Skip to main content

The role of Exosomal miRNAs in cancer

Abstract

Exosomal miRNAs have attracted much attention due to their critical role in regulating genes and the altered expression of miRNAs in virtually all cancers affecting humans (Sun et al. in Mol Cancer 17(1):14, 2018). Exosomal miRNAs modulate processes that interfere with cancer immunity and microenvironment, and are significantly involved in tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis and drug resistance. Fully investigating the detailed mechanism of miRNAs in the occurrence and development of various cancers could help not only in the treatment of cancers but also in the prevention of malignant diseases. The current review highlighted recently published advances regarding cancer-derived exosomes, e.g., sorting and delivery mechanisms for RNAs. Exosomal miRNAs that modulate cancer cell-to-cell communication, impacting tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis and multiple biological features, were discussed. Finally, the potential role of exosomal miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers was summarized, as well as their usefulness in detecting cancer resistance to therapeutic agents.

Background

Reports assessing exosomes in relation to cancer biology have been on an exponential rise recently. Exosomes represent membrane-bound vesicles with diameters ranging between 30 and 150 nm, and are found in virtually all body fluids. Most cell types release these molecules into the extracellular space upon fusion with the cytoplasmic membrane [1]. Exosomal content involves unique miRNAs, mRNAs, DNA fragments, lipids and proteins, which genetically specify their cells of origin [2]. Exosomes are then taken up by other cells for subsequent modulation of recipient cells. Currently, miRNAs in exosomes are attracting increasing attention due to their contributions in recruiting and reprogramming important components of the tumor microenvironment. They are also considered to be essential in intercellular communication along with cell-to-cell contact-related signaling through the transfer of soluble molecules [3]. This represents an emerging concept, with a shallow understanding of exosomal miRNAs in general. The current review examined the biological properties of exosomes, discussed the proposed mechanisms of miRNA loading into exosomes, highlighted the mechanisms by which exosomal miRNAs affect tumor progression and outlined the potential use of exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers in multiple malignancies [4].

Exosome formation and the biogenetic and sorting mechanisms of exosomal miRNAs

At present, exosomes have been found to be mainly generated by mechanisms dependent on or independent of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT).ESCRT consists of different protein complexes and helper proteins, which participate in the formation of membrane-invagination and polyvesicle body (MVBs), and mediates the fusion of MVBs with cell membrane, resulting in the formation of exosomes. Meanwhile, IT has been found that MVBs can also be produced in a mechanism independent of ESCRT, enriching the research on exosome formation [5].

The biogenetic process leading to exosomal miRNAs starts in the nuclear compartment, in which DNA sequences producing miRNAs undergo transcription by RNA polymerase for generating primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs). The generated pri-miRNAs are initially included in longer molecules, and undergo processing in the nucleus to form 70–100 nt long hairpin RNAs [6]. Exportin 5 assists in the transportation of hairpin pri-miRNAs to the cytoplasm, in which they are further processed by Dicer. Upon maturation, these double-stranded miRNAs are changed into single-stranded miRNAs, followed by miRNA sorting into exosomes. Based on the current research, it has been deduced that miRNA incorporation into exosomes is not a random event. Although the underlying mechanisms require clear understanding, the cells of origin use sorting processes that specifically guide intracellular miRNAs into exosomes [7]. There are about five potential channels performing miRNA sorting into exosomes, which are described below. (1) Neural sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2)-related pathway: nsMase2 was the first protein reported to be related to miRNA secretion into exosomes. Its downregulation decreased exosomal miRNA amounts, while its overexpression increased exosomal miRNA levels [8]. (2) The pathway associated with the 3′ ends of miRNAs. The 3′ ends of endogenous miRNAs containing uridines are mostly present in B cell- or urine-derived exosomes [9]. Therefore, the 3′ ends of miRNAs contain a powerful sorting signal. (3) The pathway associated with miRNA motifs and sumoylated heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs). Sumoylated hnRNPA2B1 recognizes the GGAG motif at the 3′ end of miRNAs, causing the packaging of specific miRNAs into exosomes [10]. HnRNPA1 and hnRNPC are the other two hnRNP family members also binding to exosomal miRNAs, indicating their involvement in miRNA sorting. (4) MiRNA induced silencing complex (miRISC)-related pathway. Here, mature miRNAs and assembly proteins form the miRNAISC complex, which mainly contains miRNAs, miRNA-repressible mRNAs, and GW182 and AGO2 (Argonaute-binding proteins). The binding of mRNAs by these miRNAs occurs mostly within their 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTRs) [11]. The mRNA/miRNA complex next suppresses translation by preventing initiation or increasing mRNA degradation. Recently published findings have demonstrated a potential association of AGO2 with exosomal miRNA sorting. Data have indicated AGO2 knockout suppresses miRNAs such as miRNA-150, miRNA-142-3p and miRNA-451 in HEK293T-derived exosomes [10]. (5) Ceramide related pathway: As an exogenous ceramide supplement, ceramide C6(C6-cer) can dose-dependent inhibit the proliferation of human multiple myeloma (MM) cells and promote cell apoptosis Further studies showed that C6-cer treatment increased the levels of some tumor-suppressive mirnas (e.g. miR202,miR16,miR29b and miR15a) in exosomes, and the levels of these tumor-suppressive mirnas were also exosomes Changes also occurred in C6-cer treated MM cells, suggesting that the ceramide pathway plays an important role in miRNA incorporation into exosomes [12]. After miRNAs enter the exosomes, many reports have proposed mechanisms by which exosomes are secreted outside the cells, so this is not discussed in this review. The biogenetic and sorting mechanisms of exosomal miRNAs are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sorting process for exosomal miRNAs. MiRNA genes undergo transcription into primary miRNAs (pri-miRNAs) by Pol-II, followed by processing by the DGCR8 and Drosha complex for the formation of precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs), which are exported into the cytosol by the exportin 5 complex. Then, pre-miRNAs undergo digestion by the Dicer complex into mature miRNAs, which are sorted into exosomes through five potential pathways: 1. nSMase2-dependent pathway; 2. 3′ miRNA sequence-dependent pathway; 3. miRNA motif and sumoylated hnRNPs-dependent pathway; 4. MiRNAISC-related pathway.5. Ceramide related pathway

Detection of exosome miRNA

Exosome miRNAs can be detected by a variety of methods, including quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) 、fluorescence and ratio-based electrochemistry Local surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) quantitative methods for exosome miRNA without PCR, these methods enrich the detection technology of exosome miRNA to a certain extent, but there are still some problems such as poor RNA stability, complex and expensive technology and false positive signal [13]. In addition, precision medicine has made great progress in the medical field. The detection of circulating miRNA(C-miRNA) as part of precision medicine has been paid attention to C-miRNA as circulating targets (CTs) is readily available in a variety of body fluids and is released into body fluids in the form of miRNA protein complexes or EV-shuttle complexes, ensuring the high stability of C-miRNA during circulation and repeated freeze–thaw in long-term storage has been reported C-miRNA levels are stable under heating or extreme pH conditions, and thus can be used as a reliable CTs for liquid biopsy. Abnormal expression of C-miRNA can distinguish healthy patients from disease patients. In addition, C-miRNA helps to identify tumor origin and classify tumor types and subtypes, which are important for cancer diagnosis, treatment and prognosis Similarly, the detection of C-miRNA still has some problems, such as expensive equipment and complex operation, which still needs further exploration [14].

The Functions of exosomal miRNAs in Cancer

Exosomal miRNAs in tumor genesis and development

MiRNAs transported by exosomes can affect tumor growth and participate in various processes of tumorigenesis and tumor development [13]. In addition to Fas/FasL, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and other factors, cancer cells secrete specific miRNAs in exosomes. These specific miRNAs, with immunosuppressive properties, can act on activated tumor specific T cells to promote the occurrence of tumors. For example, cervical cancer might be associated with miRNA-21 and miRNA-146a. These miRNAs can attenuate the targeting effect of cervical cancer-specific 293T cells as well as their killing effect on cancer cells, and can even induce 293T cell apoptosis. According to a study, the expression of miRNAs in the vaginal lavage fluid and exosomes of the HeLa cell line in vitro is overtly elevated compared with those of healthy controls, indirectly confirming the above conclusion [15].

In recent years, the emergence of the fluorescent exosome labeling technology has enabled breakthroughs in the relationships between exosome-derived miRNAs and tumor endothelial cells, angiogenesis, material information exchange, and tumor metastasis. For example, previous studies have confirmed that exosomes derived from breast cancer cells with high metastatic potential are rich in miRNA-105. When these exosomes are ingested by pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells, the expression of the tight junction protein ZO-I (Zonula occludens-I) in endothelial cells shows significant downregulation. This in turn leads to vascular permeability increase and helps tumor cells spread into the lungs, becoming a critical factor in tumorigenesis and cancer progression [16].

MiRNAs secreted by exosomes can mediate paracrine and endocrine pathways between different tissues to regulate gene expression and distal cell function. Exosome-derived miRNAs, which are paracrine agonists of toll-like receptor (TLR), are key regulators of tumorigenesis and cancer development. These are closely related to information exchange in the tumor immune system, with essential functions in tumorigenesis and cancer development. For instance, Fabbri and collaborators confirmed that exosomes produced by lung cancer cells contain miRNA-2 l and miRNA-129a, which in turn bind to TLR family members, including mouse TLR7 and human TLR8, as ligands on immune cells, triggering TLR-dependent inflammatory reactions and promoting lung cancer cell proliferation [17]. Some data suggest that miRNAs can regulate TLR signaling pathways through several steps, including regulating TLR mRNA expression and directly activating receptors to bind to TLR or TLR-specific signaling pathway components as well as TLR-induced transcription factors and functional cytokines At the same time, the recent discovery that exosomes contain miRNAs that can reach the TLR in the surrounding cell kernels provides new insights into physiological conditions and various regulatory mechanisms used in disease [18, 19].

In tumorigenic exosomes, there is a necessary cell-independent ripening of precursor miRNAs, which can still promote the malignant transformation of normal breast epithelial cells [20]. Therefore, whether exosomes can abandon tumor suppressor genes and retain cancer genes through unknown internal mechanisms remains unclear.

Exosomal miRNAs in tumor invasion and metastasis

Exosomes obtained from tumor cells enhance the invasiveness of tumors via miRNA transportation [13]. For example, IL-4 activates the secretion of macrophages and transports the oncogenic miRNA-223 to target cells through the Mef2c-β-catenin (Myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2c) pathway. In this pathway, miRNA-223 affects β-catenin production in the nucleus of breast cancer cells by regulating its target gene Mef2c. This subsequently enhances breast cancer cell migration and invasion [21]. At the same time, exosomes act as carriers for the transportation of some miRNAs from the primary site to distant sites; activate tumor cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts; and promote tumor metastasis [22]. For example, downregulation of tight junction proteins and barrier function damage in endothelial monolayers leads to the expression of cancer-secreted miRNA-105 in metastatic breast cancer, inducing vascular permeability and enhancing malignancy [23].

In addition, exosomes could also be used as carriers to transport some miRNAs from the primary site to distant sites, activating tumor cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts, and promoting tumor metastasis. Tanaka and co-workers detected miRNAs in serum exosomes from individuals with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and benign esophageal lesions (without systemic inflammatory response) [24]. Their results showed overtly increased miRNA levels in ESCC cases compared with the control group. At the same time, cell experiments confirmed that serum exosomes from ESCC patients induce ESCC cell proliferation in vitro. The levels of miRNA-21 showed close associations with advanced esophageal cancer stage, lymph node metastasis, inflammatory reactions and so on. However, miRNA-21 could not be detected in the serum supernatant extracted from the exosomes. These results suggested some disease-related miRNAs are only specific to particular exosomes, and can achieve biological functions through the exosomal pathway. In addition to the indirect promotion of angiogenesis, tumor cell-derived exosomes also directly regulate target genes or signaling pathways in vascular endothelial cells by transferring miRNA-21, tissue factors and so on, thus increasing tumor malignancy. The functions of exosomal miRNAs in cancer are presented in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Functions of exosomal miRNAs in cancer. Exosomal miRNAs largely contribute to all carcinogenetic stages. The major mechanisms include the following. A. Tumorigenesis and cancer progression. B. Tumor vascular invasion and metastasis. C. Interactions of tumor cells with the surrounding microenvironment. D. Cancer treatment. E. Therapy resistance

Exosomal miRNAs in the tumor microenvironment (TME)

The microenvironment around the tumor affects the malignant phenotype of the tumor. The TME includes tumor cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and endothelial and immune cells, as well as non-cellular constituents, e.g., exosomes and cytokines, which also have essential functions [25]. Emerging evidence indicates cancer cells secrete higher amounts of exosomes compared with normal cells, even in the very early stage of carcinogenesis. Tumor-derived exosomes (TEXs) function as messengers controlling tumor cells within the TME, with critical roles from the initial tumor generation to the late stage of cancer [26]. TEXs were even found to have critical functions in the pre-cancer stage [27]. In addition, TEXs carrying biologically active miRNAs can reflect the unique features of different kinds of cancers, affecting tumor development [28].

TLR-dependent inflammatory reactions and promoting lung cancer cell proliferation

Compared with the normal internal environment, the most significant feature of the TME is hypoxia. In the TME, under the condition of hypoxia, the infiltration of tumor-related macrophages is critical to tumor occurrence and development. It was reported by Wang et al. [29] that under the condition of hypoxia, macrophages are activated to acquire the M2 phenotype by pancreatic cancer cells through exosomal miR-301a-3p to activate PTEN/PI3Kγ signaling in macrophages. In addition, Chen et al. revealed exosomal miRNA-940 from epithelial ovarian cancer could promote M2 polarization under hypoxia. Other evidences also indicate under hypoxia miRNA-21-3p, miRNA-125b-5p, and miRNA-181d-5p could stimulate M2 polarization in macrophages [30]. M2 macrophage polarization would enhance cancer cell proliferation, invasion and migration. These findings reveal that under the condition of hypoxia, the profile of exosomal miRNAs is altered, which results in TME changes. In addition, many reports convincingly suggest miRNAs could function as oncogenes to structurally and biologically change the TME [31,32,33,34]. CAFs are an important part of the tumor microenvironment, and their interactions with cancer cells play an important role in the development and progression of cancer. Factors secreted by CAF include pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-8, which are associated with pro-tumor effects. It has been found that tumor-derived exosome miRNA-1247-3p can induce the activation of tumor-associated fibroblasts and make them secrete cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-8 to promote lung metastasis of liver cancer [35]. Meanwhile, many research findings indicate exosome-associated miRNA-9 and miRNA-200 s can promote normal fibroblast (NF) transformation into CAFs and facilitate metastasis [36, 37]. Multiple vascular support is necessary for cancer progression and can provide nutrition and growth factors for tumors. Previous studies have shown that the most important function of exosomal miRNAs secreted by tumor cells is to affect vascular remodeling through IL-8-activated VCAM-1. Additionally, exosomes-associated miRNA-526b and miRNA-655 induce angiogenesis as well as lymphangiogenesis [38], while miRNA-340-5p and miRNA-561 induce an immunosuppressive TME [39, 40].

Exosomal miRNAs in cancer treatment

Increasing evidence shows many small molecule substances can be effectively used to cure various cancers [41]. The key point is how to transport these substances to treat cancers at different sites. Many evidences indicate more than one trillion exosomes from other individuals have been injected to patients without matching inter-patient human leukocyte antigen (HLA), with no overt immune toxicity detected in these patients [41]. MicroRNAs are about 19 to 25-nucleotide long, single-stranded, non-coding RNAs encoded by endogenous genes, which can regulate gene expression to participate in vital cell processes [42]. Although there are currently no miRNA drugs approved for clinical treatment because of low stability, unexpected immune responses and poor cell membrane penetration, packing miRNAs in exosomes could overcome the latter limitations and would be a promising therapeutic tool in various malignancies [43]. Findings reported by Hamideh and colleagues confirmed miRNA (miRNA)-21-sponge packed in exosomes can effectively suppress the growth of brain tumors [44]. Another research revealed exosomal miRNA-123a could suppress tumor growth and improve survival in experimental mice [45, 46]. Furthermore, exosomes were used as carriers to transport miRNA-134 to breast cancer cells, to suppress tumor growth and enhance sensitivity to some drugs [47]. With the rapidly developing gene-editing technology, CRISPR-Cas9 combined with exosomes miRNAs would dramatically improve cancer treatment [48].

Exosomal miRNAs in cancer resistance

In recent years many drugs have been approved for the clinical treatment of various cancers. However, the most significant reason for failed therapy is cancer cell resistance to therapeutics. The causes of drug resistance are mainly included in the following two points: (1) genetic and/or phenotypic alterations (intrinsic resistance); (2) interaction with the TME (extrinsic resistance) [49]. Exosomal miRNAs substantially contribute to both intrinsic and extrinsic resistance mechanisms (Hazlehurst and Dalton 2001; Meads et al. 2009). The detailed mechanism of therapy resistance can be summarized as anti-apoptotic signaling, enhanced DNA repair or ABC transporter delivery to drug-sensitive cells [49].

P-glycoprotein (P-gp), the most critical drug transporter known to date, is a product of the multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) gene. Over 50% of cancers with the multiple drug resistance (MDR) phenotype express this protein [50]. P-gp’s half-life approximates 14-17 h; however, Levchenko et al. indicated exosomal P-gp lasting for about 4 months can confer tumor cells a longer acquired resistance phenotype [51]. Emerging evidence demonstrates P-gp-related exosomal miRNAs can lead to long-term P-gp expression in recipient cells [52]. For example, exosomal miRNA-451 and miRNA-27a are abundant in recipient cells, which could explain these long-term effects [53].

Exosomal miRNAs can regulate the cell cycle and cause anti-apoptotic pathways to confer resistance to therapy-sensitive tumor cells [52]. Via downregulation of the PTEN pathway, upregulated exosomal miRNA-222 can lead to cell cycle arrest in breast cancer cells, which can confer resistance to drug-sensitive tumors [23]. Another research demonstrated colorectal cancer cells can secrete exosomal miRNA-145/-34a that can decrease apoptosis to lead to 5-fluorouracil resistance of these cells [54].

According to Mutschelknaus et al. [55], exosomal miRNAs may participate in the progress of DNA repair, potentially leading to resistance in malignant cells. There are few reports examining the mechanism of exosomal miRNAs. Further studies should focus on this research area.

Exosomal miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic markers in cancer

The proportions of miRNAs are elevated in exosomes compared with their cells of origin [56]. As miRNAs in exosomes are shielded from RNase degradation because of lipid bilayer protection, they show higher stability in serum exosomes. Consequently, applying exosomal miRNAs as molecular markers for the diagnosis of diseases is an ongoing hot research topic. Exosomal miRNAs from malignant cells act as novel molecular markers to monitor cancer progression and treatment efficacy thanks to the following features: (1) exosomes secreted by cancer cells contain cancer-related proteins, RNAs and DNA fragments useful for cancer detection [57]; (2) the membrane structure of exosomes can enhance the stability of miRNAs, which in turn enhances their potential as biomarkers in diseases. Compared with miRNAs in cells and plasma, circulating exosome-derived miRNAs have a better anti-degradation ability [58]; (3) exosomes are broadly found in various body fluids (even the cerebrospinal fluid) and are easily accessible for clinical detection [59]; and (4) blood constituents are complex, which dilutes specific cancer-associated proteins, making it difficult to detect cancer proteins at an early stage or in case of low expression. More than 109/ML circulating exosomes are found in humans. After purification, a large number of exosomes could be collected, from which cancer-associated exosomes are obtained. Consequently, exosomes can be detected in vivo with high sensitivity, enabling early diagnosis in cancer [60]. On the basis of the above characteristics, exosomal miRNAs have tremendous potential as molecular markers of cancer, which could help in diagnostic and prognostic possesses (Table 1).

Table 1 Exosomal miRNAs as prognostic molecular markers

Expression of exosomal miRNAs in cancers

Respiratory system cancer

Previous studies have reported the importance of exosomes in the pathogenetic mechanisms of lung cancer, from initiation to metastasis [61]. Exosomes contribute to multiple functions and intrinsic pathways in malignant cells, and are considered valuable molecular markers [62]. Recent evidence suggests exosomal miRNAs could be utilized as diagnostic markers in lung cancer [58, 63, 64].

MiRNA-361-3p and miRNA-625 found in the blood assisted in differentiating malignant lung cancer from benign lung lesions [65]. In addition, upregulation of miRNA-21 in the blood was shown to be a reliable biomarker for the early diagnosis of squamous cell lung cancer. MiRNA-122-5p is markedly elevated in exosomes from lung cancer cases compared with the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [66]. The levels of serum miRNA-200b-5p, miRNA-378, miRNA-502-5p, miRNA-629, miRNA-17 and miRNA-100 are remarkably higher in individuals with lung adenocarcinoma compared with pulmonary granuloma cases as well as healthy smokers [67]. High miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 amounts in lung cancer exosomes have been considered potential biomarkers for diagnosing lung cancer [68, 69]. The levels of miRNAs, including miRNA-205, miRNA-19a, miRNA-19b, miRNA-30b and miRNA-20a, were shown to be significantly decreased after operation [70]. Extraction of exocrine miRNAs from peripheral blood, BALF and other bodily fluids can be used to detect miRNAs, and exhaled gas concentrates can also contain biomarkers that may help diagnose lung diseases [71]. In proteomics-based mass spectrometry analysis, urinary exosomes were remarkably more efficient in expressing leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases compared with normal control individuals. Munagala and colleagues [72] studied serum exosomal miRNAs for diagnosing recurrent lung cancer. They observed expression changes for 77 miRNAs in in vitro cell culture and animal models. Of these, 47 were upregulated and 30 were downregulated. MiRNA-21 and miRNA-155 showed significant upregulation in recurrent tumors in comparison with primary tumors. These data suggested serum exogenous miRNAs might be used for non-invasive diagnosis of primary and recurrent lung cancers. In recent years, peripheral blood exosomes were shown to have 30 specific molecular markers. Thus, exosomes and associated molecules may provide a theoretical basis for determining biomarkers for diagnosing lung cancer at an early stage.

Digestive system cancer

Gastrointestinal cancer represents one of the commonest malignancies. Nearly 300,000 people die of gastrointestinal cancer every year in the world. The severity of digestive tract cancer lies not only in its high morbidity and mortality rates, but also in the fact that 85% of digestive tract cancer cases are diagnosed in the middle and late stages. The probability of cure is often very low in this cancer type. Therefore, early diagnosis is the most effective way to reduce the mortality rate of patients with digestive tract cancer. According to recent reports, exosomes could provide means for early diagnosis in gastrointestinal cancer.

Liver cancer and cholangiocarcinoma

A recent report demonstrated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases have significantly increased levels of exosomal miRNA-665 compared with healthy individuals. In the latter patients, the levels of exosomal miRNA-665 showed relationships with tumor size and clinical stage. This suggested that exosomal miRNA-665 may be a suitable biomarker for HCC diagnosis and prognosis [73]. Sugimachi [74] compared serum exosome-derived miRNA levels between patients with HCC and normal people, and found serum miRNA-718 amounts were significantly decreased in HCC cases. Another study showed miRNA-638 suppression has negative associations with tumor size, vascular invasion and tumor stage, predicting low patient survival in HCC [73]. In another research, serum exosomal miRNA-122, miRNA-148a and miRNA-1246 amounts were starkly elevated in HCC in comparison with liver cirrhosis (LC) cases and healthy control (NC) groups [73]. Another work revealed that miRNA-101, miRNA-106b, miRNA-122 and miRNA-195 amounts in serum exosomes are significantly reduced in HCC cases compared with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, while miRNA-18a, miRNA-222, miRNA-221 and miRNA-224 were markedly elevated in HCC cases compared with CHB or LC patients. Furthermore, serum-circulating miRNAs showed no significant differences between CHB and HCC cases. The above data suggested serum exosomal miRNAs could better distinguish HCC from CHB or LC in comparison with serum miRNAs [75, 76]. A report showed serum exosomal miRNA-21 levels not only are higher in HCC cases compared with CHB or healthy control individuals, but are also closely correlated with cirrhosis and advanced tumor stage. Although circulating miRNA-21 showed a similar trend, it was less sensitive in detecting tumors than serum exosomal miRNA-21. These findings demonstrated serum exosomal miRNA-21 could act as a new index with higher sensitivity compared with whole serum miRNA-21 in HCC detection [76,77,78,79].

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the deadliest cancers, with high incidence worldwide. GC ranks fourth and second among cancers in terms of global incidence and mortality, respectively [80]. As carriers, exosomes have critical functions in interactions among malignant cells, vascular endothelial cells and macrophages. GC cell-derived exosomes activate NF-κB signaling in macrophages to induce tumor progression [81]. It was shown metastatic GC AZ-P7a cells release let-7 miRNA through exosomes for maintaining oncogenesis [82]. Elevated amounts of let-7 miRNA family members in AZ-P7a cell-derived exosomes might reflect GC metastasis. CD97 induces the proliferative and invasive potential of GC cells in vitro via exosome-mediated MAPK signaling, likely involving exosomal miRNAs [83].

It is imperative to determine the potential role of exosomal miRNAs in the peritoneal fluid in predicting GC dissemination in the peritoneum. Exosomal miRNA amounts were assessed by Agilent Human miRNA microarrays and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in 24 peritoneal lavage fluid (PLF) specimens, 6 gastric malignant ascites (MA) samples and culture supernatants (CM). The data identified 5 miRNAs (miRNA-1225-5p, miRNA-320c, miRNA-1202, miRNA-1207-5p, and miRNA-4270) with elevated amounts in MA specimens, PLF samples from serosa-invasive GC cases, and CM of highly metastatic GC cells. MiRNA-21 and miRNA-1225-5p also showed an association with serosal invasion in GC. These results suggested that miRNA-21 and miRNA-1225-5p could represent molecular markers of peritoneal recurrence following curative GC resection. Thus, a new strategy for detecting peritoneal dissemination of GC in the early stage has been put forward [84].

Colorectal cancer

Microarray analysis was performed in 88 primary colorectal cancer cases and 11 control subjects with serum samples rich in exogenous miRNAs [85]. Differences in microarray analysis between the experimental and control groups were compared with the data of 29 patients after tumor resection. Meanwhile, the miRNAs retained as molecular markers were compared to CA-199 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for sensitivity. The results showed that the amounts of 7 miRNAs, i.e., let-7a, miRNA-1229, miRNA-1246, miRNA-150, miRNA-21, miRNA-223 and miRNA-23a, were markedly elevated in patients with primary colorectal cancer compared with healthy controls, but starkly reduced upon tumor resection. In stage I colorectal cancer patients, miRNA-23a and miRNA-1246 had higher sensitivities compared with CA-199 and CEA, i.e., 95.5% and 92%, respectively. The exosomal amounts of the miRNA-17-92a cluster in serum showed a correlation with colorectal cancer recurrence. Serum exosomal miRNA-19a amounts were remarkably elevated in colorectal cancer cases in comparison with healthy controls. In addition, colorectal cancer cases with elevated exosomal miRNA-19a amounts showed poorer prognosis in comparison with the low expression group. It has also been found that tumor-derived exosome Mir-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization and promotes liver metastasis of colorectal cancer [86].

In a research assessing tumor markers [87], let-7a, miRNA-1229, miRNA-1246, miRNA-150, miRNA-21, miRNA-223 and miRNA-23a in exosomes showed close associations with the occurrence of colon cancer. A comparison of 27 recurrence cases with 57 patients without recurrence identified about 145 differentially miRNAs. MiRNA-4772-3p had significant downregulation, which showed a significant correlation with elevated risk of disease recurrence and poor prognosis. Low amounts of serum exosomal miRNA-4772-3p could predict tumor recurrence in stage-II and III colon cancer [88].

Pancreatic cancer

Studying gastrointestinal cancer [89] showed that a variety of miRNAs in serum exosomes, and found that the expression of miRNA-1246, miRNA-4644, miRNA-3976 and miRNA-4306 was increased significantly in pancreatic cancer patients, while the expression of these miRNAs in the control group remained very low. CA19-9 is still regarded as the serum biomarker with highest reliability in diagnosing pancreatic cancer, but can be combined with other diagnostic tools, including serum miRNAs in pancreatic cancer patients to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors or inflammation.

Nervous system Cancer

According to a recent study, serum exosomal miRNAs in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder cases showed significant variations from those of matched controls [90, 91]. In addition, schizophrenic individuals had high exosomal amounts of miRNA-497; similarly, increased exosomal amounts of miRNA-29c were detected in bipolar disorder cases. In studies assessing biomarkers showing correlations with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) diagnosis, a 7-miRNA AD-associated signature was derived using machine learning to predict AD status with 83 to 89% accuracy [92]. Studies identifying neurodegeneration-associated exosomal miRNAs in the cerebrospinal fluid might analyze the usefulness of exosomes as potential biomarker carriers in neurodegenerative pathologies. MiRNA-193b overexpression could suppress amyloid precursor protein (APP) expression, showing that miRNA-193b might contribute to neurodegeneration, with a potential to act as an important AD biomarker [93]. Furthermore, miRNA-193b was detected in hippocampal specimens from AD mice. Intriguingly, in a study examining Parkinson’s disease (PD), profiling of exosomal miRNAs was effective in differentiating PD and AD [94]. Exosomal miRNA biomarkers may assist in predicting future cognitive declination in asymptomatic people as well as disease progression in early dementia cases.

Genitourinary system cancers

Renal cell carcinoma

Research on miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma mainly describes their importance in differentiating tumor tissues from the renal parenchyma, histological classification and renal cell carcinoma prognosis. A study discussed the detection of urinary miRNAs in patients with renal cell carcinoma [95]. As a suppressor gene in renal cell carcinoma, miRNA-15a promotes apoptosis and inhibits cell proliferation by closely binding to α-isoprotease C (PKCα). PKCα directly inhibits the release from the nucleus of pri-microNA-15a, which is the primary transcript of miRNA-15a, reduces PKCα, and increases the levels of miRNA-15a. In biopsy and urine samples, upregulation of miRNA-15a might also act as an important index for differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma from noncancerous kidney tumors.

Prostate cancer

A previous study reported exosomal miRNA-1246 is promising in detecting prostate cancer, and has a potential in predicting disease aggressiveness [96]. Another study showed plasma exosomal miRNA-1290 and miR-320a-3p and miR-155-5p act as potent markers for predicting prognosis in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) [97]. However, prospective validation is further needed to develop these candidate miRNAs. In addition, Cox regression analysis revealed associations of miRNA-1290, miRNA-1246 and miRNA-375 with overall survival (OS). High miRNA-1290 and miRNA-375 amounts showed significant associations with reduced OS during follow-up. Incorporating miRNA-1290/miRNA-375 into potential clinical prognostic factor-based models in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer stage significantly improved the predictive performance.

Bryant and colleagues [98] carried out RT-PCR to examine various miRNAs in plasma exosomes from 78 prostate cancer cases and 28 healthy controls, and showed that 11 miRNAs had significant increases in prostate cancer. MiRNA-141 and miRNA-375 might be used as diagnostic markers in prostate cancer [99]. Li and collaborators [100] assessed the feasibility of exogenous miRNAs in prostate cancer diagnosis. They separated and extracted exosomal miRNAs from serum specimens obtained from prostate cancer cases, individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia and healthy people to analyze the levels of miRNA-141. As a result, miRNA-141 amounts in the prostate cancer group were significantly higher than those of the benign prostatic hyperplasia and control groups, and miRNA-141 amounts were markedly elevated in metastatic prostate cancer cases compared with non-metastatic prostate cancer cases. Therefore, exosomal miRNA-141 might be considered a good diagnostic and differential tool in urinary system tumors.

Ovarian cancer

Taylor's team was among the first to show that circulating exosomal miRNAs could be utilized to diagnose ovarian cancer [101]. They found significant differences in the miRNA profiles of blood exosomes between ovarian cancer cases and healthy individuals, indicating that exosomes may assist in diagnosing ovarian cancer. Moreover, it was found that miRNAs isolated from tumor-derived exosomes in serum show a good correlation with those extracted from ovarian cancer tissues. In addition, the miRNAs profiles of patient and normal control groups were analyzed, and the results showed significant differences. There were 8 miRNAs (miRNA-21, miRNA-141, miRNA-200a, miRNA-200b, miRNA-200c, miRNA-203, miRNA-205 and miRNA-214) considered to be useful for the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer. No significant differences in serum amounts were detected between early and advanced ovarian cancer cases, but benign and malignant tumors showed overt differences. These results indicated exosomal miRNAs could act as a useful tool for diagnosing ovarian cancer early. Serum miRNA-1290 showed significant elevation in individuals with high-grade serous ovarian cancer, and could distinguish these patients from individuals with cancers of different histological types. Thus, miRNA-1290 is regarded as a novel biomarker for HGSOC detection [102].

Meng and co-workers [103] measured the levels of miRNAs in serum exosomes from epithelial ovarian cancer cases. As a result, total exosomal miRNA expression was markedly elevated in ovarian cancer cases compared with healthy women, and miRNA-373, miRNA-200a, miRNA-200b and miRNA-200c were highly regulated. Therefore, miRNA-200a, miRNA-200b and miRNA-200c might be used to differentiate benign from malignant tumors, and the elevated serum levels of miRNA-200b and miRNA-200c showed close associations with CA125 and shorter survival. Generally speaking, the amounts of exogenous miRNAs are closely related to ovarian cancer development.

A study [104] demonstrated serum exosomal miRNA-375 and miRNA-1307 are markedly upregulated in ovarian cancer cases in comparison with the ovarian benign tumor and healthy groups. MiRNA-375 and miR-1307 are associated with lymph node metastasis and tumor staging in ovarian cancer, respectively. The upregulated miRNAs had independent diagnostic potential and increased the diagnostic accuracy of routine molecular markers such as CA-125 and HE4.

In high risk cervical cancer patients, well-run screening programs resulted in sharply decreased cervical cancer incidence and mortality [105]. Multiple cancers actively release miRNAs carried by exosomes. This review assessed the associations of miRNAs with cervical cancer-derived exosomes, which are abundant in the cervico-vaginal lavage in which exosomal miRNAs could be detected by electron microscopy, RT-qPCR and miRNA target reporter assays. MiRNA-21 and miRNA-146a, upregulated in cervical cancer cases, showed an association with elevated amounts of cervical cancer-derived exosomes. These findings suggested abnormally elevated miRNA-21 and miRNA-146a amounts in cervical cancer-derived exosomes, with the above two miRNAs playing functional roles in 293T cells.

Other cancers

Roccaro and colleagues [106] analyzed the miRNA compositions of exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in healthy individuals and multiple myeloma cases by the miRNA chip assay. As a result, miRNA-15a amounts in the multiple myeloma group were significantly downregulated, which requires further exploration. Suo and colleagues found close correlations with the characteristics of multiple myeloma.

The levels of miRNA-1246 and miRNA-21 in plasma exosomes of breast cancer cases were significantly increased in comparison with those of healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed combined plasma exosomal miRNA-1246 and miRNA-21 levels better reflected breast cancer than each individual level alone [23, 107]. Another study showed that exosomal miRNA-105 amounts are elevated in metastatic breast cancer cases compared with non-metastatic cases and healthy controls. Similarly, elevated miRNA-222 amounts were detected in luminal A versus luminal B tumor subtypes as well as in basal-like cells. Exosomal miRNA-222 amounts showed correlations with clinical and pathological parameters. During treatment, the levels of exosomal miRNA-21 had a direct correlation with tumor size and an inverse correlation with Ki67 amounts. In addition, high exosomal miRNA-21, miRNA-155 and miRNA-222 amounts were closely associated with the presence of circulating tumor cells.

Future perspectives

Diagnosing cancer at an early stage could reduce disease-related deaths and extend the lifespan. Exosomes have become a hot research topic as a biomarker for diagnosing multiple diseases. Previous researches have revealed that miRNAs enclosed in exosomes could escape immune attacks and cross the blood–brain barrier. In addition, exosomes prevents the clearance and/or damage of miRNAs by complement fixation and macrophages because of their double-layered membrane and size in the nanometer range, prolonging their circulatory half-life and improving clinical diagnosis. Mounting evidence indicates exosomal miRNAs are circulating diagnostic markers for different types of cancer [108]. The unique features of miRNAs in exosomes could be modified to increase their diagnostic efficacy for use as ideal tools for non-invasive screening and targeting of cancer cells in clinic. Several reviews discussing serum exosomal miRNAs in multiple malignancies are available. However, utilizing exosomes and their cargo as a diagnostic and monitoring tool for diseases remains challenging, requiring further investigation. Meanwhile, accurate purification, identification and high-throughput use of extracellular vesicles in clinic face enormous challenges. Further developing tumor exosomal miRNAs and improving microfluidics for exosome detection could improve their use for diagnosing cancer.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

CAF:

Cancer-associated fibroblast

CEA:

Carcinoembryonic antigen

CHB:

Chronic hepatitis B

CM:

Culture supernatants

CRISPR:

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats

CRPC:

Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

ESCC:

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

GC:

Gastric cancer

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

hnRNP:

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein

LC:

Liver cirrhosis

LRG1:

Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein

MA:

Malignant ascites

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MDR:

Multidrug resistance

Mef2c:

Myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2c

miRISC:

MiRNA induced silencing complex

NC:

Normal control

NF:

Normal fibroblast

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

nSMase2:

Neural sphingomyelinase 2

PD:

Parkinson’s disease

PI3K:

Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase

PKCα:

α-Isoprotease C

PLF:

Peritoneal lavage fluid

pri-miRNAs:

Primary miRNAs

PTEN:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten

TEXs:

Tumor-derived exosomes

TGF-β:

Transforming growth factor-β

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

TME:

Tumor microenvironment

ZO-I:

Zonula occludens-I

References

  1. 1.

    Cully M. Exosome-based candidates move into the clinic. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(1):6–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wei H, Chen Q, Lin L, et al. Regulation of exosome production and cargo sorting. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(1):163–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fasken MB, Morton DJ, Kuiper EG, et al. The RNA exosome and human disease. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2062:3–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dong Z, Gu H, Guo Q, et al. Profiling of serum exosome MiRNA reveals the potential of a MiRNA panel as diagnostic biomarker for alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2021;58(7):3084–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chen J, Li C, Li R, et al. Exosomes in HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2021;16(5):262–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Fan J, Lee CS, Kim S, et al. Generation of small RNA-modulated exosome mimetics for bone regeneration. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):11973–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wozniak AL, Adams A, King KE, et al. The RNA binding protein FMR1 controls selective exosomal miRNA cargo loading during inflammation. J Cell Biol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201912074.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhu J, Lu K, Zhang N, et al. Myocardial reparative functions of exosomes from mesenchymal stem cells are enhanced by hypoxia treatment of the cells via transferring microRNA-210 in an nSMase2-dependent way. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(8):1659–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Koppers-Lalic D, Hackenberg M, Bijnsdorp IV, et al. Nontemplated nucleotide additions distinguish the small RNA composition in cells from exosomes. Cell Rep. 2014;8(6):1649–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhou X, Wang L, Zou W, et al. hnRNPA2B1 associated with recruitment of RNA into exosomes plays a key role in herpes simplex virus 1 release from infected cells. J Virol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00367-20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Klum SM, Chandradoss SD, Schirle NT, et al. Helix-7 in Argonaute2 shapes the microRNA seed region for rapid target recognition. Embo J. 2018;37(1):75–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cheng Q, Li X, Wang Y, et al. The ceramide pathway is involved in the survival, apoptosis and exosome functions of human multiple myeloma cells in vitro. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2018;39(4):561–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun Z, Shi K, Yang S, et al. Effect of exosomal miRNA on cancer biology and clinical applications. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):147.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wu L, Wang Y, Xu X, et al. Aptamer-based detection of circulating targets for precision medicine. Chem Rev. 2021;121(19):12035–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nahand JS, Vandchali NR, Darabi H, et al. Exosomal microRNAs: novel players in cervical cancer. Epigenomics. 2020;12(18):1651–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chen S, Chen X, Luo Q, et al. Retinoblastoma cell-derived exosomes promote angiogenesis of human vesicle endothelial cells through microRNA-92a-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(7):695.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fabbri M, Paone A, Calore F, et al. MicroRNAs bind to Toll-like receptors to induce prometastatic inflammatory response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(31):E2110–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mori MA, Ludwig RG, Garcia-Martin R, et al. Extracellular miRNAs: from biomarkers to mediators of physiology and disease. Cell Metab. 2019;30(4):656–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Milman N, Ginini L, Gil Z. Exosomes and their role in tumorigenesis and anticancer drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2019;45:1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee JU, Kim WH, Lee HS, et al. Quantitative and specific detection of exosomal miRNAs for accurate diagnosis of breast cancer using a surface-enhanced raman scattering sensor based on plasmonic head-flocked gold nanopillars. Small. 2019;15(17):e1804968.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    De Silva N, Samblas M, Martínez JA, Milagro FI. Effects of exosomes from LPS-activated macrophages on adipocyte gene expression, differentiation, and insulin-dependent glucose uptake. J Physiol Biochem. 2018;74(4):559–68.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pascut D, Pratama MY, Vo NVT, et al. The crosstalk between tumor cells and the microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of exosomal microRNAs and their clinical implications. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(4):823.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Rodríguez-Martínez A, de Miguel-Pérez D, Ortega FG, et al. Exosomal miRNA profile as complementary tool in the diagnostic and prediction of treatment response in localized breast cancer under neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhao Z, Yang S, Zhou A, et al. Small extracellular vesicles in the development, diagnosis, and possible therapeutic application of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:732702.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tan S, Xia L, Yi P, et al. Exosomal miRNAs in tumor microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Tai YL, Chen KC, Hsieh JT, Shen TL. Exosomes in cancer development and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(8):2364–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Rajagopal C, Harikumar KB. The origin and functions of exosomes in cancer. Front Oncol. 2018;8:66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bebelman MP, Smit MJ, Pegtel DM, Baglio SR. Biogenesis and function of extracellular vesicles in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;188:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wang X, Luo G, Zhang K, et al. Hypoxic tumor-derived exosomal miR-301a mediates M2 macrophage polarization via PTEN/PI3Kγ to promote pancreatic cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2018;78(16):4586–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chen X, Zhou J, Li X, et al. Exosomes derived from hypoxic epithelial ovarian cancer cells deliver microRNAs to macrophages and elicit a tumor-promoted phenotype. Cancer Lett. 2018;435:80–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Conti I, Varano G, Simioni C, et al. miRNAs as influencers of cell-cell communication in tumor microenvironment. Cells. 2020;9(1):220.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kanchan RK, Siddiqui JA, Mahapatra S, et al. microRNAs orchestrate pathophysiology of breast cancer brain metastasis: advances in therapy. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Slack FJ, Chinnaiyan AM. The role of non-coding RNAs in oncology. Cell. 2019;179(5):1033–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Uddin MN, Li M, Wang X. Identification of transcriptional markers and microRNA-mRNA regulatory networks in colon cancer by integrative analysis of mrna and microrna expression profiles in colon tumor stroma. Cells. 2019;8(9):1054.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang J, De Veirman K, Faict S, et al. Multiple myeloma exosomes establish a favourable bone marrow microenvironment with enhanced angiogenesis and immunosuppression. J Pathol. 2016;239(2):162–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Baroni S, Romero-Cordoba S, Plantamura I, et al. Exosome-mediated delivery of miR-9 induces cancer-associated fibroblast-like properties in human breast fibroblasts. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(7):e2312.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tang X, Hou Y, Yang G, et al. Stromal miR-200s contribute to breast cancer cell invasion through CAF activation and ECM remodeling. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(1):132–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hunter S, Nault B, Ugwuagbo KC, et al. Mir526b and Mir655 promote tumour associated angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(7):938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen EB, Zhou ZJ, Xiao K, et al. The miR-561-5p/CX(3)CL1 signaling axis regulates pulmonary metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma involving CX(3)CR1(+) natural killer cells infiltration. Theranostics. 2019;9(16):4779–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Liu Y, Li X, Zhang Y, et al. An miR-340-5p-macrophage feedback loop modulates the progression and tumor microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme. Oncogene. 2019;38(49):7399–415.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6977.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Saliminejad K, Khorram Khorshid HR, Soleymani Fard S, Ghaffari SH. An overview of microRNAs: biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(5):5451–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wang P, Zhou Y, Richards AM. Effective tools for RNA-derived therapeutics: siRNA interference or miRNA mimicry. Theranostics. 2021;11(18):8771–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Monfared H, Jahangard Y, Nikkhah M, et al. Potential therapeutic effects of exosomes packed with a miR-21-sponge construct in a rat model of glioblastoma. Front Oncol. 2019;9:782.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lang FM, Hossain A, Gumin J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as natural biofactories for exosomes carrying miR-124a in the treatment of gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(3):380–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yang Y, Yujiao W, Fang W, et al. The roles of miRNA, lncRNA and circRNA in the development of osteoporosis. Biol Res. 2020;53(1):40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yang C, Zhang G, Zhang Y, et al. Exosome miR-134-5p restrains breast cancer progression via regulating PI3K/AKT pathway by targeting ARHGAP1. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021;47(11):4037–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li Z, Zhou X, Wei M, et al. In vitro and in vivo RNA inhibition by CD9-HuR functionalized exosomes encapsulated with miRNA or CRISPR/dCas9. Nano Lett. 2019;19(1):19–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Steinbichler TB, Dudás J, Skvortsov S, et al. Therapy resistance mediated by exosomes. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Creemers SG, van Koetsveld PM, De Herder WW, et al. MDR1 inhibition increases sensitivity to doxorubicin and etoposide in adrenocortical cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2019;26(3):367–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Levchenko A, Mehta BM, Niu X, et al. Intercellular transfer of P-glycoprotein mediates acquired multidrug resistance in tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(6):1933–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Wang B, Zhang Y, Ye M, et al. Cisplatin-resistant MDA-MB-231 cell-derived exosomes increase the resistance of recipient cells in an exosomal miR-423-5p-dependent manner. Curr Drug Metab. 2019;20(10):804–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhao Y, Fu Y, Zou M, et al. Analysis of deep sequencing exosome-microRNA expression profile derived from CP-II reveals potential role of gga-miRNA-451 in inflammation. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(11):6178–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Akao Y, Khoo F, Kumazaki M, et al. Extracellular disposal of tumor-suppressor miRs-145 and -34a via microvesicles and 5-FU resistance of human colon cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(1):1392–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mutschelknaus L, Peters C, Winkler K, et al. Exosomes derived from squamous head and neck cancer promote cell survival after ionizing radiation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0152213.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Simpson RJ, Kalra H, Mathivanan S. ExoCarta as a resource for exosomal research. J Extracell Vesicles. 2012;1:18374.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kok VC, Yu CC. Cancer-derived exosomes: their role in cancer biology and biomarker development. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:8019–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Hu C, Meiners S, Lukas C, et al. Role of exosomal microRNAs in lung cancer biology and clinical applications. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(6):e12828.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Manna I, Iaccino E, Dattilo V, et al. Exosome-associated miRNA profile as a prognostic tool for therapy response monitoring in multiple sclerosis patients. Faseb J. 2018;32(8):4241–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Głuszko A, Szczepański MJ, Ludwig N, et al. Exosomes in cancer: circulating immune-related biomarkers. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1628029.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Xu K, Zhang C, Du T, et al. Progress of exosomes in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Tan C, Hu W, He Y, et al. Cytokine-mediated therapeutic resistance in breast cancer. Cytokine. 2018;108:151–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Li Y, Yin Z, Fan J, et al. The roles of exosomal miRNAs and lncRNAs in lung diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4:47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Wu J, Shen Z. Exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnostic and prognostic in lung cancer. Cancer Med. 2020;9(19):6909–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Roth C, Stückrath I, Pantel K, et al. Low levels of cell-free circulating miR-361–3p and miR-625* as blood-based markers for discriminating malignant from benign lung tumors. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(6):e38248.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kim JE, Eom JS, Kim WY, et al. Diagnostic value of microRNAs derived from exosomes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: a pilot study. Thorac Cancer. 2018;9(8):911–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Cazzoli R, Buttitta F, Di Nicola M, et al. microRNAs derived from circulating exosomes as noninvasive biomarkers for screening and diagnosing lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(9):1156–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Gao Z, Yuan H, Mao Y, et al. In situ detection of plasma exosomal microRNA for lung cancer diagnosis using duplex-specific nuclease and MoS(2) nanosheets. Analyst. 2021;146(6):1924–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bansal S, Itabashi Y, Perincheri S, et al. The role of miRNA-155 in the immunopathogenesis of obliterative airway disease in mice induced by circulating exosomes from human lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Cell Immunol. 2020;355:104172.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Aushev VN, Zborovskaya IB, Laktionov KK, et al. Comparisons of microRNA patterns in plasma before and after tumor removal reveal new biomarkers of lung squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e78649.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Li W, Dai W, Liu M, et al. VOC biomarkers identification and predictive model construction for lung cancer based on exhaled breath analysis: research protocol for an exploratory study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e028448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Munagala R, Aqil F, Gupta RC. Exosomal miRNAs as biomarkers of recurrent lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):10703–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Li S, Yao J, Xie M, et al. Exosomal miRNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma development and clinical responses. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sugimachi K, Matsumura T, Hirata H, et al. Identification of a bona fide microRNA biomarker in serum exosomes that predicts hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(3):532–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Shi M, Jiang Y, Yang L, et al. Decreased levels of serum exosomal miR-638 predict poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(6):4711–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Suehiro T, Miyaaki H, Kanda Y, et al. Serum exosomal microRNA-122 and microRNA-21 as predictive biomarkers in transarterial chemoembolization-treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(3):3267–73.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Zhou Y, Ren H, Dai B, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-21 contributes to tumor progression by converting hepatocyte stellate cells to cancer-associated fibroblasts. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):324.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Lee YR, Kim G, Tak WY, et al. Circulating exosomal noncoding RNAs as prognostic biomarkers in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(6):1444–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Wang S, Yang Y, Sun L, et al. Exosomal microRNAs as liquid biopsy biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:2021–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, et al. Gastric cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genomic characteristics and treatment strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):4012.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Zhang X, Shi H, Yuan X, et al. Tumor-derived exosomes induce N2 polarization of neutrophils to promote gastric cancer cell migration. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Ohshima K, Inoue K, Fujiwara A, et al. Let-7 microRNA family is selectively secreted into the extracellular environment via exosomes in a metastatic gastric cancer cell line. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(10):e13247.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Li C, Liu DR, Li GG, et al. CD97 promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation and invasion through exosome-mediated MAPK signaling pathway. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(20):6215–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hu Y, Qi C, Liu X, et al. Malignant ascites-derived exosomes promote peritoneal tumor cell dissemination and reveal a distinct miRNA signature in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;457:142–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Santasusagna S, Moreno I, Navarro A, et al. Proteomic analysis of liquid biopsy from tumor-draining vein indicates that high expression of exosomal ECM1 is associated with relapse in stage I–III colon cancer. Transl Oncol. 2018;11(3):715–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Zhao S, Mi Y, Guan B, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization to promote liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):156.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Huang X, Yuan T, Tschannen M, et al. Characterization of human plasma-derived exosomal RNAs by deep sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:319.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Liu C, Eng C, Shen J, et al. Serum exosomal miR-4772-3p is a predictor of tumor recurrence in stage II and III colon cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(46):76250–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Xu YF, Xu X, Bhandari K, et al. Isolation of extra-cellular vesicles in the context of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: Addition of one stringent filtration step improves recovery of specific microRNAs. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259563.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Gruzdev SK, Yakovlev AA, Druzhkova TA, et al. The missing link: how exosomes and mirnas can help in bridging psychiatry and molecular biology in the context of depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39(6):729–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Du Y, Yu Y, Hu Y, et al. Genome-wide, integrative analysis implicates exosome-derived microRNA dysregulation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2019;45(6):1257–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Lugli G, Cohen AM, Bennett DA, et al. Plasma exosomal mirnas in persons with and without alzheimer disease: altered expression and prospects for biomarkers. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139233.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Liu CG, Zhao Y, Lu Y, Wang PC. ABCA1-labeled exosomes in serum contain higher microRNA-193b levels in alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5450397.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Wang L, Zhang L. Circulating exosomal miRNA as diagnostic biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Mytsyk Y, Dosenko V, Borys Y, et al. MicroRNA-15a expression measured in urine samples as a potential biomarker of renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(5):851–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Bhagirath D, Yang TL, Bucay N, et al. microRNA-1246 is an exosomal biomarker for aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(7):1833–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Ramirez-Garrastacho M, Berge V, Linē A, Llorente A. Potential of miRNAs in urinary extracellular vesicles for management of active surveillance in prostate cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01598-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Bryant RJ, Pawlowski T, Catto JW, et al. Changes in circulating microRNA levels associated with prostate cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(4):768–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Sharma N, Baruah MM. The microRNA signatures: aberrantly expressed miRNAs in prostate cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(2):126–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Li Z, Ma YY, Wang J, et al. Exosomal microRNA-141 is upregulated in the serum of prostate cancer patients. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:139–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Bhome R, Del Vecchio F, Lee GH, et al. Exosomal microRNAs (exomiRs): small molecules with a big role in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2018;420:228–35.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Kobayashi M, Sawada K, Nakamura K, et al. Exosomal miR-1290 is a potential biomarker of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and can discriminate patients from those with malignancies of other histological types. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11(1):81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Meng X, Müller V, Milde-Langosch K, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of circulating exosomal miR-373, miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-200c in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(13):16923–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Su YY, Sun L, Guo ZR, et al. Upregulated expression of serum exosomal miR-375 and miR-1307 enhance the diagnostic power of CA125 for ovarian cancer. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12(1):6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Pimple SA, Mishra GA. Global strategies for cervical cancer prevention and screening. Minerva Ginecol. 2019;71(4):313–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Roccaro AM, Sacco A, Maiso P, et al. BM mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes facilitate multiple myeloma progression. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(4):1542–55.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Abdulhussain MM, Hasan NA, Hussain AG. Interrelation of the circulating and tissue microRNA-21 with tissue PDCD4 expression and the invasiveness of Iraqi female breast tumors. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2019;34(1):26–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Xie Y, Dang W, Zhang S, et al. The role of exosomal noncoding RNAs in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Grossi I, Salvi A, Baiocchi G, Portolani N, De Petro G. Functional role of microRNA-23b-3p in cancer biology. Microrna. 2018;7:156–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Fan J, Xu G, Chang Z, et al. miR-210 transferred by lung cancer cell-derived exosomes may act as proangiogenic factor in cancer-associated fibroblasts by modulating JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Clin Sci (Lond). 2020;134(7):807–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Wu Q, Yu L, Lin X, et al. Combination of serum miRNAs with serum exosomal miRNAs in early diagnosis for non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:485–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Wang T, Li W, Li H, Li W. Dysregulation of exosomal miR-192 and miR-194 expression in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(3):1561–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Li J, Chen J, Wang S, et al. Blockage of transferred exosome-shuttled miR-494 inhibits melanoma growth and metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:15763–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Chiam K, Wang T, Watson DI, et al. Circulating serum exosomal miRNAs as potential biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(7):1208–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Li Q, Li B, Li Q, et al. Exosomal miR-21-5p derived from gastric cancer promotes peritoneal metastasis via mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(9):854.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Ma M, Chen S, Liu Z, et al. miRNA-221 of exosomes originating from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes oncogenic activity in gastric cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:4161–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Yoshida Y, Goi T, Kurebayashi H, et al. Prokineticin 2 expression as a novel prognostic biomarker for human colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2018;9(53):30079–91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Rotelli MT, Di Lena M, Cavallini A, et al. Fecal microRNA profile in patients with colorectal carcinoma before and after curative surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30(7):891–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Lin XJ, Fang JH, Yang XJ, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma cell-secreted exosomal microRNA-210 promotes angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;11:243–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Aucher A, Rudnicka D, Davis DM. MicroRNAs transfer from human macrophages to hepato-carcinoma cells and inhibit proliferation. J Immunol. 2013;191(12):6250–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Wang L, Wu J, Ye N, et al. Plasma-derived exosome MiR-19b acts as a diagnostic marker for pancreatic cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:739111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Zhou X, Lu Z, Wang T, et al. Plasma miRNAs in diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer: a miRNA expression analysis. Gene. 2018;673:181–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Rodríguez M, Bajo-Santos C, Hessvik NP, et al. Identification of non-invasive miRNAs biomarkers for prostate cancer by deep sequencing analysis of urinary exosomes. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):156.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Vlaeminck-Guillem V. Extracellular vesicles in prostate cancer carcinogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Front Oncol. 2018;8:222.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Nagata M, Muto S, Horie S. Molecular biomarkers in bladder cancer: novel potential indicators of prognosis and treatment outcomes. Dis Markers. 2016;2016:8205836.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Li W, Dong Y, Wang KJ, et al. Plasma exosomal miR-125a-5p and miR-141–5p as non-invasive biomarkers for prostate cancer. Neoplasma. 2020;67(6):1314–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Corcoran C, Rani S, O’Driscoll L. miR-34a is an intracellular and exosomal predictive biomarker for response to docetaxel with clinical relevance to prostate cancer progression. Prostate. 2014;74(13):1320–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    A comprehensive overview of exosomes in ovarian cancer: emerging biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.

  129. 129.

    Zhang S, Zhang X, Fu X, et al. Identification of common differentially-expressed miRNAs in ovarian cancer cells and their exosomes compared with normal ovarian surface epithelial cell cells. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(2):2391–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Vannini I, Fanini F, Fabbri M. Emerging roles of microRNAs in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;48:128–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Yuan X, Qian N, Ling S, et al. Breast cancer exosomes contribute to pre-metastatic niche formation and promote bone metastasis of tumor cells. Theranostics. 2021;11(3):1429–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Ung TH, Madsen HJ, Hellwinkel JE, et al. Exosome proteomics reveals transcriptional regulator proteins with potential to mediate downstream pathways. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(11):1384–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Yan W, Wu X, Zhou W, et al. Cancer-cell-secreted exosomal miR-105 promotes tumour growth through the MYC-dependent metabolic reprogramming of stromal cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(5):597–609.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Singh R, Pochampally R, Watabe K, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-10b promotes cell invasion in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:256.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Fong MY, Zhou W, Liu L, et al. Breast-cancer-secreted miR-122 reprograms glucose metabolism in premetastatic niche to promote metastasis. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17(2):183–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Le MT, Hamar P, Guo C, et al. miR-200-containing extracellular vesicles promote breast cancer cell metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(12):5109–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Wei Y, Lai X, Yu S, et al. Exosomal miR-221/222 enhances tamoxifen resistance in recipient ER-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147(2):423–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Yoshikawa M, Iinuma H, Umemoto Y, et al. Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-223-3p as a minimally invasive biomarker for the early detection of invasive breast cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(6):9584–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Wen Y, Chen R, Zhu C, et al. MiR-503 suppresses hypoxia-induced proliferation, migration and angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells by targeting Apelin. Peptides. 2018;105:58–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Moloudizargari M, Abdollahi M, Asghari MH, et al. The emerging role of exosomes in multiple myeloma. Blood Rev. 2019;38:100595.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Cerutti C, Edwards LJ, de Vries HE, et al. MiR-126 and miR-126* regulate shear-resistant firm leukocyte adhesion to human brain endothelium. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45284.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Ohyashiki JH, Umezu T, Ohyashiki K. Exosomes promote bone marrow angiogenesis in hematologic neoplasia: the role of hypoxia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23(3):268–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Farahani M, Rubbi C, Liu L, et al. CLL exosomes modulate the transcriptome and behaviour of recipient stromal cells and are selectively enriched in miR-202–3p. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0141429.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Chevillet JR, Kang Q, Ruf IK, et al. Quantitative and stoichiometric analysis of the microRNA content of exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(41):14888–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Eisenstein A, Gonzalez EC, Raghunathan R, et al. Emerging biomarkers in cutaneous melanoma. Mol Diagn Ther. 2018;22(2):203–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Gerloff D, Lützkendorf J, Moritz RKC, et al. Melanoma-derived exosomal miR-125b-5p educates tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) by targeting lysosomal acid lipase A (LIPA). Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(2):464.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Felicetti F, De Feo A, Coscia C, et al. Exosome-mediated transfer of miR-222 is sufficient to increase tumor malignancy in melanoma. J Transl Med. 2016;14:56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Konstatinell A, Coucheron DH, Sveinbjørnsson B, Moens U. MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers in merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(7):1873.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Pro. Chen Dexi for guidance.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (7212172), the Beijing Precision Medicine and Transformation Engineering Technology Research Center of Hepatitis and Liver Cancer, and the Pilot project of public welfare development and reform of Beijing Municipal Medical Research Institutes (2019-6).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LWH designed the manuscript, LCY and ZT were major contributors in writing the manuscript. CJ and LR made substantial contributions to the design of the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content. CH and LSM created all the figures. CDX performed literature search. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript. The order of the co–frst authors was determined based upon the order in which they began working on the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cao Cai or Weihua Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

The authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Zhou, T., Chen, J. et al. The role of Exosomal miRNAs in cancer. J Transl Med 20, 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03215-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03215-4

Keywords

  • Exosome
  • miRNAs
  • Cancer
  • Treatment resistance