Skip to main content
Download PDF

Inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide exerts antileukemia activity and increases chemosensitivity through Smo/Gli-1 pathway in acute myeloid leukemia

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 19, Article number: 117 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Epigenetic dysregulation plays important roles in leukemogenesis and the progression of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) reciprocally regulate the acetylation and deacetylation of nuclear histones. Aberrant activation of HDACs results in uncontrolled proliferation and blockade of differentiation, and HDAC inhibition has been investigated as epigenetic therapeutic strategy against AML.

Methods

Cell growth was assessed with CCK-8 assay, and apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry in AML cell lines and CD45 + and CD34 + CD38- cells from patient samples after staining with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI). EZH2 was silenced with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or overexpressed by lentiviral transfection. Changes in signaling pathways were detected by western blotting. The effect of chidamide or EZH2-specific shRNA (shEZH2) in combination with adriamycin was studied in vivo in leukemia-bearing nude mouse models.

Results

In this study, we investigated the antileukemia effects of HDAC inhibitor chidamide and its combinatorial activity with cytotoxic agent adriamycin in AML cells. We demonstrated that chidamide suppressed the levels of EZH2, H3K27me3 and DNMT3A, exerted potential antileukemia activity and increased the sensitivity to adriamycin through disruption of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and downstream signaling target p-AKT in AML cells and stem/progenitor cells. In addition to decreasing the levels of H3K27me3 and DNMT3A, inhibition of EZH2 either pharmacologically by chidamide or genetically by shEZH2 suppressed the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and increased the antileukemia activity of adriamycin against AML in vitro and in vivo.

Conclusions

Inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide has antileukemia activity and increases the chemosensitivity to adriamycin through Smo/Gli-1 pathway in AML cells (Fig. 5). These findings support the rational combination of HDAC inhibitors and chemotherapy for the treatment of AML.

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common adult hematological malignancy with a poor prognosis. Nearly 80% of patients achieve initial remission after induction chemotherapy, but most relapse and then fail to reinduction chemotherapy1. Treatment failure is associated with simultaneous resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and survival of leukemia stem cells (LSCs) [2]. Recent studies have shown that constitutive activation of multiple pathways contributes to chemoresistance in AML [3, 4]. Epigenetic modification regulates various biological functions, such as histone acetylation and deacetylation, DNA methylation and demethylation5, 6. Epigenetic dysregulation plays important roles in leukemogenesis and progression, and targeted epigenetic regulation is a promising therapeutic strategy against AML [7, 8].

Histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) reciprocally regulate the acetylation and deacetylation of nuclear histones [9]. Histone modification directly affects the nucleosome structure and activities of oncogenes and transcription factors [10]. Aberrant activation of HDACs regulates the expression of multiple genes and activities of signaling pathways, resulting in uncontrolled proliferation and blockade of differentiation related to leukemogenesis in myeloid malignancies [12, 13]. HDAC inhibitors suppress proliferation and induce apoptosis and have synergistic antileukemia effects in combination with cytotoxic agents in AML cells [14, 15]. Chidamide, a novel benzamide-type HDAC inhibitor, has been demonstrated to induce cell differentiation and apoptosis by specifically inhibiting HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3 and HDAC10 [16]. It was initially developed to treat T/B-cell lymphoma/leukemia, breast cancer and lung cancer [17,18,19,20]. Recent studies have shown that chidamide significantly inhibits the viability of AML cells and LSCs and increases the sensitivity to cytotoxic agents by disrupting multiple pathways, activating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and accumulating DNA damage [21,22,23,24]. Thus, HDAC inhibition provides a potential strategy to improve chemotherapeutic effects in AML. However, the mechanisms of action of chidamide are not fully understood.

It has been reported that inhibition of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) contributes to the antitumor effect of HDAC inhibitors in neuroblastoma cells and lung cancer cells [25, 26]. EZH2 is the functional core subunit of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) and plays a pivotal role in catalyzing the methylation of lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27) [27, 28]. Overexpression of EZH2 indicates a poor prognosis in patients with lymphoma, melanoma, or breast cancer, and EZH2 is considered as a potential therapy target in malignant tumors [29, 30]. EZH2 supports leukemogenesis by blocking cell differentiation in AML, and inhibition of EZH2 is an effective strategy to eliminate LSCs through Hedgehog pathway [31,32,33]. Smo/Gli-1 is the key component of signal transduction in Hedgehog pathway, which is closely associated with the chemoresistance of AML cells and survival of LSCs [34,35,36]. Disruption of the Smo/Gli-1 pathway has been demonstrated to improve chemotherapeutic effects in AML, and Smo inhibitors have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat AML patients in combination with chemotherapy [37,38,39]. A recent study showed that an EZH2 inhibitor increased the sensitivity to cytotoxic agent 5-fluorouracil through Smo/Gli-1 pathway in colorectal cancer [40]. Strategies to improve chemotherapeutic effects are also needed for the treatment of AML.

Our previous studies showed that EZH2 overexpression and activation of Smo/Gli-1 pathway were related to the poor prognosis in AML patients, and Smo inhibitor effectively decreased leukemia growth and increased chemosensitivity [41,42,43]. Chidamide has a promising antileukemia effect without clear mechanism in AML. In this study, we demonstrated that chidamide exerted antileukemia activity in AML cells and stem/progenitor cells and increased sensitivity to adriamycin in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting EZH2 through Smo/Gli-1 pathway.

Materials and methods

Cells

Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (Institutes for Biological Sciences Cell Resource Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Bone marrow samples were obtained from AML patients, except those with the M3 subtype, and healthy donors for stem cell transplantation after informed consent was obtained following approval by the institutional ethics committee at Nanfang Hospital in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Mononuclear cells were purified by Ficoll-Hypaque (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) density gradient centrifugation and cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of the patients.

Table 1 Characteristics of AML patients and experiments
Full size table

Cell growth assay

Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (2 × 105 cells/ml) were plated in 96-well plates and treated with chidamide (Chipscreen Biosciences, China), adriamycin (MedChem Express, USA), or their combination. Cell growth was assessed with CCK-8 assay kit (Dojindo, Japan). After cells were incubated with 10 µL of CCK-8 solution for 2 h at 37 °C, the absorbance of each well was measured at 450 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Cell viability was determined for the cells in each treated group and compared with that of untreated cells. The drug concentration resulting in 50% inhibition of cell growth (IC50) was calculated to evaluate the sensitivity of Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells to adriamycin.

Flow cytometry analysis

Kasumi-1, HL-60/ADM cells (2 × 105 cells/ml) and patient samples (5 × 105 cells/ml) were treated with chidamide, adriamycin, or their combination. Cell apoptosis was estimated by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, USA) after cells were stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) (NanJing KeyGen Biotechnology, China). Apoptosis in CD45 + and CD34 + CD38- cells was evaluated by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, USA) after patient samples were incubated with anti-CD45-APC, anti-CD34-PC5.5 and anti-CD38-PE Cy7 antibodies (BD Biosciences, USA) and stained with Annexin V-FITC (NanJing KeyGen Biotechnology, China).

EZH2 silencing and overexpression

A lentivirus carrying EZH2-specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and an EZH2-overexpressing lentivirus (LV-EZH2) were constructed by GeneChem (Shanghai, China). The targeting sequences for EZH2-specific shRNA (shEZH2) were as follows: shRNA-1, 5′-AACAGCTGCCTTAGCTTCA-3′; shRNA-2, 5′-AACAGCTCTAGACAACAAA-3′; shRNA-3, 5′-GGATAGAGAATGTGGGTTT-3′. The negative control for shEZH2 was a nontarget scrambled sequence: 5′-TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT-3′. Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were transfected with lentivirus carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) and sorted by flow cytometry as described in our previous study [49]. The effects of EZH2 silencing or overexpression were confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and western blotting. The Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells with the best EZH2 silencing efficacy and stable EZH2 overexpression were used in subsequent experiments.

Western blotting analysis

Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide, adriamycin, or their combination, and cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Protein levels were determined by western blotting as previously described [1, 44]. Briefly, whole-cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, USA). Membranes were probed with an appropriate primary antibody and then incubated with a secondary antibody. The immunoblots were visualized using chemiluminescence horseradish peroxidase substrate (Millipore, USA) and analyzed with the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA). Antibodies against acetyl-histone H3 (#8173), DNMT3A (#3598), H3K27me3 (#9733), EZH2 (#5246), Smo (#4940), Gli-1 (#2643), AKT (#4685), p-AKT (#9614) and GAPDH (#5174) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). GAPDH was used as a loading control.

In vivo studies

Animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the Nanfang Hospital Animal Care and Use Committee. Kasumi-1 or shEZH2 Kasumi-1 cells (1 × 107) were injected subcutaneously into the right posterior flank of BALB/c nude mice. When the tumor size reached 150–200 mm3, the Kasumi-1 tumor-bearing mice were randomized to the following treatment groups (n = 10/group): vehicle control, adriamycin (3 mg/kg/d) by intraperitoneal injection, chidamide (12.5 mg/kg/d) by oral gavage or adriamycin plus chidamide for 7 days. Mice with shEZH2 Kasumi-1 neoplasms were randomized to the following treatment groups (n = 10/group): vehicle control and adriamycin (3 mg/kg/d) by intraperitoneal injection for 7 days. Tumor volume was calculated as V = 0.5 × longest × shortest2. Three mice in each group were sacrificed after treatment, and the tumors were weighed and fixed in 10% neutral formalin overnight. Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed to determine the protein expression of EZH2, Smo, Gli-1, and p-AKT in the tumor tissues.

Statistical analysis

Cell experiments were conducted in triplicate, and data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparisons of multiple groups. P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Results

Chidamide, a novel HDAC inhibitor, suppresses growth and induces apoptosis in AML cells and stem/progenitor cells

Kasumi-1, HL-60/ADM and primary AML cells were treated with HDAC inhibitor chidamide. Cell viability was determined with CCK-8 assay, and apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry after Annexin-FITC/PI staining. Chidamide markedly inhibited cell growth in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells after treatment for 24, 48 or 72 h (Fig. 1a). Apoptosis was obviously induced in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells after treatment with 5.00, 10.00, 20.00 or 40.00 μmol/L chidamide for 48 h (Fig. 1b). We also observed apoptosis in CD45 + and CD34 + CD38- stem/progenitor cells from AML patients after treatment with 20.00 or 40.00 μmol/L chidamide for 48 h (Fig. 1c), which had limited cytotoxicity in normal CD45 + and CD34 + cells from healthy donors (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chidamide suppresses growth and induces apoptosis in AML cells and stem/progenitor cells. a Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide for 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell viability was assessed with CCK-8. b Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide for 48 h. Apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. c Patient samples were treated with chidamide for 48 h. Apoptosis in CD45 + and CD34 + CD38- cells was measured by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05: **P < 0.01

Full size image

Chidamide sensitizes AML cells and stem/progenitor cells to adriamycin

Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide, adriamycin or their combination for 24 h. 1.00 μmol/L chidamide did not inhibit proliferation, but significantly increased the growth inhibition mediated by adriamycin (Fig. 2a), the IC50 value of which was reduced from 1.39 ± 0.24 to 0.15 ± 0.05 μmol/L for Kasumi-1 cells and from 1.79 ± 0.13 to 0.25 ± 0.02 μmol/L for HL-60/ADM cells, indicating that 1.00 μmol/L chidamide increased the sensitivity of AML cells to adriamycin. We then treated Kasumi-1, HL-60/ADM cells and primary AML blasts with 1.00 μmol/L chidamide and 0.13 μmol/L adriamycin for 48 h. Chidamide (1.00 μmol/L) alone did not have cytotoxic activity, but it significantly increased adriamycin-induced apoptosis in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (Fig. 2b), as well as in CD45 + cells and CD34 + CD38- stem/progenitor cells from AML patients (Fig. 2c). However, chidamide (1.00 μmol/L) did not increase adriamycin-induced apoptosis in normal CD45 + or CD34 + cells from healthy donors (Additional file 2: Fig. S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Chidamide sensitizes AML cells and stem/progenitor cells to adriamycin. a Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide, adriamycin or both for 24 h. Cell viability was assessed with CCK-8. b Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide (1.00 μmol/L), adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) or both for 48 h. Apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. c Patient samples were treated with chidamide (1.00 μmol/L), adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) or both for 48 h. Apoptosis in CD45 + and CD34 + CD38- cells was measured by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Ctrl control, Chi chidamide, ADM Adriamycin, Comb combination

Full size image

Inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide exerts antileukemia activity and increases adriamycin sensitivity through Smo/Gli-1 pathway

To understand the mechanisms of action, we treated Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells with chidamide, adriamycin or their combination and determined the protein levels after treatment for 48 or 72 h by western blotting. Chidamide (10.00 μmol/L) resulted in the accumulation of acetylated histone 3 and decreased the levels of H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and DNMT3A in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (Fig. 3a). We discovered that 10.00 μmol/L chidamide inhibited the expression of EZH2, the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and downstream signaling target p-AKT after treatment for 48 h, and the targeted inhibition was even more effective after 72 h of treatment (Fig. 3a). This result indicated that 10.00 μmol/L chidamide inhibited the expression of EZH2 and downstream targeted trimethylation of H3K27 and DNMT3A. Interestingly, chidamide decreased the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway, coinciding with the potential inhibition of EZH2 expression in AML cells. Moreover, 1.00 μmol/L chidamide slightly suppressed EZH2 and p-AKT expression and Smo/Gli-1 pathway activity after treatment for 48 h, and the inhibitory effects were more obvious after combination with adriamycin in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (Fig. 3b). This suggests that chidamide may inhibit the Smo/Gli-1 pathway through disruption of EZH2 expression and increase the cytotoxic effect of adriamycin in AML cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide decreases the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and increases sensitivity to adriamycin in AML cells. a Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide (10.00 μmol/L) for 48, 72 h. b Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with chidamide (1.00 μmol/L), adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) or both for 48 h. c EZH2 was silenced with shEZH2. d Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were transfected with LV-EZH2. e Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with LED225 (5.00 μmol/L) for 48 h. Expression of EZH2 and Smo/Gli-1 signaling and downstream targets were determined by western blotting. f Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells with nontarget scrambled sequence (Scramble) or shEZH2 were treated with adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) for 48 h. Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells were treated with LED225 (5.00 μmol/L), adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) or both for 48 h. g Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells with LV-eGFP or LV-EZH2 were treated with chidamide (20.00 μmol/L) or adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) for 48 h. Apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Ctrl control, Chi chidamide, shEZH2 EZH2 shRNA, LV-EZH2 EZH2-overexpressing lentivirus, LV-eGFP lentivirus vector carrying enhanced green fluorescent protein, ADM adriamycin

Full size image

To test this hypothesis, we silenced EZH2 with shRNA or overexpressed EZH2 in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells. We found that genetic inhibition of EZH2 suppressed the Smo/Gli-1 pathway and downstream signaling molecule p-AKT, in addition to decreasing the levels of H3K27me3 and DNMT3A (Fig. 3c). EZH2 overexpression increased these signaling activities and the expression of downstream targets (Fig. 3d). Moreover, Smo inhibitor LED225 abrogated the activities of Smo/Gli-1 pathway, but had no effect on the levels of EZH2, H3K27me3 and DNMT3A (Fig. 3e). We also observed that shEZH2 and LED225 each increased the sensitivity to adriamycin (Fig. 3f) and that EZH2 overexpression decreased apoptosis induction by 20.00 μmol/L chidamide or 0.13 μmol/L adriamycin (Fig. 3g), although apoptosis was slightly induced after EZH2 silencing or overexpression in Kasumi-1 and HL-60/ADM cells (Fig. 3f, g). These data indicated that inhibition of EZH2 either pharmacologically by chidamide or genetically by shEZH2 decreased the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and increased adriamycin sensitivity, and genetic EZH2 overexpression reduced the cytotoxicity of chidamide and restored the resistance to adriamycin in AML cells.

Chidamide suppresses EZH2 and Smo/Gli-1 signaling and enhances the antileukemia activity of adriamycin in an AML xenograft mouse model

We used a leukemia-bearing mouse model to test the in vivo antileukemic and chemosensitizing activities of chidamide in AML. In our study, Kasumi-1 cells were subcutaneously implanted into BALB/c nude mice to establish an AML xenograft mouse model. Treatment with adriamycin or chidamide inhibited leukemia growth, as measured by tumor volume and weight in the mouse models, and the combination of adriamycin and chidamide was the most effective strategy in this regard (Fig. 4a and c). These results indicated that chidamide increased the antileukemia activity of adriamycin in leukemia-bearing mice. To further demonstrate that the effect of chidamide on chemosensitivity in vivo was mediated in part through EZH2 inhibition, Kasumi-1 cells transfected with shEZH2 were subcutaneously implanted to establish a leukemia-bearing mouse model. We observed that depletion of EZH2 increased the antileukemia activity of adriamycin in the mouse models (Fig. 4b, c). Histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations showed that chidamide decreased the expression of EZH2 and inhibited the Smo/Gli-1 pathway and downstream signaling molecule p-AKT (Fig. 4d). Genetic inhibition of EZH2 also suppressed the Smo/Gli-1 signaling pathway in leukemic tumor tissues (Fig. 4d). These in vivo data suggested that EZH2 inhibition by chidamide or shEZH2 decreased leukemia growth and increased the antileukemia effect of adriamycin through suppression of Smo/Gli-1 pathway in the leukemia-bearing mouse models.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Chidamide enhances the antileukemia activity of adriamycin in leukemia-bearing mouse models. a Kasumi-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with chidamide, adriamycin or both for 7 days. b shEZH2 Kasumi-1 tumor-bearing mice were treated with adriamycin for 7 days. c Tumor sizes. Tumor volume and weight were measured to assess leukemia burden in mouse models. d Expression of EZH2 and Smo/Gli-1 signaling were determined by histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations in leukemic tumor tissues. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Ctrl control, Chi chidamide, shEZH2 EZH2 shRNA, ADM Adriamycin, Comb combination

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the antileukemia activity of HDAC inhibitor chidamide alone and in combination with adriamycin in AML cells in vitro and in vivo. We discovered that chidamide suppressed growth, induced apoptosis and increased sensitivity to adriamycin in AML cells and stem/progenitor cells by inhibiting EZH2. We further demonstrated that in addition to decreasing the levels of H3K27me3 and DNMT3A, pharmacological or genetic inhibition of EZH2 decreased the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and increased adriamycin sensitivity in AML cells (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Model for the possible mechanism of chidamide-mediated chemosensitization in AML cells. Disruption of EZH2 by chidamide inhibited proliferation, induced apoptosis and increased the sensitivity to adriamycin through Smo/Gli-1 pathway in AML cells

Full size image

HDACs play an essential role in the development of leukemia, and combination of HDAC inhibitor with chemotherapeutic drug is a potentially effective approach against AML [45,46,47,48]. Our studies demonstrated that chidamide had antileukemia activity and sensitized AML cells to adriamycin. In an effort to understand the mechanism of action, we found that inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide or shEZH2 decreased the levels of H3K27me3 and DNMT3A and increased the cytotoxic activity of adriamycin, and EZH2 overexpression had the opposite effects on AML cells. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase associated with transcriptional repression through H3K27me2/3, and EZH2-mediated H3K27 methylation is closely related to pathological processes and poor prognosis in hematological malignancies [49, 50]. Inhibition of EZH2 suppresses the level of H3K27me3, induces leukemia cell apoptosis and depletes LSCs [41, 51]. EZH2 controls CpG methylation by directly contacting with DNMTs in PRC2/3 and is related to the activities of DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B [49, 52]. DNMT1- and EZH2-mediated methylation contributes to the progression of gastric cancer and glioblastoma [53]. Combined inhibition of EZH2 and DNA methylation produces a synergistic antileukemia effects through epigenetic regulation of multiple genes expression [54]. HDAC inhibitors decrease the expression of EZH2 and DNMT1 and increase hypomethylating agent-mediated apoptosis in human leukemia cells [55,56,57]. Knockdown of EZH2 expression inhibits histone methyltransferase activity, reduces H3K27me2/3 levels and increases the inhibition of clonogenic survival mediated by HDAC inhibitor in AML cells [58]. Combined inhibition of EZH2 and HDAC increases the depletion of PRC2 complex proteins and synergistically induces apoptosis in cultured and primary AML cells [59]. A first-in-class dual EZH2/HDAC inhibitor has been biologically investigated in AML cells, and its antileukemia activity is associated with proliferation inhibition, apoptosis induction and cell cycle arrest [60]. Therefore, targeted inhibition of EZH2 and HDACs has been developed as an epigenetic therapeutic strategy against AML.

In this study, we demonstrated that EZH2 inhibition by chidamide disrupted the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and downstream signaling molecule p-AKT and increased the adriamycin sensitivity of AML cells and stem/progenitor cells. Mechanistic studies showed that depletion of EZH2 by shRNA decreased the levels of H3K27me3 and DNMT3A and inhibited the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway, while disruption of Smo/Gli-1 pathway did not affect EZH2 expression. This result indicated that inhibition of EZH2 or Smo decreased the activity of Smo/Gli-1 pathway and contributed to the increasing sensitivity to adriamycin in AML cells. The Smo/Gli-1 pathway plays critical roles in embryogenesis and developmental processes, and its activity is essential for chemoresistance and maintenance of LSCs in myeloid leukemia [61,62,63]. Studies have shown that disruption of Smo/Gli-1 signaling increases chemosensitivity through downregulation of IGF-1R/Akt/MRP1 pathway and transcriptional control of twist1 and snail in AML cells [42, 64]. Smo inhibitors improve therapeutic efficacy by sensitizing dormant LSCs to chemotherapy and overcoming microenvironment-induced chemoresistance, and targeting Gli-1 also suppresses proliferation and enhances chemosensitivity in AML cells and progenitor cells [65,66,67]. Clinical studies have demonstrated that in combination chemotherapy, Smo inhibitor glasdegib benefits AML patients by increasing overall survival in the absence of complete remission (CR), suggesting that the antileukemia activity of glasdegib may be mediated through elimination of LSCs [68,69,70]. A recent study shows that the activity of Hedgehog pathway is largely independent of Smo and therefore inherently resistant to Smo inhibitors in AML, and hypomethylating agent improves glasdegib sensitivity by increasing the level of Gli-3 repressor and modulation of Gli-1 [71]. HDAC inhibitors abrogate Smo-dependent and Smo-independent GLI activation and Hedgehog-targeted gene expression and overcome drug resistance to Smo inhibitors in cancer cells [72, 73]. Combinatorial inhibition of HDACs and Hedgehog pathway synergistically suppresses tumor growth and homologous recombination in aerodigestive cancers, and a dual-targeted inhibitor is capable of effectively overcoming the Smo inhibitor resistance conferred by Smo mutations [74, 75]. Moreover, EZH2 inhibition results in multitarget-mediated suppression of Hedgehog pathway, increases chemosensitivity and decreases self-renewal in colorectal cancer-initiating cells [33, 40]. This finding supports the rational combination of HDAC inhibitor and chemotherapy for the treatment of AML.

Conclusions

In our study, disruption of EZH2 by chidamide was demonstrated to inhibit proliferation, induce apoptosis and improve sensitivity to adriamycin through disruption of Smo/Gli-1 pathway in AML cells. This study provides a promising strategy for the combination of HDAC inhibitors and cytotoxic drugs to improve chemotherapeutic effects in AML.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.

Abbreviations

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

LSC:

Leukemia stem cell

HAT:

Histone acetyltransferase

HDAC:

Histone deacetylase

EZH2:

Enhancer of zeste homolog 2

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

RT-PCR:

Real-time polymerase chain reaction

References

  1. Jiang XJ, Huang KK, Yang M, Qiao L, Wang Q, Ye JY, et al. Synergistic effect of panobinostat and bortezomib on chemoresistant acute myelogenous leukemia cells via AKT and NF-κB pathways. Cancer Lett. 2012;326(2):135–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.07.030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tallman MS, Gilliland DG, Rowe JM. Drug therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2015;106(4):1154–63. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-01-0178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McCubrey JA, Steelman LS, Franklin RA, Abrams SL, Chappell WH, Wong EW, et al. Targeting the RAF/MEK/ERK, PI3K/AKT and p53 pathways in hematopoietic drug resistance. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2007;47:64–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advenzreg.2006.12.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Panwalkar A, Verstovsek S, Giles F. Nuclear factor-KappaB modulation as a therapeutic approach in hematologic malignancies. Cancer. 2004;100(8):1578–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai SF, Levine RL. Genetic and epigenetic determinants of AML pathogenesis. Semin Hematol. 2019;56(2):84–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2018.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang X, Wang Z, Ding B, Yin C, Zhong Q, Carter BZ, et al. The hypomethylating agent decitabine prior to chemotherapy improves the therapy efficacy in refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia patients. Oncotarget. 2015;6(32):33612–22. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vishwakarma BA, Nguyen N, Makishima H, Hosono N, Gudmundsson KO, Negi V, et al. Runx1 repression by histone deacetylation is critical for Setbp1-induced mouse myeloid leukemia development. Leukemia. 2016;30(1):200–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wouters BJ, Delwel R. Epigenetics and approaches to targeted epigenetic therapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(1):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-07-604512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Catley L, Weisberg E, Kiziltepe T, Tai YT, Hideshima T, Neri P, et al. Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells. Blood. 2006;108(10):3441–9. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-04-016055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gregoretti IV, Lee YM, Goodson HV. Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family: Functional implications of phylogenetic analysis. J Mol Biol. 2004;338(1):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. West AC, Johnstone RW. New and emerging HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI69738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin-Perez D, Piris MA, Sanchez-Beato M. Polycomb proteins in hematological malignancies. Blood. 2010;116(25):5465–75. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-05-267096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ungerstedt JS. Epigenetic modifiers in myeloid malignancies: The Role of histone deacetylase inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. San José-Enériz E, Gimenez-Camino N, Agirre X, Prosper F. HDAC inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(11):1794. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11111794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Momparler RL, Côté S, Momparler LF, Idaghdour Y. Epigenetic therapy of acute myeloid leukemia using 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in combination with inhibitors of histone methylation and deacetylation. Clin Epigenetics. 2014;6(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1868-7083-6-19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong K, Xie J, Yi H, Li W. CS055 (Chidamide/HBI-8000), a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, induces G1 arrest, ROS-dependent apoptosis and differentiation in human leukaemia cells. Biochem J. 2012;443(3):735–46. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20111685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi Y, Jia B, Xu W, Li W, Liu T, Liu P, et al. Chidamide in relapsed or refractory peripheral T cell lymphoma: a multicenter real-world study in China. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-017-0439-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Guan W, Jing Y, Dou L, Wang M, Xiao Y, Yu L. Chidamide in combination with chemotherapy in refractory and relapsed T lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61(4):855–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1691195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Guan XW, Wang HQ, Ban WW, Chang Z, Chen HZ, Jia L, et al. Novel HDAC inhibitor chidamide synergizes with rituximab to inhibit diffuse large B-cell lymphoma tumour growth by upregulating CD20. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-2210-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu X, Wang L, Lin L, Han X, Dou G, Meng Z, et al. A phase I trial of an oral subtype-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor, chidamide, in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 2016;28(4):444–51. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao S, Guo J, Zhao Y, Fei C, Zheng Q, Li X, et al. Chidamide, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, inhibits the viability of MDS and AML cells by suppressing JAK2/STAT3 signaling. Am J Transl Res. 2016;8(7):3169–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Y, Chen K, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Deng M, Jiang Z, et al. A new strategy to target acute myeloid leukemia stem and progenitor cells using chidamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2015;15(6):493–503. https://doi.org/10.2174/156800961506150805153230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Li J, Chen K, Zhang L, et al. Cooperative effect of chidamide and chemotherapeutic drugs induce apoptosis by DNA damage accumulation and repair defects in acute myeloid leukemia stem and progenitor cells. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-017-0377-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang H, Wenbing Y, Dong A, He Z, Yao R, Guo W. Chidamide enhances the cytotoxicity of cytarabine and sorafenib in acute myeloid leukemia cells by modulating H3K9me3 and autophagy levels. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.01276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dedoni S, Marras L, Olianas MC, Ingianni A, Onali P. Downregulation of TrkB expression and signaling by valproic acid and other histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019;370(3):490–503. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.119.258129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi B, Behrens C, Vaghani V, Riquelme EM, Rodriguez-Canales J, Kadara H, et al. Oncogenic enhancer of zeste homolog 2 is an actionable target in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(14):6383–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stasik S, Middeke JM, Kramer M, Röllig C, Krämer A, Scholl S, et al. EZH2 mutations and impact on clinical outcome - an analysis in 1604 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2020;105(5):e228–31. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.222323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sauvageau M, Sauvageau G. Polycomb group proteins: multi-faceted regulators of somatic stem cells and cancer. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7(3):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sasaki D, Imaizumi Y, Hasegawa H, Osaka A, Tsukasaki K, Choi YL, et al. Overexpression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 with trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma as a target for epigenetic therapy. Haematologica. 2011;96(5):712–9. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2010.028605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bachmann IM, Halvorsen OJ, Collett K, Stefansson IM, Straume O, Haukaas SA, et al. EZH2 expression is associated with high proliferation rate and aggressive tumor subgroups in cutaneous melanoma and cancers of the endometrium, prostate, and breast. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(2):268–73. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.5180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tanaka S, Miyagi S, Sashida G, Chiba T, Yuan J, Mochizuki-Kashio M, et al. Ezh2 augments leukemogenicity by reinforcing differentiation blockage in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;120(5):1107–17. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-11-394932.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fujita S, Honma D, Adachi N, Araki K, Takamatsu E, Katsumoto T, et al. Dual inhibition of EZH1/2 breaks the quiescence of leukemia stem cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2018;32(4):855–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh AN, Sharma N. Epigenetic modulators as potential multi-targeted drugs against hedgehog pathway for treatment of cancer. Protein J. 2019;38(5):537–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10930-019-09832-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Terao T, Minami Y. Targeting Hedgehog (Hh) pathway for the acute myeloid leukemia treatment. Cells. 2009;8(4):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8040312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Irvine DA, Copland M. Targeting Hedgehog in hematologic malignancy. Blood. 2012;119(10):2196–204. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-10-383752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wellbrock J, Latuske E, Köhler J, Wagner K, Stamm H, Vettorazzi E, et al. Expression of Hedgehog pathway mediator GLI represents a negative prognostic marker in human acute myeloid leukemia and its inhibition exerts antileukemic effects. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(10):2388–98. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1059.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thomas X, Heiblig M. An evaluation of glasdegib for the treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia. Expert opin pharmacother. 2020;21(5):523–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2020.1713094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolska-Washer A, Robak T. Glasdegib in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncol. 2019;15(28):3219–32. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Savona MR, Pollyea DA, Stock W, Oehler VG, Schroeder MA, Lancet J, et al. Phase Ib study of glasdegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with AML or high-risk MDS. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(10):2294–303. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lima-Fernandes E, Murison A, da Silva Medina T, Wang Y, Ma A, Leung C, et al. Targeting bivalency de-represses Indian Hedgehog and inhibits self-renewal of colorectal cancer-initiating cells. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09309-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu Q, Zhang L, Li X, Chen F, Jiang L, Yu G, et al. Higher EZH2 expression is associated with extramedullary infiltration in acute myeloid leukemia. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):11409–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-4983-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Huang K, Sun Z, Ding B, Jiang X, Wang Z, Zhu Y, et al. Suppressing Hedgehog signaling reverses drug resistance of refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:7477–88. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S216628.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li X, Chen F, Zhu Q, Ding B, Zhong Q, Huang K, et al. Gli-1/PI3K/AKT/NF-kB pathway mediates resistance to radiation and is a target for reversion of responses in refractory acute myeloid leukemia cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):33004–15. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang X, Mak PY, Mu H, Tao W, Mak D, Kornblau S, et al. Disruption of Wnt/β-catenin exerts antileukemia activity and synergizes with FLT3 inhibition in FLT3-mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(10):2417–29. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jin J, Mao S, Li F, Li X, Huang X, Yu M, et al. A novel alkylating deacetylase inhibitor molecule EDO-S101 in combination with cytarabine synergistically enhances apoptosis of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Med Oncol. 2019;36(9):77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-019-1302-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tu HJ, Lin YJ, Chao MW, Sung TY, Wu YW, Chen YY, et al The anticancer effects of MPT0G211, a novel HDAC6 inhibitor, combined with chemotherapeutic agents in human acute leukemia cells. Clin Epigenetics. 2018;10(1):162. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0595-8.

  47. Lee TB, Moon YS, Choi CH. Histone H4 deacetylation down-regulates catalase gene expression in doxorubicin-resistant AML subline. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2012;28(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-011-9201-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yan B, Chen Q, Shimada K, Tang M, Li H, Gurumurthy A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitor targets CD123/CD47-positive cells and reverse chemoresistance phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2019;33(4):931–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0279-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Viré E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006;439(7078):871–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Romanchikova N, Trapencieris P. Wedelolactone Targets EZH2-mediated histone H3K27 methylation in mantle cell lymphoma. Anticancer Res. 2019;39(8):4179–84. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ueda K, Yoshimi A, Kagoya Y, Nishikawa S, Marquez VE, Nakagawa M, et al. Inhibition of histone methyltransferase EZH2 depletes leukemia stem cell of mixed lineage leukemia fusion leukemia through upregulation of p16. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(5):512–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ma L, Zhang X, Wang Z, Huang L, Meng F, Hu L, et al. Anti-cancer effects of curcumin on myelodysplastic syndrome through the inhibition of enhancer of zeste homolog-2 (EZH2). Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2019;19(9):729–41. https://doi.org/10.2174/1568009619666190212121735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ning X, Shi Z, Liu X, Zhang A, Han L, Jiang K, et al. DNMT1 and EZH2 mediated methylation silences the microRNA-200b/a/429 gene and promotes tumor progression. Cancer Lett. 2015;359(2):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Momparler RL, Idaghdour Y, Marquez VE, Momparler LF. Synergistic antileukemic action of a combination of inhibitors of DNA methylation and histone methylation. Leuk Res. 2012;36(8):1049–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2012.03.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu F, Guo H, Shi M, Liu S, Wei M, Sun K, et al. A combination of low-dose decitabine and chidamide resulted in synergistic effects on the proliferation and apoptosis of human myeloid leukemia cell lines. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(12):7644–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Mao J, Li S, Zhao H, Zhu Y, Hong M, Zhu H, et al. Effects of chidamide and its combination with decitabine on proliferation and apoptosis of leukemia cell lines. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(8):2567–78.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fiskus W, Buckley K, Rao R, Mandawat A, Yang Y, Joshi R, et al. Panobinostat treatment depletes EZH2 and DNMT1 levels and enhances decitabine mediated de-repression of JunB and loss of survival of human acute leukemia cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8(10):939–50. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.8.10.8213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Fiskus W, Pranpat M, Balasis M, Herger B, Rao R, Chinnaiyan A, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors deplete enhancer of zeste 2 and associated polycomb repressive complex 2 proteins in human acute leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5(12):3096–104. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fiskus W, Wang Y, Sreekumar A, Buckley KM, Shi H, Jillella A, et al. Combined epigenetic therapy with the histone methyltransferase EZH2 inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A and the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat against human AML cells. Blood. 2009;114(13):2733–43. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-03-213496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Romanelli A, Stazi G, Fioravanti R, Zwergel C, Di Bello E, Pomella S, et al. Design of First-in-Class Dual EZH2/HDAC Inhibitor: Biochemical Activity and Biological Evaluation in Cancer Cells. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2020;11(5):977–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Cortes JE, Gutzmer R, Kieran MW, Solomon JA. Hedgehog signaling inhibitors in solid and hematological cancers. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;76:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.04.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhao C, Chen A, Jamieson CH, Fereshteh M, Abrahamsson A, Blum J, et al. Hedgehog signalling is essential for maintenance of cancer stem cells in myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2009;458(7239):776–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Queiroz KC, Ruela-de-Sousa RR, Fuhler GM, Aberson HL, Ferreira CV, Peppelenbosch MP, et al. Hedgehog signaling maintains chemoresistance in myeloid leukemic cells. Oncogene. 2010;29(48):6314–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kong Y, Peng Y, Liu Y, Xin H, Zhan X, Tan W. Twist1 and Snail link Hedgehog signaling to tumor-initiating cell-like properties and acquired chemoresistance independently of ABC transporters. Stem Cells. 2015;33(4):1063–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1955.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fukushima N, Minami Y, Kakiuchi S, Kuwatsuka Y, Hayakawa F, Jamieson C, et al. Small-molecule hedgehog inhibitor attenuates the leukemia-initiation potential of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(10):1422–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.13019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Kobune M, Takimoto R, Murase K, Iyama S, Sato T, Kikuchi S, et al. Drug resistance is dramatically restored by hedgehog inhibitors in CD34+ leukemic cells. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(5):948–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01111.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Long B, Wang LX, Zheng FM, Lai SP, Xu DR, Hu Y, et al. Targeting GLI1 suppresses cell growth and enhances chemosensitivity in CD34+ enriched acute myeloid leukemia progenitor cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;38(4):1288–302. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lin S, Shaik N, Chan G, Cortes JE, Ruiz-Garcia A. An evaluation of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and the relationship with glasdegib treatment and exposure. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020;86(4):451–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-020-04132-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Cortes JE, Douglas Smith B, Wang ES, Merchant A, Oehler VG, Arellano M, et al. Glasdegib in combination with cytarabine and daunorubicin in patients with AML or high-risk MDS: Phase 2 study results. Am J Hematol. 2018;93(11):1301–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.25238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Cortes JE, Heidel FH, Fiedler W, Smith BD, Robak T, Montesinos P, et al. Survival outcomes and clinical benefit in patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated with glasdegib and low-dose cytarabine according to response to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00929-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chaudhry P, Singh M, Triche TJ, Guzman M, Merchant AA. GLI3 repressor determines Hedgehog pathway activation and is required for response to SMO antagonist glasdegib in AML. Blood. 2017;129(26):3465–75. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-05-718585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Gruber W, Peer E, Elmer DP, Sternberg C, Tesanovic S, Del Burgo P, et al. Targeting class I histone deacetylases by the novel small molecule inhibitor 4SC-202 blocks oncogenic hedgehog-GLI signaling and overcomes smoothened inhibitor resistance. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(5):968–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fan CW, Yarravarapu N, Shi H, Kulak O, Kim J, Chen C, et al. A synthetic combinatorial approach to disabling deviant Hedgehog signaling. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19408-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Chun SG, Park H, Pandita RK, Horikoshi N, Pandita TK, Schwartz DL, et al. Targeted inhibition of histone deacetylases and hedgehog signaling suppress tumor growth and homologous recombination in aerodigestive cancers. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5(4):1337–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Zhao J, Quan H, Xie C, Lou L. NL-103, a novel dual-targeted inhibitor of histone deacetylases and hedgehog pathway, effectively overcomes vismodegib resistance conferred by Smo mutations. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2014;2(3):e00043. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chipscreen biosiences (Shenzhen, China) for providing chidamide.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515012055); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570152); Clinical Research Startup Program of Southern Medical University by High-level University Construction Funding of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (LC2016YM005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China

    Xuejie Jiang, Ling Jiang, Jiaying Cheng, Fang Chen, Jinle Ni, Changxin Yin, Qiang Wang, Zhixiang Wang, Dan Fang, Zhengshan Yi, Guopan Yu & Fanyi Meng

  2. Department of Hematology, Kanghua Hospital, Dongguan, 523080, Guangdong, China

    Qingxiu Zhong & Fanyi Meng

  3. Section of Molecular Hematology and Therapy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Bing Z. Carter

Authors
  1. Xuejie Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ling Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiaying Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinle Ni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changxin Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhixiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dan Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhengshan Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Guopan Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Qingxiu Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Bing Z. Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Fanyi Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: XJ, FM; Development of methodology: XJ, LJ, JC, FC, CY, GY, ZY, YZ, FD, QZ; Acquisition of data: XJ, FC; Analysis and interpretation of data: XJ, FC, JC, LJ, QW, ZW, CY, FD, GY, FM; Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: XJ, BZC, FM; Administrative, technical, or material support: XJ, QW, ZW, ZY, GY, FM; Study supervision: XJ, FM. XJ, LJ, JC and FCs contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuejie Jiang or Fanyi Meng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the protocols were approved by the ethics committee at Nanfang Hospital, Guanghou China. Written consent for use of the samples for research was obtained from patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Fig. S1. Chidamide has limited cytotoxicity in normal CD45+ and CD34+ cells. Bone marrow samples from healthy donors were treated with chidamide for 48 hours. Apoptosis in CD45+ and CD34+ cells was determined by flow cytometry.

Additional file 2

: Fig. S2. Chidamide doesn’t sensitize normal CD45+ and CD34+cells to adriamycin. Bone marrow samples from healthy donors were treated with chidamide (1.00 μmol/L), adriamycin (0.13 μmol/L) or both for 48 hours. Apoptosis in CD45+ and CD34+ cells was determined by flow cytometry. Ctrl, control; Chi, chidamide; ADM, adriamycin; Comb, combination.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, X., Jiang, L., Cheng, J. et al. Inhibition of EZH2 by chidamide exerts antileukemia activity and increases chemosensitivity through Smo/Gli-1 pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. J Transl Med 19, 117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02789-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02789-3

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us