Open Access

Long-term kidney survival analyses in IgA nephropathy patients under steroids therapy: a case control study

  • Yanhong Yuan1,
  • Qin Wang1,
  • Zhaohui Ni1,
  • Xiajing Che1,
  • Liou Cao1,
  • Xinghua Shao1,
  • Minfang Zhang1,
  • Yuanyuan Xie1,
  • Chaojun Qi1,
  • Wenyan Zhou1,
  • Lei Tian1 and
  • Shan Mou1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine201513:186

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0549-2

Received: 10 March 2015

Accepted: 26 May 2015

Published: 6 June 2015

Abstract

Background

Corticosteroids are preferred to treat patients with active IgA nephropathy (IgAN), and beneficial effects from the short-term use of corticosteroids have been confirmed. However, a large number of patients will progress to end-stage renal disease after a long time follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate kidney disease progression and risk factors on kidney survival in IgAN patients receiving steroids treatment.

Methods

Two hundred biopsy-proven IgAN patients who received corticosteroid therapy were enrolled and followed for a median period of 63.33 months. Risk factors on kidney survival were retrospectively investigated by the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Of the two hundred patients, twenty patients showed progression of renal impairment at the end of follow-up. The median and interquartile range values for initial serum creatinine were 89.2 and 68.08–121.35 µmol/L, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that relapse, non-remission, time-averaged eGFR (TA-eGFR), and time-averaged serum albumin (TA-ALB) were independently associated with the kidney progression. Those with TA-ALB levels <35 g/L and TA-eGFR levels <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were less likely to recover from kidney progression. Patients were more likely to show kidney function deterioration, when they had non-remission or relapse after corticosteroids treatment.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that relapse, non-remission, TA-eGFR, and TA-ALB could serve as independent predictors of long term prognosis of IgAN patients receiving corticosteroid therapy.

Keywords

IgA nephropathy Corticosteroids Risk factors Progression

Background

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most commonly occurring glomerulopathy and very likely progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide [14]. The pathogenesis of IgAN is still unclear, and no specific treatment is established [5]. Clinically, proteinuria is the most powerful predictor of poor kidney outcome, and reduction of proteinuria is associated with improved kidney survival [2, 3, 68]. Thus corticosteroids seem to be a good treatment, for its function of ameliorating proteinuria and protecting against kidney deterioration [911].

There has been widespread interest in corticosteroid therapy for IgAN. Studies have reported that prednisone can reduce urinary protein, protect kidney function, and delay the progress of IgAN [911]. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis suggest that patients with persistent proteinuria >1 g/day, despite 3–6 months of optimized supportive care [including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and blood pressure control], and GFR >50 mL/min per 1.73 m2, receive a 6-month course of corticosteroid therapy [12].

Beneficial effects from the short-term use of corticosteroids were reported in randomized control trial studies (RCTs) [13, 14]. However, in clinic, kidney function deterioration still occurred with a considerable amount of patients receiving prednisone. Moreover, the results of RCTs in adult patients are controversial, because of different outcomes consideration, small sample size or too short follow-up periods for a slowly progressing disease [1517].

Therefore we retrospectively investigated the influence of clinical and laboratory potential risk factors on kidney survival in 200 patients receiving steroids treatment with IgAN by the Cox proportional hazards model.

Methods

Study population

IgA nephropathy patients were eligible for the study when the following criteria were satisfied: having received steroids therapy; age >18 years; follow-up duration >36 months. The exclusion criteria were as follows: 24-h urinary protein excretion (UPE) >3.5 g/day; serum albumin (ALB) <30 g/L; pregnancy; systemic inflammation, such as Henoch–Schönlein purpura; chronic advanced liver disease; or atypical forms of IgAN [acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with macroscopic hematuria and crescentic IgAN]. Two hundred patients with primary IgAN, who had been biopsied between January 2005 and December 2010 and received steroids treatment at the Department of Nephrology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China, were included in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ren Ji Hospital, and all the participants gave written informed consent. All the kidney biopsy slides were reviewed by an experienced kidney pathologist.

Study design

The influence of clinical parameters, histological grade and treatment on kidney survival was retrospectively examined. Clinical parameters and laboratory data used for analyses were obtained at the time of diagnosis of IgAN and during the follow-up, including age, gender, baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), medical history, medications, follow-up duration, time to remission, time to endpoint, and responsiveness to treatment, hemoglobin (Hb) (measured by cyanide methemoglobin method), UPE (measured by sulfosalicylic acid assay), hematuria (uRBC/HP), serum creatinine (SCr) (measured by ammonia iminohydrolase-PAP), serum uric acid (UA) (measured by a biosensor based on urate oxidase- peroxidase coupled enzyme system), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (measured by urease coupling rate method), and ALB (measured by dye bromcresol green method).

As for the treatment, the effect of steroids therapy was examined. Any antihypertensive agent was permitted to control blood pressure during the follow-up. Using the modification of diet in kidney disease (MDRD) study equation calculated the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 180 × [SCr (mg/dL)]−1.154 × (age)−0.203 × (0.742 if female) [18]. Based on the kidney disease outcomes quality initiative (K/DOQI) practice guidelines, chronic kidney disease (CKD) was classified. The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was defined as the DBP plus one-third of the SBP. Time-averaged values such as the time-averaged UPE (TA-UPE), the time-averaged ALB (TA-ALB), the time-averaged SCr (TA-SCr), and the time-averaged eGFR (TA-eGFR) were obtained just as previously described [1921]. The kidney lesions were graded according to Lee’s classification at the time when the database was established [22].

After 6 months’ steroids therapy, the treatment response was evaluated. Complete remission (CR) was defined as a UPE <0.3 g/day, along with normalization of all biochemical findings and a lack of worsening of kidney function at the sixth month; partial remission (PR) was defined as at least a 50% reduction in UPE at the sixth month compared with baseline; no response (NR) was defined as a <50% reduction in UPE or an increase in UPE with or without kidney deterioration after receiving 6 months of therapy [23]. Relapse was defined as the reappearance of significant proteinuria, defined as >1.0 g/day and/or as a UPE increase of more than 50% [23, 24]. The end point of kidney survival was estimated by ESRD requiring hemodialysis therapy. The patients were classified with progression when their eGFR values decreased by more than 50% or when they reached ESRD during the follow-up period; the patients who exhibited stable kidney function, defined as an eGFR that remained within 50% of the initial value, were considered to be non-progression patients [25].

Most of the patients were treated according to the accepted standards at our center [12]. Long-term ACE-I or ARB treatment was recommended if there were no any contraindications. Corticosteroid was used in cases of massive proteinuria (>1 g/day). Corticosteroid regimens in patients with IgAN were 6-month regime of oral prednisone starting with 0.8–1 mg/kg/day for 2 months and then reduced by 0.2 mg/kg/day per month for the next 4 months. Other immunosuppressive agents were considered in patients with rapidly progressing kidney function decline.

Statistics

Analyses of the data were carried out using SPSS software (version 13: SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The normally distributed variables were expressed as the mean ± SD and the non-parametric variables were expressed as the median and range. Cox’s proportional hazards models for estimating the hazard ratios and the 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to identify the predictive factors for the development of IgAN progression. The multivariate models used a stepwise forward selection procedure based on a likelihood-ratio test with P > 0.10 for the removal and P < 0.05 for the entry of the variables. Kidney survival was estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method, and comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. Values of P less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study population

From 2005 to 2010, the data of a total of 200 patients with IgAN who had received steroids treatment were utilized in the analyses (Figure 1). All the subjects were Chinese. The baseline characteristics of the patients were shown in Table 1. The median follow-up period was 63.33 months, ranging from 43.60 to 100.67 months. Twenty patients showed progression of renal impairment after steroid therapy at the end of the follow-up.
Figure 1

A flow diagram of the study.

Table 1

Characteristics and clinical outcome in 200 IgAN patients receiving glucocorticoid medicine therapy

Characteristics

All included patients (N = 200)

Non-progression patients (N = 180)

Progression patients (N = 20)

Baseline

 Age (years)

36.99 ± 11.33

36.20 ± 10.42

43.93 ± 16.34

 Gender: female, n (%)

113 (56.5)

100 (55.60)

13 (64.30)

 SBP (mm Hg)

124.33 ± 17.11

124.08 ± 16.08

126.43 ± 24.99

 DBP (mm Hg)

81.08 ± 11.10

81.33 ± 10.89

78.93 ± 13.04

 SCr (µmol/L)

89.2 (68.08–121.35)

88.25 (67.35–117.70)

108.95 (84.80–139.40)

 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

70.98 (51.91–95.93)

72.84 (52.93–96.39)

53.36 (46.55–62.35)

 BUN (mmol/L)

5.98 (4.60–7.80)

5.90 (4.60–7.40)

6.78 (5.46–8.94)

 UA (µmol/L)

363.00 (311.65–427.50)

359.00 (310.00–422.00)

380.50 (347.00–436.00)

 Hb (g/L)

131.00 (120.00–143.00)

132.50 (120.00–144.00)

124.00 (121.00–132.00)

 ALB (g/L)

38.20 (34.10–40.80)

38.40 (34.60–41.10)

33.75 (30.20–38.60)

 UPE (g/day)

2.27 (1.35–3.41)

2.14 (1.34–3.14)

3.08 (2.27–3.84)

 uRBC/HP

26.20 (8.03–67.48)

24.10 (7.80–66.55)

31.00 (12.30–51.70)

 CKD stage, n (%)

  Stage I

67 (33.5)

63 (35.0)

4 (20.0)

  Stage II

60 (30.0)

57 (31.6)

3 (15.0)

  Stage III

68 (34.0)

55 (30.6)

13 (65.0)

  Stage IV–V

5 (2.5)

5 (2.8)

0 (0)

  FSGS, n (%)

112 (56.0)

  

 Renal biopsy Lee’s classification, n (%)

  Grade I

4 (2.1)

3 (1.7)

1 (5.0)

  Grade II

4 (2.1)

2 (1.1)

2 (10.0)

  Grade III

115 (57.4)

103 (57.2)

12 (60.0)

  Grade IV

68 (34.0)

65 (36.1)

3 (15.0)

  Grade V

9 (4.3)

7 (3.9)

2 (10.0)

Follow-up

 Remission, n (%)

160 (80)

152(84.4)

8 (40.0)

 Complete remission, n (%)

71 (35.4)

68 (37.8)

3 (15.0)

 Partial remission, n (%)

89 (44.6)

84 (46.7)

5 (25.0)

 Non-response, n (%)

40 (20.0)

28 (15.6)

12 (60.0)

 Relapse, n (%)

35 (17.3)

24 (13.3)

11 (55.0)

 Progression, n (%)

20 (10)

  

 Length of follow-up (months)

68.33 (43.60–100.67)

67.33 (42.93–98.77)

71.42 (38.37–92.83)

 ALB (g/L) at month 3

39.45 (35.80–43.03)

40.00 (35.90–43.30)

37.50 (35.00–40.00)

 ALB (g/L) at month 6

41.50 (37.50–44.15)

42.20 (38.10–45.00)

36.75 (35.20–40.00)

 TA-ALB (g/L)

40.93 (38.05–44.14)

42.48 (38.75–44.65)

37.28 (36.40–39.01)

 SCr (µmol/L) at month 3

88.10 (71.60–105.00)

87.30 (71.60–104.80)

101.55 (78.80–112.20)

 SCr (µmol/L) at month 6

80.00 (64.70–104.50)

79.00 (64.70–100.60)

97.85 (78.00–128.50)

 TA-SCr (µmol/L)

85.24 (64.81–106.75)

83.73 (64.71–103.46)

99.34 (77.36–111.91)

 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) at month 3

70.34 (56.97–98.72)

73.67 (58.04–98.72)

61.98 (48.87–81.43)

 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) at month 6

80.02 (58.05–103.28)

81.08 (62.52–103.38)

58.68 (52.57–82.39)

 TA-eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

76.93 (58.30–103.33)

80.61 (59.49–104.98)

58.74 (52.66–83.32)

 UPE (g/day) at month 3

0.79 (0.36–1.94)

0.73 (0.36–1.57)

1.26 (0.60–2.52)

 UPE (g/day) at month 6

0.63 (0.21–1.51)

0.60 (0.19–1.39)

1.36 (0.72–2.29)

 TA-UPE (g/day)

0.89 (0.51–1.75)

0.83 (0.49–1.69)

2.11 (0.82–2.36)

The mean age at biopsy was 36.99 ± 11.33 years. There were 87 men and 113 women. The systolic or diastolic blood pressure was 124.33 ± 17.11 mmHg and 81.08 ± 11.10 mmHg, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) values for initial SCr were 89.2 and 68.08–121.35 µmol/L, respectively. Sixty-seven patients were classified in CKD stage I, 60 in stage II, 68 in stage III and 5 in stage IV–V. The median and IQR values for the initial ALB were 38.20 and 34.10–40.80 g/L, respectively. The median and IQR values for the initial proteinuria were 2.27 and 1.35–3.41 g/day, respectively. One hundred and eighty-three patients were classified in histological Lee’s grade III–IV.

Characteristics of the study population during follow-up

The characteristics of the patients during the follow-up were shown in Table 1 as well, among which the median and IQR values for TA-ALB were 40.93 and 38.05–44.14 g/L, respectively. The median and IQR values for TA-eGFR were 76.93 and 58.30–103.33 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The median and IQR values for TA-UPE were 0.89 and 0.51–1.75 g/day, respectively.

Finally, a total of 160 patients with IgAN achieved remission within 6 months of initiation of steroids therapy. The remaining 40 patients (20.0%) exhibited a minimal response or NR. Additionally, 17.3% of the remission patients experienced relapse during the follow-up. During the median follow-up period of 63.33 months, 10.0% of the 200 included patients met the criteria of progression in this study.

Risk factors for the development of kidney progression in IgAN patients receiving steroids treatment

Both univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of the potential predictors on kidney progression in IgAN patients receiving steroids treatment. As shown in Table 2, age, baseline ALB, baseline eGFR, response to therapy (non-remission vs remission and relapse vs non-relapse), ALB at month 6,UPE at month 3,UPE at month 6, TA-ALB, TA-eGFR, and TA-UPE were notably associated with the risk of kidney progression in the univariate analyses.
Table 2

Factors that were found to affect the long-term prognosis in IgAN patients receiving glucocorticoid medicine therapy in the univariate COX regression analyses

Characteristics

Univariate analysis

HR

95% CI

P value

Baseline

 Age (years)

1.063

1.014–1.115

0.011

 ALB (g/L)

0.929

0.869–0.994

0.033

 eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

0.976

0.953–1.000

0.047

 uRBC/HP

  

0.975

 Renal biopsy Lee’s classification, n (%)

  Grade I

   

  Grade II

   

  Grade III

   

  Grade IV

  

0.596

Follow-up

 Length of follow-up (months)

  

0.684

 Non-remission (vs remission)

5.877

2.031–17.006

0.001

 Relapse (vs non-relapse)

12.602

1.443–110.058

0.022

 ALB g/L at month 6

0.844

0.761–0.935

0.001

 UPE at month 3 (g/day)

1.000

1.000–1.001

0.016

 UPE at month 6 (g/day)

1.000

1.000-1.001

0.043

 uRBC/HP at month 3

  

0.961

 uRBC/HP at month 6

  

0.574

 TA-ALB (g/L)

0.778

0.663–0.913

0.002

 TA-eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

0.978

0.957–1.000

0.048

 TA-UPE (g/day)

1.000

1.000–1.001

0.046

Those factors that were significantly correlated with progression on the basis of univariate analyses were further evaluated by the multivariate analyses. Three multivariate Cox regression models were created, as shown in Table 3. In model 1, higher TA-ALB and higher TA-eGFR reduced the risk of occurring kidney function deterioration independently. As for the steroids treatment, hazard ratio (HR) for kidney progression of non-remission patients after steroids therapy increased significantly compared to the remission group (HR = 5.877, 95% CI = 2.031–17.006, P = 0.001). These findings were still observed in model 2 after adjusting for the effects of age, gender, eGFR, ALB, and UPE (HR = 4.995, 95% CI = 1.436–17.365, p = 0.011). In the adjusted model, individuals who experienced relapse had a greater risk of kidney progression compared with non-relapse individuals (HR = 12.629, 95% CI = 1.446–110.320, p = 0.021) (Table 3, model 3).
Table 3

Factors that were found to affect the long-term prognosis in IgAN patients receiving glucocorticoid medicine therapy in the multivariate COX regression analyses

Characteristics

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

95% CI

P value

HR

95% CI

P value

Model 1 (n = 200)

 Age (years)

1.063

1.014–1.115

0.011

  

0.20

 Gender

  

0.48

  

0.42

 TA-eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

0.978

0.957–1.000

0.048

0.971

0.945–0.998

0.03

 TA-ALB (g/L)

0.778

0.663–0.913

0.002

0.772

0.636–0.937

0.008

 UPE at month 3 (g/day)

1.000

1.000–1.001

0.016

  

0.40

Model 2 (n = 200)

 Age (years)

1.063

1.014–1.115

0.011

  

0.25

 Gender

  

0.48

  

0.32

 Non-remission (vs remission)

5.877

2.031–17.006

0.001

4.995

1.436–17.365

0.011

 TA-eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

0.978

0.957–1.000

0.048

0.962

0.933–0.992

0.013

 TA-ALB (g/L)

0.778

0.663–0.913

0.002

0.806

0.673–0.966

0.019

 UPE at month 3 (g/day)

1.000

1.000–1.001

0.016

  

0.99

Model 3 (n = 160)

 Age (years)

1.063

1.014–1.115

0.011

  

0.52

 Gender

  

0.48

  

0.13

 Relapse (vs non-relapse)

12.602

1.443–110.058

0.022

12.629

1.446–110.32

0.021

 TA-eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

0.978

0.957–1.000

0.048

  

0.06

 TA-ALB (g/L)

0.778

0.663–0.913

0.002

  

0. 12

 UPE at month 3 (g/day)

1.000

1.000–1.001

0.016

  

0.28

Based on the Kaplan–Meier analyses, the actual kidney survival according to the potential risk factors were plotted in Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5. As illustrated in Figure 2, remission patients (CR or PR patients) had significantly longer progression-free times compared with the non-remission patients (P < 0.05). The patients who experienced relapse after achieving remission, had an unfavorable survival rate of non-progression (Figure 3). The relationship between the TA-ALB values and kidney outcomes was dramatically altered at levels of 40 and 35 g/L. And the relationship between the TA-eGFR levels and kidney outcomes was altered at levels of 90 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Figures 45).
Figure 2

Progression-free survival analysis according to remission.

Figure 3

Progression-free survival analysis according to relapse.

Figure 4

Progression-free survival analysis according to TA-eGFR.

Figure 5

Progression-free survival analysis according to TA-ALB.

Discussion

Long-term prognosis of IgAN was highly variable: ESRD occurred in 5–25% of cases within 10 years [2, 3, 26] and in 25–50% within 20 years [3]. There were a variety of studies having confirmed the effect of steroids treatment on amelioration of the clinical course of IgAN [14, 15]. In clinical practice, beneficial effects from the short-term use of corticosteroids in the small sample of patients were clear and definite. However, the long-term efficacy of steroids therapy in IgAN had barely been testified,and a number of IgAN patients progressed to ESRD even having received steroids therapy. RCT studies have confirmed that 50% increase in plasma creatinine from baseline occurred in about 10% of IgAN patients within 4–5 years of starting steroids treatment [10, 27, 28]. Similarly, kidney progression occurred in 20/200 (10%) included patients of this study. Thus the aim of this study was to identify risk factors for kidney function deterioration in a cohort of IgAN patients receiving steroids treatment.

Among the clinical and laboratory indicators of the disease, persistent and severe proteinuria was identified as the most important predictor of a poor outcome [2, 3, 68] and that its reduction correlates with better kidney function. A long-term RCT of 86 adult IgAN patients evaluating corticosteroids effectiveness in IgA nephropathy showed that, in addition to steroids, a reduction in proteinuria levels after 6 months, and no increase in proteinuria during follow-up all were independent predictors of a beneficial outcome [13].

Results of this study demonstrated that proteinuria at month 3 and month 6 was a strong related factor of kidney function decline in patients with IgAN according to univariate analysis. After a multivariate Cox analysis, we were unable to provide clear evidence that proteinuria was associated with kidney outcomes. This parameter did not independently contribute to the risk in the multivariate models.

Instead, the adjusted multivariate Cox analysis model revealed that non-remission state was associated with a 3.995 folds of increase in the risk of kidney progression, confirming the importance of proteinuria reduction in retarding IgAN progression. A recent multi-center RCT assessing whether the combination of prednisone and ramipril was more effective than ramipril alone in patients with proteinuric IgAN, revealed that a decrease in 24-h proteinuria <1 g was observed in 36/48 (75.0%) patients of the combination therapy group and in 33/49 (67.3%) patients of the monotherapy group at 6 months of follow-up [14]. In this study, CR and PR were achieved in 71 (35.4%) and 89 (44.6%) patients, respectively. The remaining 20.0% patients presented persistent proteinuria.

Relapse of proteinuria was commonly seen in IgAN patients. In this study, 28/160 (17.3%) patients appeared relapse after achieving remission, and individuals who experienced relapse had a significantly increased risk of kidney progression after adjusting for the effects of age, gender, eGFR, ALB, and UPE. This result verified previous viewpoint as well [13].

Serum albumin was a biomarker of nutritional status and inflammation [29]. In our previous study, we had demonstrated that the TA-ALB value was an independent predictor of kidney progression in IgAN patients who had achieved remission after treatment [19]. In the present study, baseline ALB, ALB at month 6 and TA-ALB correlated with kidney function decline in patients receiving steroids therapy by the univariate analysis. This result was in accordance with findings observed across multiple cohorts [20, 3032].

Damaged baseline eGFR was a traditional risk factor for kidney progression. Similar to prior reports [3, 20, 3335], we confirmed that the baseline eGFR and TA-eGFR were associated with kidney progression among IgAN patients receiving steroids treatment. Uncontrolled hypertension during follow-up is associated with greater proteinuria and predicts a faster GFR decline. Patients included in our study were monitored closely and under strict blood pressure control. Most patients had been kept within the normal blood pressure range after ACEIs/ARBs treatment during long term follow-up. Some studies had identified that elder patients would progressed to ESRD more promptly [2, 3638]. Our multivariate analysis also suggested that older age at diagnosis was a strong predictor of kidney progression among patients having received steroids therapy.

This is a study to use a cohort of IgAN patients having received steroids treatment after diagnose to assess kidney outcomes and the related risk factors for kidney progression. Our study may help explain the reason of a large number of patients receiving prednisone still progressed to ESRD. This study is unique in that it identified predictors for clinical outcomes among a pool of IgAN patients receiving steroids therapy. The strengths of this study also included a relative large number of IgAN patients, a uniform therapy strategy, and the robust database. Using this robust database, we examined the impact that clinical patterns have on progression to ESRD. Several shortcomings of this study existed. This study was a retrospective study and most of the patients recruited came from the southern regions of China. Therefore, the analyses had an inherent selection bias and limited representation. Thus, more studies are required to evaluate the progression of IgAN in patients under steroids treatment regimen in the future.

Conclusions

In summary, our data clearly showed that relapse, non-remission, TA-eGFR, and TA-ALB were associated with renal outcomes. Furthermore, these characteristics could serve as independent predictors of long term prognosis of IgAN patients receiving corticosteroid therapy.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

We thank all of the doctors at the Nephrology Department of Ren Ji Hospital in Shanghai, China for their work. Research idea and study design: SM, YY and QW; data acquisition: YY, WZ, ZN, QW, LC, XC, MZ, YX, LT, and CQ; data analysis: SM, ZN and YY; supervision or mentation: SM and ZN; manuscript writing: SM, YY and QW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the doctors at the Nephrology Department of Ren Ji Hospital in Shanghai, China for their work. This study was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program No. 2012CB517600 (No. 2012CB517602). The study was also sponsored by HongKong, Macao and Taiwan Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2014DFT30090), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81102700, 81373865) as well as by a Grant (12401906400, 13401906100 and 14140903200) from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China. Program ZYSNXD012-RC-ZXY017 from the Shanghai Health Bureau and grant ZZjdyx13049 from Shanghai municipal education committee were also included. We thank all of the doctors at the Nephrology Department of Ren Ji Hospital in Shanghai, China for their work. The study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81102700,81373865), Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan S&T Cooperation Program of China (2014DFT30090), as well as by grants (12401906400 and 13401906100) from the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality, China. This study was also supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China 973 Program No. 2012CB517600 (No. 2012CB517602). Program ZYSNXD012-RC-ZXY017 from the Shanghai Health Bureau and grant ZZjdyx3049 from the Shanghai Municipal Education Committee were also included.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper. The results presented in this paper have not been published previously in whole or part.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nephrology, Molecular Cell Lab for Kidney Disease, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

References

  1. Beukhof JR, Kardaun O, Schaafsma W, Poortema K, Donker AJ, Hoedemaeker PJ et al (1986) Toward individual prognosis of IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int 29(2):549–556PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. D’Amico G (2000) Natural history of idiopathic IgA nephropathy: role of clinical and histological prognostic factors. Am J Kidney Dis 36(2):227–237PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Koyama A, Igarashi M, Kobayashi M (1997) Natural history and risk factors for immunoglobulin A nephropathy in Japan. Research Group on Progressive Renal Diseases. Am J Kidney Dis 29(4):526–532PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Nicholls KM, Fairley KF, Dowling JP, Kincaid-Smith P (1984) The clinical course of mesangial IgA associated nephropathy in adults. Q J Med 53(210):227–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Strippoli GF, Manno C, Schena FP (2003) An “evidence-based” survey of therapeutic options for IgA nephropathy: assessment and criticism. Am J Kidney Dis 41(6):1129–1139PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartosik LP, Lajoie G, Sugar L, Cattran DC (2001) Predicting progression in IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 38(4):728–735PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Syrjanen J, Mustonen J, Pasternack A (2000) Hypertriglyceridaemia and hyperuricaemia are risk factors for progression of IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl 15(1):34–42View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Daniel L, Saingra Y, Giorgi R, Bouvier C, Pellissier JF, Berland Y (2000) Tubular lesions determine prognosis of IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 35(1):13–20PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lv J, Zhang H, Chen Y, Li G, Jiang L, Singh AK et al (2009) Combination therapy of prednisone and ACE inhibitor versus ACE-inhibitor therapy alone in patients with IgA nephropathy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 53(1):26–32PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pozzi C, Andrulli S, Pani A, Scaini P, Del Vecchio L, Fogazzi G et al (2010) Addition of azathioprine to corticosteroids does not benefit patients with IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 21(10):1783–1790PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kawamura T, Yoshimura M, Miyazaki Y, Okamoto H, Kimura K, Hirano K et al (2014) A multicenter randomized controlled trial of tonsillectomy combined with steroid pulse therapy in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl 29(8):1546–1553View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. KDIGO Working Group (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl 2:209–217View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pozzi C, Andrulli S, Del Vecchio L, Melis P, Fogazzi GB, Altieri P et al (2004) Corticosteroid effectiveness in IgA nephropathy: long-term results of a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 15(1):157–163PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Manno C, Torres DD, Rossini M, Pesce F, Schena FP (2009) Randomized controlled clinical trial of corticosteroids plus ACE-inhibitors with long-term follow-up in proteinuric IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl 24(12):3694–3701View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pozzi C, Bolasco PG, Fogazzi GB, Andrulli S, Altieri P, Ponticelli C et al (1999) Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 353(9156):883–887PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shoji T, Nakanishi I, Suzuki A, Hayashi T, Togawa M, Okada N et al (2000) Early treatment with corticosteroids ameliorates proteinuria, proliferative lesions, and mesangial phenotypic modulation in adult diffuse proliferative IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 35(2):194–201PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Katafuchi R, Ikeda K, Mizumasa T, Tanaka H, Ando T, Yanase T et al (2003) Controlled, prospective trial of steroid treatment in IgA nephropathy: a limitation of low-dose prednisolone therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 41(5):972–983PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI et al (2009) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150(9):604–612PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ni Z, Yuan Y, Wang Q, Cao L, Che X, Zhang M et al (2014) Time-averaged albumin predicts the long-term prognosis of IgA nephropathy patients who achieved remission. J Transl Med 12:194PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Le W, Liang S, Hu Y, Deng K, Bao H, Zeng C et al (2012) Long-term renal survival and related risk factors in patients with IgA nephropathy: results from a cohort of 1155 cases in a Chinese adult population. Nephrol Dial Transpl 27(4):1479–1485View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Reich HN, Troyanov S, Scholey JW, Cattran DC, Toronto Glomerulonephritis Registry (2007) Remission of proteinuria improves prognosis in IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 18(12):3177–3183PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee HS, Lee MS, Lee SM, Lee SY, Lee ES, Lee EY et al (2005) Histological grading of IgA nephropathy predicting renal outcome: revisiting H. S. Lee’s glomerular grading system. Nephrol Dial Transpl 20(2):342–348View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim JK, Kim JH, Lee SC, Kang EW, Chang TI, Moon SJ et al (2012) Clinical features and outcomes of IgA nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7(3):427–436PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Moon SJ, Park HS, Kwok SK, Ju J, Choi BS, Park KS et al (2013) Predictors of renal relapse in Korean patients with lupus nephritis who achieved remission six months following induction therapy. Lupus 22(5):527–537PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ballardie FW, Roberts IS (2002) Controlled prospective trial of prednisolone and cytotoxics in progressive IgA nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(1):142–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Alamartine E, Sabatier JC, Guerin C, Berliet JM, Berthoux F (1991) Prognostic factors in mesangial IgA glomerulonephritis: an extensive study with univariate and multivariate analyses. Am J Kidney Dis 18(1):12–19PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Harada K, Akai Y, Yamaguchi Y, Kimura K, Nishitani Y, Nakatani K et al (2008) Prediction of corticosteroid responsiveness based on fibroblast-specific protein 1 (FSP1) in patients with IgA nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl 23(10):3152–3159View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirano K, Kawamura T, Tsuboi N, Okonogi H, Miyazaki Y, Ikeda M et al (2013) The predictive value of attenuated proteinuria at 1 year after steroid therapy for renal survival in patients with IgA nephropathy. Clin Exp Nephrol 17(4):555–562PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. De Feo P, Horber FF, Haymond MW (1992) Meal stimulation of albumin synthesis: a significant contributor to whole body protein synthesis in humans. Am J Physiol 263(4 Pt 1):E794–E799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keane WF, Zhang Z, Lyle PA, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Grunfeld JP et al (2006) Risk scores for predicting outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy: the RENAAL study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1(4):761–767PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Tangri N, Stevens LA, Griffith J, Tighiouart H, Djurdjev O, Naimark D et al (2011) A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA 305(15):1553–1559PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Staples AO, Greenbaum LA, Smith JM, Gipson DS, Filler G, Warady BA et al (2010) Association between clinical risk factors and progression of chronic kidney disease in children. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 5(12):2172–2179PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Li X, Liu Y, Lv J, Shi S, Liu L, Chen Y et al (2014) Progression of IgA nephropathy under current therapy regimen in a Chinese population. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 9(3):484–489PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Xie J, Kiryluk K, Wang W, Wang Z, Guo S, Shen P et al (2012) Predicting progression of IgA nephropathy: new clinical progression risk score. PLoS One 7(6):e38904PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mackinnon B, Fraser EP, Cattran DC, Fox JG, Geddes CC (2008) Validation of the Toronto formula to predict progression in IgA nephropathy. Nephron Clin Pract 109(3):c148–c153PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Frimat L, Hestin D, Aymard B, Mayeux D, Renoult E, Kessler M (1996) IgA nephropathy in patients over 50 years of age: a multicentre, prospective study. Nephrol Dial Transpl 11(6):1043–1047View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Sugiyama H, Sato H, Ueda Y, Yokoyama H (2013) Progressive renal diseases: recent advances in diagnosis and treatments. Topics: I. diagnosis; 2. epidemiology of renal disease: Japan Renal Biopsy Registry and Japan Kidney Disease Registry. Nihon Naika Gakkai Zasshi 102(5):1083–1091PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Barbour SJ, Cattran DC, Kim SJ, Levin A, Wald R, Hladunewich MA et al (2013) Individuals of Pacific Asian origin with IgA nephropathy have an increased risk of progression to end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 84(5):1017–1024PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yuan et al. 2015

Advertisement