Skip to main content


  • Review
  • Open Access

A quest for therapeutic antigens in bone and soft tissue sarcoma

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Translational Medicine20053:31

  • Received: 23 May 2005
  • Accepted: 08 August 2005
  • Published:


Over the past three decades, there have been remarkable advances in the treatment of bone and soft tissue sarcomas. These include the introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy, establishment of guidelines for adequate surgical margins, and the development of post-excision reconstruction. There have also been advances in the field of immunotherapy against bone and soft tissue sarcomas, which, unfortunately, have received less attention. However, lack of progress in chemotherapy-based treatments for bone and soft tissue sarcomas has reignited interest in immunotherapeutic approaches. Here we summarize current progress in the immunotherapy of bone and soft tissue sarcomas including the strategies utilized to identify tumor-associated antigens, and the design of clinical trials.


  • Osteosarcoma
  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma
  • Synovial Sarcoma
  • Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma
  • Autologous Tumor Cell


Bone and soft tissue sarcomas are aggressive malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin. Despite their low prevalence (approximately 1% of all malignant tumors), they include more than 60 histological subtypes [1, 2]. These subtypes are often associated with unique clinical, prognostic and therapeutic characteristics, leading to difficulties in identifying tumor-specific targets for immunotherapy and/or other therapeutic modalities. In contrast, about 10% of newly diagnosed cancers in children and adolescents constitute rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma, highlighting the weight that these three sarcomas play in pediatric oncology [3].

Until 1970, radical excision was the mainstay of treatment for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. This treatment had resulted in five-year survival rates of 10–20% in patients with osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma [3]. To improve such dismal treatment outcomes, efforts have been to foster two distinct approaches; chemotherapy and immunotherapy [4]. Early immunotherapeutic efforts consisted of tumor extracts or whole tumor cells used for direct autologous vaccination [5, 6] or allogeneic adoptive immunotherapy [7, 8] in patients with osteosarcoma. These limited trials suggested an increase in survival rate over surgery alone. However, the results were not as promising as those of chemotherapy trials conducted during the same period [9, 10]. Consequently chemotherapy has to date overshadowed immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with surgery has become the standard treatment of osteosarcoma and other pediatric sarcomas [1, 3].

With the technological advancements that lead to the identification of tumor antigens [11], immunotherapeutic approaches shifted from the usage of crude tumor extracts or tumor cells to well-characterized antigenic epitopes. In turn, peptide-based immunotherapy has allowed a more precise monitoring of immunological responses to vaccines. While progress has been made primarily in the context of other tumor models such as melanoma, the relative effectiveness of chemotherapy and practical difficulties in establishing autologous tumor-CTL pairs have delayed the interest in tumor antigen identification out of bone and soft tissue sarcomas [12]. This attitude has perpetuated until recently, when tumor-specific fusion genes resulting from chromosomal translocation were defined in soft tissue sarcomas and later proposed as candidate antigens [1315]. In addition, the authors' group recently identified an osteosarcoma antigen upon establishment of an autologous tumor-CTL pair [16, 17]. These insights have revived the interest to immunotherapeutic approaches to bone and soft tissue sarcomas based on molecularly defined targets.

Current multimodality treatment protocols including surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and radiotherapy yield five-year survival rates around 50–70% in patients with high-grade primary bone and soft tissue sarcomas [1, 3]. However, in the majority of cases, disease presenting with metastatic spread or relapses after primary treatment remains incurable, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments of bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Immunogenicity of bone and soft tissue sarcoma

Clinical observations

Efficacy of immunotherapy depends primarily on the inherent immunogenicity of the corresponding tumors. This can be partly predicted by clinical observations related to the natural behavior of immune responses of the host, such as infilitration of T lymphocytes in tumor tissues and spontaneous tumor regression. Infiltration of lymphocytes has been seen in a group of inflammatory soft tissue sarcomas, including inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors [18] and inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytomas [19]. However, lymphocytes infiltrating these tumors are considered to be attracted non-specifically by cyotokines produced by tumor cells and not by tumor antigens [20]. Besides inflammatory tumors, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were sporadically observed in soft tissue sarcomas [2123]. Notably, infiltration of dendritic cells was also reported in some soft tissue sarcomas with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia [23]. This suggests that presentation of tumor antigens may occur in the regional lymph nodes. To date, prognostic significance of lymphocyte- or dendritic cell-infiltration in bone and soft tissue sarcomas remains to be proved. Also, it remains unknown whether there are differences in the immunogenicity of sarcomas between children and adults.

Spontaneous tumor regression is far more rarely observed. To our knowledge, there are only two reported cases of spontaneously regressing osteosarcoma [24, 25]. These observations suggest the relatively low immunogenicity of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in natural conditions. Compared to malignant melanomas that are co-localized with Langerhans cells in the dermis and epidermis, there are few, if any, such immuno-surveillant cells in the deep tissues where sarcomas are developed. Such micro-environmental features may also be attributed to low immunogenicity of bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Laboratory observation

The identification of TIL suggests the question of whether antigen-specific CTL precursors exist in the peripheral blood of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas. CTL precursors could home to the tumor site or originate from the presentation of tumor antigens by antigen presenting cells in tumor draining lymph nodes. Two pioneering experimental observations [26, 27] answered this question. Ichino et al. [26] induced CTLs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of six patients with osteosarcoma, which specifically lysed fresh autologous tumor cells. Subsequently, Slovin et al. [27] developed CTL clones from one patient with osteosarcoma, and two patients with malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). We have also recently established three autologous tumor cell-CTL pairs from patients with osteosarcoma [16], MFH of the bone [28], and MFH of the soft tissue, respectively. In our experience, the main difficulty in identifying sarcoma-specific antigens comes from the poor adaptability of sarcoma cells to in vitro culture, while the induction of tumor-specific CTLs from peripheral blood mononuclear cells is relatively more reliable thanks for the advancement of techniques for in vitro T cell culture. In addition, the utilization of tumor-draining lymph node as a source of antigen-specific lymphocytes and the manipulation of co-stimulatory pathways such as B7/CD28 and 4-1BB/4-1BBL have enhanced the success rate of CTL induction [28, 29]. The efficacy in manipulation of costimulatory pathways to elicit immunological responses in vivo has been applied to animal models with osteosarcoma [3034] and used in clinical trials on patients with malignant melanoma [35, 36].

Another important advancement in the characterization of natural immune responses to sarcomas has come from the direct enumeration of tumor antigen-specific T cells in the circulation of patients with cancer. The introduction of HLA/peptide tetramer complexes technology [37] has made it possible to more precisely monitor the presence and frequency of circulating CTL precursors when the antigenic epitope and its associated HLA alleles is known. In this technology, soluble HLA/peptide complexes are assembled and biotinylated in vitro, and then are forced to form tetrameric arrays by addition of fluorescent-labeled avidin molecules. The HLA/peptide tetramer complexes bind to a T cell receptor on lymphocytes, which are visualized by FACS analysis. Using HLA-A24/SYT-SSX peptide tetramers, we observed an increased frequency of CTL precursors specific for SYT-SSX-derived antigenic peptides in patients with synovial sarcomas, compared to those with other sarcomas and healthy donors [3840]. In addition, increased in vivo frequency of CTL precursors recognizing SYT-SSX-derived peptides was significantly associated with present or past history of distant metastases [38]. Thus, aberrantly expressed SYT-SSX gene products are likely to have primed SYT-SSX-specific CTL precursors during the process of systemic tumor spreading. Furthermore, CTLs specific for HLA-A24-positive synovial sarcoma cells were inducible from PBLs of patients who showed increased frequency of CTL precursors in the HLA/peptide tetramer. Together, these findings suggest that SYT-SSX fusion gene products serve as the tumor associated antigen of synovial sarcoma.

Antigenic peptides in bone and soft tissue sarcomas

Derivatives of fusion gene product

Identification of tumor associated antigens and related antigenic peptides is the prerequisite for the development of the antigen-specific peptide-based immunotherapy. The discovery of tumor-specific chromosomal translocation and resultant fusion genes as a common event in various soft tissue sarcomas was a significant aid in antigen identification [1315]. Since the fusion regions of translocation products are strictly limited to the corresponding tumors [41] (Table 1), they serve as attractive targets for tumor antigen-specific therapies. This concept has been proven previously by the study of leukemias [42, 43].
Table 1

Chromosomal translocation and fusion gene in bone and soft tissue sarcoma


Choromosomal translocation

Fusion gene


Synovial sarcoma










Ewing sarcoma




















Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma








Myxoid liposarcoma




Clear cell sarcoma




Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans




A strategic scheme for identification of therapeutic antigens targeting fusion genes is shown in Fig. 1. Soft tissue sarcomas with defined chromosomal translocation may be subjected to search for putative antigenic sequences in the region spanning the fusion gene. This search is based on the recognition of anchor motifs for HLA class I allele commonly expressed by the population affected by the disease [44, 45]. This approach is commonly referred to as a "reverse immunology" [46, 47]. In this fashion, several antigenic peptides have been defined from SYT-SSX [38, 40, 48], EWS-FLI1 [49], and PAX3-FKHR [49] fusion gene products (Table 2).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Strategies for the identification of antigenic peptides from bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Table 2

Antigenic peptide in bone and soft tissue sarcoma



HLA allele

Peptide sequence*


Synovial sarcoma

SYT-SSX (SSX1,2,4)
















Ewing sarcoma

EWS-FLI1 (type 1)

A3, A31, B44




EWS-FLI1 (type 2)

A2, A3, A24, B7, B44, B62



Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma


A33, A68, B7




Papillomavirus binding factor




Peptide sequences shown to induce cytotoxic T lymphocites or those used in clinical trials are listed. Slash indicates the breakpoint.

Derivatives of lymphocyte-defined antigen

Bone and soft tissue sarcomas without known chromosomal translocation may be subjected to the "forward immunology approach" [46] (Fig. 1). This approach is based on the establishment of an autologous pair of tumor cells and tumor cell-reactive CTLs. When the first CTLs were expanded from patients with osteosarcoma [26, 27] and MFH [27], the expression cloning procedure for antigen identification [11] had not yet been identified. By using an autologous pair of osteosarcoma cell line and CTL clone [16], we identified an antigenic peptide derived from Papillomavirus binding factor (PBF) [17] (Table 2). PBF was originally defined as a transcriptional regulator of genomic DNA of the human papillomavirus type 8 [50]. The role of PBF in bone and soft tissue sarcomas still remains uncertain. Nevertheless, PBF was found to be expressed in 57/76 cases of bone and soft tissue sarcomas (11/14 osteosarcomas) and 20/34 of epithelial carcinomas by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Immunostaining with anti-PBF antibody was positive in 45/51 bone and soft tissue sarcoma tissues (16/20 osteosarcoma), whereas it was weak and restricted in the cytoplasm of the normal organs tested including ovary, pancreas, and liver [17]. Although PBF could represent a universal target for active specific immunization because of the frequency and relative selectivity of its expression, its utilization is limited by the rarity of the HLA allele in association with whom its discovery occurred. The recognition by the original CTL of the paired autologous tumor cells was associated to HLA-B55. Given the low prevalence of the HLA-B55 allele, the identified antigenic epitope is not clinically applicable to a broad range of patients. Currently the antigenicity of other PBF-derived peptides with high affinity for the HLA-A2 and HLA-A24 alleles, common in both the Japanese and Caucasian population, are being evaluated for future clinical trials.

Derivatives of known tumor-associated antigen

In addition to the above described approaches aimed at the identification of novel sarcoma antigens and related epitopes, it is also reasonable to target known tumor-associated antigens that had been previously identified in cancers other than sarcomas as long as these proteins are also expressed by these tumors (Fig. 1). Accordingly, the expression of several cancer-testis antigens [5154] and other antigenic proteins over-expressed by cancers compared to normal tissues [55, 56] has been investigated in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Despite reasonable expression levels, they have not been proved to be naturally antigenic in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma and lead to spontaneous CTL responses identifiable in the blood of these patients. Therefore, peptides derived from those known antigens are now being examined using reverse immunology to test their antigenicity and binding properties to the common HLA alleles, with the aim of utilizing them as targets for antigen-specific immunization.

Derivatives of SEREX-defined antigen

SEREX (serological analysis of recombinant cDNA expression library) was developed as a procedure to identify antigens without using autologous tumor-CTL pair [57]. SEREX defines putative antigens using serum IgG antibodies from cancer patients. Since isotype switching from IgM to IgG implies the presence of specific help from CD4+ T cells, antigens defined by SEREX are likely to contain epitopes for CD4+ T cells. SEREX analysis has been performed on patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas [16, 58, 59], displaying an array of cancer-testis antigens as possible candidates. However, antigenic peptides have yet to be isolated.

Clinical trials

To date, various immunotherapeutic trials have been conducted in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma (Table 3). They include vaccination of autologous tumors cells [5, 6, 60], autologous tumor lysates [5, 6], antigenic peptide [49, 61], and dendritic cells pulsed with tumor lysate [62] or peptides [63]. Also, adoptive transfer of allogeneic lymphocytes sensitized in vivo with the recipient's tumor lysate, was reported [7, 8]. None of them showed significant adverse events resulting from vaccinations.
Table 3

Immunotherapeutic trials in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma


Clinical setting

Immune intervention

Immunological response

Clinical outcome



Post-definitive surgery

Autologous tumor cells


NED at 2y, 1 of 13



Post-definitive surgery

Autologous tumor lysate


NED at 2y, 7 of 16



Post-definitive surgery

Allogeneic tumor-sensitized lymphocytes


NED at 2y, 12 of 32


Synovial sarcoma

Advanced stage

SYT-SSX peptides-pulsed DC

Cyototoxicity, 1 of 1

PD, 1 of 1



Advanced stage

SYT-SSX peptide

Cytotoxicity, 4 of 5

NC, 1 of 6


Ewing sarcoma

Advanced stage

EWS-FLI1 peptide + IL-2

T cell proliferation, 1 of 3

PR, 1 of 12


Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

Advanced stage

PAX3-FKHR peptide + IL-2


Response, none of 4


Various sarcomas

Advanced stage

Autologous tumor lysate-pulsed DC

DTH, 3 of 10

PR, 1 of 10



Advanced stage

Autologous tumor cell line

DTH, 8 of 16

Response, none of 12


DC, dendritic cells; IL-2, interleukin-2; N.D, not determined; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitiveity; NED, no evidence of disease; PD, progressive disease; NC, no change; PR, partial response

Immunological monitoring was not performed precisely in these initial trials due to the lack of target specificity in some trials and the limited expertise in immunological monitoring at that time in which the trails were designed. In contrast, recent trials using fusion gene-derived peptides [49, 61, 63] associated with specific HLA alleles revealed successful induction of tumor-specific CTLs from five out of ten patients examined, emphasizing the immunological feasibility of this approach. Notably, CTLs specific for a fusion gene-derived peptide could also be identified in only one out of five patients before vaccination in one of our trials [61]. Using HLA/peptide tetrameric complexes, we also noted in this trial, that the frequency of circulating CTL precursors specific to the SYT-SSX peptide increased in three patients while, for unclear reasons, decreased in one patient after vaccination [61].

Therapeutic efficacy cannot be assessed in such exploratory studies including a limited number of patients. However, it is interesting to report that during the conduct of recent clinical trials [49, 6063] tumor remission was observed in two out of a total of 45 patients who had received vaccination; one with Ewing's sarcoma [49] and the other with fibrosarcoma [62]. In these trials, all patients had advanced disease in contrast to the initial trials that had been conducted, in adjuvant setting, in patients with osteosarcoma [58]. In the latter trials, the patients underwent definitive amputative surgery for the primary tumor and had no detectable metastasis before immunotherapy. The clinical efficacy of immunological interventions was, therefore, evaluated in its ability to prevent recurrence of disease which most commonly occurs in the lungs as distant pulmonary metastases. In these clinical trials chemotherapy was not given in combination with immunotherapy since at that time there was no evidence that chemotherapy is associated with clinical benefit in adjuvant settings. Interestingly, osteosarcoma has biological features which suite the design of adjuvant immunotherapy trials. These include the frequent existence of micrometastases on initial presentation and a tendency to relapse during the first year of treatment, especially after excision of the primary tumor [64, 65]. The disease-free survival at two years was 33% in 32 patients who had undergone adoptive immunotherapy [8], and 44% in 16 patients vaccinated with autologous tumor lysate [6]. In a historical control including 145 patients treated by surgery alone, the two-year disease free survival was as low as 22% [8], suggesting that these immunotherapeutic trials hold some promise. Due to their small size and the lack of an appropriate contemporary and matched control population the significance of these results, however, needs to be further assessed. Nevertheless, the observations from these initial trials suggest that in patients with osteosarcoma and other bone and soft tissue sarcomas vaccination in adjuvant settings would be more likely to yield clinical benefit than vaccination with therapeutic purposes.


Given the rarity, relative low immunogenicity, and their heterogeneity, bone and soft tissue sarcomas have remained for a long time at the boundaries of tumor immunology. Up to three decades ago, they were perceived similarly by oncologists who inclined to approach cancer with chemotherapy [66]. As chemotherapy has relied upon intensification and multiplication of therapeutic schemes and the production of new chemotherapeutics to successfully enhance its efficacy, tumor immunologists will face the challenge of rationally expanding the use of antigens-specific immunization to enhance its usefulness against bone and soft tissue sarcomas.



cytotoxic T lymphocyte


human leukocyte antigen



We thank the professors emeritus Seiichi Ishii and Kokichi Kikuchi, and professor Toshimitsu Uede, for their continuous support and encouragement. We express our appreciation to the patients who participated in our studies, doctors in affiliated hospitals and our own colleagues for their important contributions. We also thank our hospital doctors and nurses for their clinical care to patients. This article is dedicated to Dr. Masahiko Ohta who deceased from gastric cancer in 1996 at the age of 33. Dr. Ohta was the first to join professor Sato's laboratory and initiated efforts to identify antigens specific for bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan


  1. Fletcher CDM, Rydholm A, Singer S, Sundaram M, Coindre JM: Soft tissue tumorus: Epidemiology, clinical features, histopathological typing and grading. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Edited by: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. 2002, Lyon: IARC Press, 12-18.Google Scholar
  2. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B, Kotz R, Vanel D, Park YK, Unni KK: WHO classification of tumours of bone: Introduction. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Edited by: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. 2002, Lyon: IARC Press, 227-232.Google Scholar
  3. Arndt CA, Crist WM: Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 342-352. 10.1056/NEJM199907293410507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell CJ, Cohen J, Enneking WF: New therapies for osteogenic sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975, 57: 143-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marcove RC, Mike V, Huvos AG, Southam CM, Levin AG: Vaccine trials for osteogenic sarcoma. A preliminary report. CA Cancer J Clin. 1973, 23: 74-80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcove RC: A clinical trial of autogenous vaccines in the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. Beitr Pathol. 1974, 153: 65-72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Marsh B, Flynn L, Enneking WF: Immunologic aspects of osteosarcoma and their appication to therapy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972, 54: 1367-1397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Neff JR, Enneking WF: Adoptive immunotherapy in primary osteosarcoma. An interim report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975, 57: 145-148.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaffe N, Frei E, Traggis D, Bishop Y: Adjuvant methotrexate and citrovorum-factor treatment of osteogenic sarcoma. N Engl J Med. 1974, 291: 994-997.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosen G, Suwansirikul S, Kwon C, Tan C, Wu SJ, Beattie EJ, Murphy ML: High-dose methotrexate with citrovorum factor rescue and adriamycin in childhood osteogenic sarcoma. Cancer. 1974, 33: 1151-1163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. van der Bruggen P, Traversari C, Chomez P, Lurquin C, De Plaen E, Van den Eynde B, Knuth A, Boon T: A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma. Science. 1991, 254: 1643-1647.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nabeta Y, Kawaguchi S, Sato Y, Wada T, Yamashita T, Sato N: Identification strategy and cataloguing of antigenic cancer epitopes. Mod Asp Immunobiol. 2000, 1: 17-19.Google Scholar
  13. Linehan DC, Bowne WB, Lewis JJ: Immunotherapeutic approaches to sarcoma. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999, 17: 72-77. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199907/08)17:1<72::AID-SSU9>3.0.CO;2-A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mackall CL, Berzofsky JA, Helman LJ: Targeting tumor specific translocation in sarcomas in pediatric patients for immunotherapy. Clin Orthop. 2000, 373: 25-31. 10.1097/00003086-200004000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Maki RG: Soft tissue sarcoma as a model disease to examine cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2001, 13: 270-274. 10.1097/00001622-200107000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nabeta Y, Kawaguchi S, Sahara H, Ikeda H, Hirohashi Y, Goroku T, Sato Y, Tsukahara T, Torigoe T, Wada T, Kaya M, Hiraga H, Isu K, Yamawaki S, Ishii S, Yamashita T, Sato N: Recognition by cellular and humoral autologous immunity in a human osteosarcoma cell line. J Orthop Sci. 2003, 8: 554-559. 10.1007/s00776-003-0663-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsukahara T, Nabeta Y, Kawaguchi S, Ikeda H, Sato Y, Shimozawa K, Ida K, Asanuma H, Hirohashi Y, Torigoe T, Hiraga H, Nagoya S, Wada T, Yamashita T, Sato N: Identification of human autologous cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-defined osteosarcoma gene that encodes a transcriptional regulator, papillomavirus binding factor. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 5442-5448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Coffin CM, Fletcher CDM: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Edited by: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. 2002, Lyon: IARC Press, 91-93.Google Scholar
  19. Coindre JM: Inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma / Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma with prominent inflammation. Pathology and genetics of tumours of soft tissue and bone. Edited by: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F. 2002, Lyon: IARC Press, 125-126.Google Scholar
  20. Melhem MF, Meisler AI, Saito R, Finley GG, Hockman HR, Koski RA: Cytokines in inflammatory malignant fibrous histiocytoma presenting with leukemoid reaction. Blood. 1993, 82: 2038-2044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Schiltz PM, Beutel LD, Nayak SK, Dillman RO: Characterization of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes derived from human tumors for use as adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. J Immunol. 1997, 20: 377-386.Google Scholar
  22. Zietz C, Rumpler U, Sturzl M, Lohrs U: Inverse relation of Fas-ligand and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in angiosarcoma: indications of apoptotic tumor counterattack. Am J pathol. 2001, 159: 963-970.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Orui H, Ishikawa A, Okada K, Nishida J, Mitsui H, Kashiwa H, Tsuchiya T, Ogino T, Yamakawa M: Dendritic cell and effector cell infiltration in soft tissue sarcomas with reactive lymphoid hyperplasia. J Orthop Sci. 2003, 8: 669-677. 10.1007/s00776-003-0692-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogihara Y, Takeda K, Yanagawa T, Hirasawa Y: Spontaneous regression of lung metastases from osteosarcoma. Cancer. 1994, 74: 2798-2803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabate JM, Llauger J, Torrubia S, Amores S, Franquet T: Osteosarcoma of the abdominal wall with spontaneous regression of lung metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998, 171: 691-692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ichino Y, Ishikawa T: Cytolysis of autologous fresh osteosarcoma cells by human cytotoxic T lymphocytes propagated with T cell growth factor. Gann. 1983, 74: 584-594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Slovin SF, Lackman RD, Ferrone S, Kiely PE, Mastrangelo MJ: Cellular immune response to human sarcomas: cytotoxic T cell clones reactive with autologous sarcomas. I. Development, phenotype, and specificity. J Immunol. 1986, 137: 3042-3048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsukahara T, Kawaguchi S, Ida K, Kimura S, Tamura Y, Ikeda T, Torigoe T, Nagoya S, Wada T, Sato N, Yamashita T: HLA-restricted specific tumor cytolysis by autologous T cell cells infiltrating metastatic bone malignant fibrous histiocytoma of lymph node. J Orthop Res.Google Scholar
  29. Zhang H, Merchant MS, Chua KS, Khanna C, Helman LJ, Telford B, Ward Y, Summers J, Toretsky J, Thomas EK, June CH, Mackall CL: Tumor expression of 4-1BB ligand sustains tumor lytic T cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2003, 2: 579-586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hayakawa M, Kawaguchi S, Ishii S, Murakami M, Uede T: B7-1-transfected tumor vaccine counteracts chemotherapy-induced immunosuppression and prolongs the survival of rats bearing highly metastatic osteosarcoma cells. Int J Cancer. 1997, 71: 1091-1102. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970611)71:6<1091::AID-IJC28>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagamori M, Kawaguchi S, Murakami M, Wada T, Inobe M, Ishii S, Uede T: In vivo immunogenicity of osteosarcoma cells that express B7-1a, an alternatively spliced form of B7-1. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22: 2009-2013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nagamori M, Kawaguchi S, Murakami M, Wada T, Nagoya S, Yamashita T, Inobe M, Uede T: Intrinsic and extrinsic manipulation of B7/CTLA-4 interaction for induction of anti-tumor immunity against osteosarcoma cells. Anticancer Res. 2002, 22: 3223-3227.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsuji H, Kawaguchi S, Wada T, Nagoya S, Inobe M, Yamashita T, Ishii S, Uede T: Adenovirus-mediated in vivo B7-1 gene transfer induces anti-tumor immunity against pre-established primary tumor and pulmonary metastasis of rat osteosarcoma. Cancer Gene Ther. 2002, 9: 747-755. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsuji H, Kawaguchi S, Wada T, Nagoya S, Inobe M, Yagita H, Okumura K, Yamashita T, Uede T: Concurrent induction of T-cell activation and apoptosis of osteosarcoma cells by adenovirus-mediated B7-1/Fas chimeric gene transfer. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003, 10: 717-725. 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Phan GQ, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, Restifo NP, Haworth LR, Seipp CA, Freezer LJ, Morton KE, Mavroukakis SA, Duray PH, Steinberg SM, Allison JP, Davis TA, Rosenberg SA: Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 8372-8377. 10.1073/pnas.1533209100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanderson K, Scotland R, Lee P, Liu D, Groshen S, Snively J, Sian S, Nichol G, Davis T, Keler T, Yellin M, Weber J: Autoimmunity in a phase I trial of a fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody with multiple melanoma peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for patients with resected stages III and IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 741-750. 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Altman JD, Moss PA, Goulder PJ, Barouch DH, McHeyzer-Williams MG, Bell JI, McMichael AJ, Davis MM: Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science. 1996, 274: 94-96. 10.1126/science.274.5284.94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sato Y, Nabeta Y, Tsukahara T, Hirohashi Y, Syunsui R, Maeda A, Sahara H, Ikeda H, Torigoe T, Ichimiya S, Wada T, Yamashita T, Hiraga H, Kawai A, Ishii T, Araki N, Myoui A, Matsumoto S, Umeda T, Ishii S, Kawaguchi S, Sato N: Detection and induction of CTLs specific for SYT-SSX-derived peptides in HLA-A24(+) patients with synovial sarcoma. J Immunol. 2002, 169: 1611-1618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sato Y, Sahara H, Tsukahara T, Kondo M, Hirohashi Y, Nabeta Y, Kawaguchi S, Ikeda H, Torigoe T, Ichimiya S, Tamura Y, Wada T, Yamashita T, Goto M, Takasu H, Sato N: Improved generation of HLA class I/peptide tetramers. J Immunol Methods. 2002, 271: 177-184. 10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00329-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ida K, Kawaguchi S, Sato Y, Tsukahara T, Nabeta Y, Sahara H, Ikeda H, Torigoe T, Ichimiya S, Kamiguchi K, Wada T, Nagoya S, Hiraga H, Kawai A, Ishii T, Araki N, Myoui A, Matsumoto S, Ozaki T, Yoshikawa H, Yamashita T, Sato N: Crisscross CTL induction by SYT-SSX junction peptide and its HLA-A*2402 anchor substitute. J Immunol. 2004, 173: 1436-1443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bennicelli JL, Barr FG: Chromosomal translocations and sarcomas. Curr Opin Oncol. 2002, 14: 412-419. 10.1097/00001622-200207000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Caligiuri MA, Verardi A, Scheinberg DA, Borrelo IM: Immunotherapeutic approaches for hematologic malignancies. Hematology. 2004, 337-353. 10.1182/asheducation-2004.1.337.Google Scholar
  43. Novellino L, Castelli C, Parmiani G: A listing of human tumor antigens recognized by T cells: March 2004 update. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54: 187-207. 10.1007/s00262-004-0560-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kubo RT, Sette A, Grey HM, Appella E, Sakaguchi K, Zhu NZ, Arnott D, Sherman N, Shabanowitz J, Michel H: Definition of specific peptide motifs for four major HLA-A alleles. J Immunol. 1994, 152: 3913-3924.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kondo A, Sidney J, Southwood S, del Guercio MF, Appella E, Sakamoto H, Celis E, Grey HM, Chesnut RW, Kubo RT: Prominent roles of secondary anchor residues in peptide binding to HLA-A24 human class I molecules. J Immunol. 1995, 155: 4307-4312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nencioni A, Grunebach F, Patrone F, Brossart P: Anticancer vaccination strategies. Ann Oncol. 2004, 15: iv153-iv160. 10.1093/annonc/mdh920.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh-Jasuja H, Emmerich NP, Rammensee HG: The Tubingen approach: identification, selection, and validation of tumor-associated HLA peptides for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53: 187-195. 10.1007/s00262-003-0480-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Worley BS, van den Broeke LT, Goletz TJ, Pendelton D, Daschbach EM, Thomas EK, Marincola FM, Helman LJ, Berzofsky JA: Antigenecity of fusion proteins from sarcoma-associated chromosomal translocations. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 6868-6875.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Dagher R, Long LM, Read EJ, Leitman SF, Carter CS, Tsokos M, Goletz TJ, Avila N, Berzofsky JA, Helman LJ, Mackall CL: Pilot trial of tumor-specific peptide vaccination and continuous infusion interleukin-2 in patients with recurrent Ewing sarcoma and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: an inter-institute NIH study. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002, 38: 158-164. 10.1002/mpo.1303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Boeckle S, Pfister H, Steger G: A new cellular factor recognizes E2 binding sites of papillomaviruses which mediate transcriptional repression by E2. Virology. 2002, 293: 103-117. 10.1006/viro.2001.1231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Sudo T, Kuramoto T, Komiya S, Inoue A, Itoh K: Expression of MAGE genes in osteosarcoma. J Orthop Res. 1997, 15: 128-132. 10.1002/jor.1100150119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Naka N, Araki N, Nakanishi H, Itoh K, Mano M, Ishiguro S, de Bruijn DR, Myoui A, Ueda T, Yoshikawa H: Expression of SSX genes in human osteosarcomas. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 640-642. 10.1002/ijc.10277.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ayyoub M, Taub RN, Keohan ML, Hesdorffer M, Metthez G, Memeo L, Mansukhani M, Hibshoosh H, Hesdorffer CS, Valmori D: The frequent expression of cancer/testis antigens provides opportunities for immunotherapeutic targeting of sarcoma. Cancer Immun. 2004, 4: 7-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Segal NH, Blachere NE, Guevara-Patino JA, Gallardo HF, Shiu HYA, Viale A, Antonescu CR, Wolchok JD, Houghton AN: Identification of cancer-testis genes expressed by melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma using bioinformatics. Cancer Immun. 2005, 5: 2-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ishida H, Matsumura T, Salgaller ML, Ohmizono Y, Kadono Y, Sawada T: MAGE-1 and MAGE-3 or -6 expression in neuroblastoma-related pediatric solid tumors. Int J Cancer. 1996, 69: 375-380. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19961021)69:5<375::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ueda T, Oji Y, Naka N, Nakano Y, Takahashi E, Koga S, Asada M, Ikeba A, Nakatsuka S, Abeno S, Hosen N, Tomita Y, Aozasa K, Tamai N, Myoui A, Yoshikawa H, Sugiyama H: Overexpression of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1 in human bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Cancer Sci. 2003, 94: 271-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sahin U, Tureci O, Schmitt H, Cochlovius B, Johannes T, Schmits R, Stenner F, Luo G, Schobert I, Pfreundschuh M: Human neoplasms elicit multiple specific immune responses in the autologous host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 11810-11813.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee SY, Obata Y, Yoshida M, Stockert E, Williamson B, Jungbluth AA, Chen YT, Old LJ, Scanlan MJ: Immunomic analysis of human sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100: 2651-2656. 10.1073/pnas.0437972100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sega NH, Blachere NE, Shiu HYA, Leejee S, Antonescu CR, Lewis JJ, Wolchok JD, Houghton AN: Antigens recognized by autologous antibodies of patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer Immun. 2005, 5: 4-Google Scholar
  60. Dillman R, Barth N, Selvan S, Beutel L, de Leon C, DePriest C, Peterson C, Nayak S: Phase I/II trial of autologous tumor cell line-derived vaccines for recurrent or metastatic sarcomas. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2004, 19: 581-588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Kawaguchi S, Wada T, Ida K, Sato Y, Nagoya S, Tsukahara T, Kimura S, Sahara H, Ikeda H, Shimozawa K, Asanuma H, Torigoe T, Hiraga H, Ishii T, Tatezaki SI, Sato N, Yamashita T: Phase I vaccination trial of SYT-SSX junction peptide in patients with disseminated synovial sarcoma. J Transl Med. 2005, 3: 1-10.1186/1479-5876-3-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Geiger J, Hutchinson R, Hohenkirk L, McKenna E, Chang A, Mule J: Treatment of solid tumours in children with tumour-lysate-pulsed dendritic cells. Lancet. 2000, 356: 1163-1165. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02762-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Matsuzaki A, Suminoe A, Hattori H, Hoshina T, Hara T: Immunotherapy with autologous dendritic cells and tumor-specific synthetic peptides for synovial sarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002, 24: 220-223. 10.1097/00043426-200203000-00012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Friedman MA, Carter SK: The therapy of osteogenic sarcoma: current status and thoughts for the future. J Surg Oncol. 1972, 4: 482-510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Kaya M, Wada T, Nagoya S, Kawaguchi S, Isu K, Yamashita T: Concomitant tumour resistance in patients with osteosarcoma. A clue to a new therapeutic strategy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004, 86: 143-147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Burchnal JH: A giant step forward – If... N Engl J Med. 1974, 291: 1029-1031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Kawaguchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.