Skip to main content
Download PDF

Repurposing lipid-lowering drugs on asthma and lung function: evidence from a genetic association analysis

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 22, Article number: 615 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To explore the correlation between asthma risk and genetic variants affecting the expression or function of lipid-lowering drug targets.

Methods

We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using variants in several genes associated with lipid-lowering medication targets: HMGCR (statin target), PCSK9 (alirocumab target), NPC1L1 (ezetimibe target), APOB (mipomersen target), ANGPTL3 (evinacumab target), PPARA (fenofibrate target), and APOC3 (volanesorsen target), as well as LDLR and LPL. Our objective was to investigate the relationship between lipid-lowering drugs and asthma through MR. Finally, we assessed the efficacy and stability of the MR analysis using the MR Egger and inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods.

Results

The elevated triglyceride (TG) levels associated with the APOC3, and LPL targets were found to increase asthma risk. Conversely, higher LDL-C levels driven by LDLR were found to decrease asthma risk. Additionally, LDL-C levels (driven by APOB, NPC1L1 and HMGCR targets) and TG levels (driven by the LPL target) were associated with improved lung function (FEV1/FVC). LDL-C levels driven by PCSK9 were associated with decreased lung function (FEV1/FVC).

Conclusion

In conclusion, our findings suggest a likely causal relationship between asthma and lipid-lowering drugs. Moreover, there is compelling evidence indicating that lipid-lowering therapies could play a crucial role in the future management of asthma.

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic lung disease characterized by airway inflammation and constriction during attacks. Its typical symptoms include wheezing, chest tightness, and coughing [1]. So far, the incidence of asthma has been attributed to a combination of environmental and genetic factors. However, the specific mechanism of asthma attacks has not yet been fully clarified [2]. Approximately 3 billion people worldwide suffer from asthma, and this number is projected to increase to 10 billion by 2025 [3]. The symptoms of asthma can vary in severity from mild to severe, and some individuals may experience life-threatening symptoms [4]. A significant body of research has demonstrated that persistent wheezing is associated with slower lung function improvement during adolescence [5]. Moreover, individuals with persistent asthma are more likely to experience an increased incidence of other respiratory diseases, such as bacterial pneumonia, which can be induced by an increased nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae [6]. Asthma and its related complications have posed a significant public health challenge, leading to high morbidity and, in severe cases, a high fatality rate [7]. Unfortunately, asthma cannot currently be cured, but it can be effectively managed with current medical care [8]. While asthma cannot be cured, it can be effectively managed with appropriate therapy, allowing individuals to maintain a healthy condition [9]. The traditional treatment for controlling acute asthma attacks involves the use of inhaled glucocorticoids and β-agonists [10]. Some asthma patients benefit from the combination of inhaled glucocorticoids (GC) with inhaled β-agonists. However, several patients are unable to control their condition despite receiving large doses of inhaled GC or even oral GC, a condition known as GC-resistant asthma [11]. Therefore, it is important to explore new drugs for the treatment of asthma.

Although there is increasing technological advancement in drug research, drug repurposing has garnered more attention [12, 13]. Drug repurposing, also known as drug repositioning, involves using existing drugs for new therapeutic purposes [14, 15]. Compared to developing new drugs, drug repurposing offers reduced development time, higher approval rates, and existing safety data [16]. This approach has been employed in many diseases, such as psoriasis [17], COVID-19 [18, 19], HPV-associated cervical cancer [20], endometrial cancer [21], and tubulointerstitial fibrosis [22], among others.

Lipid-lowering drugs comprise a range of medications used to reduce blood cholesterol levels, thereby lowering the risk of heart disease and stroke [23]. The primary types of lipid-lowering drugs include statins, alirocumab, ezetimibe, mipomersen, evinacumab, fenofibrate, acipimox, and volanesorsen [24]. Previous studies have suggested that statins may have therapeutic effects on diseases beyond their lipid-lowering function, such as Alzheimer’s disease [25]. In humans, statins have been shown to reduce the risk of lung cancer [26]. Interestingly, statins and fibrates have been found to reduce host inflammation [27].Moreover, statins have also shown potential in the treatment of asthma [28]. An observational study discovered an association between statin use and fewer hospitalizations for asthma attacks in asthma patients [29]. A double-blind study found that statins improve the anti-inflammatory efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma patients [30]. Another study found that among patients with severe asthma, those who took statins achieved better asthma control [31]. Although the benefits of statins for asthma have been widely reported, less evidence has been shown regarding the role of other lipid-lowering drugs in asthma. Hence, we aimed to explore the association between different lipid-lowering drugs and asthma.

Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a technique for investigating the causal influence of a modifiable exposure on disease using genetic variation in genes [32]. In MR research, genetic variants serve as instrumental variables for the exposure of interest, under the assumption that they are randomly assigned at conception and unaffected by confounding variables [33]. This approach enables researchers to address some of the limitations of conventional observational studies, such as confounding and reverse causality [34]. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample MR analysis in this study to explore the potential causal effect of lipid-lowering drugs on asthma.

Methods

Study design and source of GWAS Summary dataset

In our study, we conducted a two-sample MR analysis focusing on genetic variations located in or near genes encoding the relevant medication targets, as illustrated in Fig. 1 [35]. The lipid traits were extracted from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC, http://lipidgenetics.org/), which included Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC). Additionally, we selected four asthma datasets with the largest sample sizes and three lung function datasets from the GWAS summary database, primarily comprising European populations. The Data Ark provides access to GWAS summary statistics in the GWAS-VCF format, facilitating the efficient storage of genetic variants, annotations, and metadata. The platform includes GWAS datasets from various consortia, such as those imported from the EBI database and those developed for MR-Base. Researchers can access scripts for working with GWAS summary statistics uploaded by Shea Andrews. According to the note in the GWAS database, lung function was defined as the “FEV1/FVC” ratio. This ratio is calculated using spirometry, a technique that analyzes how much air you can forcibly exhale from your lungs. FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) measures the volume of air expelled in a single second, while FVC (forced vital capacity) measures the total amount of air forcibly exhaled in one breath. These datasets are derived from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), which are observational studies of a genome-wide set of genetic variants in different individuals to determine if any variant is associated with a trait. Moreover, we collected a dataset for coronary heart disease (PMID:26,343,387, Population: mixed, cases: 60,801, controls: 123,504) from the IEU website (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/) as a positive control outcome. The detailed information is presented in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic and flowchart progress of lipid-lowering drugs and asthma

Full size image
Table 1 The baseline information of GWAS summary data related to LDL-C, triglyceride, coronary heart disease, asthma and lung function
Full size table

Target identification of lipid-lowering drug and MR analysis

Firstly, we selected several commonly used lipid-lowering drugs for investigation, including statins, alirocumab, ezetimibe, mipomersen, evinacumab, and volanesorsen. Next, we searched the DrugBank (https://go.drugbank.com/) and ChEMBL (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/) websites to identify the targets of these drugs. Following the intersection of these target results, we selected six targets, including HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR, Statins), Subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9, Alirocumab), Niemann-Pick C1-like protein 1 (NPC1L1, Ezetimibe), Apo-B 100 mRNA (APOB, Mipomersen), Angiopoietin-related protein 3 (ANGPTL3, Evinacumab), and Apolipoprotein C-III mRNA 3’UTR (APOC3, Volanesorsen).The low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) is a key protein that regulates cholesterol levels in the body [36]. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) is a crucial enzyme in lipid metabolism and transport [37]. Therefore, two essential targets, LDLR and LPL, were included in our study. Further details are shown in Table 2.

Lipid-lowering drugs play a crucial role in managing cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) [38]. Therefore, to enhance the credibility of the targets, we considered CHD as a positive control to validate the targets. If the targets were validated, they could undergo further analysis. To determine if lipid-lowering drugs had a causal impact on asthma, we employed several methods, including the inverse variance weighted (IVW) technique, the MR Egger method, the weighted median method, and the weighted mode method. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variations (IV) from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data to be used as a genetic tool in MR research. Additionally, the IVs had to meet the following criteria: (1) they were highly correlated with the exposure, (2) they were not associated with confounders, and (3) they affected outcomes only through the exposure. SNPs were selected based on the conditions of P < 5e-8, r2 < 0.001, and kb = 100.

Table 2 Target gene information of lowering-lipid drugs derived from different drug-gene interaction databases
Full size table

Sensitivity analysis

We utilized the MR Egger and inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods to assess the effectiveness and stability of the MR analysis between exposures and outcomes. A P-value of 0.05 indicates strong heterogeneity in results from different populations, which can be demonstrated by the heterogeneity I2 using a percentage description. Subsequently, the MR analysis was rerun after removing outlier SNPs. Finally, to illustrate the trend and stability of the data, four plots were created: a scatter plot, a forest plot, the leave-one-out test, and a funnel plot. A scatter plot illustrates how single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) influence exposure and outcome variables, helping visualize the relationship between genetic variations and exposure and outcomes of interest. It shows how changes in the exposure variable correspond to changes in the outcome variable based on genetic data. A forest plot is used to display the results of MR analysis, especially when examining the effects of multiple exposures on a single outcome, or vice versa. It allows for a visual comparison of effect sizes and confidence intervals among different exposures or outcomes, aiding in the identification of significant associations and providing a clear summary of the MR results. The leave-one-out plot is used for sensitivity analysis, systematically removing one SNP at a time from the MR analysis to assess the robustness of the results. By observing how each SNP influences the overall causal estimate, researchers can evaluate the impact of specific genetic variants on the MR analysis. A funnel plot is employed to assess asymmetry in MR analysis, which can indicate potential biases or reliability issues. It helps identify publication bias, small-study effects, and other sources of bias in MR studies. Funnel plots can suggest an overrepresentation of small studies with significant results, highlighting potential weaknesses in the MR analysis. R software and associated R packages were used for all MR analyses. All the MR analyses were performed using the Two Sample MR (version 0.5.10), Mendelian Randomization (version 0.8.0), and MRPRESSO package (1.0) in R Software 4.3.2 (https://www.R-project.org). The meta-analysis was performed using the meta package. All the used R package could be found on the website (cran.r-project.org/web/), and also, these package, GWAS summary data, along with the code could be acquired from authors with request.

Results

Positive control MR analysis

Before conducting the MR analysis between lipid-lowering therapy and asthma, a positive control MR analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of lipid-lowering drugs on coronary heart disease (CHD), a well-established fact. This analysis aimed to verify whether lipid-lowering drugs were indeed effective in treating CHD. The results of the MR analysis on different lipid-lowering drugs and their impact on CHD are summarized in Table 3; Fig. 2. The analysis showed that genetic variants associated with increased LDL levels, driven by the APOB, HMGCR, NPC1L1, and PCSK9 genes, were associated with an increased risk of CHD (APOB: OR = 1.243, 95%CI: 1.106, 1.397; HMGCR: OR = 1.444, 95%CI: 1.240, 1.682; NPC1L1: OR = 1.655, 95%CI: 1.201, 2.281; PCSK9: OR = 1.523, 95%CI: 1.303, 1.779). Similarly, an increased risk of CHD was observed with exposure to drugs targeting APOC3 (OR = 1.242, 95%CI: 1.115, 1.384). Furthermore, genetic variants associated with LDLR (OR = 1.820, 95%CI: 1.571, 2.108) and LPL (OR = 1.534, 95%CI: 1.399, 1.681) were also associated with an increased risk of CHD. The sensitivity analysis of the MR analysis between lowering-LDL and lowering-TG drugs with CHD showed no significant heterogeneity for the HMGCR, PCSK9, NPC1L1, ANGPTL3, and LDLR targets (Table S1).

Table 3 The MR analysis of the effect of different lowering LDL-cholesterol and lowering triglyceride on coronary heart disease
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The forest plot for the lipid-lowering target with coronary heart disease (CHD). (CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.)

Full size image

The effect of different lipid-lowering drugs on asthma and lung function (FEV1/FVC)

As indicated in Table 2, seven targets were initially considered for analysis: HMGCR, PCSK9, NPC1L1, APOB, ANGPTL3, PPARA, and APOC3. Additionally, due to their significance in lipid metabolism control, LDLR and LPL targets were also examined. Initially, coronary heart disease was used as a positive control outcome to assess the effectiveness of this approach, with the analysis results depicted in Fig. 1. Based on these validated targets, further analysis was conducted. Subsequently, as shown in Fig. 3, an elevated TG level driven by the APOC3 target was found to increase the risk of asthma (OR = 1.0086, 95%CI: 1.0037–1.0135). Similarly, an increased TG level driven by LPL was associated with an increased risk of asthma (LPL: OR = 1.0040, 95%CI: 1.0001–1.0078). However, an elevated LDL-C level driven by LDLR was found to decrease the risk of asthma (LDLR: OR = 0.9930, 95%CI: 0.9874–0.9987). Furthermore, lung function(FEV1/FVC), as depicted in Fig. 4, showed that an increased LDL-C level driven by the APOB, HMGCR, and NPC1L1 targets led to improve lung function (FEV1/FVC) (APOB: beta=-0.0219, 95%CI: -0.0329, -0.0110; HMGCR: beta=-0.0434, 95%CI: -0.0692, -0.0175; NPC1L1: beta=-0.0361, 95%CI: -0.0481, -0.0242). Similarly, an increased TG level driven by the LPL target was associated with a decrease in lung function (FEV1/FVC) (beta=-0.0361, 95%CI: -0.0481, -0.0242).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The casual effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on asthma risk was detected using the mendelian randomization method and the meta-analysis method was used to pool the MR analysis results of each lowering therapy. (Square: each OR value; Rhomboid: the pooled OR value of fixed effect model; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The causal effect of different lipid-lowering therapies on FEV1/FVC risk was detected using the mendelian randomization method, and the meta-analysis method was used to pool the mendelian randomization analysis results of each lowering therapy. (Square symbols: each beta value, Rhomboid symbols: the pooled beta value of the fixed-effect model. CI: confidence interval.)

Full size image

Sensitivity analyses

The sensitivity analysis for the MR analysis was conducted using the MR Egger and inverse variance weighted (IVW) methods, demonstrating the robustness and low heterogeneity of the MR analysis results (Supplementary Tables 15 and Supplementary Table 16). Additionally, the scatter plot, forest plot, leave-one-out plot, and funnel plot illustrated the stability of the MR analysis results (Supplementary Figs. 1–8). The scatter plot illustrates the relationship between the exposure variable (lipid-lowering medicines) and the outcome variable (asthma or FEV1/FVC) using instrumental variables (Supplementary Fig. 1.5). The forest plot graphically depicts the effect estimates and confidence intervals for each SNP (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 6). Furthermore, the leave-one-out analysis revealed that no single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) had a substantial effect on the causal inference (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 7). This suggests that the overall causal link identified between lipid-lowering medicines and a lower risk of asthma or FEV1/FVC was not influenced by any single SNP, underscoring the robustness of the findings. Additionally, the funnel plot and the MR Egger regression test showed no indication of asymmetry, indicating the absence of directional horizontal pleiotropy (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 8).

Discussion

Our study is the first to investigate the causal association between asthma and lipid-lowering drugs using MR. The MR analysis provided compelling evidence for a positive association of APOC3 (OR = 1.0086, 95% CI = 1.0037–1.0135) and LPL (OR = 1.0040, 95% CI = 1.0001–1.0078) with asthma risk, and a negative association of LDLR (OR = 0.9930, 95% CI = 0.9874–0.9987) with asthma risk. Additionally, in terms of lung function, an increased LDL-C level driven by the APOB, HMGCR, and NPC1L1 targets resulted in a reduction in lung function (FEV1/FVC) (APOB: beta = -0.0219, 95% CI: -0.0329, -0.0110; HMGCR: beta = -0.0434, 95% CI: -0.0692, -0.0175; NPC1L1: beta = -0.0361, 95% CI: -0.0481, -0.0242), while an increased TG level driven by the LPL target also led to a reduction in lung function (FEV1/FVC) (beta = -0.0361, 95% CI: -0.0481, -0.0242). These findings suggest that lipid-lowering drugs may have a significant role in the future treatment of asthma.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases affecting both children and adults, characterized by complex gene-environment interactions [39]. It is characterized by recurrent airway obstruction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, with symptoms such as wheezing, coughing, chest tightness, and shortness of breath [2].Almost 200,000 Americans and over 30 billion people globally suffer with asthma [40]. Asthma affects nearly 200,000 Americans and over 30 billion people globally [40], with an estimated 2.5 million deaths attributed to asthma each year [41]. Patients with severe asthma, in particular, face greater challenges as traditional drugs may not be effective [42]. Therefore, the development of new asthma treatments is crucial. However, traditional drug discovery methods typically take 12–17 years and cost $2–3 billion to bring a new drug to market [43]. These methods also have a high risk of failure due to the complexity and uncertainty of developing new compounds [44]. Consequently, there is growing interest in drug repurposing, which explores the potential of existing drugs for treating new diseases. Drug repurposing offers advantages such as shorter development timelines, higher approval rates, and lower overall development costs compared to traditional drug discovery methods [45].

The relationship between asthma and lipid metabolism has been extensively researched. Asthmatic patients often exhibit significantly higher levels of sputum LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4 than healthy individuals [46]. A meta-analysis has shown that patients with asthma tend to have higher LDL and total serum cholesterol levels compared to non-asthmatic individuals [47]. Similarly, higher TG/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratios are associated with a higher prevalence of asthma [48]. Research suggests that low blood high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in children are linked to an increased risk of asthma in adolescence [49]. Moreover, high triglyceride levels have been linked to elevated levels of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and aeroallergen sensitivity in 7-year-old children [50]. Given the close association between lipid metabolism and asthma, various drugs targeting the lipid pathway have been developed, which have shown potential in relieving asthma symptoms [51]. However, these new drugs are either expensive or have not yet been proven safe. Lipid-lowering drugs are medications designed to decrease blood cholesterol levels [38]. Statins, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, Mipomersen, Evinacumab, Fenofibrate, Acipimox, and Volanesorsen are among the most common lipid-lowering drugs. Therefore, we aim to investigate the relationship between these lipid-lowering drugs and asthma using MR analysis.

Consistent with previous studies, we found that an increased TG level driven by the APOC3(OR = 1.0086, 95%CI: 1.0037–1.0135) and LPL (OR = 1.0040, 95%CI: 1.0001–1.0078) target were associated with an increased risk of asthma. Several studies have found an association between elevated serum triglyceride levels and the presence of asthma, particularly in patients with obesity [52, 53]. Furthermore, a study reported that serum TGs were significantly higher in patients with asthma, even after adjusting for factors such as BMI, blood eosinophils, and statin use [52].Volanesorsen is a novel antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of APOC3 mRNA developed for the treatment of familial chylomicronemia syndrome [54, 55]. However, although the MR analysis indicated that the Volanesorsen showed statistically significant effect in asthma risk, the effective OR of this drug was 1.0026, which is so small that it may not manifest significant effect in clinical application. This finding may indicate a potential clinical advice that Volanesorsen may be a preferential choice for lowering-lipids treatment for patients with asthma risk or history of asthma. In addition, the real effect of this target in the asthma risk need further experiment demonstration, and our finding could be only identified as a pioneer study.

However, contrary to previous studies, we also observed that an increased LDL-C level driven by LDLR led to a decreased risk of asthma (LDLR: OR = 0.9930, 95%CI: 0.9874–0.9987). Some studies found that asthma was more prevalent in the high-risk groups for elevated LDL cholesterol, suggesting an association between higher LDL levels and increased asthma risk [48].However, LDL-C is not a homogeneous particle, which consists of several distinct subclasses that vary in size, density, and atherogenic potential. Nicola et al. reported that LDL-1 levels were comparable between the asthma group and the healthy subjects’ group (56 ± 16% vs. 53 ± 11, p = NS), whereas LDL-2 was significantly lower in asthmatics compared to controls (35 ± 8% vs. 43 ± 10%, p = 0.0074) [56].Research suggests that LDLR plays a role in asthma by negatively regulating airway hyperreactivity and goblet cell hyperplasia through an apo E-LDLR pathway, which acts as a natural negative regulator of these asthma-related processes [57]. Activation of this pathway, potentially through apo E mimetic peptides, could offer a novel treatment approach for asthma patients. Moreover, LDLR has been associated with suppressing IgE production and the expression of Th2 and Th17 cytokines in asthma models [58]. These findings underscore the potential therapeutic implications of targeting the apo E-LDLR pathway in managing asthma symptoms and inflammation.

Furthermore, we found that an increased LDL-C level driven by the APOB, HMGCR, NPC1L1 target resulted in a reduction in lung function (FEV1/FVC) (APOB: beta=-0.0219, 95%CI: -0.0329, -0.0110; HMGCR: beta=-0.0434, 95%CI: -0.0692, -0.0175; NPC1L1: beta=-0.0361, 95%CI: -0.0481, -0.0242). Statins, which are considered the first-line treatment for high cholesterol, work by blocking the HMG CoA reductase enzyme [59]. Due to their various impacts on the inflammatory process, statins may have potential therapeutic benefits for asthma treatment [60]. According to Amir et al., statins have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, anti-remodeling, and immunomodulatory properties that may benefit asthma patients by enhancing lung function and reducing airway hyper-reactivity [61]. Rosuvastatin treatment has been shown to improve lung pathology by suppressing cytokine production mediated by Th2 and Th17 cells [62].Furthermore, rosuvastatin also affects airway hyperresponsiveness, lung inflammation, and oxidative stress [63]. Research has shown that rosuvastatin can alleviate airway inflammation and oxidation by affecting NOS and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory cells [64]. Studies have shown that simvastatin can decrease the levels of IL-4 and IL-5 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [65].Simvastatin prevented airway remodeling in asthma at an early stage [66]. Moreover, there is scant direct data from earlier studies regarding the connection between ezetimibe and mipomersen with asthma. According to our findings, APOB mipomersen, statins, and ezetimibe show great potential for improving lung function. Additionally, Haldar et al. describe a novel subset of patients with “obesity asthma.” These patients exhibit distinct clinical characteristics, such as late-onset asthma, severe symptoms, and poor response to inhaled corticosteroids, among others [67]. Similarly, the study discovered that obese asthmatics had a higher risk of hospitalization than lean asthmatics [68]. Hence, we believe that these lipid-lowering drugs may benefit obese asthmatic patients. Lipid-lowering drugs show great potential in treating obese asthmatic patients. However, further experimental investigation will be necessary to assess their specific efficacy in the future.

Our study has several strengths. Firstly, it is the first MR study to investigate the relationship between lipid-lowering medications and asthma. Secondly, MR can help mitigate limitations inherent in traditional observational studies, such as reverse causality and confounding, thus enhancing the robustness of our findings. Additionally, we used four of the largest asthma databases for our meta-analysis, which increased the reliability of our conclusions due to the large sample size. Furthermore, we employed appropriate effect models based on heterogeneity, using the “random effects” model for strong heterogeneity and the “fixed effects” model otherwise. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis to ensure the validity of our results. However, there are several limitations to our study. Firstly, our study was limited to a European population due to data restrictions in GWAS, which limits the generalizability of our findings to other populations. Secondly, due to the application limitation of MR analysis, the MR analysis cannot assess the effects of long-term exposure to lipid-lowering drugs or the effects of each subtype of drug. Thirdly, we were unable to explore dose-response relationships between these drugs and asthma. Cell and animal experiments, as well as prospective clinical studies, are necessary to investigate these aspects further in future. Furthermore, our study only looked at how individual drugs affect asthma, and the effects of combining different lipid-lowering drugs need to be investigated. Finally, aside from MR, multi-omic-based and network-based approaches are common methods used to explore new indications for existing drugs in an orderly manner [69]. Hence, we hope to employ multi-omic-based and network-based approaches in the future to investigate the relationship between lipid-lowering drugs and asthma, aiming to enhance the reliability and robustness of our results. In conclusion, our study provides evidence supporting a potential causal relationship between asthma and lipid-lowering drugs. The findings suggest that lipid-lowering drugs may have a significant impact on reducing asthma symptoms, indicating that lipid-lowering therapies could be crucial in the future management of asthma.

Conclusion

In this study, we found that TG levels driven by the APOC3, and LPL targets were associated with an increased risk of asthma. However, we also found that LDL-C levels driven by the LDLR target were associated with a decreased risk of asthma. Additionally, LDL-C levels (driven by APOB, NPC1L1 and HMGCR targets) and TG levels (driven by the LPL target) were associated with improved lung function (FEV1/FVC). LDL-C levels driven by PCSK9 were associated with decreased lung function (FEV1/FVC). These findings underscore the potential importance of lipid-lowering therapies in the future management of asthma. However, further clinical trials are needed to confirm the effects of lipid-lowering medications on asthma. Additionally, further experimental research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Data availability

The lipid traits were extracted from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC, http://lipidgenetics.org/), including LDL-C, TG and TC. Furthermore, we chose four asthma datasets with the biggest sample sizes and three lung function datasets, with most the dataset’s population being Europeans. Moreover, we collected a coronary heart disease dataset (PMID:26343387, Population: mixed, case:60,801, control:123,504) from the IEU website (https://gwas.mrcieu.ac.uk/) as a positive control outcome.

Abbreviations

HMGCR:

HMG-CoA reductase

PCSK9:

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9

NPC1L1:

NPC1 Like Intracellular Cholesterol Transporter 1

APOB:

Apolipoprotein B

ANGPTL3:

Angiopoietin Like 3

PPARA:

Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptor Alpha

APOC3:

Apolipoprotein C3

LDLR:

Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor

LPL:

Lipoprotein Lipase

MR:

Mendelian randomization

IVW:

Inverse variance weighted

TG:

Triglyceride

GLGC:

The Global Lipids Genetics Consortium

SNPs:

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

IV:

Instrumental variations

CHD:

Coronary heart disease

TyG:

Triglyceride-glucose index

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

References

  1. Sockrider M, Fussner L. What is asthma? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(9):P25–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mims JW. Asthma: definitions and pathophysiology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(Suppl 1):S2–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dharmage SC, Perret JL, Custovic A. Epidemiology of asthma in children and adults. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemanske RF Jr., Busse WW. Asthma Jama. 1997;278(22):1855–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lodge CJ, et al. Childhood wheeze phenotypes show less than expected growth in FEV1 across adolescence. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189(11):1351–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaidi SR, Blakey JD. Why are people with asthma susceptible to pneumonia? A review of factors related to upper airway bacteria. Respirology. 2019;24(5):423–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeatts K, et al. A brief targeted review of susceptibility factors, environmental exposures, asthma incidence, and recommendations for future asthma incidence research. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(4):634–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Castillo JR, Peters SP, Busse WW. Asthma exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and treatment. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(4):918–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gans MD, Gavrilova T. Understanding the immunology of asthma: pathophysiology, biomarkers, and treatments for asthma endotypes. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;36:118–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lommatzsch M, Virchow JC. Severe asthma: definition, diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111(50):847–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Caramori G, et al. Corticosteroid resistance in asthma: Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Mol Aspects Med. 2022;85:100969.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Samantasinghar A, et al. A comprehensive review of key factors affecting the efficacy of antibody drug conjugate. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;161:114408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Asif A, et al. Microphysiological system with continuous analysis of albumin for hepatotoxicity modeling and drug screening. J Ind Eng Chem. 2021;98:318–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed F, et al. A systematic review of computational approaches to understand cancer biology for informed drug repurposing. J Biomed Inform. 2023;142:104373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmed F, et al. Drug repurposing for viral cancers: a paradigm of machine learning, deep learning, and virtual screening-based approaches. J Med Virol. 2023;95(4):e28693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kort E, Jovinge S. Drug Repurposing: claiming the full benefit from Drug Development. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021;23(6):62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmed F, et al. Drug repurposing in psoriasis, performed by reversal of disease-associated gene expression profiles. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2022;20:6097–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed F, et al. A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence and network based approaches to drug repurposing in Covid-19. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;153:113350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed F, et al. SperoPredictor: an Integrated Machine Learning and Molecular Docking-based drug Repurposing Framework with Use Case of COVID-19. Front Public Health. 2022;10:902123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed F, et al. Network-based drug repurposing for HPV-associated cervical cancer. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:5186–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ahmed F et al. Network-based drug repurposing identifies small molecule drugs as immune checkpoint inhibitors for endometrial cancer. Mol Divers, 2024.

  22. Samantasinghar A, et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted repurposing of lubiprostone alleviates tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Transl Res. 2023;262:75–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Okopień B, Bułdak Ł, Bołdys A. Current and future trends in the lipid lowering therapy. Pharmacol Rep. 2016;68(4):737–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LaRosa JC. Combinations of drugs in lipid-lowering therapy. Am J Med. 1994;96(5):399–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams DM, et al. Lipid lowering and Alzheimer disease risk: a mendelian randomization study. Ann Neurol. 2020;87(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khurana V, et al. Statins reduce the risk of lung cancer in humans: a large case-control study of US veterans. Chest. 2007;131(5):1282–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Joshi R, Venkatesan S, Myles PR. A UK general practice population cohort study investigating the association between lipid lowering drugs and 30-day mortality following medically attended acute respiratory illness. PeerJ. 2016;4:pe1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fessler MB. Regulation of adaptive immunity in health and disease by cholesterol metabolism. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15(8):48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang CC, et al. Statin use in patients with asthma: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2011;41(5):507–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maneechotesuwan K, et al. Statins enhance the anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients through increased induction of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(4):754–e7621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeki AA et al. Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma. BMJ Open, 2013. 3(8).

  32. Sekula P, et al. Mendelian randomization as an Approach to assess causality using Observational Data. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3253–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(5):377–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Bowden J, Holmes MV. Meta-analysis and mendelian randomization: a review. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(4):486–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Swerdlow DI, et al. Selecting instruments for mendelian randomization in the wake of genome-wide association studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(5):1600–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeon H, Blacklow SC. Structure and physiologic function of the low-density lipoprotein receptor. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:535–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mead JR, Irvine SA, Ramji DP. Lipoprotein lipase: structure, function, regulation, and role in disease. J Mol Med (Berl). 2002;80(12):753–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pahan K. Lipid-lowering drugs. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63(10):1165–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Papi A, et al. Asthma Lancet. 2018;391(10122):783–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaur R, Chupp G. Phenotypes and endotypes of adult asthma: moving toward precision medicine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(1):1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olin JT, Wechsler ME. Asthma: pathogenesis and novel drugs for treatment. BMJ. 2014;349:g5517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chung KF, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(2):343–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hua Y, et al. Drug repositioning: Progress and challenges in drug discovery for various diseases. Eur J Med Chem. 2022;234:114239.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Talevi A, Bellera CL. Challenges and opportunities with drug repurposing: finding strategies to find alternative uses of therapeutics. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2020;15(4):397–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Roessler HI, et al. Drug Repurposing for Rare diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2021;42(4):255–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pavord ID, et al. Induced sputum eicosanoid concentrations in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(6):1905–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Su X, et al. Association between lipid profile and the prevalence of asthma: a meta-analysis and systemic review. Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(3):423–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ko SH, et al. Lipid profiles in adolescents with and without asthma: Korea National Health and nutrition examination survey data. Lipids Health Dis. 2018;17(1):158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yiallouros PK, et al. Low serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in childhood is associated with adolescent asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42(3):423–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vinding RK, et al. Blood lipid levels associate with childhood asthma, airway obstruction, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and aeroallergen sensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(1):68–e744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang B, et al. Metabolism pathways of arachidonic acids: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. van Zelst CM, et al. Association between elevated serum triglycerides and asthma in patients with obesity: an explorative study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021;42(3):e71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Götz AA, et al. Comparison of particle-exposure triggered pulmonary and systemic inflammation in mice fed with three different diets. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2011;8:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Paik J, Duggan S. Volanesorsen: First Global approval. Drugs. 2019;79(12):1349–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Witztum JL, et al. Volanesorsen and triglyceride levels in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(6):531–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Scichilone N, et al. Serum low density lipoprotein subclasses in asthma. Respir Med. 2013;107(12):1866–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mishra A, et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 attenuates house dust mite-induced eosinophilic airway inflammation by suppressing dendritic cell-mediated adaptive immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(4):1066–e10796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yao X, et al. Apolipoprotein E negatively regulates house dust mite-induced asthma via a low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated pathway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(10):1228–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Sirtori CR. The pharmacology of statins. Pharmacol Res. 2014;88:3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. So JY, et al. Statins in the treatment of COPD and Asthma-where do we stand? Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018;40:26–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zeki AA, et al. Statin use and asthma control in patients with severe asthma. BMJ Open. 2013;3(8):e003314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Saadat S, et al. Rosuvastatin suppresses cytokine production and lung inflammation in asthmatic, hyperlipidemic and asthmatic-hyperlipidemic rat models. Cytokine. 2020;128:154993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Saadat S, et al. Rosuvastatin affects Tracheal responsiveness, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Inflammatory Cells, and oxidative stress markers in Hyperlipidemic and asthmatic rats. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;18(6):624–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Saadat S, Boskabady MH. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Rosuvastatin on Asthmatic, Hyperlipidemic, and asthmatic-hyperlipidemic rat models. Inflammation. 2021;44(6):2279–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McKay A, et al. A novel anti-inflammatory role of simvastatin in a murine model of allergic asthma. J Immunol. 2004;172(5):2903–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zeki AA, et al. Simvastatin inhibits goblet cell hyperplasia and lung arginase in a mouse model of allergic asthma: a novel treatment for airway remodeling? Transl Res. 2010;156(6):335–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Haldar P, et al. Cluster analysis and clinical asthma phenotypes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(3):218–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wenzel SE, Busse WW. Severe asthma: lessons from the Severe Asthma Research Program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;119(1):14–21. quiz 22 – 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wang L, et al. The landscape of the methodology in drug repurposing using human genomic data: a systematic review. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25(2):bbad527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work is financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 82170019), the Fundamental. Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2023ZZTS0897) and Degree & Postgraduate Education Reform Project of Central South University(2023JGB116).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yue Zhang and Zichao Jiang have contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, 410008, China

    Yue Zhang, Lingli Chen & Xiangrong Zheng

  2. Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Hunan, 410008, China

    Zichao Jiang & Ting Lei

Authors
  1. Yue Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zichao Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lingli Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ting Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiangrong Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X. Z. designed the study. Y.Z. and Z.J analyzed the data and generated the figures. L.C. wrote the manuscript. T.L. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lingli Chen, Ting Lei or Xiangrong Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., Chen, L. et al. Repurposing lipid-lowering drugs on asthma and lung function: evidence from a genetic association analysis. J Transl Med 22, 615 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05359-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-024-05359-5

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us