- Open Access
Rapid molecular genetic diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by semiconductor sequencing
Journal of Translational Medicine volume 12, Article number: 173 (2014)
Rapidly determining the complex genetic basis of Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is vital to better understanding and optimally managing this common polygenetic cardiovascular disease.
A rapid custom Ion-amplicon-resequencing assay, covering 30 commonly affected genes of HCM, was developed and validated in 120 unrelated patients with HCM to facilitate genetic diagnosis of this disease. With this HCM-specific panel and only 20 ng of input genomic DNA, physicians can, for the first time, go from blood samples to variants within a single day.
On average, this approach gained 595628 mapped reads per sample, 95.51% reads on target (64.06 kb), 490-fold base coverage depth and 93.24% uniformity of base coverage in CDS regions of the 30 HCM genes. After validation, we detected underlying pathogenic variants in 87% (104 of 120) samples. Tested seven randomly selected HCM genes in eight samples by Sanger sequencing, the sensitivity and false-positive-rate of this HCM panel was 100% and 5%, respectively.
This Ion amplicon HCM resequencing assay provides a currently most rapid, comprehensive, cost-effective and reliable measure for genetic diagnosis of HCM in routinely obtained samples.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is regarded as a most common inherited cardiac disorder (1/500) and the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in adolescents 0020[1–4]. So far, over 1000 mutations in at least 30 genes have been reported to responsible for HCM, which implied an highly genetic heterogeneity and hence resulting various clinical phenotypes, ranging from asymptomatic forms to sudden cardiac death in the young[3, 5–12]. Although disease-causing mutations in MYH7, MYBPC3 and TNNT2 had been considered to explain about half of HCM patients[8, 9], the frequency of each causal variant is relatively low and most rare mutations are unique in specific families. Moreover, about 10% HCM patients harbored more than one mutation and thus suffering from an earlier onset or worse prognosis[2, 7]. Therefore, systemic genetic diagnosis for HCM patients was necessary and recommended by current clinical guidelines[14–17]. For instance, the identification of sudden-death-high-risk patients could benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in primary prevention.
However, conventional Sanger sequencing was too laborious and expensive to content regular clinical practice. Advancing high throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have the potential to solve the problem by rapidly dissecting large regions at low cost[1, 20–22]. Nevertheless, the current NGS platforms have several weaknesses, including sample scalability, sequencing time and cost of entry, which need to be addressed if these technologies are going to service clinical routine genetic diagnosis. With lowest-price, shortest running time, minimum start DNA amount and flexible sequencing-chip reagents, the recent flourishing semiconductor sequencing technique is notable[21, 24].
Our study provides, to our knowledge, a currently most rapid, comprehensive, cost-efficient and reliable assay for genetic diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in everyday clinical practice. Implementation of this method will change diagnosis and understanding of the molecular etiologies of HCM.
Materials and methods
HCM resequencing panel design
For the HCM resequencing panel targeted genes selection, recent ten years’ literatures, including prior genetic detection technique articles, reviews and case-reports of HCM, were carefully accessed. To recruit a maximum coverage of the mutation spectrum of this polygenetic disorder, we designed a currently most comprehensive HCM-specific resequencing panel including 30 causal genes that most frequently affected in patients with HCM (Table 1). Then, primers of overlapping amplicons covering the CDS-region and flanking sequences of each targeted gene were automated designed by Ion AmpliSeq™ Ready-to-Use custom designer platform following guide of the website (https://www.ampliseq.com/protected/dashboard.action) (Primers for Semiconductor sequencing are presented in Additional file1: Table S1). With the ability to perform ultrahigh-multiplex PCR reaction in one tube parallelly, the primers were mixed and provided (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) in two primer-pools. Eventually, 97.96% of the targeted region (64.06 kb) was overlapped by 690 about 200 bp-length amplicons.
Patients and DNA sample preparation
With approval from the local ethics committee, 120 unrelated Chinese Han HCM patients confirmed by echocardiography during 2008 to 2013 with written informed consent were included in this study. Two of the 120 patients were from independent HCM pedigrees, carrying known pathogenic mutations rs121913641 and rs121913637 in the same loci (p.R719Q, p.R719W) in gene MYH7, respectively. Genomic DNA (gDNA) of each patient was extracted and RNase managed from peripheral leukocytes, using a DB-S kit (FUJIFILM Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified gDNA was then checked with electrophoresis to avoid fragmental degradation and RNA pollution.
Library preparation and sequencing
Ion Torrent adapter-ligated libraries were builded using Ion Ampliseq™ Library Kit 2.0 (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s protocol within about 5 hours. Briefly, 20 ng gDNA for every sample was quantitated by Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for multiplex PCR amplification with each of the two primer-pools, respectively. The resulting amplicons of the two primer-pools were mixed together, and then ligated to barcodes and Ion Torrent adapters (Life Technologies). Subsequently libraries were purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) using 5-cycles of PCR amplification and further purification, followed by quantification by Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. In order to increase efficiency and reduce costs, sixteen uniquely barcoded libraries were combined together with equal molar ratios for one 318 chip. Subsequent emulsion PCR and enrichment of the sequencing beads of the pooled libraries was performed using the OneTouch system (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol within about 5 hours. Finally, 500 Flows (125 cycles) sequencing was done on the 318- chip using Ion PGM 200 Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) (Life Technologies) (Figure 1).
Raw data from 4.5 hours’ PGM runs were initially processed using the Ion Torrent platform-specific software Torrent Suite v3.6.2 to generate sequence reads, trim adapter sequences, align to the hg19 human reference genome, analyze coverage and call variants (Variants Caller parameter settings see Additional file1: Table S2). Then, all variants were annotated with an online-software Variant Effect Predictor (http://asia.ensembl.org/info/docs/variation/vep/index.html). To predict possible impact of detected non-synonymous variants in exons, all missense substitutions were scored and in-silico-function-predicted by SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_BLink_submit.html) and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/). The putative novel pathogenic variants were further confirmed that were reported neither in the 1000-Genome project database nor in the NCBI dbSNP database. To calculate the importance of novel mutations, conservation test was performed in patients and thirteen other species around the mutated position by COBALT algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/cobalt/cobalt.cgi).
Criteria for functional mutations
To determine a functional variant, the variant should be a Sanger sequencing validated coding variant. If the variant is a previously reported variant, it should be causal mutations in NCBI ClinVar database or HGMD database. If the variant is a novel variant, it should in accordance with none of the following database: the 1000-Genome project database, the NCBI dbSNP database, UCSC common SNP database and the 5000 Exmoes database in Exome Sequencing Project (ESP). If the variant is a missense substitution, it should be evolutionarily conserved and predicted functional damaged by either SIFT or Polyphen-2.
Sanger sequencing validation
All potential functional variants were validated with Sanger sequencing in an Applied Biosystems 3130 capillary sequencer using individual primers in both directions to obsolete false positive errors. The technically uncovered 1304 bp regions of the 13 targeted genes were carefully sequenced directly by Sanger sequencing. No more functional variant was detected in all 120 patients. To evaluate the sensitivity and false-positive-rate of this panel, we randomly selected seven genes (MYH7, MYBPC3, ACTC1, PRKAG2, MYOZ2, ACTN2, JPH2) and sequenced all exons and flanking regulation regions directly by Sanger sequencing in eight subjects from the 120 HCM patients.
One-hundred-and-twenty unrelated patients with HCM were studied. The mean age of male (85/120) was 45 ± 16 years (1, 78) and the maximal wall thickness was 18.34 ± 5.1 mm (14, 46). For female (35/120) the mean age was 51 ± 17 years (15, 86) and the maximal wall thickness was 19.73 ± 4.8 mm (13, 41). The mean left ventricular ejection fractions of male and female are 58 ± 14 and 62 ± 13, respectively. In the 120 HCM patients, 24.2% (29/120) are hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and 19.2% (23/120) have positive family history. (The detailed characteristics of HCM Patients were shown in Additional file1: Table S3).
Sequencing output and coverage
The sequencing of selected regions of 30 HCM-associated genes on the Ion torrent PGM achieved an average output of 595628 mapped reads and 95.51% on target per sample in the 120 HCM specimens. In summary, 99.55% of all target amplicons was covered at least once, 96.98% amplicons was covered at least 20 times, 91.95% amplicons was covered at least 100 times. The mean uniformity of base coverage is 93.24% in this panel. The average read depth in the 64.06 K target region across the 120 samples was ~490 folds (Figure 2). Moreover, chip-loading-rate was improved shortly and polyclonal-rate was reduced significantly after few trails in the beginning of experiments, which result in an increase in mean coverage.
Mutation detection and sanger sequencing validation
The Ion Torrent platform-specific software Torrent Suite v3.6.2 and online software Variant Effect Predictor were employed to align the reads sequences to the human reference genome build hg19, call variants and bioinformatical annotate. Criteria for variant identification were a read coverage of higher than 30-fold. All together, in the 120 patients, 458 known or novel variants were detected by Semiconductor sequencing and on average 80 variants per sample. After Sanger sequencing validation, except 25 variants, 433 variants were determined truly exist. Most of the 25 false-positive miscalls are insertions or deletions and detected in more than one sample. Of these 433 variants, 345 (80%) are predicted to be noncoding or synonymous, whereas 88 (20%) are non-synonymous, including missense mutation and small insertion/deletion, resulting in the change of amino acids (Table 2). Notably, we identified at least one functional variant in 104/120 (87%) HCM patients and found more than one functional variants in 12/120 (10%) HCM patients.Furthermore, the two known positive pathogenic mutations (rs121913641 and rs121913637) in the two probands were successfully identified.
Sensitivity and false-positive-rate evaluation
To further assess the sensitivity and specificity of this HCM panel, direct Sanger sequencing of seven randomly selected genes was performed in eight selected subjects. Finally, 38 variants were detected by semiconductor sequencing, including 35 known variants and 3 novel variants (Table 3). Compared with Sanger sequencing results, 2 variants were failed to be validated. Therefore, the sensitivity of this HCM panel was evaluated as 100% and the false-positive-rate was evaluated as 5%.
This study provides the first comprehensive HCM-specific semiconductor sequencing assay, attempting to facilitate the clinical diagnosis and optimally manage HCM patients. Compared with other NGS platform, semiconductor sequencing has the highest throughput and shortest run time[20, 21]. From DNA extraction to data analysis, within only one day, 64.06 kb targeted CDS and flanking regulating regions of 30 genes in up to sixteen samples can be parallelly scanned using one Ion torrent 318-chip. As described in this article, our workflow leads to a mean coverage of 490X, allowing the reliable detection of sequence variants with high accuracy. On the whole, we identified 140 novel sequence variants, which are not listed in the NCBI dbSNP or 1000-Gemome project databases. By bioinformatical prediction of SIFT and Polyphen-2, we revealed potential functional mutations in known disease genes in 104 (87%) of the 120 patients with HCM. This detection rate is in the expected range and provides much better performance compared with previous studies[7, 19, 25].
To evaluate the capability of our Ion amplicon HCM-specific panel, we carried out assessments of experiments in several aspects. By Sanger sequencing, we dissected the panel technically uncovered 1304 bp regions of the 13 targeted genes in all patients and identified no more potential functional variants. Besides, the panel presented satisfactory results with high sensitivity (100%) and low false-positive-rate (5%) in the following validating tests. Thus, it is reasonable to believe that our panel has enough power to detect potential functional variants in HCM patients.
Ion torrent PGM is considered to have weakness in producing long-homopolymer-associated insertion/deletion errors. Hence, by carefully dissecting the sequences after validation, we found that this kind of primary error type was the most miscall reason in this HCM-panel. Besides, a heterozygous-substitution-miscall (c. T136C, p. F46L) in gene MYH7 was detected in 58 of 120 subjects after Sanger sequencing filtration. Since this miscall exists in high proportion of participants and with high coverage, we suspected that it is due to mistake during multiplex PCR. Although this HCM-panel could generate above false positive mistakes, the following Sanger sequencing verification can easily eliminate them.
Although there were some other HCM-relevant genes reported sporadically, such as TTN, MYPN, CRYAB, MTTL1, RAF1 and FHL1, the connection between them and HCM pathogenesis were not ascertained. Our panel was designed for clinical genetic diagnosis, hence, selected only causal genes. But we will pay attention to these and other candidate genes constantly, and update our panels once they are ascertained to be pathogenesis in the future.
This study established a currently most comprehensive and reliable semiconductor HCM-specific resequencing assay and provided a useful, rapid and cost-effective measure for clinical routine genetic diagnosis of HCM. Implementation of this method will significantly improve routine diagnosis of HCM and change understanding of the molecular etiologies of this disease.
Fokstuen S, Munoz A, Melacini P, Iliceto S, Perrot A, Ozcelik C, Jeanrenaud X, Rieubland C, Farr M, Faber L, Sigwart U, Mach F, Lerch R, Antonarakis SE, Blouin JL: Rapid detection of genetic variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by custom DNA resequencing array in clinical practice. J Med Genet. 2011, 48: 572-576.
Zou Y, Wang J, Liu X, Wang Y, Chen Y, Sun K, Gao S, Zhang C, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Feng X, Song Y, Wu Y, Zhang H, Jia L, Wang H, Wang D, Yan C, Lu M, Zhou X, Song L, Hui R: Multiple gene mutations, not the type of mutation, are the modifier of left ventricle hypertrophy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Mol Biol Rep. 2013, 40: 3969-3976.
Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C: Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012, 60: 705-715.
Ashrafian H, McKenna WJ, Watkins H: Disease pathways and novel therapeutic targets in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Res. 2011, 109: 86-96.
Bos JM, Ommen SR, Ackerman MJ: Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: one, two, or more diseases?. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2007, 22: 193-199.
Ho CY: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2012. Circulation. 2012, 125: 1432-1438.
Meder B, Haas J, Keller A, Heid C, Just S, Borries A, Boisguerin V, Scharfenberger-Schmeer M, Stahler P, Beier M, Weichenhan D, Strom TM, Pfeufer A, Korn B, Katus HA, Rottbauer W: Targeted next-generation sequencing for the molecular genetic diagnostics of cardiomyopathies. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011, 4: 110-122.
Watkins H, Ashrafian H, Redwood C: Inherited cardiomyopathies. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 1643-1656.
Liu W, Hu D, Zhu T, Ma Z, Yang J, Xie W, Li C, Li L, Li T, Bian H, Tong Q: Mutation spectrum in a large cohort of unrelated chinese patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2013, 112: 585-589.
Ho E, Bhindi R, Ashley EA, Figtree GA: Genetic analysis in cardiovascular disease: a clinical perspective. Cardiol Rev. 2011, 19: 81-89.
Charron P, Komajda M: Molecular genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: towards individualized management of the disease. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006, 6: 65-78.
Seidman JG, Seidman C: The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: from mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms. Cell. 2001, 104: 557-567.
Marian AJ: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: from genetics to treatment. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010, 40: 360-369.
Charron P, Arad M, Arbustini E, Basso C, Bilinska Z, Elliott P, Helio T, Keren A, McKenna WJ, Monserrat L, Pankuweit S, Perrot A, Rapezzi C, Ristic A, Seggewiss H, van Langen I, Tavazzi L: Genetic counselling and testing in cardiomyopathies: a position statement of the European society of cardiology working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2010, 31: 2715-2726.
Hershberger RE, Lindenfeld J, Mestroni L, Seidman CE, Taylor MR, Towbin JA: Genetic evaluation of cardiomyopathy–a Heart Failure Society of America practice guideline. J Card Fail. 2009, 15: 83-97.
Ho CY: Genetic considerations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012, 54: 456-460.
Ho CY: Genetics and clinical destiny: improving care in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2010, 122: 2430-2440. discussion 2440
Giannakopoulos G, Frangos C: [Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in 2013]. Rev Med Suisse. 2013, 9 (502): 504-507.
Waldmuller S, Muller M, Rackebrandt K, Binner P, Poths S, Bonin M, Scheffold T: Array-based resequencing assay for mutations causing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Clin Chem. 2008, 54: 682-687.
Voelkerding KV, Dames S, Durtschi JD: Next generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics-principles and application to targeted resequencing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a paper from the 2009 William Beaumont Hospital Symposium on Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2010, 12: 539-551.
Churko JM, Mantalas GL, Snyder MP, Wu JC: Overview of high throughput sequencing technologies to elucidate molecular pathways in cardiovascular diseases. Circ Res. 2013, 112: 1613-1623.
Carvill GL, Heavin SB, Yendle SC, McMahon JM, O’Roak BJ, Cook J, Khan A, Dorschner MO, Weaver M, Calvert S, Malone S, Wallace G, Stanley T, Bye AM, Bleasel A, Howell KB, Kivity S, Mackay MT, Rodriguez-Casero V, Webster R, Korczyn A, Afawi Z, Zelnick N, Lerman-Sagie T, Lev D, Moller RS, Gill D, Andrade DM, Freeman JL: Targeted resequencing in epileptic encephalopathies identifies de novo mutations in CHD2 and SYNGAP1. Nat Genet. 2013, 45: 825-830.
Elliott AM, Radecki J, Moghis B, Li X, Kammesheidt A: Rapid detection of the ACMG/ACOG-recommended 23 CFTR disease-causing mutations using ion torrent semiconductor sequencing. J Biomol Tech. 2012, 23: 24-30.
Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, Pallen MJ: Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol. 2012, 30: 434-439.
Lopes LR, Zekavati A, Syrris P, Hubank M, Giambartolomei C, Dalageorgou C, Jenkins S, McKenna W, Plagnol V, Elliott PM: Genetic complexity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy revealed by high-throughput sequencing. J Med Genet. 2013, 50: 228-239.
Wilde AA, Behr ER: Genetic testing for inherited cardiac disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013, 10: 571-583.
We thank the patients for consenting to participate in this study and publication. This work was funded by grants of the National “973” projects (No. 2012AA02A510; No. 2013CB531105) and National Natural Science Foundation of China, Project (No. 81170159).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ZL carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. JH collected data and participated in the statistical analysis. JZ, CC and HW participated in sample collection. HD helped to design the study, DWW (Dao Wu Wang) and DWW (Dao Wen Wang) conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Zongzhe Li, Jin Huang contributed equally to this work.