Open Access

Is Melanoma a stem cell tumor? Identification of neurogenic proteins in trans-differentiated cells

  • Suraiya Rasheed1Email author,
  • Zisu Mao,
  • Jane MC Chan and
  • Linda S Chan2
Journal of Translational Medicine20053:14

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-3-14

Received: 19 January 2005

Accepted: 22 March 2005

Published: 22 March 2005

Abstract

Background

Although several genes and proteins have been implicated in the development of melanomas, the molecular mechanisms involved in the development of these tumors are not well understood. To gain a better understanding of the relationship between the cell growth, tumorigenesis and differentiation, we have studied a highly malignant cat melanoma cell line that trans-differentiates into neuronal cells after exposure to a feline endogenous retrovirus RD114.

Methods

To define the repertoire of proteins responsible for the phenotypic differences between melanoma and its counterpart trans-differentiated neuronal cells we have applied proteomics technology and compared protein profiles of the two cell types and identified differentially expressed proteins by 2D-gel electrophoresis, image analyses and mass spectrometry.

Results

The melanoma and trans-differentiated neuronal cells could be distinguished by the presence of distinct sets of proteins in each. Although approximately 60–70% of the expressed proteins were shared between the two cell types, twelve proteins were induced de novo after infection of melanoma cells with RD114 virus in vitro. Expression of these proteins in trans-differentiated cells was significantly associated with concomitant down regulation of growth promoting proteins and up-regulation of neurogenic proteins (p = < 0.001). Based on their physiologic properties, >95% proteins expressed in trans-differentiated cells could be associated with the development, differentiation and regulation of nervous system cells.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the cat melanoma cells have the ability to differentiate into distinct neuronal cell types and they express proteins that are essential for self-renewal. Since melanocytes arise from the neural crest of the embryo, we conclude that this melanoma arose from embryonic precursor stem cells. This model system provides a unique opportunity to identify domains of interactions between the expressed proteins that halt the tumorigenic potential of melanoma cells and drive them toward neurogenerative pathways involved in early neurogenesis. A better understanding of these proteins in a well-coordinated signaling network would also help in developing novel approaches for suppression of highly malignant tumors that arise from stem-like embryonic cells.

Background

Melanomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors that arise in the skin, eye, meninges and other parts of the body. While early stages of cutaneous melanomas are recognized by changes in the size, shape or color of black nevi, most cancer cells grow downward from the skin and invade neighboring tissues before they are detected as highly metastatic tumors in lymph nodes or other organs [1]. Patients with malignant melanomas do not respond well to the currently available therapies and most treatments remain ineffective.

To gain a better understanding of mechanisms involved in the growth, differentiation and transformation of cells, we have studied a fully differentiated (pigmented) highly malignant cat melanoma cell line CT1413, that trans-differentiates into neuronal cells, 48–72 hours after infection with the endogenous cat retrovirus RD114 in vitro [2, 3]. The trans-differentiated cells exhibit long multipolar cytoplasmic extensions that form a network of connections with giant multinucleated neuronal cells and smaller glial-like cells (Fig. 1A, B &1C). This transformation is a highly specific event for CT1413 cells and its interaction with RD114 virus since no morphological change occurs when these cells are treated with various chemicals known to induce cell differentiation (dexamethasone, insulin, isobutyl-methyl-xathine) or they are infected separately with primate retroviruses that use the same neutral amino acid (NAA) transporter proteins as receptors as does RD114 virus [4, 3]. In addition, human, mouse and hamster melanoma cell lines infected with RD114 virus, or CT1413 cells infected with the feline or murine leukemia viruses also fail to exhibit any change in cellular morphology.
Figure 1

Photographs of the cat melanoma cell cultures before and after trans-differentiation. A: Uninfected control melanoma cells 48 hours after culture. B & C: Two different cultures of trans-differentiated neuronal cells, 48–72 hours after infection with the endogenous feline retrovirus RD114.

Since RD114 virus does not replicate in the terminally trans-differentiated neuronal cells, we hypothesized that binding of virus to its receptor on the melanoma cell membrane could induce conformational changes that generate a cascade of molecular interactions through distinct signals which arrest the tumor cell growth and drive them toward neurogenetic pathways. To test this hypothesis we have analyzed comprehensive protein profiles of both the malignant melanoma and its counterpart trans-differentiated neuronal cells by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE) and identified differentially expressed proteins in the two cell types by Matrix-Assisted-Laser-Desorption-Ionization-Time-Of-Flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Herein we show that the trans-differentiation of melanoma into neuronal cells is directly associated with de novo expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, neuro-regulatory enzymes/kinases, neurotrophic factors and concomitant suppression of growth-promoting proteins. This repertoire of proteins is not only responsible for the generation of neuronal cells but it is also involved in the reversion of a highly malignant tumor into non-cancerous neuronal cells.

Results and Discussion

We have compared 3129 protein spots in 15 gels derived from RD114-infected and uninfected melanoma cells from two independent experiments and analyzed peptide fingerprints of 467 differentially expressed (up-regulated and downregulated) protein spots by MALDI-TOF-MS. A total of 46 proteins were confirmed unambiguously from 302 spots excised from multiple gels of both experiments (Figure 2). The remaining 165 spots did not identify any protein from the SWISS-PROT database or proteins were not identified reproducibly from corresponding spots in different gels. Since species-specific isomers and protein-protein interactions in cat cells may be functionally different from those of human or other species, all 46 proteins reported here were confirmed from the feline protein database.
Figure 2

46 proteins identified by MALDI-TOF-MS from multiple gels derived both from melanoma and neuronal cells. X-axis = Protein names (abbreviations): Y-axis = frequency or # of times a protein is detected and confirmed by mass spectrometry from multiple gels. Pink bars represent proteins in neuronal cells and Blue bars indicate proteins present in melanoma cells. Protein names, abbreviations and accession numbers are from SWISS-PROT database used for protein identification (See Table 1-3 for details). One asterisk (*) indicates that the protein is detected in single, non-complexed form only in neuronal cells and two asterisks (**) indicate that this protein is detected as single protein only in melanoma cells. A: From left to right, expression of 12 proteins detected exclusively in trans-differentiated neuronal cells; 3 proteins were detected in single (non-complexed) form only and are marked by (*) and 9 proteins were expressed as complexes with other proteins. B: Two proteins were detected in melanoma cells only (i.e. NOT detected in neuronal cells); CDNA was expressed as a single protein (**) and MMO7 was present in a complex form. C: Expression frequencies of 32 proteins expressed both in melanoma and neuronal cells. Left side of the graph displays proteins that are detected at higher frequency in melanoma and the right side shows proteins that are detected at a higher frequency in trans-differentiated neuronal cells.

Table 1

Proteins Expressed Exclusively in Neuronal Cells

Protein Name

Abbreviation

Accession #

Functional Category

Acetylcholinesterase precursor

ACES

O62763

Membrane Enzyme

Beta-2 adrenergic receptor

B2AR

Q9TST5

Membrane Receptor

Beta-hexosaminidase beta chain precursor

HEXB

P49614

Lysosomal Enzyme

Interleukin-1 receptor beta precursor

IL1B

P41687

Cytokine Receptor

Interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain precursor

IL2A*

P41690

Cytokine Receptor

Interleukin-6 precursor

IL6*

P41683

Cytokine

Interferon gamma precursor

ING

P46402

Cytokine

Macrophage colony stimulating factor I receptor precursor

KFMS

P13369

Membrane tyrosine kinase Receptor

Major allergen I polypeptide chain 2 precursor

FEL2

P30440

Cytoplasmic Cat Allergen

Lipoprotein lipase precursor

LIPL

P55031

Membrane Enzyme

Red-sensitve opsin

OPSR

O18913

Sensory Retinal protein

Proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase pim-1

PIM1*

Q95LJ0

Serine Threonine Kinase

B:

   

Proteins Expressed Exclusively in Melanoma cells

   

Protein Name

Abbreviation

Accession #

Functional Category

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1

CDNA**

O19002

Nuclear Cell Cycle Protein

Matrilysin precursor

MMO7

P55032

Membrane Enzyme

A: shows 12 proteins that were expressed exclusively in neuronal cells (ACES, B2AB, FEL-2, HEXB, IL1B, IL2A*, IL6*, ING, KFMS, LIPL, CPSR and PIM1). One asterisk (*) indicates that the protein is detected in single, non-complexed form in neuronal cells only. B: lists two proteins (CDNA** and MMO7) that were expressed exclusively in melanoma (i.e. not detected in trans-differentiated neuronal cells. Two asterisks (**) indicate that the protein is detected in single, non-complexed form in melanoma cells only.

Table 2

Higher Detection Frequency in Neuronal Cells

Protein Name

Abbreviation

Accession #

Functional Category

Alkaline Phosphatase

PPBT

Q29486

Membrane Phosphatase

Aminopeptidase N

AMPN

P79171

Membrane Enzyme

Arylsulfatase B precursor

ARSB

P33727

Lysosomal Enzyme

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor precursor

BDNF*

Q9TST3

Neurotrophic Factor

Cellular tumor suppressor p53

P53*

P41685

Nuclear

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV

DPP4

Q9N2I7

Membrane Enzyme

Glutamate decarboxylase, 67 kDa isoform

DCEI

P14748

Cytoplasmic Enzyme

Integrin beta-1 precursor

ITB1

P53713

Membrane Receptor

Interleukin-1 beta convertase precursor

ICE1

Q9MZV6

Cytoplasmic Enzyme

Lysosomal alpha-mannosidase precursor

M2B1

O46432

Lysosomal Enzyme

Major prion protein precursor

PRIO

O18754

Membrane Prion Protein

Mast/stem cell growth factor receptor precursor

KIT

Q28889

Membrane Tyrosine Kinase Receptor

NADH-Ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5

NU5M

P48921

Mitochondrial Enzyme

Polycomb complex protein BMI-1

BMI1

Q9TST0

Nuclear Protein

Pyruvate kinase, M1 isozyme

KPYM

P11979

Pyruvate Kinase

Serum albumin precursor***

ALBU*

P49064

Cytoplasmic Albumin Protein

Sodium/calcium exchanger 1 precursor

NAC1

P48767

Membrane Calcium Ion Channel (Plasma Membrane)

T-cell surface glycoprotein CD8 beta chain precursor

CD8B

P79336

Membrane Receptor

Toll-like receptor 4 precursor

TLR4

P58727

Membrane Receptor

Transferrin receptor protein 1

TFR1

Q9MYZ3

Membrane Receptor

Zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 2 precursor

ZP2*

P47984

Membrane Receptor

Zona pellucida sperm-binding protein B precursor

ZP4

P48834

Membrane Receptor

Proteins with higher frequency of detection in complex forms in neuronal cells compared to melanoma. Ten proteins were detected in single as well as in complex forms in both melanoma and neuronal cells. These proteins displayed a higher frequency of detection in neuronal cells than in melanoma. Four proteins Fel d 2 /ALBU*, BDNF*, tumor suppressor protein (P53*) and zona pellucida-2 (ZP2*) were detected both in single (*) and complex forms only in neuronal cells. These proteins were present only in complexes in melanoma cells. The ALBU and P53* proteins also showed increased frequency of detection in the neuronal cells than in melanoma (also see Fig 2C*) and BDNF and ZP2 showed similar detection frequencies in the two cell types.

Table 3

Lower Detetion Frequency in Neuronal Cells

Protein Name

Abbreviation

Accession #

Functional Category

Beta-glucuronidase precursor

BGLR

O97524

Lysosomal Enzyme

Cathepsin W precursor

CATW

Q9TST1

Lysosomal Enzyme

Neurotrophin-3 precursor

NT3

Q9TST2

Neurotrophic Favtor

Phosducin

PHOS

P41686

Cytoplasmic Phosducin

Platelet-derived growth factor, B chain precursor

PDGB

P12919

Growth Factor

Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase

FES

P14238

Tyrosine Kinase (Cytoplasmic/Transmembrane)

Sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2

ATA2

Q00779

Membrane Calcium Ion Channel (Endoplasmic Reticulum)

Serine – pyruvate aminotransferase, mitochondrial precursor

SPYA

P41689

Mitochondrial Enzyme

Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 5

TNF5

O97605

Cytokine

Zona pellucida sperm-binding protein 3 precursor

ZP3

P48832

Membrane Receptor

Proteins that were detected at lower frequencies in neuronal cells (also see Fig 2 C)

By mass spectrometry each gel spot contained either a single protein per spot in a non-complexed form or as a complex of 2–8 proteins in one spot. The frequency of distribution for the 46 proteins among the 302 spots included 82 single protein spots (32 in melanoma and 50 in neuronal cells) and 220 spots containing protein complexes (103 in melanoma and 117 in neuronal cells.

Among the differentially identified proteins, 12 were expressed de novo exclusively in neuronal cells, two were detected only in melanoma cells and 32 of 46 (>69%) proteins were shared between the two cell types (Table 1, 2, 3 and Fig 2). Three of the 12 de novo expressed proteins in neuronal cells were detected in single, non-complexed form (designated by * in Table 1 and Fig. 2A) and 9 proteins were detected in complexes with other proteins (Fig. 2A). All newly synthesized or upregulated proteins belonged to families of cytokines, neuro-regulatory enzymes/ kinases, sensory, and other signaling proteins (Tables 1, 2, 3). The two proteins that were expressed only in melanoma but not in any of the gels derived from neuronal cells were cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1 (P21-CDNA**) expressed in a non complexed /single form and matrilysin or matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMO7) (Fig. 2B; Table 1B). These proteins have been shown to be critical for maintaining cell growth and metastasis respectively [5, 6]. The binomial probability for the distribution of the 12 newly expressed proteins in the trans-differentiated cells compared to melanoma was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test p = 0.007).

Tables 2 and 3 show proteins that are expressed both in melanoma and neuronal cells. Of the 32 shared proteins in melanoma and trans-differentiated neuronal cells, 10 were detected in single as well as in complex forms, 21 proteins were present in complex forms and one protein, the T-cell surface glycoprotein CD8 beta chain (CD8B) was detected in a single form in both cell types but the complex form of this protein was present only in the neuronal cells (Tables 2 &3 ; Fig. 2C). Each of the 32 proteins derived from both melanoma and neuronal cells have been compared and grouped according to their mean/-normalized quantities (i.e. upregulated or down regulated) or according to their higher or lower frequency of detection (i.e. # of times each protein is detected in multiple gel spots). However, no functional significance has been implied in grouping these proteins (Tables 1, 2,3).

Analyses of known physiological functions for each of the 46 proteins indicated that 44 of 46 proteins (>95%) expressed in neuronal cells have been shown previously to be associated with the early stages of brain development, differentiation and regulation of nervous system. Based on these biological functions, we have proposed possible roles of these 46 proteins in signaling antiviral responses, arrest in tumor cell growth, modulation of cell membranes and in altering the signal transduction pathways from malignancy to early neurogenesis and cell differentiation (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Tentative Signal Transduction Pathways involved in suppression of tumorigenesis and induction of neurogenetic pathways. Proposed protein functions are based on previously published reports.

Antiviral Responses and Arrest in Tumor Growth

The first line of defense against the RD114 virus infection begins with conformational changes in the melanoma cell membrane due to binding of the viral envelope glycoproteins to its receptor, the NAA transporter protein [4]. The presence of metalloprotease /aminopeptidase (AMPN) on the melanoma cell surface can increase heterodimer formation as it cleaves NAAs from the N-terminus of proteins [7]. The toll-like receptor-4 (Tl-4) recognizes pattern changes in membrane proteins and triggers the innate immunity while the antiviral responses are activated by de novo expression of interferon gamma (ING) in the presence of tumor necrosis factor (TNF5) and interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme (ICE1) that were already present in melanoma cells (Fig. 2A&2C). This activates de novo synthesis of IL-1 receptor beta (IL-1B), IL-2 receptor alpha chain (IL2A) and IL-6, all of which produce anti-tumorigenic and inflammatory responses. Co-expression of ING, IL-6 and other newly synthesized cytokines prompts proteases (AMPN, ICE1 and dipeptidyl peptidase VI (DPP IV/CD26) to functionally activate these proteins by cleavage [7]. A series of interactions are then initiated by the activated IL-1B and IL-6 toward the suppression of metastatic activity and arrest of melanoma cell growth [8, 9]. At this time, two other proteins CDNA/ p21 and MM07 that are essential for tumor growth and metastasis respectively are downregulated and are not detected in trans-differentiated neuronal cells i.e. after the exposure of cat melanoma cells to RD114 virus (Fig. 2B). Suppression of these proteins was associated with concurrent expression of P53 tumor suppressor protein as a distinct single protein in neuronal cells indicating its inhibitory effect on the tumor growth (Fig 2C *). Thus, the antiviral responses of the newly induced cytokines and growth regulatory proteins affect the arrest of tumor cell growth, which then trigger production of neurotrophic factors that alter the pathways responsible for modulation of neurogenesis.

Activation of kinases, neuro-regulatory enzymes and neurotrophic factors

Both IL-1B and IL-6 are multipotential cytokines capable of activating kinases necessary for phosphorylation of factors involved in the transcription of new genes, synthesis of novel proteins, up-regulation or down-regulation of many existing proteins that enhance signals for tumor suppression and neurogenesis. The cytoplasmic kinase of IL-6 acts synergistically in stimulating production of other kinases and receptors in a ligand-independent manner [10]. In addition, the Pim1 serine/ threonine kinase is expressed as a single non-complexed protein exclusively in neuronal cells (Fig. 2A *; Table 1 group A). This kinase phosphorylates proteins in dendritic and nuclear compartments of stimulated neurons and it is required for long-term potentiation of these cells [11]. The red-sensitive opsin receptor (OPSR) that is normally found in retinal rods is expressed de novo in transdifferentiated neuronal cells after exposure of melanoma cells to the RD114 virus (Fig. 2A). This integral membrane protein is phosphorylated on most of its serine and threonine residues present at its C-terminus [12]. It is possible that proteins that are phosphorylated at the serine or threonine residues may also be phosphorylated at tyrosine residues at acidic pH and these may generate distinct neurogenerative pathways [8].

While both melanoma and neuronal cells expressed the mast/stem cell growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase Kit (C-Kit), the frequency of detection for this kinase was significantly higher in neuronal cells compared to melanoma (Fig. 2C). Co-expression of c-Kit with IL-6, IL-2A and IL-B in trans-differentiated cells can further retard tumor growth while promoting cell signaling, differentiation and potentiation of synapses in conjunction with other proteins . The membrane tyrosine kinase receptor (KFMS) for the macrophage colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) was expressed exclusively in neuronal cells and this protein has been shown to protect neural cells from degeneration [13, 14]. The FES tyrosine protein kinase was already present in melanoma cells at the time of trans-differentiation and this proto-oncogene has been implicated in morphological differentiation of neuronal cells[15]. The signals produced by IL6 and other cytokines activate brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF*), a protein critical for intracellular protein-protein interactions that result in the development, differentiation, plasticity, and regeneration of neuronal network in the brain [15]. BDNF has recently been shown to be critical for neuronal self-repair following ischemia due to stroke and it contributes to the functional recovery of neurons [1618].

BDNF binds to tyrosine kinase receptor with a high affinity [19]. It can also auto-phosphorylate and activate other signaling molecules. In our model system BDNF was over-expressed in trans-differentiated cells and it was detected in gel spots both as a single protein and in the form of complexes (Table 2: Figure 2C). Concurrent expression of several kinases, cytokines and growth factors in neuronal cells appears to have enhanced a network of protein-protein interactions between different proteins present in the cell. This is evident by the detection of a large number of detergent-soluble complexes of proteins in these cells (Fig. 2A,B&2C).

Analyses of all complexed proteins containing BDNF (Fig. 4A&4B) indicated that 4 of 5 complexes (80%) in neuronal cells and only 1 of 7 complexes (14%) in melanoma interacted with tyrosine kinase Kit (p= 0.072 based on 2-sided Fisher's exact test). It is interesting to note that 1 of the 5 BDNF complexes in neuronal cells that did not contain Kit (not shown in Fig. 4), was found to be associated with ZP3, PDGB and TL-4 which acts as an adapter-like protein for BDNF indicating that it was autophosphorylated in the complex without the Kit. This interaction not only stimulates BDNF activity but together these proteins increase length of neurites [20, 21]. Although the biological significance of all the recovered complexes from melanoma and neuronal cells is not clear yet, our data suggest that most of the detergent soluble complexes that we have isolated represent functionally active rather than randomly aggregated proteins.
Figure 4

Protein complexes as identified by mass spectrometry in single spots. All proteins identified in one complex are drawn by a single color. A represents 4 of the 5 complexes found in trans-differentiated neuronal cells. Each complex contains brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF*) and its interacting partner proteins. Each color in the diagram represents one complex of BDNF with other interacting proteins as identified by mass spectrometry. NOTE that all BDNF-interactive proteins in the 4 complexes in neuronal cells contain Kit tyrosine kinase. B displays proteins in 5 complexes derived from melanoma cells. NOTE that only one complex in melanoma cells contains Kit with no other protein in this complex.

Production of BDNF stimulates expression of acetylcholinesterase (ACES), an enzyme vital for neurite formation and transmission of signals in both the sympathetic and parasympathetic arms of the nervous system [22]. Expression of ACES in glial cells has been associated with the induction of prion (PRIO) protein present in most neural cells [23]. However, since PRIO was already present in melanoma cells and ACES was expressed only after RD114 virus infection, it indicates that ACES does not induce PRIO in these neuronal cells (Fig. 2A&2C). BDNF also activates beta-2 adrenergic receptor (B2AR) in neuronal cells and promotes protein-protein interactions by enhanced binding of different kinases, which trigger astrogliosis and neuronal cell survival [24].

Both beta-hexosaminidase (HEXB) and lipoprotein lipase (LIPL) were expressed de novo in trans-differentiated cells (Fig. 2A). These enzymes not only retard cancer cell growth but are also critical for synaptic remodeling in the brain and affect differentiation of neuronal cells respectively [2527]. The tissue nonspecific isozyme of alkaline phosphatase (PPBT) was expressed with high frequency. This neural cell marker binds to prion protein and it enhances neurotransmission and developmental plasticity [28]. Although PPBT was expressed in both melanoma and neuronal cells its frequency of detection was significantly higher in neuronal cells compared to the tumor cells (Fig. 2 C). Another important enzyme, arylsulfatase (ARSB) that desulfates proteins post-translationally and renders them functional was more frequently expressed in neuronal cells compared to melanoma. This enzyme is important for new glial cells and developing neurons in the brain rather than in mature cells [29].

The pyruvate kinase isoenzyme M1 (KPYM) was downregulated in trans-differentiated cells but its presence is considered important for nerve endings [30]. Likewise the down regulation of neurotrophic factor-3 (NT-3) in neuronal cells is noteworthy since this factor is necessary for the development of mature neurons and enteric nervous system but it is not essential for the generation of newly differentiated neural cells [31]. However, presence of NT-3 has been reported to be essential for enhancement of invasive potential of these tumor cells [17]. Glutamate decarboxylase 67 (DCE1) is a key regulatory enzyme for the neurogenic activity induced by neurotrophic factors [32] and the polycomb complex protein BMI1 is required for stem cell renewal [33] together with Kit, PDGB, NT-3, BDNF and others.

One of the most frequently detected cell membrane proteins, in both melanoma and neuronal cells was integrin VLA-4 beta I subunit (ITB/ CD29). This protein was present in both single and complex forms in both cell types (Fig. 2C). Integrins are cell-surface receptors with multifunctional domains that bind to numerous ligands and transduce signals through a cascade of intracellular events that help in the development of laminae in the central nervous system [34]. In particular, Kit and beta-1 integrins collaborate in modulating cellular functions [35]. During neurogenesis, the synthesis and mobility of integrin is increased by the presence of both BDNF and PDGB [36, 37]. These proteins also redistribute transferrin (TFR1) to the membranes of immature neurons, a process essential for neurite formation, axonal cell growth and for regulation of IL-1B production [38, 39].

The sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2 (ATA2) enzyme was detected with a high frequency in both melanoma and neuronal cells and sodium/calcium exchanger 1 (NAC1) a plasma membrane pump was expressed at a slightly higher frequency in neuronal cells than in melanoma (Fig. 2C). Both proteins are essential for neural development, regulation of intracellular concentration of calcium and maintenance of plasticity and synapses, [40].

Expression of different isomers of zona pellucida (ZP2, ZP3 and ZP4) in both melanoma and neuronal cells was totally unanticipated. Although exact function of these sperm-binding receptor proteins in melanoma or neuronal cells is not known, recent reports suggest that ZP domains particularly those of ZP2 that is upregulated in neuronal cells may transduce intracellular signals necessary for polymerization of proteins into neural filaments required for mechano-sensory dendrites [41, 42]. It is also possible that ZP proteins may participate in the formation of multipolar extensions in trans-differentiated cells during early neurogenesis. Phosducin (PHOS) is an abundant sensory protein and opsin, is a red-sensitive protein expressed in retinal rods, synapses and photoreceptor cells [43]. Expression of both of these neuro-sensory proteins may be involved in transduction of neurogenic signal in trans-differentiated cells.

Conclusion

We have shown that RD114 virus infection of cat melanoma cells induces a repertoire of novel proteins that suppress its tumorigenic potential and promote neuronal cell differentiation in vitro. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that epigenetic stimuli from the cell surface of a naturally occurring melanoma can generate neurogenetic signals that can alter the genome-wide transcriptional and translational programs such that its oncogenic pathways are halted and pro-neuronal auto-regulatory mechanisms are prompted toward neural cell differentiation.

By immunohistochemistry numerous markers of neural cell neoplasms (S-100 protein, neurofilament, epithelial membrane antigen, Leu-7 (CD57), neural specific enolase, neuro-peptide substance P, the low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (p75NGFR), neural cell adhesion molecule (CD56/N-CAM) and growth-associated phosphoprotein-43) have been shown to enhance malignant potential of melanomas and neuronal cell-derived tumors [4446]. In addition, peripherin, an intermediate filament protein is expressed during the transition of a neuronal cell to a Schwann cell phenotype and during the normal maturation of epithelioid melanocytes or melanocytic nevi [47]. Based on the immunohistochemical staining, many different tumor types such as neurotropic or desmoplastic melanomas, neuroepithelial and malignant granular cell tumors have also been grouped together as malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors [48]. None of these proteins was detected in the melanoma or trans-differentiated neuronal cells that we have studied. This could be because we have primarily focused on proteins and profiles (upregulated, down regulated or de novo expressed) that distinguish highly malignant melanoma cells from their counterpart trans-differentiated neuronal cells. Our proteomics studies also emphasize that although a significant number of the expressed proteins are shared between the two cell types, distinct protein-protein interactions are operative in altering signals that lead cells toward tumorigenic or neurogenic pathways.

Expression of >69% of germ-line associated sensory or neurogenic signaling proteins, neural-specific enzymes, cytokines, neurotrophic/ growth factors, serine, threonine and tyrosine kinases in cat melanoma cells as well as in trans-differentiated counterpart cells, supports the stem cell origin of this tumor and suggests that the precursor of this melanoma is a stem-like cell rather than the primitive melanoblast committed to melanocytic differentiation only. These cells are unique in that they are fully differentiated (pigmented) and they have the ability to give rise to new cell types that express differentiation-specific proteins. In addition, these cells express many proteins involved in self-renewal of cells. These include the stem cell growth factor receptor protein (C-Kit), PDGB, BDNF, NT-3, polycomb protein 1 and others. Recently, BMI1 has been shown to be essential for efficient self-renewal of neural stem cells [34, 49]. As can be seen in Fig 2C, BMI 1 and other protein involved in self-renewal are expressed both in melanoma and trans-differentiated neuronal cells but these are upregulated in neuronal cells. Since both melanocytes and neuronal cells arise from the neural crest of the embryo our studies indicate that CT1413 melanoma is a stem cell tumor.

Based on our findings it can also be speculated that a high incidence of cutaneous melanomas and atypical melanocytic nevi in patients with hereditary neurofibroma, astrocytoma, glioma, meningioma, and other neuronal tumors [50], may also arise due to the expression or suppression of specific embryonic stem cell proteins in these cells. Correlation of cellular phenotypes with signature patterns of proteins in response to epigenetic or environmental changes would now be critical in establishing molecular definitions for classifying clinically related tumors.

To gain a better insight into the complex processes of oncogenesis or neurogenesis, it would also be important to identify proteins in various natural biological settings since most substrate proteins are cleaved by proteases prior to enzyme interactions. Defining the specificity of natural targets may throw light on how biological specificities are achieved in nature. This model system offers a unique opportunity to study protein profiles in relation to specific ligand-binding interactions that are capable of inducing genetic or phenotypic changes in these cells. Characterization of protein-protein interaction domains by the use of constitutively active and dominantly negative constructs and screening of small peptides or interfering RNAs would provide new knowledge into functional significance of each of the proteins that direct cells toward distinct pathways (i.e. oncogenic versus neurogenic). These studies would also have important clinical implications for understanding neurogenerative and neuroprotective mechanisms for neurologic disorders since activated proteins may induce changes in protein subunits in a cell-type specific manner. This information would help in identifying selective inhibitors for tumors and activators/co-activators of neurogenic proteins involved in neural cell development.

Materials and Methods

Cell Cultures

A cat melanoma cell line (CT1413) was established in vitro from a highly metastatic and melanotic tumor of the lung [2]. Cells were grown in minimal essential medium (MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum and 2 mM glutamine (growth medium) and were plated in 36 flasks (75 cm2), at a density of 2 × 106 cells/ flask in medium containing 2-ug/ml polybrene [2]. After 24 hrs, culture medium was removed and fresh growth medium containing RD114 virus was added. RD114 is an endogenous retrovirus originally derived from the brain of a young cat and grown in human rhabdomyosarcoma cells [51]. This virus replicates in a wide range of different mammalian cells and does not induce any pathology in healthy cats or in cultures derived from cat embryo cells in vitro [52]. The RD114 virus was added to 12 flasks with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1 and another set of 12 cultures was exposed to MOI of 0.25. An additional set of 12 flasks of melanoma cells was cultured without the virus as uninfected controls. After 48 hours post-virus infections, cultures exposed to MOI of 1 showed neuronal cell morphology and this experiment was highly reproducible [3].

To validate protein profiles two independent cell culture experiments were conducted almost 12 months apart and proteomes of both cell types were analyzed separately for differential expression profiles.

Proteomics Studies

Proteins were extracted from 12 flasks each of the trans-differentiated and counterpart melanoma cells from each of the two experiments. Cells were washed 3× with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove serum and other proteins, and 2 × 107 cells from each set of experimental and control melanoma cells were removed by the use of a cell-scraper or a "rubber policeman" (i.e. not treated with trypsin to detach cells). Each cell pellet was washed again 2× with PBS and proteins were extracted sequentially by a modified two-step solubilization procedure using two reagents containing different concentrations of 5–8 M Urea, 2%–4% CHAPS, 2 M thiourea and other non-ionic and/zwitterionic detergents (BioRad Sequential extraction kit CA, USA). The most soluble membrane proteins were removed in the first extraction and the less soluble proteins were separated in the second fraction. In order to isolate proteins as close to their natural states in cells as possible, each solubilization step was modified by rapid lysis technique (only 10–15 seconds' cell lysis with 2-seconds' sonication) followed by centrifugation for 90 minutes at 100,000 × g prior to analyzing soluble proteins present in the supernatant by isoelectric focusing (IEF).

All protein fractions from melanoma controls and trans-differentiated neuronal cells were analyzed separately by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE). In the first dimension proteins were separated by IEF on a pH gradient 3–10 and then size fractionated in the second dimension on 6–18% gradient of SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Proteins were stained with Coomassie blue and by the use of a CCD camera and an image-processing analytical program (PDQuest from BioRad) all protein spots were evaluated from each of the 15 gels (9 gels from the first experiment and 6 gels from the second experiments). This program compares both the quality and normalized quantity of each spot across 15 gels and creates a master gel-image of well-calibrated and quantifiable spots using internal reference proteins. A master gel containing 3,129 spots was used to compare each of the corresponding spots in all gels derived from melanoma controls and trans-differentiated neuronal cell. All differentially expressed (i.e. upregulated and down-regulated) proteins were identified in each gel and 467 spots including some spots common to both cell types were excised from multiple gels. Proteins were digested using ultra-pure trypsin and peptide fingerprints of each in-gel digest were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS. Full scan mass spectra were acquired and high mass accuracy criteria were used throughout the study with high resolution and strict trypsin specificity. Spectra were submitted to the Protein database (SWISS-PROT) for searching protein identification. In addition to using these stringent criteria, we used manual acquisitions of spectra, which yielded more reliable and reproducible results compared to automated acquisitions using PS1 software. The confidence level in our protein identification was high because almost all proteins were confirmed in corresponding spots in multiple gels and by duplicating the entire experiment for validation. In this study we included only those proteins that were most reproducible in the high stringency Feline Protein database and results were confirmed in other mammalian species (SWISS-PROT). Thus far we have identified 46 proteins among 302 spots from multiple gels tested. All spots in which proteins were not identified reproducibly by mass spectrometry from the same or different gels were NOT included in any analysis.

Statistical Analyses

The frequency distribution between melanoma and neuronal cells was compared using Chi-square test or 2-sided Fisher's exact test. The mean quantity for each protein was compared between melanoma and neuronal cells using the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test and the probability of a protein occurrence in the trans-differentiated neuronal versus melanoma cells was examined based on the binomial probability distribution with an expected proportion less than 0.05.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. S. Martin and J-P. Faulon of Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, for reading the manuscript and their enthusiasm about this research; summer students of 2003–2204 (Steve Doo, Chrissy Hsiao, Arti Ayer, Arvan Chan and Alex Lau, for their technical assistance and excitement while conducting experiments in vitro; David Wei and Arpan Patel for literature searches for protein functions and analyses of protein complexes; Vicky Moreno for assistance in preparing Figure 1A&1B and Elizabeth Parra for preparing tables. The Rasheed Research and Endowment Funds at USC supported this research.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Viral Oncology and Proteomics Research, Department of Pathology, University of Southern California
(2)
Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

References

  1. Rosso S, Zanetti R, Pippione M, Sancho-Garnier H: Parallel risk assessment of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma: skin characteristics and sun exposure. Melanoma Res. 1998, 8: 573-583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Rasheed S: Characterization of a differentiated cat melanoma cell line. Cancer Res. 1983, 43: 3379-3384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rasheed S: Role of endogenous cat retrovirus in cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982, 79: 7371-7375.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rasko JE, Battini JL, Gottschalk RJ, Mazo I, Miller AD: The RD114/simian type D retrovirus receptor is a neutral amino acid transporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999, 96: 2129-2134. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2129.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Trotter MJ, Tang L, Tron VA: Overexpression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(WAF1/CIP1) in human cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Cutan Pathol. 1997, 24: 265-271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McCawley LJ, Matrisian LM: Matrix metalloproteinases: they're not just for matrix anymore!. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001, 13: 534-540. 10.1016/S0955-0674(00)00248-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffmann T, Faust J, Neubert K, Ansorge S: Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD 26) and aminopeptidase N (CD 13) catalyzed hydrolysis of cytokines and peptides with N-terminal cytokine sequences. FEBS Lett. 1993, 336: 61-64. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)81609-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garcia G, Cruz-Conde JC, Boyano MD, Garcia-Vazquez MD, Canavate ML: Effect of IL-2 and IL-6 on parameters related to metastatic activity in a murine melanoma. Pathobiology 2001 ;69 (4 ):230 -6. 2001, 69: 230-236. ;69 (4 ):230 -6Google Scholar
  9. Di Loreto S, Maccarone R, Corvetti L, Sebastiani P, Piancatelli D, Adorno D: Differential modulation of interleukin-6 expression by interleukin-1beta in neuronal and glial cultures. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2003, 14: 97-102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim O, Jiang T, Xie Y, Guo Z, Chen H, Qiu Y: Synergism of cytoplasmic kinases in IL6-induced ligand-independent activation of androgen receptor in prostate cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 1838-1844. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Konietzko U, Kauselmann G, Scafidi J, Staubli U, Mikkers H, Berns A, Schweizer M, Waltereit R, Kuhl D: Pim kinase expression is induced by LTP stimulation and required for the consolidation of enduring LTP. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 3359-3369. 10.1093/emboj/18.12.3359.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nei M, Zhang J, Yokoyama S: Color vision of ancestral organisms of higher primates. Mol Biol Evol. 1997, 14: 611-618.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nohava K, Malipiero U, Frie K, Fontana A: Neurons and neuroblastoma as a source of marcophage colony stimulating factor. Eur J Immunol. 1992, 22: 2539-2545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Loveland KL, Schlatt S: Stem cell factor and c-kit in the mammalian testis: lessons originating from Mother Nature's gene knockouts. J Endocrinol. 1997, 153: 337-344. 10.1677/joe.0.1530337.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Shibata A, Laurent CE, Smithgall TE: The c-Fes protein-tyrosine kinase accelerates NGF-induced differentiation of PC12 cells through a PI3K-dependent mechanism. Cell Signal. 2003, 15: 279-288. 10.1016/S0898-6568(02)00089-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Heese K, Hock C, Otten U: Inflammatory signals induce neurotrophin expression in human microglial cells. J Neurochem. 1998, 70: 699-707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kokaia Z, Lindvall O: Neurogenesis after ischaemic brain insults. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003, 13: 127-132. 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00017-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindvall O, Kokaia Z, Bengzon J, Elmer E, Kokaia M: Neurotrophins and brain insults. Trends Neurosci. 1994, 17: 490-496. 10.1016/0166-2236(94)90139-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gustafsson E, Andsberg G, Darsalia V, Mohapel P, Mandel RJ, Kirik D, Lindvall O, Kokaia Z: Anterograde delivery of brain-derived neurotrophic factor to striatum via nigral transduction of recombinant adeno-associated virus increases neuronal death but promotes neurogenic response following stroke. Eur J Neurosci. 2003, 17: 2667-2678. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02713.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Ding M, Thiele CJ, Luo J: Ethanol inhibits brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated intracellular signaling and activator protein-1 activation in cerebellar granule neurons. Neuroscience. 2004, 126: 149-162.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee SH, Han JH, Choi JH, Huh EY, Kwon YK, Kaang BK: The effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on neuritogenesis and synaptic plasticity in Aplysia neurons and the hippocampal cell line HiB5. Mol Cells. 2003, 15: 233-239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Olivera S, Rodriguez-Ithurralde D, Henley JM: Acetylcholinesterase promotes neurite elongation, synapse formation, and surface expression of AMPA receptors in hippocampal neurones. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003, 23: 96-106. 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00021-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roucou X, Gains M, LeBlanc AC: Neuroprotective functions of prion protein. J Neurosci Res. 2004, 75: 153-161. 10.1002/jnr.10864.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Al-Shamma HA, Arnold AP: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulates expression of androgen receptors in perineal motoneurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997, 94: 1521-1526. 10.1073/pnas.94.4.1521.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Tifft CJ, Proia RL: The beta-hexosaminidase deficiency disorders: development of a clinical paradigm in the mouse. Ann Med. 1997, 29: 557-561.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawamura I, Yamamoto N, Sakai F, Yamazaki H, Goto T: Effect of lipoprotein lipase activators bezafibrate and NO-1886, on B16 melanoma-induced cachexia in mice. Anticancer Res. 1999, 19: 4099-4103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Blain JF, Paradis E, Gaudreault SB, Champagne D, Richard D, Poirier J: A role for lipoprotein lipase during synaptic remodeling in the adult mouse brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2004, 15: 510-519. 10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fonta C, Negyessy L, Renaud L, Barone P: Areal and subcellular localization of the ubiquitous alkaline phosphatase in the primate cerebral cortex: evidence for a role in neurotransmission. Cereb Cortex. 2004, 14: 595-609. 10.1093/cercor/bhh021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Pal RH, Klein W, van Golde LM, Lopes-Cardozo M: Developmental profiles of arylsulfatases A and B in rat cerebral cortex and spinal cord. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991, 1081: 315-320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gali P, Hauw JJ, Boutry JM, Hartmann L: Immunofluorescence and histochemical methods for neural M1 pyruvate kinase localization. J Neurochem. 1981, 37: 1377-1384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Juttler E, Tarabin V, Schwaninger M: Interleukin-6 (IL-6): a possible neuromodulator induced by neuronal activity. Neuroscientist 2002 Jun;8(3 ):268 -75. 2002, 8: 268-275. Jun;8(3 ):268 -75Google Scholar
  32. Patz S, Wirth MJ, Gorba T, Klostermann O, Wahle P: Neuronal activity and neurotrophic factors regulate GAD-65/67 mRNA and protein expression in organotypic cultures of rat visual cortex. Eur J Neurosci. 2003, 18: 1-12. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02702.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Iwashita T, Park IK, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ: Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 2003, 425: 962-967. 10.1038/nature02060.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Graus-Porta D, Blaess S, Senften M, Littlewood-Evans A, Damsky C, Huang Z, Orban P, Klein R, Schittny JC, Muller U: Beta1-class integrins regulate the development of laminae and folia in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Neuron. 2001, 31: 367-379. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00374-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kapur R, Cooper R, Zhang L, Williams DA: Cross-talk between alpha(4)beta(1)/alpha(5)beta(1) and c-Kit results in opposing effect on growth and survival of hematopoietic cells via the activation of focal adhesion kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and Akt signaling pathways. Blood. 2001, 97: 1975-1981. 10.1182/blood.V97.7.1975.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirchberg K, Lange TS, Klein EC, Jungtaubl H, Heinen G, Meyer-Ingold W, Scharffetter-Kochanek K: Induction of beta 1 integrin synthesis by recombinant platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-AB) correlates with an enhanced migratory response of human dermal fibroblasts to various extracellular matrix proteins. Exp Cell Res. 1995, 220: 29-35. 10.1006/excr.1995.1288.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ahlen K, Ring P, Tomasini-Johansson B, Holmqvist K, Magnusson KE, Rubin K: Platelet-derived growth factor-BB modulates membrane mobility of beta1 integrins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004 Jan 30 ;314 (1 ):89 -96. 2004, 314: 89-96. Jan 30 ;314 (1 ):89 -96Google Scholar
  38. Ward DM, Kaplan J: Mitogenic agents induce redistribution of transferrin receptors from internal pools to the cell surface. Biochem J. 1986, 238: 721-728.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Erlandsson A, Enarsson M, Forsberg-Nilsson K: Immature neurons from CNS stem cells proliferate in response to platelet-derived growth factor. J Neurosci. 2001, 21: 3483-3491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Racay P, Kaplan P, Lehotsky J: Control of Ca2+ homeostasis in neuronal cells. Gen Physiol Biophys. 1996, 15: 193-210.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chung YD, Zhu J, Han Y, Kernan MJ: nompA encodes a PNS-specific, ZP domain protein required to connect mechanosensory dendrites to sensory structures. Neuron. 2001, 29: 415-428. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00215-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Jovine L, Qi H, Williams Z, Litscher E, Wassarman PM: The ZP domain is a conserved module for polymerization of extracellular proteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 457-461. 10.1038/ncb802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakano K, Chen J, Tarr GE, Yoshida T, Flynn JM, Bitensky MW: Rethinking the role of phosducin: light-regulated binding of phosducin to 14-3-3 in rod inner segments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 4693-4698. 10.1073/pnas.071067198.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Reed JA, Finnerty B, Albino AP: Divergent cellular differentiation pathways during the invasive stage of cutaneous malignant melanoma progression. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 549-555.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Dhillon AP, Rode J: Patterns of staining for neurone specific enolase in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions of the skin. Diagn Histopathol. 1982, 5: 169-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Dhillon AP, Rode J: Immunohistochemical studies of S100 protein and other neural characteristics expressed by granular cell tumour. Diagn Histopathol. 1983, 6: 23-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Prieto VG, McNutt NS, Lugo J, Reed JA: Differential expression of the intermediate filament peripherin in cutaneous neural lesions and neurotized melanocytic nevi. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997, 21: 1450-1454. 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Sangueza OP, Requena L: Neoplasms with neural differentiation: a review. Part II: Malignant neoplasms. Am J Dermatopathol. 1998, 20: 89-102. 10.1097/00000372-199802000-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Molofsky AV, Pardal R, Iwashita T, Park IK, Clarke MF, Morrison SJ: Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 2003, 425: 962-967. 10.1038/nature02060.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Azizi E, Friedman J, Pavlotsky F, Iscovich J, Bornstein A, Shafir R, Trau H, Brenner H, Nass D: Familial cutaneous malignant melanoma and tumors of the nervous system. A hereditary cancer syndrome. Cancer. 1995, 76: 1571-1578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. McAllister RM, Nicolson M, Gardner MB, Rongey RW, Rasheed S, Sarma PS, Huebner RJ, Hatanaka M, Oroszlan S, Gilden RV, Kabigting A, Vernon L: C-type virus released from cultured human rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Nat New Biol. 1972, 235: 3-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Rasheed S, McAllister RM, Henderson BE, Gardner MB: Brief communication: In vitro host range and serologic studies on RD-114 virus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1973, 51: 1383-1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rasheed et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.