h. Re-stimulated splenocytes (1 × 106 cells in 100 μl medium) were then plated in 96-well nitrocellulose filter plates pre-coated with anti-mouse interferon-γ antibody (Pharmingen, San Diego, CA). After incubation for 24 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, the plates were washed with PBS, and "spots," corresponding to cytokine-producing cells, were visualized by incubation with 100 μl per well of biotinylated antimouse IFN-γ Ab (Pharmingen) overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBS/0.5% Tween, 1.25 μg/ml avidin alkaline phosphatase (Sigma) was added to the well in 100 μl PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. The development of the assay was then performed with l00 μl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT tablets, Sigma) for 10 minutes. The reaction is stopped by the addition of water and the plates allowed drying before counting individual spots with a Zeiss automated ELISPOT reader. The results were expressed as the number of spot-forming cells per 106 input cells. Overall, three independent experiments were performed with six replicate wells included in each treatment.
Assay of DC infiltration inside tumor tissue by flow cytometry
One day after the HIFU treatment, tumors were surgically excised. Single cell suspensions were generated from resected tumors as previously described. Briefly, tumors were diced in Ca2+- and Mg2+-free HBSS after resection, and incubated with 1 mg/ml type IV collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich) for 90 min at room temperature and under constant stirring. EDTA (2 mM) was added to the mixture for 30 additional min before filtration of the cell suspension on 70-μm cell strainers (BD Biosciences). The cell suspension was finally washed twice in HBSS before analysis. For flow cytometry, the following fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies (all purchased from BD PharMingen) were used for staining: CD45-FITC, CD11c-PE, I-A-PE-CY5, CD80-PE-CY5, CD-80-PE-CY5. After adding the appropriate antibody, the cells were incubated at 4°C for 30 min in PBS plus 1% of dialyzed bovine serum albumin and washed twice by centrifugation using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer. Fluorescence was analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and the CellQuest software (Becton-Dickinson).
HIFU system could produce a typical thermal effect on experimental tumors
The infiltrated DCs were mostly recruited to the periphery of thermal lesions after hifu exposure
Tumor cells at the periphery of HIFU-Induced thermal lesion may possess a stronger immunostimulatory property for DCs maturation
Similar results were obtained with the other cell line MC-38 (data not shown). These results demonstrated that HIFU-treatment can change tumor cells from immunosuppressive to immunostimulatory for DCs maturation. More importantly, tumor cells exposed to '55°C-HIFU', which produced a temperature elevation similar to that at the periphery of thermal lesion, exhibited a markedly stronger immunostimulatory potency than those exposed to '80°C-HIFU', which produced a temperature elevation similar to that at the center of thermal lesion. These data therefore provide evidence that tumor cells at the periphery of thermal lesions can more effectively activate DCs to mature than those within the lesions.
We speculated that intracellular HSP molecules release or their membrane exposure induced by HIFU treatments may be the keynote mechanism responsible for the stimulatory activities of DC maturation provided by HIFU-treated tumor cells. We have done some pilot experiments to compare the effects of different HIFU treatments on the expression of HSPs in tumor cells. Our preliminary results suggested the HIFU treatments caused significant up-regulations of HSP70 and HSP90 expression in tumor cells, in which 55°C-HIFU was more effective than 80°C-HIFU (Data not shown). Further studies are underway to determine whether these up-regulated HSPs are released in the extracellular milieu or translocated to cell surface to investigate more deeply the mechanisms of DC activation by HIFU-treated tumor cells.
It is feasible to boost HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity through optimizing scan strategy
Sparse-scan HIFU was more effective than dense-scan HIFU in enhancing infiltration of DCs into tumor tissues and promoting their maturation in situ
In the present study, our results showed that a sparse-scan strategy in HIFU ablation of tumor produced separated thermal lesions with a proper intra-lesion space and elicited a stronger systemic anti-tumor immune response than currently used dense-scan HIFU strategy, which is associated with more effective promotion of DC maturation by tumor cells at the periphery of thermal lesions.
These preliminary findings have significant implications for improving HIFU treatment of cancer in clinic. The conventional treatment protocol in clinical HIFU therapy utilizes a dense-scan strategy to produce closely packed or overlapped thermal lesions aiming at eradicating as much tumor mass as possible. Although effective in reducing the primary tumor mass, this strategy is time consuming and is not most effective in terms of induction of systemic anti-tumor immunity, so that it can not provide efficient micro-metastatic control and long-term tumor resistance for cancer patients. Here we proposed that, by simply adjusting scan strategy to produce separated thermal lesions with a proper intra-lesion space, a stronger systemic anti-tumor immune response may be elicited while not impair its tumor ablation efficiency, so that the overall quality and effectiveness of HIFU cancer therapy can be improved and the treatment time can be significantly shorten. Future clinical studies will tell whether this promise comes true.
This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China No 30772072 and Shanghai Pujiang Program No 08PJ1400200.
- Hynynen K, Pomeroy O, Smith DN, Huber PE, McDannold NJ, Kettenbach J, Baum J, Singer S, Jolesz FA: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. Radiology. 2001, 219: 176-185.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaussy C, Thuroff S: The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection. Curr Urol Rep. 2003, 4: 248-252. 10.1007/s11934-003-0077-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy JE, Wu F, ter Haar GR, Gleeson FV, Phillips RR, Middleton MR, Cranston D: High-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of liver tumours. Ultrasonics. 2004, 42: 931-935. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.089.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen W, Wang Z, Wu F, Zhu H, Zou J, Bai J, Li K, Xie F: [High intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of primary malignant bone tumor]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2002, 24: 612-615.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Chen WZ, Liu YJ, Hu X, Zhou K, Chen L, Peng S, Zhu H, Zou HL, Bai J, Wang ZB: Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided high intensity focused ultrasound therapy for ablating uterine fibroids in patients with bowel lies anterior to uterus. Eur J Radiol. 2008Google Scholar
- Xiong LL, Hwang JH, Huang XB, Yao SS, He CJ, Ge XH, Ge HY, Wang XF: Early clinical experience using high intensity focused ultrasound for palliation of inoperable pancreatic cancer. Jop. 2009, 10: 123-129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thuroff S, Chaussy C, Vallancien G, Wieland W, Kiel HJ, Le Duc A, Desgrandchamps F, De La Rosette JJ, Gelet A: High-intensity focused ultrasound and localized prostate cancer: efficacy results from the European multicentric study. J Endourol. 2003, 17: 673-677. 10.1089/089277903322518699.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Wang W, Gui Y, Zhang M, Zheng G, Zhou Y, Xu G, Li M: Extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound ablation in the treatment of 1038 patients with solid carcinomas in China: an overview. Ultrason Sonochem. 2004, 11: 149-154. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.01.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Visioli AG, Rivens IH, ter Haar GR, Horwich A, Huddart RA, Moskovic E, Padhani A, Glees J: Preliminary results of a phase I dose escalation clinical trial using focused ultrasound in the treatment of localised tumours. Eur J Ultrasound. 1999, 9: 11-18. 10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00009-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Wang ZB, Chen WZ, Zou JZ, Bai J, Zhu H, Li KQ, Xie FL, Jin CB, Su HB, Gao GW: Extracorporeal focused ultrasound surgery for treatment of human solid carcinomas: early Chinese clinical experience. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004, 30: 245-260. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.10.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Leenders GJ, Beerlage HP, Ruijter ET, de la Rosette JJ, Kaa van de CA: Histopathological changes associated with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for localised adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Pathol. 2000, 53: 391-394. 10.1136/jcp.53.5.391.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu F, Wang ZB, Lu P, Xu ZL, Chen WZ, Zhu H, Jin CB: Activated anti-tumor immunity in cancer patients after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004, 30: 1217-1222. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.08.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou Q, Zhu XQ, Zhang J, Xu ZL, Lu P, Wu F: Changes in circulating immunosuppressive cytokine levels of cancer patients after high intensity focused ultrasound treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008, 34: 81-87. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.07.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Banchereau J, Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 1998, 392: 245-252. 10.1038/32588.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi A, Kono K, Ichihara F, Sugai H, Fujii H, Matsumoto Y: Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibits maturation of dendritic cells induced by lipopolysaccharide, but not by proinflammatory cytokines. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53: 543-550. 10.1007/s00262-003-0466-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Almand B, Clark JI, Nikitina E, van Beynen J, English NR, Knight SC, Carbone DP, Gabrilovich DI: Increased production of immature myeloid cells in cancer patients: a mechanism of immunosuppression in cancer. J Immunol. 2001, 166: 678-689.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Satthaporn S, Robins A, Vassanasiri W, El-Sheemy M, Jibril JA, Clark D, Valerio D, Eremin O: Dendritic cells are dysfunctional in patients with operable breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53: 510-518. 10.1007/s00262-003-0485-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tesniere A, Panaretakis T, Kepp O, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G: Molecular characteristics of immunogenic cancer cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2008, 15: 3-12. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402269.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu Z, Yang XY, Liu Y, Morse MA, Lyerly HK, Clay TM, Zhong P: Release of endogenous danger signals from HIFU-treated tumor cells and their stimulatory effects on APCs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 335: 124-131. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.071.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu Z, Yang XY, Liu Y, Sankin GN, Pua EC, Morse MA, Lyerly HK, Clay TM, Zhong P: Investigation of HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity in a murine tumor model. J Transl Med. 2007, 5: 34-10.1186/1479-5876-5-34.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Preynat-Seauve O, Schuler P, Contassot E, Beermann F, Huard B, French LE: Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells are potent antigen-presenting cells able to activate T cells and mediate tumor rejection. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 61-67.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hill CR, Rivens I, Vaughan MG, ter Haar GR: Lesion development in focused ultrasound surgery: a general model. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994, 20: 259-269. 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90066-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kramer G, Steiner GE, Grobl M, Hrachowitz K, Reithmayr F, Paucz L, Newman M, Madersbacher S, Gruber D, Susani M, Marberger M: Response to sublethal heat treatment of prostatic tumor cells and of prostatic tumor infiltrating T-cells. Prostate. 2004, 58: 109-120. 10.1002/pros.10314.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsan MF, Gao B: Heat shock proteins and immune system. J Leukoc Biol. 2009, 85: 905-910. 10.1189/jlb.0109005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Trinchieri G: Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003, 3: 133-146. 10.1038/nri1001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vicari AP, Trinchieri G: Interleukin-10 in viral diseases and cancer: exiting the labyrinth. Immunol Rev. 2004, 202: 223-236. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00216.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabrilovich DI, Ciernik IF, Carbone DP: Dendritic cells in antitumor immune responses. I. Defective antigen presentation in tumor-bearing hosts. Cell Immunol. 1996, 170: 101-110. 10.1006/cimm.1996.0139.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.