- Open Access
Identification and characterization of heteroclitic peptides in TCR-binding positions with improved HLA-binding efficacy
Journal of Translational Medicine volume 19, Article number: 89 (2021)
The antigenicity as well as the immunogenicity of tumor associated antigens (TAAs) may need to be potentiated in order to break the immunological tolerance. To this aim, heteroclitic peptides were designed introducing specific substitutions in the residue at position 4 (p4) binding to TCR. The effect of such modifications also on the affinity to the major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) molecule was assessed. The Trp2 antigen, specific for the mouse melanoma B16F10 cells, as well as the HPV-E7 antigen, specific for the TC1 tumor cell lines, were used as models. Affinity of such heteroclitic peptides to HLA was predicted by bioinformatics tools and the most promising ones were validated by structural conformational and HLA binding analyses. Overall, we demonstrated that TAAs modified at the TCR-binding p4 residue are predicted to have higher affinity to MHC-I molecules. Experimental evaluation confirms the stronger binding, suggesting that this strategy may be very effective for designing new vaccines with improved antigenic efficacy.
Tumor associated antigens (TAAs) are cellular self-antigens mostly overexpressed in cancer cells with low expression in normal cells. For this reason, they may be subject to both central and peripheral tolerance mechanisms leading to an inefficient immune response. Indeed, TAA-based cancer vaccines are well tolerated and have minimal side effects but have been proven to have limited efficacy in clinical trials . Recognition of target non self-antigens by T cells is mediated by interaction between the T cell receptor (TCR) and the peptide-MHC-I complex (pMHC). In such interaction, the peptide is fastened to the MHC-I groove through the amino acid residues at the “anchor positions” while exposing the complementary “TCR-binding” residues to the TCR. Deciphering the different MHC-I binding motifs enabled the definition of the preferred peptide residues at the anchor positions for each HLA allele [2,3,4,5]. Heteroclitic peptides have been designed to enhance the stability of the pMHC-I complex as well as to increase the immunogenicity of the bound peptide [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13].
An alternative approach for improving the immunogenicity of natural TAAs is to generate heteroclitic peptides mutated in the TCR-binding residues. The aim is to generate an epitope which is sufficiently different from the natural wild-type peptide presented by the cancer cells in order to break the immunological tolerance and induce a more potent CD8+ T cell response. However, such a difference should not be too extensive for the cellular immune response to retain the capability of cross-recognizing the natural structure and killing the presenting tumor cells [10, 11, 14,15,16,17,18,19]. Indeed, the low affinity between the TCR and the peptide-major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) allows the T-cell receptor to cross-react with multiple pMHCs [20,21,22].
In the present study, Trp2 and HPVE7 peptides, expressed by mouse melanoma B16F10 and TC1 tumor cell lines, respectively, were modified with different amino acid substitutions at the TCR-binding residue at position 4 (p4). Bioinformatics tools were used to predict and evaluate the impact of these amino acidic replacements on the antigen-MHC recognition. Moreover, experimental data demonstrated that even a mutation of a TCR-binding residue may increase the affinity for the MHC receptor. Based on these observations, we propose a rather simple strategy for developing vaccine antigens with improved antigenic efficacy.
Materials and methods
Prediction and design of heteroclitic peptides
Heteroclitic peptides for Trp2 and HPV E7 antigens were designed introducing each of the 20 genetically encoded amino acids at each position of the peptides. The predicted binding affinity of each heteroclitic peptide to the H2-Db was assessed by the NetMHCpan version 4.0 algorithm. Only mutations of the TCR-binding p4 residue (Tyr) predicted to have a higher affinity for the MHC compared to the wt peptide were selected for the experimental evaluation.
Individual peptides were synthesized at a purity > 95% determined by LC–MS analyses, as previously reported . Lyophilized powder was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich), diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (1 × PBS; Gibco Life Technologies) and stored at − 80 °C until use.
Peptide binding affinity assay
Peptide binding affinity to H2-Db molecule was performed for each selected peptide. Tap-deficient mouse derived H-2Db RMA-S cells were cultured for 24 h at 26 °C to accumulate empty MHC-I molecules on the cell surface . Cells were washed in serum-free medium and incubated at 3 × 105 cells/well with varying concentrations of peptides (1 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM) for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Cells were harvested, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (1 × PBS; Gibco Life Technologies), stained with anti-H-2Db fluorescent monoclonal antibody (cat. 1157535; SONY) and analyzed by flow cytometry. All the experiments were performed in triplicate.
Molecular docking of the E7 wt and Trp2 peptides and their heteroclitic variants with the H-2 class I histocompatibility antigen H-2Db
To perform molecular docking analysis of the complex between the major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) H-2Db and the HPV-16 E7, Trp2 peptides and their heteroclitic variants, the structural data available for H-2Db was searched in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (https://www.rcsb.org/). Although several structures of this murine MHC-I complexed with variety of peptides have been reported, no structural data is specifically available for the specific H-2Db/HPV-16-E7 as well as for H-2Db/Trp2 complexes. In this scenario, the PDB database was queried for complexes of H-2Db with peptides sharing some sequence similarity with HPV-16 E7 and Trp2 epitopes. A promising candidate was the PDB entry 1FG2 that corresponds to a complex of H-2Db with the LCMV peptide with sequence KAVYNFATC . The molecular modelling and docking analysis was performed by PyMOL and MolSoft molecular graphics systems.
Prediction and design of heteroclitic peptides
An overall 171 (9 × 19) variants of the wild type sequence of Trp2 and HPV E7 epitopes were generated by placing in each position of the peptides all 20 amino acids leaving in the other positions the original residue. Prediction binding to the H-2Db major histocompatibility complex I (MHC-I) was obtained for all the heteroclitic epitopes with the algorithm NetMHCpan 4.0. Most of them were predicted to have a binding to H-2Db lower than the wt sequence, while a set of 47 (Trp2) and 45 (E7) heteroclitic epitopes showed a binding higher than the wt (Fig. 1a, b).
Among the latter set of epitopes, those modified in the TCR-facing position 4 (p4) were selected for in vitro validation. Interestingly, the modification of the p4, which does not directly interact with the H-2Db molecule, had significant impact on the binding of the epitope. This was evident for both epitopes, but was more dramatic for the Trp2 which is a very poor binder in the wt form (6990 nM), and gained up to a 9.5-fold increase in the binding affinity to the H-2Db molecule (735 nM), although remaining a weak binder [17, 18] (Fig. 2a, b). In the HPV-E7 peptide, all the amino acid substitutions for the polar Tyrosine (Tyr, Y) were predicted to significantly improve the binding affinity to H2-Db molecule, regardless the chemical property of side chains. The best improvement was observed when the substitution involved either the non-polar Valine (Val, V) or the polar Glutamine (Gln, Q). The only exception was the non-polar Tryptophan (Trp, W) which did not induce a significant improvement in the binding affinity. Similar pattern was observed for the Trp2 peptide, and also in this case the best improvement was observed when the polar Glutamine (Gln, Q) substituted the negative charged Aspartic Acid (Asp, D) (Fig. 3).
The impact of the amino acid substitutions on the structure of the heteroclitic peptides as well as the interaction with the H2-Db molecule, was assessed by structure modelling and molecular docking. We preliminarily modelled the complexes formed by the E7 and Trp2 peptides with H-2Db using the structure of these MHCI with the peptide KAVYNFATC (PBD entry 1F2) as template. Interestingly, the E7 epitope shares with the peptide of the complex an Asn residue in position 5 (N5) that represents a key anchoring point of the epitope on the H2-Db molecule. On the contrary, the weak binder Trp2 peptide has a totally different conformational structure as the side chain of the residue in position 5 (F5) could not be easily allocated in the H2-Db pocket (Fig. 4a). The latter observation is confirmed by the lack of hydrogen bond formation between the F5 of Trp2 and the Q70/Q97 residues of H2-Db which are those interacting with the N5 of 1FG2 and E7 peptides (Fig. 4b).
In order to verify whether the substitutions of the residue in p4 do impact on the interactions with the H2-Db, molecular docking simulations were performed. The results show that none of the substitutions introduced in the p4 residue of the HPV-E7 peptide significantly changes the front as well as rear contact points of the E7 peptide with the H2-Db molecule. The only exception is the Y4Q substitution, which shows a loss of contact in the rear face at the p3/p4 tract (Fig. 5a). However, the amino acid pattern exposed to the TCR by each heteroclitic peptide, when docked into the H2-Db groove, shows significant differences compared to the wt. Indeed, only the Y4V substitution results in a conformation of the TCR binding residues very similar to the wt peptide (Fig. 5b).
Likewise, all the substitutions introduced in the heteroclitic peptides of the Trp2 epitope show an identical pattern of contact points with the H2-Db of the wt peptide (Fig. 6a). Accordingly, the amino acid pattern exposed to the TCR by each heteroclitic peptide, when docked into the H2-Db groove, shows a substantial similarity compared to the wt. Indeed, only the D4R and the D4W substitutions result in a conformation of the TCR binding residues significantly different from the wt peptide (Fig. 6b).
In vitro analysis of peptide binding affinity and stability to H-2 Db molecule
In order to experimentally confirm the binding of heteroclitic peptides to H-2 Db molecule, the H-2 Db positive RMA-S cell line was loaded with different concentrations (1 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM) of selected heteroclitic peptides modified in p4 with a predicted affinity higher than the wt peptide. The heteroclitic peptides of the E7 epitope, except for the Y4E substitution, showed a binding to the H-2Db stronger than the wt peptide, although the correlation with predicted binding was low. Indeed, the Y4W substitution, predicted to have a binding similar to the wt, showed the strongest binding in the assay (Fig. 7a, b). Similarly, most of the heteroclitic peptides of the Trp2 epitope showed a binding to the H-2Db stronger than the wt peptide, although the correlation with predicted binding was low. Also in this case, the substitutions D4W, D4C and D4E showed a binding lower than the wt although they were predicted to have a higher binding (Fig. 7c, d).
In the present study, we set up a simple strategy to design epitope variants with increased affinities for the H2-Db molecule. Heteroclitic peptides were designed with amino acid changes in one of the TCR-facing residues (p4) which does not have direct contacts with the H2-Db molecule. Such substitutions were predicted to impact on the peptide binding to the murine H2-Db molecule and, in particular, several of them induce an increased affinity. The two peptides used in the analysis, Trp2 and HPV-E7 peptides, are predicted to have dramatically different binding affinity to H2-Db molecule (6990 nM and 100 nM, respectively). Bioinformatics structural analyses confirm such a difference, showing that the structure of the residue in the anchor positions (p5) of the Trp2 peptide has a very poor compatibility with the H2-Db groove.
Molecular docking shows that, with the exception of the Y4Q, none of the other substitutions introduced in the p4 residue of the HPV-E7 peptide significantly changes the contact points of the E7 peptide with the H2-Db molecule. However, only the Y4V substitution, when docked into the H2-Db groove, results in a conformation of the TCR binding residues very similar to the wt peptide. Similarly, heteroclitic peptides of the Trp2 epitope show an identical pattern of contact points with the H2-Db of the wt peptide. Each heteroclitic peptide, when docked into the H2-Db groove, shows a substantial similarity compared to the wt, except for the D4R and the D4W substitutions.
The binding assay confirm that the heteroclitic peptides of the E7 epitope, except for the Y4E substitution, showed a binding to the H-2Db stronger than the wt peptide, although the correlation with predicted binding was rather low. Similarly, most of the heteroclitic peptides of the Trp2 epitope showed a binding to the H-2Db stronger than the wt peptide, although the correlation with predicted binding was low.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that modified heteroclitic TAAs can be improved by changing even one single side chain of the TCR-binding residues, achieving higher affinity to major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) molecule. Therefore, such a strategy may be very effective for designing vaccine antigens with superior antigenic efficacy.
In this respect, a validation experiment is currently planned in an animal model, to confirm the in silico analysis described in the present study. This will establish the foundation for moving forward the concept into a human clinical trial.
Availability of data and materials
Data and material are available upon request.
Zhao J, Chen Y, Ding ZY, Liu JY. Safety and efficacy of therapeutic cancer vaccines alone or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer treatment. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1184.
Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanovic S. SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics. 1999;50:213–9.
Rammensee HG, Friede T, Stevanoviic S. MHC ligands and peptide motifs: first listing. Immunogenetics. 1995;41:178–228.
Parker KC, Bednarek MA, Hull LK, Utz U, Cunningham B, Zweerink HJ, Biddison WE, Coligan JE. Sequence motifs important for peptide binding to the human MHC class I molecule, HLA-A2. J Immunol. 1992;149:3580–7.
Hunt DF, Henderson RA, Shabanowitz J, Sakaguchi K, Michel H, Sevilir N, Cox AL, Appella E, Engelhard VH. Characterization of peptides bound to the class I MHC molecule HLA-A2.1 by mass spectrometry. Science. 1992;255:1261–3.
Chen JL, Stewart-Jones G, Bossi G, Lissin NM, Wooldridge L, Choi EM, Held G, Dunbar PR, Esnouf RM, Sami M, et al. Structural and kinetic basis for heightened immunogenicity of T cell vaccines. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1243–55.
Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Schwartzentruber DJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM, Topalian SL, Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Schwarz SL, Spiess PJ, et al. Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat Med. 1998;4:321–7.
Houghton CS, Engelhorn ME, Liu C, Song D, Gregor P, Livingston PO, Orlandi F, Wolchok JD, McCracken J, Houghton AN, et al. Immunological validation of the EpitOptimizer program for streamlined design of heteroclitic epitopes. Vaccine. 2007;25:5330–42.
Petrizzo A, Caruso FP, Tagliamonte M, Tornesello ML, Ceccarelli M, Costa V, Aprile M, Esposito R, Ciliberto G, Buonaguro FM, et al. Identification and validation of HCC-specific gene transcriptional signature for tumor antigen discovery. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29258.
Dao T, Korontsvit T, Zakhaleva V, Jarvis C, Mondello P, Oh C, Scheinberg DA. An immunogenic WT1-derived peptide that induces T cell response in the context of HLA-A*02:01 and HLA-A*24:02 molecules. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1252895.
Bae J, Samur M, Munshi A, Hideshima T, Keskin D, Kimmelman A, Lee AH, Dranoff G, Anderson KC, Munshi NC. Heteroclitic XBP1 peptides evoke tumor-specific memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes against breast cancer, colon cancer, and pancreatic cancer cells. Oncoimmunology. 2014;3:e970914.
Madura F, Rizkallah PJ, Holland CJ, Fuller A, Bulek A, Godkin AJ, Schauenburg AJ, Cole DK, Sewell AK. Structural basis for ineffective T-cell responses to MHC anchor residue-improved “heteroclitic” peptides. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:584–91.
Dyson J. T-cell receptors: tugging on the anchor for a tighter hold on the tumor-associated peptide. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:380–2.
Carrabba MG, Castelli C, Maeurer MJ, Squarcina P, Cova A, Pilla L, Renkvist N, Parmiani G, Rivoltini L. Suboptimal activation of CD8(+) T cells by melanoma-derived altered peptide ligands: role of Melan-A/MART-1 optimized analogues. Cancer Res. 2003;63:1560–7.
Parkhurst MR, Salgaller ML, Southwood S, Robbins PF, Sette A, Rosenberg SA, Kawakami Y. Improved induction of melanoma-reactive CTL with peptides from the melanoma antigen gp100 modified at HLA-A*0201-binding residues. J Immunol. 1996;157:2539–48.
Chen JL, Dunbar PR, Gileadi U, Jager E, Gnjatic S, Nagata Y, Stockert E, Panicali DL, Chen YT, Knuth A, et al. Identification of NY-ESO-1 peptide analogues capable of improved stimulation of tumor-reactive CTL. J Immunol. 2000;165:948–55.
Circelli L, Petrizzo A, Tagliamonte M, Heidenreich R, Tornesello ML, Buonaguro FM, Buonaguro L. Immunological effects of a novel RNA-based adjuvant in liver cancer patients. Cancer ImmunolImmunother. 2017;66:103–12.
Binkowski TA, Marino SR, Joachimiak A. Predicting HLA class I non-permissive amino acid residues substitutions. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41710.
Moise L, Gutierrez AH, Bailey-Kellogg C, Terry F, Leng Q, Abdel Hady KM, VerBerkmoes NC, Sztein MB, Losikoff PT, Martin WD, et al. The two-faced T cell epitope: examining the host-microbe interface with JanusMatrix. Hum VaccinImmunother. 2013;9:1577–86.
Birnbaum ME, Mendoza JL, Sethi DK, Dong S, Glanville J, Dobbins J, Ozkan E, Davis MM, Wucherpfennig KW, Garcia KC. Deconstructing the peptide-MHC specificity of T cell recognition. Cell. 2014;157:1073–87.
Stone JD, Chervin AS, Kranz DM. T-cell receptor binding affinities and kinetics: impact on T-cell activity and specificity. Immunology. 2009;126:165–76.
Hawse WF, De S, Greenwood AI, Nicholson LK, Zajicek J, Kovrigin EL, Kranz DM, Garcia KC, Baker BM. TCR scanning of peptide/MHC through complementary matching of receptor and ligand molecular flexibility. J Immunol. 2014;192:2885–91.
Caporale A, Doti N, Sandomenico A, Ruvo M. Evaluation of combined use of Oxyma and HATU in aggregating peptide sequences. J Pept Sci. 2017;23:272–81.
van Stipdonk MJ, Badia-Martinez D, Sluijter M, Offringa R, van Hall T, Achour A. Design of agonistic altered peptides for the robust induction of CTL directed towards H-2Db in complex with the melanoma-associated epitope gp100. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7784–92.
Tissot AC, Ciatto C, Mittl PR, Grutter MG, Pluckthun A. Viral escape at the molecular level explained by quantitative T-cell receptor/peptide/MHC interactions and the crystal structure of a peptide/MHC complex. J Mol Biol. 2000;302:873–85.
RMA-S cells were kindly provided by Prof. Thorbald van Hall, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. CINECA Supercomputing (ISCRA C project code HP10CXCABH—E7HPV) is acknowledged for computational support.
The study was funded by the FP-7 HEPAVAC (Grant nr. 602893) (LB); Transcan2—HEPAMUT project (Grant nr. 643638) (LB); Italian Ministry of Health through Institutional “Ricerca Corrente” (LB); POR FESR 2014/2020 “Campania OncoTerapie” (LB, LV, MR). AM is funded by “Ricerca Corrente”. CM, BC; CR are funded by POR FESR 2014/2020 “NanoCAN”.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The corresponding author has received consent for publication.
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Cavalluzzo, B., Ragone, C., Mauriello, A. et al. Identification and characterization of heteroclitic peptides in TCR-binding positions with improved HLA-binding efficacy. J Transl Med 19, 89 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-02757-x