- Open Access
A novel method of modifying immune responses by vaccination with lipiodol-siRNA mixtures
- Thomas E Ichim†1Email author,
- Igor A Popov†2,
- Neil H Riordan1,
- Hamid Izadi1,
- Zaohui Zhong3,
- Li Yijian3,
- Salman Sher4 and
- Eugenia K Oleinik5
© Ichim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 21 October 2005
Accepted: 03 January 2006
Published: 03 January 2006
The dendritic cell (DC) possesses the ability to stimulate both T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 responses depending on activation stimuli. Although it is known that chemically or genetically modified DC can be used therapeutically to steer immune responses towards either Th1 or Th2, cellular therapy with ex vivo manipulated DC is clinically difficult. Here we demonstrate a novel method of switching immune responses from Th1 to Th2 through in vivo immune modulation by administration of siRNA. We demonstrate that siRNA targeting of the IL-12p35 gene leads to a Th2 bias in vitro through an IL-10 dependent mechanism. In vivo administration of siRNA admixed with the oil-based contrast agent lipiodol in the presence of antigen and adjuvant induced a deviation in recall response to reduced production of IFN-γ and augmented IL-4 response using either KLH or ovalbumin. This simple method of in vivo modification of immune response possesses therapeutic potential in Th1-mediated diseases such as multiple sclerosis and autoimmune diabetes.
It is known that the immune response can be polarized into two broad subsets based on cytokine secretion of the T helper cells. T helper-1 cells (Th1) responses are associated with anti-viral and anti-cancer immune reactions and are characterized by high secretion of the cytokine IFN-γ and IL-2 . In contrast, Th2 responses are effective for clearing parasitic infections such as schistosoma mansoni and are identified by high secretion of IL-4 and IL-13 . In various human diseases a pathological polarization of the immune responses either to Th1 or Th2 is known to occur. For example, autoimmune diseases such as diabetes , multiple sclerosis , or arthritis , are associated with overproduction of Th1 cytokines. The causative role of these cytokines is noted by amelioration of animal models of autoimmune disease through treatment with inhibitors of such cytokines, such as antibodies or soluble receptors; however, clinical utilization is often impeded by systemic, non-desired side effects. Therefore a desired method of treating autoimmune diseases associated with Th1-hyperactivities would be targeting the actual initiating event that triggers such immune reactions.
It is known that naïve CD4+ T helper cells (Th0) are programmed by the antigen presenting cell in order to become polarized into either the Th1 or Th2 phenotype . More recent studies have demonstrated that dendritic cells (DC) play a key role in recognizing the exogenous pathogens, and making the decision of whether a Th1 or Th2 response is needed . For example, parasites contain distinct chemical signatures that are recognized by specialized toll-like receptors (TLR) on DC, which instruct the DC to promote the appropriate response. In the case of schistosomiasis, the schistosomal egg antigen (SEA) is known to bind to TLR-2 on DC, and stimulate production of IL-13, which in turn shifts the Th0 cell into a Th2 cells [8, 9]. Conversely, Gram-negative bacteria contain lipopolysaccaride (LPS), which activates TLR-4, leading to production of IL-12 by the DC, which then stimulates Th1 differentiation . Since it is established that Th1 immunity is essential for clearance of many Gram-negative bacteria, it appears that the DC plays a "central cognitive" role in guiding the immune response. Conversely, manipulation of this cell type would allow us to selectively modulate immune responses to either Th1 or Th2. Since DC can be pulsed with antigen, the manipulation of antigen-pulsed DC would allow for selective alterations of immunity in an antigen-specific manner. Although this has been performed in animal models of autoimmunity [11–15], the clinical utilization is hampered by the need for ex vivo cellular manipulation, which is expensive and difficult.
RNA interference (RNAi) is the cellular defense mechanism by which a double-stranded RNA specifically silences mRNA transcripts with strict homology to the double strand . The silencing effect of exogenous double-stranded RNA is very potent in that it can mediate gene-silencing even at a concentration of 1–3 double strands per cell . In light of this potency and selectivity, the induction of RNAi in DC would allow for silencing of genes that stimulate either Th1 or Th2. Since it is known that inhibition of Th1 cytokines in DC results in the stimulation of Th2 immunity and vice versa, we hypothesize that silencing of IL-12 would result in DC with a propensity of stimulating Th2 immune responses.
While we and others have been able to modify immunological parameters of DC through silencing IL-10 , IL-12p35 , IL-12p40 , T-bet  and SOCS1 , a method of easily inducing immune modulation in vivo is lacking. In this study we induce an "in vivo genetic modification", presumably through DC using an immobilizing agent (CFA), a transfection associated agent (lipidiol) and antigen. We demonstrate inhibition of Th1 and upregulation of Th2 responses using this simple immunization protocol.
Materials and methods
Female C57/BL6 and BALB/c mice (The Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME), 5 wk of age, were kept in filter-top cages at the Animal Care and Veterinary Services Facility, the University of Western Ontario according to the Canadian Council for Animal Care Guidelines. Mice were fed by food and water ad libitum and allowed to settle for 2 wk before initiation of experimentations.
DC generation and siRNA transfection
At Day 0, bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibias of C57/BL6 mice, washed and cultured in 6-well plates (Corning, NY) at 4 × 106 cells/well in 4 ml of complete medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg of streptomycin, 50 μM 2-ME, and 10% FCS (all from Life Technologies, Ontario, Canada) supplemented with recombinant GM-CSF (10 ng/ml; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and recombinant mouse IL-4 (10 ng/ml; PeproTech). All cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% humidified CO2. Non-adherent cells were removed after 48 h of culture (Day 2) and fresh medium was added. After 7 days of culture, >90% of the cells expressed the characteristic DC-specific marker CD11c as determined by FACS. DC were washed and plated in 24-well plates at a concentration of 2 × 105 cells/well in 400 μl of serum-free RPMI 1640. Transfection with GenePorter, lipiodol, or naked siRNA was performed as described below on day 7 of culture.
siRNA synthesis and transfection
siRNA sequences were selected according to the method previously used by us . siRNA specific for IL-12p35 (AACCUGCUGAAGACCACAGAU) or mismatched (mixed) control sequence (AACTGCCAGATGGATGGTGAC) were synthesized and annealed by the manufacturer (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) and added at a concentration of 60pMol to DC cultures. For transfection, 3 μl of 20 μM annealed siRNA were incubated with 3 μl of GenePorter (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA) or lipiodol (Ultra-Fluide™ Laboratoire Guerbet, France) in a volume of 100 μl of RPMI 1640 (serum free) at room temperature for 30 min. This was then added to 400 μl of DC cell culture as described above. Mock controls were transfected with 3 μl of GenePorter alone. For naked siRNA, addition of the same concentration of siRNA was performed and procedures were repeated in an identical manner with the exception of addition of transfection reagent. After 4 h of incubation, an equal volume of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 20% FCS was added to the cells. Twenty-four hours later, transfected DC were washed and used for subsequent experiments. DC activation was performed in 24-well plates by stimulation with LPS (10 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) plus TNF- (10 ng/ml; PeproTech) for 24 hours.
Phenotypic analysis of DC was performed using flow cytometry on a FACScan (Becton Dickninson, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). The cells were stained with FITC-conjugated mAb against surface markers associated with DC maturation: anti-mouse CD11c, anti-mouse CD40, anti-mouse CD80, and anti-mouse CD86 (Cedarlane Laboratories, Mississauga, ON). Ig of the same isotype were used as controls. Annexin V and propidium iodine analysis for apoptosis, necrosis was performed using the Apotag kit (Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby Ontario, Canada).
Mixed lymphocyte reaction
C57/BL6 DC after transfection were irradiated (3,000 rad) and seeded in triplicate at various concentrations in a flat-bottom 96-well plate (Corning) for use as stimulator cells. Splenic T cells from BALB/c mice were isolated by gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Quebec) and T cell nylon wool column purification, and added as responders (5 × 105 cells/well). The mixed lymphocytes were cultured at 37°C for 72 h in 200 μl of RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, and 100 μg/ml of streptomycin and pulsed with 1 μCi/well of 3H-labelled thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for the last 16 h of culture. Cells were harvested onto glass fiber filters, and the radioactivity incorporated was quatitated using a Wallac Betaplate liquid scintillation counter (Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Results were expressed as the mean counts per min of triplicate cultures ± SEM. In some experiments anti-IL-10 (JES5 2A5, Pharmingen) or isotype control antibody were added for the duration of the MLR at a concentration of 5 ug/ml.
Immunization with Ag/Lipiodol mixture
C57/BL6 mice were immunized intradermally at the interior side of both hind legs with 100 μl of KLH or ovalbumin (1 μg/μl) emulsified in CFA (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) in the presence or absence of 10 nMol siRNA and 10% lipiodol. After 14 days mice were sacrificed and T cells extracted as described above.
Proliferative recall responses to KLH and ovalbumin in immunized mice were assessed by sacrificing C57/BL6 mice 14 days after immunization with antigen-loaded DC. T cells were purified from suspensions of lymph nodes using CD4+ T cell column (R&D Systems) after washing in PBS. Purified T cells were cultured in 96 well plates with irradiated syngeneic splenocytes in triplicate and mixed with serial dilutions of KLH or OVA at concentrations ranging from 0–10 ug/ml. Following a 72-h incubation, 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham) was added to each well for 16 h. Using an automated cell harvester, the cells were collected onto glass microfiber filter, and the radioactive labeling incorporation was measured by a Wallac Betaplate liquid scintillation counter.
The supernatants from recall response T cell cultures or MLR were harvested and assessed for DC cytokines (IL-12p70, IL-10) and T cell cytokines (IFN-, IL-4) by ELISA. Cytokine-specific ELISA (Endogen, Rockford, IL) was used for detecting cytokine concentrations in culture supernatants according to the manufacturer's instructions using a Benchmark Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
Lipiodol enhances transfection of functional siRNA into DC
We have previously demonstrated that transfection of DC with siRNA specific for the p35 component of IL-12 induces potent gene specific silencing at the mRNA transcript level as demonstrated by RT-PCR and subsequently reduced expression of the IL-12 p70 heterodimer as witnessed by ELISA protein . Furthermore, we and others have reported that siRNA can be endocytosed into dendritic cells (DC) and other cell types in absence of transfection reagent both in vitro and in vivo [23–25]. Since lipiodol is a clinically used contrast agent with ability to mediate transfection of siRNA in vivo, we chose to investigate whether lipiodol can be used to increase uptake of siRNA in DC in using an in vitro system.
Immune modulation by lipiodol/siRNA
Th1 > Th2 shift is associated with IL-10 production
Surface molecules (MFI)
571.7 (± 23)
1194 (± 125)
29.5 (± 1.5)
567.3 (± 21)
1251 (± 173)
28.6 (± 1.3)
572.5 (± 10)
1365 (± 157)
29.7 (± 1.3)
559.6 (± 33)
1201 (± 193)
30.1 (± 0.9)
siRNA + Lipiodol
577.3 (± 15)
1195 (± 103)
30.4 (± 1.3)
1962.9 (± 136)
2707.1 (± 576)
140.5 (± 35.4)
1933.2 (± 324)
3031.6 (± 489)
170.3 (± 26.9)
1905.7 (± 351)
2759.9 (± 392)
167.2 (± 46.9)
siRNA + Lipiodol
2050.8 (± 119)
3051.1 (± 335)
153.3 (± 36.7)
Post-MLR + Anti-IL10
3529 (± 302)
4862 (± 583)
236.0 (± 47.3)
3442 (± 247)
4777 (± 773)
242.8 (± 58.9)
3723 (± 453)
4863 (± 669)
237.4 (± 43.5)
siRNA + Lipiodol
3985 (± 339)
4957 (± 501)
254.3 (± 49.3)
Lipiodol/siRNA induces Th1>Th2 shift in vivo
Lipiodol (trade name Ultra-Fluide™) is an iodized poppy seed oil fatty acid ethylester commonly used as contrast media for radiography . Commonly, lipiodol alone or with chemotherapy is administered to patients with hepatic cell carcinoma for embolization of tumor-feeding arteries, as well as localized delivery of chemotherapy . The finding that lipiodol selectively is uptaken by endothelial cells through pinocytosis , combined with the fact that it has previously been used for siRNA delivery in vivo  stimulated us to question whether lipiodol can be used as a carrier for siRNA. We observed that although lipiodol was not as effective as GenePorter for in vitro transfection and gene silencing, the inhibitory effects where several fold more potent than the administration of naked siRNA.
We therefore continued to seek whether lipiodol transfer of siRNA can still mediate the immune modulatory effects previously reported by us in terms of switching Th1 to Th2 responses . Although this was the case, we also observed that the switch was dependent on IL-10 production. This is somewhat interesting since although IL-10 is a Th2 cytokine, secretion of IL-10 has also been demonstrated to stimulate CD8 proliferation , and even to suppress atopy , a manifestation of classical Th2 responses. In this study our data supports a prototypic role of IL-10 secreted by DC in stimulation of IL-4 and IFN-γ production. We are however aware that assessment of other Th1/Th2 associated factors are needed to conclusively demonstrate a Th2 switch was occurring. Additionally, although in our hands, similar culture situations stimulate IL-10 production primarily by DC, we can not rule out the production of IL-10 by T cells. Future studies involve looking at T cell transcription factors such as T-bet and GATA-3, associated with Th1 and Th2 cells, respectively .
While we were able to induce in vivo immune modulation through administration of the lipiodol/siRNA mixture, we did not demonstrate that in vivo the DC were indeed the culprits for immune modulation. As previously stated, lipiodol in vivo is pinocytosed by endothelial cells , and most likely by other cells such as monocytes and macrophages. Indeed both endothelial cells, and macrophages have been demonstrated to possess immune modulatory activity. For example, antigen presentation by unmanipulated endothelium is known to mediate tolerance in various situations [47, 48]. Indeed we conceived that the lipiodol itself may be inducing immune modulation due to specific targeting of antigen to endothelial presentation, however this was not the case since lipiodol together with antigen, or together with antigen and mixed siRNA did not mediate immune modulation. However, the fact that the endothelial cells themselves are protolerogenic may allow for synergy with the tolerogenic siRNA administered. The involvement of macrophages in the immune modulation witnessed is another possibility. Indeed, macrophages have been reported to acquire an M1/M2 phenotype similar to Th1/Th2 . Preliminary experiments have indicated refractoriness to IL-12 production after LPS/TNF stimulation of CD11c DC derived from draining lymph nodes 2–3 days after administration of lipiodol/siRNA, however this will be the subject of an upcoming paper.
Regardless of the cellular mechanisms involved, the ability to immune modulate through administration of a "vaccine composition" with siRNA opens a whole world of novel possibilities both therapeutic and experiments. Through alleviating the need for ex vivo cellular processing, simple siRNA based vaccines can be developed for a variety of disease indications where a Th switch is desired. In terms of clinical applicability, the addition of siRNA for embolization of tumors would allow for induction of immune stimulation at the site of tissue necrosis. This would permit induction of immune responses to antigens released during the embolization procedure. Indeed similar approach used by Adema et al has demonstrated successful induction of immunity through tissue damage combined with immune stimulation .
In conclusion, we demonstrate that siRNA can be administered through a clinically useful method, thus opening the possibilities of genetic immune modulation without the use of viruses or ex vivo cellular manipulation.
- Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, Coffman RL: Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol. 1986, 136: 2348-2357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mosmann TR, Coffman RL: TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu Rev Immunol. 1989, 7: 145-173. 10.1146/annurev.iy.07.040189.001045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh VK, Mehrotra S, Agarwal SS: The paradigm of Th1 and Th2 cytokines: its relevance to autoimmunity and allergy. Immunol Res. 1999, 20: 147-161.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sospedra M, Martin R: Immunology of Multiple Sclerosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004Google Scholar
- Miossec P, van den Berg W: Th1/Th2 cytokine balance in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40: 2105-2115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dabbagh K, Lewis DB: Toll-like receptors and T-helper-1/T-helper-2 responses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003, 16: 199-204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Steinman RM: The control of immunity and tolerance by dendritic cell. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2003, 51: 59-60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal S, Agrawal A, Doughty B, Gerwitz A, Blenis J, Van Dyke T, Pulendran B: Cutting edge: different Toll-like receptor agonists instruct dendritic cells to induce distinct Th responses via differential modulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Fos. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 4984-4989.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Redecke V, Hacker H, Datta SK, Fermin A, Pitha PM, Broide DH, Raz E: Cutting edge: activation of Toll-like receptor 2 induces a Th2 immune response and promotes experimental asthma. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 2739-2743.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazzoni A, Segal DM: Controlling the Toll road to dendritic cell polarization. J Leukoc Biol. 2004, 75: 721-730. 10.1189/jlb.1003482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papaccio G, Nicoletti F, Pisanti FA, Bendtzen K, Galdieri M: Prevention of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice by transferring in vitro antigen-pulsed syngeneic dendritic cells. Endocrinology. 2000, 141: 1500-1505. 10.1210/en.141.4.1500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Feili-Hariri M, Dong X, Alber SM, Watkins SC, Salter RD, Morel PA: Immunotherapy of NOD mice with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 2300-2308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morita Y, Yang J, Gupta R, Shimizu K, Shelden EA, Endres J, Mule JJ, McDonagh KT, Fox DA: Dendritic cells genetically engineered to express IL-4 inhibit murine collagen-induced arthritis. J Clin Invest. 2001, 107: 1275-1284.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Link H, Huang YM, Masterman T, Xiao BG: Vaccination with autologous dendritic cells: from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis to multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol. 2001, 114: 1-7. 10.1016/S0165-5728(01)00247-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang JS, Xu LY, Huang YM, Van Der Meide PH, Link H, Xiao BG: Adherent dendritic cells expressing high levels of interleukin-10 and low levels of interleukin-12 induce antigen-specific tolerance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunology. 2000, 101: 397-403. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2000.00115.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang G: siRNA and miRNA: an insight into RISCs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2005, 30: 106-114. 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T: Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001, 411: 494-498. 10.1038/35078107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu G, Ng H, Akasaki Y, Yuan X, Ehtesham M, Yin D, Black KL, Yu JS: Small interference RNA modulation of IL-10 in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells enhances the Th1 response. Eur J Immunol. 2004, 34: 1680-1687. 10.1002/eji.200425081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill JA, Ichim TE, Kusznieruk KP, Li M, Huang X, Yan X, Zhong R, Cairns E, Bell DA, Min WP: Immune modulation by silencing IL-12 production in dendritic cells using small interfering RNA. J Immunol. 2003, 171: 691-696.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Flynn MA, Casey DG, Todryk SM, Mahon BP: Efficient delivery of small interfering RNA for inhibition of IL-12p40 expression in vivo. J Inflamm (Lond). 2004, 1: 4-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lovett-Racke AE, Rocchini AE, Choy J, Northrop SC, Hussain RZ, Ratts RB, Sikder D, Racke MK: Silencing T-bet defines a critical role in the differentiation of autoreactive T lymphocytes. Immunity. 2004, 21: 719-731. 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi T, Yoshimura A: Keeping DCs awake by putting SOCS1 to sleep. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26: 177-179. 10.1016/j.it.2005.02.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li M, Qian H, Ichim TE, Ge WW, Popov IA, Rycerz K, Neu J, White D, Zhong R, Min WP: Induction of RNA interference in dendritic cells. Immunol Res. 2004, 30: 215-230. 10.1385/IR:30:2:215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ichim TE, Li M, Qian H, Popov IA, Rycerz K, Zheng X, White D, Zhong R, Min WP: RNA interference: a potent tool for gene-specific therapeutics. Am J Transplant. 2004, 4: 1227-1236. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00530.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klein C, Bock CT, Wedemeyer H, Wustefeld T, Locarnini S, Dienes HP, Kubicka S, Manns MP, Trautwein C: Inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication in vivo by nucleoside analogues and siRNA. Gastroenterology. 2003, 125: 9-18. 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00720-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Contreras JL, Vilatoba M, Eckstein C, Bilbao G, Anthony Thompson J, Eckhoff DE: Caspase-8 and caspase-3 small interfering RNA decreases ischemia/reperfusion injury to the liver in mice. Surgery. 2004, 136: 390-400. 10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ichim TE, Zhong R, Min WP: Prevention of allograft rejection by in vitro generated tolerogenic dendritic cells. Transpl Immunol. 2003, 11: 295-306. 10.1016/S0966-3274(03)00048-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya S, Dhillon AP, Winslet MC, Davidson BR, Shukla N, Gupta SD, Al-Mufti R, Hobbs KE: Human liver cancer cells and endothelial cells incorporate iodised oil. Br J Cancer. 1996, 73: 877-881.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Romagnani S: Th1/Th2 cells. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 1999, 5: 285-294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horwitz DA, Zheng SG, Gray JD: The role of the combination of IL-2 and TGF-beta or IL-10 in the generation and function of CD4+ CD25+ and CD8+ regulatory T cell subsets. J Leukoc Biol. 2003, 74: 471-478. 10.1189/jlb.0503228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levings MK, Gregori S, Tresoldi E, Cazzaniga S, Bonini C, Roncarolo MG: Differentiation of Tr1 cells by immature dendritic cells requires IL-10 but not CD25+CD4+ Tr cells. Blood. 2005, 105: 1162-1169. 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corinti S, Albanesi C, la Sala A, Pastore S, Girolomoni G: Regulatory activity of autocrine IL-10 on dendritic cell functions. J Immunol. 2001, 166: 4312-4318.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Serra P, Amrani A, Yamanouchi J, Han B, Thiessen S, Utsugi T, Verdaguer J, Santamaria P: CD40 ligation releases immature dendritic cells from the control of regulatory CD4+CD25+ T cells. Immunity. 2003, 19: 877-889. 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00327-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohshima Y, Tanaka Y, Tozawa H, Takahashi Y, Maliszewski C, Delespesse G: Expression and function of OX40 ligand on human dendritic cells. J Immunol. 1997, 159: 3838-3848.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakahara T, Urabe K, Fukagawa S, Uchi H, Inaba K, Furue M, Moroi Y: Engagement of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells into interleukin (IL)-12 producers by IL-1beta + interferon (IFN)-gamma. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005, 139: 476-482. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02709.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walsh MC, Choi Y: Biology of the TRANCE axis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003, 14: 251-263. 10.1016/S1359-6101(03)00027-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caux C, Massacrier C, Vanbervliet B, Dubois B, Van Kooten C, Durand I, Banchereau J: Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 cross-linking. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 1263-1272. 10.1084/jem.180.4.1263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Smedt T, Van Mechelen M, De Becker G, Urbain J, Leo O, Moser M: Effect of interleukin-10 on dendritic cell maturation and function. Eur J Immunol. 1997, 27: 1229-1235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He Q, Moore TT, Eko FO, Lyn D, Ananaba GA, Martin A, Singh S, James L, Stiles J, Black CM, Igietseme JU: Molecular basis for the potency of IL-10-deficient dendritic cells as a highly efficient APC system for activating Th1 response. J Immunol. 2005, 174: 4860-4869.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vogl TJ, Wetter A, Lindemayr S, Zangos S: Treatment of unresectable lung metastases with transpulmonary chemoembolization: preliminary experience. Radiology. 2005, 234: 917-922.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Di Stefano DR, de Baere T, Denys A, Hakime A, Gorin G, Gillet M, Saric J, Trillaud H, Petit P, Bartoli JM, Elias D, Delpero JR: Preoperative percutaneous portal vein embolization: evaluation of adverse events in 188 patients. Radiology. 2005, 234: 625-630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamm B, Wolf KJ: Contrast material for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Radiol. 1991, 3: 474-482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya S, Novell JR, Winslet MC, Hobbs KE: Iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1994, 81: 1563-1571.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rowbottom AW, Lepper MA, Garland RJ, Cox CV, Corley EG: Interleukin-10-induced CD8 cell proliferation. Immunology. 1999, 98: 80-89. 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00828.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Akdis CA, Blaser K: Role of IL-10 in allergen-specific immunotherapy and normal response to allergens. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3: 891-898. 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01449-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hwang ES, Szabo SJ, Schwartzberg PL, Glimcher LH: T helper cell fate specified by kinase-mediated interaction of T-bet with GATA-3. Science. 2005, 307: 430-433. 10.1126/science.1103336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothermel AL, Wang Y, Schechner J, Mook-Kanamori B, Aird WC, Pober JS, Tellides G, Johnson DR: Endothelial cells present antigens in vivo. BMC Immunol. 2004, 5: 5-10.1186/1471-2172-5-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bourdoulous S, Beraud E, Le Page C, Zamora A, Ferry A, Bernard D, Strosberg AD, Couraud PO: Anergy induction in encephalitogenic T cells by brain microvessel endothelial cells is inhibited by interleukin-1. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 1176-1183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Modolell M, Corraliza IM, Link F, Soler G, Eichmann K: Reciprocal regulation of the nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages by TH1 and TH2 cytokines. Eur J Immunol. 1995, 25: 1101-1104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- den Brok MH, Sutmuller RP, van der Voort R, Bennink EJ, Figdor CG, Ruers TJ, Adema GJ: In situ tumor ablation creates an antigen source for the generation of antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 4024-4029. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3949.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.