Skip to main content

Rationale for key elements of Sino-American collaboration in clinical research

When new scientific discoveries are properly evaluated within the translational research continuum and definitive evidence is generated regarding the balance of benefits and risks associated with therapeutic interventions, dramatic health improvements are seen both for individuals and populations. Until recently, however, technological limitations dictated that definitive evidence could be generated for only a fraction of interventions under development, because clinical investigation was limited by geography and access to expertise. Today, less than 15% of major medical decisions are informed by high-quality evidence [1]. Furthermore, increasing knowledge about the roles played by genetics and practice environments demonstrates that we must develop multinational studies to generate evidence relevant to particular biological and cultural contexts [2]. It is now time to begin to plan for a global learning health system.

Modern informatics and information technology have enabled the sharing of research data without regard to geographic boundaries. These new capabilities expand the concept of human biomedical research from an activity conducted in a limited number of specialized centers to a global activity accessible to all patient populations and qualified practitioners [3]. With appropriate informatics support, shared protocols, and facilitative cultural elements, common diseases can be studied on a larger scale and clinical trials in rare diseases will be able to accrue adequate sample sizes, enabling valid inferences to be drawn. In essence, the limits on knowledge generation will henceforth be determined by two key factors: (1) the number of qualified individuals in the clinical and translational research workforce and (2) the degree to which regulatory and funding sources encourage broad-scale collaboration.

Examples of therapeutic areas where progress could be accelerated include diabetes (which affects global populations in large numbers), congenital heart disease (which affects 1% of all global populations) and Pompe disease (a rare disease with a new effective therapy). In each case, collaborative studies between China and the United States—two of the world’s largest funders of biomedical research—could provide the example to stimulate similar activity on a global scale.

We propose that five key programs specific to clinical and translational research [4] (Table 1) will need to train and educate a vast workforce over the coming decade in order to capitalize on these technological advances.

Table 1 Key programs for clinical & translational research

References

  1. 1.

    Tricoci P, Allen JM, Kramer JM, Califf RM, Smith SC: Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines. JAMA. 2009, 301: 831-841. 10.1001/jama.2009.205. Erratum in: JAMA 2009, 301:1544

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Califf RM, Zarin DA, Kramer JM, Sherman RE, Aberle LH, Tasneem A: Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010. JAMA. 2012, 307: 1838-1847. 10.1001/jama.2012.3424.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dzau VJ, Ackerly DC, Sutton-Wallace P, Merson MH, Williams RS, Krishnan KR, Taber RC, Califf RM: The role of academic health science systems in the transformation of medicine. Lancet. 2010, 375: 949-953. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61082-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    CMS Innovation: Health Care Innovation Awards: Project Profiles – Duke University. [http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/innovation-awards/project-profiles.html]

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M Califf.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Califf, R.M. Rationale for key elements of Sino-American collaboration in clinical research. J Transl Med 10, A4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-10-S2-A4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Congenital Heart Disease
  • Translational Research
  • Global Population
  • Definitive Evidence
  • Pompe Disease