Volume 13 Supplement 1

Melanoma Bridge 2014: meeting abstracts

Open Access

coBRIM: a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vemurafenib versus vemurafenib + cobimetinib in previously untreated BRAFV600 mutation–positive patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma (NCT01689519)

  • Paolo A Ascierto1,
  • Grant A. McArthur2,
  • Brigitte Dréno3,
  • James Larkin4,
  • Gabriella Liszkay5,
  • Michele Maio6,
  • Mario Mandala7,
  • Lev Demidov8,
  • Daniil Stroyakovskiy9,
  • Luc Thomas10,
  • Luis de la Cruz-Merino11,
  • Victoria Atkinson12,
  • Caroline Dutriaux13,
  • Claus Garbe14,
  • Ilsung Chang15,
  • Stephen P. Hack15 and
  • Antoni Ribas16
Journal of Translational Medicine201513(Suppl 1):O4


Published: 15 January 2015


Combined inhibition of BRAF and MEK is hypothesized to improve clinical outcomes by preventing or delaying onset of resistance observed with BRAF inhibitors alone. This randomized phase 3 study evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib.

Materials and methods

495 patients were randomly assigned to receive vemurafenib + cobimetinib (60 mg QD, 21 days on/7 days off) or vemurafenib (960 mg BID) + placebo. Eligibility included treatment-naive BRAFV600 mutation–positive patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic melanoma and adequate performance status and organ function. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Safety monitoring included serial cardiac and ophthalmic evaluation and measurement of creatine phosphokinase.


Median PFS was 9.9 months with the combination compared with 6.2 months with the control (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39-0.68; P<0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) was 68% in the combination and 45% in the control arm (P<0.0001), including complete response in 10% in the combination and 4% of patients in the control group. Subgroup analyses of PFS based on key demographic and tumor characteristics were consistent with PFS in the intent-to-treat population, including those with normal or elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). PFS assessed by independent review was comparable with investigator-assessed PFS. Interim overall survival (OS) data showed an HR of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.42-1.00) but did not cross the prespecified stopping boundary. Compared with vemurafenib alone, the combination was associated with a higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (65% vs 59%), with no difference in the rate of adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (13% vs 12%). Most grade ≥3 events occurred in the first 28 days and resolved quickly. Known MEK inhibitor–related toxicities such as diarrhea, serous retinopathy, elevated creatine phosphokinase, and increased liver transaminase levels were more commonly observed with the combination. The majority was grade 1 or 2, occurred between 1 and 4 months in the treatment course, and resolved quickly. The occurrence of secondary cutaneous neoplasms decreased with the combination (4% vs 18%). Photosensitivity was more common in patients treated with the combination (all grades 32% vs 18%).


Cobimetinib + vemurafenib significantly improved PFS and response rate among patients with BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma, with promising preliminary OS analysis. Most combination-related toxicities are mild or moderate, occur early in treatment, and are manageable by dose modification and supportive care; treatment discontinuation is uncommon.

Clinical trial registration number


Authors’ Affiliations

Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Hôtel Dieu Place Alexis Ricordeau
The Royal Marsden Hospital
National Institute of Oncology
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital
N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center
Moscow City Oncology Hospital 62
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Hopital Saint André
University of Tübingen
Genentech, Inc
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of California, Los Angeles


© Ascierto et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.