Skip to main content

Table 8 Provides the comparison of performances of models generated in the present study with other approaches for drug ADR prediction

From: Computational models for the prediction of adverse cardiovascular drug reactions

Dataset

Feature

Algorithm

AUC

Sensitivity/recall

Precision

Accuracy

Pauwels et al. 2011

Substructures

RF

0.62

0.97

0.93

91.30

SMO

0.50

1.00

0.92

92.42

Present study

Biological

Random forest

0.52

0.99

0.94

91.24

Chemical

0.52

0.97

0.94

88.75

Phenotypic

0.5

1.00

0.95

93.83

Biological + chemical

0.53

0.96

0.94

89.06

Biological + phenotypic

0.52

1.00

0.94

93.3

Chemical + phenotypic

0.5

0.97

0.94

90.54

Biological + chemical + phenotypic

0.54

0.96

0.94

89.07

Biological

Support vector machine

0.51

0.99

0.93

93.56

Chemical

0.48

0.95

0.94

91.41

Phenotypic

0.5

1.00

0.94

93.83

Biological + chemical

0.53

0.95

0.94

90.24

Biological + phenotypic

0.52

0.99

0.94

93.66

Chemical + phenotypic

0.48

0.96

0.94

91.49

Biological + chemical + phenotypic

0.47

0.95

0.94

90.92