Skip to main content
Download PDF

Time-of-day at symptom onset was not associated with infarct size and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 17, Article number: 180 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) displays circadian variability with the highest incidence in the morning hours. Data on whether the time-of-day at symptom onset affects infarct size or patients’ long-term prognosis are conflicting. We sought to investigate the association of time-of-day at symptom onset with infarct size or long-term mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

Methods

This study included 1206 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. All patients underwent single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with 99mTc-sestamibi before and 7–14 days after PPCI. The co-primary endpoints were final infarct size on day 10 after STEMI and all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Time-of-day at symptom onset of STEMI was categorized in 6-h intervals.

Results

In patients presenting from 0 to 6 h, 6 to 12 h, 12 to 18 h, and 18 to 24 h, the infarct sizes (median [25th–75th percentiles]) were 10.0 [3.0–24.7], 10.0 [3.0–24.0], 10.0 [3.0–22.0], and 9.0 [3.0–21.0] of the left ventricle, respectively (p = 0.87); the Kaplan–Meier estimates of 5-year all-cause mortality were 13.6%, 8.7%, 13.7% and 9.3%, respectively (log-rank test p = 0.30). After adjustment, time-of-day was not associated with infarct size (p ≥ 0.76 for comparisons with infarct size from reference [6–12 h] time interval) or 5-year all-cause mortality (p ≥ 0.25 for comparisons with mortality from reference [6–12 h] time interval). Time-of-day at symptom onset of STEMI was not associated with differences in the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction 6 months after STEMI.

Conclusions

In patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, time-of-day at symptom onset was neither associated with scintigraphic infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction recovery at 6 months nor with 5-year mortality.

Background

The biological circadian clock, comprising a central (suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus) and peripheral (autonomous networks in peripheral tissues) clock, orchestrates circadian rhythms which are crucial for maintaining cardiovascular physiology. Blood pressure, heart rate, autonomic nervous system activity, release of glucocorticoids, and catecholamines display cyclic variations [1, 2]. Cardiovascular events also show a time-of-day dependence [3,4,5]. Epidemiological studies have shown that myocardial infarction (MI), angina, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death show daily rhythmicity with a first peak of events in the morning (6–12 h), a second in the evening (18–22 h), and a trough during night (0–6 h) [2]. Furthermore, some studies have suggested an association between time-of-day at symptom onset and the course of disease [6,7,8,9,10,11]. These studies were motivated by findings that cardiomyocytes exhibit an internal circadian clock and may consequently respond differently to injury at certain times of a day [12, 13].

Preclinical studies revealed that the time-of-day at onset of cardiac ischemia may influence post-MI healing. Experimental studies in mice with permanent coronary ligation showed that circadian oscillations of neutrophil recruitment may affect infarct size, myocardial healing, and cardiac function [14]. Similarly, in ischemia/reperfusion injury studies, the largest infarct size was detected when mice were injured at sleep–wake-transition [15]. Clinical studies investigating the association of time-of-day onset of ischemia with infarct size revealed conflicting results. While some studies reported that infarct size differed according to the time of MI onset [6,7,8,9,10, 16,17,18,19], others failed to detect a clear circadian dependence of infarct size after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [20]. Obviously, the timing of reperfusion therapy will also affect infarct size which will thus depend on the availability of qualified personnel during night hours.

Data on the clinical relevance of the time-of-day onset of STEMI in terms of prognosis are sparse. In this study, we sought to investigate the association of time-of-day at symptom onset in STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in a tertiary care center with: (1) documented time intervals from symptom onset to hospital admission, (2) scintigraphic infarct size measured with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging using 99mTc-sestamibi; and (3) 5-year clinical outcome after PPCI.

Methods

Study design

The study details and characteristics of source sample have been described before [21, 22]. Briefly, between January 2002 and December 2007, 1406 patients with STEMI underwent PPCI and paired scintigraphic studies at two tertiary care centers (Deutsches Herzzentrum München and Klinikum rechts der Isar, both Technical University of Munich). The diagnosis of STEMI was based on chest pain lasting ≥ 20 min and persistent ST-segment elevation ≥ 1 mm in at least two extremity or ≥ 2 mm in at least two precordial electrocardiographic leads or new onset of left bundle branch block. The diagnosis of STEMI was confirmed with coronary angiography in all patients. 200 out of 1406 STEMI patients were excluded because the time-of-day at symptom onset was not clearly documented. Consequently, 1206 STEMI patients with scintigraphic data on infarct size were included in this study. By design, the study represents a retrospective analysis. All patients gave written informed consent for the procedures. The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Angiography and PPCI

All procedures were carried out at two tertiary care centers (Deutsches Herzzentrum München and Klinikum rechts der Isar, both Technical University of Munich), with 24 h/7 days PPCI service. The time-of-day at symptom onset as well as the time of hospital admission were routinely recorded in the hospital charts. Coronary angiography, PPCI and periprocedural care were performed as per standard care [21, 22]. The culprit lesion in infarct-related artery was defined in the presence of acute occlusion, intraluminal filling defects (or thrombus), ulcerated plaques with contrast-filled pocket protruding into plaque with or without delayed contrast wash-out, extraluminal contrast, dissection or intraluminal flaps. Coronary artery disease in non-culprit lesions was defined as coronary stenosis of ≥ 50% lumen obstruction. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) was measured on left ventricular (LV) angiograms using the area-length method. Unfractionated heparin was used for periprocedural anticoagulation. The antithrombotic regime included clopidogrel, a loading dose of 600 mg, and aspirin 325 to 500 mg. Chronic antithrombotic therapy consisted of clopidogrel, 150 mg until discharge (no more than 3 days) followed by 75 mg/day for ≥ 1 month (mostly) and aspirin 200 mg/day indefinitely.

Measurement of myocardial area at risk and final infarct size by SPECT

99mTc-sestamibi single-photon computed tomography (SPECT) imaging was performed as described previously [21, 22]. Briefly, SPECT imaging was performed serially in each patient at two time points:

  1. 1.

    99mTc-sestamibi (27 mCi (1000 MBq)) was intravenously injected before PPCI and imaging was carried out 6 to 8 h after injection. Here, perfusion defect was assessed and represents the myocardial area at risk.

  2. 2.

    99mTc-sestamibi was again intravenously injected 7 to 14 days after PPCI and imaging was performed 6–8 h thereafter. Here, perfusion defect was determined and represents the final infarct size.

Perfusion defects were defined as < 50% uptake of 99mTc-sestamibi and were expressed as percentage of the left ventricle. Myocardial salvage index was calculated as initial myocardial areal at risk minus final infarct size divided by initial myocardial area at risk. The myocardial salvage index shows the proportion of initial myocardial area at risk salvaged by reperfusion. All measurements were carried out by investigators unaware of clinical or angiographic data.

Creatine kinase myocardial band (CKMB) was measured daily and peak level was defined as the highest in-hospital value. CKMB was used as an enzymatic estimate of infarct size.

Study outcomes and follow-up

Infarct size in the second scintigraphy and 5-year all-cause mortality were the co-primary endpoints of the study. Cardiovascular mortality, salvage index, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)—composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization—were also analyzed. As a standard practice in our institution at the time of patient recruitment, all patients were scheduled to undergo coronary angiography 6 months after the procedure or whenever they showed symptoms or signs of myocardial ischemia and the angiograms were used to calculate 6-month LV-EF. Nonfatal myocardial infarction was diagnosed based on development of new abnormal Q waves in ≥ 2 contiguous precordial or ≥ 2 adjacent extremity leads, or an elevation of CKMB > 2 times (> 3 times for 48 h after a PCI procedure) the upper limit of normal in the presence of ischemia symptoms. Cardiac deaths were defined according to the Academic Research Consortium criteria [23]. Target vessel revascularization was defined as any repeat PCI or bypass surgery of the target vessel over the follow-up. Follow-up information was obtained by staff members unaware of the clinical data including time-of-day at symptom onset via phone calls 30 days after PCI, 1 year after PCI, and yearly thereafter. Data on mortality were obtained from hospital records, death certificates, or phone contact with patients’ relatives or referring physicians.

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median with 25th–75th percentiles depending on normality of distribution and compared with one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test, as appropriate. Discrete variables were presented as proportions (percentages) and compared with Chi square test. The association between time-of-day at symptom onset and infarct size (co-primary endpoint) was tested using the multiple linear regression model (with infarct size as continues variable) or multivariable logistic regression model (with infarct size dichotomized at median value). All variables of Table 1 with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were included in the model. Long-term clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The association between time of symptom-onset (categorized at 0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h, and 18–24 h time intervals) and all-cause (or cardiac) mortality (co-primary endpoint) was tested using the Cox proportional hazards models and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for 0–6 h, 12–18 h or 18–24 h time intervals vs. 6–12 h time interval which served as reference. All parameters of Additional file 1: Table S1 (for all-cause mortality) and Additional file 1: Table S2 (for cardiac mortality) with a p-value < 0.05 (univariable correlates of all-cause or cardiac mortality) plus infarct size were entered into the model(s). Assuming a HR of 2.0 and a type I error rate of 5%, we calculated a power of 91% using the sample size of n = 1206 patients. IBM SPSS Statistics version 24 and GraphPad Prism 7 (version 7.0a) were used for statistical analysis and visualization of data. Circadian variation in area at risk, final infarct size, and myocardial salvage was assessed using the ‘cosinor’ package in R (Version 3.4.3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Table 1 Baseline and procedural characteristics according to time-of-day at symptom onset
Full size table

Results

Baseline data

This study included 1206 STEMI patients. The day was divided into four time intervals: 0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h and 18–24 h as described previously [16, 20]. Overall 273 patients (22.6%) had a symptom onset at 0–6 h time interval, 355 patients (29.4%) at 6–12 h time interval, 309 patients (25.6%) at 12–18 h time interval and 269 patients (22.3%) at 18–24 h time interval. Baseline characteristics of patients according to time-of-day at symptom onset are shown in Table 1. The baseline variables did not differ in between the groups according to the time-of-day at symptom onset with the exception of frequency of hypercholesterolemia, infarct localization, time-to-admission interval, door-to-balloon time interval, and presentation during office hours.

Time-of-day at symptom onset and final infarct size

Scintigraphic data are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 1. None of scintigraphic parameters differed according to the time-of-day at symptom onset. The infarct size (co-primary endpoint) was 10.0 [3.0–24.7], 10.0 [3.0–24.0], 10.0 [3.0–22.0] and 9.0 [3.0–21.0] of the left ventricle in patients with symptom onset at 0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h, and 18–24 h, respectively. (p = 0.87). In STEMI patients presenting with symptom onset between 0–6 h, 6–12 h, 12–18 h, and 18–24 h, peak CKMB values were: 128 [69–238] U/L, 119 [60–255], 155 [59–265] U/L and 136 [53–260] U/L (p = 0.78, Fig. 1). After adjustment in the multiple linear regression model (see “Methods” for variables entered into the model), time-of-day was not independently associated with infarct size (coefficient = − 0.14; p = 0.67). In a separate analysis, patients were dichotomized into groups based on the median value of initial area at risk, infarct size and salvage index, which were 23.9% of the left ventricle for area at risk, 10.0% for infarct size and 0.5 for salvage index. The association of time-of-day with values ≤ or > median of all these parameters is shown in Table 3. As seen unadjusted or adjusted odds ratios (obtained from multiple logistic regression model) did not show an association between time-of-day (intervals, 0–6 h, 12–18 h and 18–24 h) vs. 6–12 h time interval (reference interval). Of note, an analysis including only individuals presenting within 3 h after symptom onset did also not reveal different results (Additional file 1: Table S3). Moreover, circadian oscillations in blood leukocyte numbers which are normally present in healthy individuals [24, 25] were abrogated after STEMI (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Table 2 Initial area at risk, infarct size and salvage index according to the time-of-day at symptom onset
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Time-of-day at symptom onset and estimates of myocardial damage. a Initial area at risk. b Infarct size in the 7 to-14-day scintigraphy. c Salvage index—the proportion of initial area at risk salvaged by reperfusion. d Creatine kinase myocardial band (CKMB). For each parameter, the left panel shows the distribution of data whereas the right panel shows median values with 25th–75th percentiles. LV left ventricle

Full size image
Table 3 Association of time-of-day at symptom onset with area at risk > median, final infarct size > median or salvage index > median
Full size table

Time-of-day at symptom onset and recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction

LV-EF data 6-month follow-up were available in 470 patients (39%): 120 patients with a time of symptom onset at 0–6 h, 138 patients with a time of symptom onset at 6–12 h, 103 patients with a time of symptom onset at 12–18 h and 109 patients with a time of symptom onset at 18–24 h. In these groups, the LV-EF values at 6 months follow-up (median with 25th–75th percentiles) were: 60 [49–68]%, 60 [51–68]%, 61 [50–68]%, and 58 [47–67]%, respectively (p = 0.59; Fig. 2a). LV-EF data at baseline and 6-month follow-up were available in 447 patients: 113 patients with a time of symptom onset at 0–6 h, 134 patients with a time of symptom onset at 6–12 h, 101 patients with a time of symptom onset at 12–18 h and 99 patients with a time of symptom onset at 18–24 h. In all 4 groups, LV-EF was improved at 6 months compared with baseline values (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Time-of-day at symptom onset and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF). a LV-EF at 6 months. b Improvement of LV-EF compared with baseline values. Data are median with 25th–75th percentiles. Numbers: 0–6 h, n = 120; 6–12 h, n = 138; 12–18 h, n = 103; 18–24 h, n = 109

Full size image

Time-of-day at symptom onset and long-term clinical outcomes

The median follow-up for all-cause death was 1341 days and a complete 5-year follow-up was available in 441 (37%) patients. Overall there were 104 deaths during the follow-up: 28 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 0–6 h, 24 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 6–12 h, 31 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 12–18 h and 21 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 18–24 h (Kaplan–Meier estimates of mortality, 13.6%, 8.7%, 13.7% and 9.3%, respectively [log-rank test p-value = 0.30]). Cardiac deaths occurred in 68 patients: 19 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 0–6 h, 12 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 6–12 h, 22 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 12–18 h and 15 deaths in patients with a time-of-day at symptom onset at 18–24 h (Kaplan–Meier estimates of mortality, 9.0%, 4.3%, 9.7% and 6.4%, respectively [log-rank test p-value = 0.13]). Kaplan–Meier curves of all-cause and cardiac mortality are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier survival curves free from all-cause (a) and cardiac mortality (b) CD, cardiac death

Full size image

There was no association between time-of-day at symptom onset and the frequency of other clinical outcomes including nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization or MACE (Table 4). After adjustment in the Cox proportional hazards model (see “Methods” for variables entered into the model) there was no association between time-of-day at symptom onset and 5-year all-cause or cardiac mortality. Unadjusted and adjusted hazards ratios for mortality in 0–6 h, 12–18 h and 18–24 h time intervals versus 6–12 h time interval (reference) are shown in Table 5. Of note, an analysis including only individuals presenting within 3 h after symptom onset did also not reveal different results (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Table 4 Clinical outcome at 5-year follow-up
Full size table
Table 5 Association of time-of-day at symptom onset with long-term clinical outcome (results obtained from the univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model)
Full size table

Discussion

The main findings of this study may be summarized as follows: (1) Time-of-day at symptom onset in patients with STEMI was not associated with initial area at risk, infarct size or amount of myocardium salvaged by PPCI. (2) Time-of-day at the symptom onset was not associated with the 5-year risk of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization or MACE. (3) Time-of-day at the symptom onset was not associated with differences in the recovery of LV-EF at 6 months after PPCI.

Most organisms display intrinsic body clocks that respond to external cues and control major functions during steady state and pathologies [1, 5, 26,27,28,29]. Photic cues (light/dark pattern) are received by the retina, then signal via the retinohypothalamic tract and are processed in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nuclei which represents the central/master clock of the body [26]. This activates the (i) hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, which triggers release of adrenocorticotropic hormone from the cortex of the pituitary gland and (ii) the sympathetic–adrenal–medullary axis which stimulates of the adrenal medulla to produce the catecholamines. Additionally, the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) directly innervates peripheral end organs and regulates circadian rhythms locally by releasing the neurotransmitter noradrenaline. Apart from the cardiovascular system, the immune system also displays circadian variations. Blood leukocytes, for instance, are known to oscillate in terms of numbers and phenotypes during the course of a day [14, 30, 31]. In humans, monocyte and neutrophil numbers peak at around 22 h (light-to-dark transition) and show a trough at around 8 h (dark to light transition) [24, 25].

In our study, most STEMI cases occurred between 6 and 12 h. This is in line with previous findings on MI occurrence [3, 32, 33] and may be explained by the fact that plaque rupture/erosion leading to coronary occlusion is more likely during morning hours due to increased hemodynamic stress (surge in heart rate and blood pressure), thrombotic activity, i.e., platelet aggregability, and recruitment of inflammatory leukocyte from blood to plaque during this time-of-day [34,35,36]. Regarding leukocyte recruitment, it was recently shown in mice that the sympathetic activity increases during the active phase which raises levels of endothelial cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, P-, and E-selectin) facilitating leukocyte recruitment to peripheral tissues (bone marrow and cremaster muscle) [36, 37]. The increased leukocyte homing and extravasation contributes to the observed lower levels of circulating blood leukocytes. Inversely, SNS activity is low during the resting phase which maintains basal levels of endothelial cell adhesion molecules to support low levels of leukocyte recruitment. This results in higher numbers of blood leukocytes during the resting phase and might offer an explanation why plaque rupture is highest during morning hours (more recruitment of inflammatory blood leukocytes to the plaque). However, in our STEMI patients blood leukocyte levels did not exhibit circadian oscillations, but were rather equally distributed throughout the day. One may speculate that MI, a strong (sympathetic) stimulus, overrides moderate circadian variations in healthy humans which are known to rely on oscillating sympathetic activity [36, 37]. Moreover, mice unlike humans are nocturnal animals and hence are active during the dark phase. Thus, findings regarding circadian rhythms in nocturnal mice may not be so simply extrapolated to diurnal rhythms in humans.

We found no association between the time-of-day at symptom onset of STEMI and scintigraphic indices such as initial area at risk, infarct size or amount of myocardium salvaged by PPCI. In this regard our findings concur with a recent study by Ammirati et al. [20]. which found no clear-cut circadian dependence of infarct size after STEMI. Other studies, however, reported larger infarct sizes for the tie-of-day at symptom onset between 6 and 12 h [6,7,8,9,10, 16, 17]. These studies used either peak CK (creatine kinase), peak troponin I or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to determine the infarct size. The strength of our study rests on the serial use of SPECT imaging which represents a reliable and validated tool for the estimation of infarct size in clinical setting [38]. Moreover, paired SPECT imaging allowed us to assess other important parameters like initial myocardial area at risk and the amount of myocardium salvaged by PPCI and correlate them with the time-of-day at symptom onset. Likewise, we found no association between time-of-day at symptom onset and infarct size assessed by peak CKMB.

In the current study, we did not find a higher probability of LV function recovery for individuals with time-of-symptom onset between 6 and 12 h as compared to those between 18 and 24 h indicating that time-of-day symptom onset may not affect LV-remodeling. While human data are scarce, preclinical studies showed a circadian influence on cardiac remodeling. Similar to circadian variations in leukocyte recruitment to peripheral tissues (see above), recruitment of blood leukocytes to the infarcted heart also seems to be facilitated when injury occurs during the active phase. It was recently shown that neutrophils carry more of the chemokine receptor CXCR2 and the heart expresses more cell adhesion molecules and chemokines during the active phase of the day [14]. Consequently, exaggerated accumulation of leukocytes from the blood to the heart during the active phase may result in adverse cardiac remodeling. Similar to permanent ligation studies, ischemia/reperfusion performed at the sleep-to-wake transition also resulted in adverse cardiac remodeling in comparison to ischemia/reperfusion performed at the wake-to-sleep transition [15]. Another recent study investigated the effect of a disrupted dark–light pattern in mice on adverse cardiac remodeling after MI [39]. The authors found that diurnal rhythm disruption immediately post-MI impaired healing and exacerbated maladaptive cardiac remodeling. These effects were mainly caused by an altered innate immune response leading to an exaggerated accumulation of cardiac macrophages in the group with disrupted rhythm. However, our human data do not support these preclinical findings. Although the reasons for this discrepancy are not clear it may be speculated that (i) larger patient cohorts are needed to unmask a circadian effect, (ii) most mouse studies used permanent ligation while all our patients had spontaneously occurring STEMI and underwent revascularization, and (iii) that findings from nocturnal mice may not be directly translated to diurnal humans.

Finally, we did not find a significant association between the time-of-day at symptom onset and clinical outcome. We speculate that this may be a direct consequence of our findings which showed no association between circadian rhythms infarct size or amount of myocardium salvaged after PPCI or LV function at 6 months after STEMI. Although the statistical significance was not achieved, patients with symptom onset at 6–12 h showed the lowest rates of crude all-cause and cardiac mortality. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first analysis of an association between time-of-day symptom onset and 5-year outcome in patients with STEMI. All other studies have analyzed short-term in-hospital, 30-day or 1-year mortality [6,7,8,9,10,11].

Our study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective analysis of patients presenting with STEMI treated with PPCI in tertiary care centers between 2002 and 2007 and not a dedicated trial designed to investigate the association of time-of-day at symptom onset with infarct size or clinical outcome of patients with STEMI. Time-of-day at symptom onset was documented in all individuals included in this study as standard routine care using a specific questionnaire. However, patient-reported time of symptom onset is subjective and may represent an inaccurate measure of true time of STEMI onset. In that light, it was recently reported that the biochemical onset of STEMI (Troponin T release) may occur even earlier than the patient-reported onset time [40]. Moreover, pre-infarction angina may also have occurred and contributed further to an imprecise determination of STEMI onset. Obviously, type and timing of reperfusion therapy might have affected the outcome of our study. Time-to-admission intervals differed significantly. However, adjustment for time-to-admission intervals did not impact the investigated outcomes. Third, the angiographic follow-up measurements of LV-EF were available in only 39% (n = 470) and 5-year follow-up only in 37% of the patients (n = 451). Furthermore, STEMI patients were enrolled between 2002 and 2007 and may hence with respect to stent technology and anti-platelet therapy not be the most contemporary STEMI cohort. Last, we did not have access to cardiovascular medication (or adherence) during the follow-up which might have had an impact on clinical outcome. Although undesirable, we do not believe that these limitations impact on the main findings of the study.

Conclusions

In STEMI patients treated with PPCI, time-of-day at symptom onset was not associated with differences in final infarct size, amount of myocardium salvaged by PPCI or recovery of LV function or long-term (5-year) all-cause or cardiac mortality.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its additional information files.

Abbreviations

BMI:

body mass index

CABG:

coronary artery bypass graft

CD:

cardiac death

CK:

creatine kinase

CKMB:

creatine kinase myocardial band

GFR:

glomerular filtration rate

LAD:

left anterior descending artery

LCX:

left circumflex artery

LM:

left mainstem

LV:

left ventricular

LV-EF:

left ventricular ejection fraction

MACE:

major adverse cardiovascular events

MI:

myocardial infarction

PPCI:

primary percutaneous coronary intervention

RCA:

right coronary artery

SPECT:

single photon emission computed tomography

SNS:

sympathetic nervous system

STEMI:

ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

References

  1. McAlpine CS, Swirski FK. Circadian influence on metabolism and inflammation in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2016;119:131–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheer FAJL, Hu K, Evoniuk H, Kelly EE, Malhotra A, Hilton MF, Shea SA. Impact of the human circadian system, exercise, and their interaction on cardiovascular function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:20541–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006749107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller JE, Stone PH, Turi ZG, Rutherford JD, Czeisler CA, Parker C, Poole WK, Passamani E, Roberts R, Robertson T. Circadian variation in the frequency of onset of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1985;313:1315–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198511213132103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Paschos GK, FitzGerald GA. Circadian clocks and vascular function. Circ Res. 2010;106:833–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.211706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Martino TA, Sole MJ. Molecular time: an often overlooked dimension to cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2009;105:1047–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.206201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suárez-Barrientos A, López-Romero P, Vivas D, Castro-Ferreira F, Núñez-Gil I, Franco E, Ruiz-Mateos B, García-Rubira JC, Fernández-Ortiz A, Macaya C, Ibanez B. Circadian variations of infarct size in acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2011;97:970–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2010.212621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fournier S, Eeckhout E, Mangiacapra F, Trana C, Lauriers N, Beggah AT, Monney P, Cook S, Bardy D, Vogt P, Muller O. Circadian variations of ischemic burden among patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2012;163:208–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Seneviratna A, Lim GH, Devi A, Carvalho LP, Chua T, Koh T-H, Tan H-C, Foo D, Tong K-L, Ong H-Y, Richards AM, Yew CK, Chan MY. Circadian dependence of infarct size and acute heart failure in ST elevation myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0128526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wieringa WG, Lexis CPH, Mahmoud KD, Ottervanger JP, Burgerhof JGM, Pundziute G, van’t Hof AWJ, van Gilst WH, Lipsic E. Time of symptom onset and value of myocardial blush and infarct size on prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Chronobiol Int. 2014;31:797–806. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.908897.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmoud KD, Nijsten MW, Wieringa WG, Ottervanger JP, Holmes DR, Hillege HL, van’t Hof AW, Lipsic E. Independent association between symptom onset time and infarct size in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32:468–77. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.992527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes DR, Aguirre FV, Aplin R, Lennon RJ, Nestler DM, Bell MR, Rihal CS, Ting HH. Circadian rhythms in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3:382–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.913343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Durgan DJ, Young ME. The cardiomyocyte circadian clock: emerging roles in health and disease. Circ Res. 2010;106:647–58. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Montaigne D, Marechal X, Modine T, Coisne A, Mouton S, Fayad G, Ninni S, Klein C, Ortmans S, Seunes C, Potelle C, Berthier A, Gheeraert C, Piveteau C, Deprez R, Eeckhoute J, Duez H, Lacroix D, Deprez B, Jegou B, Koussa M, Edme J-L, Lefebvre P, Staels B. Daytime variation of perioperative myocardial injury in cardiac surgery and its prevention by Rev-Erbα antagonism: a single-centre propensity-matched cohort study and a randomised study. Lancet. 2018;391:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32132-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schloss MJ, Horckmans M, Nitz K, Duchene J, Drechsler M, Bidzhekov K, Scheiermann C, Weber C, Soehnlein O, Steffens S. The time-of-day of myocardial infarction onset affects healing through oscillations in cardiac neutrophil recruitment. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8:937–48. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201506083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Durgan DJ, Pulinilkunnil T, Villegas-Montoya C, Garvey ME, Frangogiannis NG, Michael LH, Chow CW, Dyck JRB, Young ME. Short communication: ischemia/reperfusion tolerance is time-of-day-dependent: mediation by the cardiomyocyte circadian clock. Circ Res. 2010;106:546–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.209346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter R, Swingen C, Moore L, Henry TD, Traverse JH. Circadian dependence of infarct size and left ventricular function after ST elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2012;110:105–10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.254284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arroyo Úcar E, Dominguez-Rodriguez A, Abreu-Gonzalez P. Influence of diurnal variation in the size of acute myocardial infarction. Med Intensiva. 2012;36:11–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2011.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulluck H, Nicholas J, Crimi G, White SK, Ludman AJ, Pica S, Raineri C, Cabrera-Fuentes HA, Yellon D, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Garcia-Dorado D, Hausenloy DJ. Circadian variation in acute myocardial infarct size assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused STEMI patients. Int J Cardiol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fournier S, Taffé P, Radovanovic D, Von Elm E, Morawiec B, Stauffer J-C, Erne P, Beggah A, Monney P, Pascale P, Iglesias J-F, Eeckhout E, Muller O. Myocardial infarct size and mortality depend on the time of day-a large multicenter study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ammirati E, Cristell N, Cianflone D, Vermi A-C, Marenzi G, De Metrio M, Uren NG, Hu D, Ravasi T, Maseri A, Cannistraci CV. Questing for circadian dependence in ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: a multicentric and multiethnic study. Circ Res. 2013;112:e110–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Fusaro M, Keta D, Seyfarth M, Byrne RA, Pache J, Alger P, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAC. 2010;55:2383–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ndrepepa G, Alger P, Fusaro M, Kufner S, Seyfarth M, Keta D, Mehilli J, Schömig A, Kastrati A. Impact of perfusion restoration at epicardial and tissue levels on markers of myocardial necrosis and clinical outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:128–35. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7I1A21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es G-A, Steg PG, Morel M-A, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky AJ, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW, Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Dallas: American Heart Association Inc; 2007. p. 2344–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haus E, Smolensky MH. Biologic rhythms in the immune system. Chronobiol Int. 2009;16:581–622. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420529908998730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Born J, Lange T, Hansen K, Mölle M, Fehm HL. Effects of sleep and circadian rhythm on human circulating immune cells. J Immunol. 1997;158:4454–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheiermann C, Kunisaki Y, Frenette PS. Circadian control of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:190–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Laake LW, Lüscher TF, Young ME. The circadian clock in cardiovascular regulation and disease: lessons from the Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine 2017. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2326–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Klinkenberg LJJ, van Dijk J-W, Tan FES, van Loon LJC, van Dieijen-Visser MP, Meex SJR. Circulating cardiac troponin T exhibits a diurnal rhythm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1788–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Winter C, Silvestre-Roig C, Ortega-Gomez A, Lemnitzer P, Poelman H, Schumski A, Winter J, Drechsler M, de Jong R, Immler R, Sperandio M, Hristov M, Zeller T, Nicolaes GAF, Weber C, Viola JR, Hidalgo A, Scheiermann C, Soehnlein O. Chrono-pharmacological targeting of the CCL2-CCR29 axis ameliorates atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 2018;28:175–. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen KD, Fentress SJ, Qiu Y, Yun K, Cox JS, Chawla A. Circadian gene bmal1 regulates diurnal oscillations of Ly6Chi inflammatory monocytes. Science. 2013;341:1483–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schloss MJ, Hilby M, Nitz K, Guillamat Prats R, Ferraro B, Leoni G, Soehnlein O, Kessler T, He W, Luckow B, Horckmans M, Weber C, Duchene J, Steffens S. Ly6Chigh monocytes oscillate in the heart during homeostasis and after myocardial infarction-brief report. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37:1640–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mogabgab O, Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Foody JM, Wang TY, Sabatine MS, Cannon CP, Li S, Giugliano RP. Relation between time of symptom onset of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and patient baseline characteristics: from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36:222–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.12101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakashima H, Mashimo Y, Kurobe M, Muto S, Furudono S, Maemura K. Impact of morning onset on the incidence of recurrent acute coronary syndrome and progression of coronary atherosclerosis in acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2017;81:361–7. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0817.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan X, Hussain MM. Diurnal regulation of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and plasma lipid levels. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24707–19. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M701305200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Adamovich Y, Rousso-Noori L, Zwighaft Z, Neufeld-Cohen A, Golik M, Kraut-Cohen J, Wang M, Han X, Asher G. Circadian clocks and feeding time regulate the oscillations and levels of hepatic triglycerides. Cell Metab. 2014;19:319–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.12.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Scheiermann C, Kunisaki Y, Lucas D, Chow A, Jang J-E, Zhang D, Hashimoto D, Merad M, Frenette PS. Adrenergic nerves govern circadian leukocyte recruitment to tissues. Immunity. 2012;37:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sager HB, Nahrendorf M. Inflammation: a trigger for acute coronary syndrome. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;60:185–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gibbons RJ, Valeti US, Araoz PA, Jaffe AS. The quantification of infarct size. JAC. 2004;44:1533–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Alibhai FJ, Tsimakouridze EV, Chinnappareddy N, Wright DC, Billia F, O’Sullivan ML, Pyle WG, Sole MJ, Martino TA. Short-term disruption of diurnal rhythms after murine myocardial infarction adversely affects long-term myocardial structure and function. Circ Res. 2014;114:1713–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahmoud KD, Hillege HL, Jaffe AS, Lennon RJ, Holmes DR. Biochemical validation of patient-reported symptom onset time in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:778–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

T.K. and H.B.S. were supported by a “Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung” rotation grant for medical doctors. T.K. is supported by the Corona Foundation (Junior Research Group Translational Cardiovascular Genomics). H.B.S. is supported by the European Research Council (STRATO 759272), the Else-Kröner-Forschungskolleg, Technische Universität München, and the Deutsche Herzstiftung (F/28/17). This study was further supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the Sonderforschungsbereich CRC 1123 (B02, to T.K. and H.S.), the grant DFG SA 1668/5-1 (to H.B.S.), and the grant DFG STE1053/5-1 (to S.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany

    Hendrik B. Sager, Oliver Husser, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati, Gjin Ndrepepa & Thorsten Kessler

  2. Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK) e.V, Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany

    Hendrik B. Sager, Sabine Steffens, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Heribert Schunkert, Adnan Kastrati & Thorsten Kessler

  3. Klinik für Innere Medizin I, Kardiologie, St. Johannes-Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

    Oliver Husser

  4. Institut für Prophylaxe und Epidemiologie der Kreislaufkrankheiten, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Sabine Steffens

  5. I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz

Authors
  1. Hendrik B. Sager
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oliver Husser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sabine Steffens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heribert Schunkert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Adnan Kastrati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gjin Ndrepepa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thorsten Kessler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HBS and TK generated the hypothesis. HBS, OH, AK, GN, and TK analyzed the data. HBS, SS, KLL, HS, AK, GN, and TK interpreted the patient data. OH, SS, KLL, HS, AK, and GN provided comments/edits and contributed to writing the manuscript. HBS and TK wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hendrik B. Sager or Thorsten Kessler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

By design, the study represents a retrospective analysis. All patients gave written informed consent for the procedures. The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Univariate correlates of 5-year all-cause mortality. Table S2. Univariate correlates of 5-year cardiovascular mortality. Table S3. Association of time-of-day at symptom onset with area at risk, final infarct size or salvage index in individuals presenting within three hours after symptom onset. Table S4. Association of time-of-day at symptom onset with long-term clinical outcome (results obtained from the univariable Cox proportional hazards model) in individuals presenting within three hours after symptom-onset. Figure S1. Total blood leukocyte counts on admission in relation to time-of-day at symptom onset.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sager, H.B., Husser, O., Steffens, S. et al. Time-of-day at symptom onset was not associated with infarct size and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Transl Med 17, 180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1934-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-019-1934-z

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us