Open Access

Prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA somatic mutations in patients with colorectal carcinoma may vary in the same population: clues from Sardinia

  • Grazia Palomba1,
  • Maria Colombino1,
  • Antonio Contu2,
  • Bruno Massidda3,
  • Giovanni Baldino2,
  • Antonio Pazzola2,
  • MariaTeresa Ionta3,
  • Francesca Capelli4,
  • Vittorio Trova5,
  • Tito Sedda6,
  • Giovanni Sanna7,
  • Francesco Tanda8,
  • Mario Budroni9,
  • Sardinian Translational Oncology Group (STOG),
  • Giuseppe Palmieri1, 11Email author and
  • Antonio Cossu10
Journal of Translational Medicine201210:178

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-178

Received: 11 May 2012

Accepted: 23 August 2012

Published: 29 August 2012

Abstract

Background

Role of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been recently investigated worldwide. In this population-based study, we evaluated the incidence rates and distribution of such somatic mutations in genetically isolated population from Sardinia.

Methods

From April 2009 to July 2011, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues (N = 478) were prospectively collected from Sardinian CRC patients at clinics across the entire island. Genomic DNA was isolated from tissue sections and screened for mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA genes by automated DNA sequencing.

Results

Overall, KRAS tumour mutation rate was 30% (145/478 positive cases). Distribution of mutation carriers was surprisingly different within the island: 87/204 (43%) in North Sardinia vs. 58/274 (21%) in Middle-South Sardinia (p<0.001). Among 384 CRC cases whose DNA was available, only one (0.3%) patient carried a mutation in BRAF gene; PIK3CA was found mutated in 67 (17%) patients. A significant inverse distribution of PIK3CA mutation rates was observed within Sardinian population: 19/183 (10%) cases from northern vs. 48/201 (24%) cases from central-southern island (p<0.001). This heterogeneity in frequencies of KRAS/PIK3CA somatic mutations is consistent with already-reported discrepancies in distribution of germline mutations for other malignancies within Sardinian population. Preliminary clinical evaluation of 118 KRAS wild-type patients undergoing anti-EGFR-based treatment indicated lack of role for PIK3CA in predicting response to therapy.

Conclusions

Our findings support the hypothesis that differences in patients’ origins and related genetic backgrounds may contribute to even determine the incidence rate of somatic mutations in candidate cancer genes.

Keywords

Colorectal carcinoma KRAS gene BRAF gene PIK3CA gene Mutation analysis Cancer genetic heterogeneity

Introduction

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) develops through different pathways, all involving changes at the chromosomal or gene levels. It is now widely accepted that sporadic colorectal cancers frequently arise from preneoplastic lesions through the activation of oncogenes (KRAS and BRAF) as well as the inactivation of tumour suppressor genes (APC, p16, p53, and DCC) and mismatch repair genes, such as MLH1 and MSH2 and, to a lower extent, PMS2 and hMSH6[1]. In addition, activating mutations in BRAF, a member of the RAF gene family, which encode kinases that are regulated by members of the RAS protein family (HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS) and mediate cellular responses to growth signals, were found to be associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) cancers [2, 3]. As stated above, KRAS is the member of the RAS gene family mostly mutated in CRC; unlike the BRAF mutations, the KRAS mutations have been found to be equally distributed in all tumours, regardless of their MSI status [4]. These findings acquire an important role from the pathogenetic point of view since the mutations that hit these two genes are reciprocally exclusive. On such a basis, the occurrence of an activating mutation at either one of the two genes may be linked to different molecular processes and, therefore, may generate at least three distinct tumour subtype: BRAFmut/MSI+, KRASmut/MSI+, and KRASmut/MSI- [24].

Mutation of KRAS is an established predictor of absence of response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted agents [5]. The utility of KRAS as a prognostic marker remains uncertain. A recent meta-analysis reported that KRAS mutation may act as a negative prognostic indicator in both a trans-stage and stage-specific setting [6], whereas other studies, such as the large PETACC-3 translational trial [7], reported the absence of any prognostic value. On this regard, survival from recurrence was markedly worse in BRAF-mutant tumours into the PETACC-3 trial and this observation was consistent with the previously reported poor prognosis of BRAF mutations in advanced (stage IV) CRCs [8]. Unlike KRAS mutations, BRAF mutations might not be predictive of lack of anti-EGFR therapy benefit [3]. Among these genes, nearly all mutations affect the kinase domains at codons 12 or 13 of KRAS and codon 600 of BRAF[3, 9].

In addition to the RAS/RAF/MEK pathway, the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade does participate in regulating cell proliferation and survival, apoptosis, and migration [10]. Activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently mediated by mutations in the p110α subunit of PI3K, PIK3CA, with most mutations (>80%) occurring either in exon 9, which codes for the helical domain, or exon 20, which codes for the kinase domain [10].

In population-based studies, the prevalence of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations ranges from 30% to 40% for KRAS mutations, from 5% to 15% for BRAF mutations, and from 10% to 15% for PIK3CA mutations [11]. Somatic mutations of PIK3CA may coexist with either KRAS or BRAF mutations within the same tumor [12], but KRAS and BRAF mutations appear to be mutually exclusive [13].

In Sardinia, which has experienced little immigration due to its remote location and whose population has inherited many of the same genetic traits, the contribution of somatic mutations in these three genes to the CRC pathogenesis has not been estimated yet. Colorectal cancer represents the second principal death-causing malignancy in Sardinia, with an incidence (standardized rate, 104 per 100.000 inhabitants per year; Sardinian population includes about one million and half inhabitants) quite comparable with that observed in Western countries [14].

As previously demonstrated by our group for other malignancies (mainly, breast cancer and malignant melanoma), the geographical distribution of germline sequence variants across the island seems to be significantly heterogeneous, suggesting that the genetic background may influence the occurrence of cancer gene mutations [1517]. In this study, we assessed the prevalence and distribution of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations at somatic level among 478 consecutively-collected CRC patients from Sardinian population.

Materials and methods

Samples

Four hundred and seventy-eight patients with histologically-proven diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) and regularly participating to the follow-up programs at the Institutions across Sardinia island were included into the study. To avoid any bias, CRC patients were consecutively collected from April 2009 to September 2011; they were included regardless of age at diagnosis and disease characteristics. No CRC case from our series was associated with clinically relevant colorectal polyposis. Sardinian origin was ascertained in all cases through genealogical studies; for all patients, place of birth of their parents and grandparents was assessed in order to assign their geographical origin within the island. Clinical and pathological features for the assessment of the disease stage at diagnosis as well as of the onset age and tumour anatomical location were confirmed by medical records and/or pathology reports. Disease stage classification was assigned according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines [18].

Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples from CRC patients were obtained from the archives of the Institutes and Services of Pathology participating to the study. Tissue samples were estimated to contain at least 70% neoplastic cells by light microscopy.

All patients were informed about the aims of this study and, before the tissue sample was collected, gave a written informed consent. The study was reviewed and approved by the ethical review board of the University of Sassari.

Mutation analysis

All tumour tissues were collected and processed at the laboratory of the Institute of Biomolecular Chemistry of Sassari; genomic DNA was isolated from tissue sections using a standard protocol and DNA quality assessed for each specimen. In particular, paraffin was removed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples by treatment with Bio-Clear (Bio-optica, Milan, Italy) and DNA was purified using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA).

The coding sequence and splice junctions of exons 2 and 3 in KRAS gene (where all pathogenetic mutations occur [9]), exon 15 in BRAF gene (nearly all oncogenic mutations have been detected at the kinase domain in exon 15 [19, 20]), and exons 9 and 20 in PIK3CA gene (they represent the mostly mutated domains of this gene [10, 21]) were screened for mutations by direct automated sequencing. Briefly, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed on 25–50 ng of isolated genomic DNA in a 9700 Thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA); all PCR-amplified products were directly sequenced using an automated fluorescence-based cycle sequencer (ABIPRISM 3100, Applied Bio-systems, Foster City, CA), as previously described by our group [17]. Primer sequences were as follow: KRAS exon 2 forward, TGTGTGACATGTTCTAATATAGTCACAT - exon 2 reverse, GGTCCTGCACCAGTAATATGC - exon 3 forward, GACTGTGTTTCTCCCTTCT - exon 3 reverse, TGGCAAATACACAAAGAAAG; PIK3CA exon 9 forward, GGGAAAAA TATGACAAAGAAAGC - exon 9 reverse, CTGAGATCAGCCAAATTCAGTT - exon 20 forward, CTCAATGATGCTTGGCTCTG - exon 20 reverse, TGGAATCCAGAGTGAGC TTTC; BRAF exon 15 forward, TCATAATGCTTGCTCTGATAGGA - exon 15 reverse, GGCCAAAAATTTAATCAGTGGA. Protocols for PCR-based assays were designed and optimized in our laboratory; they will be available upon request. Screening for BRAF and PIK3CA genes was incomplete in a fifth of patients (94/478; 20%) due to the low amount of available tumour tissue samples.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis for the presence of KRAS, BRAF, or PIK3CA mutations versus different variables (sex, age at diagnosis, anatomical site of primary CRC, disease stage, geographical origin of patients) was performed by Pearson’s Chi-Square test. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) values were calculated by logistic regression analysis. The exact coefficient for sample proportion analysis was performed to determine all significant parameters (below 0.05 level). All analyses were performed using the statistical package SPSS/7.5 per Windows.

Results

Paraffin-embedded tumour tissues from a total of 478 patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) originating from different geographical areas within Sardinia island were screened for mutations in candidate genes. Considering the primary tumour, left colon was the most frequent anatomical location (left colon, 192 [40%]; right-transverse colon, 172 [36%]; rectum, 114 [24%]) (Table 1). The median age was 64 years (range, 31–87 years), with a preponderance of males (291 men; 61%). At the time of diagnosis, minority of patients presented with localized disease (AJCC stage II, 173 [36%] versus AJCC advanced stages III and IV, 160 [34%] and 145 [30%], respectively) (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of mutations according to the characteristics of CRC patients

Characteristic

 

KRASmut

 

PI3Kmut

 

No. (N = 478)

 

No. (N = 384)

 

Sex

Male

293

84 (29%)

231

38* (16%)

Female

185

61 (33%)

153

29 (19%)

Tumor site

Right-transverse colon

172

54 (31%)

138

25* (18%)

Left colon

192

59 (31%)

151

23 (15%)

Rectum

114

32 (28%)

95

19 (20%)

Disease stage

Stage II

173

44 (25%)

143

22 (15%)

Stage III

160

56 (35%)

128

25 (20%)

Stage IV

145

45 (31%)

113

20* (18%)

Tumor grading

Well differentiated

56

17 (30%)

44

6 (14%)

Moderately differentiated

383

118 (31%)

309

54 (17%)

Poorly differentiated

39

10 (26%)

31

7* (23%)

Age, years

< 50

50

16 (32%)

45

5 (11%)

50-59

116

38 (33%)

102

14 (14%)

60-69

178

56 (31%)

151

30* (20%)

70+

134

35 (26%)

86

18 (21%)

* 1 patient also mutated in BRAF.

The full coding sequences and intron-exon junctions of the KRAS gene were sequenced in the entire series of 478 CRC patients; KRAS mutations were detected in 145 (30%) primary tumours (one patient had two mutations, G12D and Q61L). In terms of the gene positions of the identified KRAS mutations, 73% (N = 106) of them affected codon 12 and 20% (N = 29) affected codon 13, whereas the remaining 7% (N = 11) affected other codons (mainly, codon 61) (Table 2). All KRAS mutations detected in the present study have been previously reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) [22] and in the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC) [23]. Considering the patients’ origin within the Sardinia island, distribution of mutations was significantly heterogeneous: 87/204 (43%) mutated cases in North Sardinia versus 58/274 (21%) in Middle-South Sardinia [p<0.001 (OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.75-2.89); p normalized scientific notation = 6.8 x 10-4 (Figure 1). Such discrepancies did not result from incorrect standard sequencing as confirmed by an independent duplicate analysis.
Table 2

Somatic mutations in KRAS gene

Mutation

No.

%

Codon 12

G12A

13

9

G12C

11

8

G12D*

41

28

G12R

4

3

G12S

5

3

G12V

32

22

Total

106

73

Codon 13

E49K

1

0.5

Codon 49

G13C

4

3

G13D

23

16

G13S/V

2

1

Total

29

20

Codon 59

Q61R

2

1

Q61L*

7

5

Total

9

6

Codon 61

A59E

1

0.5

Percentages are referred to mutation frequencies among the 145 positive cases.

* 1 patient with two mutations.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-10-178/MediaObjects/12967_2012_Article_1212_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Frequencies of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations across Sardinia. The three geographical regions within the island are indicated.

Among available DNA samples, 384 primary tumours were also evaluated for occurrence of BRAF (in exon 15) and PIK3CA (in exons 9 and 20) mutations. Overall, mutations were detected in 1 (0.3%) patient for BRAF gene and 67 (17.4%) cases for PIK3CA gene.

The single BRAF-mutated patient presented: a) the substitution of valine by a glutamic acid at position 600 (V600E), which has been demonstrated to account for majority (about 90%) of the BRAF mutations identified [19, 20, 24]; and b) a concomitant PIK3CA mutation, whereas no KRAS mutation coexisted. For PIK3CA mutations, screening revealed the occurrence of six mutations (p.E542K, p.E545A, p.E545G, and p.E545K in exon 9; p.M1043I and p.H1047R in exon 20), which have been widely reported in mutation databases (HGMD and COSMIC; see above) as commonly associated with CRC, with a recognized functional role of the corresponding mutated proteins. The variant p.E545A was the mutation with the highest frequency in our series (detected in 54/384 [14%] cases) (Table 3). Mutations of PIK3CA and KRAS were found to coexist in 15/384 (3.9%) of cases.
Table 3

Prevalence of somatic mutations in PIK3CA gene

Exon

Mutated cases(%)*

Protein

DNA

9

1 (1.5%)

E542K

c.1624 G > A

 

54 (80.6%)

E545A

c.1634A > C

 

4 (6.0%)

E545G

c.1634A > G

 

1 (1.5%)

E545K

c.1633 G > A

20

1 (1.5%)

M1043I

c.3129 G > T

 

6 (8.9%)

H1047R

c.3140A > G

*percentages are referred to the series of 67 positive cases.

Table 4 summarizes the distribution and relationship of the somatic mutations identified in the series of 384 CRC tumours for all three candidate genes. Altogether, a mutation of at least one gene was discovered in about half (174/384; 45.3%) of CRC cases; in other words, 54.7% (N = 210) primary tumours displayed a wild-type genetic status in these three genes (Table 4).
Table 4

Frequencies of somatic mutations in the series of 384 patients screened for all three genes, according to the geographical origin

Patients’ origin

KRAS

  

PIK3CA

wild-type

  

KRAS + PIK3CA

BRAF + PIK3CA

  
 

%

%

%

%

%

North Sardinia (N = 183)

66

8

0

11

98

36.1

4.4

0

6.0

53.5

Middle-South Sardinia (N = 201)

41

7

1

40

112

20.4

3.5

0.5

19.9

55.7

Total (N = 384)

107

15

1

51

210

 

27.8

3.9

0.3

13.3

54.7

Considering the patients’ origin, PIK3CA mutations were found to be inversely distributed as compared to the KRAS mutations: 19 (10%) out of 183 patients from North Sardinia versus 48 (24%) out of 201 patients from Middle-South Sardinia were found to carry mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene (Table 4; Figure 1). As for KRAS, such a heterogeneous distribution of PIK3CA mutations was found highly significant [p<0.001 (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 2.36-2.55); p normalized scientific notation = 5.9 x 10-4]. To avoid any putative artefact, such discrepancies were again confirmed in independent duplicate sequencing experiments. As shown in Figure 2, majority (63%) of KRAS mutations were found in patients from North Sardinia whereas more than two thirds (70%) of PIK3CA mutations were detected in patients from Middle-South Sardinia. No difference in distribution of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations between rural and urban areas, both globally and within the two (North vs. Middle-South) geographical regions was observed.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-10-178/MediaObjects/12967_2012_Article_1212_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Geographical distribution of mutation carriers in the series of 384 patients screened for all three genes. (A) Entire island. (B) Northern and (C) Central-Southern regions. Prevalence of (D) KRAS- and (E) PIK3CA-mutated patients according to the geographical origin.

Both KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated for association with several pathological parameters: sex, age at diagnosis, anatomical location of primary CRC, tumour grading, AJCC stage of the disease. In our series, no significant correlation was found between the occurrence of KRAS or PIK3CA mutations and all analyzed parameters. However, a non-significant trend for PIK3CA mutations to be associated with a older age of onset and a higher tumour grade was observed (see Table 1). Absence of any association between the different variables was also confirmed by a multivariate analysis.

Finally, we preliminarily evaluated the association between PIK3CA mutations and response to the treatment with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in patients with wild-type KRAS. Among the 118 KRAS mutation negative patients for whom results were available (105 [89%] treated with cetuximab in association with systemic chemotherapy and 13 [11%] with panitumumab alone), the objective response rate at first evaluation was 30% (N = 35; no complete clinical response was registered) (Table 5). In this subset of patients, a slight but not significant difference in rates of partial responses was observed between PIK3CA-mutated (7/29; 24%) and PIK3CA-wild-type (28/89; 31%) cases (Table 5).
Table 5

Clinical response to anti-EGFR therapy in KRAS wild-type patients

  

KRASwt

 

KRASwt (N = 118)

PI3Kwt (N = 89)

PI3Kmut (N = 29)

PR

35 (30%)

28 (31%)

7 (24%)

SD

58 (49%)

45 (51%)

13 (45%)

PD

25 (21%)

16 (18%)

9 (31%)

PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progression disease. wt, wild-type.

Discussion

In this study, we have reported the prevalence of somatic mutations in KRAS PIK3CA, and BRAF genes among patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma from Sardinia, whose population shows genetic peculiarity due to geographical isolation and strong genetic drift [25]. Prevalence of candidate gene mutations may vary among distinct populations due to concurrence of different environmental factors and genetic backgrounds. Furthermore, patients’ geographical origin within the same population may also account for different mutation rates in pathogenetic cancer genes, as already demonstrated for different types of cancer in Sardinian population by our group [1517]. In summary, we observed a moderate rate of KRAS mutations (145/478; 30.3%) or PIK3CA mutations (67/384; 17.4%) and a very low rate of BRAF mutations (1/384; 0.3%) in a cohort of primary colorectal carcinomas.

Prevalence of KRAS mutations in our series is consistent with data from literature, indicating that such an alteration can be found in 30-40% of colorectal carcinomas [6]. Controversial data have been instead published about the PIK3CA mutation rates, ranging from 7% [26] to 30% [27] of CRC cases presenting a mutated PIK3CA. In the present study, all detected PIK3CA variants have been previously demonstrated to be oncogenic in CRC cellular models [28] and commonly associated with colorectal carcinoma (17%; see Table 3); the mutation rate was therefore comparable with that described in majority of previous reports.

The most surprising finding was the nearly lack of BRAF mutations in our series. In recent meta-analyses, the BRAF V600E mutation - which represents the most common mutation in BRAF gene (more than 90% of cases) - was detected in about 9% of primary colorectal carcinomas [29, 30]. One could speculate that the very low frequency of BRAF mutation detected in our series may be somehow due to patients’ origin or, in other words, to the peculiarity of the genetically-isolated Sardinian population. On this regard, it cannot be excluded that different pathogenetic mechanisms of transformation could occur in different populations. Microsatellite instability (MSI), a recognized marker of a tendency for replication errors in human cancers, has been widely indicated as a factor associated with higher frequency of mutations in BRAF gene among colorectal carcinomas [29, 31, 32]. Although such an analysis was not conducted in the present study, Sardinian CRC population has been previously demonstrated to present an incidence of MSI similar to that observed in other CRC populations from Western countries [33, 34]. Therefore, this factor could not explain the striking discrepancy on the BRAF mutation prevalence in our series.

Considering the two prevalent alterations, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were more or less equally distributed among the different patients’ subsets, and no statistically significant correlation with sex, onset age (though patients with older age at diagnosis and a higher tumour grade are more likely to present with a PIK3CA mutation), disease stage, primary CRC location, or tumour grading was observed (see Table 1).

As schematically represented in Figure 2, we made comparisons between prevalence of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations within different geographical areas of the island. In a population sharing a quite similar lifestyle and diet habit across the island (moreover, smokers were homogeneously distributed among patients of different origin - though such an information from medical records was available in only about 70% of cases from our series), the observation that a higher frequency of KRAS mutations was found in CRC cases from North Sardinia (43% vs. 21%) whereas a higher prevalence of PIK3CA mutations was found in patients from South Sardinia (24% vs. 10%) strongly suggest that different “genetic background” may also induce discrepant penetrance and distribution of somatic mutations in candidate cancer genes. As for similar data reported by our group in breast cancer and melanoma, the geographical distribution of the genetic variants in the island seems to be related to the specific large areas of Sardinia, which reflect its ancient history: the North area, delimited by the mountain chain crossing Sardinia and linguistically different from the rest of the island; and the Middle-South area, land of the ancient Sardinian population and domain of pastoral culture. Nevertheless, our findings clearly indicate that mutation frequency for any candidate cancer gene needs to be accurately evaluated in each geographical area within every single population. Due to this unexpected heterogeneity in distribution of somatic mutations in such few main genes, we already started the collection of tumour DNA samples from Sardinian colorectal cancer patients in order to perform a whole-exome sequencing and define a more comprehensive pattern of mutations in this population.

Finally, although performed on a limited number of CRC cases, our preliminary data seemed to indicate no correlation between PIK3CA mutations and response to the anti-EGFR treatment in patients with wild-type KRAS (objective responses were considered at first evaluation only) (see Table 5). A second study focused on evaluating such clinical aspects in a larger subset of patients is ongoing.

KRAS mutations are considered as an early event in the sequential accumulation of molecular alterations underlying the progression from colorectal adenoma to malignant carcinoma, resulting in an important tumour growth advantage. During the recent past years, a targeted therapy with monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab and panitumumab), blocking the EGFR-driven cell proliferation signals, has been introduced into the therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer [9, 35]. No significant response to therapy with anti-EGFR antibodies have been observed in colorectal cancer patients exhibiting KRAS mutations [36]. Moreover, majority of colorectal carcinomas exhibiting wild-type KRAS do not respond to such therapies either [9]. These phenomena are expected from the molecular point of view, since EGFR tyrosine kinase transmits proliferation signals via RAS-GTPase on the cell membrane inner surface, which in turn can bind effector proteins such as RAF or PIK3CA kinases [37]. Therefore, the occurrence of functional integrity of the RAS-driven pathways - BRAF-MEK-ERK and PIK3CA-AKT - is necessary in order to really interfere with tumour cell growth through inhibition of EGFR target. In other words, the assessment of mutational status of BRAF and PIK3CA genes into the KRAS wild-type population may indeed improve the selection of patients presenting such a functional integrity of the RAS-driven pathways (though we are aware that additional alterations in downstream effectors may intervene). In contrast to KRAS, the heterogeneity of BRAF and PIK3CA mutations has not been adequately investigated in colorectal cancer thus far.

In the present study, because some somatic mutations (in BRAF and PIK3CA genes or in KRAS and PIK3CA genes) occurred concomitantly in a given patient, which is in line with literature, a total of about 45% of all patients showed at least one mutation in any of these three genes (see Table 4). Therefore, our data suggest that including mutation analyses for BRAF and PIK3CA in addition to KRAS into a standard diagnostic setting of colorectal cancer would allow the identification of an additional fraction (in our case, about 15%) of patients who cannot be considered as “true wild-type” for such main proliferation-controlling genes. However, whether or not these additional patients might benefit from EGFR-specific antibody therapy has to be verified in prospective clinical studies.

Conclusions

Although Sardinian population is considered genetically homogeneous, the results obtained in the present study may represent a clear indication that: a) differences into the genetic background - related to distinct patients’ origin within the island - may account for different mutation rates in candidate cancer genes (in our series, KRAS and PIK3CA), even at somatic level; and b) mutation frequency for any candidate cancer gene needs to be accurately evaluated in each geographical area.

Abbreviations

COSMIC: 

Catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer

CRC: 

Colorectal carcinoma

EGFR: 

Epidermal growth factor receptor

FFPE: 

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

HGMD: 

Human gene mutation database

MSI: 

Microsatellite instability

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Other investigators of the Sardinian Translational Oncology Group involved in this study and considered as co-authors: Marta Contu, Angelo Cuccu, Antonio Farris, Antonio Macciò, Giuseppe Mameli, Nina Olmeo, Salvatore Ortu, Elisabetta Petretto, Valeria Pusceddu, Luciano Virdis.

Authors are grateful to patients for their important contribution to this study. Work was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health “Progetto Ricerca Finalizzata” and Sardinian Regional Government (Regione Autonoma della Sardegna).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare, CNR
(2)
Servizio Oncologia, ASL1
(3)
Oncologia Medica, Università di Cagliari
(4)
Oncologia, ASL
(5)
Oncologia, ASL
(6)
Oncologia, ASL
(7)
Oncologia Medica, AOU
(8)
Anatomia Patologica, Università di Sassari
(9)
Servizio Epidemiologia, ASL1
(10)
Anatomia Patologica, AOU
(11)
Unit of Cancer Genetics, Institute Biomolecular Chemistry (ICB), National Research Council (CNR)

References

  1. Tanaka H, Deng G, Matsuzaki K, Kakar S, Kim GE, Miura S, Sleisenger MH, Kim YS: BRAF mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability occur more frequently and concordantly in mucinous than non-mucinous colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006, 118: 2765-2771. 10.1002/ijc.21701.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Rajagopalan H, Bardelli A, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE: Tumorigenesis: RAF/RAS oncogenes and mismatch-repair status. Nature. 2002, 418: 934-10.1038/418934a.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Tol J, Nategaal ID, Punt CJA: BRAF mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361: 98-99. 10.1056/NEJMc0904160.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Peltomäki P: Mutations and epimutations in the origin of cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2012, 318: 299-310. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.12.001.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Heinemann V, Stintzing S, Kirchner T: Clinical relevance of EGFR- and KRAS-status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009, 35: 262-271. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2008.11.005.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Qiu LX, Mao C, Zhang J, Zhu XD, Liao RY, Xue K, Li J, Chen Q: Predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab: a meta-analysis of 22 studies. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46: 2781-2787. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.05.022.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Roth AD, Tejpar S, Delorenzi M, Yan P, Fiocca R, Klingbiel D, Dietrich D, Biesmans B, Bodoky G, Barone C, Aranda E, Nordlinger B, Cisar L, Labianca R, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, Bosman F: Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60–00 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 466-474. 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.3452.View ArticlePubMed
  8. Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, Albertsen H, Levin TR, Murtaugh MA, Wolff RK, Slattery ML: Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 6063-6069. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0404.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Bardelli A, Siena S: Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 1254-1261. 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6116.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Engelman JA: Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 550-562. 10.1038/nrc2664.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Baldus SE, Schaefer KL, Engers R, Hartleb D, Stoecklein NH, Gabbert HE: Prevalence and heterogeneity of KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas and their corresponding metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2010, 16: 790-799. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2446.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Janku F, Lee JJ, Tsimberidou AM, Hong DS, Naing A, Falchook GS, Fu S, Luthra R, Garrido-Laguna I, Kurzrock R: PIK3CA mutations frequently coexist with RAS and BRAF mutations in patients with advanced cancers. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e22769-10.1371/journal.pone.0022769.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  13. Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Zanon C, Moroni M, Veronese S, Siena S, Bardelli A: Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 2643-2648. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4158.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Budroni M, Cesaraccio R, Pirino D, Sechi O, Oggiano M, Piras D, Sechi A, Cossu A, Palmieri G, Tanda F: Cancer incidence in Sassari Province (1998–2002). Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol. IX, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Scientific Publications, No. 160. Edited by: Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, Boyle P. 2007, Lyon, IARC
  15. Palomba G, Pisano M, Cossu A, Budroni M, Dedola MF, Farris A, Contu A, Baldinu P, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Spectrum and prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in Sardinian breast cancer patients through a hospital-based screening. Cancer. 2005, 104: 1172-1179. 10.1002/cncr.21298.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Palomba G, Loi A, Uras A, Fancello P, Piras G, Gabbas A, Cossu A, Budroni M, Contu A, Tanda F, Farris A, Orrù S, Floris C, Pisano M, Lovicu M, Santona MC, Landriscina G, Crisponi L, Palmieri G, Monne M: A role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility within Sardinian population. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 245-10.1186/1471-2407-9-245.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  17. Casula C, Muggiano A, Cossu A, Budroni M, Caracò C, Ascierto PA, Pagani E, Stanganelli I, Canzanella S, Sini MC, Palomba G, Palmieri G, The Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI): Role of key-regulator genes in melanoma susceptibility and pathogenesis among patients from South Italy. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 352-10.1186/1471-2407-9-352.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  18. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. Edited by: Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID. 2002, Springer, Philadelphia, 6
  19. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, Teague J, Woffendin H, Garnett MJ, Bottomley W, Davis N, Dicks E, Ewing R, Floyd Y, Gray K, Hall S, Hawes R, Hughes J, Kosmidou V, Menzies A, Mould C, Parker A, Stevens C, Watt S, Hooper S, Wilson R, Jayatilake H, Gusterson BA, Cooper C, Shipley J: Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature. 2002, 417: 949-954. 10.1038/nature00766.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Casula M, Colombino M, Satta MP, Cossu A, Ascierto PA, Bianchi-Scarrà G, Castiglia D, Budroni M, Rozzo C, Manca A, Lissia A, Carboni A, Petretto E, Satriano SMR, Botti G, Mantelli M, Ghiorzo P, Stratton MR, Tanda F, Palmieri G: BRAF gene is somatically mutated but does not make a major contribution to malignant melanoma susceptibility. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 286-292.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Nosho K, Kawasaki T, Ohnishi M, Suemoto Y, Kirkner GJ, Zepf D, Yan L, Longtine JA, Fuchs CS, Ogino S: PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: relationship with genetic and epigenetic alterations. Neoplasia. 2008, 10: 534-541.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  22. Institute of Medical Genetics in Cardiff: The Human Gene Mutation Database.http://archive.uwcm.ac.uk,
  23. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute: Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC).http://www.sanger.ac.uk/genetics/CGP/cosmic/,
  24. Sharma SG, Gulley ML: BRAF mutation testing in colorectal cancer. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010, 134: 1225-1228.PubMed
  25. Caramelli D, Vernesi C, Sanna S, Sampietro L, Lari M, Castrì L, Vona G, Floris R, Francalacci P, Tykot R, Casoli A, Bertranpetit J, Lalueza-Fox C, Bertorelle G, Barbujani G: Magnitude and distribution of linkage disequilibrium in population isolates and implications for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 556-560. 10.1038/ng1770.View Article
  26. Naguib A, Cooke JC, Happerfield L, Kerr L, Gay LJ, Luben RN, Ball RY, Mitrou PN, McTaggart A, Arends MJ: Alterations in PTEN and PIK3CA in colorectal cancers in the EPIC Norfolk study: associations with clinicopathological and dietary factors. BMC Cancer. 2011, 11: 123-10.1186/1471-2407-11-123.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  27. Mao C, Yang ZY, Hu XF, Chen Q, Tang JL: PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2012, 23: 1518-1525. 10.1093/annonc/mdr464.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Samuels Y, Diaz LA, Schmidt-Kittler O, Cummins JM, Delong L, Cheong I, Rago C, Huso DL, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE: Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2005, 7: 561-573. 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.05.014.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Mao C, Liao RY, Qiu LX, Wang XW, Ding H, Chen Q: BRAF V600E mutation and resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2011, 38: 2219-2223. 10.1007/s11033-010-0351-4.View ArticlePubMed
  30. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, De Schutter J, Biesmans B, Fountzilas G, Kalogeras KT, Kotoula V, Papamichael D, Laurent-Puig P, Penault-Llorca F, Rougier P, Vincenzi B, Santini D, Tonini G, Cappuzzo F, Frattini M, Molinari F, Saletti P, De Dosso S, Martini M, Bardelli A, Siena S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tabernero J, Macarulla T, Di Fiore F, Gangloff AO, Ciardiello F, Pfeiffer P: Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11: 753-762. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Lubomierski N, Plotz G, Wormek M, Engels K, Kriener S, Trojan J, Jungling B, Zeuzem S, Raedle J: BRAF mutations in colorectal carcinoma suggest two entities of microsatellite-unstable tumors. Cancer. 2005, 104: 952-961. 10.1002/cncr.21266.View ArticlePubMed
  32. Kumar K, Brim H, Giardiello F, Smoot DT, Nouraie M, Lee EL, Ashktorab H: Distinct BRAF (V600E) and KRAS mutations in high microsatellite instability sporadic colorectal cancer in African Americans. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 1155-1161. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  33. Colombino M, Cossu A, Manca A, Dedola MF, Giordano M, Scintu F, Curci A, Avallone A, Comella G, Amoruso M, Margari A, Bonomo GM, Castriota M, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Prevalence and prognostic role of microsatellite instability in patients with rectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2002, 13: 1447-1453. 10.1093/annonc/mdf240.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Colombino M, Cossu A, Arba A, Manca A, Curci A, Avallone A, Comella G, Botti G, Scintu F, Amoruso M, D’Abbicco D, d’Agnessa MR, Spanu A, Tanda F, Palmieri G: Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among Southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases. Ann Oncol. 2003, 14: 1530-1536. 10.1093/annonc/mdg402.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Rodríguez J, Viúdez A, Ponz-Sarvisé M, Gil-Aldea I, Chopitea A, García-Foncillas J, Gil-Bazo I: Improving disease control in advanced colorectal cancer: Panitumumab and cetuximab. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010, 74: 193-202. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.07.005.View ArticlePubMed
  36. Linardou H, Dahabreh IJ, Kanaloupiti D, Siannis F, Bafaloukos D, Kosmidis P, Papadimitriou CA, Murray S: Assessment of somatic k-RAS mutations as a mechanism associated with resistance to EGFR-targeted agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9: 962-972. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70206-7.View ArticlePubMed
  37. Giehl K: Oncogenic Ras in tumor progression and metastasis. Biol Chem. 2005, 386: 193-205.PubMed

Copyright

© Palomba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.