Skip to main content

Table 3 FID scores for cGAN and baseline models. All models were evaluated using 10-fold cross validation. FID scores were calculated against the matching real patient MRI. Bolded fold represents the fold that yielded the best FID score for all three models (fold 3)

From: Conditional generative adversarial network driven radiomic prediction of mutation status based on magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer

 

cGAN

Pretrained autoencoder

Autoencoder

CV Fold 0

1.51 ± 0.67

3.41 ± 0.82

4.89 ± 0.52

CV Fold 1

1.91 ± 0.57

3.52 ± 0.75

3.90 ± 0.85

CV Fold 2

1.79 ± 0.64

3.32 ± 0.94

3.51 ± 0.92

CV Fold 3

1.31 ± 0.57

3.80 ± 0.73

3.76 ± 0.75

CV Fold 4

3.42 ± 0.72

4.69 ± 0.82

5.21 ± 0.94

CV Fold 5

3.14 ± 0.49

4.57 ± 0.53

5.16 ± 0.53

CV Fold 6

2.97 ± 0.38

4.08 ± 0.63

4.98 ± 0.41

CV Fold 7

3.45 ± 0.59

4.59 ± 0.94

4.94 ± 0.36

CV Fold 8

3.24 ± 0.94

4.21 ± 0.82

4.60 ± 0.48

CV Fold 9

2.76 ± 0.76

3.87 ± 0.91

4.05 ± 0.83

All folds

2.13 ± 0.33

3.79 ± 0.48

4.31 ± 0.53