Skip to main content
Download PDF

An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 18, Article number: 83 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

An impedance threshold device (ITD) was developed to increase venous return to the heart and therefore increase cardiac output and organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary rescue (CPR). Basic CPR aims to maintain coronary and cerebral blood flow at the minimum level necessary for survival. The present study compared the effects of an ITD on cerebral blood flow assessed as blood flow in both carotid arteries to the blood flow of a control group during prolonged CPR.

Methods

Fourteen anaesthetized pigs were monitored during 60 min of CPR after induced ventricular fibrillation. The primary outcome was blood flow in both carotid arteries, and the secondary outcomes were blood pressure, acid–base parameters, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate. The pigs were randomized to mechanical compressions and ventilation with an ITD added to the ventilation or to a control group treated only with mechanical compressions and ventilation. The time course for the parameters was tested using analysis of variance.

Results

The cumulative carotid blood flow in the ITD group decreased from 64 to 42 ml/min, and it decreased from 69 to 51 ml/min in the control group during 60 min of CPR. The difference was not significant. The secondary outcome measures were also not significantly different.

Conclusions

This study did not show any beneficial effect of an ITD on carotid blood flow.

Background

It is often necessary to perform prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on patients with cardiac arrest (CA) during transportation to a hospital. Under these conditions, it is helpful to use mechanical chest compression devices, such as LUCAS and Autopulse [1, 2]. Blood flow is limited even during the best-performed manual CPR, but these devices improve organ perfusion. Some studies have indicated that blood flow may be even better if a device such as the LUCAS is combined with an impedance threshold device (ITD), as described in porcine models [3,4,5,6]. The ITD is a valve connected to a cuffed tracheal tube. The device limits air entry into the lungs during chest recoil between chest compressions. The effect is a decrease in intrathoracic pressure and an increase in venous return to the heart. The manufacturer of an ITD, ResQPod (Advanced Circulatory Systems, Roseville, MN, USA), has a homepage where one of the references demonstrated that an ITD increased blood flow to the brain by 50% in porcine models [5]. However, other animal studies did not show an effect of an ITD on coronary perfusion pressure [7, 8]. Clinical studies in patients have shown varying results. In a blinded, randomized study with ITD or sham ITD in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, there was no difference in survival to hospital discharge [9]. Another study showed a benefit of an ITD but only in cases where the quality of CPR was good, and the opposite result was found if the patient did not receive an acceptable quality of CPR [10]. According to the 2015 European Resuscitation Council guidelines [11] and the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines [12], an ITD is not recommended for routine use in CPR. However, it is of clinical interest to know if an ITD improves brain circulation during prolonged CPR when DC conversions and medications do not result in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Under these conditions, another method with extracorporeal life support may be a bridge to diagnosis, treatment and survival provided that the circulation to the brain was sufficient until ECC was established [13, 14].

The present porcine study examined the effects of an ITD on the cumulated blood flow in the internal carotid arteries during CPR. Other studies used only one carotid artery with a similar purpose [4, 15].

Methods

The Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate approved the experiment (no. 2016-15-0201-00866), which was performed in accordance with the Utstein-style guidelines for reporting laboratory cardiopulmonary resuscitation [16].

Study design: Randomized controlled experimental animal study. The statistician performing the analysis was blinded to the randomization.

Animal care

Fourteen female Danish Landrace pigs were used for this study. The animals were allowed 1 week of acclimation after arrival to the research facility. They were housed in pairs, with free access to water and feed.

The pigs were pre-anaesthetised with an intramuscular injection of a Zoletil (Virbac, Kolding, Denmark) mixture containing two dissociative medications (ketamine 8.3 mg/ml and tiletamine 8.3 mg/ml), a benzodiazepine (zolazepam 8.3 mg/ml), an opioid (butorphanol 1.7 mg/ml), and xylazine (8.3 mg/ml). Anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of propofol and fentanyl until ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced, when all medications were withdrawn. A single dose of 2.500 IU heparin was given to inhibit blood clots in the vascular catheters. No vasopressors or other medications were used during the 1-h study period.

The animals were paralyzed with 50 mg of rocuronium prior to VF induction to inhibit a confounding effect of gasping [17].

The trachea was intubated with a 6.5-mm endotracheal tube, and the lungs were mechanically ventilated with a ventilator (Dameca Dream, Roedovre, Denmark). The tidal volume (TV) was 10 ml/kg, and the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 5 cm H2O. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) was 0.6 during the surgical procedures. The TV was higher than recommended in guidelines for humans, but it is the normal TV range for pigs [18, 19]. The respiratory rate (RR) was adjusted to keep the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) at 4.5–5.5 kPa with an unaltered TV because a change in TV could influence the effect of an ITD.

A central 7 Fr venous catheter was inserted via the right jugular vein to the level of the right atrium for drug and fluid administration and VF induction. A 6 Fr femoral catheter was inserted into the right femoral artery for continuous blood pressure monitoring and blood tests.

Electrocardiography (ECG), bladder temperature, end tidal CO2 (ETCO2), and blood pressure (BP) were monitored continuously using a Propac MD monitor (Zoll, Medidyne, Copenhagen, Denmark).

One litre of saline was infused during instrumentation to rehydrate the animals after fasting prior to the experiments.

A bladder catheter with a temperature gauge (Degania Silicone Ltd. Degania Bet 15130, Israel) was inserted for urine drainage and temperature monitoring.

The animal’s temperature was kept at a level of normothermia using a warming blanket, if needed.

Both internal carotid arteries were exposed, and a perivascular ultrasound transit time flow probe of 4 mm (Medi-Stim ASA, Fernanda Nissensgate 3, Oslo, Norway) was fitted on the arteries to measure blood flow. The combined flow in the two arteries was considered a reflection of the blood flow to the brain.

The animals were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital at the end of the study period.

Experimental procedures

Before initiating VF, FiO2 was reduced to 0.23, which is the lowest possible set point for the ventilator, and induction of VF was not performed if PaO2 was above 15 kPa.

VF was induced with a pacemaker wire inserted via the central venous catheter into the right ventricle using a 9-V DC shock. CA was defined as VF and systolic BP below 25 mmHg according to the Utstein guidelines [16]. Just after induction of VF, the ventilator was adjusted to a FiO2 of 1.0, and RR was set to 10/min with unaltered tidal volume but with no PEEP. Mechanical cardiac compressions were started immediately using LUCAS1™ at 100 compressions/min, a compression:decompression relationship of 1:1 and a compression depth of 5 cm [1]. The animals were placed in a homemade pig holder for the LUCAS device (LUCAS 1, Jolife AB, Ideon Science Park, SE-223 70 Lund, Sweden) to keep the pigs securely positioned and slightly turned to the right side, which in our experience results in fewer injuries to the pig during cardiac compressions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Photo of the homemade pig holder showing the animal slightly turned to the right side to avoid injuries from the Lucas1 Cardiac Compression Device

Full size image

On each of the seven study days, 2 pigs were randomized to one of the 2 groups immediately after VF. Thus, seven pigs were randomized to each group.

ITD group

Ventilation was continued using the ventilator with the same settings as described for the control group, but an ITD (ResQPod, Advanced Circulatory Systems, Roseville, MN, USA) was connected to the tube as an interface between the animal and the ventilator to inhibit air flow into the trachea during the decompression phase.

Control group

Ventilation was continued using the ventilator with an unchanged TV of 10 ml/kg and an RR of 10/min; PEEP was reduced to zero, and FiO2 was increased to 1.0.

Cardiac compressions for both groups were started immediately following VF induction using the LUCAS1 device at a frequency of 100/min and were continued for 60 min.

Exclusion criteria

The Utstein recommendations for animal experiments of resuscitation define circulatory arrest as a systolic BP below 25 mmHg [16]. However, since our primary outcome was carotid blood flow during 60 min of mechanical CPR, data were included even if BP decreased below 25 mmHg. The experiment was terminated if an animal had ROSC.

Experimental outcomes

The primary outcome measure was the change in blood flow in both carotid arteries after 60 min compared to the flow 5 min after the induction of cardiac arrest. The secondary outcome measures were systolic BP, pH, PaO2, ETCO2, plasma potassium and plasma lactate.

Measurements

The following values were measured just prior to VF induction (i.e., precardiac arrest): total blood flow in both carotid arteries (carotid BF), systolic femoral blood pressure (BP), and ETCO2. Blood gas analysis was performed using an ABL 800 Radiometer (Copenhagen, Denmark). pH, PaO2, potassium and lactate concentration values are presented in the results.

Bladder temperature was continuously measured, and the temperature was kept in the normal range using warming blankets.

All measurements were performed every 5 min after VF induction during the period of investigation up to 1 h. Cardiac compressions were paused for 5 s during each measurement to evaluate ROSC.

Statistics

Distributions are described as the means and standard deviations (SDs). Comparisons of baseline distributions between treatment groups were performed using an unpaired t-test.

To describe the time course in the two groups, spline curves were fitted to the time series data of outcome variables by means of repeated measures one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The levels of outcome variables at time t = 5 and t = 60 were estimated from these splines. In all analyses, bootstrapping with 10.000 replications was used for calculations of standard errors, and p-values were used to account for potential violations of assumed normality and correlation structure in the data.

A value of p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Stata Version 15 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) was used for all calculations and graphs.

Results

Pre-CA values are indicated in Table 1. The ITD group had a significantly higher flow in the carotid arteries (446 ml/min) vs. the control group (280 ml/min). There was also a very small but significant difference in pH, which was 7.47 in the ITD group and 7.43 in the control group. Both baseline pH values were in the normal range for pigs. There was no flow or pH difference at the first measurements at CA + 5 min, as indicated in Table 2, but there was a significantly higher p-lactate in the control group after 5 min of CA. This difference disappeared after 60 min of CA. Table 3 shows the measured values at the end of the study after 60 min of CA. These exact values at the end of the study are of interest, but the smooth ANOVA spline curves over time are even better to show the time course, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3.

Table 1 Pre-cardiac arrest values for carotid blood flow, systolic blood pressure, pH, PaO2, ETCO2, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate
Full size table
Table 2 First measured values after 5 min of cardiac arrest for carotid blood flow, systolic blood pressure, pH, PaO2, ETCO2, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate
Full size table
Table 3 Last measured values after 60 min of cardiac arrest for carotid blood flow, systolic blood pressure, pH, PaO2, ETCO2, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure2

Graph showing smooth ANOVA spline curves and 95% Bayesian confidence lines for carotid blood flow for animals in the control group and in the ITD from time + 5 min to 60 min following cardiac arrest

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Graphs showing smooth ANOVA spline curves and 95% Bayesian confidence lines for blood pressure, pH, PaO2, ETCO2, and P-potassium for animals in the control group and in the ITD group from time + 5 min to 60 min following cardiac arrest

Full size image

All seven animals in the ITD group and all seven animals in the control group were included in all 60 min of CA.

Two animals in the ITD group experienced a drop in BP below 25 mmHg, one animal after 35 min and the other animal after 55 min, but as mentioned, the measurements continued for all seven animals for the 60 min of CA.

Cumulative flow in the internal carotid arteries

The measured mean values between the induction of CA + 5 min and at the end after 60 min are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The cumulative blood flow in the carotid arteries decreased during the study period from 64.3 to 41.9 ml/min in the ITD group, as estimated from the spline curves (Fig. 2), compared to 68.6 to 50.6 ml/min in the control group. There was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.99).

Blood pressure

Systolic BP in the group treated with ITD decreased from 71.2 to 60.4 mmHg. Systolic BP in the control group decreased from 63.5 to 55.5 mmHg. There was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.98).

Partial pressure of oxygen

The decrease in PaO2 in the ITD group was from 56.3 to 11.9 kPa, and in the control group, the decrease was from 55.1 to 9.7 kPa. There was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.99).

ETCO2

ETCO2 in the ITD group decreased from 3.4 to 3.0 kPa. ETCO2 in the ITD group decreased from 3.1 to 2.4 kPa. There was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.98).

P-potassium

P-potassium in the ITD group increased from 4.9 to 6.7 mmol/l, and the increase in the control group was from 5.3 to 6.9 mmol/l. There was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.21).

pH

The pH decreased from 7.48 to 7.20 in the ITD group, and in the control group, the pH decreased from 7.47 to 7.16. The minimal difference in baseline pH disappeared, and there was no significant difference between the groups after 5 min of CA or after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.58).

P-lactate

P-lactate increased from 1.60 to 7.87 in the ITD group, and in the control group, p-lactate increased from 2.50 to 9.84. There was a significantly lower p-lactate level in the ITD group after 5 min of CA, but the difference was not significant after 60 min of CA (Tables 2 and 3). The shape of the time course during the study period did not differ between the treatment groups (p = 0.17).

Discussion

The present study did not show any superior effects on cerebral blood flow or acid–base parameters in a group of pigs with CA treated with an ITD compared to a control group during 1 h of CPR. The differences in the baseline measurements of cerebral blood flow could not be explained by anything other than coincidence, and even though the differences appeared to be in favour of the ITD group, there was no difference during the whole period of CA.

Reports on the use of an impedance threshold device are conflicting. More animal studies have indicated beneficial effects on haemodynamic parameters, such as increased coronary perfusion pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure [3,4,5,6], and one of these showed improved 24- and 48-h survival and neurological outcomes [6]. Other studies did not indicate any positive effects on haemodynamic parameters [7, 8]. The present study could not evaluate any possible beneficial effect on the haemodynamics during a shorter duration of CPR, which could influence the possibility of ROSC after DC conversion. In clinical practice, DC is often tried as early as possible. The relatively stable EtCO2 in both groups during 60 min of CPR indicates that the quality of CPR was good.

It was not possible to measure blood flow in the vertebral arteries, which also supply the cerebrum with blood, but we assumed that the blood flow in the carotid arteries reflected the total cerebral blood flow. This assumption is consistent with a previous study that measured blood flow to the brain by measuring cerebral blood flow using an injection of radioactively labelled microspheres and a peripheral flow probe placed on the right common carotid artery [4]. The researchers demonstrated an equivalent decrease in cerebral blood flow using both methods. Debaty et al. [3] demonstrated no increase in cerebral blood flow using a flow probe on the left carotid artery. In contrast, Lurie et al. [5] demonstrated a 20% increase in cerebral blood flow (from 0.19 to 0.23 ml/g/min) during CPR combined with ITD, also using a technique involving the injection of radiolabelled microspheres.

The conflicting results support the need for more research, especially because medical equipment is not subjected to the same regulations as new medical drugs, which need approval by government authorities, such as the US Food and Drug Administration, European Commission or other national authorities.

Strengths

The design of the present study allowed for the creation of a prolonged and controlled cardiac arrest period to test our hypothesis that an ITD would increase blood flow to the brain during the study period of 1 h. It was possible to measure blood flow continuously in both carotid arteries. The statistician was blinded to the study results.

Limitations

The major limitation is the transition from animal to human studies due to the species differences between humans and pigs. The LUCAS device is for human use, but it was originally designed for studies in pigs. The present study did not evaluate the effect of ITD on haemodynamics, such as central venous return or coronary perfusion pressure.

The entire study group was not blinded.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study did not show any beneficial effects of an ITD on the cumulative carotid blood flow or acid–base parameters in pigs with VF treated with CPR for 1 h.

Availability of data

The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BP:

Blood pressure

CA:

Cardiac arrest

CPR:

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ECG:

Electrography

EtCO2 :

End tidal carbon dioxide

FiO2 :

Inspired fraction of oxygen

ITD:

Impedance threshold device

TV:

Tidal volume

VF:

Ventricular fibrillation

References

  1. 1.

    Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Ostlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311(1):53–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wik L, Olsen JA, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M, Brouwer MA, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation. 2014;85(6):741–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Debaty G, Segal N, Matsuura T, Fahey B, Wayne M, Mahoney B, et al. Hemodynamic improvement of a LUCAS 2 automated device by addition of an impedance threshold device in a pig model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014;85(12):1704–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Langhelle A, Stromme T, Sunde K, Wik L, Nicolaysen G, Steen PA. Inspiratory impedance threshold valve during CPR. Resuscitation. 2002;52(1):39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lurie KG, Mulligan KA, McKnite S, Detloff B, Lindstrom P, Lindner KH. Optimizing standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an inspiratory impedance threshold valve. Chest. 1998;113(4):1084–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pantazopoulos IN, Xanthos TT, Vlachos I, Troupis G, Kotsiomitis E, Johnson E, et al. Use of the impedance threshold device improves survival rate and neurological outcome in a swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest*. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(3):861–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mader TJ, Kellogg AR, Smith J, Hynds-Decoteau R, Gaudet C, Caron J, et al. A blinded, randomized controlled evaluation of an impedance threshold device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in swine. Resuscitation. 2008;77(3):387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Menegazzi JJ, Salcido DD, Menegazzi MT, Rittenberger JC, Suffoletto BP, Logue ES, et al. Effects of an impedance threshold device on hemodynamics and restoration of spontaneous circulation in prolonged porcine ventricular fibrillation. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007;11(2):179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Aufderheide TP, Frascone RJ, Wayne MA, Mahoney BD, Swor RA, Domeier RM, et al. Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial. Lancet (London, England). 2011;377(9762):301–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yannopoulos D, Aufderheide TP, Abella BS, Duval S, Frascone RJ, Goodloe JM, et al. Quality of CPR: an important effect modifier in cardiac arrest clinical outcomes and intervention effectiveness trials. Resuscitation. 2015;94:106–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Soar J, Nolan JP, Bottiger BW, Perkins GD, Lott C, Carli P, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 3. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2015;95:100–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brooks SC, Anderson ML, Bruder E, Daya MR, Gaffney A, Otto CW, et al. Part 6: alternative techniques and ancillary devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 2015 American heart association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132(18 Suppl 2):S436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kjaergaard B, Frost A, Rasmussen BS, Kruger K, Ravkilde J. Extra corporeal life support makes advanced radiologic examinations and cardiac interventions possible in patients with cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2011;82(5):623–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kjaergaard B, Kristensen JH, Sindby JE, de Neergaard S, Rasmussen BS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in life-threatening massive pulmonary embolism. Perfusion. 2019;34(6):467–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Aagaard R, Granfeldt A, Botker MT, Mygind-Klausen T, Kirkegaard H, Lofgren B. The right ventricle is dilated during resuscitation from cardiac arrest caused by hypovolemia: a porcine ultrasound study. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(9):e963–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Idris AH, Becker LB, Ornato JP, Hedges JR, Bircher NG, Chandra NC, et al. Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research. A statement for healthcare professionals from a Task Force of the American Heart Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Cardiology, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Institute of Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Resuscitation. 1996;33(1):69–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Noc M, Weil MH, Sun S, Tang W, Bisera J. Spontaneous gasping during cardiopulmonary resuscitation without mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;150(3):861–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    De Robertis E, Liu JM, Blomquist S, Dahm PL, Thorne J, Jonson B. Elastic properties of the lung and the chest wall in young and adult healthy pigs. Eur Respir J. 2001;17(4):703–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Iglesias JM, Lopez-Herce J, Urbano J, Solana MJ, Mencia S, Del Castillo J. Chest compressions versus ventilation plus chest compressions in a pediatric asphyxial cardiac arrest animal model. Intens Care Med. 2010;36(4):712–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of the Biomedical Research Laboratory in Aalborg for their support.

Funding

We received no external funding for the performance of this experiment.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, 9100, Aalborg, Denmark

    Benedict Kjaergaard

  2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Benedict Kjaergaard, Hans O. Holdgaard, Sigridur O. Magnusdottir, Søren Lundbye-Christensen & Erika F. Christensen

  3. Biomedical Research Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

    Benedict Kjaergaard & Sigridur O. Magnusdottir

  4. Center for Prehospital and Emergency Research, Aalborg University and Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

    Hans O. Holdgaard & Erika F. Christensen

  5. Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

    Søren Lundbye-Christensen

  6. Clinic of Medicine and Emergency Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

    Erika F. Christensen

Authors
  1. Benedict Kjaergaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans O. Holdgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sigridur O. Magnusdottir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Søren Lundbye-Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erika F. Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BK, HOH, and SOM performed the animal experiments. SLC performed the statistical analyses, and EFC helped with the conception, supervision, and critical review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedict Kjaergaard.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiments were approved by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate (no 2016-15-0201-00866).

Consent for publication

The authors agree on publication of the results of the present manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kjaergaard, B., Holdgaard, H.O., Magnusdottir, S.O. et al. An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest. J Transl Med 18, 83 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02264-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Impedance threshold device
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Carotid blood flow

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us