Circulating miR-378 and miR-451 in serum are potential biomarkers for renal cell carcinoma

  • Martina Redova1, 2,

    Affiliated with

    • Alexandr Poprach1,

      Affiliated with

      • Jana Nekvindova3,

        Affiliated with

        • Robert Iliev1,

          Affiliated with

          • Lenka Radova4,

            Affiliated with

            • Radek Lakomy1,

              Affiliated with

              • Marek Svoboda1, 2,

                Affiliated with

                • Rostislav Vyzula1 and

                  Affiliated with

                  • Ondrej Slaby1, 2Email author

                    Affiliated with

                    Journal of Translational Medicine201210:55

                    DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-55

                    Received: 27 December 2011

                    Accepted: 22 March 2012

                    Published: 22 March 2012

                    Abstract

                    Background

                    There is no standard serum biomarker used for diagnosis or early detection of recurrence for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are abundant and highly stable in blood serum, and have been recently described as powerful circulating biomarkers in a wide range of solid cancers. Our aim was to identify miRNA signature that can distinguish the blood serum of RCC patients and matched healthy controls and validate identified miRNAs as potential biomarkers for RCC.

                    Methods

                    In the screening phase of the study, blood serum of 15 RCC patients and 12 matched healthy controls were analyzed by use of the TaqMan Low-Density Arrays enabling parallel identification of expression levels of 667 miRNAs through qRT-PCR-based approach. In the validation phase, identified miRNAs were further evaluated on the independent group of 90 RCC patients and 35 matched healthy controls by use of individual qRT-PCR assays and statistically evaluated.

                    Results

                    We identified 30 miRNAs differentially expressed between serum of RCC patients and healthy controls: 19 miRNAs were up-regulated and 11 miRNAs were down-regulated in RCC patients. MiR-378, miR-451 and miR-150 were further evaluated in the independent group of patients, and two of them were successfully validated: levels of miR-378 were increased (p = 0.0003, AUC = 0.71), miR-451 levels were decreased (p < 0.0001, AUC = 0.77) in serum of RCC patients. Combination of miR-378 and miR-451 enable identification of RCC serum with the sensitivity of 81%, specificity 83% and AUC = 0.86.

                    Conclusions

                    Circulating miRNAs in serum are promising biomarkers in RCC.

                    Keywords

                    Renal cell carcinoma MicroRNA Serum Biomarker

                    Background

                    Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common neoplasm of adult kidney accounting for about 3% of adult malignancies and having the highest mortality rate at over 40% [1, 2]. Renal tumors are commonly asymptomatic in early stages and although surgical resection remains the best therapy for RCC, after the curative nephrectomy, 20-40% patients will develop recurrence. Unfortunately, there is no standard serum biomarker used for diagnosis or early detection of recurrence for RCC patients. Although several serum proteins that might be useful to detect the presence of advanced or recurrent RCC have been reported [3], none indicated analytical sensitivity efficient enough for translation into standard of care management for RCC patients.

                    MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a novel class of naturally occurring, short non-coding, single stranded RNAs, that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by binding to the untranslated region (3'UTR) of target mRNAs and causing translational inhibition and/or mRNA degradation [4]. Specific expression profiles of miRNAs have been shown in a variety of cancers, including RCC [46]. MiRNAs are highly stable and abundant in plasma, serum and other body fluids. Moreover, miRNA signatures in blood are similar in men and women, as well as individuals of different age [7]. These circulating miRNAs had shown great potential to serve as a novel biomarker for non-invasive diagnosis and prognosis of plenty kinds of diseases, such as cancer, and even physiological conditions such as prenatal screening. Following the release from cells, circulating miRNAs originate from (i) microvesicles (released by exocytosis), (ii) exosomes (formed via invagination of the early endosome and released upon fusion of late endosome with plasma membrane), and (iii) apoptotic vesicles and/or senescent bodies [79].

                    Expression profiles of circulating miRNAs were extensively studied in (i) colorectal cancer (CRC) where authors found miR-29a and miR-92 plasma levels to differentiate between CRC patients and controls with sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 70% and also to be associated with clinical stage [10], (ii) in ovarian cancer where levels of miR-21, miR-92 and miR-93 were higher in 3 patients with normal CA-125 levels, a clinical biomarker of ovarian cancer [11], (iii) in breast cancer where it has been described that changes in the level of total RNA, miR-10b, miR-34a, and miR-155 correlated with the presence of overt metastases [12], (iv) in prostate cancer where serum miR-141 levels were found to distinguish metastatic prostate patients from age-matched controls [13]. Such studies have clearly proved the potential of circulating miRNAs in primary diagnostics as well as in follow-up for the early detection of disease progression. In case of RCC the only study was performed and circulating miR-1233 identified, but the analytical characteristics of this biomarker in the validation study were not convincing [14]. In our study we focused on the circulating miRNAs expression profiles in the serum samples of RCC patients aiming identification of new biomarkers for RCC.

                    Materials and methods

                    Study population

                    We collected serum samples from the group of patients diagnosed for RCC and undergoing radical nephrectomy at Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (MMCI; Brno, Czech Republic) between 2003 and 2008, and matched cancer-free blood donor volunteers recruited from the same institute with no previous history of any cancer. All subjects were of the same ethnicity (Caucasian). Clinical and pathological characteristics including age, gender, stage, and grade were recorded and they are summarized in Table 1. RCC serum samples were collected after signing an informed consent prior to surgery and stored at MMCI Bank of Biological Material. The study has been approved by the local Ethical Committee at Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute (MMCI; Brno, Czech Republic).
                    Table 1

                    Patient characteristics

                     

                    Exploratory phase

                    Validation phase

                     

                    RCC

                    HC

                    RCC

                    HC

                    N

                    15

                    12

                    90

                    35

                    Sex

                        

                    male

                    10

                    10

                    56

                    26

                    female

                    5

                    2

                    34

                    9

                    Age

                        

                    median

                    62

                    61

                    66

                    63

                    range

                    53-73

                    54-69

                    36-85

                    51-70

                    Histology

                        

                    ccRCC

                    15

                    73

                    pRCC

                    0

                    8

                    chRCC

                    0

                    9

                    Pathological stage

                        

                    pT1

                    6

                    50

                    pT2

                    0

                    14

                    pT3

                    9

                    23

                    pT4

                    0

                    3

                    vascular invasion

                    5

                    16

                    lymph nodes metastatis

                    0

                    6

                    distant metastasis

                    3

                    18

                    Fuhrman grade

                        

                    G1

                    3

                    20

                    G2

                    7

                    39

                    G3

                    4

                    23

                    G4

                    1

                    8

                    Abbreviatons: RCC, renal cell carcinoma; ccRCC, clear cell RCC; pRCC, papillary RCC; chRCC, chromophobe RCC

                    RNA isolation

                    Total RNA enriched for small RNAs was isolated using Qiagen miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, GmbH, Germany) from 200 μL serum according to modified manufacturers' protocol. For each sample, to the 800 μl of QIAzol solution was added 1.25 μl 0.8 μg/μl MS2 RNA carrier (Roche, cat. No. 10165948001). The extracted RNA was eluted in 50 μL of preheated Elution Solution, and concentration and purity of RNA were determined spectrofotometrically by measuring its optical density (A260/280 > 2.0; A260/230 > 1.8) using NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). The samples were either stored at -80°C or further processed.

                    TaqMan low density arrays - screening phase

                    In the screening phase, we performed TaqMan Low Density Arrays (TLDA) analysis to identify differentially expressed miRNAs from the two pooled serum samples (15 ccRCC patients vs. 12 healthy controls). In brief, 35 ng of total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA by the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit and Megaplex RT set pool A and B version 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). To obtain sufficient amount of cDNA for TLDA analysis, pre-amplification step using TaqMan PreAmp MasterMix was added. The pre-amplified product was loaded into TaqMan Array Human MicroRNA A + B Cards Set v2.0 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) enabling simultaneous quantitation of 667 human miRNAs. TaqMan MicroRNA Assays and analysis were performed on the ABI 7900HT Instrument (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). All reactions were performed according to the standard manufacturers' protocols. Quantitative miRNAs expression data were acquired and normalized by use of ABI 7900HT SDS software (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA).

                    qRT-PCR - Validation phase

                    In validation phase of the study, candidate miRNAs identified by TLDA technology were further characterized. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthetised from total RNA using miRNA-specific primers according to the TaqMan MicroRNA Assay protocol (Applied Biosystems). For RT reactions 10 ng of RNA sample, 50 nM of stem-loop RT primer, 1 × RT buffer, 0.25 mM each of dNTPs, 3.33 U μl-1 MultiScribe reverse transcriptase and 0.25 U μl-1 RNase inhibitor (all from TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit, Applied Biosystems) was used. Reaction mixtures (15 μl) were incubated for 30 min at 16°C, 30 min at 42°C, 5 min at 85°C and then held at 4°C. qRT-PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 instrument. The 20-μl PCR reaction mixture included 1.33 μl of RT product, 1 × TaqMan (AmpErase UNG) Universal PCR Master Mix and 1 μl of primer and probe mix of the TaqMan MicroRNA Assay kit (Applied Biosystems). Reactions were incubated in a 96-well optical plate at 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 10 min. All reactions were run in duplicate and average threshold cycle and SD values were calculated.

                    Statistical methods

                    In both phases, analysis of the qRT-PCR data was performed using the SDS 2.0.1 software (Applied Biosystems) (settings: automatic baseline, threshold 0.2). According to manufacturer's recommendations, miR-16 has been chosen as reference for normalization of miRNAs expression levels. The relative expression levels of target miRNAs were determined by the equation 2-ΔCT, in which ΔCT were calculated as follows: ΔCT = CT miR-of-interest - CT miR-16. Relative miRNA levels were then calculated with the RQ Manager 1.2. Normalized expression data from screening phase of the study were statistically evaluated in environment of statistical language R by use of Bioconductor package and LIMMA approach combined with hierarchical clustering (HCL) [15]. Normalized expression data in validation phase were statistically analyzed with MedCalc software version 11.2.1. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical differences between expression levels in RCC patients' and healthy controls' samples were evaluated by non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Sensitivity, specificity and area under curve (AUC) for serum microRNA levels were determined using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis.

                    Results

                    Screening phase

                    In this biomarker discovery phase, a strategy for effective identification of RCC-associated miRNAs in serum was performed using qRT-PCR-based miRNAs expression profiling arrays. We determined the miRNA expression profile of 667 miRNAs in serum from ccRCC patients (n = 15) using TaqMan Low Density Arrays technology, and compared to the expression profile of healthy individuals (n = 12); the miRNA expression levels were normalized to miR-16, the mean expression levels were calculated and data analyzed by use of the microarray biostatistical approaches. We observed 30 miRNAs differentially expressed between serum of ccRCC patients and healthy controls: 19 miRNAs were up-regulated in ccRCC patients and 11 miRNAs were down-regulated (Figure 1, Table 2). Among them, up-regulated miR-378 (FC = 37.6, p < 0.000001), and down-regulated miR-150 (FC = 0.02, p < 0.000001) and miR-451 (FC = 0.2, p < 0.000001) were proposed as putative biomarkers to the validation phase of the study, as significance of the difference (fold change, p-value), previous observations and biological plausibility (based on the PubMed hits when particular miRNA is combined with keyword "cancer"), and miRNAs with favorable expression levels (Ct > 30) were taken into account.
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-10-55/MediaObjects/12967_2011_1029_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 1

                    Hierarchical clustergram iscriminating blood serum of RCC patients and healthy controls according to diferentially expressed miRNAs (yellow color indicate serum samples of RCC patients, blue healthy controls, p < 0.0001).

                    Table 2

                    MiRNAs diferentially expressed between serum of ccRCC patients and healthy controls

                    miRNA

                    Fold change

                    P-value

                    Probability, that gene is differentially expressed

                    hsa-miR-760

                    169.628

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-381

                    0.002

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-378

                    37.596

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-151-3p

                    35.734

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-629

                    45.790

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-150

                    0.020

                    < 0.000001

                    100.000%

                    hsa-miR-219-5p

                    0.032

                    < 0.000001

                    99.999%

                    hsa-miR-26b*

                    41.191

                    < 0.000001

                    99.999%

                    hsa-miR-302b

                    0.057

                    < 0.000001

                    99.997%

                    hsa-miR-19b-1*

                    36.432

                    < 0.000001

                    99.994%

                    hsa-miR-126*

                    9.317

                    < 0.000001

                    99.972%

                    hsa-let-7f

                    0.011

                    < 0.000001

                    99.968%

                    hsa-miR-571

                    30.947

                    < 0.000001

                    99.978%

                    hsa-miR-29c*

                    23.842

                    < 0.000001

                    99.976%

                    hsa-miR-625*

                    13.286

                    < 0.000001

                    99.938%

                    hsa-let-7a

                    0.014

                    < 0.000001

                    99.922%

                    hsa-miR-134

                    40.828

                    < 0.000001

                    99.846%

                    hsa-miR-320

                    4.533

                    < 0.000001

                    99.811%

                    hsa-miR-451

                    0.225

                    < 0.000001

                    99.723%

                    hsa-miR-19a

                    0.261

                    < 0.000001

                    99.651%

                    hsa-miR-365

                    16.768

                    < 0.000001

                    99.642%

                    hsa-miR-339-3p

                    10.606

                    < 0.000001

                    99.524%

                    hsa-miR-203

                    79.565

                    < 0.000001

                    98.908%

                    hsa-miR-302c

                    0.044

                    < 0.000001

                    98.729%

                    hsa-miR-454*

                    11.965

                    < 0.000001

                    97.193%

                    hsa-miR-144*

                    6.425

                    < 0.00001

                    92.206%

                    hsa-miR-655

                    10.716

                    < 0.00001

                    84.080%

                    hsa-miR-367

                    0.133

                    < 0.00001

                    81.739%

                    hsa-miR-425*

                    6.666

                    < 0.0001

                    79.234%

                    hsa-miR-142-5p

                    0.136

                    < 0.0001

                    74.933%

                    Abbreviations: miR, microRNA/miRNA; ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma

                    Validation phase

                    To validate the 3 promising biomarkers identified in the screening phase, miR-378, miR-451 and miR-150, qRT-PCR assays were developed to quantify miRNAs in serum of RCC patients and healthy controls. The qRT-PCR was performed in the independent cohort of 90 RCC patients' and 35 healthy controls' serum samples. As the difference in miR-150 expression level between RCC and healthy controls serum did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.222), miR-150 was excluded from further analysis. The expression of miR-378 serum level was significantly increased in patients with RCC compared to healthy controls (p = 0.0003), and the expression level of miR-451 was significantly decreased in patients with RCC compared to healthy controls (p < 0.0001), confirming the results of screening phase (Figure 2A-B, Table 3). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis revealed that the serum levels of both miR-378 and miR-451 might serve as useful biomarkers for differentiating serum of patients with RCC from controls with AUC of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.79), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.84), respectively (Figure 2C-D). At the cut-off value of 0.02 for relative expression of miR-378 normalized to miR-16 levels, the sensitivity was 70% and the specificity was 60%. At the cut-off value of 2.0 for relative expression of miR-451 normalized to miR-16 levels, the sensitivity was 81% and the specificity was 77%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both miR-378 and miR-451 could serve as potential biomarkers for distinguishing between RCC and healthy controls, and even that their combination could improve the stratification power characterized with AUC of 0.86 and the sensitivity of 81% and specificity 83% (Figure 3).
                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-10-55/MediaObjects/12967_2011_1029_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 2

                    Validation phase of miR-378, miR-451 and miR-150 in an independent group of serum samples (n = 125). Scatter plots of serum levels of (A) miR-378 and (B) miR-451 in healthy control (HC) samples (n = 35) and patients with RCC (n = 90). Expression levels of the miRNAs (log10 scale on the y-axis) are normalized to miR-16. The line represents the mean value. Statistically significant differences were determined using Mann-Whitney tests.

                    Table 3

                    MiRNAs evaluated in the validation phase of study

                    miRNA

                    HC*

                    RCC*

                    p-value

                    Cancer association

                    Experimentaly validated target

                    miR-378

                    0.004

                    0.002-0.006

                    0.008

                    0.004-0.037

                    0.0003

                    colorectal

                    carcinoma [16, 17], oral

                    squamous cell

                    carcinoma [18],

                    laryngeal

                    carcinoma [19]

                    SUFU, TUSC2,

                    TOB2, CYP2E1

                    miR-451

                    2.067

                    1.250-3.480

                    0.802

                    0.055-1.091

                    0.0001

                    renal cell carcinoma [1],

                    colorectal

                    carcinoma [20],

                    gastric cancer [20]

                    MMP2, MMP9,

                    BCL2

                    miR-150

                    0.011

                    0.009-0.016

                    0.008

                    0.005-0.020

                    0.2222

                    gastric cancer [21],

                    chronic myeloid

                    leukemia [22],

                    colorectal

                    carcinoma [23]

                    HTT, MYB,

                    EGFR2

                    Abbreviations: HC, healthy controls; RCC, renal cell carcinoma

                    *expression levels are presented as medians and interquartile range

                    http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-10-55/MediaObjects/12967_2011_1029_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                    Figure 3

                    ROC curve for combination of serum miR-378 and miR-451 yielded AUC of 0.86, the sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 83% in discriminating RCC.

                    Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis using (C) serum miR-451 yielded an AUC of 0.77, sensitivity of 81%, and specificity of 77% in discriminating RCC and (D) serum miR-378 yielded AUC of 0.71, sensitivity of 70%, and specificity of 60% in discriminating RCC

                    Discussion

                    Many recent studies have described miRNAs expression profile in RCC and adjacent non-tumoral tissue confirming the different pattern. Although significant overlap between miRNAs identified by independent studies exist, regarding the number and type of up-/down-regulated miRNAs, data are in part conflicting [1, 2, 24, 25]. Circulating miRNAs may possibly serve as a new class of powerful and non-invasive biomarkers for RCC patients. Regarding this hypothesis, we compared the miRNAs expression profiles of RCC patients' and healthy controls' serum samples. Based on the qRT-PCR arrays approach we were able to describe 30 differentially expressed miRNAs, 19 of these miRNAs were up-regulated and 11 were down-regulated. Such expression profile is a bit controversial, as the global miRNA down-regulation in RCC tissue samples has been repeatedly described [14]. The possible relation of miRNA levels between tissue and corresponding serum is still not clearly understood - some researchers postulate that circulating miRNAs may not always be directly associated with the changes occuring in tumor tissues but may also reflect indirect effects and could be secreted by non-tumoral cells. Also mechanisms were described how extracellular miRNAs can potentially interact with recipient cells via a number of different processes, including: direct fusion, internalization or receptor-mediated interactions. There are likely to be other mechanisms, especially for vesicle-free miRNAs, but all await further investigation to provide convincing evidence of their involvement in inter-cellular miRNA exchange [26, 27]. However, this proposed potential of tumor cells to actively uptake miRNAs from circulation can partly explain the opposite trends of miRNA expression levels in tissue compared to blood serum. Several dysregulated miRNAs identified in our study have been described to have altered expression levels in plasma or serum of various cancers recently: up-regulated mir-425* [28, 29], let-7a [30] or let-7f [31].

                    In the validation phase of this study, we tested 3 candidate miRNAs (miR-378, miR-451, miR-150) in the independent cohort of RCC patients. The up-regulation of miR-378 and down-regulation of miR-451 expression levels between serum of RCC patients and healthy controls reached statistical significance in validation study. Analytical characteristics of miR-378 (sensitivity of 70%, specificity of 60%) and miR-451 (sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 77%) proved that both miR-378 and miR-451 are potent in discriminating RCC from healthy control serum. Furthermore, combination of serum miR-378 and miR-451 levels, yielded sensitivity of 81% and specificity 83%, proved to be even more powerful discrimination tool. To our knowledge, the only study concerning circulating miRNAs in renal cell carcinoma identified circulating miR-1233 as a potential biomarker for RCC patients, but although they performed the validation phase on a large cohort of RCC patients from three different study centers, the diagnostic information was below their expectations (AUC of 0.588, sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 37.6%) [14].

                    Although our observations are promising, and miR-378/miR-451 analytical characteristics reached values for clinical utility, large-scale prospective studies aiming their evaluation in the renal benign neoplasms and early stages of the RCC are necessary to validate them as biomarkers for early diagnosis, and the analysis of blood serum collections from each patient to evaluate miRNA biomarker dynamics are needed to prove their potential for early detection of relapse in RCC patients.

                    Conclusions

                    There is no standard serum biomarker used for diagnosis or early detection of recurrence for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. In our study, we identified 30 miRNAs differentially expressed between serum of RCC patients and healthy controls. MiR-378, miR-451 and miR-150 were further evaluated in the independent group of patients, and two of them were successfully validated: levels of miR-378 were increased, miR-451 levels were decreased in serum of RCC patients. Combination of miR-378 and miR-451 enable identification of RCC serum with the sensitivity of 81%, specificity 83% and AUC = 0.86. We believe, that circulating miRNAs in serum are promising biomarkers in RCC.

                    Declarations

                    Acknowledgements

                    This work was supported by grant IGA 10361-3/2009 of the Czech Ministry of Health, Project No. MZ0MOU2005 of the Czech Ministry of Health, by The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports for the project BBMRI CZ (LM2010004), and by the project "CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology" (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068).

                    Authors’ Affiliations

                    (1)
                    Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute
                    (2)
                    Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University
                    (3)
                    Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Institute of Clinical Biochemistry and Diagnostics, Charles University
                    (4)
                    Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and Palacky University affiliated Hospital Olomouc

                    References

                    1. Yi Z, Fu Y, Zhao S, Zhang X, Ma C: Differential expression of miRNA patterns in renal cell carcinoma and nontumorous tissues. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010, 136:855–862.PubMedView Article
                    2. Chow TF, Youssef YM, Lianidou E, Romaschin AD, Honey RJ, Stewart R, Pace KT, Yousef GM: Differential expression profiling of microRNAs and their potential involvement in renal cell carcinoma pathogenesis. Clin Biochem 2010, 43:150–158.PubMedView Article
                    3. Ljungberg B: Prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Curr Opin Urol 2007, 17:303–308.PubMedView Article
                    4. Slaby O, Jancovicova J, Lakomy R, Svoboda M, Poprach A, Fabian P, Kren L, Michalek J, Vyzula R: Expression of miRNA-106b in conventional renal cell carcinoma is a potential marker for prediction of early metastasis after nephrectomy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010, 29:90.PubMedView Article
                    5. Slaby O, Svoboda M, Michalek J, Vyzula R: MicroRNAs in colorectal cancer: translation of molecular biology into clinical application. Mol Cancer 2009, 8:102.PubMedView Article
                    6. Redova M, Svoboda M, Slaby O: MicroRNAs and their target gene networks in renal cell carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 405:153–156.View Article
                    7. Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C: MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2008, 110:13–21.PubMedView Article
                    8. Esquela-Kerscher A, Slack FJ: Oncomirs - microRNAs with a role in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2006, 6:259–269.PubMedView Article
                    9. Lawrie CH, Gal S, Dunlop HM, Pushkaran B, Liggins AP, Pulford K, Banham AH, Pezzella F, Boultwood J, Wainscoat JS, Hatton CS, Harris AL: Detection of elevated levels of tumour-associated microRNAs in serum of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2008, 141:672–675.PubMedView Article
                    10. Huang Z, Huang D, Ni S, Peng Z, Sheng W, Du X: Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2010, 127:118–126.PubMedView Article
                    11. Resnick KE, Alder H, Hagan JP, Richardson DL, Croce CM, Cohn DE: The detection of differentially expressed microRNAs from the serum of ovarian cancer patients using a novel real-time PCR platform. Gynecol Oncol 2009, 112:55–59.PubMedView Article
                    12. Roth C, Rack B, Muller V, Janni W, Pantel K, Schwarzenbach H: Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010, 12:R90.PubMedView Article
                    13. Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, Lin DW, Urban N, Drescher CW, Knudsen BS, Stirewalt DL, Gentleman R, Vessella RL, Nelson PS, Martin DB, Tewari M: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:10513–10518.PubMedView Article
                    14. Wulfken LM, Moritz R, Ohlmann C, Holdenrieder S, Jung V, Becker F, Herrmann E, Walgenbach-Brunagel G, von Ruecker A, Muller SC, Ellinger J: MicroRNAs in renal cell carcinoma: diagnostic implications of serum miR-1233 levels. PLoS One 2011, 6:e25787.PubMedView Article
                    15. Reimers M, Carey VJ: Bioconductor: an open source framework for bioinformatics and computational biology. Methods Enzymol 2006, 411:119–134.PubMedView Article
                    16. Ng EK, Chong WW, Jin H, Lam EK, Shin VY, Yu J, Poon TC, Ng SS, Sung JJ: Differential expression of microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening. Gut 2009, 58:1375–1381.PubMedView Article
                    17. Mosakhani N, Sarhadi VK, Borze I, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Sundstrom J, Ristamaki R, Osterlund P, Knuutila S: MicroRNA profiling differentiates colorectal cancer according to KRAS status. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2012, 51:1–9.PubMedView Article
                    18. Scapoli L, Palmieri A, Lo Muzio L, Pezzetti F, Rubini C, Girardi A, Farinella F, Mazzotta M, Carinci F: MicroRNA expression profiling of oral carcinoma identifies new markers of tumor progression. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2010, 23:1229–1234.PubMed
                    19. Wang P, Fu T, Wang X, Zhu W: Primary, study of miRNA expression patterns in laryngeal carcinoma by microarray. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2010, 24:535–538.PubMed
                    20. Bandres E, Bitarte N, Arias F, Agorreta J, Fortes P, Agirre X, Zarate R, Diaz-Gonzalez JA, Ramirez N, Sola JJ, Jimenez P, Rodriguez J, Garcia-Foncillas J: microRNA-451 regulates macrophage migration inhibitory factor production and proliferation of gastrointestinal cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:2281–2290.PubMedView Article
                    21. Wu Q, Jin H, Yang Z, Luo G, Lu Y, Li K, Ren G, Su T, Pan Y, Feng B, Xue Z, Wang X, Fan D: MiR-150 promotes gastric cancer proliferation by negatively regulating the pro-apoptotic gene EGR2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010, 392:340–345.PubMedView Article
                    22. Flamant S, Ritchie W, Guilhot J, Holst J, Bonnet ML, Chomel JC, Guilhot F, Turhan AG, Rasko JE: Micro-RNA response to imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2010, 95:1325–1333.PubMedView Article
                    23. Ma Y, Zhang P, Wang F, Zhang H, Yang J, Peng J, Liu W, Qin H: miR-150 as a potential biomarker associated with prognosis and therapeutic outcome in colorectal cancer. Gut 2011, in press. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2011–301122
                    24. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, Ambs S, Cimmino A, Petrocca F, Visone R, Iorio M, Roldo C, Ferracin M, Prueitt RL, Yanaihara N, Lanza G, Scarpa A, Vecchione A, Negrini M, Harris CC, Croce CM: A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:2257–2261.PubMedView Article
                    25. Youssef YM, White NM, Grigull J, Krizova A, Samy C, Mejia-Guerrero S, Evans A, Yousef GM: Accurate molecular classification of kidney cancer subtypes using microRNA signature. Eur Urol 2011, 59:721–730.PubMedView Article
                    26. Hu Z, Chen X, Zhao Y, Tian T, Jin G, Shu Y, Chen Y, Xu L, Zen K, Zhang C, Shen H: Serum microRNA signatures identified in a genome-wide serum microRNA expression profiling predict survival of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:1721–1726.PubMedView Article
                    27. Reid G, Kirschner MB, van Zandwijk N: Circulating microRNAs: Association with disease and potential use as biomarkers. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011, 80:193–208.PubMedView Article
                    28. Grinchuk OV, Jenjaroenpun P, Orlov YL, Zhou J, Kuznetsov VA: Integrative analysis of the human cis-antisense gene pairs, miRNAs and their transcription regulation patterns. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:534–547.PubMedView Article
                    29. Zhao H, Shen J, Medico L, Wang D, Ambrosone CB, Liu S: A pilot study of circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers of early stage breast cancer. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13735.PubMedView Article
                    30. Tsujiura M, Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Takeshita H, Kosuga T, Konishi H, Morimura R, Deguchi K, Fujiwara H, Okamoto K, Otsuji E: Circulating microRNAs in plasma of patients with gastric cancers. Br J Cancer 2010, 102:1174–1179.PubMedView Article
                    31. Silva J, Garcia V, Zaballos A, Provencio M, Lombardia L, Almonacid L, Garcia JM, Dominguez G, Pena C, Diaz R, Herrera M, Varela A, Bonilla F: Vesicle-related microRNAs in plasma of nonsmall cell lung cancer patients and correlation with survival. Eur Respir J 2011, 37:617–623.PubMedView Article

                    Copyright

                    © Redova et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

                    Advertisement