Skip to main content
Download PDF

Therapy of established B16-F10 melanoma tumors by a single vaccination of CTL/T helper peptides in VacciMax®

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 5, Article number: 20 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Melanoma tumors are known to express antigens that usually induce weak immune responses of short duration. Expression of both tumor-associated antigens p53 and TRP2 by melanoma cells raises the possibility of simultaneously targeting more than one antigen in a therapeutic vaccine. In this report, we show that VacciMax® (VM), a novel liposome-based vaccine delivery platform, can increase the immunogenicity of melanoma associated antigens, resulting in tumor elimination.

Methods

C57BL/6 mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma tumors were vaccinated subcutaneously 6 days post tumor implantation with a mixture of synthetic peptides (modified p53: 232–240, TRP-2: 181–188 and PADRE) and CpG. Tumor growth was monitored and antigen-specific splenocyte responses were assayed by ELISPOT.

Results

Vaccine formulated in VM increased the number of both TRP2- and p53-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes following a single vaccination. Vaccine formulated without VM resulted only in enhanced IFN-γ producing splenocytes to one CTL epitopes (TRP2:180–188), suggesting that VM overcomes antigen dominance and enhances immunogenicity of multiple epitopes. Vaccination of mice bearing 6-day old B16-F10 tumors with both TRP2 and p53-peptides formulated in VM successfully eradicated tumors in all mice. A control vaccine which contained all ingredients except liposomes resulted in eradication of tumors in no more than 20% of mice.

Conclusion

A single administration of VM is capable of inducing an effective CTL response to multiple tumor-associated antigens. The responses generated were able to reject 6-day old B16-F10 tumors.

Background

Previous studies using two mouse models have demonstrated that peptide-based vaccines delivered using VacciMax® (VM) can eradicate human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 induced tumors [1, 2]. The aim of the present study is to use VM in a therapeutic vaccine to treat C57BL/6 mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma tumors. Eradication of both HPV 16 and B16-F10 melanoma tumors would suggest that VM could enhance various therapeutic cancer vaccines. The identification of tumor-associated antigens that are recognized by CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) has led to the development of specific anti-tumor immunotherapies. Vaccine approaches for the treatment of cancer rely on the expansion and differentiation of tumor-specific CTL's, with the objective of rejecting established tumor. Peptide vaccines elicit a poor immune response and often require the use of potent adjuvants. Previous studies in our laboratory have shown that formulation of peptides in a vaccine enhancing platform, VM, can greatly enhance peptide-specific immune responses. VM is a liposome-based antigen delivery platform which we have shown to be effective in both preventing and eradicating established HPV 16-induced tumors in mouse models [1, 2]. The strong and specific CTL responses generated by VM against a variety of peptide antigens suggest that VM can be used to develop therapeutic vaccines against a variety of cancers. This report examines the use of VM in a melanoma mouse model.

A number of melanoma-associated antigens (MAA) have been identified as potential targets but most induce weak immune responses of limited duration. MAAs, expressed by both normal and malignant melanocytes, are self antigens that are difficult to target in a vaccine. MAAs include melanoma-specific antigens such as MART-1, gp100 and TRP2 [3], as well as antigens such as mutated p53 found in a variety of cancers [4–11]. The melanoma tumor cell line B16-F10 used in this study expresses two MAAs of interest, namely TRP-2 and mutated p53.

In this study, VM containing TRP2 and p53 CTL epitopes was used as a therapeutic vaccine to treat C57BL/6 mice bearing B16-F10 melanoma tumors. TRP2 was selected because clinical tumor regression has been associated with TRP2-specific T cells [12–17]. p53, on the other hand, was selected because it is expressed in a variety of cancers including melanoma [5, 18–23], and the ability to induce effective immune responses against p53 in a melanoma model may have implications for the treatment of other cancers.

Methods

Mice and cell lines

Pathogen-free C57BL/6 female mice, 6–8 weeks of age, were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and were housed under filter top conditions with water and food ad libitum. The B16-F10 melanoma cell line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). The melanoma cell line was cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (DMDM, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Hyclone), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco), 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), penicillin and streptomycin (100 μg/ml;Gibco). Cells were incubated at 37°C/5% CO2.

Peptides and oligonucleotide (ODN)

The tyrosinase-related protein peptides TRP2: 180–188 (SVYDFFVWL) and TRP2: 181–188 (VYDFFVWL), as well as the modified p53 peptide (p53: 232–240; KYICNSSCM) fused to PADRE (AKXVAAWTLKAAA, where X is cyclohexylalanine) were purchased from Dalton Chemical Laboratories Inc. (Toronto, ON, Canada). These peptides are presented by murine MHC-class I H-2K. The TRP2 and p53 peptides were stored as a 1 mg/ml stock solution containing DMSO to maintain solubility. Further dilutions for vaccine production were made using PBS.

All formulations of the vaccines contained either PADRE (AKXVAAWTLKAAA-OH; 25 μg/dose) and CpG ODN 1826 (5'-TCCATGACGTT CCTGACGTT-3'; Coley Pharmaceutical, Wellesley, MA; 50 μg/dose). The amino acid sequence of the irrelevant peptide used in ELISPOT was EGSRNQDWL (Dalton Chemical Laboratories Inc.).

Tumor challenge

B16-F10 cells (104 cells/mouse) were implanted subcutaneously in the left flank of C57BL/6 mice which were 6–8 weeks of age at time of challenge. Tumor were measured with calipers every 2–5 days. Data was reported as a percentage of tumor-bearing mice.

Therapeutic immunization

Four to six days after implantation of melanoma cells, mice (5 mice/group) received a single subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of VM containing TRP2: 180–188, TRP2: 181–188, or modified p53: 232–240 (25 μg of peptide/mouse). In addition, mice were injected with vaccine containing mixtures of two peptides (25 μg of each peptide/mouse). The mixtures contained either TRP2:180–188 and modified p53 or TRP2 181–188 and modified p53. VM formulations contained PADRE (25 μg/mouse) and CpG (50 μg/mouse) as adjuvants. The peptides and adjuvants were encapsulated in VM as previously described [1]. In brief, lecithin and cholesterol in a ratio of 10:1 (0.2 g lecithin and 0.02 g cholesterol/dose) were dissolved in chloroform/methanol (1:1;v/v) and the solution was filter-sterilized using a PTFE 0.2 μm filter. Chloroform and methanol were removed under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator and traces of the solvents were removed from the resulting thin lipid layer in vacuo. For liposome encapsulation, peptides with CpG and PADRE were dissolved in sterile PBS and the resulting solution added to the thin lipid layer with mixing to form liposomes. The resulting suspension of liposomes was emulsified in Montanide ISA51 (Seppic, France) by adding the liposome/PBS suspension to ISA51 to form a water-in-oil emulsion (PBS:ISA51; 1:1, v/v; 100 μl/dose). Control mice were injected with either vaccines that contained all components of test vaccines except liposomes or phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 100 μL/injection).

Ex vivo analysis of antigen-specific T cells by ELISPOT

Activated antigen-specific splenocytes harvested from immunized C57BL/6 mice were detected using the BD ELISPOT kit following the manufacturer's instructions (BD Bioscience, San Diego, CA). Briefly, on day 8 post-immunization, a 96-well nitrocellulose plate was coated overnight at 4°C with capture antibody (anti-mouse IFN-γ) and then blocked with complete media. Splenocytes were added to wells at an initial concentration of 1 million cells/well in a volume of 100 μl. Cells in a dilution series were either non-stimulated or stimulated with relevant or irrelevant peptides (10 μg/ml).

PMA (5 ng/ml, Sigma) and ionomycin (500 ng/ml, Sigma), served as positive controls and irrelevant peptide and media alone served as negative controls. The plate was incubated overnight at 37°C/5% CO2. The plate was then incubated with detection antibody (a biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody), for 2 hours at room temperature. Unbound detection antibody was removed by washing and the enzyme conjugate (Streptavidin-HRP) was added. Following 1 hour incubation at room temperature, unbound enzyme conjugate was removed by washing and the plate was stained with an AEC substrate solution for 20 minutes. The plate was washed, allowed to air dry overnight, and foci of staining were counted using a magnifying lens.

CD4+ T cell responses to PADRE

The CD4+ T-cell helper response to PADRE was measured by ELISPOT. Eight days post-immunization, splenocytes were recovered from immunized mice and stimulated with PADRE (10 μg/ml). Production of IFN-γ was measured as described above.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD and statistical significance was determined using paired two-tailed Student t-test (p < 0.05).

Results

Eradication of B16-F10 melanoma tumors

The B16-F10 melanoma model was used to demonstrate the therapeutic value of VM formulated with tumor-associated self antigens. Based on our observations that eradication of HPV TC1/A2 tumors was more effective when more than one CTL epitope-containing peptide was incorporated in VM [2], a mixture of 2 peptides formulated in a vaccine enhancement platform was used to eradicate B16-F10 melanoma tumors. All mice immunized against a mixture of TRP2:181–188 and modified p53: 232–240 were tumor-free by 21 days post-immunization (Fig. 1). Mice remained tumor-free until day 30–35, after which tumors regenerated in a number of mice. In this representative experiment, vaccinated mice remained tumor-free until day 33. Thereafter, tumors regenerated in two mice by day 35, in a third mouse by day 42 and in a fourth mouse by day 50 post-immunization. In two similar trials, immunization against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 in VM resulted in tumor rejection in 60–80% of treated mice within 26–32 days post-immunization, (data not shown) and these mice remained tumor-free at the end of the trial (day 40 post-immunization). In contrast, when TRP2 and p53 epitopes were combined with CpG and ISA51 (control vaccination, no liposomes), no more than 20% of mice remained tumor-free mice until day 25–30 and tumors regenerated in all vaccinated mice (data not shown).

Figure 1
figure 1

All mice that received PBS (crosses) developed tumors by day 14 post-immunization. A single immunization against a mixture of TRP2:181–188 and modified p53:232–240 in VM (triangles) rendered all mice tumor-free by 21 days post-immunization. A single administration of TRP2:181–188 alone alone (diamonds) in VM rendered 2/5 mice tumor-free by day 16 post-immunization. A single administration of modified p53:232–240 in VM (squares) delayed tumor development in one mouse, but by day 21 post-immunization, all mice in this group were tumor bearing. In the interval between 25 and 27 days post-immunization, two mice in this group became tumor-free.

Full size image

Immunization against TRP2:180–188 alone plus CpG in VM eradicated tumors in 40% of the mice by 16 days post-immunization. These mice remained tumor-free for the entire monitoring period. Immunization against TRP2:181–188 alone also suppressed tumors in 40% of mice by 16 days post-immunization, but tumors regenerated in these mice by day 30 post-immunization (data not shown).

Immunization of mice against modified p53:232–240 alone delayed tumor development in one mouse but by day 21 post-immunization all mice were bearing tumors. Twenty percent of mice became tumor-free in the interval between day 25 and 27 post-immunization. All control mice injected with PBS developed tumors by day 14 post-immunization.

Induction of cytotoxic T cells

Previous reports have suggested that TRP2, and in particular TRP2 epitope 180–188, are poorly immunogenic [3, 24–34]. In these studies, immunization against TRP2:180–188 required multiple administrations with CpG ODN to induce CTL responses. Even when complemented by PADRE and in IFA, this composition did not result in protection against B16-F10 tumor growth [25, 28]. To assess the ability of VM to enhance the immune response to TRP2:180–188, mice (3–5/group) were immunized against these peptides or an irrelevant peptide in VM. Splenocytes from individual mice were harvested 8 days post-immunization and stimulated in vitro for 12 hours with TRP2:180–188. The number of TRP2:180–188-activated IFN-γ-producing T cells was determined by ELISPOT assay. A significant increase in the number of TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ-producing cells occurred by 8 days post-immunization (Fig. 2). This experiment indicated that VM without adjuvant could induce a CTL response against TRP2:180–188. The presence of CpG ODN in VM increased the CTL response against the epitope by approximately two-fold. TRP2:180–188 alone produced a background CTL response as did immunization against an irrelevant peptide. Similar results were obtained using splenocytes from mice vaccinated with TRP2:181–188 instead of TRP2:180–188 (data not shown). The CTL response to TRP2:181–188 with CpG ODN but without VM was approximately 20% of the CTL response to TRP2:181–188 with CpG ODN in VM. These results indicate that VM stimulates a robust CTL response to TRP2:180–188 and TRP2:181–188.

Figure 2
figure 2

Ex-vivo detection of modified TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes (spot forming cells, SFC) in mice 8 days following a single immunization against TRP2:180–188 in VM. Mice immunized against TRP2:180–188 in VM with CpG adjuvant produced the largest number of cytotoxic T cells. Omission of CpG from the vaccine produced approximately one-half as many SFC. TRP2:180–188 alone and an irrelevant peptide with CpG in VM produced background numbers of SFC.

Full size image

To assess the ability of VM to enhance the immune response to modified p53:232–240, mice (3–5/group) were immunized against modified p53:232–240 in VM, in VM without CpG, without VM liposomes, or against an irrelevant peptide in VM. Splenocytes from individual mice were harvested 8 days post-immunization and stimulated in vitro with modified p53:232–240. A significant increase in the number of modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ-producing cells was observed in mice immunized against modified p53:232–240 in VM by 8 days post-immunization (Fig. 3). This vaccine formulation without CpG produced background numbers of modified p53:232–240-specific splenocytes as did formulations that lacked the liposome component of VM (modified p53:232–240-PADRE-CpG and modified p53:232–240-PADRE). Immunization against an irrelevant peptide also produced similar background numbers of modified p53:232–240-specific splenocytes.

Figure 3
figure 3

Ex-vivo detection of modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes (spot forming cells, SFC) in mice 8 days following a single immunization against modified p53:232–240 in VM. Mice immunized against modified p53:232–240 peptide in VM with CpG and PADRE adjuvants produced the largest number of cytotoxic T cells. Without VM or omission of CpG from the VM formulation produced low numbers of modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes. Vaccination against an irrelevant peptide (IrrPep) also produced low numbers of IFN-γ producing splenocytes.

Full size image

Melanoma cells express more than one tumor-associated protein simultaneously. TRP2 is a tumor-associated protein limited to melanoma, whereas, p53 is over-expressed in a wide variety of cancers. For example, the p53 gene is commonly mutated in lung, colon, and breast cancers. The observation that immunization against a mixture of peptides derived from TRP2 and p53 was more effective in eradicating B16-F10 melanoma tumors than immunization against each of these peptides alone suggests that use of VM induces a CTL response against more than one CTL epitope simultaneously. To evaluate the ability of VM to raise a simultaneous immune response against two targets, mice (3/group) were immunized once against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 peptides, with and without VM, or with and without CpG ODN (Fig. 4). All vaccine formulations contained water-in-oil emulsions. Formulations without VM contained all vaccine ingredients except liposomes. Spleens were collected 8 days post-immunization and the number of IFN-γ producing cells was measured by ELISPOT assay. A single immunization with VM containing both TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 antigens stimulated a robust IFN-γ response against both antigens simultaneously. Spleens from mice immunized with VM contained similar numbers of TRP2:180–188-specific and modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ producing cells. In contrast, spleens from mice immunized by a single vaccination of a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 without VM produced a robust TRP2:180–188-specific response but a weak modified p53:232–240-specific response. Vaccination against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 without CpG resulted in a poor TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ response and a slightly better modified p53:232–240-specific response. Without VM, both TRP2:180–188- and modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ responses were poor.

Figure 4
figure 4

Spleens from mice immunized against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 in VM contained high numbers of TRP2:180–188-specific (right bar) and modified p53:232–240-specific (left bar) IFN-γ producing cells. In contrast, spleens from mice immunized against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 without VM contained high numbers of TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ producing cells but low numbers of modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ producing cells. The spleens of mice immunized with VM-formulated vaccine without CpG ODN had low numbers of both TRP2:180–188- and modified p53:232–240-specific IFN-γ producing cells as did the spleens of mice from mice immunized without VM.

Full size image

CD4+ T cell responses to PADRE

CD4+ T-cell help is essential for the differentiation and expansion of CTLs [35], as well as their maturation into functional memory CTLs [36]. To achieve CD4+ T-cell help, a universal T helper epitope, PADRE was used in VM [37]. A strong PADRE-specific CD4+ T cell help was induced in mice immunized against TRP2:180–188 with and without VM (Fig. 5). These results along with figures 1 and 2 show the simultaneous induction of immune responses to multiple MHC class I and II peptides when encapsulated in VM.

Figure 5
figure 5

Ex-vivo detection of PADRE-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes (spot forming cells, SFC) in mice (N = 5) 8 days following a single immunization against a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 with and without VM.

Full size image

Discussion

There is an unmet need for new vaccines that are cost effective, safe and yet mount robust, effective and durable immune responses [38]. Liposomes have been described as safe vaccine adjuvants but their use has been limited to aqueous carriers, such as saline, phosphate buffered saline or oil-in-water emulsions. In contrast, liposomes stabilized to remain intact in hydrophobic carriers or water-in-oil emulsions (VM) significantly enhance both humoral and CTL immune responses [1, 2, 39]. To enhance immunity, the VM platform requires both liposomes and a hydrophobic carrier. This combination allows excellent antigen delivery and presentation to the immune system resulting in a durable immune response following a single vaccination. Most vaccines studied using the same mouse model as employed in our studies, are only useful as prophylactic vaccines. Clearance of established tumors by immunization against peptide antigens using VM have also been demonstrated in two independent HPV-cervical cancer models [1, 2]. This strategy is particularly effective when treating virally induced cancers. Self-antigens are tightly guarded by tolerance mechanisms and consequently, tumors presenting "self" antigens are more difficult to treat. Therefore, an effective therapeutic cancer vaccine platform with widespread applications must have the ability to induce immune responses against tumor-associated self antigens. Consequently, a therapeutic vaccine against melanoma must activate and expand T cell clonotypes that have escaped thymus clonal deletion but nevertheless are capable of targeting self epitopes on the surface of tumors.

The B16-F10 melanoma tumor model in C57BL/6 mice has been used in many pre-clinical melanoma studies [3, 24–34]. Consequently, this model was chosen to test VM-based melanoma vaccines that employ "self" antigens such as TRP2 and p53. Although p53 is rarely used as antigen for melanoma immunotherapy, an increased content of p53 in melanoma cell lines and induction of p53-specific CTL responses have been reported by others [4, 5, 10, 20, 23]. Cell-mediated immune responses to TRP epitopes correlated positively with tumor regression [12, 16, 40, 41]. Immune responses against these antigens are difficult to achieve because of immune tolerance mechanisms [42]. Various approaches have been adopted for the generation of CTL responses against B16, including the use of antigen-pulsed DCs or transfection of B16 cells with the gene for GM-CSF [40, 43, 44]. Recently, Jerome and colleagues demonstrated high levels of CTL responses upon vaccination with TRP2 and CpG in liposome [3].

Surprisingly, preliminary studies employing VM detected an ex vivo CTL response against TRP2:180–188 in the absence of adjuvants (Fig. 2). Addition of CpG adjuvant however significantly increased the number of TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes. To increase the number of IFN-γ producing splenocytes that were specific for modified p53:232–240, the presence of both PADRE and CpG were required. Since studies aimed at developing a therapeutic HPV vaccine demonstrated that multiple peptide antigens result in a better outcome than a single peptide antigen [2], a mixture of TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 in VM was evaluated to determine if T cell activation would be directed against one or both peptides. The TRP2:180–188-, modified p53:232–240- and PADRE-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes were expanded in mice immunized with the mixture of three epitopes in VM (Figs 4 and 5). Without VM, only the number of TRP2:180–188-specific IFN-γ producing splenocytes was above background suggesting immuno-dominancy favoring TRP2-specific responses. Although a T helper response was mounted when all three epitopes plus CpG were used without VM, such helper response only supported CTL responses to one of the peptides (TRP2:180–188) and resulted in tumor suppression until day 25–30 in 20–40% of treated mice.

As a realistic model for melanoma immunotherapy, we used peptide antigens derived from the naturally expressed tumor-associated antigens TRP2 and p53 in the B16-F10 melanoma model. Poor immunogenicity of peptides and the fact that B16-F10 cells express very low amounts of MHC class 1 molecules make the B16-F10 model a challenging model for T-cell based immunotherapy [45]. Immunization with liposome-encapsulated TRP2 peptide which were then mixed with CpG ODN caused complete tumor rejection in only 20% of vaccinated mice [3]; VM, on the other hand, caused tumor rejection in all treated mice when two antigens were targeted. The ability to co-deliver antigens and CpG adjuvant by encapsulation in liposomes is a significant advantage for the VM platform; co-encapsulation of antigen and adjuvant within the same liposome is superior to encapsulation of each in separate liposomes [46]. Our study demonstrates that co-encapsulation of adjuvant with peptide antigens derived from two tumor-associated antigens in VM is superior to use of a single peptide antigen. For example, TRP2:180–188 and modified p53:232–240 encapsulated in VM with PADRE and CpG ODN adjuvants caused complete tumor eradication in 100% of vaccinated mice. The same treatment with only one CTL epitope (TRP2:180–188) caused complete tumor suppression for at least 20 days in 60% of vaccinated mice. VM-based vaccines containing more than two peptide antigens may improve the outcome of therapeutic melanoma vaccines as a result of VM's ability to overcome immuno-dominancy.

In summary, the VM vaccine platform simultaneously induces a robust CTL response to more than one peptide antigen contained therein. Immunization against two CTL epitopes in VM formulated with a T helper peptide and CpG adjuvant eradicated tumors in all treated mice. Although regeneration of melanoma tumors occurred in a significant number of mice that had been rendered tumor-free by vaccination, the strong CTL responses to multiple peptides from self-antigens by a single immunization and the rejection of aggressive 6-day old B16-F10 tumors to our knowledge have never been reported. Targeting more than 2 tumor-associated antigens in VM may improve the efficacy of the vaccine and reduce melanoma tumor regeneration.

Conclusion

VacciMax®, a liposome/Water-in-oil based vaccine delivery system, enhances the immunogenicity of melanoma-associated CTL epitopes simultaneously. A single administration of such vaccine elevated specific CTL responses and resulted in the rejection of 6-day old B16-F10 tumors.

Abbreviations

CTL:

cytotoxic T lymphocyte

ELISPOT:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot

TRP-2:

Tyrosinase-Related Protein-2

PADRE:

pan DR epitope

VM:

VacciMax®.

References

  1. Daftarian P, Mansour M, Benoit AC, Pohajdak B, Hoskin DW, Brown RG, Kast WM: Eradication of established HPV 16-expressing tumors by a single administration of a vaccine composed of a liposome-encapsulated CTL-T helper fusion peptide in a water-in-oil emulsion. Vaccine. 2006, 24 (24): 5235-5244. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.03.079.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Daftarian P, Mansour M, Pohajdak B, Fuentest-Ortega A, Korets-Smith E, MacDonald L, Weir GM, Brown RG, Kast WM: Eradication of large tumors tumors by a single administration of VacciMax-encapsulated CTL-T helper peptides in old mice. J Immunother. 2006, 29 (6): 646-

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jerome V, Graser A, Muller R, Kontermann RE, Konur A: Cytotoxic T lymphocytes responding to low dose TRP2 antigen are induced against B16 melanoma by liposome-encapsulated TRP2 peptide and CpG DNA adjuvant. J Immunother. 2006, 29 (3): 294-305. 10.1097/01.cji.0000199195.97845.18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castresana JS, Rubio MP, Vazquez JJ, Idoate M, Sober AJ, Seizinger BR, Barnhill RL: Lack of allelic deletion and point mutation as mechanisms of p53 activation in human malignant melanoma. Int J Cancer. 1993, 55 (4): 562-565. 10.1002/ijc.2910550407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gnjatic S, Cai Z, Viguier M, Chouaib S, Guillet JG, Choppin J: Accumulation of the p53 protein allows recognition by human CTL of a wild-type p53 epitope presented by breast carcinomas and melanomas. J Immunol. 1998, 160 (1): 328-333.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kichina JV, Rauth S, Das Gupta TK, Gudkov AV: Melanoma cells can tolerate high levels of transcriptionally active endogenous p53 but are sensitive to retrovirus-transduced p53. Oncogene. 2003, 22 (31): 4911-4917. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206741.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lentini A, Vidal-Vanaclocha F, Facchiano F, Caraglia M, Abbruzzese A, Beninati S: Theophylline administration markedly reduces hepatic and pulmonary implantation of B16-F10 melanoma cells in mice. Melanoma Res. 2000, 10 (5): 435-443. 10.1097/00008390-200010000-00005.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McGregor JM, Yu CC, Dublin EA, Barnes DM, Levison DA, MacDonald DM: p53 immunoreactivity in human malignant melanoma and dysplastic naevi. Br J Dermatol. 1993, 128 (6): 606-611. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb00253.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss J, Heine M, Arden KC, Korner B, Pilch H, Herbst RA, Jung EG: Mutation and expression of TP53 in malignant melanomas. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1995, 139: 137-154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weiss J, Schwechheimer K, Cavenee WK, Herlyn M, Arden KC: Mutation and expression of the p53 gene in malignant melanoma cell lines. Int J Cancer. 1993, 54 (4): 693-699. 10.1002/ijc.2910540427.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Noguchi Y, Richards EC, Chen YT, Old LJ: Influence of interleukin 12 on p53 peptide vaccination against established Meth A sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92 (6): 2219-2223. 10.1073/pnas.92.6.2219.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Khong HT, Rosenberg SA: Pre-existing immunity to tyrosinase-related protein (TRP)-2, a new TRP-2 isoform, and the NY-ESO-1 melanoma antigen in a patient with a dramatic response to immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2002, 168 (2): 951-956.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu G, Khong HT, Wheeler CJ, Yu JS, Black KL, Ying H: Molecular and functional analysis of tyrosinase-related protein (TRP)-2 as a cytotoxic T lymphocyte target in patients with malignant glioma. J Immunother. 2003, 26 (4): 301-312. 10.1097/00002371-200307000-00002.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenberg SA, Yang JC, Schwartzentruber DJ, Hwu P, Marincola FM, Topalian SL, Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Schwarz SL, Spiess PJ, Wunderlich JR, Parkhurst MR, Kawakami Y, Seipp CA, Einhorn JH, White DE: Immunologic and therapeutic evaluation of a synthetic peptide vaccine for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Nat Med. 1998, 4 (3): 321-327. 10.1038/nm0398-321.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Saffold S, Cao X, Krauss J, Chen W: Eliciting T cell immunity against poorly immunogenic tumors by immunization with dendritic cell-tumor fusion vaccines. J Immunol. 1998, 161 (10): 5516-5524.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang RF, Appella E, Kawakami Y, Kang X, Rosenberg SA: Identification of TRP-2 as a human tumor antigen recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1996, 184 (6): 2207-2216. 10.1084/jem.184.6.2207.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang RF, Johnston SL, Southwood S, Sette A, Rosenberg SA: Recognition of an antigenic peptide derived from tyrosinase-related protein-2 by CTL in the context of HLA-A31 and -A33. J Immunol. 1998, 160 (2): 890-897.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Espenschied J, Lamont J, Longmate J, Pendas S, Wang Z, Diamond DJ, Ellenhorn JD: CTLA-4 blockade enhances the therapeutic effect of an attenuated poxvirus vaccine targeting p53 in an established murine tumor model. J Immunol. 2003, 170 (6): 3401-3407.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim KH, Park EJ, Seo YJ, Cho HS, Kim CW, Kim KJ, Park HR: Immunohistochemical study of cyclooxygenase-2 and p53 expression in skin tumors. J Dermatol. 2006, 33 (5): 319-325. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2006.00076.x.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Offringa R, Vierboom MP, van der Burg SH, Erdile L, Melief CJ: p53: a potential target antigen for immunotherapy of cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000, 910: 223-33; discussion 233-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Peyromaure M, Weibing S, Sebe P, Verpillat P, Toublanc M, Dauge MC, Boccon-Gibod L, Ravery V: Prognostic value of p53 overexpression in T1G3 bladder tumors treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. Urology. 2002, 59 (3): 409-413. 10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01551-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawaki M, Ito Y, Akiyama F, Tokudome N, Horii R, Mizunuma N, Takahashi S, Horikoshi N, Imai T, Nakao A, Kasumi F, Sakamoto G, Hatake K: High prevalence of HER-2/neu and p53 overexpression in inflammatory breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2006, 13 (2): 172-178. 10.2325/jbcs.13.172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vierboom MP, Nijman HW, Offringa R, van der Voort EI, van Hall T, van den Broek L, Fleuren GJ, Kenemans P, Kast WM, Melief CJ: Tumor eradication by wild-type p53-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1997, 186 (5): 695-704. 10.1084/jem.186.5.695.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davila E, Kennedy R, Celis E: Generation of antitumor immunity by cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitope peptide vaccination, CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide adjuvant, and CTLA-4 blockade. Cancer Res. 2003, 63 (12): 3281-3288.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pilon-Thomas S, Li W, Briggs JJ, Djeu J, Mule JJ, Riker AI: Immunostimulatory effects of CpG-ODN upon dendritic cell-based immunotherapy in a murine melanoma model. J Immunother. 2006, 29 (4): 381-387. 10.1097/01.cji.0000199199.20717.67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang JC, Livingstone AM: Cutting edge: CD4+ T cell help can be essential for primary CD8+ T cell responses in vivo. J Immunol. 2003, 171 (12): 6339-6343.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shedlock DJ, Shen H: Requirement for CD4 T cell help in generating functional CD8 T cell memory. Science. 2003, 300 (5617): 337-339. 10.1126/science.1082305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alexander J, Sidney J, Southwood S, Ruppert J, Oseroff C, Maewal A, Snoke K, Serra HM, Kubo RT, Sette A: Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity. 1994, 1 (9): 751-761. 10.1016/S1074-7613(94)80017-0.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders GD, Taira AV: Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for human papillomavirus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9 (1): 37-48.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown RG, Bowen WD, Eddington JD, Kimmins WC, Mezei M, Parsons JL, Pohajdak B: Temporal trends in antibody production in captive grey, harp and hooded seals to a single administration immunocontraceptive vaccine. J Reprod Immunol. 1997, 35 (1): 53-64. 10.1016/S0165-0378(97)00048-X.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Davila E, Celis E: Repeated administration of cytosine-phosphorothiolated guanine-containing oligonucleotides together with peptide/protein immunization results in enhanced CTL responses with anti-tumor activity. J Immunol. 2000, 165 (1): 539-547.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dummer R, Nestle FO: Melanoma Vaccines in Development:Looking to the Future.In BioDrugs Volume 13. Issue 4 ADIS InternationalLimited; 2000:227-231.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Parmiani G, Castelli C, Dalerba P, Mortarini R, Rivoltini L, Marincola FM, Anichini A: Cancer immunotherapy with peptide-based vaccines: what have we achieved? Where are we going?. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002, 94 (11): 805-818.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schreurs MW, Eggert AA, de Boer AJ, Vissers JL, van Hall T, Offringa R, Figdor CG, Adema GJ: Dendritic cells break tolerance and induce protective immunity against a melanocyte differentiation antigen in an autologous melanoma model. Cancer Res. 2000, 60 (24): 6995-7001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sutmuller RP, van Duivenvoorde LM, van Elsas A, Schumacher TN, Wildenberg ME, Allison JP, Toes RE, Offringa R, Melief CJ: Synergism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and depletion of CD25(+) regulatory T cells in antitumor therapy reveals alternative pathways for suppression of autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J Exp Med. 2001, 194 (6): 823-832. 10.1084/jem.194.6.823.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tormo D, Ferrer A, Bosch P, Gaffal E, Basner-Tschakarjan E, Wenzel J, Tuting T: Therapeutic efficacy of antigen-specific vaccination and toll-like receptor stimulation against established transplanted and autochthonous melanoma in mice. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (10): 5427-5435. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang RF, Wang HY: Enhancement of antitumor immunity by prolonging antigen presentation on dendritic cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2002, 20 (2): 149-154. 10.1038/nbt0202-149.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zauner W, Lingnau K, Mattner F, von Gabain A, Buschle M: Defined synthetic vaccines. Biol Chem. 2001, 382 (4): 581-595. 10.1515/BC.2001.071.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhang M, Obata C, Hisaeda H, Ishii K, Murata S, Chiba T, Tanaka K, Li Y, Furue M, Chou B, Imai T, Duan X, Himeno K: A novel DNA vaccine based on ubiquitin-proteasome pathway targeting 'self'-antigens expressed in melanoma/melanocyte. Gene Ther. 2005, 12 (13): 1049-1057. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302490.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bellone M, Cantarella D, Castiglioni P, Crosti MC, Ronchetti A, Moro M, Garancini MP, Casorati G, Dellabona P: Relevance of the tumor antigen in the validation of three vaccination strategies for melanoma. J Immunol. 2000, 165 (5): 2651-2656.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bloom MB, Perry-Lalley D, Robbins PF, Li Y, el-Gamil M, Rosenberg SA, Yang JC: Identification of tyrosinase-related protein 2 as a tumor rejection antigen for the B16 melanoma. J Exp Med. 1997, 185 (3): 453-459. 10.1084/jem.185.3.453.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Turk MJ, Guevara-Patino JA, Rizzuto GA, Engelhorn ME, Sakaguchi S, Houghton AN: Concomitant tumor immunity to a poorly immunogenic melanoma is prevented by regulatory T cells. J Exp Med. 2004, 200 (6): 771-782. 10.1084/jem.20041130.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Timmerman JM, Levy R: Dendritic cell vaccines for cancer immunotherapy. Annu Rev Med. 1999, 50: 507-529. 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.507.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeh HJ, Perry-Lalley D, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA, Yang JC: High avidity CTLs for two self-antigens demonstrate superior in vitro and in vivo antitumor efficacy. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (2): 989-994.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zoller M, Strubel A, Hammerling G, Andrighetto G, Raz A, Ben-Ze'ev A: Interferon-gamma treatment of B16 melanoma cells: opposing effects for non-adaptive and adaptive immune defense and its reflection by metastatic spread. Int J Cancer. 1988, 41 (2): 256-266. 10.1002/ijc.2910410217.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Li WM, Dragowska WH, Bally MB, Schutze-Redelmeier MP: Effective induction of CD8+ T-cell response using CpG oligodeoxynucleotides and HER-2/neu-derived peptide co-encapsulated in liposomes. Vaccine. 2003, 21 (23): 3319-3329. 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00172-5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ImmunoVaccine Technologies Inc., Halifax, NS, Canada

    Marc Mansour, Bill Pohajdak, Antar Fuentes-Ortega, Ella Korets-Smith, Genevieve M Weir, Robert G Brown & Pirouz Daftarian

  2. Dept. of Molecular Microbiology & Immunology and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA

    W Martin Kast

  3. Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

    Pirouz Daftarian

Authors
  1. Marc Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bill Pohajdak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W Martin Kast
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antar Fuentes-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ella Korets-Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Genevieve M Weir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert G Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pirouz Daftarian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pirouz Daftarian.

Additional information

Competing interests

MM, AFO, EKS, GMW and PD are employed by ImmunoVaccine Technologies Inc., the holder of patents relating to the use of liposomes in oil emulsions in vaccine applications as described in this manuscript. However, all experimental data in the current study were evaluated independently by other authors and researchers who have no financial interests in the content of this manuscript.

Authors' contributions

MM contributed largely in experimental design, coordination of experiments and analysis of results. BP contributed in designing the vaccines and reviewing manuscript. MK helped technically and critically reviewed the paper. AFO, EKS, and GMW performed all vaccine preparation, ELISPOT, cell culture, tumor implantation and tumor measurements. RGB, participated in writing the paper. PD conceived the study, designed the vaccine combination, participated in writing the manuscript and analysis of results. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mansour, M., Pohajdak, B., Kast, W.M. et al. Therapy of established B16-F10 melanoma tumors by a single vaccination of CTL/T helper peptides in VacciMax®. J Transl Med 5, 20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-5-20

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-5-20

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us