Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characterization of the intestinal fungal microbiome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 21, Article number: 126 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Gut mycobiota plays a crucial role in benign liver diseases; however, its correlation with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains elusive. This study aimed to elucidate fungal differences in patients with HCC-associated cirrhosis compared to cirrhotic patients without HCC and healthy controls.

Methods

The 72 fecal samples from 34 HCC patients, 20 cirrhotic patients, and 18 healthy controls were collected and analyzed using ITS2 rDNA sequencing.

Results

Our results revealed the presence of intestinal fungal dysbiosis with significant enrichment of opportunistic pathogenic fungi such as Malassezia, Malassezia sp., Candida, and C. albicans in HCC patients compared with healthy controls and cirrhosis patients. Alpha-diversity analysis demonstrated that patients with HCC and cirrhosis showed decreased fungal diversity compared to healthy controls. Beta diversity analysis indicated that the three groups exhibited significant segregated clustering. Besides, C. albicans was found to be significantly more abundant in the HCC patients with TNM stage III-IV than those with stage I-II, in contrast to the commensal organism S. cerevisiae. We also confirmed that the HCC patients were successfully classified with an area under the curve value of 0.906 based on the fecal fungal signature. Finally, our animal experiments confirm that aberrant colonization of the intestine by C. albicans and M. furfur can promote the development of HCC.

Conclusions

This study indicates that dysbiosis of the gut mycobiome might be involved in HCC development.

Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2100054537. Registered 19 December 2021, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=144550&htm=4

Introduction

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most prevalent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide [1]. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer, accounting for 80% of cases [2]. Despite recent advances in HCC therapy, the 5 year survival rate of HCC patients remains dismal due to the spread, metastases, and high rate of recurrence [3, 4]. Besides, the initial symptoms of HCC are insidious, and more than half of the HCC patients are already at an advanced stage when diagnosed, thereby missing the best treatment options [4,5,6]. Consequently, there is an urgent need to explore the mechanisms of HCC development and identify novel diagnostic markers to improve prognosis.

Currently, an increasing number of studies have noted the association between gut microbiome dysbiosis and HCC development [7,8,9,10,11]. The term “microbiome” refers to microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, protozoa, parasites, and viruses. However, the vast majority of studies have focused on intestinal bacteriome, and few studies have investigated the correlation between gut fungi and HCC. This may be because the intestinal bacteriome accounts for over 99% of the gut microbiome [12]. In reality, fungi have unique and intriguing properties that set them apart from other microbiomes. An average fungal cell is about 100-fold larger than an average bacterial cell providing abundant bioactive molecules to the host and shaping its physiology [13, 14]. Furthermore, fungi are morphologically versatile, and able to transition from unicellular (like yeast) to multicellular (such as during hyphal growth), affecting their pathogenicity. Normally, hyphae are more invasive, while yeasts are non-invasive and frequently commensal [15]. Fungi also produce a wide range of harmful and beneficial compounds. Toxic metabolites derived from fungi, also known as mycotoxins, remain in the organism and cause damage even after the fungi have been eradicated [16]. Aflatoxins (mycotoxins produced by secondary metabolism of the fungus Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus) are known to induce HCC [17]. In addition to the carcinogenic role of mycotoxins, several studies have shown that the intestinal mycobiota is directly involved in the development of colorectal, oral, and pancreatic cancer [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], and multicentre clinical research has revealed that gut fungi can be used for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer [19].

The liver and gut have a bidirectional connection through the portal vein and biliary system [27]. Potential antigens derived from gut fungi can penetrate the gastrointestinal barrier and translocate to the liver via the portal vein, compromising its function. To maintain homeostasis, immune cells that reside in or travel through the liver initiate innate and/or adaptive immune responses against gut mycobiome [28]. Recently, there have been many exciting discoveries about the roles of gut mycobiota in benign liver disease [28,29,30,31,32]. Nevertheless, little is known about the gut fungal composition in HCC patients. Thus, it is necessary to perform further studies regarding the changes in the composition of gut fungi in the progression from health, cirrhosis to HCC, thereby providing a new theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of HCC.

Materials and methods

Participant recruitment

The HCC-cirrhosis patients, liver cirrhosis (without HCC), and healthy controls were prospectively recruited at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from Dec 2021 to Jul 2022. This research was performed in conformity with the Helsinki Declaration and Rules of Good Clinical Practice. It was approved by the Clinical and Animal Research Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Platform (Registry ID: ChiCTR2100054537). All participants signed a written informed consent form. The demographic data and clinical characteristics of patients were gathered through medical records and direct interviews.

The HCC patients were diagnosed by histopathological examination of specimens from surgical resection or percutaneous ultrasound-guided liver needle core biopsy. Mixed-type liver cancer (hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) was excluded. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on the comprehensive integration of histological examination, imaging findings, laboratory parameters, clinical symptoms, physical signs, and medical history. Before stool sample collection, HCC patients had not received any standard anti-tumor therapy. The healthy controls were selected from the people who came to our hospital for a medical examination.

Individuals with other malignancies, digestive system diseases, autoimmune diseases, and acute or chronic infectious diseases (except for hepatitis B viral (HBV) infection) were excluded. Besides, all included subjects reported no probiotics or prebiotics use, no antibiotic or antifungal use, and no laxatives within 3 months.

Sample collection, DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and ITS2 sequencing

A fecal sample was collected by the participants, transported to the laboratory within 2 h, and stored at − 80 °C until total DNA was extracted. The CTAB method was applied to extract total DNA from stool samples [33]. Purity and concentration of DNA were measured by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose gels). The hypervariable ITS2 region of the ITS gene was amplified using a specific primer with the barcode. Detailed steps for PCR amplification can be found in the Additional file 1. Mix the same volume of 1 × loading buffer (contained SYB green) with the PCR products and operate electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels for detection. The Qiagen Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) was then used to purify the PCR products in the mixture. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, sequencing libraries were created using the TruSeq® DNA PCR-Free Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina, USA), and index codes were added. The Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific) was utilized to assess the library’s quality. Finally, on an Illumina Novaseq 6000 PE250 platform, the library was sequenced and 250 bp paired-end reads were generated.

Bioinformatics analysis

The NCBI Sequence Read Archive database was used to store the raw sequencing data for all samples (accession number, PRJNA887395). The raw sequencing data were reads spliced, tags filtered and chimera removed to obtain effective tags (Additional file 2: Table S1), then OTUs cluster and species annotation were conducted (Additional file 3: Table S2). Detailed steps were described in the Additional file 1. A Venn diagram was created via the R (Version 2.15.3) package “VennDiagram” to visualize the shared and unique OTUs among the three groups. The rank abundance curves were displayed using R software. The alpha diversity (Shannon and Simpson) and beta diversity on weighted_unifrac distances were calculated using QIIME (Version 1.9.1). The principal co-ordinates analysis (PCoA) analysis was completed using the WGCNA, stats, and ggplot2 packages of R software [34], and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis was performed using the vegan package of R software [35]. For multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) analysis, the MRPP function of the vegan package for R was applied [36]. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis was carried out using the LEfSe software (Version 1.0) with a default setting of 4 for the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score screening [37]. The Spearman correlation coefficient values for taxa and clinical physiological indicators were calculated for significance using the corr.test function in the psych package, and then visualized using the pheatmap package of R software. The clinical parameters with a strong influence on the flora were screened by variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis and BioENV analysis in turn, and then subjected to canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) [38, 39]. To further explore the impact of mycobiota community change, functional prediction with FUNGuild annotation tools was deployed [40]. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to explore the potential ability of intestinal fungi to discriminate between 34 HCC patients and 38 non-HCC subjects (cirrhotic patients and healthy controls). The prediction performance of the fungal microbes was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC). The combined model was estimated to use a binary logistic regression model (enter method) to calculate predicted HCC probabilities and plot ROC curves using IBM SPSS Statistics 26.

Cell culture and strain culture

Hepa1-6 cells (hepatocellular carcinoma cell line) were obtained from Wuhan University. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Biosharp, Hefei, China) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, United States) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The Candida albicans SC5314 standard strain was purchased from Biofeng Lab (Shanghai, China) and inoculated in yeast extract-peptone-D-glucose (YPD, Hopebio, Qingdao, China) and cultured for 24 h with continuous shaking at 30 °C overnight. The Malassezia furfur ATCC14521 strain was purchased from Fenghui Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Changsha, China) and inoculated in 2693 Modfied Dxn (mDxan, Hopebio, Qingdao, China) and cultured for 48 h with continuous shaking at 30 °C overnight.

Animal experiments

Male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from SHULAIBAO BIOTECHNOLOGY (Wuhan, China). Mice were given Cefoperazone (1 mg/mL) in the water for up to one week following a week of acclimation, which can promote robust C. albicans and M. furfur colonization [41] with limited impact on the bacterial microbiome in the absence of colonization [42]. Then, the mice were randomized to C. albicans, M. furfur, and control groups (6 mice per group). In both experimental groups, C. albicans and M. furfur were administered by oral gavage at a dose of 4 × 108 CFUs in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.2 ml). The control mice received gavage with PBS (0.2 ml) only. The gavage was performed every other day for 5 weeks. After the fungal gavage lasting 3 weeks, 1 × 107 Hepa1-6 cells were inoculated subcutaneously into the left flank of mice, and the mice were euthanized 2 weeks later. Tumor volume was assessed according to the formula: volume = (tumor length × tumor width2) × 0.52 [43].

Immunohistochemical staining

Mouse tumor tissue was collected for paraffin embedding. Paraffin sections were baked, dewaxed, hydrated, antigenically repaired, blocked, and incubated overnight with the anti-Ki67 antibody (Rabbit, abclonal, 1:100), then incubated with a second antibody. Images were obtained using the fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX63, Tokyo, Japan). See the Additional file 1 for detailed immunohistochemical staining procedures.

Statistical analysis

The categorical variables were compared using Fisher's exact test. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare continuous variables between the two groups. A two-sided P-value < 0.05 indicated a significant difference.

Results

Characteristics of the participants

Following a rigorous pathological diagnosis and exclusion process, 72 fecal samples from 34 HCC-cirrhosis patients, 20 cirrhosis patients, and 18 healthy controls were collected and analyzed using ITS2 rDNA sequencing. Benefiting from a uniform sample collection protocol, all stool samples were yellow and soft. The clinical characteristics of the participants, such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI), were matched among the three groups (Table 1). The patients with HCC and cirrhosis also have similar Child-Pugh and cirrhotic etiological compositions. Serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL), and direct bilirubin (DBIL) were significantly elevated, whereas albumin and platelet levels were significantly reduced in HCC patients compared with healthy controls (Table 1). Compared to the cirrhosis group, the albumin level was significantly lower in the HCC group, while the remaining serum parameters were not significantly different (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the enrolled participants
Full size table

Altered community composition in HCC patients compared to healthy controls and hepatocirrhosis patients

First, we assessed the composition of the gut fungi in our cohort. The rank abundance curves revealed that the species have good richness and uniformity in each group (Fig. 1A). The Venn diagram showed that 1961 OUTs were shared among the three groups. 2698 OTUs, 2655 OTUs, and 1084 OTUs were unique to the HCC group, cirrhosis group, and healthy controls, respectively, implying that HCC patients have the greatest abundance of unique OTUs (Fig. 1B). The fungal alpha diversity, as estimated by the Shannon diversity and Simpson diversity, was significantly reduced in patients with cirrhosis compared to healthy controls (P = 0.04 and 0.04 respectively; Fig. 1C, D). The above indicators also displayed a decreasing tendency in fungal diversity from the healthy controls to the HCC patients, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.08 and 0.14, respectively; Fig. 1C, D). However, there was no significant difference in diversity between the two patient cohorts (P = 0.65 and 0.25, respectively; Fig. 1C, D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diversity analysis in the HCC, LC, and HC groups. A Rank abundance curves. B Venn diagram displaying the overlap of OTUs identified among the three groups. Alpha diversity was estimated by the Shannon index C and Simpson index D. The distributional difference of gut mycobiota profiles was assessed using PCoA E and NMDS F based on a weighted_unifrac matrix. HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LC liver cirrhosis, HC healthy controls

Full size image

The beta diversity was next applied to explore the fungal compositions among the three groups by performing weighted_unifrac matrix. The PCoA showed that the three groups of individuals formed a fairly good separation of gut fungi (Fig. 1E). In addition, NMDS is applied to visualize the distances among the three groups, as shown in Fig. 1F, illustrating the distinct separation. MRPP analysis further confirmed the above findings (HCC vs. cirrhosis: P = 0.048; HCC vs. control: P = 0.041; cirrhosis vs. control: P = 0.021). Taken together, these results indicate the presence of altered intestinal fungal composition in patients with HCC.

Gut fungal dysbiosis in HCC-cirrhosis, including increased levels of C. albicans and Malassezia sp.

As shown in Fig. 2A, B, the cluster heatmap showed the differentially enriched fungal microbiotas among the three groups at the genus and species levels. Next, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to explore differences at the genus and species levels. The results showed that there were 32 and 47 significantly differential taxa at the genus and species levels between HCC patients and healthy controls (Additional file 4: Table S3). The eight most abundant of the above differential taxonomic units were presented in Fig. 2C, D. We found that the relative abundances of Candida, C. albicans, Malassezia, Malassezia sp., Rhizopus, Neocatenulostroma, Neocatenulostroma sp., and F. proliferatum were significantly higher in HCC patients compared to healthy controls, while the relative abundances of Actinomucor, A. elegans, Mucor, M. circinelloides, Alternaria, A. alternata, Trichocladium, and P. mandshurica were significantly lower (Fig. 2C, D). We further analyzed the fungal differences between HCC patients and cirrhosis patients, finding a significant enrichment of Candida, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, Monographella, M. nivalis, Bipolaris, Bipolaris sp., Nakaseomyces, Nakaseomyces sp., Malassezia, Malassezia sp., Sporothrix, S. ramosissima, Staphylotrichum, S. coccosporum and depletion of Archaeorhizomyces in the HCC group (Fig. 2E, F, Additional file 5: Table S4). These data point to the presence of fungal dysbiosis in HCC patients, which might be linked to hepatocellular carcinogenesis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Differential analysis of fungal communities in the HCC, LC, and HC groups. A Heatmap of fungal abundance clustering at the genus level A and species level B. The eight most abundant of the differential taxonomic units at the genus level C and species level D between HCC patients and healthy controls. The eight most abundant of the differential taxonomic units at the genus level E and species level F between HCC patients and cirrhosis patients. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used. HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LC liver cirrhosis, HC healthy controls

Full size image

To identify the specific fungal taxa associated with HCC, we further compared the fungal composition between the HCC patients and healthy controls using LEfSe. As shown in Fig. 3A and Additional file 8: Figure S1A, the intestinal mycobiota of HCC patients were enriched in Saccharomycetales fam Incertae sedis, Candida, C. albicans, Malasseziomycetes, Malasseziales, Malasseziaceae, Malassezia, and Malassezia sp.; while the gut mycobiome of healthy controls was elevated in Pleosporaceae, Alternaria, A. alternata, Mucoromycota, Mucoromycetes, Mucorales, Mucoraceae, Actinomucor, A. elegans, Mucor, and M. circinelloides. The distinct taxa at the species level were displayed as relative abundance histograms (Fig. 3B–E). Besides, we also found that there were significant differences in the fungal abundance between the HCC patients and cirrhosis-only patients. The fifteen taxa, including Saccharomycetes, Saccharomycetales, Nakaseomyces, Nakaseomyces sp., Saccharomycetales fam Incertae sedis, Candida, C. albicans, Xylariales, Malasseziomycetes, Malasseziales, Malasseziaceae, Malassezia, Malassezia sp., Bipolaris, and Bipolaris sp. were increased in the HCC group (Fig. 3F–N), while Archaeorhizomycetes, Archaeorhizomycetales, Archaeorhizomycetaceae, Archaeorhizomyces, Archaeorhizomyces sp., Archaeorhizomycetes sp., Hyponectriaceae, Monographella, M. nivalis, Lysurus, and L. cruciatus were highly enriched in the cirrhosis group (Fig. 3F–N). These differentially abundant taxa can be considered potential biomarkers.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The differential taxa in the HCC, LC, and HC groups using the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis. A LDA scores were computed for differentially abundant taxa in the gut fungi of HCC patients and healthy controls. F LDA scores were computed for differentially abundant taxa in the gut fungi of HCC patients and cirrhosis patients. Length indicates the effect size associated with a taxon. P = 0.05 for the Kruskal-Wallis sum-rank test; LDA score > 4. B–E, G–N The histogram of the relative abundance distribution of each taxon at the species level. HC healthy controls, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LC liver cirrhosis, LDA linear discriminant analysis

Full size image

Correlation between gut mycobiota with TNM stage and clinical parameters in HCC patients

To further elucidate the relationship between fungal disorders and tumor progression, we used the LEfSe method to estimate differences in fungal taxa between 19 HCC patients with TNM stage III-IV and 15 HCC patients with TNM stage I-II (8th edition of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system). The clinical characteristics of HCC patients with different TNM stages are detailed in Additional file 6: Table S5. HCC Patients with TNM stage III-IV demonstrated a significantly higher relative abundance of Saccharomycetales fam Incertae sedis, Candida, C. albicans, Archaeorhizomycetes, Archaeorhizomycetales, Archaeorhizomycetaceae, Archaeorhizomyces, Archaeorhizomyces sp. than the HCC patients with TNM stage I-II. Moreover, Saccharomycetaceae, Nakaseomyces, Nakaseomyces sp., Saccharomyces, S. cerevisiae were significantly more abundant in HCC patients with TNM stage I-II (Fig. 4A, B).

To understand the relationship between the intestinal fungi and clinical physiological parameters in HCC patients, Spearman analysis was implemented. The top 20 taxa with the highest relative abundance at the genus level were selected for analysis. Data showed that nutritional indicators and liver damage indicators significantly correlated with some fungi (Fig. 4C). For example, the abundance of Candida was significantly positively related to the level of TBIL and negatively associated with red blood cell (RBC) and hemoglobin, indicating that Candida is associated with impaired liver function and poorer nutritional status. Further, CCA analysis of the clinical parameters screened according to VIF and BioENV showed that albumin and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) were important drivers of fungal distribution in HCC patients (Fig. 4D, Additional file 7: Table S6).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation of gut mycobiota with TNM stage and clinical physiological indicators in HCC patients. A Taxonomic cladogram from LEfSe showing differences in fecal taxa of HCC patients with stage III-IV and stage I-II. B LDA scores were computed for differentially abundant taxa in the gut fungi of HCC patients with stage III-IV and stage I-II. Length indicates the effect size associated with a taxon. P = 0.05 for the Kruskal-Wallis sum-rank test; LDA score > 4; C Spearman correlation analysis of fungal taxa and clinical physiological indicators in HCC patients. D Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of clinical indicators correlated with the fungal profile of patients with HCC. HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LDA linear discriminant analysis, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, GGT gamma-glutamyltransferase, TBIL total bilirubin, DBIL direct bilirubin, TBA total bile acid, RBC red blood cell, Hb hemoglobin, PA prealbumin, TP total protein, ALB albumin, GLB globulin, WBC white blood cell, NeuC neutrophil count, LYMC lymphocyte count, MonoC monocytes count, LMR monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, NLR neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, PLT platelets, PT prothrombin, PT-act prothrombin time activity, PT-INR the international normalized ratio of prothrombin, APTT activated partial thromboplastin time, TT thrombin time, AT-III antithrombin III, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Full size image

Most of the patients included in this study had a history of HBV infection, so we further analyzed the intestinal fungal differences between 27 patients with HCC and 16 patients with cirrhosis, and those patients had a history of HBV infection. As shown in Additional file 9: Figure S2, the gut mycobiota of HCC patients was enriched in Candida, C. albicans, Bipolaris, Bipolaris sp., Nakaseomyces, Nakaseomyces sp., Sporothrix, S. ramosissima, Malassezia, Malassezia sp., etc., while the gut mycobiota of cirrhosis was elevated in Monographella, M. nivalis, Lysurus, L. cruciatus, Thermoascus, T. aurantiacus, etc.

Classification of the HCC group compared to the non-HCC group

We further explored the diagnostic ability of the top eight fungal microbials that showed the most significant differences among three groups (Fig. 2D, E). The ROC curves displayed diagnostic potential for some of these fungi, including Candida albicans (AUC = 0.749, Fig. 5A), Malassezia sp. (AUC = 0.789, Fig. 5B), Neocatenulostroma sp. (AUC = 0.711, Fig. 5C), Nakaseomyces sp. (AUC = 0.676, Fig. 5D), Candida tropicalis (AUC = 0.655, Fig. 5E), Alternaria alternata (AUC = 0.655, Fig. 5F), and Pichia membranifaciens (AUC = 0.639, Fig. 5G). The combined models (Candida albicans, Malassezia sp. and Neocatenulostroma sp.) confirmed the powerful discriminatory ability of intestinal flora in distinguishing HCC patients from healthy controls and cirrhosis (AUC = 0.906, Fig. 5H). However, the above findings are yet to be confirmed by future multicenter studies with large sample sizes.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Classification of the HCC group compared to the non-HCC group. ROC curves of Candida albicans A, Malassezia sp. B, Neocatenulostroma sp. C, Nakaseomyces sp. D, Candida tropicalis E, Alternaria alternata F, and Pichia membranifaciens G. H ROC curves analysis to evaluate the classification ability of the gut mycobiome signature (combined Candida albicans, Malassezia sp., and Neocatenulostroma sp.) in predicting different groups. ROC receiver operating characteristic, AUC area under the curve

Full size image

Functional classification prediction of the specific taxonomic

Because of lacking a powerful tool for annotating the function of fungi, we concentrated on the functional guilds of the fungal microorganisms instead, using FUNGuild. As shown in Fig. 6A, B, the clustered heatmap revealed distinctively differential functions among HCC patients, cirrhotic patients, and healthy controls. Specifically, the pathotrophs, such as plant pathogen, animal pathogen-undefined saprotroph, and animal pathogen-endophyte-plant saprotroph-soil saprotroph, were significantly enriched in the HCC group (Fig. 6A, B); the saprotrophs, including soil saprotroph and dung saprotroph-soil saprotroph, and animal pathogen-endophyte-plant pathogen-wood saprotroph were remarkably increased in the cirrhosis group (Fig. 6B); while the saprotrophs, such as soil saprotroph and undefined saprotroph-wood saprotroph, and ectomycorrhiza were significantly enriched in the healthy controls (Fig. 6A). Thus, our analysis indicates that the symbiotic ecological relationships of gut fungi are altered in patients with HCC and are dominated by pathological parasitism, which can receive nutrients from and adversely affect host cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Functional classification predictions. Fungal functional annotations between the HCC and healthy controls A and between the HCC and liver cirrhosis B were performed by FUNGuild. Fungi were divided into different categories at the Guild levels according to the ways of absorption and utilization of environmental resources. HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, LC liver cirrhosis, HC healthy controls

Full size image

C. albicans and M. furfur promote the progression of HCC

To confirm whether C. albicans and M. furfur are involved in HCC development, we treated C57BL/6 mice with oral gavage of PBS, C. albicans, or M. furfur and inoculated them with subcutaneous tumors (Fig. 7A, B). We found that after 2 weeks post exposure, the tumor volume and weight were significantly increased in the C. albicans and M. furfur groups, while there was no significant difference in the body weight among the three groups (Fig. 7C–E, Additional file 10: Figure S3). IHC staining confirmed that more proliferative cells were observed in the xenografts of the C. albicans and M. furfur groups as indicated by Ki-67 staining (Fig. 7F, G). These results indicate that abnormal colonization by C. albicans and M. furfur contributes to HCC development.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Abnormal colonization of C. albicans and M. furfur can promote HCC development. A Schematic diagram of the oral gavage intervention protocol using phosphate-buffered saline, C. albicans or M. furfur for C57BL/6 mice (6 mice per group). The images of tumor-bearing mice B and tumor masses C. Tumor volume D and weight E were compared among the three groups at the end of the experiment. F Representative images of subcutaneous tumor among the three groups immunostained with Ki67 (200 ×). G Quantification of Ki67 + cells. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used

Full size image

Discussion

Liver cancer is a highly aggressive but silent malignancy because of the tremendous compensating abilities of the liver. In this study, we revealed, for the first time, the presence of intestinal fungal dysbiosis with significant enrichment of opportunistic pathogenic fungi, including Malassezia, Malassezia sp., Candida, and C. albicans in HCC patients compared with healthy controls and cirrhotic patients. Among these, the abundance of C. albicans was remarkably higher in HCC patients with stage III-IV than in those with stage I-II. The animal experiments confirm that aberrant colonization in the intestine by C. albicans and M. furfur can promote the development of HCC.

In our study, we found that alpha diversity was significantly lower in cirrhosis compared to healthy controls, which is consistent with the findings of Bajaj et al. [32]. They found that gut fungal diversity was significantly lower in 77 outpatients and 66 inpatients with cirrhosis than in 26 control populations. This implies that the sample selection in our study was representative.

Notably, the levels of Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus (aflatoxin producers) were similar among the three groups. Previous studies have revealed that Malassezia usually exists in the skin and has the ability to colonize the gastrointestinal tract [44, 45]. Recently, Aykut et al. [23] were the first to find that Malassezia can migrate from the gut to the pancreas and promote pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma through activation of the mannose-binding lectin and complement-3 pathway. We have found through Malassezia colonization experiments that it can promote the progression of liver cancer.

Interestingly, the alterations in C. albicans were more prominent as the TNM stage of HCC advanced. Currently, C. albicans is by far the most studied opportunistic pathogenic fungi. The carcinogenic effect of C. albicans has long been disclosed in multiple cancers [24, 46,47,48,49,50]. For example, Vadovics et al. [24] revealed that C. albicans accelerated oral cancer development by upregulating the synthesis of matrix metalloproteinases, oncometabolite, and pro-tumor signaling pathways, as well as upregulating prognostic marker genes linked to metastatic events. Zhu and his colleagues [48] reported that the C. albicans abundance was remarkably higher in patients with colitis-associated cancer. The increase in C. albicans can induce the upregulation of glycolysis in macrophages through the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 pathway, triggering an increase in the secretion of interleukin (IL)-7 from macrophages [48]. IL-7 induce IL-22 production in intestinal intrinsic lymphocytes 3, which in turn promotes the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells and the progression of colitis-associated cancer [48]. By interacting with Dectin-1 in intestinal epithelial cells, C. albicans also promote the proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells [47]. In line with these findings, our animal studies also confirm the pro-cancer role of C. albicans in the development of HCC.

Besides, the AUC showed that the combined model had very satisfactory diagnostic performance. However, it is worth noting that the sample size included in this study was limited, and it was a single-center study, so it is not possible to conclude from this study that gut fungal flora characteristics can be used as a potential diagnostic tool for HCC, which needs to be explored in a large multi-center sample in the future. It should also be noted that this study only briefly verified the carcinogenic effects of C. albicans and Malassezia. The detailed carcinogenic mechanisms of intestinal fungi need to be further investigated in order to provide a new theoretical basis for the treatment of HCC.

Conclusion

This study revealed the presence of intestinal fungal dysbiosis with significant enrichment of opportunistic pathogenic fungi in HCC patients. The animal experiments confirm that aberrant colonization in the intestine by C. albicans and M. furfur can promote the development of HCC.

Availability of data and materials

The primary accession code for sequence data supporting the findings of this study is PRJNA887395 at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The remaining data can be found within the article, supplemental information, or by contacting the authors directly.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Balogh J, Victor D 3rd, Asham EH, Burroughs SG, Boktour M, Saharia A, Li X, Ghobrial RM, Monsour HP Jr. Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2016;3:41–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dutta R, Mahato RI. Recent advances in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 2017;173:106–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang JD, Heimbach JK. New advances in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. BMJ. 2020;371:m3544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bertuccio P, Turati F, Carioli G, Rodriguez T, La Vecchia C, Malvezzi M, Negri E. Global trends and predictions in hepatocellular carcinoma mortality. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Zucman-Rossi J, Pikarsky E, Sangro B, Schwartz M, Sherman M, Gores G. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren Z, Li A, Jiang J, Zhou L, Yu Z, Lu H, Xie H, Chen X, Shao L, Zhang R, et al. Gut microbiome analysis as a tool towards targeted non-invasive biomarkers for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2019;68(6):1014–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng T, Li J, He B, Chen B, Liu F, Chen Z, Zheng J, Shi Z, Zhang T, Deng L, et al. Gut microbiome alteration as a diagnostic tool and associated with inflammatory response marker in primary liver cancer. Hepatol Int. 2022;16(1):99–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Behary J, Amorim N, Jiang XT, Raposo A, Gong L, McGovern E, Ibrahim R, Chu F, Stephens C, Jebeili H, et al. Gut microbiota impact on the peripheral immune response in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease related hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Albhaisi S, Shamsaddini A, Fagan A, McGeorge S, Sikaroodi M, Gavis E, Patel S, Davis BC, Acharya C, Sterling RK, et al. Gut microbial signature of hepatocellular cancer in men with cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2021;27(5):629–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponziani FR, Bhoori S, Castelli C, Putignani L, Rivoltini L, Del Chierico F, Sanguinetti M, Morelli D, Paroni Sterbini F, Petito V, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with gut microbiota profile and inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2019;69(1):107–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, Nielsen T, Pons N, Levenez F, Yamada T, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7285):59–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Huffnagle GB, Noverr MC. The emerging world of the fungal microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21(7):334–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Halwachs B, Madhusudhan N, Krause R, Nilsson RH, Moissl-Eichinger C, Högenauer C, Thallinger GG, Gorkiewicz G. Critical issues in mycobiota analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gauthier GM. Fungal dimorphism and virulence: molecular mechanisms for temperature adaptation, immune evasion, and in vivo survival. Mediators Inflamm. 2017;2017:8491383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Keller NP. Fungal secondary metabolism: regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17(3):167–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Magnussen A, Parsi MA. Aflatoxins, hepatocellular carcinoma and public health. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(10):1508–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu NN, Jiao N, Tan JC, Wang Z, Wu D, Wang AJ, Chen J, Tao L, Zhou C, Fang W, et al. Multi-kingdom microbiota analyses identify bacterial-fungal interactions and biomarkers of colorectal cancer across cohorts. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7(2):238–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Coker OO, Nakatsu G, Dai RZ, Wu WKK, Wong SH, Ng SC, Chan FKL, Sung JJY, Yu J. Enteric fungal microbiota dysbiosis and ecological alterations in colorectal cancer. Gut. 2019;68(4):654–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang T, Fan C, Yao A, Xu X, Zheng G, You Y, Jiang C, Zhao X, Hou Y, Hung MC, et al. The adaptor protein CARD9 protects against colon cancer by restricting mycobiota-mediated expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Immunity. 2018;49(3):504-514.e504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Conche C, Greten FR. Fungi enter the stage of colon carcinogenesis. Immunity. 2018;49(3):384–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alam A, Levanduski E, Denz P, Villavicencio HS, Bhatta M, Alhorebi L, Zhang Y, Gomez EC, Morreale B, Senchanthisai S, et al. Fungal mycobiome drives IL-33 secretion and type 2 immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2022.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Aykut B, Pushalkar S, Chen R, Li Q, Abengozar R, Kim JI, Shadaloey SA, Wu D, Preiss P, Verma N, et al. The fungal mycobiome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via activation of MBL. Nature. 2019;574(7777):264–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Vadovics M, Ho J, Igaz N, Alföldi R, Rakk D, Veres É, Szücs B, Horváth M, Tóth R, Szücs A, et al. Candida albicans enhances the progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. mBio. 2022;13(1):e0314421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Perera M, Al-Hebshi NN, Perera I, Ipe D, Ulett GC, Speicher DJ, Chen T, Johnson NW. A dysbiotic mycobiome dominated by Candida albicans is identified within oral squamous-cell carcinomas. J Oral Microbiol. 2017;9(1):1385369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang L, Chai D, Chen C, Li C, Qiu Z, Kuang T, Parveena M, Dong K, Yu J, Deng W, et al. Mycobiota and C-type lectin receptors in cancers: know thy neighbors. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:946995.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang L, Schnabl B. Gut microbiota in liver disease: what do we know and what do we not know? Physiology. 2020;35(4):261–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeng S, Schnabl B. Roles for the mycobiome in liver disease. Liver Int. 2022;42(4):729–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang AM, Inamine T, Hochrath K, Chen P, Wang L, Llorente C, Bluemel S, Hartmann P, Xu J, Koyama Y, et al. Intestinal fungi contribute to development of alcoholic liver disease. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(7):2829–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lang S, Duan Y, Liu J, Torralba MG, Kuelbs C, Ventura-Cots M, Abraldes JG, Bosques-Padilla F, Verna EC, Brown RS Jr, et al. Intestinal fungal dysbiosis and systemic immune response to fungi in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2020;71(2):522–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. You N, Xu J, Wang L, Zhuo L, Zhou J, Song Y, Ali A, Luo Y, Yang J, Yang W, et al. Fecal fungi dysbiosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Obesity. 2021;29(2):350–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bajaj JS, Liu EJ, Kheradman R, Fagan A, Heuman DM, White M, Gavis EA, Hylemon P, Sikaroodi M, Gillevet PM. Fungal dysbiosis in cirrhosis. Gut. 2018;67(6):1146–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujimura KE, Sitarik AR, Havstad S, Lin DL, Levan S, Fadrosh D, Panzer AR, LaMere B, Rackaityte E, Lukacs NW, et al. Neonatal gut microbiota associates with childhood multisensitized atopy and T cell differentiation. Nat Med. 2016;22(10):1187–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Minchin PR. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio. 1987;69(1):89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kruskal JB. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika. 1964;29(2):115–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. O’Reilly FJ, Mielke PW. Asymptotic normality of MRPP statistics from invariance principles of u-statistics. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1980;9(6):629–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12(6):R60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Sheik CS, Mitchell TW, Rizvi FZ, Rehman Y, Faisal M, Hasnain S, McInerney MJ, Krumholz LR. Exposure of soil microbial communities to chromium and arsenic alters their diversity and structure. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e40059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Clarke KR, Ainsworth M. A method of linking multivariate community structure to environmental variables. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1993;92(3):205–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nhn A, Zs B, Stb B, Sb C, Lt D, Jm A, Jss E, Pgka F. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 2016;20(1):241–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noverr MC, Noggle RM, Toews GB, Huffnagle GB. Role of antibiotics and fungal microbiota in driving pulmonary allergic responses. Infect Immun. 2004;72(9):4996–5003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Erb Downward JR, Falkowski NR, Mason KL, Muraglia R, Huffnagle GB. Modulation of post-antibiotic bacterial community reassembly and host response by Candida albicans. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Erkes DA, Cai W, Sanchez IM, Purwin TJ, Rogers C, Field CO, Berger AC, Hartsough EJ, Rodeck U, Alnemri ES, et al. Mutant BRAF and MEK inhibitors regulate the tumor immune microenvironment via pyroptosis. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(2):254–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Richard ML, Lamas B, Liguori G, Hoffmann TW, Sokol H. Gut fungal microbiota: the Yin and Yang of inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(3):656–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sokol H, Leducq V, Aschard H, Pham HP, Jegou S, Landman C, Cohen D, Liguori G, Bourrier A, Nion-Larmurier I, et al. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut. 2017;66(6):1039–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhong M, Xiong Y, Zhao J, Gao Z, Ma J, Wu Z, Song Y, Hong X. Candida albicans disorder is associated with gastric carcinogenesis. Theranostics. 2021;11(10):4945–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang Y, Ren Y, Huang Y, Yu X, Yang Y, Wang D, Shi L, Tao K, Wang G, Wu K. Fungal dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is associated with colorectal cancer in Chinese patients. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(10):11287–301.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhu Y, Shi T, Lu X, Xu Z, Qu J, Zhang Z, Shi G, Shen S, Hou Y, Chen Y, et al. Fungal-induced glycolysis in macrophages promotes colon cancer by enhancing innate lymphoid cell secretion of IL-22. Embo J. 2021;40(11):e105320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Shiao SL, Kershaw KM, Limon JJ, You S, Yoon J, Ko EY, Guarnerio J, Potdar AA, McGovern DPB, Bose S, et al. Commensal bacteria and fungi differentially regulate tumor responses to radiation therapy. Cancer Cell. 2021;39(9):1202-1213.e1206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu Z, Li Y, Li C, Lei G, Zhou L, Chen X, Jia X, Lu Y. Intestinal Candida albicans promotes hepatocarcinogenesis by up-regulating NLRP6. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:812771.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No.

Funding

This work was supported by Grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82172855, 81870442), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (No. 2021CFB365) and Beijing Health Alliance Charitable Foundation (No. 2022HX0018).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lilong Zhang and Chen Chen contributed equally to this work

  2. Wenhong Deng and Weixing Wang contributed equally to this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, No.238, Jiefang Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei, China

    Lilong Zhang, Chen Chen, Dongqi Chai, Chunlei Li, Zhendong Qiu, Tianrui Kuang, Li Liu, Wenhong Deng & Weixing Wang

  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Digestive System Disease, No.238, Jiefang Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei, China

    Lilong Zhang, Dongqi Chai, Chunlei Li, Zhendong Qiu, Tianrui Kuang & Li Liu

  3. Central Laboratory, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, No. 238, Jiefang Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei, China

    Lilong Zhang, Chen Chen, Dongqi Chai, Chunlei Li, Zhendong Qiu, Tianrui Kuang, Li Liu, Wenhong Deng & Weixing Wang

Authors
  1. Lilong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chen Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dongqi Chai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunlei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhendong Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tianrui Kuang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Li Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wenhong Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Weixing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZL, DW, CC, and WW conceived and designed the study. ZL and CC were responsible for the collection of sample and clinical data. ZL, DW, CD, CC, LC, KT, QZ, and LL were responsible for data analysis and animal experiments. ZL, DW, CC, and WW were involved in writing the manuscript and revised the manuscript. All the work was performed under DW and WW instructions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. ZL and CC contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenhong Deng or Weixing Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Clinical and animal Research Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University approved the study. Patients involved obtained informed consent in the study. We confirmed that all methods were carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Additional detailed experimental methodology.

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Table of sequence splicing information, data pre-processing statistics, and quality control information for samples. Combined_reads, Tags sequence from stitching; Qualified, raw Tags filtering low quality and short length sequences; Nochime, after filtering the chimeras, the final Tags sequences used for subsequent analysis, i.e. Effective Tags; Uncombined_reads, sequence of reads that cannot be spliced; Percent_combined(%), ratio of reads from splicing to total_reads from the original down; Effective%, number of Effective Tags as a percentage of the number of total_reads.

Additional file 3:

Table S2. OTUs clustering and species annotation results.

Additional file 4:

Table S3. The differential taxa between the HCC patients and healthy controls at the genus and species levels. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HC, healthy controls. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used.

Additional file 5:

Table S4. The differential taxa between the HCC patients and cirrhosis patients at the genus and species levels. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LC, liver cirrhosis. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used.

Additional file 6:

Table S5. Clinical characteristics of patients with HCC at different TNM stages.

Additional file 7:

Table S6. CCA analysis of clinical parameters and fungal distribution in patients with HCC.

Additional file 8:

Figure S1. Taxonomic cladogram. (A) Taxonomic cladogram from LEfSe showing differences in fecal taxa of HCC patients and healthy controls. (B) Taxonomic cladogram from LEfSe showing differences in fecal taxa of HCC patients and cirrhosis patients. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LC, liver cirrhosis; HC, healthy controls.

Additional file 9:

Figure S2. Differential analysis of fungal communities between the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatitis B viral infection) and cirrhosis (hepatitis B viral infection). (A) Taxonomic cladogram from LEfSe showing differences in fecal taxa of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatitis B viral infection) and cirrhosis (hepatitis B viral infection). (B) LDA scores were computed for differentially abundant taxa in the gut fungi of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (hepatitis B viral infection) and cirrhosis (hepatitis B viral infection). Length indicates the effect size associated with a taxon. P = 0.05 for the Kruskal-Wallis sum-rank test; LDA score > 4; LDA, linear discriminant analysis; HBVHCC, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis B virus infection; HBVLC, patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis B virus infection.

Additional file 10: Figure S3

. The mice weight was compared among the PBS group, C. albicans group and M. furfur group at the end of the experiment. nsP > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank sum test was used.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Chen, C., Chai, D. et al. Characterization of the intestinal fungal microbiome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med 21, 126 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03940-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03940-y

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us