Skip to main content

The maintained attention assessment in patients affected by Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a reliable biomarker?

Abstract

The maintained attention is the cause of great functional limitations in CFS/ME, a disease that mainly affects women in the central period of life. Cognitive function is explored using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the maintained attention using the Toulouse-Piéron test with which the Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP) is obtained, the fatigue using the visual analog scale and the perception of effort using the modified Borg scale. The final sample were 84 patients (66 women/18 men) who met diagnostic criteria (Fukuda-1994, Carruthers-2011) and 22 healthy controls (14 women/8 men). Most of patients maintain normal cognitive function, showing low or very low attention score in the 70% of patients with a marked cognitive fatigue compared to the control group (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between genders in GIAP or fatigue for CFS/ME; however, sick women perceive cognitive effort higher than men. Deficits in sustained attention and the perception of fatigue, so effort after performing the proposed test are a sensitive and reliable indicator that allows us to substantiate a clinical suspicion and refer patients for further studies in order to confirm or rule out CFS/ME.

Introduction

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) was the name proposed by Acheson for a group of epidemic outbreaks that took place between 1945 and 1955 in different countries [1]. It already appears as a neurological illness in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-8) [2]. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) was described in 1988 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [3]. This nomenclature didn’t aim to replace Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and both terms (CFS/ME) were assimilated in the first world symposium (Cambridge-1990) for this pathology [4] appearing both under the neurological heading in the ICD-11 (8E49) [5].

The pathophysiology is still unknown, remaining elusive for an etiological diagnosis. It has been attributed, in part, for lacking of specific tests. At the present, there is a large number of scientific contributions, but it is still without clarifying its pathological substrate. The nuclear symptoms in this pathology are the chronic central fatigue (> 6 months) and the post-exertional malaise with recovery time longer than 24 h. Fatigue and post-exertional malaise must not be related to organic or mental pathology, being of idiopathic origin. Although, an immune compromise, such as a viral infection, is often reported by patients at the beginning of the process a morphological or biological correlation is still undefined. CFS/ME is considered a neuro-immune-endocrine dysfunction or a post-effort neuro-immune depletion.

Studies about prevalence point to a 0.89%, but with a very wide range depending on authors and the methodology. In any case, all agree that women suffer the disease at least 1.5 to twice more higher than men [6].

In spite of the plethora of symptoms showed usually by these patients often neurological manifestations are specially relevant and among them cognitive disorders have been described playing a central role [7, 8]. A meta-analysis concluded that the cognitive deficit is a primary finding independently of emotional state of patients. The deficit depends mainly on the compromise of attention, memory and reaction time. There isn´t motor deficit, vocabulary, reasoning and global functioning [9].

Attention is a multidimensional phenomenon, ambiguous and elusive, a central function devotes to control and guide the conscious activity according to a specific objective [10]. The present work is carried out through a simple test, which can be used by the general practitioner in order to orientate the evaluation of patients or by researcher to evaluate the follow up.

Material and methods

One hundred and thirteen participants were recruited, 91 affected with CFS/ME and 22 controls, during the period October 2017–December 2019.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Human Beings (CEISH) of the University of the Basque Country (nr. 80/2016 of 27/10/2016). All participants sign the informed consent.

The inclusion criteria were: age among 18–68 years, of caucasian ethnicity, provide a medical report for CFS/ME diagnose, a general blood-urine analysis in the last 6 months and a normal ECG-rest. All patients meet the criteria of Fukuda-1994 and/or Carruthers-2011.

The exclusion criteria were: be unable to conduct clinical sessions or filling out the research questionnaires, be participating in another study, pregnancy, lactation, major surgical intervention in the last year, treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy or systemic steroids during the investigation period, drug abuse in the past or present, morbid obesity, a history of cranial surgery or severe head-brain trauma. Controls don´t suffer from diseases or take drugs.

This is a retrospective and case–control study. During the evolutionary course of the investigation, two patients were excluded, one for presenting a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the other for starting treatment with Rituximab. Additionally, two patients leave the study for impairing their illness and three don´t indicate the cause.

Participant didn´t modify their daily routine, regarding drugs intake for ethical reasons. The session were always conducted by the same physician team. Tests were performed in a silent room under standard conditions of temperature and humidity, among 17:00 and 19:00 h, without general discomfort from cold, flu-like, trauma, fever or woman do not having the period.

The first session was devoted to perform the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [11]. MoCA has been designed to assess mild cognitive impairment. This instrument examines following skills: attention, concentration, executive functions (including ability for abstraction), memory, language, visual-constructive capacities, calculation and orientation. The administration requires approximately five to ten minutes, before starting some instructions have to be given. The test has been validated in Spanish (Lozano et al). It has a maximum score of 30 points, a cut-off score of 13 points for dementia and 20 points for mild cognitive impairment [12].

In the second session, the maintained or executive attention is assessed by the Toulouse-Piéron test. This questionnaire was constructed to have an instrument that would allow the measurement of sustained attention—concentration and resistance to monotony. According to the bibliography [13], the proposed test is one of the most relevant for this scope. In the present study was used the eighth edition adapted to Spanish. The test contains 1.600 graphic elements (squares that have a dash on one of their sides or edges) distributed in 40 rows [14]. It is used to obtain the Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP). Prior to start and after answering, participant reflects their perception of fatigue in a visual analogue scale (VAS-fatigue) [15]. Finally, the modified scale of perception effort (Borg) is completed [16, 17].

Statistical analysis

The scope of the study is to compare the behavior of variables in both groups. Therefore, with the aim of finding the most appropriate analysis in each case, normality tests have been performed, such as Kolmogorov–Smirnov or Shapiro–Wilk, depending on the sample size for each case. Once these contrasts have been carried out, the equality of means has been tested in the sample groups using parametric tests (t-student) if the studied variables could be considered normal, and U Mann–Whitney contrasts otherwise. Statistical significance was considered when p < 0.05, using bilateral contrast. Analysis have been carried out using the Studio Version 0.99.489 program and the graphics have been made with microsoft excel.

Results

The final sample consisted of 84 CFS/ME patients, with a mean age of 44.41 ± 9.37 years (range of 18–61), being 66 female and 18 male, and 22 (14 females and 8 males) serve as controls with a mean age of 45 ± 13.15 years (range of 18–64). There were a greater number of women among the patients, almost in a ratio 4:1. The affected group corresponds mainly to the age group of 35–51 years (64.28%). For ethical reasons medication such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, anxiolytics and anti-depressant was not withdrawn. Only the 16.6% of the sample didn`t take any drug daily.

Educational level of patients and control participants is recorded in order to avoid out bias due to this feature. Groups showed the following distribution: with an university degree the 61% of CFS/ME patients and the 64% of controls; high school 20% and 9% respectively; technical training a 14% in both groups and primary studies the 5% of CFS/ME and the 14% of the control group.

The scores of MoCA test showed significant differences between CFS/ME-group and control-one, being higher the score for control group but both were inside the normality-rank. Only some cases of CFS/ME-group (N = 5; 3 females/2 males; 6%) presented a mild cognitive impairment (< 21 score). Women from CFS/ME group performed the test significantly better than men (Table 1).

Table 1 Data of the tests used in the cognitive evaluation

Regarding maintained attention test, there were significant statistically differences in the Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP) between CFS/ME and control groups, but not among women and men with the syndrome. Attention records were mainly low (52%), very low (18%) and not evaluable (6%), this last by abandonment due to very high fatigability experimented by some sick. Regarding attention deficit only 20 patients of CFS/EM- group (24%) arrived to medium level, meanwhile in the control group was the predominant step (68% of participants). There were not statistically significant differences among gender in CFS/ME- group for any level, being most of patient in the low level (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maintained attention with Global Index of Attention and Perception (GIAP). The figure reflects the distribution of the number of patients, placed above the bars (ordinate axis), for the categorization of the Global Index Attention and Perception (GIAP). Note the cognitive deficit in maintained attention for CFS/ME in 10 min (76%- N = 64). Five sicks are unable to finish the test due to very high mental fatigue

Fatigue evaluation show highly significant differences between both groups in any situation (Table 1). Comparing the evolution of this fatigability after the administration of the Toulouse-Piéron test is remarkable the highly significant differences (p < 0.001) reported by CFS/EM- group (women as well as men) stand out compared to the no difference reported by the control group (Table 2).

Table 2 Data of perception fatigue pre vs. post with Tolouse-Piéron test

Perception of effort referred by CFS/EM patients was significantly higher than for control participants (p < 0.001). In addition, comparing gender in that group women showed higher levels than men (p < 0.05; Table 1).

Some patients (N = 15) provided a psychiatric diagnosis of reactive depression. It should be noted that, there were not differences in GIAP between these patients and the rest (N = 69; p = 0.116).

Discussion

Patients diagnosed of CFS/ME reported fatigue (physical and mental), according to the definition of the Japanese Society of Fatigue Science: “a decline in the ability and efficiency of mental and/or physical activities that isn´t caused by excessive mental or physical activities or disease” [18]. A medical evaluation of the studied patient didn´t reveal any alteration that could explain their general weakness or tiredness and much less a hard and rapid cognitive fatigability with stressful perceived effort referred after a demanding cognitive task for 10 min.

For instance, various studies have reflected changes referred to an increase in ventricular lactate. It may be registered by Magnetic Resonance (spectroscopy) and may be the consequence of an increased anaerobic metabolism [19,20,21,22]. Glutathione decrease points to a deregulation of oxidative metabolism and mitochondrial function, aspect to be considered in marked fatigability [21, 23, 24]. However, these changes are not specific of CFS/ME, since they have also been evidenced in other pathologies [25]. Cerebral perfusion decrease have been probed by various techniques (Magnetic Resonance-RM Arterial Spin Labeling), showing consistent results [26,27,28]. Fatigue mechanisms remain still unknown and some of these points are essential parameters for monitoring brain metabolism. The increase in lactate and free radicals has been referred to explain this cognitive deterioration. However, our team points to a possible inability of the glymphatic system. It would be unable to eliminate the metabolic waste, a hypothesis alluded to in other neurological processes with cognitive problems such as Alzheimer's disease [29].

Our study shows clinical changes using a simple test. This is a significant advantage comparing to physical exertion test or cardiopulmonary stress test [30]. These tests require of great efforts from patients. These patients are characterized by their lability, weakness and sometimes marked dysautonomia as in people with (v.g. orthostatic intolerance syndrome) [31]. Our results represent a reliable alternative and they are in line with recent meta-analysis, questioning the current scales and tools to evaluate fatigue and fatigue-inducing disorders [32].

The Toulouse-Piéron test explores different types of attention: arousal attention (alert/activation), focused attention (in front of some stimulus) and sustained attention (attending a stimulus for a long time). These kinds of attention compromise various neuroanatomic structures, pathways, neurotransmitters and their receptors. Results are in agreement with others cognitive tests (v.g. Stroop test), reflecting impairment in cognitive performance. The cognitive impairment points to the neural networks involved in attention and focus the pathological substrate in areas like the anterior cingulate cortex, lateral ventral prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia or locus coeruleus [33,34,35]. Some of them have been explored using MRI (DTI-diffusion tensor). No significant differences in volume of gray matter and other parameters have been found. Only one research group referred the increase of anisotropy in the arcuate fasciculus in a small sample of patients, postulating this feature as a potential biomarker [36]. However, by the time no one other group has verified these findings.

Robison et al. (2019) reported impaired autonomic control of the heart rate (dysautonomia) associated to reductions in basic processing speed [37]. On the fatigability, the neuroendocrine system plays a key role, since there is a deficit in the modulation of stress mechanisms. Several authors have published irregular changes of cortisol levels, remaining unclear its role in mental fatigue and attention deficit [38,39,40,41,42,43]. However, a hypoactive HPA axis in these patients seems to be more a consequence than a cause. It remains to be elucidated the role played by paraventricular nucleus, pituitary and adrenal glands (HPA) in the cortisol metabolism. Neurobiological studies suggest the role of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis (BNST) as modulator of mood, anxiety and fear connecting essential emotional processing regions, such as the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus and the amygdala with the paraventricular nucleus triggering the stimulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis [44].

In general people with CFS/ME perceive aerobic exercise as more effortful than healthy adults, this aspect is reflected in a meta-analysis but the exact causes are unclear [45]. The relevance of this effect requires further studies in order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. They could provide information about the pathophysiology of the syndrome. Furthermore, it is to be taken into account that the effort perception could be related to differences in the immune system between genders and also to changes in the hormonal profile [46]. Recent investigations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells have shown a decrease in the ability to provide adequate intracellular levels of ATP, but only in six patients [47], aspect that needs a higher level of research to know the response to effort.

The own nature of a cross-sectional study and the uninterrupted intake of medication for ethical reasons, must be taken into account as potential limitations of the present study. Wider cohorts are necessaries to find significant clustering of homogeneous phenotypes since this is a pathology with a high clinical heterogeneity [48] and multiple comorbidities.

Future studies, using advanced technologies (v.g. RM/PET-scan, magneto-electroencephalography) should deep into attention deficit, especially stratifying phenotypes or subgroups based on clinical characteristics. Brain areas involved in this function are worth of monitoring, since it has been observed that just a 10 min attentional test deteriorates it significantly.

Conclusion

General cognition remains preserved in most patients, only a small group of them shows a significant mild cognitive impairment. Maintained attention is clearly deficient, showing a marked fatigability after the Toulouse-Piéron test. The effort was perceived as very hard by both gender, but higher by women.

This study proposes a simple clinical way to assess maintained attention. Present results support the reliability of maintained attention as biomarker of CFS/ME. Attention deficit is a significant disability in patients affected of central fatigue.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.

    Acheson ED. A new clinical entity? Lancet. 1956;26:789–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases. 8th Revision ed. Diseases of the nervous system p. 158. (ICD-8); Code 323. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 1967.

  3. 3.

    Holmes GP, Kaplan JE, Gantz NM, Komaroff AL, Schonberger LB, Straus SE, et al. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A working case definition. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108(3):387–9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-108-3-387.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hyde BM, Goldstein JA, Levine P. The clinical and scientific basis of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Ottawa (Ontario, Canadá): Nightingale Research Foundation; 1992.

  5. 5.

    World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 11th rev. Chapter VIII: Diseases of the nervous system (Others disorders of the nervous system) (ICD-11); Code 8E49. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02428.x.

  6. 6.

    Lim E-J, Ahn Y-C, Jang E-S, Lee S-W, Lee S-H, Son C-G. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). J Transl Med. 2020;18:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02269-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sulheim D, Fagermoen E, Sivertsen ØS, Winger A, Wyller VB, Glenne M. Cognitive dysfunction in adolescents with chronic fatigue: a cross-sectional study. Arch Dis Child. 2015;100(9):838–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cvejic E, Birch RC, Vollmer-Conna U. Cognitive dysfunction in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a review of recent evidence. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2016;18(5):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-016-0577-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cockshell SJ, Mathias JL. Cognitive functioning in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2010;40(8):1253–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709992054.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tudela P. Atención, En J. L. Fernández- Trespalacios y P. Tudela (Coords.), Atención y percepción. Vol. 3 (pp. 119–163). En J. Mayory, J. L. Pinillos (Eds.), Tratado de Psicología General. Madrid: Alhambra; 1992.

  11. 11.

    Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Amer Geria Soci. 2005;53(4):695–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lozano M, Hernández M, Turró O, Pericot I, López-Pousa S, Vilalta J. Validación del Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA): test de cribado para el deterioro cognitivo leve Datos preliminares. Alzheimer Real Invet Demenc. 2009;43:4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Morales M, Sosa MA, Quattrocchio L. Estudio de la confiabilidad de la prueba Toulouse-Piéron (versión 6ª edición revisada). Diagnosis. 2014;11:9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yela M, Dpto de I+D+I de TEA ediciones. Toulouse-Piéron-Revisado, prueba perceptiva y de atención. 8ª edición. Madrid: TEA ediciones; 2013.

  15. 15.

    Lee KA, Hicks G, Nino G. Validity and reliability of a scale to assess fatigue. Psychiatry Res. 1991;36(3):291–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(91)90027-m.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Borg G. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2:92–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in health individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(11):873–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404102320761787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kitani T. Term Commitee of Japanese Society of Fatigue Science. Nihon Hirougakkaishi (In Japanese). 2011;6(2):1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mathew SJ, Mao X, Keegan KA, Levine SM, Smith EL, Heier LA, et al. Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid lactate is increased in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome compared with generalized anxiety disorder: an in vivo 3.0 T (1)H MRS imaging study. NMR Biomed. 2009;22(3):251–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1315.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Murrough JW, Mao X, Collins KA, Kelly C, Andrade G, Nestadt P, et al. Increased ventricular lactate in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome measured by 1H MRS imaging at 3.0 T. II: comparison with major depressive disorder. NMR Biomed. 2010;23(6):643–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1512.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shungu DC, Weiduschat N, Murrough JW, Mao X, Pillemer S, Dyke JP, et al. Increased ventricular lactate in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Relationships to cortical glutathione and clinical symptoms implicate oxidative stress in disorder pathophysiology. NMR Biomed. 2012;25(9):1073–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2772.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Natelson BH, Mao X, Stegner AJ, Lange G, Vu D, Blate M, et al. Multimodal and simultaneous assessments of brain and spinal fluid abnormalities in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and the effects of psychiatric comorbidity. J Neurol Sci. 2017;375:411–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2017.02.046.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Natelson BH, Vu D, Coplan JD, Mao X, Blate M, Kang G, et al. Elevations of ventricular lactate levels occur in both Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia. Fatigue. 2017;5(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21641846.2017.1280114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chen C. Neurometabolites in anterior cingulate cortex in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A magnetic resonance spectroscopy study at 7 Tesla [Master Thesis]. Oxford: University of Oxford (Department of Psychiatry); 2017. p. 49.

  25. 25.

    Bradley KAL, Mao X, Case JAC, Kang G, Shungu DC, Gabbay V. Increased ventricular cerebrospinal fluid lactate in depressed adolescents. Eur Psychiatry. 2016;32:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.08.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Biswal B, Kunwar P, Natelson BH. Cerebral blood flow is reduced in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome as assessed by Arterial Spin Labeling. J Neurol Sci. 2011;301(12):9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2010.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    He J, Hollingsworth KG, Newton JL, Blamire AM. Cerebral vascular control is associated with skeletal muscle pH in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients both at rest and during dynamic stimulation. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;5(2):168–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2012.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gay CW, Robinson ME, Lai S, O´Shea, A., Craggs, J.G., Price, D.D., et al. Abnormal resting-state functional connectivity in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Results of seed and data-driven analyses. Brain Connect. 2016;6(1):48–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2015.0366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rasmussen MK, Mestre H, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic pathway in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):1016–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30318-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    van Campen CL, Mc., Rowe, P.C., Visser, F.C. Two-Day Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in females with a severe grade of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Comparison with patients with mild and moderate disease. Healthcare (Basel). 2020;8(3):192. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Raj V, Opie M, Arnold AC. Cognitive and psychological issues in Postural Tachycardia Syndrome. Auton Neurosci. 2018;215:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2018.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lim E-J, Kang E-B, Jang E-S, Son C-G. The prospects of the Two-Day Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET) in ME/CFS patients: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4040. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124040.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Posner MI, Petersen SE. The attention system of the human brain. Ann Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Posner MI, Rothbart MK. Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Petersen SE, Posner MI. The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2012;35:73–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zeineh MM, Kang J, Atlas SW, Raman MM, Reiss AL, Norris JL, et al. Right Arcuate Fasciculus abnormality in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Radiology. 2015;274(2):517–26. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14141079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Robinson LJ, Gallagher P, Watson S, Pearce R, Finkelmeyer A, Maclachlan L, et al. Impairments in cognitive performance in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome are common, not related to co-morbid depression but do associate with autonomic dysfunction. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0210394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210394.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cleare AJ. The neuroendocrinology of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2003;24(2):236–52. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0014.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tak LM, Cleare AJ, Ormel J, Manoharan A, Kok IC, Wessely S, et al. Meta-analysis and meta-regression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in functional somatic disorders. Biol Psychol. 2011;87(2):183–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nijhof SL, Rutten JM, Uiterwaal CS, Bleijenberg G, Kimpen JL, Putte EM. The role of hypocortisolism in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;42:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.01.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Roerink ME, Roerink SHPP, Skoluda N, van der Schaaf ME, Hermus ARMM, van der Meer JWM, et al. Hair and salivary cortisol in a cohort of women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Hormones Behavior. 2018;103:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.05.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tomic S, Brkic S, Lendak D, Maric D, Medic Stojanoska M, Novakov Mikic A. Neuroendocrine disorder in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(4):1097–103. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1601-110.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lynn M, Maclachlan L, Finkelmeyer A, Clark J, Locke J, Todryk S, et al. Reduction of glucocorticoid receptor function in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Mediators Inflamm. 2018;8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3972104.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Goode TD, Maren S. Role of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in aversive learning and memory. Learn Mem. 2017;24(9):480–91. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.044206.116.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Barhorst EE, Andrae WE, Rayne TJ, Falvo MJ, Cook DB, Lindheimer JB. Elevated perceived exertion in people with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Fibromyalgia: A Meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020;52(12):2615–27. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. NatRevImmunol. 2016;16(10):626–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri.2016.90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fernandez-Guerra P, Gonzalez-Ebsen AC, Boonen SE, Courraud J, Gregersen N, Mehlsen J, et al. Bioenergetic and proteomic profiling of immune cells in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients: An exploratory study. Biomolecules. 2021;11(7):961. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11070961.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Williams TE, Chalder T, Sharpe M, White PD. Heterogeneity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome - empirically defined subgroups from the PACE trial. Psychol Med. 2017;47(8):1454–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716003615.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU, GIU 092/19), to the Spanish Institute for Health Research Carlos III (PI 20/01076) and the Foundation “Jesús Gangoiti Barrera” (Bilbao—Spain) for their support.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IM, methodology; LA, software; PAG, investigation; JCGE, project administration; J-VL, supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iñigo Murga.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Right to privacy and informed consent: The authors declare that no patient data appears in this article.

Consent for publication

All authors give the Publisher permission to publish this work.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murga, I., Aranburu, L., Gargiulo, P.A. et al. The maintained attention assessment in patients affected by Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a reliable biomarker?. J Transl Med 19, 494 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03153-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-021-03153-1

Keywords

  • Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
  • Maintained attention
  • Toulouse-Piéron test