Skip to content

Advertisement

Journal of Translational Medicine

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome

  • Vegard Bruun Wyller1, 2Email author,
  • Chinh Bkrong Nguyen1,
  • Judith Anita Ludviksen3, 4 and
  • Tom Eirik Mollnes3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Journal of Translational Medicine201715:245

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1350-1

Received: 27 July 2017

Accepted: 25 November 2017

Published: 4 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent and disabling condition among adolescent. The disease mechanisms are unknown. Previous studies have suggested elevated plasma levels of several cytokines, but a recent meta-analysis of 38 articles found that of 77 different cytokines measured in plasma, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) was the only one that was elevated in patients compared to controls in a sufficient number of articles. In the present study we therefore compared the plasma levels of the three TGF-β isoforms in adolescent CFS patients and healthy controls. In addition, the study explored associations between TGF-β levels, neuroendocrine markers, clinical markers and differentially expressed genes within the CFS group.

Methods

CFS patients aged 12–18 years (n = 120) were recruited nation-wide to a single referral center as part of the NorCAPITAL project (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT01040429). A broad case definition of CFS was applied, requiring 3 months of unexplained, disabling chronic/relapsing fatigue of new onset, whereas no accompanying symptoms were necessary. Healthy controls (n = 68) were recruited from local schools. The three isoforms of TGF-β (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3) were assayed using multiplex technology. Neuroendocrine markers encompassed plasma and urine levels of catecholamines and cortisol, as well as heart rate variability indices. Clinical markers consisted of questionnaire scores for symptoms of post-exertional malaise, inflammation, fatigue, depression and trait anxiety, as well as activity recordings. Whole blood gene expression was assessed by RNA sequencing in a subgroup of patients (n = 29) and controls (n = 18).

Results

Plasma levels of all three isoforms of TGF-β were equal in the CFS patients and the healthy controls. Subgrouping according to the Fukuda and Canada 2003 criteria of CFS did not reveal differential results. Within the CFS group, all isoforms of TGF-β were associated with plasma cortisol, urine norepinephrine and urine epinephrine, and this association pattern was related to fatigue score. Also, TGF-β3 was related to expression of the B cell annotated genes TNFRSF13C and CXCR5.

Conclusions

Plasma levels of all TGF-β isoforms were not altered in adolescent CFS. However, the TGF-β isoforms were associated with neuroendocrine markers, an association related to fatigue score. Furthermore, TGF-β3 might partly mediate an association between plasma cortisol and B cell gene expression.

Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT01040429

Keywords

Chronic fatigue syndromeAdolescentInflammationTransforming growth factor beta

Background

Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is a long-lasting and disabling condition characterized by disproportional fatigue after exertions, musculoskeletal pain, headaches, cognitive impairments, orthostatic intolerance and other symptoms [1, 2]. CFS is a major threat towards adolescent health. The prevalence among teenagers is estimated at 0.1–1.0% [3, 4], and the condition may have detrimental effects on psychosocial and academic development [5], as well as family functioning [6].

Disease mechanisms of CFS remain poorly understood. However, several studies indicate modest immunological alterations, such as enhancement of systemic inflammation [79] and attenuation of B cell function [1012]. A recent study on whole blood gene expression in CFS corroborated a general picture of increased innate immunity and decreased B cell differentiation and survival in CFS [13].

Despite these findings, studies of plasma cytokine levels have been inconclusive; findings include increased levels of interleukin (IL)-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [14], increased levels of IL-1α and IL-1β but normal levels of TNF [15], and no differences between CFS patients and healthy controls [16, 17]. A recent review including meta-analysis of 38 articles studying all together 77 different cytokines, including interleukins, chemokines and growth factors, found evidence of elevated blood levels only of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) in CFS (63% of the studies), whereas other cytokines were not found to be consistently altered in any direction [18]. In a previous study from our laboratory [17], we found that the 27 plasma cytokines measured were identical in the CFS and the control group, without any tendency for differences. This study using modern multiplex technique did not, however, include TGF-β, which here prompted us to investigate our population for this marker, in particular extending inclusion of all three different isoforms (denoted TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3).

TGF-β is excreted by macrophages and other immune cells. All isoforms are involved in a multitude of regulatory processes, including control of inflammation and specific immunity [19]. Notably, in some conditions, TGF-β promotes inflammatory responses combined with an inhibitory effect on several stages in B cell differentiation and survival. Thus, TGF-β is a possible mediator of the subtly skewed immune responses observed in a previous CFS study [13]. Furthermore, TGF-β stimulates the generation of regulatory T cells [20], which has been shown to be increased in CFS by previous reports [21, 22].

In addition to immune changes, CFS disease mechanisms are characterized by neuroendocrine alterations including enhanced sympathetic and attenuated parasympathetic cardiovascular nervous activity [2326] and attenuation of the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis [2729]. These phenomena might be causally related, as suggested in the “sustained arousal” model of CFS [30]. For instance, sympathetic activity is shown to enhance TGF-β3 mRNA expression in macrophages [31]. Another study has demonstrated a relationship between HPA dynamics and plasma levels of TGF-β1 [32]. Recently, whole blood gene expression of immune annotated genes in CFS was demonstrated to be strongly associated with neuroendocrine markers of altered HPA-axis and autonomic nervous activity [13]. Thus, a possible relationship between neuroendocrine alterations and TGF-β levels in CFS deserves further attention.

Symptoms that might suggest immune activation, such as chills, sore throat and tender lymphatic nodes, are common complaints among CFS sufferers [1, 33]. A previous study revealed no associations between plasma cytokine levels and symptom scores [17]. Still, a relationship between differential gene expression and symptoms of post-exertional malaise, which is considered a hallmark of the CFS phenotype, has been observed [13]. This finding warrants further exploration of associations between clinical symptoms and immune markers, including TGF-β.

In general, the scientific investigation of adolescent CFS suffers several shortcomings as compared to adult CFS. For instance, to the best of our knowledge, no other studies have specifically addressed circulating TGF-β expression in adolescent CFS patients. Nevertheless, adolescent studies might benefit from low prevalence of comorbidity as well as a limited possibility of confounding effects from aging processes.

Taken together, the main aim of the present study was to compare plasma levels of TGF-β isoforms in adolescent CFS patients and healthy controls. We hypothesized increased levels among the CFS patients based on the previous meta-analysis [18]. In addition, the present study had two exploratory aims: (a) To explore associations between TGF-β levels, neuroendocrine markers and differentially expressed genes in the CFS group, and (b) To explore associations between TGF-β levels and CFS clinical symptoms.

Methods

CFS patients

This study is part of the NorCAPITAL-project (The Norwegian Study of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adolescents: Pathophysiology and Intervention Trial; ClinicalTrials ID: NCT01040429). Details of the recruitment procedure and inclusion/exclusion criteria are described elsewhere [34]. Briefly, all hospital pediatric departments in Norway (n = 20), as well as primary care pediatricians and general practitioners, were invited to refer CFS patients aged 12–18 years consecutively to our study center. A standard form required the referral unit to confirm the result of clinical investigations considered compulsory to diagnose pediatric CFS according to national Norwegian recommendations (pediatric specialist assessment, comprehensive hematology and biochemistry analyses, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and brain MRI). Also, the referring units were required to confirm that the patient (a) was unable to follow normal school routines due to fatigue; (b) was not permanently bedridden; (c) did not have any concurrent medical or psychiatric disorder that might explain the fatigue; (d) did not experience any concurrent demanding life event (such as parents’ divorce) that might explain the fatigue; (e) did not use pharmaceuticals (including hormone contraceptives) regularly. Patients considered eligible to this study were summoned to a clinical encounter at our study center after which a final decision on inclusion was made. The CFS group comprised 120 patients.

In agreement with clinical guidelines [2] and previous studies from our group [2426], we applied a ‘broad’ case definition of CFS, requiring 3 months of unexplained, disabling chronic/relapsing fatigue of new onset. We did not require that patients meet any other accompanying symptom criteria. Subgrouping of the participants according to the Fukuda case definition [35] and Canada 2003 case definition [33] was performed post hoc, based on questionnaire results (cf. below).

Healthy controls

A group of healthy controls (n = 68) with a comparable distribution of gender and age were recruited from local schools. Controls were not matched to cases on any variable. No chronic disease and no regular use of pharmaceuticals (including hormone contraceptives) were allowed.

Study design and ethics

A 1-day in-hospital assessment included clinical examination and blood sampling and always commenced between 7.30 and 9.30 a.m. All participants were instructed to fast overnight and abstain from tobacco products and caffeine for at least 48 h. The participants were instructed to apply an ointment containing the local anesthetic lidocaine (Emla®) on the skin in the antecubital area 1 h in advance. After at least 5 min supine rest in calm surroundings, blood samples were obtained in a fixed sequence from antecubital venous puncture. A questionnaire was completed after the clinical encounter and returned in a pre-stamped envelope.

Data were collected in the period from March 2010 until October 2012. The NorCAPITAL project has been approved by the Norwegian National Committee for Ethics in Medical Research (Reference ID: 2009/2541 S-09354c). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and from parents/next-of-kin if required. CFS patients were randomized to treatment with low-dose clonidine or placebo and followed for a total of 30 weeks; however, only baseline data are used in the present study. Details of the design are reported elsewhere [34].

TGF-β isoforms: TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3

The blood samples for TGF-β analyses were collected in 4 ml EDTA tubes. The samples were placed on ice for approximately 30 min; thereafter, plasma was separated by centrifugation (2500g, 10 min, 4 °C) and frozen at − 80 °C until assayed. The samples were analyzed using Bio-Plex Human TGF-β 3-plex (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA), containing the three isoforms of TGF-β: TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3. The assay was performed using the Bio-Plex 200 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.) according to the manufactures’ instructions. All samples were obtained, treated stored and analysed in exactly in the same way, using the same personnel at each step, to exclude methodological variation since TGFβ is sensible for sample handling, including release from platelets.

Neuroendocrine markers

Blood samples for analyses of plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine were obtained in vacutainer tubes treated with ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA)–glutathione. The samples were placed on ice for approximately 30 min, and thereafter separated by centrifugation (2250×g, 15 min, 4 °C) and assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a reversed-phase column and glassy carbon electrochemical detector (Antec, Leyden Deacade II SCC, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands) as described in detail elsewhere [29]. Blood samples for analyses of plasma cortisol were obtained in 4 ml EDTA vacutainer tubes; plasma cortisol levels were determined by routine assays at the accredited laboratory at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Morning spot urine samples for norepinephrine and epinephrine analyses were assayed with the same HPLC protocol as for plasma measurements, whereas morning spot urine free cortisol (non-conjugated cortisol) was assayed by solid phase competitive luminescence immunoassay (type Immulite® 2000, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, NY, USA). The urine levels of creatinine were analyzed using standard automatic analyzer techniques at the accredited laboratory at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Indices of heart rate variability (HRV) were obtained from ECG recordings of participants laying in a horizontal position and connected to the Task Force Monitor (TFM) (Model 3040i, CNSystems Medizintechnik, Graz, Austria). Methodological details are provided elsewhere [36]. Power spectral analysis of HRV was automatically provided by the TFM, returning numerical values for low frequency (LF) power (0.05–0.17 Hz), high frequency (HF) power (0.17–0.4 Hz) and the LF/HF ratio. HF power is considered indicative of parasympathetic heart rate modulation, LF power reflects the combined effect of sympathetic and parasympathetic heart rate control, whereas the LF/HF ratio is an index of sympathetic/parasympathetic balance.

Routine blood analyses

The serum concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) was analyzed using a highly sensitive assay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), as described previously [34]. Hematology and biochemistry routine assays were performed at the accredited laboratory at Oslo University Hospital, Norway.

Whole blood gene expression

In a subgroup of 29 CFS patients and 18 healthy controls, RNA was extracted from whole blood as described in details elsewhere [13]. RNA samples with RNA integrity number value ≥ 7 were used for gene expression characterization by RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) (Run by the Genomics Core Facilities at the Oslo University Hospital Radiumhospitalet). RNA reads were mapped to the human genome version GRCh38.p2 by STAR [37]. Gene expression abundance was quantified as reads mapped per exon by the Subread package [38]. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) between CFS patients and controls were identified using DESeq2 package [39]. In order to correct for possible confounding background factors, age groups as scaling factor and gender input were included in the design model of DESeq2. Functional annotation of genes obtained from DESeq2 was done by uploading all DEGs into HumanMine [40 ].

Clinical markers

A CFS symptom inventory for adolescents assesses the frequency of 24 common symptoms during the preceding month, as has been described elsewhere [34]. Briefly, each symptom is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from ‘never/rarely present’ to ‘present all the time’. The inventory includes the accompanying symptom of the Fukuda and Canada 2003 case definitions, facilitating post hoc subgrouping of CFS patients (Additional file 1). A composite score reflecting inflammatory symptoms was generated by taking the arithmetic mean across three single items (fever/chills, sore throat, and tender lymphatic nodes) and a composite score reflecting symptoms of post-exertional malaise was generated by taking the arithmetic mean across two single items (post-exertional fatigue and non-refreshing sleep). For both variables, the total range is from 0 to 5; higher scores imply more severe symptom burden.

The Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) total sum score is applied in the present study [41]; total range is from 0 to 33, where higher scores imply more severe fatigue. The mood and feelings questionnaire (MFQ) consists of 34 items, each scored on a 0–2 Likert scale; thus, the total sum score is from 0 to 68 [42]. The Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory subscore reflecting trait anxiety is derived from the sum across 20 items; total range is from 20 to 80 [43]. The activPAL accelerometer device (PAL Technologies Ltd, Glasgow, Scotland) was used for monitoring of daily physical activity during seven consecutive days [44], as described elsewhere [34].

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were carried out in SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). A total of 9 individuals (6 CFS patients, 3 healthy controls) had missing data for TGF-β analyses. As the CFS patients were included in a randomised controlled trial, individual data from follow-up consultations (when available) were used for imputation of missing data at baseline. The remaining missing data (3 CFS patients, 3 healthy controls) were imputed using the mean values within each group. Missing data in other variables were not imputed.

Patients with CFS were compared with healthy controls by applying independent sample t tests, Mann–Whitney tests, Pearson Chi Square tests, or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. CFS patients adhering to the Fukuda criteria and the Canada 2003-criteria were compared to the healthy controls in the same way. Associations between TGF-β and immune markers, neuroendocrine markers, single gene transcriptional counts and clinical markers within each group (CFS patients and healthy controls, respectively) were performed using correlation and linear regression analyses. A p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The correlation and linear regression analyses involved a multitude of statistical tests; however, as all these tests were considered exploratory, the p values were not adjusted.

Results

Demographic data

The 120 CFS patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria in the NorCAPITAL trial were included as the CFS patients group and 68 healthy individuals were included as control group [34]. The whole blood gene expression analysis (RNA-seq) was carried out in a random subgroup of 29 CFS patients and 18 healthy controls [13]. Gender, age and body mass index were equally distributed in the two groups (Table 1). In the CFS group, 98% were of Scandinavian ethnicity; 73% adhered to the Fukuda case definition and 38% to the Canada 2003-definition. With the exception of 1 patient, all belonging to the Canada 2003 subgroup also belonged to the Fukuda subgroup. A total of 2 CFS patients were on thyroid hormone supplement therapy, 1 used melatonin and 1 used bronchodilators occasionally; no other pharmaceuticals were used. No CFS patients and 3 healthy controls reported occasional use of illicit drugs; 78% in both groups reported no consume of alcoholic beverages. CFS patient had higher levels of serum CRP, plasma norepinephrine and plasma epinephrine, and lower levels of heart rate variability (HRV) LF-power and urine cortisol-to-creatinine ratio (Table 1). Also, CFS patients scored significantly poorer on all clinical markers (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics

 

CFS patients (n = 120)

Healthy controls (n = 68)

p valuec

Background

 Female gender

Number, %

88

73

46

68

0.563

 Age (years)

Mean, SD

15.4

1.6

15.1

1.6

0.179

 Body mass index (kg/m2)

Mean, SD

21.5

4.2

20.6

3.7

0.119

 Disease duration (months)

Median, range

18

4–104

n/a

  

 Adheres to the Fukuda criteria of CFSa

Number, %

88

73

n/a

  

 Adheres to the Canada 2003-criteria of CFSb

Number, %

46

38

n/a

  

Immune, autonomic and neuroendocrine markers

 Serum C-reactive protein (mg/l)

Median, IQR

0.43

0.96

0.35

0.46

0.049

 Heart rate variability, LF power (abs)

Median, IQR

481

772

682

1514

0.015

 Heart rate variability, HF power (abs)

Median, IQR

788

1835

1058

1837

0.070

 Heart rate variability, LF/HF-ratio

Median, IQR

0.69

0.64

0.74

0.38

0.792

 Plasma norepinephrine (pmol/l)

Mean, SD

1991

783

1483

422

< 0.001

 Plasma epinephrine (pmol/l)

Median, IQR

308

131

265

95

0.001

 Plasma cortisol (nmol/l)

Mean, SD

367

143

351

150

0.460

 Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol)

Median, IQR

12.3

5.8

10.8

5.8

0.102

 Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol)

Median, IQR

1.3

1.2

1.5

1.0

0.649

 Urine cortisol/creatinine ratio (nmol/mmol)

Median, IQR

3.4

3.1

5.3

6.0

0.001

Clinical makers

 Symptoms of post-exertional malaise (total score)

Mean, SD

4.0

1.0

1.4

0.5

< 0.001

 Inflammatory symptoms (total score)

Mean, SD

2.1

0.9

1.3

0.5

< 0.001

 Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (total score)

Mean, SD

19.3

6.1

8.7

4.6

< 0.001

 Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (total score)

Mean, SD

17.4

10.0

6.4

7.8

< 0.001

 Spielberger state-trait anxiety questionnaire (trait subscore)

Mean, SD

43.2

8.9

32.3

7.2

< 0.001

 Steps per day (number)

Mean, SD

4662

2386

10,293

3716

< 0.001

P values in italics indicate statistical significance

n/a not applicable, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range, LF low-frequency power of heart rate variability, HF high-frequency power of heart rate variability

aCf. Ref. [35]

bCf. Ref. [33]

cStatistical comparison across CFS group and HC group are based upon Independent sample t test, Mann–Whitney test or Fisher exact test as appropriate

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)

Plasma levels of all three isoforms of TGF-β (TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3) were equal in CFS patients and healthy controls (Table 2, Additional file 2: Table S1). Subgroup analyses revealed no differential results, neither for the Fukuda case definition nor for the Canada 2003-definition. Within the CFS group, TGF-β was not associated with clinical markers (Additional file 3: Table S2). Also, whole blood transcriptional counts from the TGFB1 gene in the subgroup subjected to RNA-seq were equal among CFS patients and healthy controls (1184 vs 1208, p = 0.712).
Table 2

TGF-β isoforms across CFS patients (including Fukuda and Canada 2003-subgroups) and healthy controls

 

CFS patients (n = 120)

p valuea

Healthy controls (n = 68)

CFS, Fukuda subgroup (n = 88)

p valuea

CFS, Canada 2003 subgroup (n = 46)

p valuea

Plasma TGF-β1 (pg/ml)

Median, IQR

4927

5157

0.482

5692

6350

4944

4276

0.599

4880

6247

0.831

Plasma TGF-β2 (pg/ml)

Mean, SD

758

262

0.928

754

278

712

246

0.809

780

252

0.621

Plasma TGF-β3 (pg/ml)

Median, IQR

230

227

0.901

251

250

230

208

0.990

243

254

0.760

TGF transforming growth factor beta, SD standard deviation, IQR interquartile range

aCompared with healthy controls. Statistical comparisons across groups are based upon Independent sample t test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate

TGF-β, neuroendocrine markers and fatigue score

Plasma levels of TFG-β were associated with neuroendocrine markers, in particular plasma cortisol as well as plasma and urine catecholamines. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that these associations differed in CFS patients and healthy controls (Fig. 1), despite similar levels of TFG-β in the two groups. In the CFS patients, all TGF-β isoforms were significantly and independently associated with plasma cortisol, urine norepinephrine-to-creatinine ratio and urine epinephrine-to-creatinine ratio, whereas no significant associations to these markers were observed among healthy control. This differential association pattern was related to symptom severity (Table 3). When divided according to fatigue severity (Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire), CFS patients with the highest fatigue score (≥ 20) displayed the strongest associations between TGF-β and neuroendocrine markers, whereas CFS patients with the lowest fatigue score (< 20) had a pattern of associations that was more similar to the one observed in healthy controls.
Fig. 1

Multiple linear regression models exploring associations between neuroendocrine markers and isoforms of TGF-β in CFS patients (a) and healthy controls (b). Significant associations are indicated with a continuous arrow, whereas associations close to the level of significance are indicated with a dotted arrow. P-NorEpi plasma norepinephrine, P-Epi plasma epinephrine, P-Cortisol plasma cortisol, U-NorEpi urine norepinephrine-to-creatinine ratio, U-Epi urine epinephrine:creatinine ratio, U-Cortisol urine cortisol:creatinine ratio, P-TGF plasma transforming growth factor

Table 3

Multiple linear regression models for neuroendocrine markers and plasma TGF-β in CFS patients with high fatigue score (≥ 20), CFS patients with low fatigue score (< 20), and healthy controls

 

CFS patients, high fatigue score (n = 62)b

CFS patients, low fatigue score (n = 54)b

Healthy controls (n = 68)

Model 1

 Dependent variable

  Plasma TGF-β1a

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

 Independent variables

  Plasma cortisol

1.9 × 10−3 (0.18 to 3.5 × 10−3)

0.031

0.17

0.26 × 10−3 (− 1.6 to 2.1 x 10−3)

0.780

0.12

− 0.19 × 10−3 (− 1.9 to 1.5 × 10−3)

0.825

0.07

  Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa

0.99 (0.20 to 1.8)

0.015

 

0.60 (0.01 to 1.2)

0.048

 

0.62 (− 0.06 to 1.3)

0.071

 

  Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa

− 0.65 (− 0.65 to − 0.06)

0.031

 

− 0.39 (− 0.77 to − 0.02)

0.042

 

0.004 (− 0.47 to 0.48)

0.987

 

Model 2

 Dependent variable

  Plasma TGF-β2

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

 Independent variables

  Plasma cortisol

0.64 (0.22 to 1.1)

0.003

0.22

0.07 (− 0.49 to 0.62)

0.814

0.12

− 0.01 (− 0.49 to 0.46)

0.950

0.05

  Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa

248 (50 to 447)

0.015

 

133 (− 44 to 311)

0.136

 

160 (− 28 to 349)

0.094

 

  Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa

− 161 (− 308 to − 14)

0.032

 

− 132 (− 246 to − 18)

0.024

 

− 16 (− 148 to 115)

0.806

 

Model 3

 Dependent variable

  Plasma TGF-β3a

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

B (CI)

p value

R2

 Independent variables

  Plasma cortisol

2.0 × 10−3 (0.60 to 3.4 × 10−3)

0.006

0.20

0.17 × 10−3 (− 1.6 to 1.9 × 10−3)

0.851

0.11

− 0.4 × 10−3 (− 1.8 to 0.99 × 10−3)

0.565

0.07

  Urine norepinephrine/creatinine ratioa

0.78 (0.12 to 1.4)

0.022

 

0.40 (− 0.17 to 1.0)

0.164

 

0.50 (− 0.06 to 1.1)

0.076

 

  Urine epinephrine/creatinine ratioa

− 0.52 (− 1.0 to − 0.03)

0.038

 

− 0.41 (− 0.77 to − 0.05)

0.027

 

− 0.01 (− 0.40 to 0.38)

0.964

 

P values in italics indicate statistical significance

B regression coefficient (unstandardized), CI confidence interval, R 2 explained variance of the dependent variable

aThe ln-transformed variable was used (better approximation to a normal distribution)

bFatigue score was missing from 4 CFS patients

Immune gene transcripts

Only a few differentially expressed immune gene transcripts were associated with TGF-β (Additional file 4: Table S3). However, there was a negative association, most evident for the TGF-β3 isoform, to the B cell annotated genes TNFRSF13C and CXCR5, which are both downregulated in CFS. Multiple linear regression analyses were consistent with a model in which TGF-β3 partly mediated the effect of plasma cortisol on the expression of these genes (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Multiple linear regression models in a subgroup of CFS patients (n = 29). a Previous established associations between blood monocyte count and plasma cortisol, and the expression in whole blood of the genes TNFRSF13C (tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 13C) and CXCR5 (C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 5) (Nguyen et al. [13]). b The associations after introducing TGF-β3 as a mediating variable in the regression model. Significant associations are indicated with a continuous arrow, associations close to the level of significance are indicated with a dotted arrow. B-Mono blood monocyte count, P-Cortisol plasma cortisol, P-TGF plasma transforming growth factor

Discussion

There were three main finding of this study: (1) plasma levels of the three TGF-β isoforms did not differ in adolescent CFS patients as compared to healthy controls. (2) Within the CFS group, plasma levels of all TGF-β isoforms were associated with plasma levels of cortisol and urine levels of catecholamines. In addition, TGF-β3 might partly mediate the association between plasma cortisol and downregulation of some B cell annotated genes. (3) Plasma level of TGF-β was not directly related to CFS symptoms; however, the association of neuroendocrine mediators with TGF-β were related to fatigue score.

The lack of differences between CFS patients and healthy controls corroborate previous findings of normal plasma cytokine levels in CFS [17, 18]. Of note, subgrouping according to the Fukuda criteria or the Canada 2003-criteria did not reveal differential results. This is also in line with previous observations [17, 45]. While immunological alterations have been reported in many CFS studies, there seems to be no consistent pattern of plasma cytokine disturbances, calling for more specific investigations of immune mechanisms in different bodily compartments.

Previous studies have demonstrated a complex and possible bi-directional relationship between TGF-β levels and HPA axis activity [32, 46]. Similarly, TGF-β secretion has been associated with sympathetic nervous activity [47, 48] as well as plasma catecholamines [49]. Interestingly, in the present study, linear associations between TGF-β levels and neuroendocrine markers were found among CFS patients only. Moreover, within the CFS group, this picture was remarkably consistent across all TGF-β isoforms (Fig. 1), and related to the clinical symptom of fatigue (Table 3). Taken together, the results of the present study seem to suggest that underlying disease mechanisms of CFS are more related to altered immunological control than to altered levels of immune markers per se. Similar observations have been reported in a study of neuroendocrine regulatory systems [29], and are also in line with findings of a relationship between HPA axis dynamics and clinical symptoms [50, 51].

On a more general level, the findings of the present study seem to comply with the “sustained arousal” model of CFS [30]. In this model, a maladaptive stress response is considered a central pathophysiological element, eliciting autonomic and neuroendocrine alterations which in turn are responsible for subtle immunological alterations. Thus, an association between neuroendocrine markers and immune markers is predicted from this model, in line with the reported findings. It should be noted, though, that the cross-sectional design of the present study does not allow inference of causality. Further research should aim at uncover underlying mechanisms; one promising field of study might be epigenetic alterations of the glucocorticoid receptor gene [52].

The findings of a possible relationship between TGF-β3 and B cell annotated gene transcripts should be interpreted with great caution due to the limited number of CFS patients undergoing RNA-seq (n = 29). However, the findings were rather specific for the TGF-β3 isoform, reducing the risk of a type 1-error. Besides, it is not biologically implausible that TGF-β3 might act as a mediator of a cortisol effect on B cell gene expression. This observation should be explored further in mechanistic studies of immune cell function, in particular since the Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is known to be a common precipitating factor in CFS [1]. Infection of EBV in human is persistent and tightly associated with B cell differentiation pathways. EBV establishes its long-term latency in memory B cells where its ability of switching from latent to lytic form of infection is related to the differentiation state of the cell [53]. Interestingly, it has been shown that TGF-β can induce EBV reactivation in vitro [54], and that expression of some of EBV promoters is activated in B cells upon TGF-β binding to TGF receptors [55].

In general, however, our data indicate that all three isoforms of TFG-β behave similar and that the previous data published with TFG-β, using isoform 1, is transferable to the other two isoform. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the three TGF-isotypes. Of even more importance is that the only cytokine from the meta-analysis of 38 articles and 77 cytokines [18] shown to be a possible mediator discriminating CFS patients from controls, namely the TGF-β, fail to be shown in the present study, leaving no systemic cytokines left for this purpose.

Limitations of the present study encompass the wide inclusion criteria which might have obscured results pertaining to a subgroup. However, adjusting for adherence to the Fukuda and Canada 2003 case definitions did not alter the cross-sectional comparison. Also, the fact that our inclusion criteria are not identical to common international standards might reduce generalizability. As this study only included adolescents, we do not know to what extent the results apply to adult CFS patients. The number of patients that underwent whole blood gene expression by RNA-seq was rather low, increasing the risk of type II-errors. Although blood samples for cortisol analyses were obtained at a standardized time point, we cannot rule out that sleep problems and disturbances of the diurnal rhythm in the CFS group might have confounded the results. The composite scores reflecting inflammatory symptoms and symptoms of postexertional malaise has not been formally validated, and it is possible that a relationship between TGF-β levels and symptoms might have been discovered using inventories with higher sensitivity. Furthermore, we have not assessed responses to exercise and other stimuli. Normal levels at rest do not rule out abnormal response patterns. Finally, the nature of a cross-sectional study does not allow any causal inferences to be made.

Conclusions

The main finding of this study is that plasma levels of the three TGF-β isoforms were equal in a large group of adolescent CFS patients compared to healthy controls. In addition, within the CFS group, plasma level of all TGF-β isoforms were associated with plasma levels of cortisol and urine levels of catecholamines, and these associations were related to fatigue score. Finally TGF-β3 might partly mediate an association between plasma cortisol and downregulation of some B cell annotated genes. These latter observations should be addressed in further studies aiming at unraveling the complex causal interplays between neuroendocrine signaling, subtle immune alterations and clinical symptoms in CFS.

Abbreviations

CFS: 

chronic fatigue syndrome

TGF: 

transforming growth factor

NorCAPITAL: 

The Norwegian Study of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome in Adolescents: Pathophysiology and Intervention Trial

HPA axis: 

hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis

IL: 

interleukin

TFN: 

tumor necrosis factor

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

RNA-Seq: 

RNA sequencing

DEG: 

differentially expressed genes

HPLC: 

high-performance liquid chromatography

HRV: 

heart rate variability

LF: 

low frequency

HF: 

high frequency

CFQ: 

Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire

MFQ: 

Moods and Feelings Questionnaire

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the study: VBW, TEM. Collected and analyzed the data: CBN, JAL. Interpreted the results and wrote the paper: VBW, CBN, JAL, TEM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Kari Gjersum for secretary assistance; Annette Winger, Dag Sulheim and Even Fagermoen for practical assistance.

Competing interests

The authors declare that that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article and its additional files.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Norwegian National Committee for Ethics in Medical Research and the Norwegian Medicines Agency. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants and from parents/next-of-kin if required.

Funding

This study was funded by: The University of Oslo, The Research Council of Norway, The Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, The Northern Norway Regional Health Authority. The funding has covered payroll and operating expenses for the involved researchers. No one of the funding sources has otherwise been involved in the study. The study has not received funding from the pharmaceutical industry or other commercial sources.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Akershus University Hospital
(2)
Division of Medicine and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oslo
(3)
Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital
(4)
Faculty of Health Sciences, K.G. Jebsen TREC, University of Tromsø
(5)
Department of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital
(6)
K.G. Jebsen IRC, University of Oslo
(7)
Centre of Molecular Inflammation Research, Norwegian University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: redefining an illness. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Evidence based guidelines for the management of CFS/ME (chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalopathy) in children and young adults. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health; 2004.Google Scholar
  3. Crawley EM, Emond AM, Sterne JA. Unidentified Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is a major cause of school absence: surveillance outcomes from school-based clinics. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000252.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Nijhof SL, Rutten JM, Uiterwaal CS, Bleijenberg G, Kimpen JL, Putte EM. The role of hypocortisolism in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;42:199–206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kennedy G, Underwood C, Belch JJ. Physical and functional impact of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis in childhood. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1324–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Missen A, Hollingwort W, Eaton N, Crawley E. The financial and psychological impacts on mothers of children with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS/ME). Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:505–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bansal AS, Bradley AS, Bishop KN, Kiani-Alikhan S, Ford B. Chronic fatigue syndrome, the immune system and viral infection. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:24–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Klimas NG, Broderick G, Fletcher MA. Biomarkers for chronic fatigue. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26:1202–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Raison CL, Lin JM, Reeves WC. Association of peripheral inflammatory markers with chronic fatigue in a population-based sample. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:327.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley AS, Ford B, Bansal AS. Altered functional B cell subset populations in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome compared to healthy controls. Clin Exp Immunol. 2013;172:73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Brenu EW, Huth TK, Hardcastle SL, Fuller K, Kaur M, Johnston S, Ramos SB, Staines DR, Marshall-Gradisnik SM. Role of adaptive and innate immune cells in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Int Immunol. 2014;26:233–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mensah F, Bansal A, Berkovitz S, Sharma A, Reddy V, Leandro MJ, Cambridge G. Extended B cell phenotype in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a cross-sectional study. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;184:237–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Nguyen CB, Alsøe L, Lindvall JM, Sulheim D, Fagermoen E, Winger A, Kaarbø M, Nilsen H, Wyller VB. Whole blood gene expression in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome: an exploratory cross-sectional study suggesting altered B cell differentiation and survival. J Transl Med. 2017;15:102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Maes M, Twisk FN, Ringel K. Inflammatory and cell-mediated immune biomarkers in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and depression: inflammatory markers are higher in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome than in depression. Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81:286–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fletcher MA, Zeng XR, Barnes Z, Levis S, Klimas NG. Plasmas cytokines in women with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Transl Med. 2009;7:96.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Vollmer-Conna U, Cameron B, Pavlonic DH, Singletary K, Davenport T, Vernon S, Reeves WC, Hickie I, Wakenfield D, Lloyd AR. Postinfective fatigue syndrome is not associated with altered cytokine production. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:732–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wyller VB, Vitelli V, Sulheim D, Fagermoen E, Ueland T, Mollnes TE. Plasma cytokine expression in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;46:80–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Blundell S, Ray KK, Buckland M, White PD. Chronic fatigue syndrome and circulating cytokines: a systematic review. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;50:186–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly A, Houston SA, Sherwood E, Casulli J, Travis MA. Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by TGFβ. Adv Immunol. 2017;134:137–233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sanjabi S, Oh SA, Li MO. Regulation of the immune response by TGF-β: From conception to autoimmunity and infection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9:a022236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Brenu EW, van Driel ML, Staines DR, Ashton KJ, Ramos SB, Keane J, Klimas NG, Marshall-Gradisnik SM. Immunological abnormalities as potential biomarkers in Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Transl Med. 2011;9:81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Curriu M, Carillo J, Massanella M, Riqau J, Aleqe J, Puig J, Garcia-Quintana AM, Castro-Marrerro J, Negredo E, Clotet B, Cabrera C, Blanco J. Screening NK-, B- and T-cell phenotype and function in patients suffering from Chronic fatigue syndrome. J Transl Med. 2013;11:68.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez-Martínez LA, Mora T, Varqas A, Fuentes-Iniestra M, Martínez-Lavin M. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction in fibromialgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome, and interstitial cystitis: a review of case–control studies. J Clin Rhematol. 2014;20:146–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wyller VB, Barbieri R, Saul P. Blood pressure variability and closed-loop baroreflex assessment in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome during supine rest and orthostatic stress. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:497–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wyller VB, Barbieri R, Thaulow E, Saul JP. Enhanced vagal withdrawal during mild orthostatic stress in adolescents with chronic fatigue. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2008;13:67–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wyller VB, Due R, Saul JP, Amlie JP, Thaulow E. Usefulness of an abnormal cardiovascular response during low-grade head-up tilt-test for discriminating adolescents with chronic fatigue from healthy controls. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:997–1001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Papadopoulos AS, Cleare AJ. Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;27:22–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Segal TY, Hindmarsh PC, Viner RM. Disturbed adrenal function in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2005;18:295–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wyller VB, Vitelli V, Sulheim D, Fagermoen E, Winger A, Godang K, Bollerslev J. Alterered neuroendocrine control and association to clinical symptoms in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2016;14:121.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Wyller VB, Malterud K, Eriksen HR. Can sustained arousal explain chronic fatigue syndrome? Behav Brain Funct. 2009;5:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Yanagawa Y, Hiraide S, Lizuka K. Isoform-specific regulation of transforming growth factor-β mRNA expression in macrophages in response to adrenoceptor stimulation. Microbiol Immunol. 2016;60:56–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith EL, Batuman OA, Trost RC, Coplan JD, Rosenblum LA. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and cortisol in differentially reared primates. Brain Behav Immun. 2002;16:140–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Carruthers BM, Jain AK, De Meirleir KL, Peterson DL, Klimas NG, Lerner AM, et al. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical working case definition, diagnostic and treatment protocols. J Chron Fatigue Syndr. 2003;11:7–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sulheim D, Fargermoen E, Winger A, Andersen AM, Godang K, Müller F, Rowe PC, Saul JP, Skovlund E, Øie MG, Wyller VB. Disease mechanisms and clonidine treatment in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome: a combined cross-sectional and randomized controlled trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:351–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Int Med. 1994;121:953–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fagermoen E, Sulheim D, Winger A, Andersen AM, Gjerstad J, Godang K, Rowe PC, Saul JP, Skovlund E, Wyller VB. Effects of low-dose clonidine on cardiovascular and autonomic variables in adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:117.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, Batut P, Chaisson M, Gingeras TR. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Anders S, McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Okoniewsky M, Smyth GK, Huber W, Robinson MD. Count-based differential expression analysis of RNA sequencing data using R and Bioconductor. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:1765–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. HumanMine Database, University of Cambridge, UK. https://www.humanmine.org. Accessed 23 Feb 2017.
  41. Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, et al. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37:147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Daviss WB, Birmaher B, Melhem NA, Axelson DA, Michaels SM, Brent DA. Criterion validity of the mood and feelings questionnaire for depressive episodes in clinic and non-clinic subjects. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:927–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kendall PC, Finch A Jr., Auerback SM, Hooke JF, Mikulka PJ. The state-trait anxiety inventory: a systematic evaluation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1976;44:406–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40:992–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Asprusten TT, Fagermoen E, Sulheim D, Skovlund E, Sørensen Ø, Mollnes TE, Wyller VB. Study finding challenge the content validity of the Canadian Consensus Criteria for adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104:498–503.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Coplan JD, Gopinath S, Abdallah CG, Marqolis J, Chen W, Scharf BA, Rosenblum LA, Batuman OA, Smith EL. Effects of acute confinement stress-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation and concomitant peripheral and central transforming growth factor-β1 measures in nonhuman primates. Chronic stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  47. Ebbinghaus M, Gajda M, Boettger MK, Schaible HG, Bräuer R. The anti-inflammatory effects of sympathectomy in murine antigen-induced arthritis are associated with a reduction of Th1 and Th17 responses. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:253–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoch H, Hering L, Crowley S, Zhang J, Yang G, Rump LC, Vonend O, Steqbauer J. 9A.05: sympathetic nervous system drives renal inflammation by alpha(2a)-adrenoceptors. J Hypertens. 2015;33(Suppl 1):e188.Google Scholar
  49. Rassler B, Marx G, Schierle K, Zimmer HG. Catecholamines can induce pulmonary remodeling in rats. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2012;30:1134–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hall DL, Lattei EG, Antoni MH, Fletcher MA, Czaja S, Perdomo D, Klimas NG. Stress management skills, cortisol awakening response, and post-exertional malaise in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;49:26–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Nijhof SL, Maijer K, Bleijenberg G, Uiterwaal CS, Kimpen JL, van der Putte EM. Adolscent chronic fatigue syndrome: prevalence, incidence, and morbidity. Pediatrics. 2011;127:e1169–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vangeel E, Van den Eede F, Hompes T, Izzi B, Del Favero J, Moorkens G, Lambrechts D, Freson K, Claes S. Chronic fatigue syndrome and DNA hypomethylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promotor 1F region: association with HPA axis hypofunction and childhood trauma. Psychosom Med. 2015;77:853–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Thorley-Lawson DA. EBV Persistence—introducing the virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;390:151–209.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Kenney SC, Mertz J. Regulation of the latent-lytic switch in Epstein–Barr virus. Semin Cancer Biol. 2014;26:60–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Iempridee T, Das S, Xu I, Mertz JE. Transforming growth factor beta-induced reactivation of Epstein–Barr virus involves multiple Smad-binding elements cooperatively activating expression of the latent-lytic switch BZLF1 gene. J Virol. 2011;85:7836–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement