Skip to main content

Association between physical activity and infertility: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis



Physical activity (PA) may protect against infertility by modulating the hypothalamic-pituitary–gonadal axis, thereby reducing gonadotropin levels, elevating immune function, and inhibiting inflammation and circulating sex hormones. However, whether PA reduces the risk of infertility remains largely unknown. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the preventive effects of PA on infertility.


We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases to retrieve published epidemiologic studies on the relationship between PA and infertility. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we selected English literature publishedprior to 11 April 2022, and assessed study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Our protocol, including the full methods employed for this review, is available on PROSPERO (ID = CRD42020143344).


Six cohort studies and four case–control studies based on 708,965 subjects and 12,580 cases were eventually screened and retained. High levels of PA were shown to reduced risk of infertility relative to low levels (cumulative relative risk [RR] = 0.59, with a 95% confidence interval CI 0.49–0.71), and we reported results for cohort studies (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50–0.79) and case–control studies (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.35–0.67). Our findings were comparable for men (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.04) and women (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47–0.66). The meta-analysis of six risk estimates from five studies of low, moderate, and high PA levels showed that moderate PA may also reduce the risk of infertility compared with low PA (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.77). However, high PA also appeared to slightly augment the risk of infertility compared with moderate PA (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.59).


This present systematic review comprehensively reflected an inverse relationship between different levels of PA and infertility, and our meta-analysis showed that a moderate-to-high PA level significantly reduced the overall risk of infertility, and that this level of PA activity was a common protective factor. In addition, limited evidence suggested that compliance with international PA guidelines would greatly lower the risk of infertility (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74; I2 = 0.0%). Future studies, however, need to be executed to further determine the frequency, optimal dosage, and duration required to effectively attenuate the risk of infertility.


Infertility is a disease characterized by failure to confirm clinical pregnancy after 12 months of routine unprotected intercourse, or due to the impaired reproductive capability of the individual or their partner [1]. The prevalence rate in more developed nations is 3.5% to 16.7%, and that in less developed nations is 6.9% to 19.3%, with the overall median prevalence estimated to be 9% [2]. The incidence of infertility has increased significantly, and it has become the third most serious disease after cancer and cardiovascular disease [3]; it has been estimated that 186 million people worldwide are affected by infertility, the majority of whom are residents of developing countries [4, 5]. Infertility exerts a negative impact on overall health, population numbers, and socio-economic factors [6], and the inability to produce children affects men and women worldwide. Infertility can cause depression, pain, loss of control, low self-esteem, marital distress, and sexual dissatisfaction—as well as societal discrimination and ostracism [7, 8]. The exact cause of infertility remains unknown, although the morbidity associated with this condition is high. Several studies have suggested that late childbirth, illegal and legal abortions, genetic variation, and the excessive use of contraception are all possible factors involved in the growth of infertility [6, 9,10,11].

Both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are effective treatments for infertility. Medications for female infertility such as clomiphene citrate have developed into first-line treatments for infertility and are gaining popularity among the general public. However, its side effects include—but are not limited to—insomnia, headache, mood swings, dizziness, hair loss, visual disturbances, and multiple pregnancy [12]. Although cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is an alternative to pharmacotherapy that aims to diminish anxiety and to promote the mental health of infertile women, few authors have assessed the effectiveness of CBT interventions in the field of infertility [13, 14]. Therefore, the prevention of infertility will avoid the long, expensive, and difficult processes involved in pregnancy.

One potential candidate that is increasingly being used to treat infertility is physical activity (PA). The World Health Organization (WHO) defines PA as "any physical movement produced by skeletal muscle that consumes energy" [15], and recommends more than 150 min of high PA per week to reduce the risk of reproduction [16]. When properly prescribed, PA is an inexpensive and universal “medication” with minimal side effects; PA is a veritable "home pharmacy" that we always carry with us [17]. PA appears to reduce infertility through biologic and physiologic mechanisms by strengthening antioxidant defenses and reducing inflammation of bodily fluids, organs, and tissues [18, 19]. Some randomized controlled trials have reported a therapeutic effect of PA on infertility that acts through systemic effects such as increased immune function, insulin resistance, and circulating sex hormones [20]. However, in contrast to the well-known beneficial effects of regular PA on many adverse health outcomes (including prevention of premature death), the effect of PA on fertility in the general population is unclear [21].

A large number of meta-analyses in recent years have revealed that PA reduces the risk of endometriosis in infertile women, while others suggest that PA in polycystic ovary syndrome improves reproductive performance [22]. However, to our knowledge, few meta-analyses have been undertaken to evaluate the effects of PA on infertility. Therefore, in the present systematic review and meta-analysis we assessed whether the implementation of PA reduced the risk of infertility. In addition, equally important potential regulatory factors and their relationships to infertility including alcohol consumption, smoking, and household income factors were also evaluated. Although we still recognize very little in terms of the duration and intensity of PA in reducing the risk of infertility, our results are likely to provide valuable information with respect to clinical guidelines and interventions in refining the design of primary interventions in infertility.

Main text

This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and our protocol, including the full methods for this review, is available on (ID = CRD42020143344) (Additional file 2).

Literature search

We evaluated relevant studies publishedto 11 April 2022 in the EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. We used the OR operator to connect these descriptors of PA: ‘physical activity’, ‘Exercises’, ‘Activities, Physical’, ‘Activity, Physical’, ‘Physical Activities’, ‘Exercise, Physical’, ‘Exercises, Physical’, ‘Physical Exercise’, ‘Physical Exercises’, ‘Acute Exercise’, ‘Acute Exercises’, ‘Exercise, Acute’, ‘Exercises, Acute’, ‘Exercise, Isometric’, ‘Exercises, Isometric’, ‘Isometric Exercises’, ‘Isometric Exercise’, ‘Exercise, Aerobic’, ‘Aerobic Exercise’, ‘Aerobic Exercises’, ‘Exercises, Aerobic’, ‘Exercise Training’, ‘Exercise Trainings’, ‘Training, Exercise’, and “Trainings, Exercise”. Subsequently, we employed an AND operator to combine the previous terms with the following terms for infertility outcomes: “Infertility”, “Sterility, Reproductive”, “Sterility”, “Subfertility”, and “Sub-Fertility”. Our search strategy was based upon human-oriented research articles in English, and we also examined reference lists that met the search strategy so as to allow searching for other pertinent studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Two authors (F.F.X. and C.G.) comprehensively and independently reviewed the articles. Studies were included if they: (1) investigated the relationship between PA and infertility; (2) used observational studies in cohort or case–control designs; (3) published odds ratios (OR), relative risks (RR), or hazard ratios (HR); and (4) reported a relative risk with its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) or sufficient information to calculate these indices. We excluded studies that combined PA with other interventions such as diet, behavioral therapy, or antidepressant medication; and also excluded those that were classified as an editorial, review, meta-analysis, comment, news, letter, or practice guideline Additional file 1.

Data extraction

All retrieved studies were independently screened by two individuals, and if a paper was considered relevant, it was included and a standardized qualification form was used to retrieve the complete article and potentially related research that allowed us to conduct a detailed assessment. If the reviewer disagreed with the qualifications of the study, an agreement was reached after discussion.

To assess the potential differences in PA relative to infertility, we extracted the first author’s last name; number of cases; publication date; sex; sample size; study design and location; definition of highest, moderate, and lowest levels of physical activity; relative risk estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI); and adjustment factors. We extracted the relative risk estimates of men and women separately whenever they were treated as independent samples. If authors reported different types of PA assessments, lifelong PA, vigorous PA, and quantitative PA were given priority in our assessments. When selecting quantitative PA assessments, we utilized PA frequency as this was the most common quantitative PA measurement component, and the frequency was reported as the number of PA periods per week.

In the 10 studies that we selected, four [23,24,25,26] reported relative risk estimates with high levels of PA as the reference group, and we converted the reported relative risk estimates (RRi) to reciprocal values. The remaining studies directly involved high PA.

Study quality

Study quality was evaluated with the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), with the evaluation carried out by two people independently (F.F.X. and L.Y.Y.). A third experienced manager joined the discussion and decided the outcome in case of any disparate evaluation results. The total score for the NOS of nine points was primarily used to evaluate case–control studies (exposure, selection, and comparability) and cohort studies (comparability, outcome, and selection). Quality scores lower than four were assigned to low-quality studies, and those ranging from five to nine were determined to be high-quality studies [27].

Data analysis

The odds ratios and hazard ratios were interpreted to reflect the relative risk estimates (RRi) in measuring the association between PA and infertility risk. We directly extracted the most comprehensively adjusted risk estimates reported in the original literature when RRi values were available. Otherwise, we calculated RRs and 95% CIs via Stata software, version 11.0. We then calculated the relative risk estimate log (RRi) and its corresponding natural logarithm: S.E. si = (log [upper 95% CI limit of the RR] − log [RR])/1.96, and a random-effects model was exploited rather than a fixed-effects model to account for the weighted averages of the log (RRi)s, while taking into consideration the heterogeneity of effects measurements. In addition, the log (RRi)s by wi = 1/(si2 + t2) were weighted, where si represented the standard error of log (RRi), and t2 represented the restricted maximum likelihood estimate of the overall variance. Heterogeneity was obtained using Q- and I2-statistics [28]. We employed I2 statistics to assist in characterizing the heterogeneity between studies, and showed an I2 < 25%, which designated an important indicator of heterogeneity [28]. Considering that our results may be biased, we utilized funnel plots, Begg’s rank method [29], and Egger's linear regression method to detect publication bias [30]. p-values were considered to be statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

In a sub-analysis we examined the relation of PA to infertility risk with the classification of sex (men, women), study design (case–control, cohort), PA intensity (high, moderate and low), component or measure of PA (qualitative assessments, activity frequency), number of adjustment factors (smoking, marital status, weight or height), adjusted body mass index (BMI: yes, no), adjusted smoking (yes, no) and geographic region (United States of American (USA), United Kingdom (UK), and Asia).

Statistical analyses were conducted with Stata version 11.0 software (Stata Corp LP, College Station, TX, USA), and relative risk estimates were reported with 95% CIs. The statistical significance level of this study was 0.05 (α = 0.05).


A total of 708,965 subjects and 12,580 cases were included in this meta-analysis. We initially retrieved 2923 studies through four databases (495 from PubMed, 1170 form EMBASE, 465 from the Cochrane Library, and 793 from CINAHL), of which 1720 articles were retained after we removed duplicate studies. We also excluded unrelated studies by reading the titles and abstracts, and read the remaining 50 studies in depth; of these, 40 were further excluded because PA or relative risk date was not available or the study design did not meet our requirements. In one study the authors examined male and female samples separately and analyzed the risk of infertility in PA for men and women [23]. We then ultimately included in the present work 10 studies that yielded 12 different relative risk estimates [3, 21, 23,24,25,26, 31,32,33,34] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram of identification and selection of eligible studies

Table 1 shows the principal characteristics of the six cohort studies [3, 21, 24, 26, 31, 32] and four case–control studies [23, 25, 33, 34] of PA and infertility in our meta-analysis. The studies were conducted in eight countries: two in China [3, 31], two in the UK [32, 33], and the remaining six in the USA [34], Iran [24], Norway [21], Estonia [26], the Palestinian Territories [25], and France [23]. Two-thirds of the analyzed factors were adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption; and obesity; and one-third of the risk estimates were adjusted for other factors such as age, marriage, medication use, and marital status. In addition, according to the five studies we included [23, 31,32,33,34], PA over 150 min/week was defined as high PA, less than 30 min as low PA, and 30–150 min as moderate PA (depicted in Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of the 8 studies on physical activity and digestive system cancer risk included in the meta-analysis

We summarized 12 relative risk estimates using the random-effects model to reveal a 41% reduction in infertility risk with a high vs. low level of PA (RR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.49–0.71), and with low heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 30.4%, p-value for heterogeneity across all studies < 0.001) (Fig. 2). When we executed a stratified analysis of the study-design type, we observed a 37% reduction in infertility risk when a case–control study was removed (RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.50–0.79, heterogeneity Chi-squared = 44.4%, p < 0.001). Similarly, when the cohort studies were removed, a 51% reduction was observed in infertility risk (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.35–0.67, heterogeneity Chi-squared = 0.0%, p < 0.001). The P-value for heterogeneity across the case–control and cohort studies were all significant (p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 3). In addition, the pooled estimates from both the case–control and cohort studies showed low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%). When we analyzed our data according to the factor of sex, a direct comparison between women and men revealed a stronger inverse association between PA and infertility in men (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.04, p = 0.075) than women (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47–0.66, p = 0.000) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 12 risk estimates of infertility for a high versus low level of PA

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 12 risk estimates of infertility for a high versus low level of PA, grouped by study design

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 12 risk estimates of infertility for a high versus low level of PA, grouped by gender

In order to determine publication bias, we constructed a funnel plot (Fig. 5), and executed Begg’s rank correlation test (p = 0.95) (Fig. 6) and Egger’s regression test (p = 0.48) (Fig. 7), with none indicating publication bias (p > 0.05).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Standardized Funnel plot corresponding to the main random-effects meta-analysis

Fig. 6
figure 6

Standardized Begg’s rank correlation test corresponding to the main random-effects meta-analysis

Fig. 7
figure 7

Standardised Egger’s regression test corresponding to the main random-effects meta-analysis

Regarding the impact of differing levels of PA on the risk of infertility, our meta-analysis of six risk estimates from five studies [3, 21, 24,25,26] of low, moderate, and high PA levels showed that moderate PA may also reduce the risk of infertility compared with low PA (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.77) (Fig. 8); while compared with moderate PA, high PA increased the risk of infertility (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.59) (Fig. 9). In addition, our limited evidence [23, 31,32,33,34] suggested that compliance with international PA guidelines greatly lowered the risk of infertility (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74; I2 = 0.0%) (Fig. 10).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 6 risk estimates of infertility for a moderate versus low level of PA

Fig. 9
figure 9

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 4 risk estimates of infertility for a high versus moderate level of PA

Fig. 10
figure 10

Forest plot of a random effects meta-analysis including 6 risk estimates of infertility for PA guidelines

An evaluation of study quality is depicted in Table 2, with an average quality score of 6.10 (SD = 0.57, median = 6). The studies we included contained a variety of potential confounders, including smoking (2/8), drinking alcohol (2/8), and marital status (2/8), with none of the studies showing a correction of infertility symptoms. Among these studies, investigators in four studies diagnosed and defined infertility clearly, and the overall evaluation of our included articles was above six points. The studies reflected high-quality research according to the questionnaire survey, although they did not indicate whether their case group was a continuous case or acknowledge its representativeness.

Table 2 Quality of studies according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale


PA fosters development and normal growth, improves mood, function, and sleep quality, and lowers the risk of chronic diseases [35, 36]. In the field of reproduction, new WHO guidelines recommend that pregnant women achieve at least 150 min/week of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise to help increase their chances of becoming pregnant, and to also improve their overall health [16]. These recommendations are considered safe in the treatment of infertility and are consistent with ours. In addition, the WHO Guidelines Advisory Committee graded the evidence based on the consistency and quality of the research, with evidence graded as strong or moderate used as the basis for the key guidelines [37, 38]. This was reflected in our results with regard to high-to-moderate PA. In 2018, the American College of Sports Medicine International Multidisciplinary Roundtable was tasked with updating the recommendations and focused on evidence from the exercise method, including resistance exercise and aerobic exercise [39]. Thus, in our meta-analysis we selected exercise patterns based on differing levels of PA; i.e., high vs. low PA, high vs. moderate PA, and moderate vs. low PA—as well as on meeting vs. not meeting the international PA guidelines. We implemented a random-effects meta-analysis on the association between PA and infertility, and our results indicated that PA was a protective factor against infertility; and that compared with low PA, high PA levels reduced the risk of infertility by 39% and moderate PA did so by 30%. However, compared to moderate PA, high PA increased the risk of infertility (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.59).

An analysis stratified by sex and research types showed that PA exerted a protective effect on infertility, and that the summary RR estimate was not affected by individual and potentially influential factors such as sex, study region, study design, or the number of adjustment factors. The effects of individual factors were verified in previous meta-analyses of PA and polycystic ovary syndrome [22], reproductive health [40], and depression [41]. Congruent with our results, these reports showed no statistically significant heterogeneity across sex [41], study design [22, 40], geographic region [42], or adjustment factors [40].

In 2016, the authors of a review explored the impact of PA on infertility patients [43]. Several methodologic issues related to PA and infertility were discussed, including a definition of the components of PA, assessment of the research (e.g., type, duration, and frequency), and a consideration of the optimal way to measure PA. Investigators evaluated several influencing factors and eventually concluded that PA may alleviate infertility through variables such as body mass index and age [44]. Another study showed that when obese infertile women increased their PA, such lifestyle changes not only improved their fertility, but also improved the overall health of their offspring [45]. Another paper focused on the relationship between PA and endometriosis risk in women with infertility or pain, and revealed that PA reduced pain and infertility caused by endometriosis; however, the authors left as unexplained whether their findings could be interpreted as constituting a role for exercise at the molecular and endocrine levels, or whether the findings were related to a variety of complex mechanisms such as study design, control selection, and PA in improving infertility. There are currently no data as to the potential effects of PA on infertility.

A recent study in which the efficacy of PA on pregnancy rate [46] focused on PA intensity included both moderate and vigorous intensity. Herein we finally concluded that any amount of vigorous PA was associated with increased pregnancy rate and that pregnant patients need to be supported in their exercise regimens during pregnancy. Our findings on the impact of PA on infertility are thus virtually identical to the results of the previous study.

Several mechanisms may explain our current findings. PA in women experiencing infertility may lead to the resumption of ovulation by regulating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis so as to increase hypothalamus-pituitary–gonadal (HPG) activity. High PA with energy consumption and opioid fluctuations caused by excessive exercise also demonstrated HPA dysfunction. Long-term exercise for women with infertility can decrease insulin and free androgen levels, leading to HPA mediating the recovery of infertility [47]. Other underlying mechanisms of infertility have been explained as related to toxic metals causing adverse reproductive effects. For example, non-essential metals that include cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), and arsenic (As) are reproductive toxicants that are widely distributed within the environment and affect hormonal levels. Infertile women may manifest reduced sensitivity by their ovaries to gonadotropins, resulting in higher circulating gonadotropin levels such as higher average serum FSH and LH levels, and high serum FSH levels indicate poor ovarian function [48]. Several studies have shown that engaging in PA might assist in reducing Pb accumulation and gonadotropin levels in infertile women [31, 49,50,51]. In addition to these mechanisms subserving the influence of PA on infertility, PA is also known to activate anti-oxidant defenses and increase immune function. PA significantly inhibited inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α), oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species and malondialdehyde), and antioxidants (superoxide dismutase, catalase, and total antioxidant capacity); and these changes coincided with favorable improvements in semen parameters, sperm DNA integrity, and pregnancy rate. These data indicated that PA was sufficient in improving male reproductive function markers in infertile patients [52].

One novel aspect of the current study was the use of known varieties of infertility to conduct a meta-analysis of the relationship between PA and infertility. Another strength of the current study was a minimized publication bias in our systematic exploration of databases in the fields of infertility and PA. We categorized the studies by design, conducted subgroup analyses for each design group, and implemented a tool for the assessment of study quality to address potential selection, misclassification, and confounder biases specifically. We ultimately uncovered an inverse association between PA and infertility risk in analyses that included all risk estimates from high-quality studies.


Our comprehensive meta-analysis provided support for an inverse relationship between PA and risk of infertility, revealing that a moderate to high PA level significantly reduced the overall risk of infertility and was a common protective factor. In addition, limited evidence suggested that compliance with international PA guidelines greatly lowered the risk of infertility (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74; I2 = 0.0%). In the future, investigators need to determine the frequency, optimal dosage, and duration of PA required to effectively reduce the risk of infertility.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated are included in this published article.



Physical activity


Summary relative risk


Confidence interval


Cognitive behavior therapy


World Health Organization


Newcastle–Ottawa Scale


Body mass index






  1. Vander Borght M, Wyns C. Fertility and infertility: definition and epidemiology[J]. Clin Biochem. 2018;62:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Human Reproduct. 2007;22(6):1506–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cong J, Li P, Zheng L, Tan JT. Prevalence and risk factors of infertility at a rural site of Northern China[J]. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0155563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century[J]. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):411–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ombelet W, Cooke I, Dyer S, Serour G, Devroey P. Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries[J]. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(6):605–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirzaei M, Namiranian N, Dehghani Firouzabadi R, Gholami S. The prevalence of infertility in 20–49 years women in Yazd, 2014–2015: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Rep Biomed. 2018;16(11):683–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pasha H, Basirat Z, Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F. Comparative effectiveness of antidepressant medication versus psychological intervention on depression symptoms in women with infertility and sexual dysfunction[J]. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018;12(1):6–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys[J]. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12): e1001356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dammen LV, Wekker V, Rooij SD, et al. The effects of a pre-conception lifestyle intervention in women with obesity and infertility on perceived stress, mood symptoms, sleep and quality of life[J]. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0212914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Onidentification CG. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults-the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998, 6.

  11. Cates W Jr, Rolfs RT Jr, Aral SO. Sexually transmitted diseases, pelvic inflammatory disease, and infertility: an epidemiologic update. Epidemiol Rev. 1990;12:199–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao R, Guo B, Bai J, Wu Y, Wu K. Acupuncture and clomiphene citrate for anovulatory infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acupuncture Med J Br Med Acupunct Soc. 2020;38(1):25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Faramarzi M, Pasha H, Esmailzadeh S, Kheirkhah F, Heidary S, Afshar Z. The effect of the cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy on infertility stress: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Fertility Sterility. 2013;7(3):199–206.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Faramarzi M, Kheirkhah F, Esmaelzadeh S, Alipour A, Hjiahmadi M, Rahnama J. Is psychotherapy a reliable alternative to pharmacotherapy to promote the mental health of infertile women? A randomized clinical trial[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;141(1):49–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour[J]. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The physical activity guidelines for Americans[J]. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2020–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuka V, Dankova M, Riegel K, Matoulek M. Physical activity-the Holy Grail of modern medicine? Vnitr Lek. 2017;63(10):729–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hajizadeh Maleki B, Tartibian B. Resistance exercise modulates male factor infertility through anti-inflammatory and antioxidative mechanisms in infertile men: A RCT[J]. Life Sci. 2018;203:150–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraczek M, Kurpisz M. Cytokines in the male reproductive tract and their role in infertility disorders[J]. J Reprod Immunol. 2015;108:98–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McTiernan A. Mechanisms linking physical activity with cancer[J]. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8(3):205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gudmundsdottir SL, Flanders WD, Augestad LB. Physical activity and fertility in women: the North-Trøndelag Health Study[J]. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3196–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benham JL, Yamamoto JM, Friedenreich CM, Rabi DM, Sigal RJ. Role of exercise training in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Obes. 2018;8(4):275–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Foucaut AM, Faure C, Julia C, Czernichow S, Levy R, Dupont C. Sedentary behavior, physical inactivity and body composition in relation to idiopathic infertility among men and women[J]. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4): e0210770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Esmaeilzadeh S, Delavar MA, Basirat Z, Shafi H. Physical activity and body mass index among women who have experienced infertility[J]. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(3):499–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Dhair A, Abed Y. The association of types, intensities and frequencies of physical activity with primary infertility among females in Gaza Strip, Palestine: a case-control study[J]. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10): e0241043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Läänelaid S, Ortega FB, Kunovac Kallak T, Joelsson L, Ruiz JR, Hreinsson J, et al. Physical and sedentary activities in association with reproductive outcomes among couples seeking infertility treatment: a prospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ownby RL, Crocco E, Acevedo A, John V, Loewenstein D. Depression and risk for Alzheimer disease: systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression analysis[J]. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):530–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Melsen WG, Bootsma MC, Rovers MM, Bonten MJ. The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(2):123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias[J]. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Song F, Gilbody S. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test Increase in studies of publication bias coincided with increasing use of meta-analysis. BMJ Clin Res. 1998;316(7129):471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lei HL, Wei HJ, Ho HY, Liao KW, Chien LC. Relationship between risk factors for infertility in women and lead, cadmium, and arsenic blood levels: a cross-sectional study from Taiwan[J]. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. Physical activity, body mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility[J]. Epidemiology. 2002;13(2):184–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Forman D, Pike MC, Davey G, Dawson S, Baker K, Chilvers CED, et al. Aetiology of testicular cancer: association with congenital abnormalities, age at puberty, infertility, and exercise[J]. BMJ. 1994;308(6941):1393–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Green BB, Daling JR, Weiss NS. Exercise as a risk factor for infertility with ovulatory dysfunction[J]. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(12):1432–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Fiatarone Singh MA, Minson CT, Nigg CR, Salem GJ, et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand Exercise and physical activity for older adults[J]. Med Sci Sports Exer. 2009;41(7):1510–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Erickson KI, Hillman C, Stillman CM, Ballard RM, Bloodgood B, Conroy DE, et al. Physical activity, cognition, and brain outcomes: a review of the 2018 physical activity guidelines[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1242–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. King AC, Whitt-Glover MC, Marquez DX, Buman MP, Napolitano MA, Jakicic J, et al. Physical activity promotion: highlights from the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee systematic review[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1340–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Katzmarzyk PT, Powell KE, Jakicic JM, Troiano RP, Piercy K, Tennant B. Sedentary behavior and health: update from the 2018 physical activity guidelines advisory committee[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1227–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Campbell KL, Winters-Stone KM, Wiskemann J, May AM, Schwartz AL, Courneya KS, et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(11):2375–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mena GP, Mielke GI, Brown WJ. The effect of physical activity on reproductive health outcomes in young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Human Reproduct Update. 2019;25:541–56.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wu PL, Lee M, Huang TT. Effectiveness of physical activity on patients with depression and Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review[J]. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7): e0181515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Korczak DJ, Madigan S, Colasanto M. Children’s physical activity and depression: a meta-analysis[J]. Pediatrics. 2017;139(4): e20162266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Evenson KR, Hesketh KR. Studying the complex relationships between physical activity and infertility[J]. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2016;10(4):232–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Harrison CL, Brown WJ, Hayman M, Moran LJ, Redman LM. The role of physical activity in preconception, pregnancy and postpartum health[J]. Seminars Rep Med. 2016;34(2):e28-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. van Elten TM, Karsten MDA, Geelen A, van Oers AM, van Poppel MNM, Groen H, et al. Effects of a preconception lifestyle intervention in obese infertile women on diet and physical activity; a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial[J]. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11): e0206888.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kaneda C, Kanejima Y, Kitamura M, Izawa KP. Physical activity and body mass index in relation to infertility in women[J]. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15(3):199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hakimi O, Cameron LC. Effect of exercise on ovulation: a systematic review[J]. Sports Med. 2017;47(8):1555–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Randolph JF, Ginsburg KA, Leach RE, Blacker CM, Moghissi KS, Diamond MP, et al. Elevated early follicular gonadotropin levels in women with unexplained infertility do not provide evidence for disordered gonadotropin-releasing hormone secretion as assessed by luteinizing hormone pulse characteristics[J]. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(2):320–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Guo Z, Guo H, Xia Y. Effects on endocrine system of female rats exposed to chronic arsenic J. J Hygiene Res. 2011;40(2):178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gallagher CM, Moonga BS, Kovach JS. Cadmium, follicle-stimulating hormone, and effects on bone in women age 42–60 years, NHANES III[J]. Environ Res. 2010;110(1):105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Krieg EF Jr. The relationships between blood lead levels and serum follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[J]. Environ Res. 2007;104(3):374–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Niederberger C. Re: high-intensity exercise training for improving reproductive function in infertile patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Urol. 2018;199(2):331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to Ruiping Wang for advice relating to the analysis. We also would like to thank Professor Min Fang from the University of shanghai university of traditional Chinese medicine for proofreading the manuscript.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81774443 and 82105038) and the National Key Technology R&D Program of China Grant numbers 2017YFC1703301.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The project was conceived and designed by all the authors. FFX and YLY performed the search and meta-analysis. FY and JTX contributed to data analysis and interpretation. The manuscript draft that was revised by all co-authors. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fei Yao or Jiatuo Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed to publish this article.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Proof of polishing changes to the language

Additional file 2

: Screenshot of registration link

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, F., You, Y., Guan, C. et al. Association between physical activity and infertility: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Transl Med 20, 237 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: