Open Access

Epitope definition by proteomic similarity analysis: identification of the linear determinant of the anti-Dsg3 MAb 5H10

  • Alberta Lucchese1,
  • Abraham Mittelman2,
  • Mong-Shang Lin3,
  • Darja Kanduc4Email author and
  • Animesh A Sinha5
Journal of Translational Medicine20042:43

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-2-43

Received: 15 October 2004

Accepted: 11 December 2004

Published: 11 December 2004

Abstract

Background

Walking along disease-associated protein sequences in the search for specific segments able to induce cellular immune response may direct clinical research towards effective peptide-based vaccines. To this aim, we are studying the targets of the immune response in autoimmune diseases by applying the principle of non-self-discrimination as a driving concept in the identification of the autoimmunogenic peptide sequences.

Methods

Computer-assisted proteomic analysis of the autoantigen protein sequence and dot-blot/NMR immunoassays are applied to the prediction and subsequent validation of the epitopic sequences.

Results

Using the experimental model Pemphigus vulgaris/desmoglein 3, we have identified the antigenic linear determinant recognized by MAb 5H10, a monoclonal antibody raised against the extracellular domain of human desmoglein-3. The computer-assisted search for the Dsg3 epitope was conducted by analyzing the similarity level to the mouse proteome of the human desmoglein protein sequence. Dot-blot immunoassay analyses mapped the epitope within the sequence Dsg349–60 REWVKFAKPCRE, which shows low similarity to the mouse proteome. NMR spectroscopy analyses confirmed the specificity of MAb 5H10 for the predicted epitope.

Conclusions

This report promotes the concept that low level of sequence similarity to the host's proteome may modulate peptide epitopicity.

Keywords

Epitope mapping Computational biology Proteomics Desmoglein 3 Pemphigus vulgaris

Introduction

In the last decades, several computer-driven algorithms have been devised to take advantage of the linear representation of protein sequence information to search for epitopic motifs [15]. These algorithms search the amino acid sequence of a given protein for characteristics believed to be common to antigenic peptides, locating regions that are likely to induce cellular immune response. Given the rapid expansion of proteomic sequence data, the application of these algorithms to disease-associated proteins may direct research to specific segments of disease-associated proteins and thus potentially reduce the time and effort needed to develop effective vaccines [6, 7].

We are using in silico technology platforms to identify epitopic peptide sequence(s) from disease-associated-antigens by following the hypothesis that peptide epitopicity might be regulated by the peptide similarity level to the host's proteome, in addition to other factors such as MHC binding potential [810]. As a scientific rationale, we follow the criterion that immune system might be allowed/forced to respond only to rarely encountered/never seen antigenic sequences. Accordingly, we explain the non-immunogenicity of tumor-associated-antigens as due to high level of similarity of oncoprotein sequences to self-proteome [8, 9, 12].

In this context we have tested here the possibility that endogenous, normal, housekeeping self-proteins harbouring sequences with little or no similarity to the collective host proteome might be epitopic targets in autoimmune responses. Self-reactivity and autoimmunity are processes related to the breakage of self-tolerance that can be distinguished by their different clinical outcome. The transition from self-reactivity to the autoimmune pathology appears to be mediated by a complex network of overlapping phenomena that comprehend epitope spreading, uncovering of cryptic epitopes, natural autoantibodies production, cross-reactivity, microchimerism, altered B lymphocyte function, inflammation, etc. [13]. In our labs, we are studying the autoantibody profile in Pemphigus vulgaris (PV). PV is an autoimmune bullous skin disease characterized by autoantibodies to a desmosomal adhesion molecule, the cadherin desmoglein-3 (Dsg3) [14]. Dsg3 represents an optimal autoantigen for studying the relationship between similarity level and immune responses. Indeed the PVA Dsg3 is a highly conserved protein, and the human and mouse forms present 71.6% of identity. Therefore, this protein allows to analyze the sequence specificity of the reaction PVA-autoantibody by using murine monoclonal antibodies. Moreover, our interest to study the autoantibody response in this autoimmune disease also stems from the following considerations: i) so far, notwithstanding the Dsg3 linear structure, attention has been focused mainly on conformational Dsg3 epitopes [1518] and there is a lack of data on the occurrence and fine molecular characterization of linear Dsg3 epitopes; ii) although the precise pathological implications of anti-Dsg autoantibodies are not fully elucidated [1923], it seems likely that a spectrum of autoantibodies, differing in number and type, might contribute to the autoimmune pathology in PV [24]. Given these premises, the development of new experimental approaches that might lead to the exact definition of linear PVA epitopes is desirable. As a first attempt to a computer-driven individuation of defined linear epitopic sequences of Dsg3, we describe here the identification of the linear epitope of the MAb 5H10 raised in BALB/c mice against the extracellular domain (EC1/EC2, aa1-212) of human Dsg3.

Materials and methods

Computer-assisted analyses

The amino acid sequence corresponding to accession number P32926, SWISS-PROT, was used in the similarity analysis of the extracellular domain of human Dsg3 (EC1 to part of EC2, amino acid 1–212) to the mouse proteome. The Dsg3 sequence under analysis was dissected into pentamer motifs, that were probed for sequence similarity to mouse proteome by using PIR non-redundant reference protein database and peptide match program http://pir.georgetown.edu/pirwww[25]. The search was conducted against mouse complete genome for a total of 78435 sequences, and includes hypothetical/unidentified proteins sequences.

Antibodies

Anti-Dsg3 MAb 5H10 and 5G11, raised in BALB/c mice, were a generous gift of Dr. Margaret Wheelock, University of Toledo, Ohio. Both MAbs recognize a linear determinant and have been described in detail [26]. Briefly, MAb 5H10 has been shown to recognize the amino terminal part of the extracellular domain of Dsg3 (EC1 to part of EC2, amino acid 1–212). MAb 5G11 reacts with the carboxyl terminus of the EC domain of Dsg3 (part of EC4 to EC5, amino acid 446–613). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG-specific Abs was from Sigma, Chemical Co., St.Louis, Mo.

Synthetic peptides

Peptides were synthesized using standard Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl) solid phase peptide synthesis. Peptide purity (>90%) was controlled by analytical HPLC, and the molecular mass of purified peptides confirmed by fast atomic bombardment mass spectrometry. The EC1/EC2 Dsg336–45EEMTMQQAKR, Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE, and Dsg3173–187 NSLVMILNATDADEP peptides were obtained from PeptidoGenic Research & Co., Livermore, CA., and used in dot-blot immunoassay experiments. Human recombinant Dsg3 protein was used as further control [27]. The 15N-labelled synthetic peptide Dsg349–60R EWV KFA KPCR E (where 15N-labelled amino acid residues are underlined) was from Primm srl, Milan, Italy. Peptides were dissolved in 0.9% NaCl, aliquoted and stored at -20°C.

Dot immunoassay

Nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 μm pore size, BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) was pretreated for 10 min with 1.0% glutaraldehyde. Synthetic peptides were spotted on the activated membranes, left to dry at RT and exposed to UV rays for 10 min. Membranes were incubated for 1 h in phosphate-buffered saline/0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 (PBST) containing 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA), and then with the primary MAb (1:800) for further 2 h. Membranes were washed for 10 min with PBST (x3) and incubated in PBST/4% BSA with HRP-conjugated affinity-purified goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1000) for 1 h. Membranes were washed in PBST for 5 min (x3), in PBS for 5 min (x3) and immunoblots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection assay (Renaissance, NEN™ Life Science Products, Boston, MA.) following supplier's instructions.

NMR spectroscopy

NMR spectra of the reaction between the synthetic 15N-labelled peptide Dsg349–60R EWV KFA KPCR E (where 15N-labelled amino acid residues are underlined) and MAb 5H10 (raised against EC1/EC2 from Dsg3) or 5G11 (raised against EC4/EC5 from Dsg3) were recorded at 298°K on a Bruker Avance DRX500WB spectrometer. The spectra were acquired by heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments that correlate the chemical shift of proton with the chemical shift of the directly bonded nitrogen. Specifically, the two-dimensional 1H-15N inverse detected correlation spectra were acquired by the gradient pulse sensitivity improved Bruker automation program INVIETGPSI [28]. The 1H acquisition dimension was collected with a spectral width of 5 ppm, centered at 7.6 ppm, using 4096 datapoints for each of the total 32 scans/expt. Spectral width in the indirect detected 15N dimension was 200 ppm, centered at 90 ppm, obtained with a total of 1024 points. The spectra were processed by XwinNMR program, version 2.6, running on an INDY R5000 Silicon Graphics Workstation. Chemical shift values were referenced to sodium tetrasilyl propionate (TSP) (1H; 0.000 ppm) and external neat nitromethane (15N; 380.23 ppm) standards. To avoid interferences of TSP standard with peptide samples, the instrument scale was preliminarily calibrated in parallel experiments with samples containing the peptide to be analysed plus 0.2 mg TSP. We used chemical shift statistics from the full BioMagResBank database, where the calculated statistics are derived from a total of 559392 chemical shifts (website: http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/ref_info/statful.htm). Sequence-specific correction factor tabulations were applied to backbone 1H and 15N resonances [29]. Two-dimensional correlated spectroscopy spectra of MAb-peptide complex were obtained using a 1:2 stoicheiometric molar ratio (peptide:MAb, 0.1:20, mg/mg). That is, NMR samples contained either 0.1 mg free R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide, or 20 mg MAb 5H10 complexed with 0.1 mg R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide, or 20 mg MAb 5G11 complexed with 0.1 mg R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide, in 0.5 ml aqueous solution H2O/D2O (9:1, v/v).

Results

Selection of Dsg3 peptide sequences with low similarity to the mouse proteome

The EC1/EC2 domain (aa1-212) of human Dsg3 was dissected into 5-mer sequences and analyzed for similarity to mouse proteins. The pentamers used for epitope scanning were offset by one residue, i.e. overlapped by 4 residues: MMGLF, MGLFP, GLFPR, LFPRT, etc. The 5-mer sequences were probed in computer-assisted similarity analyses against the complete mouse genome sequences. Fig. 1 reports the profile we obtained by representing the number of matches to mouse proteome over the sequential pentamer peptides. It can be seen that the EC1/EC2 Dsg3 protein sequence presents stretches scarcely represented in the mouse proteome. Among the low-similarity EC1/EC2 Dsg3 peptide fragments, the Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE sequence was the longest (12 amino acid residues long) with the lowest number of matches to the murine proteome (number of matches to murine proteome = 9). The Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE sequence and a second low-similarity fragment, Dsg336–45EEMTMQQAKR (number of matches to murine proteome = 12), were selected to test our hypothesis.
Figure 1

Molecular mimicry between the EC1/EC2 of human Dsg3 and mouse proteome. The EC1/EC2 Dsg3 sequence (aa1-212) was scanned for matches to mouse protein sequences by using pentamers offset by one residue. The arrow indicates the longest stretch having the lowest number of matches.

Dot-blot immunoassay

The two low similarity peptides selected as described above were synthetised in order to be assayed in immunodot-blot analyses to identify the linear determinant of the MAb 5H10. In addition, the synthetic Dsg3173–187NSLVMILNATDADEP peptide (matches to murine proteome = 109) was available and served as a high similarity peptide control. The three synthetic peptides are described in Fig. 2. The MAb 5G11 with specificity to the terminal EC portion of Dsg3, amino acid 446–613 [26] was used as a primary antibody control. The immunodot-blot experimental result is illustrated in Fig. 3. It can be seen that MAb 5H10 recognized peptide n. 2, i.e. the Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE sequence having a lowest level of similarity to the mouse proteome (see Fig. 1). No reaction was monitored using MAb 5G11.
Figure 2

Similarity scanning on the human Dsg3 peptide sequences selected for immunoassay analysis with murine anti-EC1/EC2 Mab 5H10. Matching analysis to the murine proteome was performed using as probes pentamers offset by one residue as described under Methods. Peptide: 1) Dsg336–45EEMTMQQAKR; 2) Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE; 3) Dsg3173–187NSLVMILNATDADEP.

Figure 3

Identification of the epitopic sequence recognized by mouse anti-Dsg3 1–212 MAb 5H10. Dot-blot immunoassay was performed on nitrocellulose membrane spotted with human Dsg3 (10μg), or Dsg3 peptide (2.5μg) corresponding to the sequence: 1) Dsg336–45EEMTMQQAKR; 2) Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE; 3) Dsg3173–187NSLVMILNATDADEP.

NMR spectroscopic immunoanalysis

As a further step, we carried out a parallel experimental confirmation because of the doubts of false negative/positive data intrinsic to immunoassay. To this aim, the binding of the predicted epitopic Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE peptide and the mouse anti-Dsg3 5H10 MAb was further verified by NMR spectroscopy. NMR spectroscopy can be used in 1) defining structure and conformation; 2) defining structure-activity relationships; 3) monitoring chemical reactions. Informations are mainly derived by measuring NMR chemical shifts. The chemical shift of a nucleus is the difference between the resonance frequency of the nucleus and a standard. This quantity is reported in parts per million (ppm). The NMR standards are molecules as tetrasilyl propionate, the signal of which is set at 0 ppm by having shielded protons. The NMR chemical shift allows for distinguishing magnetically inequivalent nuclei in a molecule, i.e. chemical shifts are a measure of the motional freedom.

We utilized NMR spectroscopy in order to determine whether the predicted peptide specifically binds to the MAb 5H10. To this aim, a 15N-labelled R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide(where 15N-labelled amino acid residues are underlined) was synthesized. Theoretical chemical shift values of the 15N-labelled residues in the Dsg349–60 R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide were calculated as described under Methods, and then were compared to the experimental values. Table 1 lists the theoretical and experimental chemical shift values of 15N-labelled residues in the Dsg349–60 R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide, and their values following addition of MAb 5H10 or MAb 5G11.
Table 1

Sequence-specific assignments in the 15N-labelled Dsg349–60R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide, and chemical shift changes on MAb 5H10 or 5G11 binding.

15 N-Amino acid

Chemical Shift Values:

 

Theoretical:

Free peptide

Experimental:

Free peptide

+MAb 5H10

+control MAb 5G11

 

1HN

15N

1HN

15N

1HN

15N

1HN

15N

Arg-1

6.78

77.6

6.95

81.0

n.d.

n.d.

7.05

80.5

Val-4

8.65

120.8

8.19

122.8

n.d.

n.d.

8.18

122.5

Phe-6

8.42

121.7

7.99

119.2

n.d.

n.d.

8.00

118.9

Ala-7

8.29

122.3

8.40

120.0

n.d.

n.d.

8.44

120.2

Arg-11

6.78

77.6

7.25

81.5

n.d.

n.d.

7.26

81.0

 

8.14

119.6

8.16

118.1

n.d.

n.d.

8.15

117.8

The 15N-amino acid position in the peptide is reported. Theoretical chemical shift values were derived from http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/ref_info/statful.htm and corrected [29]. Experimental chemical shift values were derived from resonance spectra reported in Fig. 4. The average value of chemical shifts relative to the H and N atoms of α amino residue, and the H and N atoms of η amino residues are reported for Arg-11 (data from: http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/ref_info/statful.htm). The chemical shifts relative to the H and N atoms of α amino residue in Arg-1 are undetectable because of terminal position of the amino acid in the peptide. n.d., not detected.

The resonance spectra of the reaction between MAb 5H10 and the 15N-labelled Dsg349–60 R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide are illustrated in Fig. 4. Each "spot" in the figure is an NMR signal representing the 1H-15N one-bond coupling of the labelled amino acid residues in the peptide. In Fig. 4A, the reported spots correspond to the Arg, Val, Phe and Ala selective 1H-15N correlation signals of the free peptide in aqueous solution. As already illustrated in Table 1, the expected signals are present and in basic agreement with theoretical data (see BioMagResBank database, http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu) following sequence-dependent correction of random coil NMR chemical shifts. [29]. The upper panel of Fig. 4A displays the two Arg cross-peak signal, i. e. the chemical shifts relative to the H and N atoms of amino residues. The lower panel in fig. 4A reports the cross-signal of 15N-Arg-11 whereas the 15N-Arg-1 was undetectable because of the terminal position in the peptide. Fig. 4B documents that the addition of MAb 5H10 caused the loss of 15N-labelled residue spectral resonance signals thus indicating a complete loss of Dsg349–60R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide mobility. In contrast to the total signal deletion provoked by MAb 5H10, the chemical shift values of the Dsg349–60 R EWV KFA KPCR E peptide remained unaltered following the addition of the anti-Dsg3 MAb 5G11 (Fig. 4C, upper and lower panels).
Figure 4

1 H- 15 N NMR HSQC spectra and relative 1-D contour plots of the Dsg3 49–60 R EW V K FA KPC R E peptide 15 N-labelled at residues 7, 10, 12 and 14 (A), plus MAb 5H10 (B), or 511G (C). Upper panels report portions of the HSQC spectra showing resonances from residues 1, 4, 6, 7, and 11. Lower panels report expanded region of the HSQC spectra showing resonances from the same residues 4, 6, 7, and 11.

Discussion

The present data appear of interest since, as a preliminary consideration, it has to be noted that historically the search for biologically relevant epitopic sequences has demanded and still demands complicated procedures and expensive technologies [30]. Here, the low-similarity principle we used has allowed the utilization of proteomic computational program for the exact epitope definition of a MAb directed towards a 212 amino acid sequence by using only 3 synthetic peptide reagents. Minimally, the screening of a library of at least 14 non-overlapping peptides, each 15 residues in length, would be necessary in the unassisted case. Moreover, the individuation of the Dsg349–60REWVKFAKPCRE motif as the antigenic epitope of the Dsg3 EC1/EC2 domain, aa1-212, might contribute to the understanding of the autoimmune mechanisms in PV. This immunogenic sequence is hosted in the NH2 terminal region of Dsg3, which has adhesive function in cadherins [31] and contains the major epitopes recognized by sera from PV patients [32]. Further, chimeric toxins containing the Dsg3 EC1/EC2 domain, aa1-212, have been demonstrated to downregulate anti-Dsg3 IgG-producing B cells in mice immunized with Dsg3 aa1-212 [26].

In a wider context, the epitope mapping approach here described might be helpful in defining peptide antigenicity in a wide spectrum of human diseases including cancer pathologies as well as a range of diverse autoimmune disorders such as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Pemphigus vulgaris. The fine profiling of the disease-associated epitopic peptide repertoire is of particular importance in the definition of qualities as antigenicity and immunodominance, and is an essential preliminary step towards effective immunotherapeutical treatments in cancer and autoimmune pathologies. In synthesis, given the caveat that only linear sequences can be defined by the analysis of amino acid motif sharing by two or more proteins, the epitope prediction model we report could form the basis of a rapid, inexpensive and computationally driven system for the individuation of antigenic sequences that are the targets of autoimmune responses. Consequently, this proteomic strategy may serve as a general method suitable to define/distinguish/screen disease-(ir)relevant epitopes within potential autoantigens with clinical application to wide ranging human diseases where the precise targets of self-directed attack are unknown [33].

Abbreviations

Dsg3: 

desmoglein 3

EC: 

extracellular

PVA: 

Pemphigus vulgaris autoantigen

PIR: 

Protein Information Resource

HSQC: 

heteronuclear single quantum correlation.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. F. P. Fanizzi, NMR Unit, CARSO Cancer Research Center, Regione Puglia, Italy, for precious help and discussion. This work was supported by: European Community funding to the PhD course "Carcinogenesis, Aging and Immunoregulation"; Zalmin A. Arlin Cancer Fund, NY, USA; Public Health Service Grant RO1-AI48427 to M.S.L.; Research Grant from the Dermatology Foundation to A.A.S.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Odontostomatology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bari
(2)
Department of Medicine, New York Medical College
(3)
Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin
(4)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bari
(5)
Department of Dermatology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University

References

  1. Cornette JL, Margalit H, Berzofsky JA, DeLisi C: Periodic variation in side-chain polarities of T-cell antigenic peptides correlates with their structure and activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 8368-8372.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Meister GE, Roberts CGP, Berzofsky JA, De Groot AS: Two novel T cell epitope prediction algorithms based on MHC-binding motifs; comparison of predicted and published epitopes from Mycobacterium tuberculosis and HIV protein sequences. Vaccine. 1995, 13: 581-591. 10.1016/0264-410X(94)00014-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rammensee H, Bachmann J, Emmerich NP, Bachor OA, Stevanovic S: SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics. 1999, 50: 213-219. 10.1007/s002510050595.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McGarvey PB, Huang H, Barker WC, Orcutt BC, Garavelli JS, Srinivasarao GY, Yeh LS, Xiao C, Wu CH: PIR: a new resource for bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2000, 16: 290-291. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.3.290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuttler C, Nussbaum AK, Dick TP, Rammensee HG, Schild H, Hadeler KP: An algorithm for the prediction of proteasomal cleavages. J Mol Biol. 2000, 298: 417-429. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3683.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Berzofsky JA, Ahlers JD, Belyakov IM: Strategies for designing and optimizing new generation vaccines. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001, 1: 209-219. 10.1038/35105075.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Doolan DL, Southwood S, Freilich DA, Sidney J, Graber NL, Shatney L, Bebris L, Florens L, Dobano C, Witney AA, Appella E, Hoffman SL, Yates JR, Carucci DJ, Sette A: Identification of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by antigenic analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9952-9957. 10.1073/pnas.1633254100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Willers J, Lucchese A, Kanduc D, Ferrone S: Molecular mimicry of phage displayed peptides mimicking GD3 ganglioside. Peptides. 1999, 20: 1021-1026. 10.1016/S0196-9781(99)00095-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Natale C, Giannini T, Lucchese A, Kanduc D: Computer-assisted analysis of molecular mimicry between HPV16 E7 oncoprotein and human protein sequences. Immunol Cell Biol. 2000, 78: 580-585. 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00949.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mittelman A, Lucchese A, Sinha AA, Kanduc D: Monoclonal and polyclonal humoral immune response to EC HER-2/NEU peptides with low similarity to the host's proteome. Int J Cancer. 2002, 98: 741-747. 10.1002/ijc.10259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mittelman A, Tiwari R, Lucchese G, Willers J, Dummer R, Kanduc D: Identification of Monoclonal Anti-HMW-MAA Antibody Linear Peptide Epitope by Proteomic Database Mining. J Invest Dermat. 2004, 123: 670-675. 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23417.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dummer R, Mittelman A, Fanizzi FP, Lucchese G, Willers J, Kanduc D: Non-self-discrimination as a driving concept in the identification of an immunodominant HMW-MAA epitopic peptide sequence by autoantibodies from melanoma cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2004, 111: 720-726. 10.1002/ijc.20310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sercarz E, Maverakis E, van den Elzen P, Madakamutil L, Kumar V: Seven surprises in the TCR-centred regulation of immune responsiveness in an autoimmune system. Novartis Found Symp. 2003, 252: 165-171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Karpati S, Amagai M, Prussick R, Cehrs K, Stanley JR: Pemphigus vulgaris antigen, a desmoglein type of cadherin, is localized within keratinocyte desmosomes. J Cell Biol. 1993, 122: 409-415. 10.1083/jcb.122.2.409.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kowalczyk AP, Anderson JE, Borgwardt JE, Hashimoto T, Stanley JR, Green KJ: Pemphigus sera recognize conformationally sensitive epitopes in the amino-terminal region of desmoglein-1. J Invest Dermatol. 1995, 105: 147-152. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12316680.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Futei Y, Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Nishikawa T: Conformational epitope mapping and IgG subclass distribution of desmoglein 3 in paraneoplastic pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003, 49: 1023-1028. 10.1016/S0190-9622(03)02160-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tsunoda K, Ota T, Aoki M, Yamada T, Nagai T, Nakagawa T, Koyasu S, Nishikawa T, Amagai M: Induction of pemphigus phenotype by a mouse monoclonal antibody against the amino-terminal adhesive interface of desmoglein 3. J Immunol. 2003, 170: 2170-2178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Anzai H, Fujii Y, Nishifuji K, Aoki-Ota M, Ota T, Amagai M, Nishikawa T: Conformational epitope mapping of antibodies against desmoglein 3 inexperimental murine pemphigus vulgaris. J Dermatol Sci. 2004, 35: 133-142. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2004.03.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hertl M, Amagai M, Sundaram H, Stanley J, Ishii K, Katz SI: Recognition of desmoglein 3 by autoreactive T cells in pemphigus vulgaris patients and normals. J Invest Dermatol. 1998, 110: 62-66. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.1998.00086.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nguyen VT, Ndoye A, Shultz LD, Pittelkow MR, Grando SA: Antibodies against keratinocyte antigens other than desmoglein 1 and 3 can induce pemphigus vulgaris-like lesions. J Clin Invest. 2000, 106: 1467-1479.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Stanley JR, Nishikawa T, Diaz LA, Amagai M: Pemphigus: is there another half of the story?. J Invest Dermatol. 2001, 116: 489-490. 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01307.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Veldman C, Hohne A, Dieckmann D, Schuler G, Hertl M: Type I regulatory T cells specific for desmoglein 3 are more frequently detected in healthy individuals than in patients with pemphigus vulgaris. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 6468-6475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Veldman CM, Gebhard KL, Uter W, Wassmuth R, Grotzinger J, Schultz E, Hertl M: T cell recognition of desmoglein 3 peptides in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and healthy individuals. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 3883-3892.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hacker MK, Janson M, Fairley JA, Lin MS: Isotypes and antigenic profiles of pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris autoantibodies. Clin Immunol. 2002, 105: 64-74. 10.1006/clim.2002.5259.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu CH, Huang H, Arminski L, Castro-Alvear J, Chen Y, Hu ZZ, Ledley RS, Lewis KC, Mewes HW, Orcutt BC, Suzek BE, Tsugita A, Vinayaka CR, Yeh LSL, Zhang J, Barker WC: The Protein Information Resource: an integrated public resource of functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30: 35-37. 10.1093/nar/30.1.35.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Proby CM, Ota T, Suzuki H, Koyasu S, Gamou S, Shimizu N, Wahl JK, Wheelock MJ, Nishikawa T, Amagai M: Development of chimeric molecules for recognition and targeting of antigen-specific B cells in pemphigus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2000, 142: 321-330. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03328.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin MS, Swartz SJ, Lopez A, Ding X, Fairley JA, Diaz LA: T lymphocytes from a subset of patients with pemphigus vulgaris respond to both desmoglein-3 and desmoglein-1. J Invest Dermatol. 1997, 109: 734-737. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12340738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schleucher J, Schwendinger M, Sattler M, Schmidt P, Schedletzky O, Glaser SJ, Sorensen OW, Griesinger C: A general enhancement scheme in heteronuclear multidimensional NMR employing pulsed field gradients. J Biomol NMR. 1994, 4: 301-306. 10.1007/BF00175254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarzinger S, Kroon GJA, Foss TR, Chung J, Wright PE, Dyson HJ: Sequence-dependent correction of random coil NMR chemical shifts. J Am Chem Soc. 2001, 123: 2970-2978. 10.1021/ja003760i.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morris GE: Epitope Mapping Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1996, Humana Press: Totowa, NJGoogle Scholar
  31. Nose A, Tsuji K, Takeichi M: Localisation of specificity determining sites in cadherin cell adhesion molecules. Cell. 1990, 61: 147-155. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90222-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Amagai M, Karpati S, Prussick R, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR: Autoantibodies against the amino-terminal cadherin-like binding domain of pemphigus vulgaris antigen are pathogenic. J Clin Invest. 1992, 90: 919-926.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lim MS, Elenitoba-Johnson KSJ: Proteomics in pathology research. Lab Invest. 2004, 84: 1227-1244. 10.1038/labinvest.3700167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lucchese et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement