From: Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow
Phase | Participants | Design | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Phase1 | 72 healthy men and PM women | Safety and efficacy | Maximum BMD increase LS 5.3%; TH 2.8%; tolerant |
Phase2 | 419 PM women with low BMD | 70, 140, or 210 mg s.c. monthly or 140 or 210 mg s.c. Q3M (12 months) | LS11.3%; TH 4.1%; FN (3.7%); Maximum BMD increase in the 210 mg s.c monthly |
 | 48 participants with low bone mass | Dose and administration intervals study | Maximum BMD increase LS 7%; TH 3%; |
 | 252 participants with OP | Dose and administration intervals study | LS 11.3%; TH 4.7%; FN 3.8%; Maximum BMD increase in the 210 mg s.c monthly |
Phase3 | 7180 PM patients with OP (FRAME) | Fracture risk and efficacy | The new fracture risk and clinical fracture risk are lower |
 | 436 patients with OP (STRUCTURE) | Efficacy compared with teriparatide after bisphosphonates treatment | Higher BMD (TH 3.2%; FN 3.4%; LS 4.4%) |
 | 4093 women with OP (ARCH) | Fracture risk compared with alendronate | BMD increased at LS, TH, and FN at every timepoints; The new fracture risk and clinical fracture risk are lower |
 | 245 men with OP (BRIDGE) | Efficacy in male patients | Higher BMD (LS 12.1%; TH 2.5%; FN 2.2%) |
 | 76 PM women with OP | Efficacy | Higher BMD (LS 9.5%; TH 2.9%; FN 3.0%) |