Open Access

Perspective of synaptic protection after post-infarction treatment with statins

  • Johanna Andrea Gutiérrez-Vargas1,
  • Angel Cespedes-Rubio1, 2 and
  • Gloria Patricia Cardona-Gómez1Email author
Journal of Translational Medicine201513:118

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0472-6

Received: 28 October 2014

Accepted: 23 March 2015

Published: 13 April 2015

Abstract

Stroke is the second most common cause of death in people over 45 years of age in Colombia and is the leading cause of permanent disability worldwide. Cerebral ischemia is a stroke characterized by decreased blood flow due to the occlusion of one or more cerebral arteries, which can cause memory problems and hemiplegia or paralysis, among other impairments. The literature contains hundreds of therapies (invasive and noninvasive) that exhibit a neuroprotective effect when evaluated in animal models. However, in clinical trials, most of these drugs do not reproduce the previously demonstrated neuroprotective property, and some even have adverse effects that had not previously been detected in animal experimentation.

Statins are drugs that inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. Several studies have shown that statin therapy in an animal model of focal cerebral ischemia reduces infarct volume, as well as markers of neurodegeneration, activates neuronal survival pathways, and improves performance on learning and memory tests. Given the implied therapeutic benefit and the limited understanding of the mechanism of action of statins in brain repair, it is necessary to address the biochemical and tissue effects of these drugs on synaptic proteins, such as NMDA receptors, synaptic adhesion proteins, and cytoskeletal proteins; these proteins are highly relevant therapeutic targets, which, in addition to giving a structural account of synaptic connectivity and function, are also indicators of cellular communication and the integrity of the blood–brain barrier, which are widely affected in the long term post-cerebral infarct but, interestingly, are protected by statins when administered during the acute phase.

Keywords

Cerebral ischemia Statins Synaptic proteins Synaptic plasticity Post-infarct protection

Introduction

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in industrialized countries [1] and the most common cause of disability in adults worldwide [2]. In Latin America, the main causes of the risk of death are cardiovascular accidents and stroke due to a sedentary lifestyle, diabetes, atherosclerosis, smoking, and hypertension. These diseases also increase the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer and vascular dementia [3].

Industrialized countries have turned their interest to the aforementioned health issues as increasing life expectancy has made them more prevalent in most of the world, becoming the silent epidemic of the current millennium. Developing countries are also increasing their life expectancy, and this disorder is beginning to become a public health problem with few current alternatives for healing.

Cerebral ischemia

Cerebral ischemia is a type of stroke characterized by a transient or permanent reduction in blood flow due to embolic or thrombotic occlusion of one or more cerebral arteries [4,5]. Depending on the duration of the reduced blood flow and infarct location, cerebral ischemia can cause various clinical manifestations, including paralysis or hemiplegia, aphasia, and deficits in learning and memory processes, among other clinical manifestations [6].

If blood vessels that supply blood to all or most of the brain become clogged, the injury is called global ischemia, which usually happens during a heart attack or severe systemic hypotension [7]. However, if only the occlusion of vessels supplying blood to a certain area of the brain occurs, a focal ischemia is generated [8]. Approximately 80% of cases of focal ischemia result from occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) [9].

In focal ischemia, the region that suffers the most severe degree of hypoperfusion progresses rapidly towards irreversible damage due to a necrotic death, which represents the ischemic core. This area exhibits low cerebral blood flow (<10% of the baseline value) and the irreversible failure of energy metabolism [10]. The remaining hypoperfused tissue surrounding the ischemic core has an imbalance in the mechanisms of the autoregulation of blood flow and is known as the penumbra zone [11,12]. In this region, neurons show alterations in functionality, although they retain a minimum metabolic activity that preserves structural integrity for a longer period of time, following a pattern of apoptotic death (Figure 1A) [13,14]. The penumbra is potentially recoverable and, as such, represents a key target for therapeutic intervention in cerebral ischemia [15]; however, unless perfusion is improved or the cells become relatively resistant to the injury, the cells of the penumbra zone are at risk of dying within a few hours by necrosis [10,16].
Figure 1

Neurodegeneration and protection in a focal cerebral ischemia model in rats. A) Histopathology of focal cerebral ischemia (tMCAO) model in rats. a) Panoramic representative image of a whole rat brain with tMCAO injury. b) Contralateral and ipsilateral images from cerebral ischemic rat tissue with Hematoxilin-eosin staining at the −3,80 mm bregma. LH = left hemisphere, RH = Right hemisphere, square = Selected area from CA1 area. Scale bar = 1,7 mm. c), d), e) Left side representative images from Sham rats and Right side representative images from ischemic rats. c) Hematoxilin-eosin staining 100x from CA1 square in b). Scale bar = 50 μm. d) Hyperphosphorylated tau immunoreactivity (AT-8) staining 40X in CA1 area. Scale bar = 70 μm. e) Fluorojade staining 10x. Scale bar = 100 μm. B), C) and D) Comparative hypothetical model of synaptic proteins alteration following cerebral ischemia and Atorvastatin treatment. B) Sham, C) Ischemia and D) ATV-treated ischemia. B) Synaptic complexes formed by proteins of synaptic adhesion (cadherins and catenins), glutamate receptors, and scaffold proteins, such as PSD-95 are associated in a normal condition (Sh = Sham). C) Glutamate receptors are uncoupled from PSD-95 and are accumulated in the cytoplasm due to retention of subunits in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) because of the loss of transport toward synapses due to the alteration of microtubules and the cytoskeleton. Proteins that regulate the cytoskeleton, such as RhoA increased and synaptic complexes formed by the complex cadherins/catenins, glutamate receptors, and post-synaptic proteins, such as PSD-95 are lost. D) Model of protection by statins after cerebral ischemia. Synaptic complexes formed by proteins of synaptic adhesion (cadherins and catenins), glutamate receptors, and scaffold proteins, such as PSD-95 are restored in synapse, inducing neuronal connectivity. ISCH= Ischemia, ATV = Atorvastatin.

Excitotoxicity in cerebral ischemia

The interruption of blood flow into the brain due to ischemia results in the deprivation of oxygen and glucose, reducing the energy available for the operation of brain cells [8]. Neurons in particular become unable to maintain the ion gradients needed for cell function and homeostasis [17], which results in excessive neuronal depolarization, increased release of excitatory neurotransmitters, and reduced capacity of the reuptake of these neurotransmitters by astrocytes. The overloading of glutamate, the main excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS) of mammals, leads to prolonged stimulation of AMPA ionotropic glutamate receptors (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) and NMDA receptors (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid), dramatically increasing the influx of calcium (Ca2+), sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), and water into the neurons [18]. Excessive accumulation of ions and the simultaneous dysregulation of various signaling pathways activate catabolic processes mediated by proteases, lipases, and nucleases, which disrupt neuronal function and lead to cell death [8,17].

Cerebral ischemia and alteration of synaptic proteins

Ionotropic Receptors

After the establishment of neuronal connections during development, the synapse remains highly dynamic and undergoes changes in morphology and efficiency, which are dependent on activity. The presynaptic terminal includes the machinery for neurotransmitter release, while post-synaptic sites include proteins such as neurotransmitter receptors and signaling proteins that promote the response to the released neurotransmitter, which allows the transmission of information (Figures 1B, 2A) [19,20].
Figure 2

Schematic representations of cell signalling alteration following cerebral ischemia and Atorvastatin treatment. A) Sham, B) Ischemia and C) ATV-treated ischemia. A) NMDA receptors, synaptic adhesion proteins and PSD-95 are associated in the synapse. The stability of the actin cytoskeleton is regulated by the RhoGTPasas (Rac, RhoA) balance and microtubules by protein such as MAP2. B) After cerebral ischemia cell adhesion is lost by alteration in the cadherin-catenin complex; NMDA receptors and PSD-95 protein are distributed to the cytoplasm. The increased activity of RhoA, destabilizes actin cytoskeleton and GSK3b activation leads to tau hyperphosphorylation disassembling microtubules. C) Treatment with atorvastatin recovers the adhesion protein complex as well as the location NMDA receptor synapses associated to PSD-95. Additionally atorvastatin leads to AKT activation promoting cell survival. Recovery of the actin cytoskeleton is mediated by the increased activity of Rac and RhoA reduction, and finally atorvastatin stabilize microtubules.

Among neurotransmitter receptors, NMDA receptors have been extensively studied because they represent the largest subclass of glutamate receptors in mammalian excitatory synapses. They consist of four subunits, two of which are NR1 combined with NR2 (NR2A-D) or NR3 (NR3A-B) subunits [21]. These receptors play a central role in synaptic transmission, neuronal plasticity, regulation of neuronal development, and connectivity, as well as in memory and learning processes, primarily due to their permeability to Ca2+ [22-24].

Located at the synapses, the NMDA receptors are not static proteins; in fact, the number and composition of NMDA receptors can be modified, which provides a dynamic mechanism for the regulation of synaptic efficacy and remodeling [25]. Different regions of the receptor, as well as scaffold proteins, such as PSD-95, and other proteins of the postsynaptic density, all participate in the mechanisms of internalization of NMDA. NMDA receptors that bind to PSD-95 are stable in the membrane and are less likely to be internalized (Figures 1B, 2A), while receptors that are not bound to proteins of the postsynaptic density can be readily internalized. This mechanism can “remove” from the membrane surface NMDA receptors that are not permanent at the synapse [26].

The overactivation of NMDA receptors in cerebral ischemia induces excitotoxic cell death. Excessive activation of NMDA induces a rapid and specific transcriptional inhibition of the NR1 subunit promoter in a process that is strictly dependent on Ca2+ influx through the receptor. NR1 transcriptional inhibition results in a progressive reduction of its mRNA, which leads to a progressive reduction of the protein [27]. Overstimulation of NMDA receptors can lead to a progressive decline in receptor activity because its functionality depends strictly on the expression of hetero-oligomers NR1/NR2 on the cell surface [28].

Studies have shown that NR2A and NR2B subunits play different roles in excitotoxic cell death [29]. While inhibition of NR2B induces cell death and prevents motor and cognitive recovery [30], inhibition of the NR2A subunit leads to cell survival in a model of cerebral ischemia [29]. In models of excitotoxicity, it has been seen that excessive activation of the NMDA receptors leads to increased intracellular calcium, which results in the activation of calpain, a protease that mediates cellular toxicity [31,32]. This protease efficiently cuts the C-terminal region of the NR2A and NR2B subunit, producing truncated subunits that lack certain sequences near serine-1303, which are critical to the formation of signaling complexes in the postsynaptic membrane [33]. The end result is the uncoupling of NMDA receptors from scaffolding proteins, such as PSD-95 (Figures 1C, 2B), affecting synaptic function [32].

The results obtained in our research group show that subunits of NMDA receptors are expressed in the cytoplasm following ischemia [30], which may be related to a deficiency in the assembly of the different subunits making up the receiver and/or problems in the transport from the receptor to the synapses (Figure 1C). In the knockout mouse for NR1, both reduction in the dendritic distribution and accumulation in the cytoplasm of the NR2B subunit [34] are observed, perhaps because of the loss of the assembly of functional NMDA receptors to the synaptic membrane or because NMDA receptors with NR2B subunits located in the synaptic density are internalized by endocytosis to perform autoregulation and avoid the continuous influx of calcium. It is known that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a mechanism that regulates the synaptic expression of NMDA receptors containing NR2B during synaptic maturation in processes such as long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) as well as in response to a ligand [35].

Cytoskeletal proteins and cell adhesion

Transport from the receptor to and from synaptic sites may be lost due to alteration of the microtubules and damage to the actin cytoskeleton [36] (Figure 1C), microtubule-associated proteins (MAP2) involved in the regulation of vesicle transport during development or regeneration of neuronal processes [37]. Our work and other previous studies have found that these proteins are redistributed in the soma after the acute post-ischemia period [38,39], which is considered an indicator of excitotoxic damage and loss of microtubule stability [38,39] (Figure 1C). The actin cytoskeleton is primarily mediated by the Rho GTPases, proteins that regulate its maintenance, remodeling, and stability [40]. The RhoA and Rac1 proteins are among the most studied of the Rho GTPases. In general terms, RhoA regulates actin assembly associated with processes of cellular shrinkage due to stress [41,42], while Rac regulates actin polymerization, which is related to axonal growth and stability and the increase of dendritic processes [41,43]. Our research shows that RhoA activity is increased in excitotoxic death processes [44] (Figures 1C, 2B), and inhibiting this activity reduces markers of neurodegeneration as well as improves learning and memory processes in cerebral ischemia [45]. Complementarily, in the acute post-ischemia period (24 hours), Rac1 activity decreases and this protein is redistributed in the soma and in aberrant neuronal processes, which forms part of the process of chronic neurodegeneration [38].

Disassembly of the cytoskeleton in cerebral ischemia mediated by RhoA activation and inactivation of Rac is associated with the disruption of synaptic adhesion mediated by the complex of cadherin/catenins and [40], proteins that are present in both presynaptic and postsynaptic sites. Cadherins promote cell adhesion, and their association with catenins allows the control of different intracellular signaling pathways [19,46,47]. Structurally, cadherins have an extracellular domain comprising most of the polypeptide chain, generally composed of five repetitions, four of which are capable of binding extracellular calcium. This extracellular domain mediates calcium-dependent homophilic interactions with cadherins of adjacent neurons. The cytoplasmic region includes the binding sites to a variety of proteins, including catenins [48]. Catenins are cytosolic proteins that are basically subdivided into three groups: β-catenin, α N-catenin, and p120 catenin (p120 ctn). The distal region of the cadherin’s cytoplasmic domain includes the binding site for β-catenin, while the nearest region to the membrane contains the binding site for family members of p120 ctn. The protein α N-catenin binds to the complex by binding with β-catenin [19].

In our recent studies using a model of focal ischemia in rats, the levels of N-cadherin, p120 catenin, and N catenin in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus were significantly reduced, as was their association with PSD-95 and glutamate receptors (NMDA and AMPA) (Figures 1C, 2B), which represents the loss of synaptic adhesion and of complexes associated with synaptic plasticity [44]. Additionally, there was an interdependence between Rac activity and the N catenin distribution in dendrites, which was lost in the event of glutamate excitotoxicity in primary neuronal cultures [49].

Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) is an essential protein downstream of Akt that is involved in the pathological process of brain damage. The PI3K/Akt signal transduction pathway may affect the activity of GSK-3β. Active Akt inhibits GSK-3β activity via phosphorylation [50]. Sustained activation of GSK-3β is pro-apoptotic in cerebral ischemia, because this leads to hyperphosphorylation of tau, microtubule destabilization (Figure 2B) and cognitive impairment.

The foregoing are some of the cellular and biochemical events underlying the impairment and neuronal death after cerebral ischemia; however, it is important to understand the precise mechanisms of the proteins involved in the synapse, and their implication in morphological and functional recovery. Such knowledge is invaluable in the development of effective neuroprotective strategies to achieve an improved clinical outcome, which results not only in survival but also in a higher quality of life for patients who suffer acute cerebrovascular events, and to reduce or prevent long-term physical and mental consequences.

Statins as treatment after a cerebral ischemia

The pharmacological approach for inducing neuroprotection after an injury due to cerebral ischemia aims at blocking signaling pathways that trigger cell death, to induce synaptic connectivity, and functional recovery. The main goal is to limit the devastating consequences of reduced blood flow in the penumbra zone induced by reperfusion [14,51].

Statins are the drugs of choice for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia that lower low density lipoproteins (LDL) and triglycerides [52]. The mechanism of action of these drugs is via competitive and selective inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis because it is responsible for the conversion of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA to mevalonate, which is a precursor of cholesterol [52,53]. Studies such as the Heart Protection Study, in which statin therapy significantly reduces the coronary mortality rate and incidence of stroke, confirm the need for strict control of the lipid profile to reduce the overall risk and the mortality rate caused by cardiovascular diseases and stroke [54]. Also, a recently completed clinical trial, NCT02225834 in phase IV, used Atorvastatin as acute stroke treatment to evaluate separate effects on immunoinflamatory markers and atherothorombosis; or a recently terminated clinical trial, NCT01364220 in phase III, used Rosuvastatin on early window for preventing recurrence of ischemic stroke.

However, in addition to their effect on the lipid profile, statins are also credited with effects that are independent of the reduction of cholesterol synthesis, called pleiotropic effects. By inhibiting the conversion of hydroxy-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) to L-mevalonate, statins block the synthesis of important isoprenoids, such as farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), which are important intermediates for the post-translational modification of Rho GTPases (RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42) [53]. Among the pleiotropic effects reported in cerebral ischemia are the improvement of endothelial function, the stability of the atherosclerotic plaque, the attenuation of oxidative stress and inflammation, and the inhibition of the thrombogenic response [53]. Previous studies conducted on cerebral ischemia showed that statins improve neurological function and increase cerebral blood flow [55-57], mitigating the effects of inflammation and post-traumatic hypoperfusion [53], in addition to protecting blood vessels and promoting the processes of angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and synaptogenesis after cerebral ischemia [58].

Using an embolic model, simvastatin-treated rats showed a significant infarct volume reduction and neurological improvement compared to vehicle-treated group. Analyzing their homogenated brains by two-dimensional fluorescence Difference in Gel Electrophoresis (DIGE) technology, observed that the protective effect of simvastatin can be attributable to oxidative stress response attenuation and blood–brain barrier protection after cerebral ischemia [59]. There are some additional evidences in humans, where the treatment with statins is not only associated to a reduced incidence of stroke but with reduced stroke severity, as well [60]. In a small pilot trial with simvastatin in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), Montaner et al. showed more cases of complete functional recovery after 3 months of treatment with simvastatin (40 mg/day) in comparison with the non-treated group (p < 0.05). The significant improvement was observed on the third day of treatment [61].

A study by Kawashima et al. showed that cerivastatin reduce the stroke-associated infiltration of inflammatory cells, superoxide production in the cerebral parenchyma, and cerebral damage caused by stroke, as well as delay the appearance of stroke-associated symptoms and death in stroke-prone, spontaneously hypertensive rats [62]. Recently, we found that atorvastatin treatment increases the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in an NR2B-dependent manner [30]; this trophic factor is involved in survival [63] and is correlated with motor recovery and with spatial learning and memory (29). We also confirmed that statins activate the PI3K/Akt pathway (Figure 2C) and Ras/Erk, which transduce survival signals and in turn promote synaptic plasticity [44].

Effect of statins on synaptic proteins

In an experimental model of focal cerebral ischemia, we describe that in addition to neurological recovery and the reduction of infarct volume and of neurodegeneration markers, statin therapy during the acute post-ischemia phase achieves the restoration of proteins involved in neuronal connectivity, such as NMDA receptors [30], synaptic adhesion proteins (cadherins and catenins) and cytoskeletal proteins (RhoA and Rac) [44]. Atorvastatin restores the levels of N-cadherin, p120 catenin and N catenin protein in the cerebral cortex and in the hippocampus along with the association of this complex of cadherins/catenins with the PSD-95 protein (Figure 1D) [44]. These findings support the restoration of synaptic complexes in cerebral ischemia following statin therapy. Additionally, we have found that atorvastatin treatment prevents the cytoplasmic distribution of subunits of glutamate receptors (NR1, NR2B NMDA) and recovers their association with PSD-95 and with proteins of synaptic adhesion (Figure 1D) [30]. The latter is related to the recovery of microtubule stability due to statin therapy, as MAP2 immunoreactivity is restored both in the somatosensory cortex and in the hippocampus [30,44], enabling the transport of the receptors and their stability at the synapses (Figure 1 D). The recovery of synaptic molecular complexes that involve NMDA receptors and synaptic adhesion proteins is correlated with a recovery of the motor and spatial learning and memory deficits caused by ischemia [30].

Complementarily, we describe that atorvastatin postischemia treatment tended to reduce RhoA activity which leads to recovery the actin cytoskeleton (Figure 2C) [44]. By down-regulating Rho/Rho kinase signaling pathways, statins increase the stability of eNOS mRNA and induce activation of eNOS through phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt/eNOS pathway restoring endothelial function [64]. The beneficial effects of Akt activation are not limited to eNOS phoshorylation but extend to the promotion of survival neuronal (Figure 2C).

Perspective

It is becoming necessary to advance both theoretically and experimentally in the study of the factors involved in cerebral ischemia and in the rigorous evaluation of the drugs to be used and, with these results, to be able to impact more precisely a population at increased risk of suffering stroke. The purpose is to prevent, block, or meet the needs of the affected community not only in the short-term but also in the medium- and long-term post-cerebral infarct period. This development must be accompanied by training and improving the expertise necessary for diagnosis and for making decisions in clinical treatment inside and outside the therapeutic window as well as by prevention programs designed to reduce neurodegenerative disorders in general and to improve quality of life and access to health services.

According to the above, our work has specifically contributed to elucidating the mechanisms of pathogenesis and therapy in cerebral ischemia as well as to the understanding of the mechanisms and the cellular and molecular targets of protection by statins. Our previous results and the issues raised in this review allow us to recommend from preclinical study in rats that atorvastatin, a drug already on the market for human consumption as a treatment for hypercholesterolemia, could be used as a protective treatment during the first 6 hours post-ischemic infarct. Its administration for at least three days and ideally longer, with attention to the patient’s adherence to the drug and its quality, could potentially reduce or prevent the medium- and long-term severity of neurologic dysfunction and of emotional and cognitive compromise in patients.

Conclusion

In summary, statin therapy after a cerebral infarct blocks the spread of damage and helps to restore brain morphology and functionality, at least based on the induction of trophic factors such as BDNF and of cell adhesion proteins that generate a platform for synaptic proteins, such as PSD-95, and NMDA receptors to settle and generate synaptic connectivity, neurotransmission, and cognitive and motor function recovery.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank AJE for editing the manuscript and Tania Marquez for assistance in maintaining the rat colonies in the SPF vivarium of the University of Antioquia. This research was supported by Colciencias (project # 111545921467); CODI, University of Antioquia, Colombia.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology Area, Group of Neuroscience of Antioquia, School of Medicine, SIU, University of Antioquia UdeA
(2)
Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Group, Department of Animal Health - Faculty of Veterinary Medicine - University of Tolima

References

  1. Lo EH, Dalkara T, Moskowitz MA. Mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:399–415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Donnan GA. International Journal of Stroke. Editorial. Int J Stroke. 2008;3:157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Imfeld P, Bodmer M, Schuerch M, Jick SS, Meier CR. Risk of incident stroke in patients with Alzheimer disease or vascular dementia. Neurology. 2013;81:910–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Briones TL, Suh E, Jozsa L, Woods J. Behaviorally induced synaptogenesis and dendritic growth in the hippocampal region following transient global cerebral ischemia are accompanied by improvement in spatial learning. Exp Neurol. 2006;198:530–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao J, Duan B, Wang DG, Deng XH, Zhang GY, Xu L, et al. Coupling between NMDA receptor and acid-sensing ion channel contributes to ischemic neuronal death. Neuron. 2005;48:635–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kemp JA, McKernan RM. NMDA receptor pathways as drug targets. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5(Suppl):1039–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Traystman RJ. Animal models of focal and global cerebral ischemia. ILAR J. 2003;44:85–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA. Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999;22:391–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Durukan A, Tatlisumak T. Acute ischemic stroke: overview of major experimental rodent models, pathophysiology, and therapy of focal cerebral ischemia. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2007;87:179–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lo EH. A new penumbra: transitioning from injury into repair after stroke. Nat Med. 2008;14:497–500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baron JC. Perfusion thresholds in human cerebral ischemia: historical perspective and therapeutic implications. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;11 Suppl 1:2–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Moustafa RR, Baron JC. Pathophysiology of ischaemic stroke: insights from imaging, and implications for therapy and drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153 Suppl 1:S44–54.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mies G, Iijima T, Hossmann KA. Correlation between peri-infarct DC shifts and ischaemic neuronal damage in rat. Neuroreport. 1993;4:709–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Moskowitz MA, Lo EH, Iadecola C. The science of stroke: mechanisms in search of treatments. Neuron. 2010;67:181–98.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Baron JC, von Kummer R, del Zoppo GJ. Treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Challenging the concept of a rigid and universal time window. Stroke. 1995;26:2219–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lo EH. Experimental models, neurovascular mechanisms and translational issues in stroke research. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153 Suppl 1:S396–405.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Szydlowska K, Tymianski M. Calcium, ischemia and excitotoxicity. Cell Calcium. 2010;47:122–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Won SJ, Kim DY, Gwag BJ. Cellular and molecular pathways of ischemic neuronal death. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2002;35:67–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Arikkath J. Regulation of dendrite and spine morphogenesis and plasticity by catenins. Mol Neurobiol. 2009;40:46–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Allyson J, Dontigny E, Auberson Y, Cyr M, Massicotte G. Blockade of NR2A-containing NMDA receptors induces Tau phosphorylation in rat hippocampal slices. Neural Plast. 2010;2010:340168.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF. The glutamate receptor ion channels. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:7–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Constantine-Paton M, Cline HT, Debski E. Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA receptor in developing visual pathways. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1990;13:129–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Choi DW. Calcium: still center-stage in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:58–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Groc L, Bard L, Choquet D. Surface trafficking of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors: physiological and pathological perspectives. Neuroscience. 2009;158:4–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau CG, Zukin RS. NMDA receptor trafficking in synaptic plasticity and neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:413–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wenthold RJ, Prybylowski K, Standley S, Sans N, Petralia RS. Trafficking of NMDA receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;43:335–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gascon S, Deogracias R, Sobrado M, Roda JM, Renart J, Rodriguez-Pena A, et al. Transcription of the NR1 subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor is down-regulated by excitotoxic stimulation and cerebral ischemia. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:35018–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Monyer H, Sprengel R, Schoepfer R, Herb A, Higuchi M, Lomeli H, et al. Heteromeric NMDA receptors: molecular and functional distinction of subtypes. Science. 1992;256:1217–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Wong TP, Aarts M, Rooyakkers A, Liu L, Lai TW, et al. NMDA receptor subunits have differential roles in mediating excitotoxic neuronal death both in vitro and in vivo. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2846–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gutierrez-Vargas JA, Munoz-Manco JI, Garcia-Segura LM, Cardona-Gomez GP. GluN2B N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor subunit mediates atorvastatin-Induced neuroprotection after focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci Res. 2014;92:1529–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Simpkins KL, Guttmann RP, Dong Y, Chen Z, Sokol S, Neumar RW, et al. Selective activation induced cleavage of the NR2B subunit by calpain. J Neurosci. 2003;23:11322–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gascon S, Sobrado M, Roda JM, Rodriguez-Pena A, Diaz-Guerra M. Excitotoxicity and focal cerebral ischemia induce truncation of the NR2A and NR2B subunits of the NMDA receptor and cleavage of the scaffolding protein PSD-95. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:99–114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guttmann RP, Baker DL, Seifert KM, Cohen AS, Coulter DA, Lynch DR. Specific proteolysis of the NR2 subunit at multiple sites by calpain. J Neurochem. 2001;78:1083–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Fukaya M, Kato A, Lovett C, Tonegawa S, Watanabe M. Retention of NMDA receptor NR2 subunits in the lumen of endoplasmic reticulum in targeted NR1 knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4855–60.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang S, Edelmann L, Liu J, Crandall JE, Morabito MA. Cdk5 regulates the phosphorylation of tyrosine 1472 NR2B and the surface expression of NMDA receptors. J Neurosci. 2008;28:415–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Dehmelt L, Halpain S. The MAP2/Tau family of microtubule-associated proteins. Genome Biol. 2005;6:204.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheetz MP, Pfister KK, Bulinski JC, Cotman CW. Mechanisms of trafficking in axons and dendrites: implications for development and neurodegeneration. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;55:577–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Johanna GV, Fredy CA, David VC, Natalia MV, Angel CR, Patricia CG. Rac1 activity changes are associated with neuronal pathology and spatial memory long-term recovery after global cerebral ischemia. Neurochem Int. 2010;57:762–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoskison MM, Yanagawa Y, Obata K, Shuttleworth CW. Calcium-dependent NMDA-induced dendritic injury and MAP2 loss in acute hippocampal slices. Neuroscience. 2007;145:66–79.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Covington MD, Burghardt RC, Parrish AR. Ischemia-induced cleavage of cadherins in NRK cells requires MT1-MMP (MMP-14). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290:F43–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ridley AJ, Hall A. Distinct patterns of actin organization regulated by the small GTP-binding proteins Rac and Rho. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1992;57:661–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ridley AJ, Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell. 1992;70:389–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Santos Da Silva J, Schubert V, Dotti CG. RhoA, Rac1, and cdc42 intracellular distribution shift during hippocampal neuron development. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;27:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Cespedes-Rubio A, Jurado FW, Cardona-Gomez GP. p120 catenin/alphaN-catenin are molecular targets in the neuroprotection and neuronal plasticity mediated by atorvastatin after focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurosci Res. 2010;88:3621–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Castro-Alvarez JF, Gutierrez-Vargas J, Darnaudery M, Cardona-Gomez GP. ROCK inhibition prevents tau hyperphosphorylation and p25/CDK5 increase after global cerebral ischemia. Behav Neurosci. 2011;125:465–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tai CY, Mysore SP, Chiu C, Schuman EM. Activity-regulated N-cadherin endocytosis. Neuron. 2007;54:771–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Arikkath J, Reichardt LF. Cadherins and catenins at synapses: roles in synaptogenesis and synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2008;31:487–94.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tanaka H, Shan W, Phillips GR, Arndt K, Bozdagi O, Shapiro L, et al. Molecular modification of N-cadherin in response to synaptic activity. Neuron. 2000;25:93–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Posada-Duque RA, Velasquez-Carvajal D, Eckert GP, Cardona-Gomez GP. Atorvastatin requires geranylgeranyl transferase-I and Rac1 activation to exert neuronal protection and induce plasticity. Neurochem Int. 2013;62:433–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Li X, Zhang J, Chai S, Wang X. Progesterone alleviates hypoxic-ischemic brain injury via the Akt/GSK-3beta signaling pathway. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8:1241–6.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mantz J, Degos V, Laigle C. Recent advances in pharmacologic neuroprotection. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:6–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Laws PE, Spark JI, Cowled PA, Fitridge RA. The role of statins in vascular disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;27:6–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang CY, Liu PY, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of statin therapy: molecular mechanisms and clinical results. Trends Mol Med. 2008;14:37–44.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Hamilton-Craig I. The Heart Protection Study: implications for clinical practice. The benefits of statin therapy do not come without financial cost. Med J Aust. 2002;177:407–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Bosel J, Gandor F, Harms C, Synowitz M, Harms U, Djoufack PC, et al. Neuroprotective effects of atorvastatin against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in primary cortical neurones. J Neurochem. 2005;92:1386–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Cimino M, Balduini W, Carloni S, Gelosa P, Guerrini U, Tremoli E, et al. Neuroprotective effect of simvastatin in stroke: a comparison between adult and neonatal rat models of cerebral ischemia. Neurotoxicology. 2005;26:929–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Cimino M, Gelosa P, Gianella A, Nobili E, Tremoli E, Sironi L. Statins: multiple mechanisms of action in the ischemic brain. Neuroscientist. 2007;13:208–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang RL, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. Neurogenesis in the adult ischemic brain: generation, migration, survival, and restorative therapy. Neuroscientist. 2005;11:408–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Campos-Martorell M, Salvador N, Monge M, Canals F, Garcia-Bonilla L, Hernandez-Guillamon M, et al. Brain proteomics identifies potential simvastatin targets in acute phase of stroke in a rat embolic model. J Neurochem. 2014;130:301–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Greisenegger S, Mullner M, Tentschert S, Lang W, Lalouschek W. Effect of pretreatment with statins on the severity of acute ischemic cerebrovascular events. J Neurol Sci. 2004;221:5–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Montaner J, Chacon P, Krupinski J, Rubio F, Millan M, Molina CA, et al. Simvastatin in the acute phase of ischemic stroke: a safety and efficacy pilot trial. Eur J Neurol. 2008;15:82–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kawashima S, Yamashita T, Miwa Y, Ozaki M, Namiki M, Hirase T, et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor has protective effects against stroke events in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Stroke. 2003;34:157–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Chen J, Zhang C, Jiang H, Li Y, Zhang L, Robin A, et al. Atorvastatin induction of VEGF and BDNF promotes brain plasticity after stroke in mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:281–90.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Tousoulis D, Oikonomou E, Siasos G, Stefanadis C. Statins in heart failure–With preserved and reduced ejection fraction. An update. Pharmacol Ther. 2014;141:79–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gutiérrez-Vargas et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.