Open Access

Fusion of Hsp70 to Mage-a1 enhances the potency of vaccine-specific immune responses

Journal of Translational Medicine201311:300

https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-300

Received: 31 July 2013

Accepted: 27 November 2013

Published: 5 December 2013

Abstract

Background

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are capable of promoting antigen presentation of chaperoned peptides through interactions with receptors on antigen presenting cells. This property of HSPs suggests a potential function as an adjuvant-free carrier to stimulate immune responses against a covalently linked fusion partner. MAGE-A1 is a likely candidate for tumor immunotherapy due to its abundant immunogenic epitopes and strict tumor specificity. To analyze the influence of HSP70 conjugation to MAGE-A1, towards developing a novel effective vaccine against MAGE-expressing tumors, we cloned the murine counterpart of the human HSP70 and MAGE-A1 genes.

Methods

Recombinant proteins expressing Mage-a1 (aa 118–219), Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion were purified and used to immunize C57BL/6 mice. The humoral and cellular responses elicited against Mage-a1 were measured by ELISA, IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, and cytotoxicity assay.

Results

Immunization of mice with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein elicited significantly higher Mage-a1-specific antibody titers than immunization with either Mage-a1 alone or a combination of Mage-a1 + Hsp70. The frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells and the cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity was also elevated. Consistent with the elevated immune response, immunization with fusion protein induced potent in vivo antitumor immunity against MAGE-a1-expressing tumors.

Conclusions

These results indicate that the fusion of Hsp70 to Mage-a1 can enhance immune responses and anti-tumor effects against Mage-a1-expressing tumors. Fusion of HSP70 to a tumor antigen may greatly enhance the potency of protein vaccines and can potentially be applied to other cancer systems with known tumor-specific antigens. These findings provide a scientific basis for the development of a novel HSP70 and MAGE fusion protein vaccine against MAGE-expressing tumors.

Keywords

Mage-a1 Heat-shock protein 70 Protein vaccine Humoral immunity Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

Background

The molecular cloning of MAGE-1 by van der Bruggen et al. in 1991 provided a major breakthrough in identifying tumor antigens recognized by host cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). Using the melanoma cell line MZ2-MEL and autologous CTL clones cytolytic to this line, MAGE-1 (subsequently re-named MAGE-A1/melanoma antigen A1) was identified as the target antigen for one of the CTL clones, representing the first immunogenic tumor antigen shown to elicit autologous CTL responses in a cancer patient [1]. Subsequent studies showed that MAGE-A1 is a member of a family (the MAGE gene family) encoding proteins that are classified as tumor antigens, also referred to as cancer testis (CT) antigens. These antigens are expressed by tumors of different histological types, but are silenced in normal cells (with the exception of the male germ-line cells of the testis, which do not express MHC class I molecules and are therefore incapable of presenting antigens to CTLs). More than 100 CT antigen family proteins have now been identified, and some of these have been shown to be capable of eliciting immune responses [2]. Because CT antigens are immunogenic and their expression is highly restricted to tumors, they represent an ideal target for tumor immunotherapy.

Tumor vaccines derived from MAGE-A1 have been used in several small–scale phase I/II therapeutic vaccination trials. Patients with advanced malignancies of cutaneous melanoma, non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or head and neck, esophageal, or bladder cancer were enrolled in these trials. These trials consisted of antigenic peptides, protein, recombinant poxvirus-encoding mini-genes, or dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with antigenic peptide. No significant toxicity was reported; however, only a small proportion of the patients (10 to 20%) showed evidence of tumor regression [37]. Therefore, it is important to develop a more potent MAGE-A1-based vaccine.

The combined use of heat shock proteins (HSPs) has been explored as a strategy for enhancing vaccine potency [815]. HSPs are a large family that includes inducible and also ubiquitously and constitutively expressed protein chaperones [10]. The effect of HSPs on immunotherapy was first indicated by the demonstration that HSPs purified from tumor cells, but not normal tissues, can immunize animals to generate tumor-specific immunity. The immunogenicity of the tumor-derived HSPs was shown to be dependent on the peptides associated with HSP molecules rather than the HSPs per se[11].

HSP-based cancer vaccines, including tumor-derived HSP-peptide complex, artificially reconstituted HSP-peptide complex, HSP-based DNA cancer vaccines, and HSP fusion protein, have been widely explored in tumor models [12]. Among these HSP preparations in different formulations, the fusion protein strategy, which allows covalent linkage of multiple antigenic epitopes to a single HSP fusion protein, has been shown to be successful, simple and feasible. The adjuvant property of mycobacterial HSP70 fusion protein has been extensively studied using HIV-1 p24 [13], ovalbumin [14], influenza nucleoprotein [15], MAGE-1 [8] and MAGE-3 [9] as model antigens. In the latter two studies [8, 9], a fusion protein linking Mycobacterium tuberculosis HSP70 and a human MAGE was used to elicit anti-tumor effects against a mouse melanoma cell line, B16, which was transfected into mice. Although the HSP70-MAGE fusion proteins elicited stronger cellular and humoral immune responses against MAGE-expressing tumors than those elicited by MAGE protein alone, the specificity of the response could be of concern. The use of Mycobacterial HSP70 as an adjuvant in a murine model could elicit cross-reaction with host HSP and thereby induce inappropriate autoimmune responses, including autoimmune-mediated intestinal inflammation [16, 17]. Additionally, there are likely to be differences in the processing and presentation of human epitope peptides by the murine MHC system in this model. Thus, the combination of proteins from different species may impart a level of complexity in interpreting the results. To eliminate the risk of inducing autoimmune disorders and to reflect a more authentic murine immune response to tumor antigens, in this study the murine counterpart of the human HSP70 and MAGE-A1 genes (designated Hsp70 and Mage-a1) were cloned. Prokaryotic plasmids were constructed to express a Mage-a1 (aa 118–219) gene segment, Hsp70, and the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein. The recombinant proteins were expressed and purified for immunization of mice. We demonstrate that linkage of Hsp70 to Mage-a1 enhances the immunogenicity of Mage-a1, which results in increased antitumor humoral and cellular immunity against Mage-a1-expressing murine melanoma cells.

Materials and methods

Construction of prokaryotic protein expression vectors

The sequences of the Mus musculus Hsp70 and Mage-a1 genes [GenBank: NM_010479 and NM_020015] were used as references for primer design. Forward Primer (5’-gaattc gccaagaacacggcgatcggcat-3’ and reverse primer 5’-gtcgac aatccacctcctcgatggtgggt-3’) flanked respectively by Eco R1 and Sal 1 restriction sites (italics) were used to amplify the coding sequence for the 2nd to the last amino acid of the Hsp70 gene. Forward Primer (5’- ggatcc accaaagcagaaatgttggaaag-3’) and reverse primer (5’- gaattc accacacaatcctatgttattca -3’) flanked respectively by Bam H1and Eco R1 restriction sites (italics) were used to amplify the coding sequence of the Mage-a1gene segment (aa 118–219). DNA extracted from liver tissue of a C57BL/6 mouse was used as template to amplify the Hsp70 and Mage-a1 genes. The PCR products of the two segments were first cloned separately into pGEM-T vector (Promega, USA). After verification by sequencing, recombinant pGEM-T vectors were digested with restriction enzymes, and the isolated segments were separately cloned into pGEX4T-1 to construct pGEX4T-1-Hsp70 and pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1 expression vectors. Then, the Mage-a1 segment was inserted into Bam H1- and Eco R1-digested pGEX4T-1-Hsp70 vector to obtain the Mage-a1 (aa 118–219)/Hsp70 fusion protein expression vector, pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1-Hsp70. All recombinant expression vectors were verified by sequencing.

Protein expression and purification

The pGEX4T-1, pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1, pGEX4T-1-Hsp70 and pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1-Hsp70 constructs were transformed into E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) (Novagen, USA). Bacterial cultures were grown to OD600 ≈ 0.5, and then protein expression was induced by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl β-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the growth media. Bacteria were cultured at 32°C for 4 hours and then harvested by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended in PBS (4.3 mM Na2HPO4, 1.47 mM KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, and 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.3) and stored frozen at −20°C. Upon purification, the suspension was thawed at room temperature. NP-40 was added to the cell suspension at a final concentration of 0.1%, and lysozyme was added at a final concentration of 45 kU/gram of cell paste. Cell pellets were sonicated to suspend thoroughly and shear the DNA. The tubes were centrifuged at high speed to precipitate the cellular debris while leaving the soluble protein in the supernatant. As the target proteins have a glutathione S-transferase (GST) tag, the GST · Band Kit (Novagen, USA), an affinity chromatography column with GST Binding Resin was used to purify the proteins according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Cell lines

Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 mg/ml of streptomycin, and 100 U/ml of penicillin in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO2. A murine melanoma cell line B16 was used to generate the B16-Mage-a1 cell line, which stably expresses the Mus musculus Mage-a1 gene. To establish the B16-Mage-a1 cell line, the eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA3.1-Mage-a1 was constructed and transfected into B16 cells. Transfected cells were grown in medium containing 600 μg/ml G418 (Sigma, USA) until single colonies appeared. The expression of Mage-a1 in B16-Mage-a1 was determined by RT-PCR (data not shown).

Mice and vaccination

C57BL/6 mice were obtained from the laboratory animal center of Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). All of the mice were 6 week old females bred and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions. Purified GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein, or a combination of Mage-a1 + Hsp70 proteins, were diluted to 200 pmol. Six groups of mice were immunized sub-cutaneously with 0.2 ml of each protein or PBS control, followed by a booster after 1 week. All the procedures are in accordance with the guidelines of the laboratory animal ethics committee of Sun Yat-sen University.

Anti-Mage-a1 ELISA

Anti-Mage-a1 antibody in the sera of vaccinated mice was determined by ELISA. Briefly, a 96-well flat-bottom ELISA plate was coated with 50 μl of 2.5 μg/ml Mage-a1 protein (aa 118–219) overnight at room temperature. The plate was rinsed with PBS, incubated with blocking buffer (5% nonfat dry milk powder and 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS) for 2 h at 37°C. Mouse serum was diluted 1:50 in blocking buffer, added to the plate, and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. After rinsing with PBS, the plate was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotech Inc., USA) for 1 h at 37°C. After extensive washing, Tetramethyl-benzidine substrate was added, and plates were incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The reactions were stopped with 2 M H2SO4, and the ELISA plates were read at 450 nm.

IFN-γ ELISPOT

Mice were sacrificed two weeks after the immunization booster was injected. Splenocytes were isolated using EZ-Sep Mouse 1X Lymphocyte Separation Medium (Dakewe, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. IFN-γ production of T cell precursors was determined by using the Quick Spot Mouse IFN-γ Pre-coated ELISPOT kit (Dakewe, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. PVDF-bottomed 96-well plates were pre-coated with anti-IFN-γ antibody. A total of 200 μl of RPMI 1640 was added to each well, plates were incubated for 10 min, and then medium was removed. 5 × 105 splenocytes/well and 3 × 104 B16-Mage-a1 cells/well were added. As a positive control, 5 × 104 splenocytes/well and 4 μg/ml phytohemagglutinin (PHA) were added. As a negative control, only serum-free culture medium was added. Plates were incubated without agitation for 24 h at 37°C. Cells were then removed and biotinylated IFN-γ detection antibody was added and plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Free antibody was washed out, and plates were incubated with streptavidinalkaline phosphatase for 1 h at 37°C, followed by 10 washes with PBST and visualization with alkaline phosphatase substrate AEC. The number of dots in each well was counted using Biosys Bioreader 4000 PRO (Bio-sys, German). The experiment was repeated three times.

Cytotoxicity assays

The Cytotoxic 96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay (Promega, USA) was used to detect the cytotoxic activity of splenocytes from mice immunized with the protein vaccines. This assay quantitatively measures lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a stable cytosolic enzyme that is released upon cell lysis. To develop the effector cells, splenocytes isolated as in the ELISPOT assay were co-cultured with lethally irradiated (10000 rad of 60Co) B16-Mage-a1 cells in the presence of 40 U/ml rhIL-2 (Cytolab Ltd./Peprotech Asia, USA) for 3 days at 37°C. According the manufacturer's instructions, we first optimized the number of B16-Mage-a1 target cells at 1 × 104 and then set up the 96 well assay plate. In the experimental wells, effector cells at a ratio of 1:2.5, 1:5, and 1:10 were added to 1 × 104 target cells to a final volume of 200 μl. The plate was incubated for 45 min at 37°C and centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min. Subsequently, 50 μl supernatant from each well was transferred to a new plate, and 50 μl substrate mix was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in darkness. A total of 50 μl stop solution was added to each well, and the absorbance values were measured at 490 nm. The cytotoxicity for each effector: target cell ratio was calculated as [A(experimental)-A(effector spontaneous)-A(target spontaneous)] × 100%/[A(target maximum)-A(target spontaneous)].

In vivo mouse tumor challenge

For inoculation of tumor cells, cultured cells were collected and washed twice in serum-free RPMI 1640. Viable cells were counted using trypan blue and a cell meter. Cell suspensions were adjusted to a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml, and 0.1 ml cell suspension was inoculated sub-cutaneously in the upper flank of mice. For tumor protection experiments, 6 groups of mice were immunized with GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70, Mage-a1-Hsp70 or the PBS control, followed by a booster after one week. One week after the booster, mice were challenged with 1 × 105 B16-Mage-a1 cells/mouse. For in vivo tumor treatment experiments, another 6 groups of mice were first challenged with 1 × 105 B16-Mage-a1 cells/mouse. At 3 days and 10 days post-tumor cell inoculation, mice were immunized. Tumor growth was observed every day. Tumor length and width were measured at fixed time intervals. The tumor volume was defined as V (V = length × width2 × 0.5), where V represents the mean value of tumors in each group. Mice were sacrificed when the tumor length reached 15 mm.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried out using Graphpad Prism 5 software for Windows. Results are presented as mean ± standard error (SE). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Expression and purification of recombinant proteins

To determine whether fusion of Mage-a1 to Hsp70 can increase the potency of vaccination against Mage-expressing tumors, we expressed Mus musculus Mage-a1, Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion proteins using the prokaryotic expression vector pGEX4T1, which produces GST-tagged recombinant proteins (Figure 1A). Only part of the Mage-a1 coding sequence (aa 118–219) was cloned because full length Mage-a1 failed to produce detectable protein after IPTG induction. High level protein expression was induced by IPTG for the control pGEX4T1 vector and the three GST tagged vectors in E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) cells, and the proteins were purified by GST affinity chromatography (Figure 1B-D). A single predominate band of expected size of the purified protein was isolated for each of these proteins, though additional faint bands could be observed in each purification, indicating that some level of degradation or contamination may have occurred. In an attempt to remove the GST tag of the recombinant protein before use in the vaccine experiment, we digested the proteins with thrombin; however, recombinant Hsp70 protein was cut to several bands after thrombin digestion, potentially due to nonspecific thrombin cleavage recognition sites in the Hsp70 sequence (data not shown). Therefore, the GST tags in the recombinant proteins were not removed, and instead, a GST control group was added to our experiments to exclude the effects of the GST tag or common contaminants.
Figure 1

Construction of vectors and recombinant protein expression and purification. A. Schematic representation of recombinant pGEX4T1 vectors. Mage-a1 (aa118-219) gene segment, Hsp70 and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion gene were cloned into pGEX4T1 vector downstream of the GST sequence. B. GST protein was expressed by the vector pGEX4T-1 in E. coli Rosetta 2. M, protein molecular weight markers. Lanes 1–2, whole cell lysate without and with IPTG induction. Lane 3, purified GST protein. C. Mage-a1 protein expressed by recombinant vector pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1. M, protein molecular weight markers. Lanes 1–2, whole cell lysate without and with IPTG induction. Lanes 3–4, purified Mage-a1 protein at 2× or 1× loading concentration. D. Hsp70 and Mage-a1-Hsp70 protein expressed by recombinant vector pGEX4T-1-Hsp70 and pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1-Hsp70. M, protein molecular weight markers. Lanes 1–2, whole cell lysate of E. coli Rosetta 2 transformed with pGEX4T-1-Hsp70 without and with IPTG induction. Lanes 3–4, purified Hsp70 protein at 1× or 2× loading concentration. Lanes 5–6, whole cell lysate of E. coli Rosetta 2 transformed with pGEX4T-1-Mage-a1-Hsp70 without and with IPTG induction. Lanes 7–8, purified Mage-a1-Hsp70 protein at 1× or 2× loading concentration.

Enhanced induction of Mage-a1-specific humoral immune responses by fusion of Mage-a1 with Hsp70

To examine the immune response elicited by the purified proteins, six groups of mice were injected sub-cutaneously with GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 (1:1 mixture). Mice were also injected with 0.2 ml PBS as an additional control. One week later, a booster vaccine was administered, and two weeks after the booster, the quantity of anti-Mage-a1 antibody in the sera of the vaccinated mice was determined by ELISA. Mice vaccinated with PBS control, GST and Hsp70 proteins showed low or undetectable levels of anti Mage-a1 antibody. In contrast, mice vaccinated with Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 had elevated levels of anti-Mage-a1 antibody. Of these three, the mice vaccinated with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein produced the highest levels of anti-Mage-a1 antibody (Figure 2). These results verify that Mage-a1 fusion to Hsp70 leads to an elevated humoral immune response against Mage-a1.
Figure 2

Humoral immune response after vaccination with Hsp70-Mage-a1 fusion protein. Purified GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein or a combination of Mage-a1 + Hsp70, were diluted to a concentration of 200 pmol. Mice were immunized sub-cutaneously with a PBS control or 0.2 ml of each protein, followed by a booster injection after one week. Serum samples were obtained two weeks after the booster. The levels of anti-Mage-a1 antibody were examined by ELISA. The means ± SE of the absorbance (A540 nm) of three separate experiments are presented at 1:50 dilution. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA showed that mice vaccinated with Mage-a1-Hsp70 had significantly higher titers of anti Mage-a1 antibody than Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 (* p < 0.001).

Enhanced induction of T-cell-mediated Mage-a1-specific immune responses by fusion of Mage-a1 with Hsp70

To determine whether mice can induce T-cell-mediated Mage-a1-specific immune responses after vaccination with Mage-a1-Hsp70, mice were immunized and the splenocytes were harvested and pooled two weeks after administration of the booster. B16-Mage-a1-specific IFN-γ production of T cell precursors was determined by ELISPOT assay, which is a sensitive functional assay used for the identification and enumeration of cytokine-producing cells at the single cell level. As shown in Figure 3A, very few spot-forming T cell precursors were observed in the splenocytes from mice injected with PBS, GST or Hsp70 control proteins. However, there were many more spot-forming T cell precursors in the splenocytes from mice injected with Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein. Moreover, the number of spot-forming cells in the Mage-a1-Hsp70 group was higher than the Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 groups. This result suggests that Mage-a1 can elicit B16-Mage-a1-specific IFN-γ production by splenic T cell precursors, but that the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein has a stronger effect than Mage-a1 alone or Mage-a1 separately combined with Hsp70.
Figure 3

T-cell-mediated immune response after vaccination with Hsp70-Mage-a1 fusion protein. C57BL/6 mice were immunized with purified GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 and then administered a booster immunization after one week. Two weeks after the booster, pooled splenocyte cultures were prepared and re-stimulated. A. IFN-γ-producing T cells in splenocytes of immunized mice were quantified by using ELISPOT. Data are presented as mean ± SE of three separate experiments. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA revealed that mice vaccinated with Mage-a1-Hsp70 generated more IFN-γ spots than Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 (* p < 0.001). B. The CTL response induced in splenocytes of immunized mice was determined by using CytoTox 96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay. Data are presented as mean ± SE of three separate experiments. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA revealed that Mag-a1-specific lysis of CTLs from mice vaccinated with Mage-a1-Hsp70 was higher than those vaccinated with Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 at all effector: target cell ratios (* p < 0.001).

To assess whether B16-Mage-a1-specific CTLs are induced in immunized mice, splenocytes were also assesses by cytotoxicity assay. Effector cells were obtained by co-culture of splenocytes with lethally irradiated B16-Mage-a1 cells at increasing ratios. As shown in Figure 3B. The percentage of CTLs undergoing B16-Mage-a1-specific lysis was less than 10% in splenocytes from mice injected with PBS control, GST and Hsp70 proteins. However, splenocytes from mice injected with Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70 and Mage-a1-Hsp70 showed higher levels of lysis than the controls. Furthermore, the Mage-a1-Hsp70 group promoted more CTL lysis than the Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 groups. Together, these results suggest that Mage-a1 vaccine can induce Mage-a1-specific T-cell-mediated immune responses and that the fusion of Mage-a1 with Hsp70 protein can enhance this effect.

Prophylactic immunization with the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein confers protection against Mage-a1-expressing tumors

To further verify the immune response induced by Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein, in vivo tumor protection was investigated in C57BL/6 mice. One week after the booster, mice were challenged with B16-Mage-a1 cells. The PBS control mice and mice vaccinated with GST and Hsp70 proteins developed measureable tumors starting at 13 days after the tumor cell challenge (Figure 4A). However, 100% of mice vaccinated with the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein remained tumor-free until 19 days after challenge, whereas mice vaccinated with Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 remained tumor-free until 16 days after challenge. Mage-a1 containing vaccines also induced a significant growth repression for tumors that developed subsequently, with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein showing a stronger effect than Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 (Figure 4B). Therefore, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein both delays the development of tumors and represses the growth of Mage-a1-expressing tumors in vaccinated mice.
Figure 4

Prophylactic immunization with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein protects mice against B16-Mage-a1 tumor cell challenge. C57BL/6 mice were immunized with purified GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 and then administered a booster immunization after one week. A week after the booster, the mice were challenged with 1 × 105 B16-Mage-a1 melanoma cells. A. The tumor free status of mice was recorded as the percentage of mice remaining tumor-free every three days after tumor challenge. B. Tumor growth was recorded as the mean tumor volume (in mm3). Error bars depict the SE, n = 8 mice/group. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA revealed that from days 31 to 37 vaccination with Mage-a1-Hsp70 significantly delayed tumor growth in the B16-Mage-a1 tumor model compared to vaccination with Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 (* p < 0.01).

Therapeutic immunization with the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein confers protection against the progression of established tumors

Given that immunization of mice with the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein conferred protection against challenge with B16-Mage-a1 cells, we further investigated whether immunization with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein could block the progression of pre-established tumors. C57BL/6 mice were injected with 1 × 105 B16-Mage-a1 cells. At 3 and 10 days post-tumor cell inoculation, mice were immunized, and tumor development was assessed every 3 days thereafter. The mice vaccinated with PBS, GST or Hsp70 control proteins developed tumors starting at 13 days after the tumor cell challenge (Figure 5A). However, 100% of mice receiving Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein vaccination remained tumor-free 16 days after the tumor cell challenge, whereas only 62.5% and 75% mice receiving Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 vaccination remained tumor-free. The tumor growth also was repressed in mice vaccinated with Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70 compared to vaccination with PBS and the other control proteins (Figure 5B), though the effect was not as dramatic as for the prophylactic immunization (Figure 4B). Nevertheless, these results suggest that the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein has protective effects both for prophylactic and therapeutic immunization against Mage-a1-expressing tumors in mice.
Figure 5

Therapeutic immunization with the Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein confers protection against the progression of established tumors. Mice were challenged with 1 × 105 B16-Mage-a1 cells. At 3 and 10 days post-tumor cell inoculation, mice were immunized with purified GST, Hsp70, Mage-a1, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein or a combination of Mage-a1 + Hsp70. A. The tumor free status of mice was recorded as the percentage of mice remaining tumor free after tumor challenge. B. Tumor growth was recorded as the mean tumor volume (in mm3). Error bars depict the SE, n = 8 mice/group. Statistical analysis by two-way ANOVA revealed that vaccination with Mage-a1-Hsp70 significantly delayed tumor growth in the B16-Mage-a1 tumor model compared to vaccination with Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70 from days 31 to 37 (* p < 0.05).

Discussion

Because the MAGE-A1 antigens are shared by many tumors and because of their strict tumor specificity, they are of particular interest for cancer immunotherapy. The MAGE-A1 gene encodes several antigenic peptides that bind to HLA class I or class II molecules and are recognized by T lymphocytes on tumor cells [1820]. These antigens have been used for small-scale therapeutic vaccination trials of cancer patients [37]. However, generally, the induced immune response is weak, necessitating the development of other immunization approaches to increase the efficacy of the vaccines.

Heat shock proteins have demonstrated increasingly more effective use as adjuvants in the immunotherapy of malignant tumors and infectious diseases. Antigen fusion with hsp70 has proven powerful as a strategy to increase the immunogenicity of a conjugated protein [9, 1315]. To study the adjuvant property of HSP70 fusion in enhancing a MAGE-A1-based vaccine in a preclinical mouse model, we constructed prokaryotic plasmids and expressed and purified recombinant Mage-a1, Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion proteins. The choice of using Mage-a1-Hsp70 recombinant fusion protein for immunization was based on several theoretical advantages over vaccines consisting of commonly used “short” peptides. First, after being taken up, processed, and presented by professional APCs, Mage-a1 long proteins are much more likely to elicit an integrated immune response consisting of a variety of CD4+, CD8+, and B cell responses [21, 22]. Second, it is likely that protein vaccination leads to the presentation of epitopes that can be presented by a variety of HLA alleles, and therefore this type of vaccine should be applicable to any patient regardless of HLA restriction. In addition, the fused Hsp70 protein can activate professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and cross-present chaperoned antigenic peptides to MHC class I molecules to generate specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes [23].

The fusion proteins were purified to high homogeneity; however, faint lower molecular weight bands in each purification reaction suggests a possibility that some effects may be due to degraded recombinant proteins, or possibly contaminants. However, the addition of several controls, including PBS alone, vector alone, and each protein either alone or purified separately and then combined, provides verification of our results. Furthermore, our results are consistent with two other studies involving HSP70-MAGE fusions of mixed species origin [8, 9]. In the latter studies a fusion protein composed of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-derived HSP70 (MtHSP70) and human-derived MAGE was injected into mice; whereas this study tested a fusion protein composed of murine Hsp70 and murine Mage-a1 in mice. The use of a same-species proteins may be advantageous for several reasons: first, the use of murine-derived protein in a mouse model may reduce the risk of inducing autoimmune disease; second, the affinity of murine-derived Hsp70 to Hsp70 receptors on mouse DCs is likely to be higher than the corresponding affinity of MtHSP70; and third, the murine MHC system may more effectively process and present epitope peptides of murine tumor antigens than antigens from human tumors. Therefore, our study both confirms and extends the previous findings by providing a more authentic model.

After the mice were immunized with the protein vaccine, we observed both humoral and cellular immune responses. The humoral response was determined by measuring the quantity of anti-Mage-a1 antibody in the sera of vaccinated mice. The cellular response was determined by measuring B16-Mage-a1-specific IFN-γ production by T cell precursors and B16-Mage-a1-specific CTLs from splenocytes of immunized mice. We demonstrated that mice immunized with GST, Hsp70 protein or PBS control have low or undetectable levels of anti-Mage-a1 antibody in sera, minimal IFN-γ production of T cell precursors from splenocytes, and low-level activation of B16-Mage-a1-specific CTL lysis. Compared with GST, Hsp70 protein or PBS controls, vaccination with Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein enhanced both the humoral and cellular response, as indicated by elevated serum Mage-a1-specific antibody, increased Mage-a1-specific IFN-γ production and CTL cytotoxicity. Moreover, Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein vaccine induced a more dramatic response than Mage-a1 or Mage-a1 + Hsp70. Though the effect of fusion was more obvious for the cellular response than for the humoral response, it is likely that an interplay between these two immune responses contributes to the vaccine efficacy of Mage-a1-Hsp70. Similar to our findings with Mage-a1, fusion of murine Hsp70 with Hantaan virus nucleocapsid protein (HTNV NP) enhances both the humoral and cellular response to the HTNV NP, but the effects on the cellular response are more obvious [24]. Further study is needed to determine the relative contribution of the humoral response to the efficacy of the Mage-a1-Hsp70 vaccine.

Consistent with the immune responses, in vivo tumor protection by vaccination was demonstrated by prophylactic immunization. B16 tumor xenografts in mice immunized with Mage-a1, Mage-a1 + Hsp70, and Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein grew significantly slower than that in mice immunized with GST, Hsp70 protein or PBS control. The tumor size of mice immunized with Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein was also much smaller than that of Mage-a1 and Mage-a1 + Hsp70-immunized mice. In addition, we demonstrated that therapeutic immunization can delay the progression of established tumors, though this effect was decreased compared with the prophylactic immunization. This result suggests that Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein is more proficient at inhibiting tumor development when used earlier in the progression of cancer, suggesting a preferential application for using this vaccine to prevent tumor recurrence in postoperative cancer patients.

The pro-immune effects of HSPs may be related to their molecular properties as intracellular stress proteins. In addition to their involvement in the degradation pathway of cellular proteins during stress condition, HSPs facilitate the correct folding of newly synthesized proteins and are also directly involved in the translocation of proteins across membranes into different cellular compartments [11, 2527]. After exiting the cell and entering the extracellular environment, peptides chaperoned by heat shock proteins can be taken up by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as macrophages and DCs. In the cytosol, the associated peptides are cross-presented via endogenous MHC class-I and exogenous MHC class-II pathways [2830]. Several receptors for HSPs, have been described on APCs, such as CD14 [31], CD40 [32, 33], CD91 [3436], C-type lectin family scavenger receptor A (SR-A) [37], Lox-1 [38] and the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) 2 and 4 [39]. Binding of HSPs to these receptors could promote the maturation and activation of DCs by stimulating DCs to express MHC class II molecules or to secrete cytokines and chemokines [33, 40]. As a consequence of the dual function of this chaperone-peptide presentation on MHC class-I and -II molecules, as well as its adjuvant property, efficient peptide-specific T-cell stimulation is achieved. Antigen-HSP70 fusion proteins can generate specific CD8+ T cells responses independent of CD4+ T cell help [41, 42]. A possible mechanism for this ability is the activation of DCs to release proinflammatory cytokines, as well as the intrinsic molecular chaperone function of HSP70. Endogenous IL-2 also probably plays an important role in this process. These functions of HSPs may explain the enhanced potency of Mage-a1 when fused to Hsp70.

MAGE-A1 is expressed in diverse histological types of primary and metastatic tumors, such as melanoma, bladder, breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers [43]. The expression on tumors of most histological origins supports the use of the MAGE-A1-HSP70 fusion protein in vaccines for a wide range of cancers expressing MAGE-A1. The strict tumor specificity of this antigen should minimize the damage to normal tissues following immunization. In addition, several MAGE-A1 epitopes recognized by T cells have been identified. Those epitopes can be presented by HLA-A1, A2, A3, A68, B37, B7, B35, B37, B53, and B57, making MAGE-A1-HSP70 fusion protein vaccine available for most (up to 87%) of the HLA types [1820, 44].

The MAGE-A family consists of several subtypes, including MAGE-A1 to MAGE-A12. Although they are expressed by many histologically different neoplasias, individual MAGE-A expression varies among tumor types [45]. However, the theoretical frequency by which cancer cells express at least one of the MAGE-A antigens is reported to be very high [46, 47]. Because we have successfully produced a Mage-a1 and Hsp70 fusion protein vaccine and have demonstrated the efficacy of this strategy in increasing the anti tumor immunogenicity against Mage-a1-expressing tumors, we can apply this strategy to other subtypes of MAGE-A to expand the number of patients eligible for MAGE-A and HSP70 fusion protein immunotherapy. To reach an optimal anti-tumor effect for cancer patients, a mixed vaccine with multiple MAGE-A-HSP70 fusion proteins will be desirable.

Conclusions

In summary, our results indicate that Mage-a1-Hsp70 fusion protein can elicit stronger Mage-a1-specific immune responses and antitumor effects against Mage-a1-expressing tumor than Mage-a1 alone or a combination of Mage-a1 + Hsp70. Thus, HSP70 fusion represents a novel and potentially promising strategy to design MAGE-based vaccines for achieving protective immunity against malignant tumors that express MAGE antigen.

Abbreviations

HSPs: 

Heat shock proteins

CT: 

Cancer testis

CTL: 

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte

GST: 

Glutathione S-transferase

DC: 

Dendritic cells

APC: 

Antigen-presenting cells

ELISA: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ELISPOT: 

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot

HLA: 

Human leukocyte antigen

MHC: 

Major histocompatibility complex.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81272901 to Juhong Jiang), the open foundation of State Key Laboratory of oncology in Southern China (No. HN2012-02 to Juhong Jiang), the PhD Start-up Fund of Guangzhou Medical University (No. 2011C35 to Juhong Jiang).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University
(3)
Department of Pathology, Fujian Medical University
(4)
Department of Pathology, Kiang Wu Hospital
(5)
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

References

  1. Re van der Bruggen P, Traversari C, Chomez P, Lurquin C, De Plaen E, Van den Eynde B, Knuth A, Boon T: A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma. Science. 1991, 254 (5038): 1643-1647. 10.1126/science.1840703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. CTDatabase. [(http://www.cta.lncc.br/index.php)]
  3. van Baren N, Bonnet MC, Dréno B, Khammari A, Dorval T, Piperno-Neumann S, Liénard D, Speiser D, Marchand M, Brichard VG, Escudier B, Négrier S, Dietrich PY, Maraninchi D, Osanto S, Meyer RG, Ritter G, Moingeon P, Tartaglia J, van der Bruggen P, Coulie PG, Boon T: Tumoral and immunologic response after vaccination of melanoma patients with an ALVAC virus encoding MAGE antigens recognized by T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (35): 9008-9021. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Slingluff CL, Petroni GR, Olson W, Czarkowski A, Grosh WW, Smolkin M, Chianese-Bullock KA, Neese PY, Deacon DH, Nail C, Merrill P, Fink R, Patterson JW, Rehm PK: Helper T-cell responses and clinical activity of a melanoma vaccine with multiple peptides from MAGE and melanocytic differentiation antigens. J Clin Oncol. 2008, 26 (30): 4973-4980. 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.3161.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mackensen A, Herbst B, Chen JL, Köhler G, Noppen C, Herr W, Spagnoli GC, Cerundolo V, Lindemann A: Phase I study in melanoma patients of a vaccine with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells generated in vitro from CD34 (+) hematopoietic progenitor cells. Int J Cancer. 2000, 86 (3): 385-392. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000501)86:3<385::AID-IJC13>3.0.CO;2-T.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chianese-Bullock KA, Pressley J, Garbee C, Hibbitts S, Murphy C, Yamshchikov G, Petroni GR, Bissonette EA, Neese PY, Grosh WW, Merrill P, Fink R, Woodson EM, Wiernasz CJ, Patterson JW, Slingluff CL: MAGE-A1-, MAGE-A10-, and gp100-derived peptides are immunogenic when combined with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and montanide ISA-51 adjuvant and administered as part of a multipeptide vaccine for melanoma. J Immunol. 2005, 174 (5): 3080-3086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Akiyama Y, Tanosaki R, Inoue N, Shimada M, Hotate Y, Yamamoto A, Yamazaki N, Kawashima I, Nukaya I, Takesako K, Maruyama K, Takaue Y, Yamaguchi K: Clinical response in Japanese metastatic melanoma patients treated with peptide cocktail-pulsed dendritic cells. J Transl Med. 2005, 3 (1): 4-10.1186/1479-5876-3-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ye J, Chen GS, Song HP, Li ZS, Huang YY, Qu P, Sun YJ, Zhang XM, Sui YF: Heat shock protein 70/MAGE-1 tumor vaccine can enhance the potency of MAGE-1-specific cellular immune responses in vivo. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2004, 53 (9): 825-834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ma JH, Sui YF, Ye J, Huang YY, Li ZS, Chen GS, Qu P, Song HP, Zhang XM: Heat shock protein 70/MAGE-3 fusion protein vaccine can enhance cellular and humoral immune responses to MAGE-3 in vivo. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005, 54 (9): 907-914. 10.1007/s00262-004-0660-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Feder ME, Hofmann GE: Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999, 61: 243-282. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.243.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Udono H, Srivastava PK: Heat shock protein 70-associated peptides elicit specific cancer immunity. J Exp Med. 1993, 178 (4): 1391-1396. 10.1084/jem.178.4.1391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Binder RJ: Heat shock protein vaccines: from bench to bedside. Int Rev Immunol. 2006, 25 (5–6): 353-375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Suzue K, Young RA: Adjuvant-free hsp70 fusion protein system elicits humoral and cellular immune responses to HIV-1 p24. J Immunol. 1996, 156 (2): 873-879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mizukami S, Kajiwara C, Ishikawa H, Katayama I, Yui K, Udono H: Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cell epitopes fused to heat shock cognate protein 70 (hsc70) can function to eradicate tumors. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99 (5): 1008-1015. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00788.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Anthony LS, Wu H, Sweet H, Turnnir C, Boux LJ, Mizzen LA: Priming of CD8+ CTL effector cells in mice by immunization with a stress protein-influenza virus nucleoprotein fusion molecule. Vaccine. 1999, 17 (4): 373-383. 10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00199-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Raska M, Weigl E: Heat shock proteins in autoimmune diseases. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2005, 149: 243-249. 10.5507/bp.2005.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Steinhoff U, Brinkmann V, Klemm U, Aichele P, Seiler P, Brandt U, Bland PW, Prinz I, Zügel U, Kaufmann SH: Autoimmune intestinal pathology induced by hsp60-specific CD8 T cells. Immunity. 1999, 11: 349-358. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80110-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pascolo S, Schirle M, Gückel B, Dumrese T, Stumm S, Kayser S, Moris A, Wallwiener D, Rammensee HG, Stevanovic S: A MAGE-A1 HLA-A A*0201 epitope identified by mass spectrometry. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (10): 4072-4077.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luiten R, van der Bruggen P: A MAGE-A1 peptide is recognized on HLA-B7 human tumors by cytolytic T lymphocytes. Tissue Antigens. 2000, 55 (2): 149-152. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2000.550206.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Luiten RM, Demotte N, Tine J, van der Bruggen P: A MAGE-A1 peptide presented to cytolytic T lymphocytes by both HLA-B35 and HLA-A1 molecules. Tissue Antigens. 2000, 56 (1): 77-81. 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2000.560110.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zwaveling S, Ferreira Mota SC, Nouta J, Johnson M, Lipford GB, Offringa R, van der Burg SH, Melief CJ: Established human papillomavirus type 16-expressing tumors are effectively eradicated following vaccination with long peptides. J Immunol. 2002, 169 (1): 350-358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Atanackovic D, Altorki NK, Cao Y, Ritter E, Ferrara CA, Ritter G, Hoffman EW, Bokemeyer C, Old LJ, Gnjatic S: Booster vaccination of cancer patients with MAGE-A3 protein reveals long-term immunological memory or tolerance depending on priming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (5): 1650-1655. 10.1073/pnas.0707140104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bendz H, Ruhland SC, Pandya MJ, Hainzl O, Riegelsberger S, Braüchle C, Mayer MP, Buchner J, Issels RD, Noessner E: Human heat shock protein 70 enhances tumor antigen presentation through complex formation and intracellular antigen delivery without innate immune signaling. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282 (43): 31688-31702. 10.1074/jbc.M704129200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Li J, Li KN, Gao J, Cui JH, Liu YF, Yang SJ: Heat shock protein 70 fused to or complexed with hantavirus nucleocapsid protein significantly enhances specific humoral and cellular immune responses in C57BL/6 mice. Vaccine. 2008, 26 (25): 3175-3187. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.02.066.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pilon M, Schekman R: Protein translocation: how Hsp70 pulls it off. Cell. 1999, 97 (6): 679-682. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80780-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen RE, Johnson AE: Protein translocation: is Hsp70 pulling my chain?. Curr Biol. 1999, 9 (20): R779-R782. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)80012-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Morimoto RI, Kline MP, Bimston DN, Cotto JJ: The heat-shock response: regulation and function of heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones. Essays Biochem. 1997, 32: 17-29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Binder RJ, Blachere NE, Srivastava PK: Heat shock protein-chaperoned peptides but not free peptides introduced into the cytosol are presented efficiently by major histocompatibility complex I molecules. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (20): 17163-17171. 10.1074/jbc.M011547200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Castellino F, Boucher PE, Eichelberg K, Mayhew M, Rothman JE, Houghton AN, Germain RN: Receptor-mediated uptake of antigen/heat shock protein complexes results in major histocompatibility complex class I antigen presentation via two distinct processing pathways. J Exp Med. 2000, 191 (11): 1957-1964. 10.1084/jem.191.11.1957.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Arnold-Schild D, Hanau D, Spehner D, Schmid C, Rammensee HG, de la Salle H, Schild H: Cutting edge: receptor-mediated endocytosis of heat shock proteins by professional antigen-presenting cells. J Immunol. 1999, 162 (7): 3757-3760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Asea A, Kraeft SK, Kurt-Jones EA, Stevenson MA, Chen LB, Finberg RW, Koo GC, Calderwood SK: HSP70 stimulates cytokine production through a CD14-dependant pathway, demonstrating its dual role as a chaperone and cytokine. Nat Med. 2000, 6 (4): 435-442. 10.1038/74697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Becker T, Hartl FU, Wieland F: CD40, an extracellular receptor for binding and uptake of Hsp70-peptide complexes. J Cell Biol. 2002, 158 (7): 1277-1285. 10.1083/jcb.200208083.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Kelly CG, Karttunen JT, Whittall T, Lehner PJ, Duncan L, MacAry P, Younson JS, Singh M, Oehlmann W, Cheng G, Bergmeier L, Lehner T: CD40 is a cellular receptor mediating mycobacterial heat shock protein 70 stimulation of CC-chemokines. Immunity. 2001, 15 (6): 971-983. 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00242-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Binder RJ, Han DK, Srivastava PK: CD91: a receptor for heat shock protein gp96. Nat Immunol. 2000, 1 (2): 151-155. 10.1038/77835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Basu S, Binder RJ, Ramalingam T, Srivastava PK: CD91 is a common receptor for heat shock proteins gp96, hsp90, hsp70, and calreticulin. Immunity. 2001, 14 (3): 303-313. 10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00111-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fischer N, Haug M, Kwok WW, Kalbacher H, Wernet D, Dannecker GE, Holzer U: Involvement of CD91 and scavenger receptors in Hsp70-facilitated activation of human antigenspecific CD4+ memory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2010, 40 (4): 986-997. 10.1002/eji.200939738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Berwin B, Hart JP, Rice S, Gass C, Pizzo SV, Post SR, Nicchitta CV: Scavenger receptor-A mediates gp96/GRP94 and calreticulin internalization by antigen-presenting cells. EMBO J. 2003, 22 (22): 6127-6136. 10.1093/emboj/cdg572.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Matsutake T, Sawamura T, Srivastava PK: High efficiency CD91- and LOX-1-mediated re-presentation of gp96-chaperoned peptides by MHC II molecules. Cancer Immun. 2010, 10: 7-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Vabulas RM, Braedel S, Hilf N, Singh-Jasuja H, Herter S, Ahmad-Nejad P, Kirschning CJ, Da Costa C, Rammensee HG, Wagner H, Schild H: The endoplasmic reticulum-resident heat shock protein Gp96 activates dendritic cells via the Toll-like receptor 2/4 pathway. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (23): 20847-20853. 10.1074/jbc.M200425200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chen T, Guo J, Han C, Yang M, Cao X: Heat shock protein 70, released from heat-stressed tumor cells, initiates antitumor immunity by inducing tumor cell chemokine production and activating dendritic cells via TLR4 pathway. J Immunol. 2009, 182 (3): 1449-1459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zong J, Peng Q, Wang Q, Zhang T, Fan D, Xu X: Human HSP70 and modified HPV16 E7 fusion DNA vaccine induces enhanced specific CD8+ T cell responses and anti-tumor effects. Oncol Rep. 2009, 22: 953-961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Chen CH, Wang TL, Hung CF, Yang Y, Young RA, Pardoll DM, Wu TC: Enhancement of DNA vaccine potency by linkage of antigen gene to an HSP70 gene. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1035-1042.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. CTDatabase. [http://www.cta.lncc.br/modelo.php?idgene=11%26idmeta=15]
  44. CTDatabase. [http://www.cta.lncc.br/modelo.php?idgene=11%26idmeta=6]
  45. Park JW, Kwon TK, Kim IH, Sohn SS, Kim YS, Kim CI, Bae OS, Lee KS, Lee KD, Lee CS, Chang HK, Choe BK, Ahn SY, Jeon CH: A new strategy for the diagnosis of MAGE-expressing cancers. J Immunol Methods. 2002, 266 (1–2): 79-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Eura M, Ogi K, Chikamatsu K, Lee KD, Nakano K, Masuyama K, Itoh K, Ishikawa T: Expression of the MAGE gene family in human head-and-neck squamous-cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1995, 64 (5): 304-308. 10.1002/ijc.2910640504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Otte M, Zafrakas M, Riethdorf L, Pichlmeier U, Löning T, Jänicke F, Pantel K: MAGE-A gene expression pattern in primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (18): 6682-6687.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jiang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.