Skip to main content

Molecular purging of multiple myeloma cells by ex-vivo culture and retroviral transduction of mobilized-blood CD34+ cells



Tumor cell contamination of the apheresis in multiple myeloma is likely to affect disease-free and overall survival after autografting.


To purge myeloma aphereses from tumor contaminants with a novel culture-based purging method.


We cultured myeloma-positive CD34+ PB samples in conditions that retained multipotency of hematopoietic stem cells, but were unfavourable to survival of plasma cells. Moreover, we exploited the resistance of myeloma plasma cells to retroviral transduction by targeting the hematopoietic CD34+ cell population with a retroviral vector carrying a selectable marker (the truncated form of the human receptor for nerve growth factor, ΔNGFR). We performed therefore a further myeloma purging step by selecting the transduced cells at the end of the culture.


Overall recovery of CD34+ cells after culture was 128.5%; ΔNGFR transduction rate was 28.8% for CD34+ cells and 0% for CD138-selected primary myeloma cells, respectively. Recovery of CD34+ cells after ΔNGFR selection was 22.3%. By patient-specific Ig-gene rearrangements, we assessed a decrease of 0.7–1.4 logs in tumor load after the CD34+ cell selection, and up to 2.3 logs after culture and ΔNGFR selection.


We conclude that ex-vivo culture and retroviral-mediated transduction of myeloma leukaphereses provide an efficient tumor cell purging.


The standard therapy for multiple myeloma is high-dose chemotherapy with autologous reinfusion of hematopoietic stem cells [13]. Molecular evidences indicate that residual cancer cells contaminate the transplant, and several reports estimate a tumor burden of 104 – 109 plasma cells per transplant [4, 5]. Although their role in determining patients' overall survival is still unclear, a correlation has been shown between a plasma cell contamination >2 × 105/lt and an early relapse [6, 7]. In an effort to overcome this problem, a purging approach of aphereses was developed with a positive selection of CD34+ cells, but no significant clinical advantage was achieved with this method [8]. Recent studies show that 75% of aphereses are still contaminated with plasma cells after the CD34+ selection [9]. Other purging approaches exploited a more restricted phenotypic selection to eliminate tumor contaminants, such as CD34+/lin-/Thy1+ [10, 11], or combined selections (CD34+/CD19-) [12]. For both methods, preliminary clinical results indicate good purging achievements, but high infection rates, and poor bone marrow reconstitution results, due to the effects of progenitor- and T-cells depletion [11]. Barbui et al. described a purging approach based on negative selection of mobilized blood stem cells [13], in which they achieve safe engraftment results with purged cell grafts, but without advantages in the overall survival of patients. A wide variability of purging results – ranging from 0 to 7 logs depletions – is achieved by these phenotype-based purging methods. Still no clinical trial so far established a defined threshold of purging necessary to reduce the risk of relapse while maintaining a safe clinical feasibility.

We investigated the efficiency of a culture-based purging of myeloma aphereses.

Myeloma plasma cells exhibit a high mortality in culture (50–95% in 9 days) [14]; we exploited this biological behaviour to perform a culture-based purging of myeloma CD34-selected leukaphereses. We designed a 4-day cytokine-culture procedure, adequate for a safe maintenance of the CD34+ cell multilineage phenotype, but unfavourable to plasma cells. Moreover myeloma cells display a very low retroviral-mediated transduction rate, even after repeated infection cycles (1.5–5.4%) [14, 15], therefore we structured the protocol to allow the insertion and the expression of retroviral genes in the CD34+ cells. Through this approach, we directed the selectable marker ΔNGFR to the CD34+ cell population, adding a further purging possibility. ΔNGFR has already been utilized in T cell populations to control GvHD in allogeneic bone marrow transplants [16, 17]. To assess the effectiveness of purging, we amplified patient-specific, clonal tumor immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) rearrangements before and after CD34+ cell culture procedure and retroviral transduction.

We present here the results of culture and transduction of primary cells from leukaphereses of 19 multiple myeloma (MM) patients, undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood cell autografting.


Cell processing

Mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) and bone marrow (BM) cells were collected from MM patients enrolled in high-dose chemotherapy programs, approved by IRB at HSR, after informed consent. Mononuclear cells were purified by density centrifugation using the lymphocyte separation medium Lymphoprep (Nycomed Pharma, Asker, Norway).

CD34+ cells were positively selected using the following immunomagnetic separation devices: mini-, and midi-MACS (CD34+ MultiSort Kit, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), cliniMACS (Miltenyi Biotec), ISOLEX300i (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. CD138+ cells were selected with mini-MACS device, using direct conjugated anti CD138 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Immunoselected cells were analyzed by flow-cytometry, to determine the purity of selections.

Retroviral supernatant production

BML-1 Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus (MoMLV) based retrovirus, containing the ΔNGFR marker gene under the control of LTR promoter [18] was collected from producer cells, kindly provided by Roche Diagnostics GmbH. Producer cells were expanded in 200 μl/cm2 Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM, Bio Whittaker, Verviers, Belgium) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FCS, Euroclone, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, UK), 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine at 5 × 104 cells/cm2, at 37°C with 5% CO2. The medium was replaced after 48 hours, 72 hours and 84 hours reducing the volume to 66 μl/cm2 and the temperature to 33°C [19]. Viral supernatant (SN) was collected with 12-hours serial collections, 0.45 filtered and -80°C frozen before use.

Culture, transduction and selection of transduced cells

CD34+ cells were cultured in X-Vivo 10 (Bio Whittaker) serum free medium containing the cytokines thrombopoietin (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), FLT3-Iigand (PeproTech), stem cell factor (R&D Systems Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 50 ng/ml (thereafter designated complete medium) at 5–6 × 105cells/cm2 for 84 hours. Transduction of CD34+ cells were performed in complete medium, at the same cell concentration. Cells were prestimulated for 24 hours, and overnight transduced with the BML-1 retroviral vector on RetroNectin (TaKara Biomedicals, Kyoto, Japan)-coated non-tissue culture-treated plates, or T75 flasks, with 4:1 v/v SN/culture medium, supplemented with 5× concentrated cytokines. Fresh complete medium was replaced after virus withdrawal and cells were cultured for further 48 hours. At the end of the culture, cells were collected, washed, and incubated with anti-NGFR biotinylated antibody at 2.5 × 106 cell/ml for 30 minutes at 4°C and then with 10 μl streptavidin (SA)-conjugated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 15 minutes at 4°C. ΔNGFR+ cells were then isolated by mini-MACS immunoselection device. ΔNGFR positive and negative fractions were analyzed by flow-cytometry for CD34, CD45, CD138, and ΔNGFR antigens. Clonal transduction of CD138+ cells was performed in U-bottom 96-well plates with 4:1 SN/culture medium only in wells scored positive for 1 cell at light microscope. Prestimulation was performed with 40 μl of complete medium, and after 24 hours, 128 μl of virus, complemented with 32 μl of 5× cytokines, were directly added to each well. To avoid disturbance of the cells, transduction was stopped by substituting 150 μl of medium with fresh complete medium. Doubling of single cells was scored daily by microscopy and viability of cells using Trypan blue exclusion assessed at the end of transduction.

Immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometric analyses

Cells were stained with conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in 100 μl PBS, 0,1% sodium-azide, 0,3% BSA (PBS FACS) at 4°C for 25 minutes, after the staining cells were washed and resuspended in PBS FACS. For biotinylated mAbs a secondary staining with streptavidin-PE/FITC was performed. The following mAbs were used: CD34-PE (Becton Dickinson, San Josè, California, USA), CD45-FITC/TC (Caltag, Burlingame, California, USA), CD138-FITC (Valter Occhiena, Torino, Italy), CD38-TC (Caltag), SA-FITC/PE/TC (Caltag), biotinylated-NGFR. Isotype-identical mAbs IgG1-FITC/PE/TC and biotinylated-IgG1 (Caltag) served as control. Samples were acquired with FacsScan device (Becton Dickinson). Data were analyzed using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson).

In vitro clonogenic cell assays

Long-term marrow cultures (LTMC) were performed according to a described procedure [20]. Briefly, 70000 CD34+/ΔNGFR+ cells were seeded on top of MS5 murine stromal cells in Myelocult medium (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, CA), added with 10 ng/ml IL6 (Pepro Tech) and half of the medium was weekly replaced. After three weeks of culture, cells were resuspended in Methocult GF medium (StemCell Technologies) and plated in duplicate in a (Colony Forming Units-Cells) CFU-C assay. Colonies were scored two weeks later, individually picked and DNA was extracted for PCR analysis. DNA extraction was performed adding, for each colony, 25 μl of KCl lysis buffer and protease K at 50 μg/ml. Colonies were incubated overnight at 37°C and heat inactivated for 15' at 94°C. KCl lysis buffer consists of 1:1 v/v mix of solution A (100 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl2) and solution B (10 mM Tris pH 8.3, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1% Tween-20, 1% NP-40). DNA was then analyzed for the presence of ΔNGFR transgene, and patient-specific myeloma markers.

PCR assays

To determine the presence of ΔNGFR transgene, DNA was amplified with primers 5'-LΔ1: GGCCGTTGGATTACACGGTC and 3'-MAGO: CCTACAGGTGGGGTCTTTCA. PCR reactions were carried out in a final volume of 25 μl, with 1 μM primers, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM dNTPs and 1.25 U Taq Gold (Perkin Elmer, Wellesley, MA, USA), at following conditions: 7 minutes at 94°C, 50 seconds at 94°C, 50 seconds at 60°C and 50 seconds at 72°C for 40 cycles, 5 minutes at 72°C. As a control for the presence of DNA, HLA genes were amplified (primer 5':GTGCTGCAGGTGTAAACTTGTACCAG and primer 3':CACGGATCCGGTAGCAGCGGTAGAGTTG). PCR conditions were the same as above, except for annealing temperature that was 56°C.

To detect tumor cells, the clonal variable region (VDJ) rearrangements of the IgH genes of each patient were amplified using 5' consensus primers derived from the conserved sequences of the variable region and 3' consensus primer derived from the joining region as previously described [21]. PCR products were sequenced and sequences from CDR2 and CDR3 regions were used to design patient-specific tumor primers. Oligonucleotides were subsequently tested for specificity using polyclonal DNA from normal individuals as negative controls. For each patient, CD34+ cells before and after culture, and after ΔNGFR immunoselection were amplified to detect residual myeloma cells. Cells were directly resuspended at 1 × 105/50 μl in KCl lysis solution for genomic DNA extraction (as described above) and PCR amplifications were performed using 5, or 10 μl of DNA. A first round PCR was performed using patient specific VH family primers and a second round was performed amplifying 1 μl of the first PCR product with patient-specific primers. The sensitivity was 10-4-10-5 [21].

Limiting dilution assays were performed serially diluting DNA with water, in 0.5 log increments and each dilution was subsequently amplified with patient-specific primers. At least five PCR reactions were performed for each dilution level from the level in which reactions were positive up to the level in which all reactions were negative for clonal markers. Polyclonal DNA was always included as negative control. This technique has been previously validated by diluting a known number of tumor cells in normal marrow or peripheral blood cells. An indirect quantification of the tumor load in the positive samples of the dilution was performed according to the statistical methods of likelihood maximization and χ2 minimization (MC), derived from the single-hit Poisson model, as described by Taswell [22]. Combined frequency estimates were obtained by analyzing with MC estimator the pooled frequency determinations. Comparison of frequencies between groups was performed through evaluation of confidence interval (CI) and probability value, and CI for the ratio of 2 frequencies. All calculations were performed using MATLAB (version 5, The Math Works Inc.).


Culture of myeloma aphereses, transduction and selection procedures

Nineteen MPB leukaphereses products were CD34-selected by miniMACS (n = 15), midiMACS (n = 1), cliniMACS (n = 1) or ISOLEX immunoselection system (n = 2). Mean purity of CD34+ cells was 80.6 ± 19% (Table 1). CD34+ cells were cultured for 84 hours, in complete medium. We previously described that this protocol allows a safe expansion of multipotent progenitors, without impairing their reconstitution capacity in severe combined immunodeficiency-humanized (SCID-hu) mice [18]. A portion of the CD34+ cells was exposed to a retroviral transduction: after 24 hours of culture with complete medium, cells were overnight transduced with a MoMLV-derived retroviral vector, carrying the ΔNGFR gene [17]. After transduction, viral supernatant was replaced with fresh complete medium, and cells were allowed to express the transgene for further 48 hours (total culture time 84 hours, as in the non-retroviral exposed cytokine-culture). Transduced cells were immunoselected by ΔNGFR expression with MACS immunoselection system (Figure 1A), as previously described [23]. Mean CD34+ cells transduction rate was 28.9 ± 12%, and purity of ΔNGFR immunoselected CD34+ cells was 92.5 ± 5%.

Table 1 Results of CD34+ cell selection, culture and transduction
Figure 1
figure 1

MPB CD34+ cells of myeloma patients before and after culture, and transduction. (A) Phenotypic analyses of CD34+ cells before and after cytokine culture, ΔNGFR transduction, and selection of transduced cells. (B) Relative fold expansion in culture, and recovery after transduction and selection of total cells (open bars) and CD34+ cells (black bars), were measured, in comparison with the initial cell population (fresh cells).

At the end of the procedure, 67.7 ± 13% of ΔNGFR selected cells still retained the CD34 phenotype, indicating a recovery of 22.3 ± 15% of the initial CD34+ cell number (Table 1).

We did not observe differences in results when we performed the procedure with high numbers of CD34+ cells (Table 1: exp. MM12, and MM14).

Mean fold-expansion of cytokine-cultured cells was 1.4, and CD34+ cells after culture were 128.5% of the initial number. CD34+ antigen expression was 91.8 ± 4% after cytokine culture, and 67,7 ± 13% after transduction and selection of ΔLNGFR+ cells. Recovery of total cells and CD34+ cells in a representative experiment is shown in Figure 1B.

Molecular purging

To assess the results of myeloma-cell purging, we developed patient-specific primers for tumor-specific monoclonal immunoglobulin gene rearrangements in 9 patients (MM#3,6,10/14,12,13,15,16,18 and 19). We amplified by PCR complementary determining regions I and III of the heavy chain VDJ immunoglobulin fragments, and we monitored monoclonal residual rearrangements in the apheresis product, after CD34+ selection, after culture and after transduction. Mononuclear cells, CD34+ fresh cells, cytokines-cultured cells, and ΔLNGFR-positive and -negative selected fractions were analyzed in 10 experiments, and DNA was amplified for myeloma specific clonal rearrangements.

Undiluted DNA was first amplified in 5 PCR reactions for each patient. Only in samples where sufficient material was available (n = 6), serial 0.5 log dilutions of DNA were performed before amplification, to allow a quantification of the purging. Results of the amplifications were interpreted with a Poisson estimate [22]. Since no quantitative real-time PCR has been performed, the results should be taken in relative terms (logdecreaseoftheinitialcell frequency). When we amplified DNA from mobilized aphereses, 83.3% of samples showed detectable myeloma contaminants, and 77.8% of the samples still retained myeloma cells after CD34+ antigen selection (Table 2, gray shaded cells). The amount of tumor decrease after this first purging-step ranged from <0.67 to 1.36 logs. After ex-vivo cytokine culture, 57.1% (4 out of 7) tumor-positive CD34+ samples lost myeloma specific rearrangements (MM6,14,18,19), with an estimation of 0 to >2.35 logs purging, with respect to the initial tumor load. We then measured how cell exposure to retroviral vector, and selection of transgene-expressing cells contributed to the purging. All the samples purged after cytokines-culture were also PCR negative for myeloma specific rearrangements after transduction and selection of the ΔNGFR+ cell fraction. Among the 3 ΔNGFR+ selected samples still positive for myeloma specific rearrangements, we observed a further decrease of myeloma contamination in samples MM15 and MM16 (range of purging: 0–5 to 1 log). Comparing the frequencies of tumor load in the different pooled data, we found a strong statistical significance between fresh CD34+ cells vs. CD34+ cells after culture, and after ΔNGFR selection (Table 3). When we compared the purging results of the culture with the ΔNGFR+ cell fraction, we failed to find a relevant statistical significance (p > 0.1). This result suggests that the culture itself plays a major role in the purging.

Table 2 Results of tumor cell purging in mobilized blood cells before and after serial purging steps
Table 3 Statistical comparison of tumor load between different cell populations

Multiple myeloma cells: transduction and division pattern

To assess the transduction rate of myeloma cells, we infected BM CD34+ cells of a MM patient, after adding back to the cell population CD138+ myeloma plasma cells sorted from the same patient (ratio 1:1). By this way we reproduced our experimental condition setting, which includes a mixed population of healthy CD34+ cells and myeloma cells. In addition, in a parallel experiment, we transduced CD138+ sorted cells at 1 × 106/well, to assess the transduction rate on a consistent number of cells, and at 1 cell/well, to study the division rate of tumor cells during transduction and therefore the possibility of the single cell to be infected by retroviral vectors (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Transduction pattern of myeloma plasma cells. CD138+ selected myeloma bone marrow plasma cells were transduced with the ΔNGFR vector in a bulk, and in a clonal culture (B and C). Part of the cells was mixed before transduction with CD34+ cells of the same patient (A). Culture conditions were the same as in the CD34+ cell transductions.

Clonal transduction was performed at the same concentration of cytokines and virus as in the standard cell transduction, and the division pattern scored during the culture by light microscope (n = 89 single-cell wells). At the end of procedure we stained each well with Trypan-blue dye, to assess the viability of the cells. Whereas transduction rate of CD34+ cells was 21.4% in the mixed cell population, no CD138+ cell was transduced, neither in this cell population, nor in the CD138+ selected cells. The rate of CD138+ clonal cell division during viral exposition was 3.7%, but all cells died before the end of procedure, as assessed by Trypan blue labelling.

Previous studies report that LTMC can sustain myeloma cells [20]. To exclude the presence of myeloma "long-living" contaminants, or possible myeloma precursors in the transduced and selected cell fraction, we seeded CD34+/ΔLNGFR+ cells of patient MM18 in a LTMC assay, adding IL6 to the culture to favour the maintenance of the plasma cells in culture. After 3 weeks, the cells were placed in a CFU-C assay, picked at the end of the culture, and analyzed for specific myeloma rearrangements. 100% of the colonies (42 out of 42) tested resulted negative for the patient-specific rearrangement (data not shown).


Available clinical evidences suggest that CD34+ selection reduces myeloma contamination in PBSC (Peripheral Blood Stem Cell) collections [5, 6, 24, 25], however, it does not eliminate it, and it does not improve disease-free or overall survival of transplanted patients [8, 9, 26]. We sought to improve the molecular purging of leukaphereses for autografting by exploiting the in-vitro biological behaviour of myeloma cancer cells. The results achieved with our protocol strongly suggest that optimised short-culture conditions provide a major contribution to purging: rearrangement-undetectable CD34+ cells were generated in 57% (4 out of 7) samples. To further improve the purging results, we exposed CD34-selected cells to a retroviral transduction with a selectable membrane-associated marker. This innovative combined procedure exploits the gene transfer technique to enrich for high repopulating-capacity CD34+ cells, and, at the same time, to eliminate myeloma contaminants. Moreover, an advantage of this approach is that it foresees the outcome of a possible future gene therapy addressed to the CD34+ cells and their progeny.

The transduction and selection results indicate that the procedure is clinically feasible, with a mean amount of 22.3 ± 15% final transduced and selected CD34+ cells, with respect to the initial CD34+ cell number. We have previously demonstrated that ΔLNGFR+ selected CD34+ cells are capable of developing a multilineage reconstitution profile in a relevant animal model [18]. Previous reports have already assessed ex-vivo culture for purging of tumor cells in myeloma and lymphoma [27, 28], but the long culture period (7–21 days) render these cells unsuitable for reinfusion.

We could not correlate our purging efficiency with cell expansion, neither with transduction efficiency, nor with cell recovery. The only parameter we could link with a poor purging outcome was the ΔNGFR purity of selection. Although it occurred in a single sample, a ΔNGFR purity of <93% correlated with the persistency of tumor contamination after culture and selection of transduced cells (see Table 1 and 2).

ΔNGFR+ selection appeared to improve the tumor load removal, with respect to the simple culture-based purging. However, we did not observe a complete elimination of residual myeloma contaminants. DNA deriving from dead cells, still present at the end of the procedure, or actual tumor contaminants could explain the incomplete purging. Our experiments show a very low probability for plasma cells to be transduced in these culture conditions. Rather, the involvement of myeloma plasma cells in ΔLNGFR selection could occur because of their inherent characteristics, leading them to adhere via surface Ig to beads-coated antibodies. Since we did not reach a complete purging in ΔLNGFR+ selected cells, we performed a clonogenic analysis on a ΔLNGFR+ contaminated cell fraction which suggested that the myeloma contaminants present in the final cell fraction do not retain clonogenic capacity.

We previously demonstrated the multilineage reconstitution potential of MPB CD34+ cells treated with the same culture and transduction protocol in SCID-hu animal models [18]. This particular animal model allows the differentiation of lymphocytes in a suitable microenvironment. We showed a maintained lymphoid reconstitution potential, with differentiation of mature B and T cells after CD34+ cell transplant. We assume that a good and early lymphoid cell reconstitution is necessary in myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplants to protect against post-transplant infections [13], and probably against early tumor relapse. Nevertheless, we acknowledge the need for a more stringent assay of myeloid repopulating capacity, in order to move the technique into clinical application.

Recently, several clinical leukemia events reported by Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. in severe combined immunodeficiency-X linked (SCID-X) patients treated with γ-chain transduced CD34+ cells [29] raised questions about the general safety of retrovirus-based gene therapy. The issue is still under intensive investigation with extensive analyses performed on transduced cells [30]. So far, no other group has reported similar adverse events, despite a high number of clinical trials performed in more than 10 years of gene therapy and gene marking studies [31]. Still, a justified caution in evaluating risks and benefits of a gene therapy clinical procedure is now mandatory.

Among the performed sequential purging steps, the CD34 selection was the least efficient: we could also consider applying the culture protocol directly to the whole leukapheresis. Provided that we reach experimental evidences of a similar purging, this setting would simplify the cell manipulation process and render the procedure more suitable for a clinical application.


We conclude that the culture purging approach we have devised could be a feasible and efficient procedure for MM patients undergoing autologous transplantation. There is also a tendency of myeloma contaminants to further decrease after transduction and selection of CD34+ cells, as compared with the simple culture. An advantage of the transduction protocol is a potentially myeloma-free population of marked cells, detectable over time. Gene marking of autografted cells has been shown to be a valuable tool to trace long-term reconstitution of the host [32], and the origin of disease relapse [33]. A pilot study for MM patients eligible to high dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant would clarify the effectiveness of the purging transplant approach described in this work. The safe reconstitution capacity of CD34+ transduced cells could also allow a future gene therapy trial directed to hematopoietic CD34+ cells.



truncated form of the human Nerve Growth Factor Receptor


Bone Marrow


Colony Forming Units-Cells


Confidence Interval


Graft versus Host Disease


Immunoglobulin Heavy chain




Long-Term Marrow Cultures


Method of likelihood maximization and χ2 minimization


Multiple Myeloma


Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus


Mobilized Peripheral Blood


Peripheral Blood Stem Cell


Severe Combined Immunodeficiency-humanized


Severe Combined Immunodeficiency-X linked


Viral Supernatant


  1. Fermand JP, Ravaud P, Chevret S, Divine M, Leblond V, Belanger C, Macro M, Pertuiset E, Dreyfus F, Mariette X, Boccacio C, Brouet JC: High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Up-front or Rescue Treatment? Results of a Multicenter Sequential Randomized Clinical Trial. Blood. 1998, 92: 3131-3136.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K, Brown J, Drayson MT, Selby PJ, Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party: High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 1875-83. 10.1056/NEJMoa022340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet JG, Monconduit M, Hulin C, Caillot D, Bouabdallah R, Voillat L, Sotto JJ, Grosbois B, Bataille R, InterGroupe Francophone du Myelome: Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003, 349: 2495-502. 10.1056/NEJMoa032290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schiller G, Vescio R, Freytes C, Spitzer G, Sahebi F, Lee M, Wu CH, Cao J, Lee JC, Hong CH, Lichtenstein A, Lill M, Hall J, Berenson R, Berenson J: Transplantation of CD34+ peripheral blood progenitor cells after high-dose chemoterapy for patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Blood. 1995, 86: 390-397.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lemoli RM, Fortuna A, Motta MR, Rizzi S, Giudice V, Nannetti A, Martinelli G, Cavo M, Amabile M, Mangianti S, Fogli M, Conte R, Tura S: Concomitant mobilization of plasma cells and hematopoietic progenitors into peripheral blood of multiple myelma patients: positive selection and transplantation of enriched CD34+ cells to remove circulating tumor cells. Blood. 1996, 87: 1625-1634.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel W, Kopp HG, Kanz L, Einsele H: Myeloma cell contamination of peripheral blood stem-cell grafts can predict the outcome in multiple myeloma patients after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005, 131 (4): 214-8. 10.1007/s00432-004-0635-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gertz MA, Witzig TE, Pineda AA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Litzow MR: Monoclonal plasma cell in the blood stem cell harvest from patients with multiple myeloma are associated with shortened relapse free survival after transplantation. Bone marrow Transplant. 1997, 19: 337-342. 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart AK, Vescio R, Schiller G, Ballester O, Noga S, Rugo H, Freytes C, Stadtmauer E, Tarantolo S, Sahebi F, Stiff P, Meharchard J, Schlossman R, Brown R, Tully H, Benyunes M, Jacobs C, Berenson R, White M, DiPersio J, Anderson KC, Berenson J: Purging of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells using CD34 selection does not improve overall or progression-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001, 19: 3771-3779.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemoli RM, Martinelli G, Zamagni E, Motta MR, Rizzi S, Terragna C, Rondelli R, Ronconi S, Curti A, Bonifazi F, Tura S, Cavo M: Engraftment, clinical, and molecular follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma who were reinfused with highly purified CD34+ cells to support single or tandem high-dose chemoterapy. Blood. 2000, 95: 2234-2239.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gazitt Y, Reading CC, Hoffman R, Wickrema A, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, Condino J, Lee B, Barlogie B, Tricot G: Purified CD34+Lin-Thy+ stem cells do not contain clonal myeloma cells. Blood. 1995, 86: 381-389.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Michallet M, Philip T, Philip I, Godinot H, Sebban C, Salles G, Thiebaut A, Biron P, Lopez F, Mazars P, Roubi N, Leemhuis T, Hanania E, Reading C, Fine G, Atkinson K, Juttner C, Coiffier B, Fiere D, Archimbaud E: Transplantation with selected autologous peripheral blood CD34+Thy+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in multiple myeloma: impact of HSC dose on engraftment, safety, and immune reconstitution. Exp Hematol. 2000, 28: 858-870. 10.1016/S0301-472X(00)00169-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Altes A, Sierra J, Esteve J, Martin-Henao G, Marin P, Sureda A, Briones J, Martino R, Villamor N, Colomer D, Carreras E, Garcia J, Brunet S, Montserrat E: CD34+-enriched-CD19+-depleted autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphoproliferative disorders: high purging efficiency but increased risk of severe infections. Exp Hematol. 2002, 30: 824-830. 10.1016/S0301-472X(02)00828-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbui AM, Galli M, Dotti G, Belli N, Borleri G, Gritti G, Bellavita P, Viero P, Comotti B, Barbui T, Rambaldi A: Negative selection of peripheral blood stem cells to support a tandem autologous transplantation programme in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2002, 116: 202-210. 10.1046/j.0007-1048.2001.03189.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Vos J, Bagnis C, Bonnafoux L, Requirand G, Jourdan M, Imbert MC, Jourdan E, Rossi JF, Mannoni P, Klein B: Comparison of murine leukemia virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and adeno-associated virus vectors for gene transfer in multiple myeloma: lentiviral vectors demonstrate a striking capacity to transduce low-proliferating primary tumor cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2003, 14: 1727-1739. 10.1089/104303403322611746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Björkstrand B, Dilber MS, Smith CIE, Gahrton G, Xanthopoulos KG: Retroviral-mediated gene transfer into myeloma cells. Brit J Haematol. 1994, 88: 325-331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bordignon C, Bonini C: A clinical protocol for gene transfer into peripheral blood lymphocytes for in vivo immunomodulation of donor anti-tumor immunity in patients affected by recurrent disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Hum Gen Ther. 1995, 2: 813-819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonini C, Ferrari G, Verzeletti S, Servida P, Zappone E, Ruggieri L, Ponzoni M, Rossini S, Mavilio F, Traversari C, Bordignon C: HSV-TK gene transfer into donor lymphocytes for control of allogeneic graft-versus-leukemia. Science. 1997, 276: 1719-1724. 10.1126/science.276.5319.1719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deola S, Scaramuzza S, Birolo RS, Carballido-Perrig N, Ficara F, Mocchetti C, Dando J, Carballido JM, Bordignon C, Roncarolo MG, Bregni M, Aiuti A: Mobilized blood CD34+ cells transduced and selected with a clinically applicable protocol reconstitute lymphopoiesis in SCID-Hu mice. Hum Gene Ther. 2004, 15: 305-311. 10.1089/104303404322886156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dando JS, Aiuti A, Deola S, Ficara F, Bordignon C: Optimisation of retroviral supernatant production conditions for the genetic modification of human CD34+ cells. J Gene Med. 2001, 3: 219-227. 10.1002/1521-2254(200105/06)3:3<219::AID-JGM184>3.0.CO;2-E.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart AK, Prince HM, Cappe D, Chu P, Lutzko C, Sutherland DR, Dube ID: In vitro maintenance and retroviral transduction of human myeloma cells in long-term marrow cultures. Cancer Gene Ther. 1997, 4: 148-156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voena C, Ladetto M, Astolfi M, Provan D, Gribben JG, Boccadoro M, Pileri A, Corradini P: A novel nested-PCR strategy for the detection of rarranged immunoglobulin heavy-chain genes in B cell tumors. Leukemia. 1997, 1: 1793-1798. 10.1038/sj.leu.2400801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taswell C: Limiting dilution assays for the determination of immunocompetent cell frequencies. I. Data analysis. J Immunol. 1981, 126: 1614-1619.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deola S, Bregni M, Ficara F, Dando J, Bordignon C, Aiuti A: Efficient ex-vivo immunoselection of ΔNGFR-transduced mobilized CD34+ cells [abstract]. Haematologica. 1999, 84: 124-

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rasmussen T, Bjorkstrand B, Andersen H, Gaarsdal E, Johnsen HE: Efficacy and safety of CD34-selected and CD19-depleted autografting in multiple myeloma patients: a pilot study. Exp Hematol. 2002, 30: 82-88. 10.1016/S0301-472X(01)00758-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tricot G, Gazitt Y, Leemhuis T, Jagannath S, Desikan KR, Siegel D, Fassas A, Tindle S, Nelson J, Juttner C, Tsukamoto A, Hallagan J, Atkinson K, Reading C, Hoffman R, Barlogie B: Collection, tumor contamination, and engraftment kinetics of highly purified hematopoietic progenitor cells to support high dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood. 1998, 91: 4489-4495.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar A, Loughran T, Alsina M, Durie BGM, Djulbegovic B: Management of multiple myeloma: a systemic review and critical appraisal of published studies. Lancet. 2003, 4: 293-304. 10.1016/S1470-2045(03)01077-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Riet I, Juge-Morineau N, Schots R, De Waele M, De Greef C, Thielemans K, Van Camp B, Bakkus M: Persistence of residual tumour cells after cytokine-mediated ex vivo expansion of mobilized CD34+ blood cells in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 1997, 96: 403-11. 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.d01-2038.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Widmer L, Pichert G, Jost LM, Stahel RA: Fate of contaminating t(14; 18)+ lymphoma cells during ex vivo expansion of CD34-selected hematopoietic progenitor cells. Blood. 1996, 88: 3166-75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P, Lim A, Osborne CS, Pawliuk R, Morillon E, Sorensen R, Forster A, Fraser P, Cohen JI, de Saint Basile G, Alexander I, Wintergerst U, Frebourg T, Aurias A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Romana S, Radford-Weiss I, Gross F, Valensi F, Delabesse E, Macintyre E, Sigaux F, Soulier J, Leiva LE, Wissler M: LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science. 2003, 302: 415-9. 10.1126/science.1088547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thrasher AJ, Gaspar HB, Baum C, Modlich U, Schambach A, Candotti F, Otsu M, Sorrentino B, Scobie L, Cameron E, Blyth K, Neil J, Abina SH, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Fischer A: Gene therapy: X-SCID transgene leukaemogenicity. Nature. 2006, 443 (7109): 1123-10.1038/nature05219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonini C, Grez M, Traversari C, Ciceri F, Marktel S, Ferrari G, Dinauer M, Sadat M, Aiuti A, Deola S, Radrizzani M, Hagenbeek A, Apperley J, Ebeling S, Martens A, Kolb HJ, Weber M, Lotti F, Grande A, Weissinger E, Bueren JA, Lamana M, Falkenburg JH, Heemskerk MH, Austin T, Kornblau S, Marini F, Benati C, Magnani Z, Cazzaniga S: Safety of retroviral gene marking with a truncated NGF receptor. Nat Med. 2003, 9: 367-9. 10.1038/nm0403-367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brenner MK, Rill DR, Holladay MS, Heslop HE, Moen RC, Buschle M, Krance RA, Santana VM, Anderson WF, Ihle JN: Gene marking to determine whether autologous marrow infusion restores long-term haemopoiesis in cancer patients. Lancet. 1993, 342: 1134-7. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92122-A.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brenner MK, Rill DR, Moen RC, Krance RA, Mirro J, Anderson WF, Ihle JN: Gene-marking to trace origin of relapse after autologous bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet. 1993, 341: 85-6. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92560-G.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Chiara Villa and Vittorio Perfetti for the work performed on patient-specific tumor rearrangements, Juan A Bueren and Guillermo Guenechea for help with animal experiments, and Paolo Corradini for helpful discussions. We also thank Giovanna Scarel for careful revision of the manuscript.

Supported in part by a grant from Consiglio Nazionale Ricerche and from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro to MB, and by a grant from FIRB, Ministero dell'Università e Ricerca Scientifica, to AA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Deola.

Additional information

Declaration of competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SD performed experiments, analyses and wrote the paper.

SS, RSC, MC, FF, JD performed cell culture experiments and analyses.

CV and MM created the patient specific sequences, and analysed the molecular purging data

SV performed statistical analyses.

EP, GC, JP, CB, MGR and AA participated in the study design.

MB conceived the study, coordinated the work, and helped in writing the paper.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deola, S., Scaramuzza, S., Birolo, R.S. et al. Molecular purging of multiple myeloma cells by ex-vivo culture and retroviral transduction of mobilized-blood CD34+ cells. J Transl Med 5, 35 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: