Skip to main content

Table 3 Intra-network clusters showing significant changes and notable trends

From: Improved cognition after rifaximin treatment is associated with changes in intra- and inter-brain network functional connectivity

Observed effect

Affected network

Cluster name

N voxels

p value

MNI

(X, Y, Z)

Location

General effect of rifaximin

 Increase of signal after treatment

Medial sensorimotor network

MSMN-1

5

0.01

− 8, 18, 2

Left Caudate

 Decrease of signal after treatment

Right fronto-parietal network

RFPN-1

1

0.096

− 30, − 62, 30

Left intraparietal 0 area (IP0)

Left fronto-parietal network

LFPN-1

11

0.02

− 20, − 40, 58

Left Brodmann area 2

LFPN-2

4

0.034

4,− 52,− 12

Right cerebellar lobule I-IV

LFPN-3

2

0.051

− 28,− 52,62

Left area 7 anterior lateral (7AL)

LFPN-4

1

0.094

26,− 2,30

Right superior corona radiata

Lateral sensorimotor network

LSMN-1

1

0.021

12,− 30,54

Right corticospinal tract

Effect of treatment exclusively on responding patients

 Decrease of signal after treatment

Lateral sensorimotor network

LSMN-2

2

0.01

2,− 4,46

Right area 24 prime posterior (p24pr)

Left fronto-parietal network

LFPN-5

1

0.074

18,10,16

Right caudate

LFPN-6

1

0.099

26,− 2,28

Right superior corona radiata

Interaction between treatment and response group

 Relative increase of signal in Responder patients

and

Relative decrease of signal in Non-responder patients

Thalamic network

THN-1

10

0.021

− 41,57,4

Left area 9–46 anterior ventral (a9-46v)

THN-2

2

0.086

− 3,− 33,12

Left Corpus callosum splenium

Lateral visual network

LVN-1

1

0.089

− 26,− 38,52

Left Brodmann area 2

Pre-existing differences between response groups

 Increased signal in patients who will Respond

Basal ganglia network

BGN-1

39

0.014

2,− 54,28

Right area 7 medial (7 M)

BGN-2

4

0.06

18,− 52,32

Right posterior corona radiata

  1. The program FSL Randomise was used to analyse all intra-network differences
  2. FSL Randomise uses Generalized Linear Models (GLM) to analyse differences between groups
  3. All results were cluster-corrected for multiple comparisons using family-wise error (FWE), in combination with a threshold of p < 0.001 at the uncorrected voxel level
  4. Clusters were considered significant at p < 0.05 after FWE correction
  5. MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; MSMN, medial sensorimotor network; RFPN, right fronto-parietal network; LFPN, left fronto-parietal network; LSMN, lateral sensorimotor network; THN, Thalamic network; LVN, lateral visual network; BGN, basal ganglia network
  6. Significant p values are in bold