Open Access

Identification of novel mutations by targeted exome sequencing and the genotype-phenotype assessment of patients with achromatopsia

Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine201513:334

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0694-7

Received: 13 July 2015

Accepted: 10 October 2015

Published: 22 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a severe congenital autosomal recessive retinal disorder caused by loss of cone photoreceptors. Here, we aimed to determine the underlying genetic lesions and phenotypic correlations in two Chinese families with ACHM.

Methods

Medical history and clinical evaluation were obtained from both families. Targeted exome sequencing (TES) was performed on 201 disease-causing genes of inherited retinal dystrophies to screen for ACHM causative mutations in the two probands.

Results

The compound heterozygous mutations in CNGA3 (c.1074G > A, p.W358X; c.1706G > A, p.R569H) were identified in the first proband, and a novel homozygous mutation (c.968C > A, p.A323D) was detected in the other pedigree. The proposed topological model of the CNGA3 polypeptide suggested that the missense mutations primarily affected the transmembrane helix 5 and the cGMP-binding domain, respectively. Crystal structure modeling of the cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channel α-3 (CNGA3) protein encoded by the CNGA3 gene revealed an abnormal combined structure generated by R569H.

Conclusions

We firstly used the TES approach to identify genetic alterations in patients with ACHM. We uncovered three mutations in CNGA3, including one novel mutation. Our results not only expand the genotypic spectrum for CNGA3 mutations, but also demonstrate that the TES approach is a valuable tool for molecular diagnosis.

Keywords

Targeted exome sequencing Genotype-phenotype Novel mutations Achromatopsia Genetic diagnosis

Background

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is an early-onset and mostly stationary retinal dystrophy characterized by amblyopia (severely reduced visual acuity), pendular nystagmus, photophobia, and reduced or complete loss of color discrimination [1]. Currently, the diagnosis of ACHM is based on medical history, typical clinical manifestations, color discrimination problems in color vision testing, absent or reduced photopic (cone) responses and normal scotopic (rod) responses in electroretinograms (ERGs), and the presence of a normal fundus or only minor changes upon fundus photography [2].

To date, five causative genes (CNGA3, CNGB3, GNAT2, PDE6C and PDE6H) have been identified in ACHM patients [1, 36]. These genes encode crucial components of the cone phototransduction cascade. Mutations in CNGA3 and CNGB3, which encode the α-subunit and β-subunit of the CNG, account for 25 % and 40–50 % of affected individuals in multiple ethnic groups, respectively [3, 7]. Mutations in CNGA3 are considered the most common cause of ACHM and cone-rod dystrophies (CORDs) in Chinese, in which only cone photoreceptors are usually affected, although CNGA3 mutations have been reported in a patient with CORDs and Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) [8, 9]. However, approximately 20–30 % of ACHM cases appear to lack pathogenic mutations, which is likely due to the limitations in the number of screened regions [1, 35, 10].

Traditional techniques using Sanger sequencing for molecular diagnosis have several limitations, including being time-intensive and inconvenient for large scale analysis. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been shown to identify variants rapidly and systematically on an extremely large scale, which has greatly accelerated the development of gene discovery and molecular diagnosis [11]. NGS is increasingly being used for discovery of causative genes of Mendelian diseases and for genetic diagnosis [12, 13]. Targeted exome sequencing (TES) is an efficient method of NGS based on custom designed capture panels. TES can be used to identify disease-causing genes and to screen for mutations in hundreds of loci in genetically heterogeneous diseases. TES is less costly than whole genome sequencing (WGS) for mapped chromosomal regions, as well as for whole exome sequencing (WES). Thus, TES has several advantages compared to other approaches for reducing costs while enriching for discovery of highly penetrant variants [14], and for identifying pathogenic mutations with respect to both efficiency and accuracy. To date, some studies performed WES and detected causative mutations of ACHM [15, 16], but these lacked the TES approach to aid in molecular diagnosis of ACHM. Considering the enormous genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity of inherited retinal dystrophies, there remains great potential to discover novel mutations or genes. In our study, we performed TES to screen 201 disease-causing genes of inherited retinal dystrophies in two families with ACHM, and discovered novel disease causative mutations, which broaden the spectrum of ACHM in Chinese.

Methods

Participants and clinical evaluations

The study protocol was designed in adherence to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Nine participants from two unrelated families, including two patients and seven unaffected family members (Fig. 1a) were recruited to this study. Informed consent was obtained from all participants or their statutory guardian prior to the study. Patients’ initial symptoms and complaints included poor visual acuity and pendular nystagmus at an early age. Patients received a clinical diagnosis based on medical history, routine ophthalmological examination, and specialized visual function testing, including color vision testing, fundus photography and ERGs. A detailed family history was obtained from the patients and/or their relatives, and peripheral blood samples were collected.
Fig. 1

Pedigrees and identified mutations. a Pedigrees of two families were demonstrated with CNGA3 genotypes was annotated to included family members. Probands are indicated by arrows. Circles females; squares males; filled symbols affected patients; empty symbols unaffected controls. b DNA sequencing profiles of the identified mutations (upper) and their wild-type form (under)

Targeted exome sequencing

We extracted a minimum of 3 μg of genomic DNA from each blood sample and fragmented it in order to construct the DNA library. One patient from each family was selected for TES. Biotinylated single-strand DNA capture probes were hybridized in solution with the target library. Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads were used to wash, elute, and amplify the DNA, which was then subjected to NGS using an Illumina Solexa HiSeq 2000 sequencer. A previously described targeted capture panel including 201 disease-causing genes (Additional file 1: Table S1) of inherited retinal dystrophies was applied for mutation screening in both pairs of patients [17].

In-depth bioinformatics analyses and Sanger sequencing

The following databases were used for annotation of all identified variants: HapMap Project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), dbSNP137 (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/hg19/database), 1000 Genome Project (ftp://1000genomes.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ftp), Exome Variant Server (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/) and ExAC (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/). For variants that passed the initial filtration, we performed Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1b) and segregation analysis of the candidate mutant alleles in each patient’s family. To evaluate the different identified sequence variations, we analyzed 200 healthy control DNA samples.

In silico analyses

The pathogenicity of the variant was assessed using in silico predicting online available programs, including PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/), SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/www/SIFT_enst_submit.html), and MutationTaster (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) for missense variants. Together, these assessments provided information on the pathogenicity of the variant. The topological model of the CNGA3 polypeptide was predicted using SMART (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). The crystal structures of the wild-type and mutant proteins were predicted using Phyre2 (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index) [18] and visualized with PyMol software (Version 1.5). The model structure of the human cone CNG comprised of two CNGA3 and two CNGB3 subunits was previously described [19].

Results

Clinical findings

One patient from each family was clinically diagnosed with ACHM, and their detailed clinical features and mutations were summarized in Table 1. F1-II:2 reported to have evident nystagmus within the first few months after birth. Coincidentally, F2-IV:1 is a 29 year-old man with evident poor vision accompanied by nystagmus. The fundus presented with temporal disc pallor in F2-IV:1, and F1-II:2 only showed poor foveal reflex. There was no family history of ophthalmic disease, but the patient F2-IV:1 was from a consanguineous family. Both patients had normal anterior segments, ocular media, severe photophobia, and were unable to perform color-discrimination tasks. ERGs revealed severely reduced cone responses and normal rod response. Since ERGs were incomplete in young children, we only obtained results from F2-IV:1. All clinical manifestations were typical of complete ACHM.
Table 1

Clinical features of the ACHM patients in this study

Patient ID

Gene

Mutation

Gender

Age

Clinical manifestation

BCVA

Fundus appearance

ERGs

Exam

Onset

NYS

PP

PV

OD

OS

OD

OS

Rods

Cones

Family1-II:2

CNGA3

c.1074G > A; c.1706G > A

M

6 years

2 months

+

+

+

0.05

0.05

PFR

PFR

NA

NA

Family2-IV:1

CNGA3

c.968C > A; c.968C > A

M

29 years

<7 years

+

+

+

0.12

0.12

TDP

TDP

Normal

Severely reduced

M male, NYS nystagmus, PP photophobia, BCVA best corrected visual acuity, OD right eye, OS left eye, PV poor vision, PFR poor foveal reflex, TDP temporal disc pallor, ERGs electroretinograms, NA not available

Mutations identified by TES

We used a panel covering 201 disease-causing genes of inherited retinal dystrophies to screen for ACHM mutations. Our TES reached an average mean depth of 168X with greater than 97.8 % coverage of the targeted regions. After alignment and bioinformatics analyses, single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertions/deletions (Indels) were annotated to the exome databases, of which those with MAF >0.005 or found homozygous >1 subject were filtered. The missense variants were discarded with tolerant prediction using in silico tools. Candidate variants were then confirmed in the family members. In total, compound heterozygous mutations and one homozygous mutation in the CNGA3 gene were identified in the two families (Fig. 1a, b). In family 1, the proband F1-II:2 harbored two different heterozygous mutations in CNGA3 (c.1074G > A, p.W358X; c.1706G > A, p.R569H), which were demonstrated to originate from the paternal and maternal allele, respectively. His healthy sister carried a heterozygous mutation (c.1074G > A, p.W358X). Both of these mutations were identified in previous studies [7, 8, 20]. In family 2, the proband F2-IV:1 harbored one homozygous mutation in CNGA3 (c.968C > A, p.A323D), as a result of being consanguineous to the F2 family. His healthy sister (IV:3) carried a heterozygous mutation and brother (IV:4) has normal genotype. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the A323D mutation. These two missense mutations were predicted to be deleterious based on three types of online predictive software (Table 2). We aimed to detect whether any of the three potential mutations existed in normal populations, so direct Sanger sequencing of the three points were applied in 200 healthy controls. Finally, all the three potential mutations were absent in the 200 controls.
Table 2

CNGA3 mutations identified in the study

Family ID

Exon

Variation

PolyPhen2

SIFT

Mutation taster

DbSNP

References

Nucleotide

Protein

Status

Type

Family1

7

c.1074G > A

p.W358X

Het

Nonsense

Novel

[8]

Family1

7

c.1706G > A

p.R569H

Het

Missense

PD (0.991)

D (0.00)

DC (0.999)

Novel

[7, 20]

Family2

7

c.968C > A

p.A323D

Hom

Missense

PD (0.960)

D (0.02)

DC (0.999)

Novel

This study

Het heterozygous, Hom homozygous, D deleterious, PD probably damaging, DC disease-causing

Structural modeling

The first G-A substitution (W358X) in exon 7 of the CNGA3 gene is predicted to generate a premature termination codon (PTC) at residue 358 of the CNGA3 protein (Fig. 2a). The second mutation (R569H) is a missense mutation that changes Arginine to Histidine at residue 569. The A323D mutation was a novel missense substitution from Alanine to the Aspartic acid at residue 323. The proposed topological model of the CNGA3 polypeptide included the six transmembrane helices (S1–S6), the ion pore, and the cGMP-binding domain [7, 21]. Both the R569H and A323D missense mutations affected evolutionarily highly conserved amino acid residues in CNGA3; R569H is located in the cGMP-binding domain while A323D mostly affects transmembrane helix S5 (Fig. 2a, b). Structural modeling revealed the generation of a novel bond between the mutated Histidine at residue 569 and Tyrosine at residue 508 (Fig. 3a, b). The other homozygous mutation (A323D) changes Alanine to Aspartic acid (Fig. 3c, d). The model structure of the human cone CNG, which is comprised of two CNGA3 (α) and two CNGB3 (β) subunits (Fig. 3e, f), revealed that both mutations affect highly conserved residues. Although there was no apparent change in the œ-subunits. These mutations significantly affect the combination between α-subunit and ß-subunit. Structural modeling was constructed on the basis of the crystal structure of template c4chwB [18], which demonstrated sequence coverage of 49 % with the protein cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channel α-subunit.
Fig. 2

Mutations identified in two families. a Multiple sequence alignment of CNGA3 polypeptides of different species showing the conserved amino acid residues (Arginine 569 and Alanine 323). b Exons of the CNGA3 gene (upper) and location of the mutations with respect to the topological model of the CNGA3 polypeptide

Fig. 3

Predicted crystal structures of CNGA3 protein. Predicted crystal structures of wild-type (a, c) and mutant (b, d) CNGA3 protein. Side view (e) and extracellular view (f) of the transmembrane domain of the cone CNG model structure. The proposed locations of the two CNGA3 and two CNGB3 subunits are marked. Magenta coloring indicates residue 569, while pink represents residue 323

Discussion

Achromatopsia (ACHM) is a severe congenital autosomal recessive retinal disorder caused by loss of cone photoreceptors. Mutations in the CNGA3 gene are recognized as the most common causes of ACHM and cone-rod dystrophies in the Chinese population [8]. In our study, we report three distinct disease-causative CNGA3 mutations, including one novel variant and two known mutations, in two Chinese families with ACHM. Two heterozygous mutations in F1 have been previously reported, however this type of compound CNGA3 mutation has not been described to date. Furthermore, we reveal for the first time a novel homozygous missense (A323D) in CNGA3 that leads to ACHM.

The CNGA3 gene, located on chromosome 2q11, contains 7 exons. CNGA3 and CNGB3 encode the α- and β-subunits that composed to the cone CNG. Heterologous expression studies have shown that the α-subunits are responsible for the ion-conducting activity of the channel, whereas the β-subunits function as modulators [21]. A study using a homologous Cnga3 knockout-mouse model demonstrated complete absence of physiologically measurable cone function, a decrease in the number of cones in the retina, and morphological abnormalities of the remaining cones [22]. The compound heterozygous mutations, W358X and R569H, are unable to retain crucial functional activity. The R569H heterozygous and A323D homozygous mutations are mainly confined to the functionally and structurally important central parts of the CNGA3 polypeptide, affecting the S5 and the cGMP-binding domains, respectively. Crystal structure modeling suggests that R569H impacts on the generation of bonds, while A323D is not predicted to significantly influence the spatial conformation of the protein. However, the addition of hydrogen could potentially affect the association with the β-subunit, as both mutants localize to highly conversed residues.

Patients in both families showed typical clinical manifestations of ACHM. The importance of CNGA3 mutations is underscored by the finding that these mutations not only cause complete ACHM, but also incomplete ACHM [7]. With respect to incomplete ACHM, combined clinical diagnosis with diagnostic panels used for genetic testing can improve the sensitivity of diagnosis. Ophthalmological evaluation, including color vision testing, fundus photography and ERGs. Color vision testing was unable to be performed in cases of severe photophobia and poor visual acuity. Fundus photography and ERGs are time-consuming, and can be stressful for the patient. Moreover, clinical investigations are sometimes incomplete in children or might require general anaesthesia. Moreover, genetic testing in the patients allowed a focused analysis opportunity for genetic risk assessment and genetic counselling [2].

To date, a small number of studies have focused on gene therapy in patients carrying mutations in the CNGA3 gene [23, 24]. Using the novel TES approach described in our study, one can confirm the clinical diagnosis and rapidly identify the mutations, which greatly enables therapeutic intervention and personalized medicine.

Conclusions

In summary, we used the paneled exome sequencing methodology for molecular diagnosis of inherited ACHM, and identified three mutations in two patients, including two compound mutations and one novel homozygous mutation. TES can be used for both investigative and diagnostic purposes as this technique can identify the disease causing mutations. Genetic testing is a useful tool to complement diagnostic procedures, and TES can be of particular benefit to children with early-onset ACHM.

Notes

Abbreviations

ACHM: 

achromatopsia

ERGs: 

electroretinograms

CORDs: 

cone-rod dystrophies

LCA: 

leber congenital amaurosis

NGS: 

next-generation sequencing

TES: 

targeted exome sequencing

WGS: 

whole genome sequencing

WES: 

whole exome sequencing

SNVs: 

single nucleotide variants

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ZJ and FL designed the study; ZJ, JC and XY recruited patients and recorded clinical data; FL, XH and MZ performed the experiments; ZJ, FL, FL and XH performed data analyses; FL, XH, ZJ and DG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their family members for their participation in this study. This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program (2013CB967502 to ZJ), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81371059 to ZJ), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LR13H120001 to ZJ), Zhejiang Provincial & Ministry of Health research fund for medical sciences (201472911 to ZJ), National Key Clinical Specialty (Ophthalmology), Wenzhou Science and Technology Foundation (Y20140358 to XH) and Scientific Research Project of Wenzhou Medical University (wyx201401035 to FL).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, The State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base and Key Laboratory of Vision Science, Ministry of Health
(2)
Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University

References

  1. Kohl S, Marx T, Giddings I, Jagle H, Jacobson SG, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, et al. Total colourblindness is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the alpha-subunit of the cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel. Nat Genet. 1998;19(3):257–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Manitto MP, Roosing S, Boon CJ, Souied EH, Bandello F, Querques G. Clinical utility gene card for: autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kohl S, Baumann B, Broghammer M, Jagle H, Sieving P, Kellner U, et al. Mutations in the CNGB3 gene encoding the beta-subunit of the cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated channel are responsible for achromatopsia (ACHM3) linked to chromosome 8q21. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(14):2107–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kohl S, Baumann B, Rosenberg T, Kellner U, Lorenz B, Vadala M, et al. Mutations in the cone photoreceptor G-protein alpha-subunit gene GNAT2 in patients with achromatopsia. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71(2):422–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang B, Grau T, Dangel S, Hurd R, Jurklies B, Sener EC, et al. A homologous genetic basis of the murine cpfl1 mutant and human achromatopsia linked to mutations in the PDE6C gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(46):19581–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohl S, Coppieters F, Meire F, Schaich S, Roosing S, Brennenstuhl C, et al. A nonsense mutation in PDE6H causes autosomal-recessive incomplete achromatopsia. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;91(3):527–32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wissinger B, Gamer D, Jagle H, Giorda R, Marx T, Mayer S, et al. CNGA3 mutations in hereditary cone photoreceptor disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(4):722–37.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Li S, Huang L, Xiao X, Jia X, Guo X, Zhang Q. Identification of CNGA3 mutations in 46 families: common cause of achromatopsia and cone-rod dystrophies in Chinese patients. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(9):1076–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang X, Wang H, Cao M, Li Z, Chen X, Patenia C, et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies ALMS1, IQCB1, CNGA3, and MYO7A mutations in patients with leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Mutat. 2011;32(12):1450–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Thiadens AA, den Hollander AI, Roosing S, Nabuurs SB, Zekveld-Vroon RC, Collin RW, et al. Homozygosity mapping reveals PDE6C mutations in patients with early-onset cone photoreceptor disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;85(2):240–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Buermans HPJ, den Dunnen JT. Next generation sequencing technology: advances and applications. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842(10):1932–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bamshad MJ, Ng SB, Bigham AW, Tabor HK, Emond MJ, Nickerson DA, et al. Exome sequencing as a tool for Mendelian disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(11):745–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji W, Liu T, Tikhonova IR, Zumbo P, et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(45):19096–101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ng SB, Turner EH, Robertson PD, Flygare SD, Bigham AW, Lee C, et al. Targeted capture and massively parallel sequencing of 12 human exomes. Nature. 2009;461(7261):U153–272.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Lam K, Guo H, Wilson GA, Kohl S, Wong F. Identification of variants in CNGA3 as cause for achromatopsia by exome sequencing of a single patient. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(9):1212–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shaikh RS, Reuter P, Sisk RA, Kausar T, Shahzad M, Maqsood MI, et al. Homozygous missense variant in the human CNGA3 channel causes cone-rod dystrophy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015;23(4):473–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang XF, Huang F, Wu KC, Wu J, Chen J, Pang CP, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation and mutation spectrum in a large cohort of patients with inherited retinal dystrophy revealed by next-generation sequencing. Genet Med. 2015;17(4):271–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelley L, Mezulis S, Yates CM, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gofman Y, Scharfe C, Marks DS, Haliloglu T, Ben-Tal N. Structure, dynamics and implied gating mechanism of a human cyclic nucleotide-gated channel. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10(12):e1003976.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnson S, Michaelides M, Aligianis IA, Ainsworth JR, Mollon JD, Maher ER, et al. Achromatopsia caused by novel mutations in both CNGA3 and CNGB3. J Med Genet. 2004;41(2):e20.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zagotta WN, Siegelbaum SA. Structure and function of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1996;19:235–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Biel M, Seeliger M, Pfeifer A, Kohler K, Gerstner A, Ludwig A, et al. Selective loss of cone function in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel CNG3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(13):7553–7.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohl S, Biskup S. Genetic diagnostic testing in inherited retinal dystrophies. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013;230(3):243–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zelinger L, Cideciyan AV, Kohl S, Schwartz SB, Rosenmann A, Eli D, et al. Genetics and disease expression in the CNGA3 form of achromatopsia steps on the path to gene therapy. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):997–1007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al. 2015

Advertisement