Skip to main content

Advertisement

HLA class I and II genotype of the NCI-60 cell lines

Article metrics

Abstract

Sixty cancer cell lines have been extensively characterized and used by the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program (NCI-60) since the early 90's as screening tools for anti-cancer drug development. An extensive database has been accumulated that could be used to select individual cells lines for specific experimental designs based on their global genetic and biological profile. However, information on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype of these cell lines is scant and mostly antiquated since it was derived from serological typing. We, therefore, re-typed the NCI-60 panel of cell lines by high-resolution sequence-based typing. This information may be used to: 1) identify and verify the identity of the same cell lines at various institutions; 2) check for possible contaminant cell lines in culture; 3) adopt individual cell lines for experiments in which knowledge of HLA molecule expression is relevant. Since genome-based typing does not guarantee actual surface protein expression, further characterization of relevant cell lines should be entertained to verify surface expression in experiments requiring correct antigen presentation.

Background

A panel of sixty cancer cell lines of diverse lineage (lung, renal, colorectal, ovarian, breast, prostate, central nervous system, melanoma and hematological malignancies) was developed, characterized and extensively used by the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program (NCI-60) since the early 90's as a screening tool for anti-cancer drug development [1]. This strategy [29]. yielded data about drug-related cytotoxicity for about 100,000 compounds. In addition, extensive functional characterization of the NCI-60 response to diverse biological or chemical stimulation has been accumulated [1015]. Although originally developed for chemo-sensitivity testing, with the development of high-throughput analyses the NCI-60 panel has been broadly characterized for other biological applications [1625]. Thus, patterns incidentally identified provided platforms for further investigations of mechanisms of tumorigenesis and cancer progression [5, 6, 2630]. More recently, genomic DNA [24] and proteomics analyses have further characterized the profile of these cell lines [31]. The combined database provides the most comprehensive phenotyping of commonly accessible cancer cell lines offering correlative information about genetic, transcriptional and post-translational qualities. With growing interest in the identification of novel tumor antigens recognized by T cells as targets for antigen-specific immunization ([32], the NCI-60 could become an ideal tool for in silico discovery [33] ([34] and for tumor cell-specific T-cell reactivity testing [35]. For this purpose, accurate information about the extended human leukocyte antigen (HLA) phenotype of each cell line is necessary for the definition and validation of specific HLA/epitope combinations. Although antiquated and partial information about the HLA phenotype of some of the NCI-60 cell lines is available through the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), Rockville, MD, no high-resolution information obtained by definitive sequence-based typing (SBT) has ever been published. Since T cell recognition of HLA-epitope complexes is narrowly restricted to unique combinations [36], this information is critical to select reasonable candidates for antigen-discovery choosing cell lines bearing HLA phenotypes most relevant to the disease population studied [37]. Accurate information about the HLA genotype of each cell line may, in addition, help their identification, validation and qualification among different laboratories excluding possible errors related to switching of cell lines or culture contamination. Therefore, we provide high-resolution SBT of the complete NCI-60 panel obtained from their original source: the National Cancer Institute's Developmental Therapeutics Program.

Results and Discussion

Previous knowledge of the HLA phenotype of NCI-60 cell lines

We reviewed and collected available information about the HLA phenotype of the NCI-60 cell lines, performed according to serological testing before submission to the ATCC (Table 1). The information was collected through the ATCC website: http://www.atcc.org. Most cell lines had not been previously typed; the large majority of the cell lines from which such information is available had been developed from Caucasian patients. HLA typing was reported according to the old serologic nomenclature at a very low level of resolution. In addition, several reported typings did not match the present typing as shown in Table 2 and 3. This was the case for the colon carcinoma cell line HT29 that maintained a correct haplotype (with the exclusion of the HLA-Cw locus) but had a completely different second haplotype. The melanoma cell line SK-MEL-5 had an almost identical haplotype with the exception of one HLA-B allele originally typed as Bw16 (inclusive of the molecularly-defined alleles: B*38 and B*39), while the present typing was HLA-B*07. Another melanoma cell line SK-MEL-28 maintained a haplotype similar to the previously reported HLA-A11, -B40 but appeared to have lost an HLA-A allele (HLA-A26) compared with the original ATCC description. Finally, the multiple myeloma cell line RPMI 8226 was matched at one haplotype (HLA-A19, -B15 and -Cw2) but was totally discrepant at the second haplotype (HLA-A*6802, -B*1510 and -Cw*0304). The HLA typing of the other two previously typed cell lines was confirmed in the present study. Overall, in spite of the discrepancies in HLA typing observed between the previous and the present analyses, a resemblance was noted in the cell line genotype suggesting that mis-typing related to the low accuracy of serological methods might have been at the basis of the discrepancy rather than contamination or switching of the cell lines.

Table 1 Available information from the ATCC about the NCI-60 panel
Table 2 Sequence-based typing of NCI-60 HLA class I Loci
Table 3 Sequence-based typing of NCI-60 HLA class II Loci

Overall, there was no evidence of contamination among the cell lines tested with clean homozygous or heterozygous combinations observed in all loci analyzed. SBT of HLA class I and HLA class II loci are reported in Table 2 and 3 respectively. Information about the HLA typing of the cell lines is also available through the Molecular Targets URL: http://dtp.nci.nih.gov/mtargets/mt_index.html. Approximately 17% of the cell lines (10 out of 58 including: T47D, SNB-19, U251, KM12, RPMI-8226, EKVX, NCI-H23, NCI-H322M, A498, ACHN and TK-10) exhibited a pseudo-homozygous pattern suggestive of complete loss of heterozygosity encompassing the HLA class I and HLA class II regions. This frequency is close to the loss of haplotype that we originally described for melanoma cell lines generated at the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD) [38, 39] and subsequently observed in other cancers [40, 41]. We conclude that this is an unlikely representative of patients' homozygosity because complete HLA class I and II homozygosity is exceedingly rare in the population at large. To corroborate this statement, we analyzed 554 genomic DNA specimens from normal donors recently typed with the same technology in our laboratory. Genomic DNA for the normal donors was obtained from whole blood samples. Only 5 individuals were found to be truly homozygous for all HLA class I and class II loci for a frequency of 0.9%.

Overall, discrepancies between ATCC typings and the present typing or the unbalanced frequency of homozygosity could be related to accumulated genetic alterations between the cell lines since the time of their original expansion from the patient and should not be surprising.

A particular case was represented by the NCI/ADR-RES cell line which was previously believed to be an adriamycin derivative of the breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Subsequently, it was discovered not to be related to MCF-7, but it's derivation was unclear [42]. Karyotyping analysis suggested it was related to the ovarian cell line OVCAR-8. Subsequent DNA fingerprinting confirmed that both cell lines were generated from the same individual. HLA genotyping confirms this since the cell lines are indeed identical.

To avoid possible misinterpretations, a large number of alleles are not presented here with their definitive nomenclature but rather at a two digits level of resolution because some of the ambiguities could not be completely resolved by SBT as previously described [43]. However, more detailed information about individual cell lines can be obtained by contacting Sharon Adams directly at the HLA laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Bethesda, MD. As previously described [43], it is possible to resolve most of these ambiguities using various methods including sequence-specific primer PCR or pyro-sequencing [44]. If necessary in the future, the NIH HLA laboratory may assist in further characterization of individual HLA alleles. Another caveat is that the identification of HLA alleles at the genomic level does not necessarily correspond to surface expression of their protein products since various abnormalities in transcription, translation and assembling could influence the surface expression of HLA molecules [39, 45, 46].

Finally, several new alleles were identified (referred to in the tables as new, for which a nomenclature is pending; in detail KM12 HLA-A*02new = Genebank Accession # AY918166; SN12C HLA-A*24new = # AY918167; CAKI-1 HLA-Cw04new = # AY918170). Information regarding the sequence of these alleles could be obtained by directly contacting the HLA laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

Materials and Methods

Cell Lines

Genomic DNA from the NCI-60 cell line anticancer drug discovery panel was obtained from SH of the National Cancer Institute Developmental Therapeutics Program (Bethesda, MD). Cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 5 mM L-glutamine.

DNA Isolation

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the Gentra PUREGENE isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The DNA was re-suspended in Tris HCl buffer (pH 8.5) and the concentration was measured using a Pharmacia Gene Quant II Spectrophotometer. The DNA was then stored at -70°C until testing.

Sequence-Based Typing (SBT)

HLA class I loci sequence-based typing (SBT) was performed as previously described ([43]. The primary PCR amplification reaction produced a 1.5 kb amplicon encompassing exon 1 through intron 3 of the HLA class I locus. All reagents necessary for primary amplification and sequencing were included in the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C alleleSEQR Sequenced Based Typing Kits (Atria Genetics, Hayward, CA, U.S.A.). The primary amplification PCR products were purified from excess primers, dNTPs and genomic DNA using ExoSAP-IT (American Life Science, Cleveland, OH, U.S.A.). Each template was sequenced in the forward and reverse sequence orientation for exon 2 and exon 3 according to protocols supplied with the SBT kits. Excess dye terminators were removed from the sequencing products utilizing an ethanol precipitation method with absolute ethanol. The reaction products were reconstituted with 15 μl of Hi-Di™ Formamide (PE Applied Biosystems / Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA, U.S.A.) and analyzed on the ABI Prism* 3700 DNA Analyzer with Dye Set file: Z and mobility file: DT3700POP6 [ET].

References

  1. 1.

    Shoemaker RH, Monks A, Alley MC, Scudiero DA, Fine DL, McLemore TL: Development of human tumor cell line panels for use in disease-oriented drug screening. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988, 276: 265-286.

  2. 2.

    Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P, Shoemaker R, Paull K, Vistica D: Feasibility of a high-flux anticancer drug screen using a diverse panel of cultured human tumor cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991, 83: 757-766.

  3. 3.

    Grever MR, Schepartz SA, Chabner BA: The National Cancer Institute: cancer drug discovery and development program. Semin Oncol. 1992, 19: 622-638.

  4. 4.

    Stinson SF, Alley MC, Kopp WC, Fiebig HH, Mullendore LA, Pittman AF: Morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics of human tumor cell lines for use in a disease-oriented anticancer drug screen. Anticancer Res. 1992, 12: 1035-1053.

  5. 5.

    Monks A, Scudiero DA, Johnson GS, Paull KD, Sausville EA: The NCI anti-cancer drug screen: a smart screen to identify effectors of novel targets. Anticancer Drug Des. 1997, 12: 533-541.

  6. 6.

    Weinstein JN, Myers TG, O'Connor PM, Friend SH, Fornace AJ, Kohn KW: An information-intensive approach to the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Science. 1997, 275: 343-349. 10.1126/science.275.5298.343.

  7. 7.

    Gmeiner WH, Skradis A, Pon RT, Liu J: Cytotoxicity and in-vivo tolerance of FdUMP[10]: a novel pro-drug of the TS inhibitory nucleotide FdUMP. Nucleosides Nucleotides. 1999, 18: 1729-1730.

  8. 8.

    Wells G, Seaton A, Stevens MF: Structural studies on bioactive compounds. 32. Oxidation of tyrphostin protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors with hypervalent iodine reagents. J Med Chem. 2000, 43: 1550-1562. 10.1021/jm990947f.

  9. 9.

    Voeller DM, Grem JL, Pommier Y, Paull K, Allegra CJ: Identification and proposed mechanism of action of thymidine kinase inhibition associated with cellular exposure to camptothecin analogs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2000, 45: 409-416. 10.1007/s002800051010.

  10. 10.

    Fong WG, Liston P, Rajcan-Separovic E, St Jean M, Craig C, Korneluk RG: Expression and genetic analysis of XIAP-associated factor 1 (XAF1) in cancer cell lines. Genomics. 2000, 70: 113-122. 10.1006/geno.2000.6364.

  11. 11.

    Salomon AR, Voehringer DW, Herzenberg LA, Khosla C: Apoptolidin, a selective cytotoxic agent, is an inhibitor of F0F1-ATPase. Chem Biol. 2001, 8: 71-80. 10.1016/S1074-5521(00)00057-0.

  12. 12.

    Johnson JI, Decker S, Zaharevitz D, Rubinstein LV, Venditti JM, Schepartz S: Relationships between drug activity in NCI preclinical in vitro and in vivo models and early clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2001, 84: 1424-1431. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1796.

  13. 13.

    Segraves NL, Robinson SJ, Garcia D, Said SA, Fu X, Schmitz FJ: Comparison of fascaplysin and related alkaloids: a study of structures, cytotoxicities, and sources. J Nat Prod. 2004, 67: 783-792. 10.1021/np049935+.

  14. 14.

    Ross DD, Doyle LA: Mining our ABCs: pharmacogenomic approach for evaluating transporter function in cancer drug resistance. Cancer Cell. 2004, 6: 105-107. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.003.

  15. 15.

    Szakacs G, Annereau JP, Lababidi S, Shankavaram U, Arciello A, Bussey KJ: Predicting drug sensitivity and resistance: profiling ABC transporter genes in cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2004, 6: 129-137. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.026.

  16. 16.

    Staunton JE, Slonim DK, Coller HA, Tamayo P, Angelo MJ, Park J: Chemosensitivity prediction by transcriptional profiling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 10787-10792. 10.1073/pnas.191368598.

  17. 17.

    Weinstein JN: Pharmacogenomics. Teaching old drugs new tricks. N Engl J Med. 2002, 343: 1408-1409. 10.1056/NEJM200011093431910.

  18. 18.

    Weinstein JN: Searching for pharmacogenomics markers: the synergy between omic and hypothesis-driven research. Dis Markers. 2002, 17: 77-88.

  19. 19.

    Weinstein JN, Scherf U, Lee JK, Nishizuka S, Gwadry F, Bussey AK: The bioinformatics of microarray gene expression profiling. Cytometry. 2002, 47: 46-49. 10.1002/cyto.10041.

  20. 20.

    Kuo WP, Jenssen TK, Butte AJ, Ohno-Machado L, Kohane IS: Analysis of matched mRNA measurements from two different microarray technologies. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18: 405-412. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.405.

  21. 21.

    Blower PE, Yang C, Fligner MA, Verducci JS, Yu L, Richman S: Pharmacogenomic analysis: correlating molecular substructure classes with microarray gene expression data. Pharmacogenomics J. 2002, 2: 259-271. 10.1038/sj.tpj.6500116.

  22. 22.

    Le QT, Sutphin PD, Raychaudhuri S, Yu SC, Terris DJ, Lin HS: Identification of osteopontin as a prognostic plasma marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 59-67.

  23. 23.

    Lee JK, Bussey KJ, Gwadry FG, Reinhold W, Riddick G, Pelletier SL: Comparing cDNA and oligonucleotide array data: concordance of gene expression across platforms for the NCI-60 cancer cells. Genome Biol. 2003, 4: R82-10.1186/gb-2003-4-12-r82.

  24. 24.

    Roschke AV, Tonon G, Gehlhaus KS, McTyre N, Bussey KJ, Lababidi S: Karyotypic complexity of the NCI-60 drug-screening panel. Cancer Res. 2003, 63: 8634-8647.

  25. 25.

    Weinstein JN, Pommier Y: Transcriptomic analysis of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines. C R Biol. 2003, 326: 909-920.

  26. 26.

    Weinstein JN, Kohn KW, Grever MR, Viswanadhan VN, Rubinstein LV, Monks AP: Neural computing in cancer drug development: predicting mechanism of action. Science. 1992, 258: 447-451.

  27. 27.

    Bates SE, Fojo AT, Weinstein JN, Myers TG, Alvarez M, Pauli KD: Molecular targets in the National Cancer Institute drug screen. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1995, 121: 495-500. 10.1007/BF01197759.

  28. 28.

    O'Connor PM, Jackman J, Bae I, Myers TG, Fan S, Mutoh M: Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with the growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 4285-4300.

  29. 29.

    Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P: Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 227-235. 10.1038/73432.

  30. 30.

    Scherf U, Ross DT, Waltham M, Smith LH, Lee JK, Tanabe L: A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer. Nat Genet. 2000, 24: 236-244. 10.1038/73439.

  31. 31.

    Nishizuka S, Charboneau L, Young L, Major S, Reinhold WC, Waltham M: Proteomic profiling of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines using new high-density reverse-phase lysate microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 14229-14234. 10.1073/pnas.2331323100.

  32. 32.

    Renkvist N, Castelli C, Robbins PF, Parmiani G: A listing of human tumor antigens recognized by T cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2001, 50: 3-15. 10.1007/s002620000169.

  33. 33.

    Vinals C, Gaulis S, Coche T: Using in silico transcriptomics to search for tumor-associated antigens for immunotherapy. Vaccine. 2001, 19: 2607-2614. 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00500-4.

  34. 34.

    Inozume T, Matsuzaki Y, Kurihara S, Fujita T, Yamamoto A, Aburatani H: Novel melanoma antigen, FCRL/FREB, identified by cDNA profile comparison using DNA chip are immunogenic in multiple melanoma patients. Int J Cancer. 2004

  35. 35.

    Fang X, Shao L, Zhang H, Wang S: Web-based tools for mining the NCI databases for anticancer drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004, 44: 249-257. 10.1021/ci034209i.

  36. 36.

    Bettinotti M, Kim CJ, Lee K-H, Roden M, Cormier JN, Panelli MC: Stringent allele/epitope requirements for MART-1/Melan A immunodominance: implications for peptide-based immunotherapy. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 877-889.

  37. 37.

    Kim CJ, Parkinson DR, Marincola FM: Immunodominance across the HLA polymorphism: implications for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother. 1998, 21: 1-16.

  38. 38.

    Marincola FM, Shamamian P, Alexander RB, Gnarra JR, Turetskaya RL, Nedospasov SA: Loss of HLA haplotype and B locus down-regulation in melanoma cell lines. J Immunol. 1994, 153: 1225-1237.

  39. 39.

    Ferrone S, Marincola FM: Loss of HLA class I antigens by melanoma cells: molecular mechanisms, functional significance and clinical relevance. Immunol Today. 1995, 16: 487-494. 10.1016/0167-5699(95)80033-6.

  40. 40.

    Garrido F, Cabrera T, Accola RS, Bensa JC, Bodmer WF, Dohr G: HLA and cancer: 12th International Histocompatibility Workshop study. Genetic diversitity of HLA. Functional and medical implications. Edited by: Charron D. 1997, Sevres, France: EDK, 445-452.

  41. 41.

    Koopman LA, Corver WE, van der Slik AR, Giphart MJ, Fleuren GJ: Multiple genetic alterations cause a frequent and heterogeneous human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen class I loss in cervical cancer. J Exp Med. 2000, 191: 961-976. 10.1084/jem.191.6.961.

  42. 42.

    Scudiero DA, Monks A, Sausville EA: Cell line designation change: multidrug-resistant cell line in the NCI anticancer screen. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998, 90: 862-

  43. 43.

    Adams SD, Barracchini KC, Chen D, Robbins F, Wang L, Larsen P: Ambiguous allele combinations in HLA Class I and Class II sequence-based typing: when precise nucleotide sequencing leads to imprecise allele identification. J Transl Med. 2004, 2: 30-10.1186/1479-5876-2-30.

  44. 44.

    Ramon D, Braden M, Adams S, Marincola FM, Wang L: Pyrosequencing trade mark : A one-step method for high resolution HLA typing. J Transl Med. 2003, 1: 9-10.1186/1479-5876-1-9.

  45. 45.

    Hicklin DJ, Marincola FM, Ferrone S: HLA class I antigen downregulation in human cancers: T-cell immunotherapy revives an old story. Mol Med Today. 1999, 5: 178-186. 10.1016/S1357-4310(99)01451-3.

  46. 46.

    Wang Z, Marincola FM, Rivoltini L, Parmiani G, Ferrone S: Selective human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2 loss caused by aberrant pre-mRNA splicing in 624MEL28 melanoma cells. J Exp Med. 1999, 190: 205-215. 10.1084/jem.190.2.205.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Francesco M Marincola.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, S., Robbins, F., Chen, D. et al. HLA class I and II genotype of the NCI-60 cell lines. J Transl Med 3, 11 (2005) doi:10.1186/1479-5876-3-11

Download citation

Keywords

  • Human Leukocyte Antigen
  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Class
  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Allele
  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Typing
  • Human Leukocyte Antigen Molecule