Skip to content

Advertisement

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact us so we can address the problem.

Detection of activated KRAS from cancer patient peripheral blood using a weighted enzymatic chip array

Journal of Translational Medicine201412:147

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-12-147

©  Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

  • Received: 21 February 2014
  • Accepted: 22 May 2014
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The KRAS oncogene was one of the earliest discoveries of genetic alterations in colorectal and lung cancers. Moreover, KRAS somatic mutations might be used for predicting the efficiency of anti-EGFR therapeutic drugs. The purpose of this research was to improve Activating KRAS Detection Chip by using a weighted enzymatic chip array (WEnCA) platform to detect activated KRAS mutations status in the peripheral blood of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in Taiwan.

Methods

Our laboratory developed an Activating KRAS Detection Chip and a WEnCA technique that can detect activated KRAS mutation status by screening circulating cancer cells in the surrounding bloodstream. We collected 390 peripheral blood samples of NSCLC patients (n = 210) and CRC patients (n = 180) to evaluate clinical KRAS activation using this gene array diagnosis apparatus, an Activating KRAS Detection Chip and a WEnCA technique. Subsequently, we prospectively enrolled 88 stage III CRC patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy with or without cetuximab. We compared the chip results of preoperative blood specimens and their relationship with disease control status in these patients.

Results

After statistical analysis, the sensitivity of WEnCA was found to be 93%, and the specificity was found to be 94%. Relapse status and chip results among the stage III CRC patients receiving FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab (n = 59) and those receiving FOLFOX-4 alone (n = 29) were compared. Among the 51 stage III CRC patients with chip negative results who were treated with FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab chemotherapy, the relapse rate was 33.3%; otherwise, the relapse rate was 48.5% among the 23 out of 88 patients with chip negative results who received FOLFOX-4 alone. Negative chip results were significantly associated to better treatment outcomes in the FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab group (P = 0.047).

Conclusions

The results demonstrated that the WEnCA technique is a sensitive and convenient technique that produces easy-to-interpret results for detecting activated KRAS from the peripheral blood of cancer patients. We suggest that the WEnCA technique is also a potential tool for predicting responses in CRC patients following FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab chemotherapy.

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Lung cancer
  • Peripheral blood
  • Weighted enzymatic chip array (WEnCA)
  • Activating KRAS Detection Chip

Background

Ras proteins, which play a key role in cell growth, apoptosis, motility, and differentiation, are low molecular weight (21 kD) GTPases that cycle between the GDP-bound (inactive) and the GTP-bound (active) states at the plasma membrane[1, 2] and bind to and activate a plethora of downstream effector proteins, including Raf kinases, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3-K), and RalGDS family members[3–5]. The activation of mutations of the ras family is among the most common genetic events of human tumorigenesis[6]. Constitutive activations of the three canonical family members—K-ras, N-ras, and H-ras are segregated strongly by tissue type[7]. Of these, KRAS mutations are the most common in human tumors, including those arising from the colon and lungs[8]. In our previous research analysis of the KRAS mutation of lung cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), and adrenocortical cancer, the mutation rates of these cancer tissues were found to be 37%, 26%, and 45%, respectively[9–14]. The frequency of KRAS mutations across a broad range of human tumors suggests the potency of the oncogenic contribution of the constitutively active form of this protein.

In recent years, due to rapid developments in targeted therapies, numerous monoclonal antibodies and molecular drugs that have been developed and applied clinically, such as Iressa and Cetuximab. Many reports show that KRAS mutations are highly specific negative predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and similarity to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies alone or in combination with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)[15–18]. Therefore, the efficient, accurate, and fast analysis for detecting KRAS mutations status in cancer patients before selecting such type of targeted therapy is considered quite important.

So far, therapeutic targets such as HER2/neu, EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF are analyzed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combining direct sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), real-time PCR, and other methods. These methods have disadvantages, such as inadequate sensitivity and the need to collect patients’ cancer tissues as a specimen, which make medicinal-effect evaluations prior to clinical treatment difficult. When the tumor size is too small, when the tumor has been removed by resection, or when the tumor has metastasized, no tumor tissues can be obtained for such analyses. In previous studies, we successfully constructed the Activating KRAS Detection Chip for detecting KRAS activation from peripheral blood, and demonstrated that there was a high level of correlation between activating KRAS and KRAS mutations[10, 19]. Since the target genes on the chip were originally selected from a microarray which had been used to distinguish between adrenocortical tumor tissues with mutant KRAS and normal controls[19], and since the detection accuracy was validated as 93.85% in that study, the chip is reasonably referred to as KRAS detection chip. On the other hand, a correlation between KRAS mutations and poor responses to EGFR targeted treatment was also found[20, 21]. For this reason, the detection of activating KRAS could be used to predict the response to EGFR targeted treatment.

Although this technique provides a convenient way of using peripheral blood directly for detecting KRAS activation and has achieved major breakthroughs in clinical applications, its sensitivity is only approximately 84%[19]. The aim of this research is to improve this technique by using a weighted enzymatic chip array (WEnCA) platform (Figure 1), in which the weighted scores are added according to the relevance of each gene to activating KRAS mutations. The 22 candidate genes on the Activating KRAS Detection Chip are given different weighted values, based on the performance after KRAS activation, in order to develop a detection platform that is more sensitive, accurate, and easier to read than the former technique that did not include weighted calculation which was also established by our research team[22]. The weighted calculations of genes on the Activating KRAS Detection Chip simplify the interpretation of results, due to the widened gap between the positive and negative results. In the current study, we collected 390 peripheral blood samples from NSCLC and CRC patients to evaluate their clinical KRAS activation using the WEnCA technique to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WEnCA. In advance, we analyzed the correlations among relapse status, chemotherapy (oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) chemotherapy) plus cetuximab status and chip results for 88 patients with Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III CRC. The results provided evidence that using the Activating KRAS Detection Chip in clinical contexts has the potential to increase the accuracy of chemotherapy efficacy predictions for stage III CRC patients receiving chemotherapy plus cetuximab treatment.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The operating procedure of weighted enzymatic chip array (WEnCA). The operating procedure of weighted enzymatic chip array (WEnCA) includes RNA purification by magnetic beads, cDNA labeling with Biotin, enzymatic chromogenic reaction, and weighted calculation for result interpretation of the chip.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples collection

Initially, cancerous tissues from 390 randomly selected cancer patients, including 210 NSCLC patients and 180 CRC patients, were enrolled into this study. The data of these 390 cancer patients were used to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of WEnCA. Furthermore, we enrolled 88 stage III CRC patients to investigate the clinical application of chip results and their correlations with CRC relapse status in patients receiving FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab or FOLFOX-4 alone.

Cancerous tissues and corresponding preoperative peripheral blood samples (5 ml) from 210 randomized NSCLC patients and 180 randomized CRC patients undergoing radical resection were investigated using WEnCA. All of these patients had undergone surgical resection, with NSCLC and CRC pathologies diagnosed in two hospitals, including Fooyin University Hospital and Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. To avoid the contamination of skin cells, blood samples were taken through an intravenous catheter before surgery, and the first few milliliters of blood were discarded. Total RNA was immediately extracted from the peripheral whole blood and then served as templates for complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis. Tissue specimens were collected immediately after surgical resection, frozen instantly in liquid nitrogen, and stored in a freezer at -80°C until analysis. Sample acquisition and use were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the two hospitals.

Moreover, we included 88 stage III CRC patients who were treated postoperatively with adjuvant FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab or with FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy only. The FOLFOX-4 plus cetuximab regimen consisted of biweekly cetuximab at a dose of 500 mg/m2 in a two-hour infusion, followed by FOLFOX-4 chemotherapy on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. The FOLFOX-4 treatment consisted of 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin concurrent with 200 mg/m2 of leucovorin, both as a two-hour infusion on day 1, followed by a 400 mg/m2 bolus of 5-FU and a continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2 of 5-FU over 22 -hours, was repeated every 2 weeks for 12 cycles in total. Postoperative surveillance consisted of a medical history, physical examination, and laboratory studies every 3 months. Abdominal ultrasonography or CT was performed every 3 months during chemotherapy. After the chemotherapy was completed, abdominal ultrasonography or CT was performed every 6 months. Chest radiography and a total colonoscopy were performed once a year. The enrolled patients were followed up at 3-month intervals for 2 years and at 6-month intervals thereafter. Relapse was defined as any local recurrence or distant metastases within 36 months after the adjuvant chemotherapy. Then, we compared those blood specimen chip results with the relapse status for these patients.

DNA extraction and direct sequencing

Genomic DNA was isolated from the surgically resected primary tumor tissues using a proteinase-K (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction procedure, according to the method of Sambrook[23]. To identify mutations of the KRAS genes in cancerous tissues, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed. The oligonucleotide primers for KRAS exons 1 and 2 were used (Table 1). Briefly, the PCR amplification of DNA samples (20 ng) was performed in a 50 ul reaction volume with a final concentration of 19 PCR buffer [10 mmol/l Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mmol/l MgCl2, 50 mmol/l KCl, and 0.01% gelatin], 100 mmol/l deoxynucleotide triphosphate (Promega), and 5 U (1 U/ul) BioTools DNA polymerase (Biotechnological and Medical Laboratories, S.A., Madrid, Spain) for each reaction. The PCR products were purified by a QIAEX II gel extraction kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and then subjected to sequencing using a double-stranded cycle sequencing system (Gibco-BRL, MD, USA). The purified products were then sequenced directly with a T7 promoter/IRD800 (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA), which is a T7 promoter primer (Table 1) labelled with a heptamethine cyanine dye, using DNA polymerase incorporating infrared fluorochrome (IRD)-labelled dATP for sequencing reaction. To detect and analyse the sequencing ladder, an automated DNA electrophoresis system (Model 4200; LICOR) with a laser diode emitting at 785 nm and fluorescence detection between 815 and 835 nm was used. Following the loading of samples, electrophoresis was executed at a constant voltage of 2,000 V with the gel heated to 50°C. Data collection and image analysis were performed using an IBM486 (Model 90) with the Base Image IR software supplied with the model 4200 DNA sequencer.
Table 1

Nucleotide sequences of oligonucleotide primers used for PCR and sequencing of KRAS

  

Sequences

PCR product (bp)

Gene

Exon

Forward primer (5′ → 3′)

Reverse primer (5′ → 3′)

 

KRAS

1

TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGAGATATGTTGAGGGCCCATCTCTC

TCCTAGGTCAGCGCAACCAAAT

131

KRAS

2

TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTTCCTACAGGAAGCAAGTAG

CACAAAGAAAGCCCTCCCCA

148

Sequencing primer

CCCTATAGTGAGTCGTATTA

  

Total RNA extraction and first strand cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from the fresh whole blood of cancer patients using the GeneCling® Enzymatic Gene Chip Detection Kit (MedicoGene Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Los Angeles, CA, USA). Purified RNA was quantified by OD 260 nm using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) and quantitated by Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, USA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using a GeneCling® Enzymatic Gene Chip Detection Kit. Reverse transcription was performed in a reaction mixture consisting of a 3 μg/ml oligo (dT) 18-mer primer, 1 μg/ml random 6-mer primer, 100 mmol/l deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate, 200 units of Reverse Transcriptase MMLV, and 25 units of ribonuclease inhibitor. The reaction mixtures with RNA were incubated at 42°C for a minimum of 2 h, heated to 95°C for 5 min, and then stored at -80°C until analysis.

Preparation of activating KRAS detection chip

The procedure of the membrane-array method for gene detection was performed based on our previous study[19]. Visual OMP3 (Oligonucleotide Modeling Platform, DNA Software, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to design probes for target genes and β-actin. The oligonucleotide sequences of 22 target genes for Activating KRAS Detection Chip are listed in Table 2. The newly synthesized oligonucleotide fragments were dissolved in distilled water to a concentration of 100 mM, and applied to a BioJet Plus 3000 nL dispensing system (BioDot Inc., Irvine, CA, USA), which blotted the target oligonucleotide; the β-actin control was used sequentially (0.05 μL per spot and 1.5 mm between spots) on a SuPerCharge nylon membrane (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) in triplicate. After rapid drying and cross-linking procedures, the preparation of the membrane array was completed. The expression levels of each gene spot measured by the WEnCA method were quantified and then normalized based on reference gene (β-actin) density. We have defined as an overexpressed gene spot as a case wherein the observed normalized spot density was 2 or more.
Table 2

Oligonucleotide sequences of target genes

Gene

Oligonucleotide sequences (5′ → 3′)

ATP2A2

ACCCGGACTTTGAAGGCTTGGATTGTGCAATCTTTGAATCCCCATACCCG

ATP6V0B

CATCGGCCATCGGAACTACCATGCAGGCTACTCCATGTTTGGGGCT

BCL2

ACAACATCGCCCTGTGGATGACTGAGTACCTGAACCGGCACCTGCACA

CALM2

GAAGCATTCCGTGTGTTTGATAAGGATGGCAATGGCTATATTAGTGCTGCAGAACTTCG

CEBPB

CCGCCTGCCTTTAAATCCATGGAAGTGGCCAACTTCTACTACGAGGCGGA

CLSTN1

TCTCTCCTCTCTCCTCCCCAGAGCACCCCCTGCCATCAGGGGGGTTGAAA

COL4A1

GCAAATGTGACTGCCATGGAGTGAAGGGACAAAAGGGTGAAAGAGGCCTC

CXCL11

GTTCAAGGCTTCCCCATGTTCAAAAGAGGACGCTGTCTTTGCATAGGCCC

CXCR4

CCCCATCCTCTATGCTTTCCTTGGAGCCAAATTTAAAACCTCTGCCCAGCAC

CYR61

CAGCAGCCTGAAAAAGGGCAAGAAATGCAGCAAGACCAAGAAATCCCCCG

DVL3

CGTCACCTTGGCGGACTTTAAGGGCGTTTTTGCAGCGACCCAGCTATAAGT

E2F4

TGAGATCACAGTGAGTGGCGGCCCTGGGACTGATAGCAAGGACAGT

ETS1

TGGAGCAGCCAGTCATCTTTCAACAGCCTGCAGCGTGTTCCCTCCTATGA

H2AFZ

CGTGGAGATGAAGAATTGGATTCTCTCATCAAGGCTACAATTGCTGGTGGTGGTGTC

L1CAM

CCTTCCTGGTGGTGTCCAACACGTCCACCTTCGTGCCCTATGAGATCAAA

LRP1

ATGCCTGTGAAAACGACCAGTATGGGAAGCCGGGTGGCTGCTCTGACAT

RAP1B

GGAAGATGAAAGAGTTGTAGGGAAGGAACAAGGTCAAAATCTAGCAAGACAATGGAACAACTGTG

RPL30

GCTCCAACTCGTTATGAAAAGTGGGAAGTACGTCCTGGGGTACAAGCAGAC

SLC25A5

TCTGATGGGATTAAGGGCCTGTACCAAGGCTTTAACGTGTCTGTGCAGGG

SPP1

GTGGACAGCCAGGACTCCATTGACTCGAACGACTCTGATGATGTAGATGAC

TAF12

CAGCACCCCTCCACAAGGCTCCATGGCCAATAGTACTGCAGTGGTAAAGA

TBX19

TCATCTGCTCAATGTGGTGGAGAGTGAGCTTCAGGCAGGGAGGGAAAAAG

β-actin

TGCATTGTTACAGGAAGTCCCTTGCCATCCTAAAAGCCACCCCACTTCTCTCTAAGGAGA

Preparation of Biotin-labeled cDNA targets and hybridization

First-strand cDNA were applied for biotin labeling, and the biotin labeled probes then hybridized with the Activating KRAS Detection Chip. The hybridized chip followed washing, blocking and color development procedures using a GeneCling® Enzymatic Gene Chip Detection Kit. The hybridized arrays were then scanned with an Epson Perfection 1670 flatbed scanner (SEIKO EPSON Corp., Nagano-ken, Japan). Subsequent quantification analysis of the intensity of each spot was executed using AlphaEase® FC software (Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA, USA). Spots consistently carrying a factor of two or more were considered to be differentially expressed. A deformable template extracted the gene spots and quantified their expression levels by determining the integrated intensity of each spot after background subtraction. The fold ratio for each gene was calculated as follows: spot intensity ratio = mean intensity of target gene / mean intensity of β-actin. Figure 2 provides the schematic representation of the membrane array with 22 candidate genes, one positive control (β-actin), one negative control (Oryza sativa sequence), and the blank control (dd water). As the concentration of β- actin was diluted 10–20 fold diluted for spotting, it would only present the medial-low expression level. According to the procedure, the chromogenic reaction was stopped depending on the appearance of the strongest spots; thus, the expression of β- actin on each chip would not be the same even under a longer chromogenic development procedure. Since β- actin acted as the internal control on each chip, all the other spots were then normalized based on the density of β-actin to reduce the individual differences.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The schematic representation of an Activating KRAS Detection Chip and the analytic results in the peripheral blood specimen. (A) The schematic representation of an Activating KRAS Detection Chip with 22 candidate genes, one positive control (β-actin), one negative control (Oryza sativa sequence), and the blank control (dd water). Oligonucleotide fragments are blotted on membranes in triplicate. The expression levels of each gene spot were quantified and then normalized based on reference gene (β-actin) density which the spots are within the red circle of each image. We defined an overexpressed gene spot when the normalized spot density was 2 or more. Each overexpressed spot was then multiplied by respective weighted values ranging from 1 to 4 based on the performance after KRAS activation to calculate the total score of the chip. When the total score was higher than cutoff value 20, the chip result were considered to be positive. (B) Detectable KRAS oncogene from circulating RNA in the peripheral blood. (C) Undetectable KRAS oncogene from circulating RNA in the peripheral blood.

Chip interpretation (WEnCA method)

A deformable template extracted the gene spots and quantified their expression levels by determining the integrated intensity of each spot after background subtraction. The fold ratio of each gene was normalized based on reference gene (β-actin) density as follows: spot intensity ratio = mean intensity of target gene/mean intensity of β-actin. Normalized spot density carrying a factor of 2 or more was considered to be a differentially overexpressed gene. Each overexpressed spot was then multiplied by respective weighted values ranging from 1 to 4 based on the performance after KRAS activation to calculate the total score of the chip. When the total score was higher than cutoff value 20 which was determined through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve in our previous study, the chip was defined as positive result[22].

Statistical and database analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A chi-square test was used to analyze the association between WEnCA and direct sequencing for activated KRAS detection in peripheral blood and tumor tissues. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the WEnCA platform were evaluated. The chip results and the clinical pathological features of NSCLC and CRC patients, and the relapse status and cetuximab medication status between the two groups (positive chip result versus negative chip result) were compared using chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological features of cancer patients

We used data from a sample consisting of 206 men (52.8%) and 184 women (47.2%). The mean age was 64 years (range 37–87 years) for the 210 NSCLC patients and 65 years (range 29–79 years) for the 180 CRC patients. The clinicopathologic characteristics of these cancer patients are listed in Table 3; 202 patients were subsequently diagnosed with stage I-II cancers, and 188 were subsequently diagnosed with stage III-IV cancers.
Table 3

Clinicopathologic characteristics of 210 non-small-cell lung cancer patients and 180 colorectal cancer patients

 

Lung cancer

Colorectal cancer

Variables

number (%)

number (%)

Gender

  

    Male

112 (53.3)

94 (52.2)

     Female

98 (46.7)

86 (47.8)

Age (years)

  

     <65

115 (54.8)

85 (47.2)

     ≥65

95 (45.2)

95 (52.8)

Stage (AICC)a

  

      I + II

109 (51.9)

93 (51.7)

     III + IV

101 (48.1)

87 (48.3)

T stage

  

     T1 + T2

149 (70.9)

44 (24.4)

     T3 + T4

61 (29.1)

136 (75.6)

Lymph node metastasis

  

       No

94 (44.8)

93 (51.7)

      Yes

116 (55.2)

87 (48.3)

aAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer.

The association between WEnCA and direct sequencing for activated KRAS detection in peripheral blood and tumor tissues

To establish the capabilities of the WEnCA platform for the clinical detection of KRAS activation in blood samples, we collected 390 samples of peripheral blood from pathology-proven NSCLC and CRC patients. All specimens were tested with the Activating KRAS Detection Chip using the WEnCA method (Table 4). The paired cancer tissue of 390 samples then served to detect KRAS mutational status by direct sequencing. There were 127 cancer tissues with KRAS mutants. The mutation sites are distributed in codon 12, 13, 15, 18, 31, and 60. Among them, 117 were positive through WEnCA. Moreover, among the 263 paired cancer tissues with wild type KRAS, 249 were negative through WEnCA. After statistical analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of WEnCA were 92.13%, 94.68%, 89.31%, 96.14% and 93.85%, respectively (p <0.001).
Table 4

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of weighted enzymatic chip array for KRAS mutation detection

 

Direct sequencinga

       
 

Mutation (N = 127)

Wild type (N = 263 )

Total

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPVc

NPVd

Accuracy

P-value

 

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

(95% CI)

 

WEnCAb

         

Positive

117

14

131

92.13%

94.68%

89.31%

96.14%

93.85%

<0.001

Negative

10

249

259

(86.11-95.67%)

(91.26-96.8%)

(82.86-93.53%)

(93.04-97.89%)

(91.47-96.23%)

 

a KRAS in tumor tissues (direct sequencing).

b KRAS in peripheral blood (weighted enzymatic chip array; WEnCA).

cPPV: positive predictive value.

dNPV: negative predictive value.

95% CI: 95% confidence interval.

The association between the calculation results of WEnCA and the clinicopathological features

The mean positive gene number and the mean total score of the positive chip by WEnCA associated significantly with the AJCC stage, T stage, and distant metastasis (p <0.05) (Table 5).
Table 5

The association between the mean positive gene number and the mean positive total score by WEnCA and the clinicopathological features of cancer patients

  

WEnCA

 
  

Positive number

Mean positive total score

P value

Variables

Total

117

46.86

 

Stage (AJCC)a

    

I + II

202

41

41.62

< 0.0001

III + IV

188

76

48.73

 

T stage

    

T1 + T2

193

75

43.93

< 0.0001

T3 + T4

197

42

50.37

 

Lymph node metastasis

    

No

187

50

47.67

0.177

Yes

203

67

46.64

 

Distant metastasis

    

No

297

79

41.21

0.009

Yes

93

38

54.72

 

a American Joint Committee on Cancer.

The association between clinical relapse status and WEnCA results in stage III CRC patients treated with or without cetuximab

A significant association was found between the chip results, cetuximab treatment and clinical outcome that 51 patients with negative chip results received cetuximab treatment, and 34 (66.7%) of those patients had no relapse (p = 0.047). On the other hand, 6 (75%) of the 8 patients with positive chip results who chose to receive cetuximab treatment, most had a relapse (6 patients, 75%) (Table 6). Otherwise, no significant relationship was found in patients who were treated with FOLFOX-4 alone (p = 0.633). Half of 6 patients with positive chip results who received FOLFOX-4 alone had a relapse. Similarly, 16 (48.5%) patients with positive chip results received FOLFOX-4 alone, and half of them had a relapse (Table 6).
Table 6

The association between chemotherapy regimen, relapse status, and WEnCA result in 88 stage III CRC patients

Chemotherapy regimen (N)

WEnCA (N)

Relapse

No relapse

P-value

 

N = 42 (%)

N = 46 (%)

 

FOLFOX-4 plus Cetuximab (N = 59)

Positive (N = 8)

6 (75)

2 (25)

0.047

 

Negative (N = 51)

17 (33.3)

34 (66.7)

 

FOLFOX-4 (N = 29)

Positive (N = 6)

3 (50)

3 (50)

0.633

 

Negative (N = 23)

16 (48.5)

7 (21.2)

 

Discussion

Previous studies[24, 25] showed that the benefits of the anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are limited to those patients who have colorectal tumor tissues with wild-type KRAS genes, and KRAS genes with mutations are essentially insensitive to EGFR inhibitors. In particular, KRAS genotyping of primary tumor tissues or metastatic lesions is strongly recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology version 3 (2008) in patients with mCRC prior to any therapy that includes anti-EGFR mAbs[26]. Therefore, it is important to identify mCRC patients who harbor KRAS mutants prior to the addition of such expensive targeted therapies to standard chemotherapy.

KRAS genotyping highlights the value of banking tumor specimens obtained from primary tumors or a metastasis. In most of these studies, KRAS genotyping was performed on primary colorectal cancers, whereas anti-EGFR antibodies were used to treat the metastatic disease. This strategy might, at least in certain circumstances, present two limitations[27]. First, systematic KRAS genotyping in metastatic colorectal cancer patients might be hampered in the future, at least for some patients, by the difficulty of obtaining tumor samples suitable for molecular analyses. Second, considering the genetic heterogeneity of colorectal cancers[28, 29], the absence of detectable KRAS mutations in the primary tumor may not formally exclude the presence of a KRAS mutation in metastases, and consequently, additional tumor samples need to be examined in order for KRAS mutations to correctly predict the KRAS status in metastatic lesions. Hence, an alternative method for detecting KRAS gene mutations in these metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with anti-EGFR is needed. We used this chip to detect the activating KRAS, not to directly identify its mutation status. There are many mutation sites on the KRAS gene, including codons 12, 13, 15, 18, and 31, among others, but while some mutations activate KRAS, others do not. In our earlier reports[10, 19], we found that blood samples with KRAS mutations in codon 31 always showed negative results in this chip assay. The possible reason for this finding is that the mutation site of these codons cannot activate KRAS, which may explain the discordance in KRAS status between tumor and blood samples.

A previous study reported that KRAS mutations in a tumor may not be detected in the bloodstream and suggested that this non-detection may be caused by the low DNA concentration, as well as the heterogeneity[30]. Since the principle of the Activating KRAS Detection Chip is to detect the expression of multiple downstream genes from KRAS, it could reveal the integral situation of activating KRAS instead of detecting the status from a single marker, which may be undetectable because of detection limitations, and in this way also overcome the heterogeneity issue.

Our recently developed membrane-array-based multi-marker assay can detect activating KRAS mutations in the circulating RNA in the peripheral blood of patients with various malignancies, including colorectal cancer, achieving considerable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when compared to the direct sequencing of tumor tissues[19]. The results of the current study demonstrate that WEnCA is a sensitive and convenient technique for detecting activated KRAS from the peripheral blood of NSCLC and CRC cancer patients. In fact, the sensitivity of WEnCA reached 92.13% and the specificity reached 94.68% in this study, and the similar results which the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were all above 92% in previous studies using WEnCA platform[31, 32].

Although the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is a rapidly developed high-throughput technique that improves the sensitivity and reduces the cost of Sanger sequencing, the difficulty in tumor tissue specimen collection still cause the limitation for this method[33]. Even NGS can be applied to RNA sequencing using blood sample[34], the data analysis and interpretation is quiet complicated especially compared with WEnCA platform which is easy to interpret and only needs basic calculation. Moreover, the overall cost of NGS is higher than membrane-based WEnCA platform currently.

The identification of activated KRAS status could be extremely useful in selecting feasible CRC patients for cetuximab therapy, allowing some patients to avoid unnecessary treatment. In the present study, the relapse rate was only 17/51 (33.3%) in stage III CRC patients with negative chip results who received cetuximab therapy; on the other hand, the rate was 75% among patients with positive chip results. There were prominent associations between the chip results and relapse status, and these associations could therefore be used as a pre-cetuximab therapy predictor for clinical outcomes of stage III CRC. This finding could be useful in the future for identifying individual risk and developing alternative therapeutic strategies.

Conclusions

This present study indicated that a panel of molecular markers could be applied, in conjunction with our constructed membrane-array method with weighted calculation, to detect activating KRAS status from circulating RNA in the peripheral blood of NSCLC and CRC patients. The Activating KRAS Detection Chip using WEnCA technique could also be a potential aid in clinical predictions for obtaining better cetuximab response prediction models. The results of the present study suggest that such technique could be used to distinguish between CRC patients who will respond to cetuximab treatment and those who will not. That being said, further studies involving larger sample sizes and even multiple centers are needed to verify these results.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Science Council of the Republic of China (NSC 99-2320-B-242-002-MY3), the Excellence for Cancer Research Center Grant through funding by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, Republic of China (MOHW103-TD-B-111-05), the Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUH101-1 M66, KMUH102-2 M46), and the Grant of Biosignature in Colorectal Cancers, Academia Sinica, Taiwan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(3)
Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(4)
Personalized Medical Service Center, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, 928, Taiwan
(5)
Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-San University, Kaohsiung, 804, Taiwan
(6)
Division of Medical Research, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, 928, Taiwan
(7)
Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(8)
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(9)
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, 807, Taiwan
(10)
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fooyin University Hospital, Pingtung, 928, Taiwan

References

  1. McCormick F: ras GTPase activating protein: signal transmitter and signal terminator. Cell. 1989, 56: 5-8. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90976-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shao J, Sheng H, DuBois RN, Beauchamp RD: Oncogenic Ras-mediated cell growth arrest and apoptosis are associated with increased ubiquitin-dependent cyclin D1 degradation. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 22916-22924. 10.1074/jbc.M002235200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kikuchi A, Williams LT: Regulation of interaction of ras p21 with RalGDS and Raf-1 by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271 (1): 588-594. 10.1074/jbc.271.1.588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gohlke H, Kiel C, Case DA: Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes. J Mol Biol. 2003, 330: 891-913. 10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00610-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Du W, Liu A, Prendergast GC: Activation of the PI3'K-AKT pathway masks the proapoptotic effects of farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 4208-4212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE: Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002, 418: 934-10.1038/418934a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bos JL: The ras gene family and human carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 1988, 195: 255-271. 10.1016/0165-1110(88)90004-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bos JL: ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 4682-4689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang JY, Hsieh JS, Chang MY, Huang TJ, Chen FM, Cheng TL, Alexandersen K, Huang YS, Tzou WS, Lin SR: Molecular detection of APC, K- ras, and p53 mutations in the serum of colorectal cancer patients as circulating biomarkers. World J Surg. 2004, 28: 721-726.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chong IW, Chang MY, Sheu CC, Wang CY, Hwang JJ, Huang MS, Lin SR: Detection of activated K-ras in non-small cell lung cancer by membrane array: a comparison with direct sequencing. Oncol Rep. 2007, 18: 17-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsieh JS, Lin SR, Chang MY, Chen FM, Lu CY, Huang TJ, Huang YS, Huang CJ, Wang JY: APC, K-ras, and p53 gene mutations in colorectal cancer patients: correlation to clinicopathologic features and postoperative surveillance. Am Surgeon. 2005, 71: 336-343.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang JY, Hsieh JS, Lu CY, Yu FJ, Wu JY, Chen FM, Huang CJ, Lin SR: The differentially mutational spectra of the APC, K-ras, and p53 genes in sporadic colorectal cancers from Taiwanese patients. Hepato-gastroenterol. 2007, 54: 2259-2265.Google Scholar
  13. Wang JY, Lian ST, Chen YF, Yang YC, Chen LT, Lee KT, Huang TJ, Lin SR: Unique K-ras mutational pattern in pancreatic adenocarcinoma from Taiwanese patients. Cancer Lett. 2002, 180: 153-158. 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00818-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin SR, Tsai JH, Yang YC, Lee SC: Mutations of K-ras oncogene in human adrenal tumours in Taiwan. Brit J Cancer. 1998, 77: 1060-1065. 10.1038/bjc.1998.177.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Kanaloupiti D, Siannis F, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Papadimitriou CA, Murray S: Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 962-972. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70206-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Perez-Soler R: Erlotinib: recent clinical results and ongoing studies in non small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: s4589-s4592. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sequist LV, Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haber DA: Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 587-595. 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sun S, Schiller JH, Spinola M, Minna JD: New molecularly targeted therapies for lung cancer. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 2740-2750. 10.1172/JCI31809.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen YF, Wang JY, Wu CH, Chen FM, Cheng TL, Lin SR: Detection of circulating cancer cells with K-ras oncogene using membrane array. Cancer Lett. 2005, 229: 115-122. 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.12.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Lander C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR: K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. New Engl J Med. 2008, 359: 1757-1765. 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yen LC, Yeh YS, Chen CW, Wang HM, Tsai HL, Lu CY, Chang YT, Chu KS, Lin SR, Wang JY: Detection of KRAS oncogene in peripheral blood as a predictor of the response to cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 4508-4513. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-3179.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang MJ, Chiu HH, Wang HM, Yen LC, Tsao DA, Hsiao CP, Chen YF, Wang JY, Lin SR: Enhancing detection of circulating tumor cells with activating KRAS oncogene in patients with colorectal cancer by weighted chemiluminescent membrane array method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010, 17: 624-633. 10.1245/s10434-009-0831-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, Volume 6. 1989, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 22-26. 34Google Scholar
  24. De Roock W, Piessevaux H, De Schutter J, Janssens M, De Hertogh G, Personeni N, Biesmans B, Van Laethem JL, Peeters M, Humblet Y, Van Cutsem E, Tejpar S: KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. Ann Oncol. 2008, 19: 508-515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, Buc E, Ychou M, Bouche O, Landi B, Louvet C, Andre T, Bibeau F, Diebold MD, Rougier P, Ducreux M, Tomasic G, Emile JF, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P: KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26: 374-379. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology version 3 (2008). 2008,http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp,
  27. Di Fiore F, Charbonnier F, Lefebure B, Laurent M, Le Pessot F, Michel P, Frebourg T: Clinical interest of KRAS mutation detection in blood for anti-EGFR therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Brit J Cancer. 2008, 99: 551-552. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Baldus SE, Schaefer KL, Engers R, Hartleb D, Stoecklein NH, Gabbert HE: Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 790-799. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2446.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Watanabe T, Kobunai T, Yamamoto Y, Matsuda K, Ishihara S, Nozawa K, Iinuma H, Shibuya H, Eshima K: Heterogeneity of KRAS status may explain the subset of discordant KRAS status between primary and metastatic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011, 54: 1170-1178. 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31821d37a3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutierrez C, Rodriguez J, Patino-Garcia A, Garcia-Foncillas J, Salgado J: mutational status analysis of peripheral blood isolated circulating tumor cells in metastatic colorectal patients. Oncol Lett. 2013, 6: 1343-1345.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hsiung SK, Chang HJ, Yang MJ, Chang MS, Tsao DA, Chiu HH, Chen YF, Cheng TL, Lin SR: A novel technique for detecting the therapeutic target, KRAS mutant, from peripheral blood using the automatic chipball device with weighted enzymatic chip array. Fooyin J Health Sci. 2009, 1: 72-80. 10.1016/S1877-8607(10)60003-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Hsiung SK, Lin SR, Chang HJ, Chen YF, Huang MY: Clinical application of automatic gene chip analyzer wenca chipball for mutant kras detection in peripheral circulating cancer cells of cancer patients. Biomedical Engineering, Trends, Research and Technologies. Edited by: Komorowska Malgorzata Anna OJS. 2011, Croatia: InTechGoogle Scholar
  33. Meldrum C, Doyle MA, Tothill RW: Next-generation sequencing for cancer diagnostics: a practical perspective. Clin Biochem Rev. 2011, 32: 177-195.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ganepola GA, Nizin J, Rutledge JR, Chang DH: Use of blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and surveillance of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014, 6: 83-97. 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i4.83.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us