From: Clinical application of calcium silicate-based bioceramics in endodontics
Application | Material | Main findings | References |
---|---|---|---|
Root perforation repair | MTA | MTA could repair the perforation and control the inflammation of periodontal tissue. | |
 |  | MTA possessed long-term stable sealant, biocompatibility and ability of the release of high concentration of calcium. | |
 |  | MTA displayed satisfactory long-term efficacy. | |
 |  | There was no significant difference between Pro-MTA and Angelus MTA in furcal perforation repair, but white MTA displayed better esthetic effect than grey MTA. | [74] |
 |  | ProRoot MTA and RetroMTA still existed more excellent adhesion ability than Biodentine and Supra MTA in blood contamination setting. | [75] |
 | Biodentine | Biodentine demonstrates superior bond strength when compared to MTA, but it is more susceptible to the influence of blood contamination. | |
 | Bioaggregate | Bioaggregate and grey MTA displayed similar satisfactory clinical efficacy. | [77] |
 | iRoot BP Plus | iRoot BP Plus displayed lower microleakage and tighter material-periodontal ligament tissue junctions than MTA. | [65] |