Skip to main content

Table 2 Type 3 p-values of explanatory variables in linear mixed models for each type of hassles and uplifts

From: Uplifts and hassles are related to worsening in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study

Variable

Num DF

Den DF

F value

P-valuea, b

Covariance STRUCTURE

Uplifts social intensity

 Week

1

2791

0.00

0.9503

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

0.75

0.4766

 Week * outcome group

2

2791

2.24

0.1063

Uplifts non-social intensity

 Week

1

2852

0.38

0.5371

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

2.25

0.1098

 Week * outcome group

2

2852

0.73

0.4808

Uplifts social frequency

 Week

1

2881

17.44

 < 0.0001

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

0.10

0.9055

 Week * outcome group

2

2881

0.05

0.9548

Uplifts non-social frequency

 Week

1

2881

4.02

0.0450

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

1.84

0.1628

 Week * outcome group

2

2881

1.34

0.2613

Hassles social intensity

 Week

1

2607

1.61

0.2052

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

0.46

0.6296

 Week * outcome group

2

2607

1.32

0.2662

Hassles non-social intensity

 Week

1

2856

0.02

0.8931

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

0.31

0.7346

 Week * outcome group

2

2856

4.13

0.0162

Hassles social frequency

 Week

1

2881

2.49

0.1145

TOEP

 Outcome group

2

125

0.51

0.5996

 Week * outcome group

2

2881

0.34

0.7098

Hassles non-social frequency

 Week

1

125

0.02

0.8968

UN

 Outcome group

2

125

1.16

0.3165

 Week * outcome group

2

125

1.25

0.2910

  1. TOEP Toeplitz; UN Unstructured
  2. ap-values were based on F-test from linear mixed models
  3. bbolded p-values are statistically significant at p < .05