Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparative mutational analysis as determined by Agena MassArray of mutations in EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, ERBB4, PIK3CA, KRAS and BRAF; IC50 values for copanlisib, refametinib, lapatinib, and the effect of trastuzumab on growth inhibition in a panel of gastric cancer cell lines

From: Targeting the PI3K and MAPK pathways to improve response to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-positive gastric cancer

Cell line

HER2 status

Mutational Status

Response to targeted therapies

EGFR

ERBB2

ERBB3

ERBB4

PIK3CA

KRAS

BRAF

Copanlisib (nM)

Refametinib (µM)

Lapatinib (nM)

Trastuzumab % growth inhibition at 10 µg/ml

ESO26

Strongly positive

WT

WT

WT

M772L

Q546H

WT

WT

43.1 ± 9.6

 > 10

290.8 ± 42.7

7.5 ± 5.7

NCI-N87

Strongly positive

WT

F425L

L436V

WT

WT

WT

WT

WT

26.8 ± 9.7

 > 10

39.8 ± 13.3

38.6 ± 2.1

OE19

Strongly positive

WT

WT

WT

WT

WT

WT

WT

 > 1000

2.75 ± 0.37

1660 ± 151.7

− 1.8 ± 7.6

SNU16

Weakly positive

WT

WT

WT

WT

WT

G12D

WT

102.6 ± 28.5

5.6 ± 1.4

 > 10,000

12 ± 3.1

KATOIII

Negative

WT

WT

WT

WT

L387L

WT

WT

65 ± 23.9

6.05 ± 0.84

 > 10,000

-2.8 ± 7.4

  1. Standard deviations are representative of triplicate experiments