Skip to main content

Table 3 Meta-analysis results for the prevalence of CFS/ME

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)

Group

N. of dataa

Random effects model (%)

Heterogeneity (P < 0.01, P = 0%)

 

Prevalence

95% CI

Q

T2

I2 (%)

Total

56

0.68

[0.48; 0.97]

8602.90

1.7199

99.4

Sex

 Male

24

0.86

[0.58; 1.27]

279.89

0.6666

91.8

 Female

24

1.36

[0.91; 2.02]

822.64

0.8003

97.2

 Total

48

1.04

[0.76; 1.41]

1481.76

0.9471

96.8

Study participants

 Community

33

0.76

[0.53; 1.10]

3286.47

1.0363

99.0

 Primary care

23

0.63

[0.37; 1.10]

2732.10

1.7745

99.2

Population group

 General population (≥ 18 years)

  Male

23

0.89

[0.60; 1.32]

276.23

0.6607

92.0

  Female

23

1.36

[0.91; 2.04]

818.30

0.8009

97.3

  Total

44

0.65

[0.43; 0.99]

7717.65

1.8518

99.4

  Children/adolescents (< 18 years)

7

0.55

[0.22; 1.35]

538.13

1.4319

98.9

  Specific population

5

1.31

[0.61; 2.78]

80.54

0.6657

95.0

Case definition

 CDC-1994 [22]

34

0.89

[0.60; 1.33]

3871.64

1.3691

99.1

 Holmes [23]

8

0.17

[0.06; 0.49]

101.72

1.8890

93.1

  Australian [25]

4

0.79

[0.05; 12.55]

1002.43

7.8860

99.7

  Oxford [24]

4

1.41

[0.68; 2.93]

35.17

0.4468

91.5

  CCC [27] ECD [26] PVES [28] NICE [29]b

4

0.17

[0.04; 0.83]

1200.67

2.5864

99.8

Diagnostic method

 Interview (medical test −)

22

1.14

[0.76; 1.72]

1675.91

0.8269

98.7

 Interview(medical test +)

23

0.95

[0.69; 1.31]

365.72

0.5208

94.0

 Physician diagnosis

6

0.09

[0.05; 0.13]

200.49

0.2952

97.5

 Medical records

5

0.52

[0.16; 1.71]

1197.28

1.8360

99.7

  1. Refer to supplementary Additional file: Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  2. aTotal number of prevalence data points
  3. bCCC, Canadian Consensus Criteria; ECD, epidemiological case definition; PVES, post viral exhaustion syndrome; and NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline 2007; two studies with no verification of case definition and defined criteria were excluded