Skip to main content

Matrine alleviates depressive-like behaviors via modulating microbiota–gut–brain axis in CUMS-induced mice



The realization of the “microbiota–gut–brain” axis plays a critical role in neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly depression, is advancing rapidly. Matrine is a natural bioactive compound, which has been found to possess potential antidepressant effect. However, the underlying mechanisms of regulation of the “microbiota–gut–brain” axis in the treatment of depression by oral matrine remain elusive.


Its antidepressant effects were initially evaluated by behavioral tests and relative levels of monoamine neurotransmitters, and matrine has been observed to attenuate the depression-like behavior and increase neurotransmitter content in CUMS-induced mice. Subsequently, studies from the “gut” to “brain” were conducted, including detection of the composition of gut microbiota by 16S rRNA sequencing; the metabolomics detection of gut metabolites and the analysis of differential metabolic pathways; the assessment of relative levels of diamine oxidase, lipopolysaccharide, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) by ELISA kits or immunofluorescence.


Matrine could regulate the disturbance of gut microbiota and metabolites, restore intestinal permeability, and reduce intestinal inflammation, thereby reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood circulation and brain regions, and ultimately increase the levels of BDNF in brain.


Matrine may ameliorate CUMS-induced depression in mice by modulating the “microbiota–gut–brain” axis.


Depression is a chronic recurrent emotional disorder and physiological disease that has a high global incidence. The World Health Organization (WHO) identified depression as the third leading cause of the global burden of disease in 2008, and predicts that depression will become the first global burden of disease by 2030 [1]. Although depression has an obvious biological basis, its pathogenesis is complicated and not fully understood [2]. Therefore, it is crucial to develop the additional pathological mechanisms of depression.

Following the publication of Jane A. Foster’s article on how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression through the gut–brain axis in 2013 [3], the interaction between the gut microbiota and the brain has gradually become the focus of neuroscience research. Successive studies have reported that the gut microbiota of patients with depression is different from that of healthy people [4], and depression-like behaviors lead to changes in the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota [4, 5], which suggests that depression affects the composition of the gut microbiota. In addition, transplanting the fecal microbiota of patients with major depression into sterile mice exhibited depression symptoms [6], and the recovery of the gut microbiota alleviates depression [7], indicating that changes in the gut microbiota may promote the onset of depression and play a vital role in the pathophysiology of depression. It is worth noting that metabolic disorders have recently been recognized as a characteristic of depression, in which the gut microbiota leads to changes in the intestinal metabolome [8], thereby alleviating intestinal metabolic disorders has become a potential target of antidepressant. The gut microbiota intimately connects the gut and the brain, and regulates the physiology and cognitive function of the brain through neural, endocrine, or immune pathways [9, 10]. Especially in CUMS-induced mice, the inflammatory immune response is closely involved in the bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain [11]. However, the pathogenesis of depression is complicated that the drugs used clinically still have the problem of single therapeutic direction and unsatisfactory therapeutic effects.

Matrine is a quinolizidine alkaloid derived from the traditional Chinese medicine S. alopecuroides. Studies indicate that matrine has anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [12, 13], and exerts antidepressant-like effects on CUMS-induced depression mice by promoting hippocampal PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling [14]. In addition, our previous studies have shown that the total alkaloids of S. alopecuroides with matrine as one of the main components can improve the depression in CUMS-induced mice via modulating the gut microbiota [15]. Accordingly, the purpose of present study is to investigate whether the improvement effect of matrine on the depression-like behavior of CUMS-induced model mice involves gut microbiota through 16S rRNA sequencing, metabolomic detection, and multiple biological detection techniques, and to explore its probable pathways in the “microbiota–gut–brain” axis.

Materials and methods


The experimentations were performed in male ICR mice weighing (18–22 g) obtained from Liaoning Changsheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Changchun, China). The mice were housed in the state of controlled environmental conditions (12 h light/dark cycle; 21 °C ± 1 °C temperature; 52% ± 2% relative humidity), and given a standard diet and water ad libitum.

Chronic unpredictable mild stress and drug treatments

CUMS procedure was performed as described previously with a slight modification [15]. After one week of adaptation, the mice were housed in a separate cage and exposed four weeks of CUMS procedure. The detailed CUMS stressors are as follows: food deprivation for 12 h; water deprivation for 12 h; lights on at night for 12 h; empty cage for 12 h; wet bedding for 12 h; confinement in a tube for 2 h; traffic noise (70–90 dB) for 6 h; cage tilting for 12 h (45°); exposure to a stroboscope for 12 h; foreign body stimulation for 6 h; crowding for 12 h (ten mice within one cage); level shaking for 15 min; food and water deprivation for 24 h (Additional file 1: Table S1). In brief, two different types of mild stressor are applied to mice every day, which varied from day to day to make the stress procedure unpredictable.

Mice were randomly divided into six groups with 10 in each group: Control group (Con, 0.9% physiological saline), CUMS model group (CUMS, 0.9% physiological saline), CUMS + imipramine (CUMS + IMI, 30 mg/kg), CUMS + Low/Medium/High-dose matrine (CUMS + 15 mg/kg; 30 mg/kg; 60 mg/kg MA). Matrine and imipramine were purchased from Yuanye Biological Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and prepared in 0.9% physiological saline. Imipramine was used as a positive control in this study. Except for the intraperitoneal injection of the mice in the imipramine group, the mice in other groups were given intragastric administration. After the CUMS mouse depression model was successfully established, matrine and imipramine were administered every morning at a fixed time (9:00–10:00), and the CUMS procedure was performed 30 min after the drugs were given. The specific experimental time schedule of this study is shown in Fig. 1A.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Body weight change, depressive-like behaviors, and monoamine neurotransmitter levels in different groups. A The schematic representation of experiment schedule. B Body weight change (%) in week 6. C Sucrose preference (%) in the SPT. D Immobility time in the FST. E The number of crossings in the OFT. F The number of rearings in the OFT. G The feeding latency in the NSFT. H The relative levels of monoamine neurotransmitter (5-HT, NE, and DA) in serum. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). *padj < 0.05, **padj < 0.01, ***padj < 0.001 versus the control group (Con); #padj < 0.05, ##padj < 0.01, ###padj < 0.001 versus the CUMS group

Body weight and behavioral test

Body weight

The body weight (BW) of mice was recorded every day, and the weight at week 0 was used as the baseline value. The change in BW in week 6 was calculated as follows: the change in BW/baseline BW × 100%.

Sucrose preference test

The sucrose preference test (SPT) was conducted according to previously described [15]. As shown in Fig. 1A, the SPT was performed at four time points: the adaptation period (week 0), before the drug treatment (weeks 1 and 4) and before the animals were sacrificed (week 6). First, train the mice for 48 h to adapt to the 1% sucrose (Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) solution (w/v) and avoid the preference for bottle placement: two bottles of 1% sucrose water were given each cage for 24 h adaptation, replaced one bottle of 1% sucrose water with pure water for 12 h, and then exchange the positions of the two bottles for 12 h. Next, the mice were deprived of food and water for 24 h. Then SPT was performed: two new bottles were randomly placed, filled with 1% sucrose water and pure water, respectively. The mice drank freely for 2 h, and the water bottles were weighed before and after placing them. Sucrose preference rate was calculated as follows: the intake of sucrose solution/the total amount of liquid consumed × 100%.

Forced swimming test

The forced swimming test (FST) was carried out as previously described [15]. Briefly, each mouse was individually placed in a cylindrical plastic container (25 cm height, 10 cm diameter) filled with 20 cm deep of 25 ± 1 °C water in a quiet environment and forced to swim for 6 min. Record and count the immobility time after 4 min by digital camera. After the test, each mouse was carefully dried and the equipment was rinsed with water. The time in which the mice gave up struggling to float on the water surface or only slightly swing their limbs to prevent immersion in the water was counted as immobility time.

Open field test

The open field test (OFT) was performed in accordance with previous procedure [15]. Briefly, the mice were placed individually in the center of black open box (30 cm × 30 cm × 30 cm) in a quiet environment. The box consisted of sixteen equal squares on the bottom. The experimental light source was from indoor lighting. Each mouse was free to move for 6 min. The activity of the mouse in the last 5 min were videotaped for further parameter analysis, including recording the number of crossings and rearings.

Novelty-suppressed feeding test

The novelty-suppressed feeding test (NSFT) was carried out as previously described with slight modification [16]. Briefly, the test was performed for 2 consecutive days: the first day is the adaptation period and animals were individually placed in a black open box for 10 min. After 24 h of food deprivation, three food pills were placed in the center of the open box on the second day, and then the animal was placed in a corner of the box (keeping the same position and direction each time), and test for 5 min. The latency to feed (the time from the start of the test to the first bite of the food) was observed and record. The equipment was cleaned with 10% ethanol after each test.

Sample preparation

After the last administration, the mice were sacrificed by decapitation. The blood was collected with a vacuum tube (containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) and centrifuged (4 °C, 3000 rpm, 15 min), and then the serum was stored at − 80 °C until assay. Their whole brains were quickly removed and placed in ice-cold physiological saline, the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex tissue were rapidly dissected on the ice surface and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen until assay. The intestinal contents of the cecum were rapidly collected and immediately stored by liquid nitrogen for later DNA and metabolites extraction.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) analysis

ELISA kits (Enzyme-linked Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China)were employed to measure the concentrations of serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), diamine oxidase (DAO), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). The experimental operation was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the detection was performed using a microplate reader (EnVision, PerkinElmer, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm.

Immunofluorescence staining

The mice were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 4% chloral hydrate (Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and then perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA, Chemical Industry Group Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The whole brain tissue was taken out and fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature and protected from light for 12 h, and then dehydrated in 30% sucrose at 4 °C for 48 h. The brain was sliced in the coronal plane (5 μm thick) and subjected to immunofluorescence processing according to the routine procedures in our laboratory. The primary antibody BDNF (1:400, Proteintech, USA) and Cy3-labeled fluorescent secondary antibody (1:1000; Proteintech, USA) was used. The slides were observed under a confocal microscope (LSM880, Zeiss, Germany). The image was analyzed by Image J software for optical density.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis

DNA was extracted from each intestinal content sample (n = 8 per group) using DNeasy PowerWater Kit (QIAGEN, Inc., Netherlands) following manufacturer’s protocol. The quantity and quality of extracted DNAs were measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) and agarose gel electrophoresis, respectively. Then the V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was PCR amplified using universal primers 338F and 806R [15]. The PCR amplicons were purified, quantified, and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq-PE250 platform at Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China.

16S rRNA sequences were analyzed using QIIME2 [17]. The DADA2 plugin [18] in QIIME2 was used to quality filtering, dereplicating and chimera filtering, as well as for generation of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) table and representative sequences. Then the representative sequences were assigned based on the Greengenes database 13.8 [19]. A tree was next generated, using the align-to-tree-mafft-fasttree command, and Alpha diversity were produced by QIIME2 core-metrics-phylogenetic pipeline.

Metabolite extraction and UPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis

The extraction and analysis of intestinal contents metabolites (n = 8 per group) was assisted by the Beijing Allwegene Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The metabolomics separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH Amide column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 25 mM ammonium acetate and 25 mM ammonium hydroxide in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The following mobile phase gradient is: 95% B, 0.5 min; 95–65% B, 0.5–7 min; 65–40% B, 7–8 min; 40% B, 9 min; 40–95% B, 9–9.1 min; and 95% B, 12 min. The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min. Injection volume was 2 µL and the column temperature was maintained at 30 °C. Mass spectrometry was carried out on the UPLC-Q-TOF-MS (Triple TOF 5600+, SCIEX, USA) through an electrospray ionization (ESI) source operated in positive and negative modes. The MS conditions were set as follows: ion spray voltage: ± 5500 V; ion gas temperature: 650 °C; ion gas pressure: 60 psi; curtain gas: 30 psi; declustered voltage: 60 V. The measurement procedures, acquisition and processing of UPLC-Q-TOF-MS are described in previous studies [20, 21].

Statistical analysis

16S rRNA gene sequence data analysis: the Kruskal–Wallis test was carried out to compare the differences in alpha diversity between pairs of groups, including Chao 1, Faith’s Phylogenetic diversity, and Shannon, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test with correction via Bonferroni. Then beta diversity was calculated based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 999 permutations was preformed to assess differences in beta diversity using adonis() function in vegan package [22]. The P values for multiple comparisons were corrected using Bonferroni correction. The taxonomic changes at the phylum and genus levels between different groups were visualized as column plots by Metastats [23]. Further, linear discriminant Analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) was implemented to identify different ASVs among different treatment groups.

Metabolomics data analysis: Standardized metabolomics data were fed to R package metaX for principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). The metabolites with VIP (Variable Importance in the Projection) > 1 and p < 0.05 (student t test) were considered as significantly changed metabolites. In addition, MetaboAnalyst 3.0 ( was used to conduct pathway enrichment analysis for the resulting significant differential metabolites and KEGG ( was used to identify related pathways of differential metabolites.

Spearman correlation analysis was used to explore the correlations between depression-related indicators and gut-related indicators, as well as brain-related indicators and gut-related indicators in mice.

Statistical analysis of the remaining data: All data were expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for data processing. The p values for multiple comparisons were corrected using Bonferroni correction.


Matrine treatment alleviated the depression-like behavior and promoted the release of monoamine neurotransmitter in CUMS-induced mice

After four weeks of CUMS induction, mice were given different concentrations of matrine by gavage for 2 weeks. Body weight, behavioral tests (SPT, FST, OFT, and NSFT), and the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters were next conducted to examine the antidepressant effect of matrine. As illustrated in Additional file 1: Fig. S1, after 4 weeks of CUMS induction, the sucrose preference rate of mice was significantly reduced in the 4th week (padj = 9.52e−04), indicating that the CUMS modeling was successful. Meanwhile, 30 mg/kg (padj = 8.94e−04) and 60 mg/kg (padj = 0.03) instead of 15 mg/kg matrine significantly increased the reduction of sucrose preference in the 6th week (ANOVA: SPT, F = 17.36, df = 5, p = 5.01e−06). Combined with the results of previous studies [14], 30 mg/kg was finally selected as the optimal dose of matrine for subsequent experiments.

As shown in Fig. 1B–G, body weight gain, anhedonia, behavioral despair, and exploratory ability of mice induced by CUMS for 6 weeks undergone major changes, which are reflected in the reduction of body weight gain (padj = 8.78e−04) and sucrose preference rate (padj = 6.71e−04), the prolonged FST immobility time (padj = 0.009), the reduction of OFT crossings (padj = 7.91e−04) and rearings (padj = 9.81e−04) number, and the prolongation of NSFT latency (padj = 8.33e−04). However, after treatment with imipramine or matrine, the aforementioned depression-like symptoms were improved with statistical significance (ANOVA: BW, F = 9.16, df = 3, p = 0.0002; FST, F = 9.32, df = 3, p = 0.0002; OFT crossings, F = 8.63, df = 3, p = 0.0006; OFT rearings, F = 10.42, df = 3, p = 9.02e−05; NFST, F = 12.53, df = 3, p = 8.25e−05). It suggests that two weeks of matrine treatment could alleviate depressive-like behaviors of mice.

Depression induced by stress is not only manifested in depression-like behaviors, but also closely related to low levels of monoamine neurotransmitters (5-HT, NE, and DA). The relative content of monoamine neurotransmitters has been used as an important indicator for evaluating depression [24]. Thus, the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters (5-HT, NE, and DA) in the serum were detected. The results are shown in Fig. 1H, CUMS exposure significantly reduced (padj = 0.006, padj = 9.17e−04, and padj = 0.007) the levels of monoamine neurotransmitters in the serum of mice, while treatment with imipramine (padj = 0.04, padj = 0.006, and padj = 0.03) or matrine (padj = 0.03, padj = 0.008, and padj = 0.02) almost reversed the decreasing trend (ANOVA: 5-HT, F = 5.203, df = 3, p = 0.004; NE, F = 10.29, df = 3, p = 9.14e−05; DA, F = 5.12, df = 3, p = 0.005) suggesting that matrine restored the CUMS-induced the decrease of monoamine neurotransmitters levels, which was beneficial to the improvement of depression in mice.

Matrine modulated the gut microbiota composition in depression-like mice induced by CUMS

To explore the effect of matrine, which can improve depression, on gut microbiota, 16S rRNA sequencing analysis was performed on the microbes in the cecal contents of mice. We compared the alpha diversity and found that there was no significant difference between each pair of groups (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Further analysis of beta diversity, PCoA revealed that samples were largely separated by groups, which means that the gut microbiota in different treatment groups were significantly different, except for between matrine group and control group (PERMANOVA: Con-CUMS: F = 3.47, padj = 0.012; CUMS-CUMS + IMI: F = 2.74, padj = 0.006; CUMS-CUMS + MA: F = 4.31, padj = 0.006; Con-CUMS + MA: F = 1.62, padj = 0.144; Fig. 2A). Consistently, UPGMA clustering further indicated differences between CUMS and CUMS + IMI groups branching away from Con and CUMS + MA groups, while Con and CUMS + MA groups clustered together (Fig. 2B). The above results indicated that the effect of matrine on the gut microbiota of CUMS-induced mice was closer to that of the control group.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The diversity and composition of gut microbiota in different groups. A Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of beta diversity in different groups by Bray-Curtis distance. Percentages of variance explained by first two axes explain were provided, accounting for 18.2% and 8.8%, respectively. B Unweighted pair group-method with arithmetic means (UPGMA) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices. Groups with different letters are significantly different according to PERMANOVA (padj < 0.05). C Taxonomic tree in packed circles. The circles represent phylum, class, order, family, and genus from outside to inside. The abundance of each ASV in the different treatment groups is displayed as a pie chart. D Relative abundances of the top ten ASVs at the phylum level. E Relative abundances of the top ten ASVs at the genus level. F Cladogram showed ASVs with LDA scores greater than 2 based on linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis

The mean relative abundance profiles of gut microbiota composition in each group as overview is shown in Fig. 2C. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria were the most abundant phyla in all groups, accounting for more than 90% of the total bacterial community (Fig. 2D). At genus level, compared with the control group, the relative abundances of Lactobacillus and Allobaculum were significantly decreased in the CUMS group, accompanied by a significantly increased in the relative abundances of Rikenella and Odoribacter (all padj = 0.02; Fig. 2E). Compared with the CUMS group, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus (padj = 8.16e−04) in the matrine treatment group was increased, while the relative abundance of Helicobacter, Rikenella, Odoribacter, and Ruminococcus was significantly decreased (all padj = 0.03). Notably, among the microbiota with significant changes at the level of the top 10 genera in relative abundance, Lactobacillus, Allobaculum, Turicibacter, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus are gram-positive bacteria, while Oscillospira, Helicobacter, Rikenella, Odoribacter, and Desulfovibrio are gram-negative bacteria. The CUMS procedure reduced the total relative abundance of Gram-positive bacteria by more than 50%, while the relative abundance of all Gram-negative bacteria was up-regulated. However, this situation was reversed by matrine treatment, indicating that matrine treatment modulated the gut microbiota composition in CUMS-induced depression mice.

Based on LEfSe, ASVs driving differences in gut microbiota composition between different treatment groups were analyzed. A total of 27 differences ASVs among the four groups were identified (LDA > 2.0), of which 11 were at the genus level (Fig. 2F). The results showed that the different ASVs at the genus level were concentrated in the CUMS group. In detail, the relative abundances of Odoribacter, Rikenella, Lactococcus, Streptococcus, Anaerotruncus, Clostridium, CC-115, and Helicobacter in CUMS group were significantly different from those in other groups. Lactobacillus and Denitromonas were the most abundant in matrine group. The dominant ASV in the control group was Allobaculum. After analysis, it was found that the differential ASVs in LEfSe (top 50 at the genus level) are Odoribacter, Rikenella, Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Anaerotruncus, Clostridium, Allobaculum, Denitromonas, Helicobacter. The changes in the composition and abundance of the above-mentioned mice gut microbiota among the different groups are especially shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S3.

Matrine attenuates gut metabolite disturbances and metabolic pathway changes in CUMS-induced mice

Alters in the composition of gut microbes will lead to changes in gut metabolites [8], then the effect of matrine on gut metabolites was further explored. First, principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to analyze the metabolites of the control group, the CUMS group and the matrine group, and the results demonstrated that there were clear differences between the three groups (Fig. 3A, B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The composition and difference of gut metabolites in different groups, and the analysis of metabolic pathways. A, B The PCA and OPLS-DA analysis of control group, CUMS model group and matrine treatment group. C, E The VIP value plots of the differential metabolites (the top 20 of VIP value). D, F The plot of KEGG differential metabolic pathway (the top 20 hits number of metabolic pathways)

To find the differential metabolites between the groups, a combination of VIP > 1 and p < 0.05 was screened in the OPLS-DA. After comparing the control group and the CUMS group, the top 20 differential metabolites with VIP values were selected for display (Fig. 3C). Compared with the control group, the contents of 4 differential metabolites in the CUMS group were significantly increased, while the contents of 16 differential metabolites decreased significantly. Similarly, the differential metabolites in the top 20 VIP values between the CUMS model group and the matrine-treated group were shown in Fig. 3E. Compared with the model group, the contents of 16 differential metabolites increased significantly after matrine treatment, and the contents of 4 metabolites including histamine decreased significantly. Notably, histamine is closely related to the occurrence of inflammation, and the enriched metabolic pathway is inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels [25]. Excitingly, in Additional file 1: Table S2, we found that after matrine treatment, the change trend of differential metabolites except Glu-Val-Arg, Trp(O)-Ile, UDP-d-galactose, PyroGlu-Trp-Arg, Thr-Gly-Lys, Phe-Phe, and Ser-Thr-Lys can be reversed. It reflects that matrine reversed most of the changes in gut metabolites in CUMS-induced depression mice.

In addition to the top 20 differential metabolites in the VIP value, we found 7 differential metabolites related to amino acid metabolism: l-phenylalanine, l-tyrosine, l-tryptophan, serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), dopamine (DA), and l-glutamine. l-Phenylalanine can be converted into l-tyrosine, and then into NE and DA [26]. l-Tryptophan is the synthetic precursor of 5-HT, and its relative content in the intestine is negatively correlated with intestinal inflammation [27, 28]. In addition to reducing intestinal permeability, l-glutamine can also reduce inflammation and form a strong intestinal barrier [29]. As shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S4, compared with the control group, the levels of the 7 metabolites in the model group showed a decreasing trend. This trend of amino acid disorders was reversed after matrine treatment, confirming the positive regulation of matrine on monoamine neurotransmitters, and implying the possibility of intestinal permeability destruction and inflammation.

Furthermore, to understand the underlying molecular functions of the gut differential metabolites, metabolic pathway analysis was conducted. Figure 3D, F show the differential metabolic pathways (top 20 hits) between the control group and the CUMS group, and the CUMS group and the matrine group, respectively. Among them, there are 14 identical metabolic pathways, namely: ABC transporters; biosynthesis of amino acids; pyrimidine metabolism; neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction; aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis; protein digestion and absorption; galactose metabolism; vitamin digestion and absorption; central carbon metabolism in cancer; mineral absorption; alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism; arginine biosynthesis; synaptic vesicle cycle; and prolactin signaling pathway. It is suggested that matrine restores most of the abnormal metabolic pathways caused by CUMS.

To explore the correlation between depression-related indicators and gut-related indicators, Spearman correlation analysis was performed on gut metabolites, gut microbiota, and depression-like behaviors (Additional file 1: Fig. S5). We found significant correlations between the above indicators, suggesting that the ameliorating effect of matrine on depressive-like behaviors in CUMS-induced mice involves modulation and restoration of gut microbiota and metabolites. However, the probable related mechanisms of matrine affecting the gut microbiota and metabolites in the treatment of depression need to be further confirmed.

Matrine reduced the intestinal permeability marker and lowered the levels of LPS in depression-like mice induced by CUMS

Since CUMS induced the increase of Gram-negative bacteria (such as Odoribacter, Rikenella, Helicobacter, etc.) in the gut of mice, as well as altered amino acids and their metabolites (such as l-tryptophan, histamine, l-glutamine, etc.), which are closely related to intestinal barrier damage and intestinal inflammation [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Subsequent ELISA results of DAO, a marker of intestinal permeability in serum, confirmed that the relative content of DAO (Fig. 4A, padj = 0.04) in the CUMS group was significantly higher than that in the control group, suggesting that the intestinal permeability of CUMS-induced mice is increased. Since LPS is an important component of gram-negative bacteria, the relative level of LPS was tested. The results of LPS in serum showed that LPS in the CUMS group was significantly increased compared with the control group (Fig. 4B, padj = 5.68e−04), indicating that mice in the CUMS group may have intestinal inflammation and then release LPS into the blood. However, matrine treatment reversed the increase in DAO (padj = 0.03 and padj = 0.006) and LPS (padj = 7.42e−04 and padj = 5.13e−04) level (ANOVA: DAO, F = 5.76, df = 3, p = 0.003; LPS, F = 19.87, df = 3, p = 3.25e−06), indicating that matrine has anti-inflammatory effects, which in turn restores intestinal permeability and the relative level of LPS.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The levels of DAO, LPS, and pro-inflammatory cytokines in different groups. AC The relative levels of DAO, LPS, and pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum. D, E The relative levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). *padj < 0.05, **padj < 0.01, ***padj < 0.001 versus the control group (Con); #padj < 0.05, ##padj < 0.01, ###padj < 0.001 versus the CUMS group

Matrine lowered the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood circulation and specific brain regions in depression-like mice induced by CUMS

Next, we further tested the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in serum and specific brain regions (prefrontal cortex and hippocampus). In the serum, as displayed in Fig. 4C, CUMS procedure significantly increased the relative levels of IL-1β (padj = 0.008), IL-6 (padj = 5.42e−04), and TNF-α (padj =6.35e−04) compared with the control group. Matrine reversed the increase in IL-1β (padj = 8.83e−04), IL-6 (padj = 0.007), and TNF-α (padj = 0.006) compared with the CUMS model group (ANOVA: IL-1β, F = 11.02, df = 3, p = 8.51e−05; IL-6, F = 8.94, df = 3, p = 0.0003; TNF-α, F = 8.86, df = 3, p = 0.0005). Additionally, the relative content of pro-inflammatory cytokines was also measured in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus of mice, and the trend was similar to that in the serum. As shown in Fig. 4D, E, the relative levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in the prefrontal cortex (padj = 0.03, padj = 0.02, and padj = 0.005) and hippocampus (padj = 7.29e−04, padj = 0.02, and padj = 4.37e−04) of the CUMS group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Matrine decreased the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the prefrontal cortex (padj = 0.003, padj = 0.002, and padj = 0.007) and hippocampus (padj = 0.003, padj = 0.04, and padj = 0.008) (ANOVA: Prefrontal cortex: IL-1β, F = 5.24, df = 3, p = 0.004; IL-6, F = 6.20, df = 3, p = 0.002; TNF-α, F = 7.14, df = 3, p = 0.001; Hippocampus: IL-1β, F = 8.19, df = 3, p = 0.0003; IL-6, F = 5.29, df = 3, p = 0.004; TNF-α, chi-squared = 9.41, df = 3, p = 0.0002), indicating that matrine alleviates the inflammation of peripheral blood circulation and specific brain regions caused by CUMS.

Matrine reversed the reduction of BDNF levels in the specific brain regions of CUMS-induced mice

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a major member of the neurotrophin family, is one of the brain indicators of depression research. Depressive states, including elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the brain, have been reported to be accompanied by down-regulation of BDNF expression in the brain [37, 38]. Therefore, BDNF levels in specific brain regions (prefrontal cortex and hippocampus) were examined. As illustrated in Fig. 5B, E, CUMS-induced group significantly reduced BDNF levels in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in mice (padj = 3.97e−04 and padj = 5.79e−04). Meanwhile, the imipramine (padj = 0.03 and padj = 7.82e−04) and matrine (padj = 0.02 and padj = 0.04) treatment groups significantly increased BDNF levels in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus compared with the CUMS group (ANOVA: Prefrontal cortex, F = 9.04, df = 3, p = 0.0002; Hippocampus, F = 18.53, df = 3, p = 7.36e−06).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The relative levels of BDNF protein expression in different groups. A Immunofluorescence images of BDNF (red) and DAPI (blue) in the prefrontal cortex. The merged image is displayed in the right panel. Bar = 50 μm. B The relative levels of BDNF in prefrontal cortex in ELISA assay. C The average fluorescence intensity of BDNF in prefrontal cortex in A. D Immunofluorescence image of BDNF (red) and DAPI (blue) in the CA1 region of hippocampal. Bar = 200 μm. E The relative levels of BDNF in hippocampus in ELISA assay. F The average fluorescence intensity of BDNF in prefrontal cortex in FIGURE D. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). *padj < 0.05, ***padj < 0.001 versus the control group (Con); #padj < 0.05, ##padj < 0.01, ###padj < 0.001 versus the CUMS group

Next, we further confirmed the expression level of BDNF in prefrontal cortex (Fig. 5A, C) and hippocampus (Fig. 5D, F) by immunofluorescence, which obtained consistent results. It was observed that the number of BDNF-positive cells and average fluorescence intensity in the prefrontal cortex (padj = 8.43e−04) and hippocampus (padj = 0.03) of mice exposed to CUMS for 6 weeks was significantly reduced compared to that of the control group, while CUMS mice treated with imipramine (padj = 0.02, padj = 0.007) or matrine (padj =0.003, padj = 0.02) showed a significant increase in the number of BDNF-positive cells and average fluorescence intensity (ANOVA: Prefrontal cortex, F = 8.97, df = 3, p = 0.0003; Hippocampus, F = 5.31, df = 3, p = 0.004). It indicates that matrine reduces the negative effect of CUMS on the relative content of BDNF, which is manifested in promoting the expression of BDNF protein in mice induced by CUMS.

Correlation analysis between the related indicators of gut and brain in mice

Spearman correlation analysis was carried out to evaluate the association among differential gut microbiota, differential gut metabolites, pro-inflammatory cytokines in specific brain regions (prefrontal cortex and hippocampus), and the expression levels of BDNF in specific brain regions. Gut microbiota was selected in the top 10 of the genus level and differences in LEfSe, and the differential metabolites were selected in the top 10 of Fig. 3C, E. As shown in Fig. 6, the level of BDNF in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus displayed a positive correlation with the abundance of Lactobacillus and Allobaculum, and a negative correlation with the abundance of Helicobacter, Rikenella, and Odoribacter. The levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus showed negatively correlated with the abundance of Lactobacillus and Allobaculum, and positively correlated with the abundance of Helicobacter, Rikenella, and Odoribacter. The level of BDNF in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus was positively correlated with the content of Cellobiose, Glu-Gly-Arg, N-(2-acetamido) iminodiacetic acid, Glu-Val-Arg, N6, N6, N6-trimethyl-l-lysine, Trp(O)-Ile, 4-Pyridoxic acid, Gln-Trp-Arg, PyroGlu-Trp-Lys, Met-Val-Lys, Ser-Asn-Lys, His-Met-Arg, and PyroGlu-Trp-Arg, while negatively correlated with the content of 4-Morpholinopropanesulfonic acid Acamprosate, Acamprostate, (N-(-2-Acetamido))-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, l-Citrulline, Pyridoxal, and Acetyl phosphate. What’s more, the relationship between the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus and the above-mentioned differential metabolites is just the opposite of the relationship between BDNF and the above-mentioned differential metabolites. Collectively, the correlation analysis results further provided the relationship between the related indicators of gut and brain, indicating that matrine improves CUMS-induced depression in mice via “gut–brain” communication.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Spearman correlation between the related indicators of gut and brain. Axis label: red, BDNF and pro-inflammatory cytokines in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus; blue, gut microbiota; black, gut metabolites. Numbers on the lower left area: value of correlation coefficient; symbols on the upper right area: results of correlation and significance test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001


Previous evidence has shown that matrine possesses anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, antiviral, antimicrobial, and neuro-protective properties. However, large doses of alkaloids have significant hepatotoxic and neurotoxic properties, which somewhat limit their clinical application. The dose of matrine selected in our study was within its safe dose range in vivo (10–160 mg/kg), which adequately avoided its toxicity [39, 40]. In the current study, to clarify the antidepressant effect of matrine, we established an animal model combining CUMS with separation to simulate human depression caused by long-term low-intensity stress [41], and successfully established a mouse depression model, as evidenced by four behavioral tests (SPT, FST, OFT, and NSFT) and the detection of monoamine neurotransmitters (5-HT, NE, and DA) in serum. Here, the four behavioral tests were used to evaluate the anhedonia, behavioral despair, exercise and exploration ability, and appetite in mice.

Studies have shown that long-term stress can lead to the imbalance of gut microbiota, whereas the classic antidepressant can alleviate the altered gut microbiota [42]. Depression-like behaviors in depression model mice exposed to stress are also related to changes in gut microbial composition [43, 44]. In our study, the structure of gut microbiota in the CUMS model group indeed changed significantly, manifested in the significant increase in the relative abundance of Odoribacter, Rikenella, Streptococcus, Anaerotruncus, Clostridium, and Helicobacter, however the trend was reversed after matrine treatment. It is known that the relative abundance of Odoribacter increases significantly after chronic and unpredictable mild stimulation [45]. Odoribacter in the intestine is significantly negatively correlated with brain BDNF and the levels of tight junction proteins in the brain and intestine [30, 31] and is significantly positively correlated with the levels of inflammatory cytokines in the brain and intestine, as well as the pro-inflammatory state of several metabolic and autoimmune diseases [30, 46, 47]. Rikenella is significantly negatively correlated with intestinal tight junction proteins (such as occludin and e-cadherin) and positively correlated with inflammatory cytokines, which is related to the intestinal mucosal barrier and the degree of inflammation [32,33,34]. Well, it was found that the relative abundance of Streptococcus and Clostridium in the intestine of major depressive disorder was significantly higher than normal person [48, 49]. Streptococcus belongs to the inflammation-promoting bacteria, and the increase in its relative abundance induces intestinal inflammation [50]. Anaerotruncus is positively correlated with anxiety and has been reported to increase in the feces of stressed animals, and increased in the feces of mice with intestinal barrier dysfunction [51, 52]. What’s more, it is reported that Helicobacter infection may cause glial to produce inflammatory products and affect the production of neurotrophic factors [53]. At the genus level, the abundance of Helicobacter in mice transplanted with fecal microbiota of depression-like mice was more significant than that in other groups [54]. Additionally, Lactobacillus is a differential microbiota in the control group (Fig. 2F). As we all know, genus Lactobacillus is one kind of probiotics in the intestinal, which is beneficial to alleviate intestinal inflammation and improve various neurological diseases [55,56,57,58]. In general, we observed that most of the significantly increased microbiota in the CUMS group have been confirmed to be positively related to inflammation and neurological diseases, especially depression and anxiety. However, matrine modulated and restored the composition of the gut microbiota associated with inflammation in depressed mice, suggesting that matrine mediates the regulation of intestinal microbes to improve depression-like behaviors.

As a systematic research method, metabolomics directly reflects the changes in the biochemical process and state of the body, plays a role in the identification and confirmation of pharmacological and disease models, and better captures the changes in endogenous metabolites caused by drugs [59]. Consistent with expectations, the CUMS procedure caused significant changes in most metabolites (Fig. 3C, E). From this, we further predict the metabolic pathways that it may participate in and affect. After analysis, we found that there are 4 metabolic pathways that are closely related to the treatment of depression, namely ABC transporters, biosynthetic of amino acids, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and synaptic vesicle cycle. ABC transporters have been reported to be associated with depression. In fact, some ABC transporters are distributed throughout the brain and participate in the blood-brain barrier to regulate the inflow or outflow of various metabolites [60]. It is worth noting that in the shared metabolic pathways in Fig. 3D, F, the biosynthetic of amino acids has a higher impact. In addition, there are also changes in aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, arginine biosynthesis, alanine, and aspartate and glutamate metabolism, which once again verify that the intestinal amino acid metabolism disorders are closely related to the pathophysiology of depression [61, 62]. In addition, the up-regulation of neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction contributes to the recovery of depression induced by CUMS. Notably, from the results, the up-regulation of the neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction pathway is beneficial to compensate for the low synaptic vesicle cycle, thereby promoting the release of neurotransmitters to improve CUMS-induced depression [63]. These reports coincide with our experimental results and also provide a theoretical basis for revealing the antidepressant mechanism of matrine. Therefore, we speculate that the CUMS procedure caused the dysfunction of amino acid metabolism in mice. While Matrine treatment alleviates the metabolic disorders and related symptoms caused by CUMS procedure via multiple metabolic pathways, thereby improving depression.

Anyway, our study confirmed that significant changes in a variety of amino acids and their metabolites are related to the intestinal barrier and inflammation. In view of the above results, we believe that it is necessary to further investigate the effect of matrine on indicators that reflect intestinal inflammation and permeability. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a component of Gram-negative bacteria that can induce the production of IL-1β by binding to CD14 Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4), and then IL-1β stimulates the production of other pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as TNF-α and IL-6), which in turn promotes the occurrence of intestinal inflammation and destroys the intestinal barrier, resulting in increased intestinal permeability [64]. The decrease in intestinal barrier function is accompanied by an increase in DAO, a marker of intestinal permeability [65]. Thus, the relative levels of DAO, LPS were tested. Additionally, pro-inflammatory cytokines can pass through the blood-brain barrier by second messengers or endothelial cells to carry out bidirectional communication between the central nervous system and the periphery [66]. Therefore, we next tested the relative levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in prefrontal cortex and hippocampus, as well as in the serum of mice. It was found that matrine can restore intestinal permeability and intestinal barrier function, regulates the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the intestine and peripheral blood circulation, and relieves the inflammatory damage of the specific brain regions. This result is inseparable from the anti-inflammatory effect of matrine and its regulation of gut microbiota such as Lactobacillus.

Notably, in depression model mice, elevated levels of pro-inflammatory factors in the brain lead to impaired release of neurotrophic factors [67, 68]. Moreover, neuroinflammation promotes the down-regulation of BDNF expression in depressed patients and depression model animals [37, 38]. BDNF is one of the main members of the neurotrophic factor family, which is essential for neurogenesis and the pathogenesis of depression [69, 70]. In our research, the effect of matrine on BDNF is indeed opposite to that of pro-inflammatory factors, which suggests that the antidepressant mechanism of matrine involves ultimate upregulation of BDNF protein expression via regulating inflammatory factors. Furthermore, spearman correlation analysis corroborates the experimental results and further supports that matrine improves depression-like behaviors through “gut–brain” regulation. However, the causality of the bidirectional “gut–brain” communication has not been confirmed. In the next step, we will conduct a fecal microbiota transplantation experiment to verify the causal relationship of matrine to improve depression through “gut–brain” regulation, which is important to further explore its antidepressant mechanism. In addition, matrine is known to exhibit neuroprotective effects by inhibiting neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in various neurological disorders [71]. Moreover, it is able to regulate mitochondrial function and intercellular communication through multiple signaling pathways [72,73,74,75,76]. In the future, we will study in depth the direct targets and related molecular mechanisms of the antidepressant effects of matrine and further explore the possibility that oxidative stress and intercellular communication are involved in “gut–brain” communication to exert antidepressant effects.


In conclusion, our research confirmed that matrine can regulate the composition of the gut microbiota and the disturbance of gut metabolites, restore intestinal permeability, reduce peripheral blood circulation and neuroinflammation, and increase the expression of BDNF protein, thereby effectively alleviating depression-like behaviors in CUMS-induced mice. This study provides a basis for exploring the mechanism of matrine to improve depression through the “microbiota–gut–brain” axis, and provides a new direction for matrine in the treatment of depression. Our future work will carry out fecal microbiota transplantation experiments to verify the causal relationship of matrine improving depression through “gut–brain” regulation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository and accession number(s) can be found below:, SRP329538.



Chronic unpredictable mild stress


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Brain-derived neurotrophic factor








Diamine oxidase








Tumor necrosis factor-α


Body weight


Sucrose preference test


Forced swimming test


Open field test


Novelty-suppressed feeding test


  1. Jiang N, Wang HX, Li CC, Zeng GR, Lv JW, Wang Q, et al. The antidepressant-like effects of the water extract of Panax ginseng and Polygala tenuifolia are mediated via the BDNF-TrkB signaling pathway and neurogenesis in the hippocampus. J Ethnopharmacol. 2021;267:113625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang S, Wu XL, Hu X, Wang T, Jin F. Recognizing depression from the microbiota–gut–brain axis. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Foster JA, Neufeld KM. Gut–brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:305–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang HY, Ling ZX, Zhang YH, Mao HJ, Ma ZP, Yin Y, et al. Altered fecal microbiota composition in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;48:186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Winter G, Hart RA, Charlesworth RPG, Sharpley CF. Gut microbiome and depression: what we know and what we need to know. Rev Neurosci. 2018;29:629–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng P, Zeng B, Zhou C, Liu M, Fang Z, Xu X, et al. Gut microbiome remodeling induces depressive-like behaviors through a pathway mediated by the host’s metabolism. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:786–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fond G, Boukouaci W, Chevalier G, Regnault A, Eberl G, Hamdani N, et al. The “psychomicrobiotic”: targeting microbiota in major psychiatric disorders: a systematic review. Pathol Biol. 2015;63:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng Y, Gao XX, Meng MD, Xue HH, Qin XM. Multi-omics reveals the mechanisms of antidepressant-like effects of the low polarity fraction of Bupleuri Radix. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;256:112806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burokas A, Arboleya S, Moloney RD, Peterson VL, Murphy K, Clarke G, et al. Targeting the microbiota–gut–brain axis: prebiotics have anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects and reverse the impact of chronic stress in mice. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:472–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hao ZK, Wang W, Guo R, Liu H. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (ATCC 27766) has preventive and therapeutic effects on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depression-like and anxiety-like behavior in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;104:132–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yan TX, Wang NZ, Liu B, Wu B, Xiao F, He BS, et al. Schisandra chinensis ameliorates depressive-like behaviors by regulating microbiota–gut–brain axis via its anti-inflammation activity. Phyther Res. 2020;35:289–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kan QC, Zhang S, Xu YM, Zhang GX, Zhu L. Matrine regulates glutamate-related excitotoxic factors in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Neurosci Lett. 2014;560:92–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gong SS, Li YX, Zhang MT, Du J, Ma PS, Yao WX, et al. Neuroprotective effect of matrine in mouse model of vincristine-induced neuropathic pain. Neurochem Res. 2016;41:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu ZH, You ZC, Chen P, Chen C, Chen F, Shen JH, et al. Matrine exerts antidepressant-like effects on mice: role of the hippocampal PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2018;21:764–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang M, Li AQ, Yang QF, Li JY, Wang LH, Liu XX, et al. Beneficial effect of alkaloids from Sophora alopecuroides L. on CUMS induced depression model mice via modulating gut microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:665159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Tian SJ, Wang HL, Wang YY, Du CB, Fang JY, et al. Protection of hUC-MSCs against neuronal complement C3a receptor-mediated NLRP3 activation in CUMS-induced mice. Neurosci Lett. 2021;741:135485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. QIIME 2: reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. Peer J. 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Callahan BJ, Mcmurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Andersen GL. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5069–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ma Q, Li PL, Hua YL, Ji P, Yao WL, Zhang XS, et al. Effects of Tao-Hong-Si Wu decoction on acute blood stasis in rats based on a LC-Q/TOF-MS metabolomics and network approach. Biomed Chromatogr. 2018;32:e4144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng J, Zhang J, Guo Y, Cui H, Lin A, Hu B, et al. Improvement on metabolic syndrome in high fat diet-induced obese mice through modulation of gut microbiota by sangguayin decoction. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;246:112225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. 2019.

  23. White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M. Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu QH, Mouri A, Yang Y, Kunisawa K, Teshigawara T, Hirakawa M, et al. Chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced behavioral changes are coupled with dopaminergic hyperfunction and serotonergic hypofunction in mouse models of depression. Behav Brain Res. 2019;372:112053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwab D, Hahn EG, Raithel M. Enhanced histamine metabolism: a comparative analysis of collagenous colitis and food allergy with respect to the role of diet and nsaid use. Inflamm Res. 2003;52:142–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fernstrom JD, Fernstrom MH. Tyrosine, phenylalanine, and catecholamine synthesis and function in the brain. J Nutr. 2007;137:1539S-1547S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain–gut–microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lavelle A, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17:223–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rapin JR, Wiernsperger N. Possible links between intestinal permeablity and food processing: a potential therapeutic niche for glutamine. Clinics. 2010;65:635–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jiang YS, Liu Y, Gao MQ, Xue ML, Wang ZL, Liang H. Nicotinamide riboside alleviates alcohol-induced depression-like behaviours in C57BL/6J mice by altering the intestinal microbiota associated with microglial activation and BDNF expression. Food Funct. 2020;11:378–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Geng SH, Yang LP, Cheng F, Zhang ZM, Li JB, Liu WB, et al. Gut microbiota are associated with psychological stress-induced defections in intestinal and blood–brain barriers. Front Microbiol. 2020;10:3067.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Shi HJ, Chang YG, Gao Y, Wang X, Chen X, Wang YM, et al. Dietary fucoidan of Acaudina molpadioides alters gut microbiota and mitigates intestinal mucosal injury induced by cyclophosphamide. Food Funct. 2017;8:3383–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miranda-Ribera A, Ennamorati M, Serena G, Cetinbas M, Lan J, Sadreyev RI, et al. Exploiting the zonulin mouse model to establish the role of primary impaired gut barrier function on microbiota composition and immune profiles. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Sang HZ, Xie Y, Su X, Zhang MD, Zhang YJ, Liu K, et al. Mushroom bulgaria inquinans modulates host immunological response and gut microbiota in mice. Front Nutr. 2020;7:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Weller C, Oxlade N, Dobbs SM, Dobbs RJ, Charlett A, Bjarnason IT. Role of inflammation in gastrointestinal tract in aetiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic parkinsonism. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005;44:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schwab D, Hahn EG, Raithel M. Enhanced histamine metabolism: a comparative analysis of collagenous colitis and food allergy with respect to the role of diet and nsaid use. Inflamm Res. 2003;52(4):142–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang WT, Zhang J, Hong LY, Huang WB, Dai XM, Ye QY, et al. Metformin ameliorates stress-induced depression-like behaviors via enhancing the expression of BDNF by activating AMPK/CREB-mediated histone acetylation. J Affect Disord. 2020;260:302–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang N, Lv JW, Wang HX, Lu C, Wang Q, Xia TJ, et al. Dammarane sapogenins alleviates depression-like behaviours induced by chronic social defeat stress in mice through the promotion of the BDNF signalling pathway and neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Brain Res Bull. 2019;153:239–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. You LT, Yang CJ, Du YY, Wang WP, Sun MY, Liu J, et al. A systematic review of the pharmacology, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of matrine. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:01067.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Eftekhari A, Hasanzadeh A, Khalilov R, Hosainzadegan H, Ahmadian E, Eghbal MA. Hepatoprotective role of berberine against paraquat-induced liver toxicity in rat. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:4969–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wen GH, Yao H, Li YN, Ding RT, Ren XH, Tan YQ, et al. Regulation of tau protein on the antidepressant effects of ketamine in the chronic unpredictable mild stress model. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun LJ, Zhang HH, Cao Y, Wang CC, Zhao CH, Wang HN, et al. Fluoxetine ameliorates dysbiosis in a depression model induced by chronic unpredicted mild stress in mice. Int J Med Sci. 2019;16:1260–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Dash S, Clarke G, Berk M, Jacka FN. The gut microbiome and diet in psychiatry: focus on depression. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28:1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Melancholic microbes: a link between gut microbiota and depression? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:713–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Li JG, Jia XY, Wang C, Wu CX, Qin XM. Altered gut metabolome contributes to depression-like behaviors in rats exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9:40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu YY, Li T, Alim A, Ren DY, Zhao Y, Yang XB. Regulatory effects of stachyose on colonic and hepatic inflammation, gut microbiota dysbiosis, and peripheral CD4+ T cell distribution abnormality in high-fat diet-fed mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:11665–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Quagliariello A, Del Chierico F, Russo A, Reddel S, Conte G, Lopetuso LR, et al. Gut microbiota profiling and gut–brain crosstalk in children affected by pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome and pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Cheung SG, Goldenthal AR, Uhlemann AC, Mann JJ, Miller JM, Sublette ME. Systematic review of gut microbiota and major depression. Front Psychiatry. 2019;10:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Rong H, Xie XH, Zhao J, Lai WT, Wang MB, Xu D, et al. Similarly in depression, nuances of gut microbiota: evidences from a shotgun metagenomics sequencing study on major depressive disorder versus bipolar disorder with current major depressive episode patients. J Psychiatr Res. 2019;113:90–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Yong SJ, Tong T, Chew J, Lim WL. Antidepressive mechanisms of probiotics and their therapeutic potential. Front NeuroSci. 2019;13:1361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Johannes P, Camille F, Marija D, Lukas K, Bettina K, Clemens D, et al. Amicrobial signature of psychological distress in irritable bowel syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2018;80:1.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Qian YW, Yang XD, Xu SQ, Wu CY, Song YY, Qin N, et al. Alteration of the fecal microbiota in Chinese patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;70:194–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Welle C, Oxlade N, Dobbs SM, Dobbs RJ, Charlett A, Bjarnason IT. Role of inflammation in gastrointestinal tract in aetiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic parkinsonism. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2005;44:129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pu YY, Tan YF, Qu YG, Chang LJ, Wang SM, Wei Y, et al. A role of the subdiaphragmatic vagus nerve in depression-like phenotypes in mice after fecal microbiota transplantation from Chrna7 knock-out mice with depression-like phenotypes. Brain Behav Immun. 2021;94:318–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sireswar S, Dey G, Biswas S. Influence of fruit-based beverages on efficacy of lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) against DSS-induced intestinal inflammation. Food Res Int. 2021;149:110661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hu RJ, Lin H, Wang MM, Zhao YZ, Liu HJ, Min YN, et al. Lactobacillus reuteri-derived extracellular vesicles maintain intestinal immune homeostasis against lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses in broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021;12:25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Romano S, Savva GM, Bedarf JR, Charles IG, Hildebrand F, Narbad A. Meta-analysis of the Parkinson’s disease gut microbiome suggests alterations linked to intestinal inflammation. npj Parkinson’s Dis. 2021;7:27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Gu XR, Zhou JY, Zhou YY, Wang HJ, Si N, Ren W, et al. Huanglian Jiedu decoction remodels the periphery microenvironment to inhibit Alzheimer’s disease progression based on the “brain–gut” axis through multiple integrated omics. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13:44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Misheva M, Ilott NE, Mccullagh JSO. Recent advances and future directions in microbiome metabolomics. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2021;20:100283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pahnke J, Frohlich C, Paarmann K, Krohn M, Bogdanovic N, Arsland D, et al. Cerebral ABC transporter-common mechanisms may modulate neurodegenerative diseases and depression in elderly subjects. Arch Med Res. 2014;45:738–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Woo HI, Chun MR, Yang JS, Lim SW, Kim MJ, Kim SW, et al. Plasma amino acid profiling in major depressive disorder treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Cns Neurosci Ther. 2015;21:417–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Nagasawa M, Ogino Y, Kurata K, Otsuka T, Yoshida J, Tomonaga S, et al. Hypothesis with abnormal amino acid metabolism in depression and stress vulnerability in Wistar Kyoto rats. Amino Acids. 2012;43:2101–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sun XY, Song ZH, Si YW, Wang JH. microRNA and mRNA profiles in ventral tegmental area relevant to stress-induced depression and resilience. Progr Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;86:150–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Young J, Bruno D, Pomara N. A review of the relationship between proinflammatory cytokines and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. 2014;169:15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hilsden RJ, Meddings JB, Hardin J, Grant Gall D, Sutherland LR. Intestinal permeability and postheparin plasma diamine oxidase activity in the prediction of Crohn’s disease relapse. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;2:85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Köhler O, Krogh J, Mors O, Benros ME. Inflammation in depression and the potential for anti-inflammatory treatment. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2015;14:732–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Li HW, Lin SY, Qin TT, Li HY, Ma ZQ, Ma SP. Senegenin exerts anti-depression effect in mice induced by chronic un-predictable mild stress via inhibition of NF-κB regulating NLRP3 signal pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;53:24–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wu XL, Tang BQ, Liao X, Su ZR, Lee SMY, Cai YF, et al. Suppressive effects of the supercritical-carbon dioxide fluid extract of Chrysanthemum indicum on chronic unpredictable mild stress-induced depressive-like behavior in mice. Food Funct. 2019;10:1212–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Björkholma C, Monteggiab LM. BDNF—a key transducer of antidepressant effects. Neuropharmacology. 2016;102:72–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Xu YX, Liang LY. Vitamin D3/vitamin D receptor signaling mitigates symptoms of post-stroke depression in mice by upregulating hippocampal BDNF expression. Neurosci Res. 2020;170:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Khan A, Shal B, Naveed M, Shah FA, Atiq A, Khan NU, et al. Matrine ameliorates anxiety and depression-like behaviour by targeting hyperammonemia-induced neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in CCl4 model of liver injury. Neurotoxicology. 2019;72:38–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Liu Z, Lv Y, Zhang Y, Liu FQ, Zhu L, Pan S, et al. Matrine-type alkaloids inhibit advanced glycation end products induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis of aortic endothelial cells in vivo and in vitro by targeting MKK3 and p38MAPK signaling. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e007441.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Pu J, Fang FF, Li XQ, Shu ZH, Jiang YP. Matrine exerts a strong anti-arthritic effect on type II Collagen-Induced arthritis in rats by inhibiting inflammatory responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Kan QC, Lv P, Zhang XJ, Xu YM, Zhang GX, Zhu L. Matrine protects neuro-axon from CNS inflammation-induced injury. Exp Mol Pathol. 2015;98:124–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Eftekhari A, Ahmadian E, Azarmi Y, Parvizpur A, Hamishehkar H, Eghbal MA. In vitro/vivo studies towards mechanisms of risperidone-induced oxidative stress and the protective role of coenzyme Q10 and N-acetylcysteine. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2016;26:520–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Chodari L, Dilsiz Aytemir M, Vahedi P, Alipour M, Vahed SZ, Khatibi SMH, et al. Targeting mitochondrial biogenesis with polyphenol compounds. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was supported by grants from the Research Foundation of Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Development (No. 20190304026YY, 20200404124YY, 20200201135JC, 20210204164YY, 20210402051GH), the Foundation of Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission (No. 2020C015), the Foundation of Human Resources and Social Security Department of Jilin Province (No. 2020009), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 135130006, 130029804, 111498001, 131004006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MZ and LL planned and designed the research. MZ wrote the manuscript and performed all experiments. AQL completed 16S and metabolomics data analysis. QFY and JYL helped MZ perform CUMS procedure and behavioral testing. LHZ, GNW, YS, YXH, and MQZ helped the implementation of the experiment. LL and ZBS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenbo Song or Lei Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee at Northeast Normal University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The sucrose preference (%) of the control group, CUMS model group, imipramine group, and three different concentrations (-L: 15 mg/ml, -M: 30 mg/ml, and -H: 60 mg/ml) of matrine group at 0, 1, 4, and 6 weeks. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). *padj < 0.05, ***padj < 0.001 versus the control group (Con); #padj < 0.05, ##padj < 0.01, ###padj < 0.001 versus the CUMS group. Figure S2. Comparison of alpha diversity of gut microbiota in mice with different treatment groups. A Chao1 index, B phylogenetic diversity, and C Shannon diversity. Figure S3. Boxplots showing differences in relative abundance of ASVs according to LEfSe analysis (select the top 50 ASVs at genus level). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 versus the control group (Con); #padj< 0.05, ##padj< 0.01, ###padj< 0.001 versus the CUMS group. Figure S4. The heat map of 7 differential metabolites of amino acids (p < 0.05). Figure S5. Spearman correlation between neurotransmitters, depression-like behaviors, the differential gut microbiota, and the differential gut metabolites. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient among 9 depression-related indicators, 5 gut microbiota, and 19 gut metabolites that differed significantly in abundance between different groups. Axis label: red, depression-related indicators; blue, gut microbiota; black, gut metabolites. Numbers on the lower left area: value of correlation coefficient; symbols on the upper right area: results of significance test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Table S1.. The schedule of CUMS stressors. Table S2. Identification and change trend of differential metabolites in Fig. 3C, E.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Li, A., Yang, Q. et al. Matrine alleviates depressive-like behaviors via modulating microbiota–gut–brain axis in CUMS-induced mice. J Transl Med 21, 145 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Matrine
  • Depression
  • Gut microbiota
  • Metabolomics
  • Microbiota–gut–brain axis