Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation of heterogeneity and directional pleiotropy using different methods

From: Identification of host gene-microbiome associations in colorectal cancer patients using mendelian randomization

Data source

Classification

Bacterial taxas

Heterogeneity

Horizontal pleiotropy

I2 (%)

Cochran’s Q

P-value

Egger intercept

SE

P-value

MR-PRESSO global test p

MiBioGen consortium

Family

Porphyromonadaceae.id.943

8

10.89

0.37

0.00

0.02

0.94

0.5

MiBioGen consortium

Genus

Anaerotruncus.id.2054

0

5.33

0.80

0.01

0.02

0.76

0.797

MiBioGen consortium

Genus

Intestinibacter.id.11345

0

5.17

0.82

0.02

0.03

0.59

0.844

MiBioGen consortium

Genus

RuminococcaceaeUCG004.id.11362

0

5.31

0.72

− 0.04

0.05

0.44

0.779

MiBioGen consortium

Genus

Slackia.id.825

39

13.13

0.11

0.07

0.05

0.20

0.134

MiBioGen consortium

Species

Eubacteriumcoprostanoligenesgroup.id.11375

0

10.88

0.54

0.03

0.03

0.47

0.571

FinnGen

Family

Porphyromonadaceae.id.943

0

6.64

0.76

0.00

0.03

0.99

0.80

FinnGen

Genus

Anaerotruncus.id.2054

45

16.28

0.06

− 0.03

0.05

0.60

0.07

FinnGen

Genus

Intestinibacter.id.11345

2

9.22

0.42

− 0.04

0.05

0.46

0.45

FinnGen

Genus

RuminococcaceaeUCG004.id.11362

8

8.73

0.37

0.01

0.06

0.89

0.40

FinnGen

Genus

Slackia.id.825

0

3.41

0.91

0.07

0.06

0.28

0.92

FinnGen

Species

Eubacteriumcoprostanoligenesgroup.id.11375

0

5.51

0.90

− 0.01

0.04

0.91

0.90