Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparison of clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts undergoing preimplantation genetic testing

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 20, Article number: 545 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of blastocyst which undergo the preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and D6. In addition, the effect of blastocyst grade on clinical and neonatal outcomes was also investigated in this study.

Methods

The pregnancy and miscarriage rates of 1130 cycles of frozen embryo transfer, including 784 D5 frozen embryos and 346 D6 frozen embryos in the Reproductive Hospital of Shandong University from January to December 2020 were analyzed. Gardner blastocyst scoring was used for blastocyst evaluation.

Results

The pregnancy rate of D5 blastocyst was significantly higher, whereas the miscarriage rate of D5 blastocyst was lower, than that of D6 blastocyst tissue biopsy. No significant difference was observed in birth weight and low birth weight of D5 blastocyst and D6 blastocyst, preterm birth, gestational age, and neonatal sex. Frozen-thawed D5 blastocysts have higher pregnancy success rates and lower miscarriage rates compared to D6 blastocysts.

Conclusion

Therefore, both blastocyst grade and embryo biopsy date must be considered when transferring frozen embryos.

Introduction

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is an important step in the process of assisted reproduction that affects pregnancy outcomes [1]. PGT has been employed as an embryo selection tool for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) to ensure higher implantation rates or at least shorter gestational times [2]. PGT is an organic combination of assisted reproductive technology and modern molecular genetic diagnosis technology, and is an important part of preventive medicine [3]. Compared with prenatal diagnosis, the superiority of PGT lies in the screening and diagnosis of preimplantation embryos and the realization of eugenics from the source of pregnancy [1]. The vitrification technique post-PGT greatly shortens the operation time and reduces the physical damage to the blastocyst by trophoblast sampling during the PGT [4]. However, the impact of PGT sampling at different developmental times of blastocysts on embryonic developmental outcomes remains unclear.

With the wide application of blastocyst culture and blastocyst vitrification freeze-thaw technology in the field of reproductive medicine, the proportion of frozen-thawed embryo transfer after whole embryo freezing has increased significantly [5]. Frozen embryo transfer technology can reduce maternal discomfort to freshly transferred embryos and improve the synchrony between embryos and endometrium under the stress of promoting ovulation [6]. It has been reported that patients with high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, endometrial abnormalities, hyper-progesterone, and systemic diseases who are not candidates for fresh transfer have a significantly reduced risk of frozen embryo transfer [7]. It has also been reported that clinical pregnancy outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer are better than those with fresh-cycle transfer [8].

The developmental days and quality of embryos are the key factors to determine whether frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer can lead to clinical pregnancy [9]. Due to hormonal priming of endometrial receptivity, programmed thawed blastocyst transfer cycles should have the same clinical outcome when 5th day (D5) or 6th day (D6) blastocysts are transferred for better endometrial-embryo synchronization [10]. However, PGT requires freeze-thaw sampling of frozen blastocysts prior to embryo transfer [11]. Therefore, trophoblast biopsies for D5 frozen-thawed blastocysts and D6 frozen-thawed blastocysts may have different effects on embryo implantation and development [12].

We compared the clinical outcomes of blastocyst transplantation post PGT at frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 in this study. This study aims to provide theoretical support for the establishment of a standardized operation procedure for frozen-thawed blastocyst sampling in PGT to enhance the clinical pregnancy outcomes to the greatest extent.

Methods

Study design

This study conducted research statistics on all patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer in the Reproductive Hospital of Shandong University from January to December 2020. There were 1130 cycles of frozen embryo transfer, including 784 D5 frozen embryos and 346 D6 frozen embryos. In frozen embryo transfer, COOK reagent was used to thaw embryos, and all embryos were thawed and cultured for 4.5–5.5 h before transplantation. The study was approved by Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University.

Study subjects

Inclusion criteria: aged between 18 and 45; infertility due to pelvic tubal factors or male factors; signed informed consent; requesting third-generation IVF and PGT due to a variety of reasons, such as multiple recurrent miscarriages, a family history of the disease, Chromosome abnormality, or the presence of a single-gene disease in one of their parents.

Acquisition and culture of blastocysts

The ovulation induction protocols adopted include long-term protocol, short-term protocol, antagonist protocol, and micro-stimulation protocol. The oocytes were retrieved 36 h after the injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and the obtained oocytes were placed in the fertilization medium. The semen was collected by masturbation or puncture, and the semen was processed by gradient centrifugation. All patients underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 39–41 h after injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), and then the fertilized eggs were transferred to the cleavage stage medium and cultured in a 37 Â°C incubator with 6% CO2. 16–20 h after insemination, the formation of pronuclei was observed, and abnormal fertilization embryos were picked out, and the rest were cultured for 48 h. Embryos on the third day were observed, and the quality of cleavage stage embryos was evaluated. Embryos were transferred to blastocyst stage medium and cultured to D5 or D6 blastocysts.

Blastocyst scoring

The blastocysts were scored by Gardner blastocyst scoring method, and those with D5 score ≥ 4AA, 4AB, 4BA, 4BB or D6 score ≥ 4AA, 4AB, 4BA, 4BB were determined as high-quality blastocysts.

Vitrification of blastocysts

The blastocysts were laser drilled using Hamilton software. The blastocyst inner cell mass should be avoided when laser drilling. The blastocyst shrank about 5 min after the blasting fluid flowed out. The blastocysts were transferred to the equilibration solution for 2 min at 37 Â°C temperature. Blastocysts were transferred to vitrification solution for no more than 30 s. Blastocysts were placed on labeled cryo-carriers and quickly immersed in liquid nitrogen for preservation.

Blastocyst thawing

The whole process of embryo thawing was performed at 37 °C using Cook Thawing Solution. Frozen carrier rods were immersed in thawing solution for no more than 2 min. Embryos were quickly moved to Wash Buffer for 3 min and then move to Base fluid for 5 min. Finally, the embryos were transferred to blastocyst medium and cultured at 37 Â°C in a plate incubator. The blastocyst survival was observed after 2 h of recovery.

Blastocyst transfer

Endometrial preparation for blastocyst transfer is divided into natural cycle preparation and artificial cycle preparation. All frozen embryo cycle preparation protocols were treated with our center’s routine protocol. The patient’s embryos were thawed and transplanted 4–5 h later. All procedures were performed by the same doctor on the same day. At the time of embryo transfer, the recovery of embryo was observed by laboratory experimenter and the time of culture was recorded.

Post-embryo transfer management and pregnancy outcome judgment

The patient was discharged after 40 min of supine rest, and continued luteal support therapy under the guidance of the doctor. Biochemical pregnancy: 12 days after transplantation, the blood was positive for hCG; clinical pregnancy: 30 days after transplantation, the number of gestational sacs in the uterine cavity and the presence or absence of cardiac pulsation were examined by vaginal B-ultrasound. Clinical pregnancy rate = number of clinical pregnancy cycles/number of transplant cycles ⨯ 100%; embryo implantation rate = number of gestational sacs detected under B-ultrasound/number of blastocysts transferred ⨯ 100%; ectopic pregnancy rate = number of ectopic pregnancy cycles/The number of clinical pregnancy cycles × 100%; the rate of monozygotic twins = the number of monozygotic twin pregnancy cycles/the number of clinical pregnancy cycles × 100%.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by SPSS 16.0 statistical software. Normally distributed measurement data was expressed as x ± s. independent samples t test was used for comparison between groups, and F test was used for comparison between multiple groups. Count data was expressed as %. The χ test was used for comparison between groups. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of patients received blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 in the study

The characteristics of patients received blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 in the study were shown in Table 1. A total of 1130 frozen embryos were transferred, including 784 frozen embryos from D5 and 346 frozen embryos from D6. The rate of obtaining high-quality blastocysts in the D5 group was higher than that in the D6 group. The proportion of partial hatching and complete hatching in the D5 group was higher than that in the D6 group.

Table 1 Characteristics of patients received blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 in the study
Full size table

Blastocysts from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6

Representative images of blastocysts from frozen-thawed D5 (Fig. 1A) and frozen-thawed D6 (Fig. 1B) were shown in Fig. 1 and Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Compared with D6 blastocysts, D5 blastocysts have smaller blastocoel cavity, fewer trophoblast cells, and larger overall cell size than D6 blastocysts. D5 trophoblast cells were more likely to rupture when aspirated, and the number and integrity of cells obtained at biopsy were worse than D6. The blastocysts images recorded at the time of biopsy were shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative images of blastocysts from frozen-thawed D5 (A) and frozen-thawed D6 (B)

Full size image

The pregnancy ratio and abortion ratio between patients received blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6

The outcomes of frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 blastocysts transplantation were further analyzed. As shown in Fig. 2A, the pregnancy rate of D6 blastocyst transfer was remarkably lower than that of D5 group. Consistently, the abortion rate of D5 blastocyst transfer was significantly lower than that of D6 group (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A) and abortion ratio (B) between patients received blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6. Fisher’s exact test

Full size image

The pregnancy ratio and abortion ratio between patients received different quality of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6

The effects of different quality blastocysts D5 and D6 on miscarriage rate and post-transfer pregnancy rate were further investigated. We found that D5 high-quality blastocysts exhibited an enhanced pregnancy rate than D6 high-quality blastocysts, whereas the abortion rate between D5 high-quality blastocysts and D6 high-quality blastocysts were not significant difference (Fig. 3A, D). However, there were no differences in pregnancy and miscarriage rates between D5 normal quality blastocysts and D6 high quality blastocysts (Fig. 3B, E). Likewise, there were no differences in pregnancy and miscarriage rates between D5 average quality blastocysts and D6 average quality blastocysts (Fig. 3C, F). D5 high quality blastocyst transfer can improve pregnancy rate (Additional file 1: Fig. S3A) and reduce miscarriage rate (Additional file 1: Fig. S3B) relative to D6 normal quality blastocyst. On the other hand, we compared the effects of D5 blastocysts of different quality on pregnancy and miscarriage rates. High-quality blastocysts improved pregnancy rates (Additional file 1: Fig. S4A), but did not affect miscarriage rates (Additional file 1: Fig. S4B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A-C) and abortion ratio (D-F) between patients received different quality of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6. Fisher’s exact test

Full size image

The pregnancy ratio and abortion ratio between patients received different incubation outcomes of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6

Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio and abortion ratio between patients received different incubation outcomes of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6 were shown in Fig. 4. D5 hatched blastocysts had a higher pregnancy rate than D6 hatched blastocysts (Fig. 4A), but there was no significant difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups (Fig. 4D). D5 full recovery blastocysts had a higher pregnancy rate and lower miscarriage rate than D6 full recovery blastocysts, but only the miscarriage rate was significantly different (Fig. 4B, E). Similarly, D5 partially resuscitated blastocysts had a higher pregnancy rate and lower miscarriage rate than D6 partially resuscitated blastocysts, but there was no significant difference, which may be due to the small sample size (Fig. 4C, F). In addition, we also compared the differences in pregnancy and miscarriage rates between different recovery states of D5 blastocysts. D5 hatched blastocysts improved pregnancy rates compared to D5 fully resuscitated blastocysts, but had no effect on miscarriage rates (Additional file 1: Fig. S5A, B). D5 hatched blastocysts showed no difference in pregnancy and miscarriage rates compared to D5 partially resuscitated blastocysts (Additional file 1: Fig. S5C, D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A-C) and abortion ratio (D-F) between patients received different incubation outcomes of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and frozen-thawed D6. Fisher’s exact test

Full size image

Discussion

Chromosomal screening has become a routine test in many IVF practices around the world. Reliable information on the euploid status of embryos creates a solid basis for significantly improved outcomes of IVF treatment. PGT is suitable for recurrent miscarriage and the prevention of genetic diseases. The purpose of PGT is to block chromosomal diseases and single-gene genetic diseases before successful pregnancy, which can significantly increase the pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Previous FISH-based preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) has shown that more rapidly developing cleavage stage embryos are more likely to have various genetic abnormalities [13]. Although data on the timing of blastocyst development and the genetic status of embryos are limited and fragmented, several studies have reported higher clinical pregnancy rates in non-PGS cases in which faster developing blastocysts were selected for embryo transfer [14]. Previous studies have shown that embryos that pass cell cycle checkpoints without delay are more likely to rapidly complete mitosis and inflate or hatch blastocysts in the morning on day 5 (~ 116 h) [15]. The limitation of PGT is that it is an invasive test that requires the extraction of a portion of the embryo (biopsy of the embryo) for genetic testing. Although some studies have shown that embryo biopsy performed at D5 has no negative impact on embryo viability, inappropriate manipulation may still affect embryo survival and development. In addition, screening for PGT resulted in a substantial reduction in the number of available embryos. In many cases of PGT, the patient’s euploid embryos have similar morphological features, but the embryos can be biopsied (and subsequently frozen) at different times: most commonly on day 5 or 6, or even on day 7 [16]. To optimize the clinical outcome of a PGT cycle, another variable should be considered in addition to embryo morphology. This variable is the time a particular euploid embryo is available for biopsy [17]. The correlations between embryonic developmental dynamics, blastocyst chromosomal status, and clinical outcomes of the PGS cycle still require more studies to analyze.

Embryo quality, endometrial receptivity and synchronization between embryos and endometrium are the three most critical elements influencing the outcome of assisted reproductive pregnancy [18]. Embryo quality is the main determinant of pregnancy outcome [19, 20]. High-quality blastocysts with better developmental potential need to be evaluated in terms of morphology, developmental days, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis [21]. Developmental days are an important evaluation factor. At present, the results reported in the literature are inconsistent about whether the blastocyst development day exert influence on the implantation rate and pregnancy rate [22]. It has been reported that D5 and D6 blastocysts showed similar euploidy rate [23]. A meta-analysis of 15 resuscitated blastocyst transfer studies included 2502 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cases and found that the live birth rate, continued pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate after blastocyst transfer in the D6 group were remarkably lower than those in the D5 group. However, there was no statistical difference in the exact comparison of blastocyst transfer outcomes from D5 and D6 to the same stage [24]. Similar findings were also reported by Yang et al., who analyzed 1374 D5 blastocysts and 255 D6 blastocysts and found that D5 high-quality blastocysts and D6 high-quality blastocysts showed almost identical clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate (52 0.4% vs. 52.6%; 38.9% vs. 35.6%) [25]. In addition, D4 embryos are not clinically used for PGT and embryo transfer because D4 embryos belong to the early stage of blastocyst development and cannot meet the requirements of PGT. While D7 blastocysts are in the metamorphic stage, and D7 blastocyst suppression resulted in significantly lower clinical pregnancy rates.

In fact, current mainstream research suggests that D5 embryos have better clinical outcomes than D3 and D6 embryos. The research of Kovalevsky et al. showed that the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and baby carrier rate after freeze-thaw transfer of D5 blastocysts were significantly higher than those of D6 blastocysts [26]. It has been demonstrated that day 5 vitrified blastocysts have a higher clinical pregnancy rate than day 6 vitrified blastocysts [27]. In this study, we also reported that D5 blastocysts possessed enhanced transfer success rate and lower miscarriage rates relative to D6 blastocysts, which was also consistent with some previous studies. We reported that the high-quality blastocyst acquisition rate in D5 group was higher than that in D6 group, and the proportion of partial hatching and complete hatching in D5 group was higher than that in D6 group, with significant differences. During the biopsy, we also observed that D5 trophoblast cells were more prone to rupture upon aspiration, and the number and integrity of cells obtained were worse than those of D6. Therefore, D5 blastocysts yield less cell number and integrity than D6 blastocysts.

To investigate the impact of blastocyst development quality on pregnancy outcomes, we also compared the effects of D5 and D6 blastocysts of different quality on post-transfer pregnancy and miscarriage rates in this study. D5 high-quality blastocysts exhibited an enhanced pregnancy rate than D6 high-quality blastocysts, but there was no significant difference in the miscarriage rate between the two groups. There were no differences in pregnancy and miscarriage rates between D5 normal quality blastocysts and D6 high quality blastocysts. Likewise, no significant differences were observed in pregnancy and miscarriage rates between D5 average quality blastocysts and D6 average quality blastocysts. Our research suggests that the effect of embryo quality on D5 and D6 blastocysts is mainly reflected in the implantation success rate.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we mainly compared the effects of embryo development time, embryo quality and different recovery status on the outcomes of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in this study. The present research shows that D5 blastocysts have higher embryo transfer success rates and lower miscarriage rates relative to D6 embryos. While D5 high-quality blastocysts had higher pregnancy rates than D6 high-quality blastocysts, no significant difference was observed in miscarriage rates between the two groups. Therefore, blastocyst grade and embryo biopsy date are two important factors that must be considered in clinical frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

PGT:

Preimplantation genetic testing

IVF:

Vitro fertilization

hCG:

Human chorionic gonadotropin

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

References

  1. Zhai F, Wang Y, Li H, Wang Y, Zhu X, Kuo Y, Guan S, Li J, Song S, He Q, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement based on low-coverage next-generation sequencing accurately discriminates between normal and carrier embryos for patients with translocations. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45:473–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Z, Zhang L, Wang Y, Bi X, Liang L, Yuan Y, Su D, Wu X. Logistic regression analyses of factors affecting the euploidy of blastocysts undergoing in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic testing. Medicine. 2022;101:e29774.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Koeck RM, Busato F, Tost J, Consten D, van Echten-Arends J, Mastenbroek S, Wurth Y, Remy S, Langie S, Nawrot TS, et al. Methylome-wide analysis of IVF neonates that underwent embryo culture in different media revealed no significant differences. NPJ Genom Med. 2022;7:39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Pier BD, Havemann LM, Quaas AM, Heitmann RJ. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers: time to adopt a more natural approach? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:1909–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saupstad M, Freiesleben NC, Skouby SO, Andersen LF, Knudsen UB, Petersen KB, Husth M, Egeberg A, Petersen MR, Ziebe S, et al. Preparation of the endometrium and timing of blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfers (mNC-FET): a study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e031811.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;1:CD003414.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li H, Shen T, Sun X. Monozygotic dichorionic-diamniotic pregnancies following single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a retrospective case series. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Maji D, Agarwal R, Lele PR, Bandhu HC, Biswas M. First trimester obstetric outcome of frozen thawed embryo transfer: does the stage of embryo make any difference? Med J Armed Forces India. 2020;76:312–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Spijkers S, Lens JW, Schats R, Lambalk CB. Fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer compared to natural conception: differences in perinatal outcome. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2017;82:538–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rao J, Qiu F, Tian S, Yu Y, Zhang Y, Gu Z, Cai Y, Jin F, Jin M. Clinical outcomes for Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryo transfers versus Day 5 or 6 single blastocyst transfer in frozen-thawed cycles: a retrospective comparative analysis. J Int Med Res. 2021;49:3000605211062461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu H, Qiu S, Chen X, Zhu S, Sun Y, Zheng B. D6 blastocyst transfer on day 6 in frozen-thawed cycles should be avoided: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilgory A, Kalma Y, Kopel R, Azem F. Transfer of day 6 frozen-thawed blastocysts on day 5 compared with day 6: catching up with the window of implantation—a retrospective study. Reprod Sci. 2021;28:2208–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu FS, Weng SP, Shen MS, Ma PC, Wu PK, Lee NC. Suboptimal trophectoderm mitochondrial DNA level is associated with delayed blastocyst development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:587–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sardana P, Banker J, Gupta R, Kotdawala A, Lalitkumar PGL, Banker M. The influence of delayed blastocyst development on the outcome of frozen-thawed transfer of euploid and untested embryos. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020;13:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barash OO, Ivani KA, Willman SP, Rosenbluth EM, Wachs DS, Hinckley MD, Pittenger Reid S, Weckstein LN. Association between growth dynamics, morphological parameters, the chromosomal status of the blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in IVF PGS cycles with single embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1007–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen L, Diao Z, Wang J, Xu Z, Zhang N, Fang J, Lin F. The effects of the day of trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst grade on the clinical and neonatal outcomes of preimplantation genetic testing-frozen embryo transfer cycles. Zygote. 2022;30:132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida IH, Santos M, Berton CZ, Chiarella CL, Tanada MS, Carvalho EBC, Barbosa WP. CP: can trophectoderm morphology act as a predictor for euploidy? JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018;22:113–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bortoletto P, Bakkensen J, Anchan RM. Embryo transfer: timing and techniques. Minerva Endocrinol. 2018;43:57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martins WP, Nastri CO, Rienzi L, van der Poel SZ, Gracia C, Racowsky C. Blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis of reproductive outcomes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:583–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wintner EM, Hershko-Klement A, Tzadikevitch K, Ghetler Y, Gonen O, Wintner O, Shulman A, Wiser A. Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome? J Ovarian Res. 2017;10:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Swain JE. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:6–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitney JB, Balloch K, Anderson RE, Nugent N, Schiewe MC. Day 7 blastocyst euploidy supports routine implementation for cycles using preimplantation genetic testing. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019;23:45–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sunkara SK, Siozos A, Bolton VN, Khalaf Y, Braude PR, El-Toukhy T. The influence of delayed blastocyst formation on the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1906–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang H, Yang Q, Dai S, Li G, Jin H, Yao G, Sun Y. Comparison of differences in development potentials between frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:865–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bourdon M, Pocate-Cheriet K, Finet de Bantel A, Grzegorczyk-Martin V, Amar Hoffet A, Arbo E, Poulain M, Santulli P. Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1948–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang H, Arhin SK, Zhao J, Hou X, Chen Y, Huang Z. Delayed development influences the outcome of different grades of D5 and D6 blastocysts during freeze-thaw cycle. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2019;65:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170817).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China

    Guanling Yu, Shuiying Ma, Hui Liu, Yujin Liu, Haozhen Zhang & Keliang Wu

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, 250021, Shandong, China

    Wenjia Zhang

Authors
  1. Guanling Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuiying Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yujin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Haozhen Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wenjia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Keliang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

GY, SM, HL, YL, HZ, WZ and KW conducted the experiments and analyzed the data. GY, SM and HL conceived the study. FW coordinated and supervised the study. GY, SM, HL, YL, HZ, WZ and KW wrote the manuscript. GY, SM, HL, YL, HZ, WZ and KW approved the publication of this paper, and are accountable for all aspects of the work and ensure the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wenjia Zhang or Keliang Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University. This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki, Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.

Consent for publication

All of the authors have consented to publication of this research.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

More representative images of blastocysts from frozen-thawed D5 (A) and frozen-thawed D6 (B). Figure S2. Representative images of blastocysts from frozen-thawed D5 (A) and frozen-thawed D6 (B) during aspiration. Figure S3. Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A) and abortion ratio (B) between patients received high quality of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5 and general quality from frozen-thawed D6. Fisher’s exact test. Figure S4. Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A) and abortion ratio (B) between patients received different quality of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5. Fisher’s exact test. Figure S5. Comparisons of the pregnancy ratio (A, B) and abortion ratio (C, D) between patients received different incubation outcomes of blastocyst transplantation from frozen-thawed D5. Fisher’s exact test.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, G., Ma, S., Liu, H. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed D5 and D6 blastocysts undergoing preimplantation genetic testing. J Transl Med 20, 545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03762-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03762-4

Keywords

  • Frozen-thawed blastocyst
  • Embryo transfer
  • Assisted reproduction
  • Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us