Skip to main content

Table 2 Coefficients of linear discriminant functions (LDF) derived from LDA for all possible combination of antibodies

From: Discriminant analysis and machine learning approach for evaluating and improving the performance of immunohistochemical algorithms for COO classification of DLBCL

Antibody combination

Sens

Spec

COO

Constant

Antibody

1

2

3

4

5

CD10

BCL6

FOXP1

GCET1

MUM1

As in Nyman

3,5

0.81

0.74

GCB

− 0.57

  

2.47

 

1.11

Non-GCB

− 3.29

  

4.38

 

5.06

As in Hans and

1,2,5

0.86

0.88

GCB

− 4.21

5.01

7.00

  

1.05

As in Colomo

   

Non-GCB

− 3.09

0.20

4.99

  

5.69

As in Hans*

1,5

0.77

0.91

GCB

− 2.29

6.53

   

2.11

Non-GCB

− 2.12

1.28

   

6.45

As in Choi

1,2,3,4,5

0.87

0.91

GCB

− 4.80

4.59

6.31

0.71

3.28

1.02

Non-GCB

− 3.98

− 0.41

3.80

3.75

1.24

4.73

As in Choi*

1,3,4,5

0.86

0.91

GCB

− 3.34

5.67

 

1.78

4.03

1.67

Non-GCB

− 3.46

0.24

 

4.39

1.69

5.12

As in VY3

1,2,3

0.87

0.91

GCB

− 4.18

4.86

6.99

0.64

  

Non-GCB

− 2.90

− 0.74

4.58

4.61

  

As in VY4

1,2,3,4

0.84

0.90

GCB

− 4.75

4.49

6.44

0.91

3.26

 

Non-GCB

− 2.97

− 0.86

4.40

4.70

1.12

 

1,4,5

0.81

0.92

GCB

− 3.14

6.01

  

3.93

2.22

Non-GCB

− 2.23

1.09

  

1.44

6.49

  1. Columns (Antibody) show the coefficient associated with each antibody for GCB classification (Sensibility performance) and non-GCB classification (Specificity performance). The first column remarks the combinations of antibodies as were used by IHC-decision trees. BCL6 and CD10 in the LDF are strongly related to the classification of GCB cases, whereas the inclusion of MUM1 in any algorithm is related to non-GCB detection, getting the most considerable value in the LDF
  2. Numeric Tags 1 = CD10, 2 = BCL6, 3 = FOXP1, 4 = GCTE1, and 5 = MUM1